Talk:Ürümqi - Knowledge

607:

easier and less confusing, serving the interests of both the readers and editors. I'm not willing to die on this hill. The move is a suggestion, not a demand. Anyone curious about the English name of the city should search Google books for "Urumqi" and "Ürümqi". There are about 20 times as many occurances of the name without the marks and a good portion of the results which include the marks are actually from wikipedia. Of course searching google without diacritics will always show more results than with the diacritics. Actually looking at the results shows a pretty clear difference. Google Scholar shows an even more dramatic difference. "Ürümqi" is used in some legit English-language sources such as Encyclopedia Britannica and Library of Congress subject headings. Just thought I'd provide some actual info instead of simply declaring that "Urumqi" is the real English name. -

1256: 1096: 405: 1156:. You keep adding of a bunch of coatrack to articles. The examples you gave above do not mention anything about "Han Chinese" destroying "Urumqi", much less a blatant example. UNDUE is based on the proportion of sources. The sources are talking about development by the Chinese government. That is different from "Han Chinese destroying Uyghur culture". You also fail to realise that we go by the proportion of sources. We do not give undue weight to sources having a minority or fringe opinion. -- 243: 1671:

demographics of the place, not stressing on any particular aspect. It is best to just state that it had a mainly Han and Tungan (as per source) population in its early years. You should also make clear that this is the new Urumqi established after the Zunghar genocide. Millward noted that various people were previously imported by the Zunghars into the area (pp.92-93, Eurasian Crossroads). Also please give correct page range in the reference (therefore it's pp. 306–307, p. 260)

395: 368: 579:(same mark), and sometimes vowel pairs are marked like this to indicate a syllable break where a single vowel sound might otherwise be assumed (although this is still very rare and the spellings without the marks is also acceptable), like "naïve". For Urumqi, the pronunciation doesn't differ with the marks and nor do they serve any apparent disambiguation purpose. I am guessing this is from the Uyghur latin alphabet. Here we use the English spelling. see 1965:

authors like Millward that would be in keeping with Knowledge guidelines. This is not saying that Millward had expressed anything that is a POV, but rather we should present what he wrote in such a way that would not be read as a POV. I've already mentioned things like avoiding presenting facts that could be read as a Uyghur vs Han Chinese narrative, or that any ethnic group has a better claim on a city than another. Keep things as neutral as possible.

1844:

unreliable. I also think you misread the sentence, it did not come primarily from the Ji Yun (it seems like Millward use his account largely for detailed information to add local colour in that period). Personally, I would move the information on demographics to the demographics section, and in the history section, give only a broad view. The establishment of Manchu, Mongol and Han Chinese garrisons should be mentioned in the history section.

510: 471: 1459:. Millwards work has been peer reviewed and his statement on Urumqi has not been challenged by fellow scholars and historians. No reputable scholar has written otherwise, no other historian has claimed Urumqi is a Uyghur city and Han migrants destroyed its Uyghur character. Millward's views are the mainstream as they are published in a peer reviewed book from a university press and he has degrees and credentials in history. 294: 276: 829: 203: 234: 304: 1435:

tourists, tourist guidebooks and individuals with no credentials in history. Millward explicitly named tourists as propagators of this view. Fringe views are when scholars views conflict with each other and the majority of scholars condemn a certain view and ostracize and relegate that view to the domain of non peer reviewed publications such as

2013:

It should be noted that historically the composition of the population had been fluid, a snapshot of the region at a particular time may look different. After the Qing dynasty collapsed, many people left the region, although I haven't been able to find the population statistics of the city in that period yet.

999:. We give prominence to views in the proportion to which they have appeared in reliable sources. Millward's view over here doesn't seem to be shared by others: I can't find other sources either propagating the "misconception" or even trying to refute it. If it is a fringe view, we simply exclude it. -- 2012:

I think it looks OK now, although if anyone objects to any particular edit or have questions about them, do let me know. I've moved the information on demographics into its appropriate section, as it would be useful to have some historical information on the demographics of the city in that section.

