Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:.41 Swiss

Source 📝

581: 597: 565: 450: 283: 262: 231: 522: 511: 500: 21: 390: 355: 489: 478: 711:
I've no sources for any of this. The ancient rifle shooters I've asked have vaguely heard of the Vetterli as a historical thing, but no-one has one. The deer shooters (I only know one UK deer shooter) wouldn't even think about it, as most of our deer are shot at long range on open moorland, with
707:
What was .41 Swiss anyway (the centrefire version at least)? If this was centrefire, was it for the Italian Vetterli (centrefire) rather than the original Swiss (rimfire) rifle? That's a slightly different cartridge, although close enough that still calling it ".41" is credible. Were these for
726:♠"is "Swiss" worth inclusion" If it's 10.4mm etc, there's an option to stop there, or go all the way to the official Swiss Army designation (which Barnes' 'graph on it does); that seems a bit overkill, but it's the official name, so... In that event, "Swiss" falls out by default. 729:♠"Is R for Rimmed or for Rimfire"? It's rimmed. There are dozens of rounds, all centerfire, with that suffix, currently for sale in Europe. It's to distinguish from semi-rimmed & rimless cases (which, AIUI, are really just names for the designs, not factually accurate). 572: 365: 801:
If .41 Swiss is a different cartridge though, and only usable through Italian centrefire Vetterlis, then it's a bad name for the original Swiss rifles. It wouldn't be the first time that a calibre name means the complete opposite of what it appears to.
773:♠"What shoots 1960s .41 Swiss centrefire?" No idea. I imagine there were rifles originally chambered for it after the CF version was introduced, so there may be original Swiss Army Vetterlis; some shooters may just like the ballistics, & have their 604: 373: 858: 863: 703:
Is R for Rimmed or for Rimfire though? Why label a cartridge as "rimmed"? Everything was, back then. Rimfire was somewhat unusual for rifles though, and this was a major difference between Swiss and Italian
193: 732:♠"What was .41 Swiss anyway"? My understanding is, it covers both the RF & CF variant, just as the 10.4x38mmR does; they'd be dabbed "(rimfire)" & "(centerfire)". The only difference is the name. 700:(or anything similar - is "Swiss" worth inclusion?) I think COMMONNAME here would still apply to its original name in Switzerland, it doesn't seem to have been popular enough in the US to over-ride this. 588: 369: 878: 883: 463: 440: 402: 753:
So if it's R for Rimmed, was that an original name, or a later suffix? My point is that it seems odd to label a cartridge as "rimmed" at a time when all cartridges were.
449: 187: 853: 430: 119: 337: 843: 327: 397: 360: 125: 303: 868: 848: 299: 873: 838: 406: 635:
should be merged here because it's lacking references & the page title is wrong (it means rimmed, not rimfire, & it's 10.4x38mmR).
70: 139: 84: 290: 267: 144: 60: 114: 47: 242: 105: 208: 175: 654: 650: 632: 149: 248: 401:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 298:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the
676: 230: 169: 807: 761: 717: 662: 95: 774: 110: 165: 794: 745: 689: 641: 33: 739:
the link); Barnes says its a bit marginal for deer, so no wonder it's not in open-field use much.
201: 40:
on October 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see
215: 697: 680: 770:♠"was that an original name" Maybe not, but that's what it's called now; my source doesn't say. 803: 757: 713: 658: 91: 778: 756:
What shoots 1960s .41 Swiss centrefire? A Swiss Vetterli, modified, or an Italian Vetterli?
580: 789: 740: 684: 636: 596: 181: 832: 564: 679:, .41 Swiss would seem to be the title of choice. If they should be merged as 282: 261: 64: 37: 295: 389: 354: 811: 796: 782: 765: 748: 721: 712:
field artillery, rather than by close-up stalking in woodland.
