86:. He decided to try mapping the numbers into images and using the pattern-detecting capabilities of the human visual system to look for a lack of randomness. Julesz noticed that two identical random images when viewed through a stereoscope, appeared as if they were projected onto a uniform flat surface. He experimented with the image pair by shifting a square area in the center of one of the images by a small amount. When he viewed this pair through the stereoscope, the square appeared to rise out from the page.
358:
necessary to give a sensation of depth. A small shift yields a small amount of depth; a larger shift yields a larger amount of depth. If the shift is in the opposite horizontal direction, the depth will be reversed: The central, square area will appear as a square hole to a surface father from the
214:
Observers' performance in recognizing the figure present in a stereogram in the presence of statistical noise has been found to be higher for a stereogram that consists in black and white dots on a grey background compared to a similar stereogram with only white (or only black) dots on a grey
109:
is processed by the human brain. According to Ralph Siegel, Julesz had "unambiguously demonstrated that stereoscopic depth could be computed in the absence of any identifiable objects, in the absence of any perspective, in the absence of any cues available to either eye alone."
258:
Dynamic random-dot stereograms consist of a moving stereoscopic (cyclopean) form made of moving random dots, camouflaged by further random dots. The observer is to make a perceptual judgment about the shape and/or motion of the
200:
in place of a vectograph; that is, the patient wears red-green glasses (in place of the polarizing glasses used in the randot stereotest). Like other random dot stereotests, the TNO test offers no monocular clues.
342:
To view the stereogram, use a stereoscope to present the left image to the left eye and the right image to the right eye or focus on a point behind the image to achieve the same thing. (How to achieve this
71:. Using it, two photographs, taken a small horizontal distance apart, could be viewed one to each eye so that the objects in the photograph appeared to be three-dimensional in a three-dimensional scene.
241:
and
Maureen Clarke led to their inventing single images yielding depth without a stereoscope. These are known as single image random dot stereograms (SIRDS), or random dot autostereograms.
277:
Dynamic random-dot stereograms containing binocular motion stimuli can be designed to test whether someone has at least rudimentary stereopsis. One study found that in
94:
The discovery of the random dot stereogram was intriguing not just for its ability to create depth sensations in printed images but also for its implications in
578:
323:
244:
Replacing the random dot base pattern with an image or texture gives the form that made the single image stereogram known to the general public, through the
141:. The stereoacuity is measured from the patient's ability to identify forms from random dot backgrounds, as presented on several plates or pages of a book.
351:). The shifted region of random dots will appear as a small, central, square area closer to your eyes than the larger, surrounding, rectangular area.
332:
318:
309:
304:
337:
586:
498:
328:
3. Shift this region horizontally by one or two dot diameters and fill in the empty region with new random dots. The stereogram is complete.
44:
734:
51:
Later concepts, involving single images, not necessarily consisting of random dots, and more well known to the general public, are
359:
eyes than the larger, surrounding, rectangular area. (A simple way to achieve this with the example stereogram is to adopt a
425:
615:
534:
176:
The randot stereotest is more sensitive to monocular blur than real depth stereotests such as the "Frisby test".
31:, or with the eyes focused on a point in front of or behind the images, produces a sensation of depth due to
83:
322:
133:
About 5% of individuals are unable to perceive depth in random-dot stereograms due to various disorders of
680:
Fujikado, T (1998). "Use of
Dynamic and Colored Stereogram to Measure Stereopsis in Strabismic Patients".
363:
position of the eyes; this presents the left image to the right eye and the right image to the left eye.)
260:
64:
591:
729:
355:
267:
607:
281:
patients a dynamic random dot stereogram yielded a significantly higher rate detection rate for
705:
697:
662:
559:
494:
469:
331:
317:
308:
303:
238:
166:
95:
488:
689:
652:
599:
549:
459:
451:
406:
396:
336:
271:
134:
535:"Independent mechanisms for bright and dark image features in a stereo correspondence task"
595:
516:"Independent neural mechanisms for bright and dark information in binocular stereopsis"
464:
439:
348:
224:
75:
52:
39:
693:
411:
384:
723:
611:
641:"Electronics for generating simultaneous random-dot cyclopean and monocular stimuli"
577:
Tyler, Christopher; Maureen Clarke (1990). Merritt, John O; Fisher, Scott S (eds.).
