83:. Narrative synthesis allows researchers to address a wide range of questions in their review, while meta-ethnography aims to preserve the cultural context in which the original findings of the included studies were generated. The narrative synthesis approach has attracted criticism because of its potential for bias, with critics highlighting the subjective nature of the use of the method to draw conclusions. There is also evidence that reviews using the narrative synthesis approach often suffer from a lack of transparency.
399:
72:(less uncertainty) than the individual studies, but it may be biased by differences between the studies in study design, the type of evidence, or other key characteristics.
45:
It aims to generate new knowledge by combining and comparing the results of multiple studies on a given topic. One approach is to use a
436:
132:
330:
277:
326:"Lack of transparency in reporting narrative synthesis of quantitative data: a methodological assessment of systematic reviews"
104:
228:
194:
188:
Wyborn C, Louder E, Harrison J, Montambault J, Montana J, Ryan M, Bednarek A, Nesshöver C, Pullin A (August 2018).
42:. Its general goals are to make the findings from multiple different studies more generalizable and applicable.
153:
455:
383:
226:
Denyer D, Tranfield D, van Aken JE (March 2008). "Developing Design
Propositions through Research Synthesis".
387:
124:
460:
429:
69:
76:
35:
80:
39:
108:
253:
378:
422:
357:
306:
245:
170:
128:
46:
406:
68:
from a number of studies to calculate an overall measure. This measure of effect has greater
347:
339:
296:
286:
237:
203:
162:
116:
61:
352:
325:
301:
272:
27:
60:
is the preferred technique of quantitative research synthesis in many fields, such as
449:
257:
57:
343:
208:
189:
112:
65:
398:
151:
Suri H (2011-08-03). "Purposeful
Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis".
31:
249:
241:
174:
361:
310:
291:
166:
273:"Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review"
324:
Campbell M, Katikireddi SV, Sowden A, Thomson H (January 2019).
64:. It is a statistical technique that combines measures of
410:
384:
Evidence
Synthesis - What is it and why do we need it?
75:
In qualitative research, methods of synthesis include
26:
is the process of combining the results of multiple
190:"Understanding the Impacts of Research Synthesis"
113:"Hypotheses and Problems in Research Synthesis"
430:
30:studies aimed at testing the same conceptual
8:
437:
423:
98:
96:
351:
300:
290:
207:
271:Barnett-Page E, Thomas J (August 2009).
103:Hall, Judith A.; Tickle-Degnen, Linda;
92:
146:
144:
7:
395:
393:
221:
219:
409:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
195:Environmental Science & Policy
121:The Handbook of Research Synthesis
14:
397:
331:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
278:BMC Medical Research Methodology
344:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.019
34:. It may be applied to either
1:
209:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.013
154:Qualitative Research Journal
477:
405:This science article is a
392:
379:About Evidence Synthesis
242:10.1177/0170840607088020
125:Russell Sage Foundation
292:10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
115:. In Cooper, Harris;
229:Organization Studies
109:Mosteller, Frederick
40:qualitative research
77:narrative synthesis
167:10.3316/QRJ1102063
17:Research synthesis
418:
417:
105:Rosenthal, Robert
47:systematic review
468:
456:Research methods
439:
432:
425:
401:
394:
366:
365:
355:
321:
315:
314:
304:
294:
268:
262:
261:
223:
214:
213:
211:
185:
179:
178:
148:
139:
138:
117:Hedges, Larry V.
100:
81:meta-ethnography
28:primary research
476:
475:
471:
470:
469:
467:
466:
465:
446:
445:
444:
443:
375:
370:
369:
323:
322:
318:
270:
269:
265:
225:
224:
217:
187:
186:
182:
150:
149:
142:
135:
102:
101:
94:
89:
62:medical science
55:
12:
11:
5:
474:
472:
464:
463:
458:
448:
447:
442:
441:
434:
427:
419:
416:
415:
402:
391:
390:
381:
374:
373:External links
371:
368:
367:
316:
263:
236:(3): 393–413.
215:
180:
140:
133:
111:(1993-11-23).
91:
90:
88:
85:
54:
51:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
473:
462:
461:Science stubs
459:
457:
454:
453:
451:
440:
435:
433:
428:
426:
421:
420:
414:
412:
408:
403:
400:
396:
389:
385:
382:
380:
377:
376:
372:
363:
359:
354:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
332:
327:
320:
317:
312:
308:
303:
298:
293:
288:
284:
280:
279:
274:
267:
264:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
230:
222:
220:
216:
210:
205:
201:
197:
196:
191:
184:
181:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
155:
147:
145:
141:
136:
134:9781610441377
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
99:
97:
93:
86:
84:
82:
78:
73:
71:
67:
63:
59:
58:Meta-analysis
52:
50:
48:
43:
41:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
411:expanding it
404:
335:
329:
319:
282:
276:
266:
233:
227:
199:
193:
183:
161:(2): 63–75.
158:
152:
120:
74:
56:
44:
36:quantitative
23:
20:
16:
15:
66:effect size
450:Categories
87:References
53:Techniques
49:method.
32:hypothesis
285:(1): 59.
258:143261509
250:0170-8406
202:: 72–84.
175:1443-9883
70:precision
24:synthesis
388:Cochrane
362:30196129
311:19671152
119:(eds.).
21:evidence
353:6327109
338:: 1–9.
302:3224695
360:
350:
309:
299:
256:
248:
173:
131:
254:S2CID
407:stub
358:PMID
307:PMID
246:ISSN
171:ISSN
129:ISBN
79:and
348:PMC
340:doi
336:105
297:PMC
287:doi
238:doi
204:doi
163:doi
38:or
19:or
452::
386:,
356:.
346:.
334:.
328:.
305:.
295:.
281:.
275:.
252:.
244:.
234:29
232:.
218:^
200:86
198:.
192:.
169:.
159:11
157:.
143:^
127:.
123:.
107:;
95:^
438:e
431:t
424:v
413:.
364:.
342::
313:.
289::
283:9
260:.
240::
212:.
206::
177:.
165::
137:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.