39:
152:
may sometimes be able to avoid arid and confusing disputes about the identification of the appropriate comparator by concentrating primarily on why the claimant was treated as she was. Was it on the proscribed ground which is the foundation of the application? That will call for an examination of all
141:
agreed that the comparators were inappropriate. He noted that choosing which characteristics are relevant for the purposes of comparison should not defeat the purpose of the legislation, ‘which is to eliminate discrimination against women on the ground of their sex in all areas with which it deals.’
128:
The
Employment Tribunal held that there was sex discrimination. It said that the appropriate comparators were two male chief inspectors who were in the same branch and had the same duties, in which they continued, but who had not had complaints against them. The Northern Ireland Court of Appeal held
153:
the facts of the case. Or was it for some other reason? If the latter, the application fails. If the former, there will be usually no difficulty in deciding whether the treatment, afforded to the claimant on the proscribed ground, was less favourable than was or would have been afforded to others.
116:
Ms
Shamoon was a chief inspector in the police force, where part of her duties included conducting appraisals of other police officers. Her appraisal duties were removed from her after complaints were made about the way she did them. She was dismissed and made a claim under the Sex Discrimination
183:
406:
308:
350:
216:
551:
541:
336:
480:
453:
270:
129:
that her claim failed because the two comparators she pointed to who had done similar appraisals had had no complaints made against them.
322:
138:
556:
244:
176:
378:
546:
232:
38:
169:
422:
296:
137:
The House of Lords held that the comparators were inappropriate because there had been no complaints about them.
390:
366:
284:
497:
256:
17:
222:
202:
517:
476:
449:
199:
122:
509:
206:
49:
535:
417:
402:
145:
105:
442:
Adams, Zoe; Barnard, Catherine; Deakin, Simon; Butlin, Sarah Fraser (15 July 2021).
356:
340:
326:
274:
101:
67:
260:
470:
443:
161:
521:
513:
108:
case concerning the appropriate test for determining who is a comparator.
498:"Falling on Their Feet: Young Workers, Employment and Age Discrimination"
118:
165:
472:
Cambridge
Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Vol 9, 2006-2007
98:
Shamoon v Chief
Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary
32:
Shamoon v Chief
Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary
117:(Northern Ireland) Order 1976, which is the same as the
84:
74:
63:
55:
45:
31:
150:
177:
8:
310:Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police v Khan
184:
170:
162:
37:
28:
352:Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
218:Stefanko v Doherty and Maritime Hotel Ltd
469:Barnard, Catherine (18 December 2007).
434:
337:Roma Rights Centre v Prague Immigration
448:. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 653.
475:. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 34.
7:
271:Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (No 2)
323:Shamoon v Royal Ulster Constabulary
18:Shamoon v Royal Ulster Constabulary
25:
245:R (EOC) v Birmingham City Council
552:2003 in United Kingdom case law
542:United Kingdom labour case law
379:English v Sanderson Blinds Ltd
1:
445:Deakin and Morris' Labour Law
297:Grant v South-West Trains Ltd
233:Horsey v Dyfed County Council
496:Blackham, A. (1 July 2015).
192:Direct discrimination cases
573:
423:UK employment equality law
557:Royal Ulster Constabulary
399:
387:
375:
363:
347:
333:
319:
305:
293:
281:
267:
253:
241:
229:
213:
197:
89:
79:
36:
391:Grainger plc v Nicholson
80:Lord Hope, Lord Nicholls
121:, and now found in the
502:Industrial Law Journal
367:Coleman v Attridge Law
155:
514:10.1093/indlaw/dwv003
148:said that tribunals,
547:House of Lords cases
257:James v Eastleigh BC
285:Smith v Safeway plc
300:ICR 449 (C-249/96)
482:978-1-84731-400-0
455:978-1-5099-4356-2
413:
412:
200:Equality Act 2010
123:Equality Act 2010
94:
93:
16:(Redirected from
564:
526:
525:
493:
487:
486:
466:
460:
459:
439:
353:
311:
219:
186:
179:
172:
163:
59:27 February 2003
41:
29:
21:
572:
571:
567:
566:
565:
563:
562:
561:
532:
531:
530:
529:
495:
494:
490:
483:
468:
467:
463:
456:
441:
440:
436:
431:
414:
409:
395:
383:
371:
370:(2008) C-303/06
359:
351:
343:
329:
315:
309:
301:
289:
277:
263:
249:
237:
225:
217:
209:
193:
190:
160:
135:
114:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
570:
568:
560:
559:
554:
549:
544:
534:
533:
528:
527:
508:(2): 246–261.
488:
481:
461:
454:
433:
432:
430:
427:
426:
425:
420:
411:
410:
400:
397:
396:
388:
385:
384:
376:
373:
372:
364:
361:
360:
348:
345:
344:
334:
331:
330:
320:
317:
316:
306:
303:
302:
294:
291:
290:
282:
279:
278:
268:
265:
264:
254:
251:
250:
242:
239:
238:
230:
227:
226:
214:
211:
210:
198:
195:
194:
191:
189:
188:
181:
174:
166:
159:
156:
134:
131:
113:
110:
92:
91:
90:Discrimination
87:
86:
82:
81:
77:
76:
72:
71:
65:
61:
60:
57:
53:
52:
50:House of Lords
47:
43:
42:
34:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
569:
558:
555:
553:
550:
548:
545:
543:
540:
539:
537:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
492:
489:
484:
478:
474:
473:
465:
462:
457:
451:
447:
446:
438:
435:
428:
424:
421:
419:
418:UK labour law
416:
415:
408:
404:
398:
393:
392:
386:
382:EWCA Civ 1421
381:
380:
374:
369:
368:
362:
358:
355:
354:
346:
342:
339:
338:
332:
328:
325:
324:
318:
313:
312:
304:
299:
298:
292:
287:
286:
280:
276:
273:
272:
266:
262:
259:
258:
252:
247:
246:
240:
235:
234:
228:
224:
221:
220:
212:
208:
204:
201:
196:
187:
182:
180:
175:
173:
168:
167:
164:
157:
154:
149:
147:
146:Lord Nicholls
143:
140:
132:
130:
126:
124:
120:
111:
109:
107:
106:UK labour law
103:
100:
99:
88:
83:
78:
75:Case opinions
73:
69:
66:
62:
58:
54:
51:
48:
44:
40:
35:
30:
27:
19:
505:
501:
491:
471:
464:
444:
437:
407:equality law
394:IRLR 4 (EAT)
389:
377:
365:
349:
335:
321:
307:
295:
283:
269:
255:
243:
231:
215:
151:
144:
136:
127:
115:
97:
96:
95:
26:
536:Categories
429:References
70:, ICR 337
522:0305-9332
403:UK labour
139:Lord Hope
64:Citations
223:IRLR 322
158:See also
133:Judgment
119:SDA 1975
85:Keywords
357:UKSC 15
341:UKHL 55
327:UKHL 11
314:UKHL 48
288:ICR 868
275:UKHL 13
248:AC 1155
236:ICR 755
102:UKHL 11
68:UKHL 11
56:Decided
520:
479:
452:
261:UKHL 6
203:ss 13
112:Facts
104:is a
46:Court
518:ISSN
477:ISBN
450:ISBN
405:and
401:see
205:and
510:doi
207:136
538::
516:.
506:44
504:.
500:.
125:.
524:.
512::
485:.
458:.
185:e
178:t
171:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
