Knowledge (XXG)

Standardisierte Bewertung

Source 📝

97:
projects a Standardisierte Bewertung value of about 1.5 has been elaborated. However this was executed with a modified process which included enhanced German export successes, less traffic jams and enhanced international relationships. Based on the standard procedure for railway projects, the result
84:
quickly established as part of the legal process. However the Standardisierte Bewertung assessment is ordered from private companies and consultants as further example and gained international acknowledgement, e.g. to obtain Transport and Works Act Order Applications and state funding in the UK.
83:
The cost-benefit indicator of the monetisable components is the decisive factor for the GVFG funding. It is a simple number showing the cost / effect ratio. Funding will only be given for projects with a ratio bigger than 1. The process has started as a private consultancy scheme and was rather
68:
Several steps are taken. First any project effect will scrutinized whether a measurable (cardinal) effect is to be found or not. The non-measurable effects will be summarized in an appendix. Measurable effects are categorized as:
51:
The evaluation is based on a comparison of a "With" and "Without" solution, so the effect of a continuation of the existing network will be compared to the effects of the planned project. The result of the
60:, also for society and environment, of a planned project. The evaluation scheme tries to deliver a comparable evaluation of different projects to allow a just distribution of public funding. 193: 126:(with values of 2.5 for several projects) "Standi" as short term for Standardisierte Bewertung is as a household term explained in the local Stadtwiki (in German) 244: 23:
of public transport projects in Germany. The process is part of a legal process to obtain federal funds (up to 85%) within the
43:
and the Munich based Intraplan Consult start of the 80s. Updates have been published in 2000, 2006, and 2016, inter alia.
24: 190: 120: 103: 226: 249: 36: 76:
transferable into monetary units via established processes (e.g. travel time reduction, pollution)
99: 20: 165: 208: 214: 197: 143: 179: 98:
would have been around 0.8 (not sufficient for funding). The critical assessment of the
238: 57: 123: 110: 94: 40: 35:
Standardisierte Bewertung is based on the work of the traffic scientist
114: 154: 191:
2005 Dresden Transrapid Standi Conference paper ... S.13
168: 144:GVFG as published by the Bundestag 26. März 1996 56:shall include most quantitatively measurable 8: 136: 19:is an evaluation scheme to determine 7: 14: 121:In Karlsruhe, dubbed the Mecca of 109:A use of an adapted scheme for a 93:For the Metrorapid and Munich 1: 180:Reference Sheet of Intraplan 245:Public transport in Germany 73:measured in financial units 266: 227:Karlsruhe Consultancy TTK 104:Bundesverkehrsministerium 54:Standardisierte Bewertung 17:Standardisierte Bewertung 102:was not accepted by the 210:Rechenkünstler Mehdorn 155:Intraplan Consult GmbH 212:("Accounting Acrobat" 21:cost-benefit ratios 196:2007-06-12 at the 166:Drees & Sommer 100:Bundesrechnungshof 257: 229: 224: 218: 206: 200: 188: 182: 177: 171: 169:official website 163: 157: 152: 146: 141: 117:is mentioned in 58:external effects 265: 264: 260: 259: 258: 256: 255: 254: 235: 234: 233: 232: 225: 221: 207: 203: 198:Wayback Machine 189: 185: 178: 174: 164: 160: 153: 149: 142: 138: 133: 90: 79:not monetisable 66: 49: 37:Gerhard Heimerl 33: 12: 11: 5: 263: 261: 253: 252: 250:Law of Germany 247: 237: 236: 231: 230: 219: 201: 183: 172: 158: 147: 135: 134: 132: 129: 128: 127: 118: 107: 89: 86: 81: 80: 77: 74: 65: 62: 48: 45: 32: 29: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 262: 251: 248: 246: 243: 242: 240: 228: 223: 220: 216: 213: 211: 205: 202: 199: 195: 192: 187: 184: 181: 176: 173: 170: 167: 162: 159: 156: 151: 148: 145: 140: 137: 130: 125: 122: 119: 116: 112: 108: 105: 101: 96: 92: 91: 87: 85: 78: 75: 72: 71: 70: 63: 61: 59: 55: 46: 44: 42: 38: 30: 28: 26: 22: 18: 222: 209: 204: 186: 175: 161: 150: 139: 82: 67: 53: 50: 34: 16: 15: 113:project in 239:Categories 124:Tram-train 111:Tram-train 95:Transrapid 31:Background 41:Stuttgart 194:Archived 215:Mehdorn 131:Sources 115:Bristol 64:Process 88:Trivia 47:Goals 27:Law. 25:GVFG 39:in 241:: 217:) 106:.

Index

cost-benefit ratios
GVFG
Gerhard Heimerl
Stuttgart
external effects
Transrapid
Bundesrechnungshof
Bundesverkehrsministerium
Tram-train
Bristol
In Karlsruhe, dubbed the Mecca of
Tram-train
GVFG as published by the Bundestag 26. März 1996
Intraplan Consult GmbH
Drees & Sommer
official website
Reference Sheet of Intraplan
2005 Dresden Transrapid Standi Conference paper ... S.13
Archived
Wayback Machine
Rechenkünstler Mehdorn ("Accounting Acrobat"
Mehdorn
Karlsruhe Consultancy TTK
Categories
Public transport in Germany
Law of Germany

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.