Knowledge

R v Sharpe

Source đź“ť

29: 230:
In its ruling the Supreme Court emphasized the interest of the government to prevent the proliferation of child pornography and upheld its prohibition (reversing the decision to strike down the statute at-large), while also recognizing the importance of "adolescent self-fulfillment,
249:
Ultimately, after the case was remitted, Sharpe received a four-month conditional house arrest sentence, in issuing the sentence Shaw noted "In the eyes of many he has become a pariah, endured six years of this court case and has no criminal record".
231:
self-actualization and sexual exploration and identity." -(Paragraph 109) and that also commentated "To ban the possession of our own private musings thus falls perilously close to criminalizing the mere articulation of thought. " -(Paragraph 108).
240:
2.  Private recordings of lawful sexual activity: i.e., any visual recording, created by or depicting the accused, provided it does not depict unlawful sexual activity and is held by the accused exclusively for private use." -(Paragraph 115).
237:"1. Self-created expressive material: i.e., any written material or visual representation created by the accused alone, and held by the accused alone, exclusively for his or her own personal use; and 418: 168: 423: 173: 438: 194:
After police seized 517 photographs mostly of young boys, as well as sexually explicit stories; John Robin Sharpe was charged on two counts of
453: 340: 448: 443: 309: 195: 183: 202:
placed an unreasonable limitation on his freedom of expression, and in a ruling the British Columbia Court of Appeal concurred;
463: 458: 428: 270: 178:
holding, that while general prohibition of child pornography was constitutional, there were some limits imposed by the
198:, and on another two counts of possession with intent to distribute. Sharpe argued that the relevant provision of the 164: 93: 214:. Before its eventual reexamination by the Supreme Court, the decision invited protest, with more than half of the 219: 395: 156: 34: 199: 433: 296: 28: 215: 403: 203: 364: 86: 346: 336: 305: 160: 109: 207: 97: 399: 101: 412: 117: 105: 60: 121: 206:
ruled that the law was a "profound invasion" of the freedom of expression and
113: 350: 295:
Social Action Commission of the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada (May 2002).
136:
McLachin (paras 1–130), joined by Iacobucci, Major, Binnie, Arbour, and LeBel
234:
Ultimately the court carved out two exceptions to the power, and law:
304:(3rd Revised ed.). Markham, Ontario: Faith Today Publications. 369: 333:
Human Rights in an Information Age : A Philosophical Analysis
298:
Innocence Preserved: Protecting Children From Child Pornography
155:, 2001 SCC 2 is a constitutional rights decision of the 144:
L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, and Bastarache (paras 131–243)
159:. The court balanced the societal interest to regulate 140: 132: 127: 77: 69: 59: 49: 42: 21: 271:"Sharpe sentenced in B.C. child pornography case" 419:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law 320:– via Evangelical Fellowship of Canada. 8: 182:. The decision overturned a ruling by the 73:Appeal allowed, charges remitted to trial 54:Her Majesty The Queen v John Robin Sharpe 335:. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 424:Canadian freedom of expression case law 259: 174:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 18: 7: 265: 263: 167:possessed by the defendants under 14: 16:2001 Supreme Court of Canada case 184:British Columbia Court of Appeal 27: 196:possession of child pornography 1: 439:Supreme Court of Canada cases 43:Hearing: January 18, 19 2000 454:Section Two Charter case law 331:Walters, Gregory J. (2001). 