300:
1. Create an image of suitable size. Fill it with random dots. Duplicate the image.
170:
297:
The process used to develop the first random-dot stereogram is illustrated below.
455:
401:
197:
68:
28:
274:
and more generally by those who have sufficient binocular vision for the task.
286:
282:
278:
162:
154:
106:
99:
32:
27:) is stereo pair of images of random dots that, when viewed with the aid of a
701:
666:
428:, ONE Network, American Academy of Phthalmology (downloaded 2 September 2014)
117:
based on his whimsical notion that the depth could be seen only by a single,
246:
158:
79:
38:
The random-dot stereogram technique, known since 1919, was elaborated on by
563:
515:
473:
709:
438:
N.V. Odell; S.R. Hatt; D.A. Leske; W.E. Adams; J.M. Holmes (April 2009).
35:, with objects appearing to be in front of or behind the display level.
657:
640:
122:
603:
554:
533:
Read, Jenny C.A.; Vaz, Xavier A.; Serrano-Pedraza, Ignacio (2011).
440:"The effect of induced monocular blur on measures of stereoacuity"
314:
2. Select a region in one image, in this case, in the right image.
270:
stimuli, stereoscopic motion is perceived by persons with normal
173:. The Randot test can measure stereoacuity to 20 seconds of arc.
487:
John A. Pratt-Johnson; Geraldine
Tillson (1 January 2001).
157:
random dot stereotest. It is frequently used for detecting
490:
Management of
Strabismus and Amblyopia: A Practical Guide
266:
When presented with a dynamic random dot stereogram with
639:
Neff, Robert; Schwartz, Scott; Stork, David G. (1985).
645:
Behavior
Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers
237:
of images based on random dots. Additional work by
82:aimed at identifying patterns within the output of
105:The random dot stereogram provided insight on how
196:) is similar to the randot stereotest but is an
8:
137:. These individuals can be identified with
656:
553:
463:
410:
400:
378:
376:
372:
587:Stereoscopic Displays and Applications
385:"Choices: The Science of Bela Julesz"
347:position of the eyes is described in
113:In his 1971 book, Julesz termed this
7:
45:Foundations of Cyclopean Perception
514:Harris J.M.; Parker A. J. (1995).
14:
682:Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
522:. No. 374. pp. 808–811.
121:, similar to the single eye of a
354:The shifted region produces the
335:
330:
321:
316:
307:
302:
268:stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion
254:Dynamic random dot stereograms
42:, described in his 1971 book,
1:
694:10.1016/S0021-5155(97)00120-2
590:. Proc. SPIE 1256: 182–197.
456:10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.09.005
402:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020172
383:Siegel, Ralph (2004-06-15).
751:
222:
186:TNO random dot stereotest
180:TNO random dot stereotest
735:Diagnostic ophthalmology
493:. Thieme. pp. 39–.
84:random number generators
261:dichoptically presented
233:specifically refers to
78:initiated a project at
139:random-dot stereotests
129:Random-dot stereotests
65:Sir Charles Wheatstone
287:Titmus fly stereotest
231:random dot stereogram
21:random-dot stereogram
579:"The Autostereogram"
426:Stereoacuity testing
205:Further developments
169:, and for assessing
115:cyclopean perception
596:1990SPIE.1256..182T
356:binocular disparity
293:Illustrated example
658:10.3758/BF03200943
542:Journal of Vision
500:978-0-86577-992-1
250:series of books.
239:Christopher Tyler
151:randot stereotest
145:Randot stereotest
98:and the study of
96:cognitive science
742:
714:
713:
677:
671:
670:
660:
636:
630:
629:
627:
626:
620:
614:. Archived from
604:10.1117/12.19904
583:
574:
568:
567:
557:
539:
530:
524:
523:
511:
505:
504:
484:
478:
477:
467:
444:Journal of AAPOS
435:
429:
423:
417:
416:
414:
404:
380:
339:
334:
325:
320:
311:
306:
272:binocular vision
135:binocular vision
16:Type of 3D image
750:
749:
745:
744:
743:
741:
740:
739:
720:
719:
718:
717:
679:
678:
674:
638:
637:
633:
624:
622:
618:
581:
576:
575:
571:
555:10.1167/11.12.4
537:
532:
531:
527:
513:
512:
508:
501:
486:
485:
481:
437:
436:
432:
424:
420:
382:
381:
374:
369:
329:
315:
301:
295:
256:
227:
221:
219:Autostereograms
212:
207:
190:TNO stereo test
182:
147:
131:
92:
61:
53:autostereograms
17:
12:
11:
5:
748:
746:
738:
737:
732:
722:
721:
716:
715:
688:(2): 101–107.