1874:

I waited for a response before as indicated by the timestamps between August 23 and 26. I did not edit the article until the 26th and my response was there since the 23rd but Lemongirl942 walked off and ignored the conversation assuming that the article would stay at the status quo until the 26th. Is

1688:

is a misrepresentation of the source. Nowhere does it say it was Han and Hui majority city. I'm not sure what Rajmaan is trying to prove here. Millward mentions that the city looked like a "North Chinese" town in its early decades, based primarily on the narrative of the exiled poet. That is far from

719:

Professor Millward is referring to a common misconception. He has qualifications in the area and knows what is common knowledge, and what is not. He has encountered a particular misconception and deemed it notable to be written about in his book which is an RS by virtue of both the credentials of the

2198:

Why is there no mention made here of the persecution of the Uyghur people by the Chinese authorities? This is the capital of the Uyghur région, where reeducation camps or gulags imprison, oppress and brainwash people whose culture and religion is seen as a threat by the centralised China state. This

1670:

Simple statistics is fine, but I would ask that you don't turn it into a Uyghurs vs Han Chinese narrative (therefore don't write line such as "Urumqi had very little Uyghurs while it had many Hui and Han in 1787"). Rather, try to present it in a dispassionate manner, simply giving information on the

1478:

applies proportionally to conflicting views when it comes to scholarly RS sources. Since Millward wrote this and there is no other scholar or historian who holds a view opposing to him, Millard's view makes up 100% of academia's position on this topic. His view is the dominant majority since he is a

1375:

Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources..........In articles specifically relating to a minority

1310:

Foreign tourists in Urumqchi today sometimes complain that the city is "too Chinese" in comparison with the Central Asian atmosphere of southern Xinjiang; many believe Urumchi's East Turkestani culture has been erased by Han immigration and architecture. In fact, the Uyghur population and culture in

2095:

for NYT writes clearly "The government said at least 184 people were killed and 1,100 injured in the violence, with most of the dead being Han, a statement that Uighurs dispute." Hence my revert. Since we have an article on the NYT journalist, I'd AGF and assume he did his research. Additionally, a

606:

which variant of English to use is a settled question for all but some unique edge cases. The concensus boils down to don't change it unless it is clearly relevant to the article content and be consistent within an article. All else being equal I think it is clear that "Urumqi" without the marks is

1367:

to determinte which one outranks the other, in case one viewpoint clashes with each other. If one viewpoint appeared in one RS journal, and another conflicting viewpoint appeared in seven RS journals, the first viewpoint is considered fringe, so one sentence would be devoted to the first viewpoint

574:

How did we end up with the article title spelled with these diareses over the U's? I have never seen this spelling outside of this article and feel that it would be more appropriate to have the article at "Urumqi" since that is the common English-language name for the city. Where did this peculiar

1964:

Instead of arguing over the old edits, it would be better to try to move forward to find acceptable wording and content. It should be noted that an author like Millward has greater freedom to air views and opinions than us editors, where we are required to present facts and indeed the words of

1743:

1 the bishop was primarily a leader of the local community first and foremost, first, firstly, essentially, in essence, fundamentally, principally, predominantly, basically 2 such work is undertaken primarily for large institutions mostly, for the most part, chiefly, mainly, in the main, on the

1210:

You are refusing to answer one of the main points I brought up. Millward talks about demographics in addition to people's misconceptions. He plainly stated that Urumchi's first inhabitants were Han and Hui people and not Uyghurs, which is a fact and not anyone's point of view. The last source I

1434:

It seems you have no idea what the definition of fringe is or what UNDUE is about. Millward's views are not fringe among scholars. Millward's work is peer reviewed. I suggest you look up what peer reviewed means. The claim that Urumqi was a Uyghur city comes from agenda based advocacy groups,

750:

have here - that's to decide whether we keep an article or not. You have to consider that we add viewpoints by their prominence in related literature. We don't add random facts to an article: there has to be cohesion and flow. As far as I can see, I don't see any literature which promotes the

1843:

Sigh! Do calm down and dial back a little. Maybe refrain from editing until the discussion is over? To Lemongirl942I, have no issue with the book, you can read that it relies on many other sources (some of them Chinese, including official statistics), and there is nothing that suggests it is

