139:
22:
351:
In this particular case, the court found that there was a violation of the accused's right to counsel and right to silence. These violations were flagrant and the evidence would not have been otherwise been discovered thus rendering the trial unfair. Consequently, the evidence of Mr. Cook's statement
328:
by the US police officers. He requested access to a lawyer but the police never followed through with the request. When the
Canadian police arrived they questioned him but it was not until 20 minutes into the interrogation that they informed him of his right to retain and instruct counsel under
408:
336:
At trial the Crown sought to admit as evidence parts of the statements Cook made in the interrogation. Cook challenged the evidence as a violation of his rights under section 10(b).
300:
413:
423:
418:
113:
47:
359:
did not apply, and that the police were working as part of an
American investigation and were acting under their authority.
321:
94:
227:
66:
32:
51:
36:
43:
196:
73:
344:
The court held that acts of any
Canadian police force performing duties outside of Canada are subject to the
305:
144:
80:
375:
138:
62:
239:
308:. The Court held that Canadian police located in the United States were still subject to the
251:
231:
243:
325:
87:
402:
247:
220:
170:
21:
255:
235:
320:
Deltonia Cook was arrested by US police in
Louisiana at the request of the
355:
Justices L'Heureux-Dubé and McLachlin dissented, stating that the
270:
Cory and
Iacobucci JJ, joined by Lamer CJ and Major and Binnie JJ
15:
391:
312:
when interrogating a suspect for a murder in Canada.
282:
274:
266:
261:
211:
203:
187:
179:
169:
159:
152:
131:
409:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law
8:
50:. Unsourced material may be challenged and
114:Learn how and when to remove this message
324:. Initially upon arrest he was read his
368:
286:L'Heureux-Dubé J, joined by McLachlin J
164:Deltonia R Cook v Her Majesty The Queen
128:
7:
48:adding citations to reliable sources
376:SCC Case Information - Docket 25852
278:Bastarache J, joined by Gonthier J
14:
137:
20:
1:
414:Supreme Court of Canada cases
322:Royal Canadian Mounted Police
126:Supreme Court of Canada case
298:, 2 SCR 597, is a leading
440:
424:Canadian criminal case law
419:1998 in Canadian case law
216:
136:
155:Judgment: 1 October 1998
378:Supreme Court of Canada
306:Supreme Court of Canada
199: (18 December 1996)
145:Supreme Court of Canada
153:Hearing: 17 June 1998
329:section 10(b) of the
228:Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
340:Reasons of the Court
44:improve this article
240:Beverley McLachlin
290:
289:
252:Michel Bastarache
124:
123:
116:
98:
431:
379:
373:
304:decision of the
232:Charles Gonthier
225:Puisne Justices:
212:Court membership
197:1996 CanLII 2438
141:
129:
119:
112:
108:
105:
99:
97:
56:
24:
16:
439:
438:
434:
433:
432:
430:
429:
428:
399:
398:
392:CanLII decision
388:
383:
382:
374:
370:
365:
342:
318:
292:
244:Frank Iacobucci
223:
154:
148:
127:
120:
109:
103:
100:
57:
55:
41:
25:
12:
11:
5:
437:
435:
427:
426:
421:
416:
411:
401:
400:
395:
394:
387:
386:External links
384:
381:
380:
367:
366:
364:
361:
352:was excluded.
341:
338:
326:Miranda rights
317:
314:
288:
287:
284:
280:
279:
276:
272:
271:
268:
264:
263:
259:
258:
218:Chief Justice:
214:
213:
209:
208:
207:Appeal allowed
205:
201:
200:
189:
185:
184:
181:
177:
176:
173:
167:
166:
161:
160:Full case name
157:
156:
150:
149:
142:
134:
133:
125:
122:
121:
104:September 2012
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
436:
425:
422:
420:
417:
415:
412:
410:
407:
406:
404:
397:
393:
390:
389:
385:
377:
372:
369:
362:
360:
358:
353:
349:
347:
339:
337:
334:
332:
327:
323:
315:
313:
311:
307:
303:
302:
297:
296:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
262:Reasons given
260:
257:
253:
249:
248:John C. Major
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
222:
221:Antonio Lamer
219:
215:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
188:Prior history
186:
182:
178:
174:
172:
168:
165:
162:
158:
151:
147:
146:
140:
135:
130:
118:
115:
107:
96:
93:
89:
86:
82:
79:
75:
72:
68:
65: –
64:
60:
59:Find sources:
53:
49:
45:
39:
38:
34:
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
396:
371:
356:
354:
350:
345:
343:
335:
330:
319:
309:
299:
294:
293:
291:
224:
217:
192:
191:APPEAL from
163:
143:
110:
101:
91:
84:
77:
70:
58:
42:Please help
30:
275:Concurrence
403:Categories
363:References
316:Background
256:Ian Binnie
236:Peter Cory
180:Docket No.
74:newspapers
63:"R v Cook"
175:2 SCR 597
171:Citations
31:does not
295:R v Cook
267:Majority
193:R v Cook
132:R v Cook
357:Charter
346:Charter
331:Charter
310:Charter
301:Charter
283:Dissent
195:,
88:scholar
52:removed
37:sources
204:Ruling
183:25852
90:
83:
76:
69:
61:
95:JSTOR
81:books
67:news
35:any
33:cite
46:by
405::
348:.
333:.
254:,
250:,
246:,
242:,
238:,
234:,
230:,
117:)
111:(
106:)
102:(
92:·
85:·
78:·
71:·
54:.
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