672:
651:(3): 363–370.
631:
569:
525:
506:
499:
479:
450:(2): 136–141.
430:
418:
371:
370:
368:
365:
349:Autostereogram
294:
291:
255:
252:
225:Autostereogram
223:Main article:
220:
217:
211:
208:
206:
203:
181:
178:
146:
143:
130:
127:
91:
88:
67:developed the
60:
57:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
747:
736:
733:
731:
728:
727:
725:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
676:
673:
668:
664:
659:
654:
650:
646:
642:
635:
632:
621:on 2009-02-25
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
588:
580:
573:
570:
565:
561:
556:
551:
547:
543:
536:
529:
526:
521:
517:
510:
507:
502:
496:
492:
491:
483:
480:
475:
471:
466:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
434:
431:
427:
422:
419:
413:
408:
403:
398:
394:
390:
386:
379:
377:
373:
366:
364:
362:
357:
352:
350:
346:
340:
338:
333:
326:
324:
319:
312:
310:
305:
298:
292:
290:
288:
284:
280:
275:
273:
269:
264:
263:moving form.
262:
253:
251:
249:
248:
242:
240:
236:
232:
226:
218:
216:
209:
204:
202:
199:
195:
191:
187:
179:
177:
174:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
144:
142:
140:
136:
128:
126:
124:
120:
119:cyclopean eye
116:
111:
108:
107:stereo vision
103:
101:
97:
89:
87:
85:
81:
77:
74:Around 1956,
72:
70:
66:
58:
56:
54:
49:
47:
46:
41:
36:
34:
30:
26:
22:
685:
681:
675:
648:
644:
634:
623:. Retrieved
616:the original
585:
572:
548:(12): 1–14.
545:
541:
528:
519:
509:
489:
482:
447:
443:
433:
421:
392:
388:
360:
353:
344:
341:
327:
313:
299:
296:
276:
265:
257:
245:
243:
234:
230:
228:
215:background.
213:
193:
189:
185:
183:
175:
171:stereoacuity
150:
148:
138:
132:
118:
114:
112:
104:
93:
90:Implications
73:
62:
50:
43:
37:
24:
20:
18:
395:(6): e172.
167:suppression
76:Béla Julesz
69:stereoscope
40:Béla Julesz
29:stereoscope
730:3D imaging
724:Categories
625:2008-11-16
367:References
361:cross-eyed
283:stereopsis
279:strabismic
210:Efficiency
163:strabismus
155:vectograph
100:perception
33:stereopsis
702:0021-5155
667:0743-3808
612:263894428
389:PLOS Biol
345:wall-eyed
285:than the
247:Magic Eye
229:The name
159:amblyopia
80:Bell Labs
63:In 1840,
564:21984818
474:19071047
198:anaglyph
194:TNO test
188:(short:
710:9587841
592:Bibcode
465:3933817
123:cyclops
59:History
708:
700:
665:
610:
562:
520:Nature
497:
472:
462:
412:423145
409:
619:(PDF)
608:S2CID
582:(PDF)
538:(PDF)
235:pairs
153:is a
706:PMID
698:ISSN
663:ISSN
560:PMID
495:ISBN
470:PMID
184:The
165:and
149:The
690:doi
653:doi
600:doi
550:doi
460:PMC
452:doi
407:PMC
397:doi
192:or
25:RDS
726::
704:.
696:.
686:42
684:.
661:.
649:17
647:.
643:.
606:.
598:.
584:.
558:.
546:11
544:.
540:.
518:.
468:.
458:.
448:13
446:.
442:.
405:.
391:.
387:.
375:^
289:.
161:,
125:.
102:.
55:.
48:.
19:A
712:.
692::
669:.
655::
628:.
602::
594::
566:.
552::
503:.
476:.
454::
415:.
399::
393:2
23:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.