682:

Professor of Chinese and Central Asian History at Georgetown University, James A. Millward wrote that foreigners often mistakenly think that Urumqi was originally a Uyghur city and that the Chinese destroyed its Uyghur character and culture, however, Urumqi was founded as a Chinese city by

1486:

We use the term fringe theory in a very broad sense to describe an idea that departs significantly from the prevailing views or mainstream views in its particular field. For example, fringe theories in science depart significantly from mainstream science and have little or no scientific

724:, the fact that this misconception itself exists and it was mentioned by Millward makes it notable enough to be included. Urumqi is the capital of "Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region". That alone is enough for assumption of Urumqi as a Uyghur city. The article also mentions ethnic unrest. 830:

It is a legitimate notable topic because tourist guides propagate this misconception "This former Uighur market (Èrdàoqiáo shìchǎng) is no better than a Chinese-run tourist trap these days, but the streets to the north are still the center of Ürümqi's Uighur

2128:

I would be willing to insert an attribution in the case of the NYT article. I hope that's sufficient. I was not aware of this qualification being inserted otherwise. Because the issue is that there are a lot of various Uyghur activist groups out there and

1311:

the city today is a relatively recent feature, for Urumchi in its first decades in most respects rsembled a north Chinese town, populated primarily by Tungan from Gansu and Shaanxi and Han from many Chinese provinces, in addition to the bannermen.

948:

a source for both points- he talks about both the misconception and the facts about the demographics. Both points of view come from his book and there is no rule saying that a single book isn't allowed to source both a misconception and its

1795:

chieflystar mainlystar principallystar above allstar basicallystar especiallystar essentiallystar fundamentallystar generallystar largelystar mostlystar on the wholestar overallstar

777:

There is also the fact that the majority demographics are stated in the source- not just the misconception. The founding demographics are notable, reliably sourced content regardless of who thinks who the majority of the city is or

1984:. This is different from saying it was a "Han and Hui city". The former talks about the population of the city, the latter claims that the city belongs to a population. This is a nuanced position and hence the differentiation. -- 1413:

I see that you have sourced a major part of the history to one particular author. If you are very keen on including Milliward, then the phrasing needs to be appropriate considering that his view is a fringe view. For example,

660:

I'm going to ask Lemongirl942 here exactly what is POV about the demographics of Urumqi at its foundation. I will restore it if no adequate response is given since this is totally unrelated to the other edits you complained

1516:

Millward's views are published in an RS and makes up the prevailing views. And you are again refusing to address the point that the demographics of early Urumqi are a fact and separate from people's misconceptions on the

1258:

Urumqi, an ancient Uyghur city in Xinjiang is being transformed by waves of Han Chinese colonization. Traditional neighborhoods are being levels to make way for high-rise apartment buildings, mainly inhabited by Chinese

2176: 153: 2090:

I'm not even sure why this article is on my watchlist. I just saw the IP edit that at first sight seemed like possible POV pushing, so I took the trouble of checking the source. I can't read Financial Times, but

1098:

1689:

coming to a simplistic conclusion that "it was a Han and Hui majority city". I'm also a bit uncomfortable at solely using one single source for most of the history. I'm looking for alternative sources now. --

1503:

which contradict their own. Opponents to reliable sources will often argue that their opponents reliable sources are FRINGE because they spread false information or have a viewpoint which is not mainstream.

1930:

Milliward, then the phrasing needs to be appropriate considering that his view is a fringe view. For example, Urumqi was originally a Uyghur city and the Chinese destroyed its Uyghur character and culture.

2100:, linked in that section of the Ürümqi article, gives a few claims disputing that Han Chinese were the majority of the dead. FWIW I didn't add the line, just reverted the edit. You might want to talk to 1416:

Urumqi was originally a Uyghur city and the Chinese destroyed its Uyghur character and culture. However, Professor of Chinese and Central Asian History at Georgetown University, James A. Millward, think

1889:

I didn't really walk off. I just move away temporarily when stuff generates more heat than light. Anyway, I'm going to bring others sources soon. Looking for alternative sources is the best solution. --

593:

In the absence of conclusive evidence, I would not mind either variant, but come to think of it, a RM here would not be any more productive than a RM over which national variety of English to use.