691: 666: 643: 788:♠These points really aren't about a merge, however, are they? 735:♠Apparently, this round was only used in the Swiss Vetterlis ( 224: 55: 15: 859:
Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
864:
Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
595: 579: 563: 448: 657:. So the merged article ought to end up under that name. 42: 28: 200: 675:
As already noted, that title is incorrect, & per
461:
This article has been checked against the following
294:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 573:
Military science, technology, and theory task force
546: 460: 214: 73:for general discussion of the article's subject. 879:Start-Class European military history articles 708:converted Swiss rifles, or for Italian rifles? 884:European military history task force articles 8: 415:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 653:. Per this article, the "official" name is 46:; for the discussion at that location, see 543: 457: 349: 256: 228: 395:This article is within the scope of the 351: 258: 405:. To use this banner, please see the 854:Start-Class military history articles 418:Template:WikiProject Military history 7: 605:European military history task force 312:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Firearms 288:This article is within the scope of 247:It is of interest to the following 63:for discussing improvements to the 14: 90:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 844:Low-importance Firearms articles 649:The original name appears to be 520: 509: 498: 487: 476: 388: 353: 281: 260: 229: 85:Click here to start a new topic. 19: 435:This article has been rated as 332:This article has been rated as 667:21:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC) 644:03:35, 30 September 2017 (UTC) 1: 869:Start-Class weaponry articles 849:WikiProject Firearms articles 315:Template:WikiProject Firearms 82:Put new text under old text. 874:Weaponry task force articles 839:Stub-Class Firearms articles 398:Military history WikiProject 812:10:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC) 797:09:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC) 766:09:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC) 749:06:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC) 722:12:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC) 692:11:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC) 900: 481:Referencing and citation: 338:project's importance scale 603: 587: 571: 542: 434: 421:military history articles 383: 331: 276: 255: 120:Be welcoming to newcomers 655:10.4×38mm Swiss Rimfire 651:10.4×38mm Swiss Rimfire 633:10.4×38mm Swiss Rimfire 547:Associated task forces: 492:Coverage and accuracy: 29:10.4×38mm_Swiss_Rimfire 785:chambered for it, IDK. 600: 584: 568: 525:Supporting materials: 453: 237:This article is rated 115:avoid personal attacks 599: 583: 567: 452: 241:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 140:Neutral point of view 26:The contents of the 683:, I wouldn't beef. 291:WikiProject Firearms 145:No original research 589:Weaponry task force 514:Grammar and style: 467:for B-class status: 696:I'd be happy with 601: 585: 569: 454: 403:list of open tasks 302:and see a list of 243:content assessment 126:dispute resolution 87: 779:Weatherby Mark Vs 622: 621: 618: 617: 614: 613: 610: 609: 538: 537: 494:criterion not met 483:criterion not met 439:on the project's 407:full instructions 348: 347: 344: 343: 318:Firearms articles 223: 222: 106:Assume good faith 83: 54: 53: 891: 792: 743: 687: 639: 554: 544: 528: 524: 523: 517: 513: 512: 506: 