33:
110:
272:"speech" or "religion" which were both in the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of the federal government. The majority noted that the law had the effect that the chief of police would act in the role of a censor, deciding whether certain literature was objectionable. The result, they observed, would be that unpopular groups such as the Jehovah's Witnesses would be censored.
326:
275:
The dissent focused on the purpose of the law, observing that it was intended to protect the public and keep the streets clean. They found no basis for Saumur's claim that it prevented the
Jehovah's Witnesses from their religious practice.
279:
This decision was subsequently used to dismiss more than 1000 cases against
Witnesses in the Province of Quebec. It was one of a series of cases the Supreme Court dealt with concerning the rights of Jehovah's Witnesses under the
250:. At the time, police harassment of Witnesses was widespread in Quebec, and Mr. Saumur had been arrested 103 times for distribution of Witness literature when he decided to challenge the legal basis for the arrests.
265:
on the basis that it was outside of the municipality's jurisdiction and that it had the effect of religious and political censorship. The case reached the
Supreme Court in 1953.
356:
62:
351:
366:
346:
238:
Laurier Saumur (6 Feb. 1921–22 Mar. 2007) was born and raised
Catholic, but grew disillusioned as a youth and studied the teachings of the
376:
341:
84:
361:
261:
municipal by-law that prohibited the distribution of literature in the street without the proper authorization of the city's
242:. He was baptized as a Witness in 1944 and soon began to work as a door-to-door missionary for the Witnesses, first in
45:
371:
55:
49:
41:
290:
S.C.R. 265 according to which mere criticism of the government does not constitute seditious libel. Subsequent to
66:
232:
115:
296:
239:
109:
254:
269:
235:
which struck down a municipal by-law prohibiting the distribution of literature to the public.
281:
17:
321:
262:
335:
309:
300:
S.C.R. 121 which punished
Duplessis for revoking a Jehovah's Witness liquor license.
141:
286:
258:
247:
268:
In a 5 to 4 decision, the Court held that the subject matter of the law was
243:
26:
327:
Obituary of
Laurier Saumur, Toronto Globe and Mail 5 May 2007
284:
government of Quebec. Previous to this there was the case of
231:
2 S.C.R. 299 is a famous constitutional decision of the
216:
208:
200:
192:
184:
176:
168:
163:
158:
150:
140:
130:
123:
102:
54:but its sources remain unclear because it lacks
8:
85:Learn how and when to remove this message
357:Christianity and law in the 20th century
352:Canadian freedom of expression case law
99:
322:Full text of decision from canlii.org
212:Rinfret C.J., joined by Taschereau J.
7:
124:Hearing: December 9–12, 15-17, 1952
220:Cartwright J., joined by Fauteux J.
135:Laurier Saumur v The City of Quebec
257:, along with Saumur, challenged a
25:
347:Canadian constitutional case law
108:
31:
367:Jehovah's Witnesses litigation
1:
377:Supreme Court of Canada cases
97:Supreme Court of Canada case
18:Saumur v. The City of Quebec
393:
342:1953 in Canadian case law
228:Saumur v Quebec (City of)
126:Judgment: October 6, 1953
107:
103:Saumur v Quebec (City of)
40:This article includes a
233:Supreme Court of Canada
116:Supreme Court of Canada
69:more precise citations.
362:History of Quebec City
297:Roncarelli v Duplessis
154:Saumur appeal allowed
255:Jehovah's Witnesses
240:Jehovah's Witnesses
372:Religion in Canada
42:list of references
224:
223:
95:
94:
87:
16:(Redirected from
384:
294:was the case of
159:Court membership
112:
100:
90:
83:
79:
76:
70:
65:this article by
56:inline citations
35:
34:
27:
21:
392:
391:
387:
386:
385:
383:
382:
381:
332:
331:
318:
306:
263:Chief of Police
125:
119:
98:
91:
80:
74:
71:
60:
46:related reading
36:
32:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
390:
388:
380:
379:
374:
369:
364:
359:
354:
349:
344:
334:
333:
330:
329:
324:
317:
316:External links
314:
313:
312:
305:
302:
270:in relation to
222:
221:
218:
214:
213:
210:
206:
205:
202:
198:
197:
194:
190:
189:
186:
182:
181:
178:
174:
173:
170:
166:
165:
161:
160:
156:
155:
152:
148:
147:
144:
138:
137:
132:
131:Full case name
128:
127:
121:
120:
113:
105:
104:
96:
93:
92:
50:external links
39:
37:
30:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
389:
378:
375:
373:
370:
368:
365:
363:
360:
358:
355:
353:
350:
348:
345:
343:
340:
339:
337:
328:
325:
323:
320:
319:
315:
311:
310:Lamb v Benoit
308:
307:
303:
301:
299:
298:
293:
289:
288:
283:
277:
273:
271:
266:
264:
260:
256:
251:
249:
245:
241:
236:
234:
230:
229:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:Reasons given
162:
157:
153:
149:
145:
143:
139:
136:
133:
129:
122:
118:
117:
111:
106:
101:
89:
86:
78:
68:
64:
58:
57:
51:
47:
43:
38:
29:
28:
19:
295:
291:
285:
278:
274:
267:
252:
246:and then in
237:
227:
226:
225:
146:2 S.C.R. 299
134:
114:
81:
72:
61:Please help
53:
287:R v Boucher
259:Quebec City
253:A group of
248:Quebec City
201:Concurrence
193:Concurrence
185:Concurrence
177:Concurrence
67:introducing
336:Categories
188:Kellock J.
282:Duplessis
172:Kerwin J.
142:Citations
75:June 2022
304:See also
244:Montreal
204:Locke J.
196:Estey J.
169:Majority
217:Dissent
209:Dissent
180:Rand J.
63:improve
292:Saumur
151:Ruling
48:, or
338::
52:,
44:,
88:)
82:(
77:)
73:(
59:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