2272: 840:-Er Dao Qiao Bazaar: This former Uighur market is no better than a chinese run tourist trap these days, but the streets to the north are still the centre of Urumqi's Uighur community. 2242: 864:

The above is the POV which Professor Millward addressed in his book. It can be added to the article with Millward's source used after to illustrate the opposite POV for balance.

480: 378: 147: 2037:

This deleted line was recently restored. I've tagged it with as I can't do a source review for either of the paywalled sources. Who specifically disputed the statement?

194: 2169: 1713:

Urumchi in its first decades in most respects resembled a north Chinese town, populated primarily by Tungans from Gansu and Shaanxi an Han from many Chinese provinces.

2282: 485: 2267: 2232: 1262:

This source accuses the policy of leveling "traditional neighborhoods" as being part of "Han Chinese colonization", and claims Urumqi is an "ancient Uyghur city".

451: 2287: 2252: 2247: 1448: 247: 79: 2227: 2277: 1376:

viewpoint, such views may receive more attention and space. However, these pages should still make appropriate reference to the majority viewpoint

2262: 2237: 1479:

well known historian in this field, is work was peer reviewed by fellow scholars and nobody challenged or contradicted what he said about Urumqi.

1372:

saying that you need 100 plus sources on a certain point of view in order to include it in the article which is what you seem to be insinuating.

1937:

finding sources and attacked the author as fringe in order to justify entirely reversing what he said without finding any sources to justify it.

1982:

after the Qing established the "new" Urumqi, it was populated primarily by Han from various provinces and Tungans mainly from Gansu and Shaanxi

461: 1049:. His book is peer reviewed by scholars and he can't include random junk and speculation for no reason. Examples of the misconception abound, 2257: 1655: 1629: 1603: 85: 2038: 1307:

Millward's source is about foreigners mistakenly thinking Han immigrants and architecture erased the alleged Uyghur characer of the city:

44: 2292: 640:

This article primarily needs expansion to reach higher classes. As the capital city of a region in China, it is of high importance. --

746:

I don't see any misconception in the article. This is like refuting something which doesn't exist. I'm not sure what relevance does

334: 1045:

Millward is a Professor of Central Asian History and his book was published by a reputable university. Calling his views fringe is

1564:. Urumqi had very little Uyghurs while it had many Hui and Han in 1787. There were 76,496 Uyghurs and 477,321 Han in 1960 Urumqi. 427: 634:, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section. 2222: 1373: 168: 99: 30: 135: 104: 20: 2049:? Some random Uighur shopkeeper that the NYT asked? The source of this statement will have a direct impact on whether it's 1711: 1646: 1620: 1594: 1308: 1056: 1050: 74: 1053: 2184: 1494: 317: 281: 256: 2097: 1741: 559: 418: 373: 65: 526: 190: 426:

related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

202: 185: 129: 1484: 538: 213: 1980:

There's a better way to phrase it so that it is close to what Millward is saying. Millward makes it clear that

1440: 2117: 1051:

this author claims Han are destroying Uyghur culture in Urumqi and that Uyghur architecture there is "ancient"

2165:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

125: 2180: 2046: 1536: 109: 1989: 1894: 1694: 1544: 1424: 1161: 1004: 911: 756: 706: 693:

I'm curious why we need to mention this POV. I don't see anywhere in the article it being mentioned that "

575:

spelling come from? In English, we rarely use such diacritics. Occasionaly German words with preserve the

1508: 1046: 262: 175: 747: 721: 2200: 233: 2204: 2146: 2081: 2058: 608: 584: 161: 55: 2110: 2071: 1811: 1368:

while an entire paragraph would be devoted to the second view point on a Knowledge article. It is

333:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

2134: 2042: 1744:

whole, largely, to a large extent, especially, generally, usually, typically, commonly, as a rule

544: 218: 70: 1778:

1: for the most part : chiefly <has now become primarily a residential town — S. P. B. Mais

1985: 1942: 1890: 1880: 1827: 1690: 1652: 1626: 1600: 1570: 1540: 1522: 1507:

This sounds exactly like what is occurring here. Accusing Millward of being fringe because of

1464: 1420: 1383: 1157: 1107: 1000: 954: 907: 869: 783: 752: 729: 702: 666: 394: 367: 141: 51: 2101: 1444: 839: 836: 540: 509: 330: 215: 1475: 1153: 996: 580: 1759: 2142: 2077: 2054: 1998:

I'll try to tidy up the section when I have the time and get the disputed tag removed.