480: 449:Canadian criminal case law 365:"R. v. Sharpe - SCC Cases" 45:Judgment: January 26, 2001 444:2001 in Canadian case law 82: 26: 396:Supreme Court of Canada 157:Supreme Court of Canada 35:Supreme Court of Canada 398:decision available at 464:Canadian juvenile law 459:Pornography in Canada 429:Child pornography law 216:Members of Parliament 165:freedom of expression 163:against the right to 94:Claire L'Heureux-DubĂ© 65:2001 SCC 2, 1 SCR 45 204:Justice Duncan Shaw 87:Beverley McLachlin 342:978-1-44267-592-6 161:child pornography 148: 147: 110:Michel Bastarache 471: 382: 381: 379: 378: 361: 355: 354: 328: 322: 321: 319: 318: 303: 292: 286: 285: 283: 282: 267: 218:petitioning the 208:right to privacy 98:Charles Gonthier 91:Puisne Justices: 78:Court membership 31: 19: 479: 478: 474: 473: 472: 470: 469: 468: 409: 408: 391: 386: 385: 376: 374: 363: 362: 358: 343: 330: 329: 325: 316: 314: 312: 301: 294: 293: 289: 280: 278: 269: 268: 261: 256: 247: 228: 192: 102:Frank Iacobucci 89: 44: 38: 17: 12: 11: 5: 477: 475: 467: 466: 461: 456: 451: 446: 441: 436: 431: 426: 421: 411: 410: 407: 406: 390: 389:External links 387: 384: 383: 373:. January 2001 356: 341: 323: 310: 287: 258: 257: 255: 252: 246: 243: 227: 224: 222:to intervene. 220:Prime Minister 191: 188: 146: 145: 142: 138: 137: 134: 130: 129: 125: 124: 84:Chief Justice: 80: 79: 75: 74: 71: 67: 66: 63: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 32: 24: 23: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 476: 465: 462: 460: 457: 455: 452: 450: 447: 445: 442: 440: 437: 435: 432: 430: 427: 425: 422: 420: 417: 416: 414: 405: 401: 397: 394:Full text of 393: 392: 388: 372: 371: 366: 360: 357: 352: 348: 344: 338: 334: 327: 324: 313: 311:0-9730621-1-8 307: 300: 299: 291: 288: 277:. May 3, 2002 276: 272: 266: 264: 260: 253: 251: 244: 242: 238: 235: 232: 225: 223: 221: 217: 213: 210:found in the 209: 205: 201: 200:criminal code 197: 189: 187: 185: 181: 177: 175: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 153: 143: 139: 135: 131: 128:Reasons given 126: 123: 119: 118:Louise Arbour 115: 111: 107: 106:John C. Major 103: 99: 95: 92: 88: 85: 81: 76: 72: 68: 64: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 36: 30: 25: 20: 434:Sex case law 375:. Retrieved 368: 359: 332: 326: 315:. Retrieved 297: 290: 279:. Retrieved 274: 248: 239: 236: 233: 229: 211: 193: 179: 172: 151: 150: 149: 90: 83: 53: 33: 141:Concurrence 122:Louis LeBel 413:Categories 377:2019-01-01 317:2019-01-01 281:2019-01-01 254:References 190:Background 152:R v Sharpe 114:Ian Binnie 22:R v Sharpe 351:666910377 245:Aftermath 169:section 2 61:Citations 275:CBC News 133:Majority 226:Holding 212:Charter 180:Charter 171:of the 404:CanLII 349:  339:  308:  70:Ruling 400:LexUM 370:LexUM 302:(PDF) 402:and 347:OCLC 337:ISBN 306:ISBN 415:: 367:. 345:. 273:. 262:^ 186:. 120:, 116:, 112:, 108:, 104:, 100:, 96:, 380:. 353:. 284:. 176:;

Index

Supreme Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Citations
Beverley McLachlin
Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
Charles Gonthier
Frank Iacobucci
John C. Major
Michel Bastarache
Ian Binnie
Louise Arbour
Louis LeBel
Supreme Court of Canada
child pornography
freedom of expression
section 2
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
British Columbia Court of Appeal
possession of child pornography
criminal code
Justice Duncan Shaw
right to privacy
Members of Parliament
Prime Minister


"Sharpe sentenced in B.C. child pornography case"
Innocence Preserved: Protecting Children From Child Pornography
ISBN
0-9730621-1-8

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