1456: 1776: 808:

Is this discussion finished? Is there a valid objection to including the demographics?

652:

Last edited at 01:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 11:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

470: 2216: 2161:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

2138: 2131:

the most extreme of them certainly would not constitute reliable sources for anything

2050: 2018: 2003: 1970: 1849: 1676: 1452: 641: 631: 309: 1938: 1876: 1823: 1566: 1518: 1460: 1379: 1103: 950: 865: 779: 725: 662: 410: 24: 2092: 751:"misconception" - so this refuting of the misconception is plain unnecessary. -- 684: 293: 275: 1596:

Beyond the Pass: Economy, Ethnicity, and Empire in Qing Central Asia, 1759-1864

2199:

page should include a chapter about the reality of life here for many people.

1436: 688: 400: 299: 2108:

or track down whoever added the original line (WikiBlame fails here for me).

1793: 2208: 2188: 2150: 2123: 2085: 2062: 2022: 2007: 1993: 1974: 1946: 1898: 1884: 1853: 1831: 1698: 1680: 1574: 1548: 1526: 1468: 1428: 1387: 1165: 1111: 1008: 958: 915: 873: 787: 760: 733: 710: 670: 644: 611: 597: 587: 2014: 1999: 1966: 1845: 1672: 1557: 701:". So I don't see why we need to refute something which doesn't exist. -- 1933:

So you decided how to edit the article and which POV you wanted to take

1359:

You haven't clearly read UNDUE. Its talking about how to give balance

576: 542: 423: 217: 1499:

and edit summaries is often done by POV pushers in an attempt to

2130: 326: 322: 1562:

Urumqi was a Han and Hui majority city in the early Qing period

1054:

another one about Erdaoqiao Bazaar being flooded by Han people

545: 503: 227: 219: 15: 469: 1875:

there a mechanism to make people respond to the discussion?

691:(Tungans), and it is the Uyghurs who are new to the city. 2105: 1928: 1685: 677: 626: 1057:

Another claiming that cities are being swamped by Han.

160: 422:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 321:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 904:Chinese destroyed its Uyghur character and culture 699:Chinese destroyed its Uyghur character and culture 2273:C-Class China-related articles of Top-importance 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 630:, and are posted here for posterity. Following 2175:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 2243:Knowledge level-4 vital articles in Geography 1560:Is this considered a fact based statement? - 1102:This is exactly what Millward was addressing. 624:The comment(s) below were originally left at 553:This page has archives. Sections older than 174: 8: 2098:July 2009 Ürümqi riots#Casualties and damage 1449:Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact theories 583:. I propose we move it back to "Urumqi". - 2076:since they restored the line in question. 1648:Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang 1622:Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang 362: 270: 2170:Flag of Gyeonggi Province (2006–2021).svg 898:Are you kidding me? None of that states " 570:Spelling of article title, why not Urumqi 1152:You have absolutely no understanding of 1651:. Columbia University Press. pp. 260–. 1625:. Columbia University Press. pp. 306–. 1599:. Stanford University Press. pp. 133–. 1585: 1314:This is an exact rebuttal to the above. 364: 272: 231: 2283:Top-importance Chinese cities articles 1211:posted is exactly what he is refuting. 681: 563:when more than 6 sections are present. 2268:Top-importance China-related articles 2233:Knowledge vital articles in Geography 7: 2194:Incomplete and sanitised description 1927:You made your views very clear here 995:the problem. The relevant policy is 416:This article is within the scope of 315:This article is within the scope of 2288:WikiProject Chinese cities articles 2253:C-Class WikiProject Cities articles 2248:C-Class vital articles in Geography 900:Urumqi was originally a Uyghur city 720:author and the publisher. It meets 695:Urumqi was originally a Uyghur city 261:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1095:And a blatant example over here : 14: 632:several discussions in past years 557:may be automatically archived by 2228:Knowledge level-4 vital articles 508: 403: 393: 366: 302: 292: 274: 241: 232: 201: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2278:C-Class Chinese cities articles 456:This article has been rated as 2263:C-Class China-related articles 2238:C-Class level-4 vital articles 2135:some of the more moderate ones 2023:17:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC) 2008:16:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC) 1593:James Millward (1 June 1998). 1: 2033:A figure disputed by Uighurs? 1994:06:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC) 478:This article is supported by 430:and see a list of open tasks. 337:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2258:All WikiProject Cities pages 612:13:09, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 598:17:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 588:14:07, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 481:the Chinese cities workgroup 343:Knowledge:WikiProject Cities 2209:01:54, 13 August 2023 (UTC) 1975:18:03, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 1947:15:47, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 1899:08:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 1885:05:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 1854:15:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1832:14:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1699:14:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1681:13:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1575:02:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 1549:04:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 1527:03:56, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 1469:00:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 1429:23:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC) 1388:05:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC) 1166:04:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC) 1112:03:46, 26 August 2016 (UTC) 1009:03:15, 26 August 2016 (UTC) 959:02:51, 26 August 2016 (UTC) 916:10:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC) 874:09:27, 25 August 2016 (UTC) 788:19:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC) 761:10:42, 23 August 2016 (UTC) 734:10:06, 23 August 2016 (UTC) 711:01:47, 23 August 2016 (UTC) 671:00:31, 23 August 2016 (UTC) 645:01:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 436:Knowledge:WikiProject China 349:WikiProject Cities articles 346:Template:WikiProject Cities 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2309: 2293:WikiProject China articles 1761:for the most part; mainly. 1645:James A. Millward (2007). 1619:James A. Millward (2007). 462:project's importance scale 439:Template:WikiProject China 2189:06:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC) 2151:12:17, 26 July 2019 (UTC) 2124:22:22, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 2086:14:11, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 2063:14:09, 25 July 2019 (UTC) 2053:here. So please clarify. 639: 477: 455: 388: 287: 269: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2137:would, at very least be 1441:9/11 conspiracy theories 2223:C-Class vital articles 1361:conflicting viewpoints 560:Lowercase sigmabot III 474: 442:China-related articles 75:avoid personal attacks 473: 248:level-4 vital article 195:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 2106:added the NYT source 1495:Citing WP:FRINGE in 627:Talk:Ürümqi/Comments 105:No original research 1501:demonize viewpoints 991:And that precisely 2181:Community Tech bot 676:I assume you mean 620:Assessment comment 475: 329:and various other 318:WikiProject Cities 257:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 2116: 1657:978-0-231-13924-3 1631:978-0-231-13924-3 1605:978-0-8047-9792-4 650: 649: 567: 566: 532: 531: 500: 499: 496: 495: 492: 491: 419:WikiProject China 361: 360: 357: 356: 226: 225: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2300: 2120: 2115: 2113: 2096:cursory look at 2075: 1662: 1661: 1642: 1636: 1635: 1616: 1610: 1609: 1590: 1537:WP:WIKILAWYERING 1445:Holocaust denial 680:where you wrote 637: 636: 629: 562: 546: 523: 522: 512: 504: 444: 443: 440: 437: 434: 413: 408: 407: 406: 397: 390: 389: 384: 381: 370: 363: 351: 350: 347: 344: 341: 312: 307: 306: 305: 296: 289: 288: 278: 271: 254: 245: 244: 237: 236: 228: 220: 206: 205: 196: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2308: 2307: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2213: 2212: 2196: 2177:nomination page 2163: 2118: 2111: 2069: 2035: 1726:Definitions of 1667: 1666: 1665: 1658: 1644: 1643: 1639: 1632: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1606: 1592: 1591: 1587: 658: 625: 622: 572: 558: 547: 541: 517: 441: 438: 435: 432: 431: 409: 404: 402: 382: 376: 348: 345: 342: 339: 338: 308: 303: 301: 255:on Knowledge's 252: 242: 222: 221: 216: 193: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2306: 2304: 2296: 2295: 2290: 2285: 2280: 2275: 2270: 2265: 2260: 2255: 2250: 2245: 2240: 2235: 2230: 2225: 2215: 2214: 2195: 2192: 2173: 2172: 2162: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2034: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1664: 1663: 1656: 1637: 1630: 1611: 1604: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1556: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1530: 1529: 1513: 1512: 1509:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 1491: 1490: 1481: 1480: 1472: 1471: 1457:Ancient Aliens 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 739: 738: 737: 736: 714: 713: 657: 654: 648: 647: 621: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 609:Metal lunchbox 601: 600: 585:Metal lunchbox 571: 568: 565: 564: 552: 549: 548: 543: 539: 537: 534: 533: 530: 529: 519: 518: 513: 507: 498: 497: 494: 493: 490: 489: 486:Top-importance 476: 466: 465: 458:Top-importance 454: 448: 447: 445: 428:the discussion 415: 414: 398: 386: 385: 383:Top‑importance 371: 359: 358: 355: 354: 352: 335:the discussion 314: 313: 297: 285: 284: 279: 267: 266: 260: 238: 224: 223: 214: 212: 211: 208: 207: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2305: 2294: 2291: 2289: 2286: 2284: 2281: 2279: 2276: 2274: 2271: 2269: 2266: 2264: 2261: 2259: 2256: 2254: 2251: 2249: 2246: 2244: 2241: 2239: 2236: 2234: 2231: 2229: 2226: 2224: 2221: 2220: 2218: 2211: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2193: 2191: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2171: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2160: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2122: 2121: 2114: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2094: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2073: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2032: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1931: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1815: 1814: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1798: 1797: 1796:predominantly 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1780: 1779: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1763: 1762: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1746: 1745: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1729: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1715: 1714: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1687: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1669: 1668: 1659: 1654: 1650: 1649: 1641: 1638: 1633: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1615: 1612: 1607: 1602: 1598: 1597: 1589: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1563: 1559: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1505: 1502: 1498: 1493: 1492: 1489: 1488: 1483: 1482: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1453:Gavin Menzies 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1371: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1313: 1312: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1261: 1260: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1100: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1058: 1055: 1052: 1048: 1047:YOUDONTLIKEIT 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 960: 956: 952: 947: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 875: 871: 867: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 858: 857: 856: 855: 854: 843: 842: 838: 837: 834: 833: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 789: 785: 781: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 769: 762: 758: 754: 749: 748:WP:NOTABILITY 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 735: 731: 727: 723: 722:WP:NOTABILITY 718: 717: 716: 715: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 690: 686: 679: 675: 674: 673: 672: 668: 664: 655: 653: 646: 643: 638: 635: 633: 628: 619: 613: 610: 605: 604: 603: 602: 599: 596: 592: 591: 590: 589: 586: 582: 578: 569: 561: 556: 551: 550: 536: 535: 528: 525: 524: 521: 520: 516: 511: 506: 505: 502: 487: 484:(assessed as 483: 482: 472: 468: 467: 463: 459: 453: 450: 449: 446: 429: 425: 421: 420: 412: 401: 399: 396: 392: 391: 387: 380: 375: 372: 369: 365: 353: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 319: 311: 310:Cities portal 300: 298: 295: 291: 290: 286: 283: 280: 277: 273: 268: 264: 258: 250: 249: 239: 235: 230: 229: 210: 209: 204: 200: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2197: 2174: 2164: 2109: 2036: 1986:Lemongirl942 1981: 1963: 1934: 1929: 1891:Lemongirl942 1822: 1812: 1794: 1777: 1760: 1742: 1727: 1712: 1691:Lemongirl942 1647: 1640: 1621: 1614: 1595: 1588: 1580: 1565: 1561: 1555: 1541:Lemongirl942 1504: 1500: 1496: 1485: 1421:Lemongirl942 1415: 1412: 1374: 1369: 1364: 1360: 1309: 1257: 1158:Lemongirl942 1097: 1001:Lemongirl942 992: 945: 908:Lemongirl942 903: 902:" and that " 899: 841: 835: 832: 753:Lemongirl942 703:Lemongirl942 698: 697:" and that " 694: 659: 656:Demographics 651: 623: 594: 573: 554: 514: 501: 479: 457: 417: 411:China portal 316: 263:WikiProjects 246: 198: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2141:inclusion. 2102:Muzzleflash 2093:Edward Wong 1728:"primarily" 1497:discussions 1259:immigrants. 949:refutation. 331:settlements 148:free images 31:not a forum 2217:Categories 1581:References 1437:Flat Earth 1417:otherwise. 1365:proportion 831:community. 2201:LoloWik63 2143:Simonm223 2078:Simonm223 2055:Simonm223 1363:by using 944:Millward 678:this edit 527:Archive 1 251:is rated 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2072:Daß Wölf 2068:Pinging 1813:mainly: 1487:support. 1476:WP:UNDUE 1154:WP:UNDUE 997:WP:UNDUE 642:Danaman5 581:WP:PLACE 515:Archives 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1939:Rajmaan 1877:Rajmaan 1824:Rajmaan 1567:Rajmaan 1519:Rajmaan 1461:Rajmaan 1380:Rajmaan 1104:Rajmaan 951:Rajmaan 866:Rajmaan 780:Rajmaan 726:Rajmaan 663:Rajmaan 555:60 days 460:on the 253:C-class 199:60 days 154:WP refs 142:scholar 2139:WP:DUE 2133:while 2051:WP:DUE 1935:before 1517:topic. 661:about. 577:umlaut 379:Cities 340:Cities 323:cities 282:Cities 259:scale. 126:Google 25:Ürümqi 2043:ETNFC 906:". -- 433:China 424:China 374:China 327:towns 240:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2205:talk 2185:talk 2147:talk 2119:Wölf 2104:who 2082:talk 2059:talk 2039:ETIM 2019:talk 2004:talk 1990:talk 1971:talk 1943:talk 1895:talk 1881:talk 1850:talk 1828:talk 1695:talk 1686:This 1677:talk 1653:ISBN 1627:ISBN 1601:ISBN 1571:talk 1545:talk 1535:See 1523:talk 1465:talk 1455:and 1425:talk 1419:" -- 1384:talk 1162:talk 1108:talk 1005:talk 955:talk 912:talk 870:talk 784:talk 778:was. 757:talk 730:talk 707:talk 687:and 667:talk 595:GotR 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2179:. — 2112:Daß 2047:TIP 2015:Hzh 2000:Hzh 1967:Hzh 1846:Hzh 1673:Hzh 1558:Hzh 1370:not 1099:... 689:Hui 685:Han 452:Top 176:TWL 2219:: 2207:) 2187:) 2149:) 2084:) 2061:) 2045:? 2041:? 2021:) 2006:) 1992:) 1973:) 1945:) 1897:) 1883:) 1852:) 1830:) 1697:) 1679:) 1573:) 1547:) 1539:-- 1525:) 1467:) 1451:, 1447:, 1443:, 1439:, 1427:) 1386:) 1164:) 1110:) 1007:) 993:is 957:) 946:is 914:) 872:) 786:) 759:) 732:) 709:) 669:) 488:). 377:: 325:, 197:: 156:) 54:; 2203:( 2183:( 2145:( 2080:( 2074:: 2070:@ 2057:( 2017:( 2002:( 1988:( 1969:( 1941:( 1893:( 1879:( 1848:( 1826:( 1730:. 1693:( 1675:( 1660:. 1634:. 1608:. 1569:( 1543:( 1521:( 1511:. 1463:( 1423:( 1414:" 1382:( 1160:( 1106:( 1003:( 953:( 910:( 868:( 782:( 755:( 728:( 705:( 665:( 464:. 265:: 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index