502: 501: 495: 491: 490: 484: 480: 479: 458: 423: 422: 419: 416: 413: 412:Military history 392: 385: 384: 379: 376: 361:Military history 357: 350: 320: 319: 316: 313: 310: 285: 278: 277: 272: 264: 257: 240: 234: 233: 225: 219: 218: 204: 135:Article policies 56: 45: 23: 22: 16: 899: 898: 894: 893: 892: 890: 889: 888: 829: 828: 790: 741: 685: 637: 630: 552: 526: 521: 515: 510: 504: 499: 493: 488: 482: 477: 420: 417: 414: 411: 410: 377: 363: 317: 314: 311: 308: 307: 270: 238: 161: 156: 155: 154: 131: 101: 41: 20: 12: 11: 5: 897: 895: 887: 886: 881: 876: 871: 866: 861: 856: 851: 846: 841: 831: 830: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 786: 775:Winchester 94s 771: 754: 733: 730: 727: 709: 705: 701: 670: 669: 629: 623: 620: 619: 616: 615: 612: 611: 608: 607: 602: 592: 591: 586: 576: 575: 570: 560: 559: 557: 555: 549: 548: 540: 539: 536: 535: 533: 531: 530: 529: 518: 507: 496: 485: 471: 470: 468: 455: 445: 444: 433: 427: 426: 424: 393: 381: 380: 358: 346: 345: 342: 341: 334:Low-importance 330: 324: 323: 321: 286: 274: 273: 271:Low‑importance 265: 253: 252: 246: 235: 221: 220: 158: 157: 153: 152: 147: 142: 133: 132: 130: 129: 122: 117: 108: 102: 100: 99: 88: 79: 78: 75: 74: 68: 52: 51: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 896: 885: 882: 880: 877: 875: 872: 870: 867: 865: 862: 860: 857: 855: 852: 850: 847: 845: 842: 840: 837: 836: 834: 813: 809: 805: 800: 799: 798: 795: 793: 787: 784: 780: 776: 772: 769: 768: 767: 763: 759: 755: 752: 751: 750: 746: 744: 738: 734: 731: 728: 725: 724: 723: 719: 715: 710: 706: 702: 699: 695: 694: 693: 690: 688: 682: 678: 674: 673: 672: 671: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 647: 646: 645: 642: 640: 634: 627: 624: 606: 598: 594: 593: 590: 582: 578: 577: 574: 566: 562: 561: 558: 556: 551: 550: 545: 541: 534: 532: 527:criterion met 519: 516:criterion met 508: 505:criterion met 497: 486: 475: 474: 473: 472: 469: 466: 465: 459: 456: 451: 447: 446: 442: 441:quality scale 438: 432: 429: 428: 425: 408: 404: 400: 399: 394: 391: 387: 386: 382: 375: 371: 367: 362: 359: 356: 352: 339: 335: 329: 326: 325: 322: 305: 301: 297: 293: 292: 287: 284: 280: 279: 275: 269: 266: 263: 259: 254: 250: 244: 236: 232: 227: 226: 217: 213: 210: 207: 203: 199: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 167: 164: 163:Find sources: 160: 159: 151: 150:Verifiability 148: 146: 143: 141: 138: 137: 136: 127: 123: 121: 118: 116: 112: 109: 107: 104: 103: 97: 93: 92:Learn to edit 89: 86: 81: 80: 77: 76: 72: 66: 62: 58: 57: 49: 48:its talk page 44: 39: 35: 31: 30: 25: 18: 17: 804:Andy Dingley 758:Andy Dingley 747:06:40 & 736: 714:Andy Dingley 659:Andy Dingley 631: 625: 462: 436: 396: 333: 289: 249:WikiProjects 211: 205: 197: 190: 184: 178: 172: 162: 134: 59:This is the 27: 503:Structure: 437:Start-class 378:Start‑class 188:free images 71:not a forum 43:its history 833:Categories 791:TREKphiler 742:TREKphiler 698:10.4x38mmR 686:TREKphiler 681:10.4x38mmR 677:Commonname 638:TREKphiler 626:E pluribus 366:Technology 304:open tasks 300:discussion 239:Stub-class 32:page were 128:if needed 111:Be polite 65:.41 Swiss 61:talk page 38:.41 Swiss 464:criteria 374:European 370:Weaponry 309:Firearms 296:firearms 268:Firearms 96:get help 69:This is 67:article. 704:rifles? 336:on the 194:WP refs 182:scholar 245:scale. 166:Google 34:merged 783:SAKOs 431:Start 209:JSTOR 170:books 124:Seek 36:into 808:talk 762:talk 718:talk 663:talk 628:ammo 202:FENS 176:news 113:and 781:or 777:or 737:per 328:Low 216:TWL 835:: 810:) 764:) 720:) 665:) 553:/ 372:/ 368:/ 364:: 196:) 94:; 806:( 760:( 716:( 661:( 443:. 409:. 340:. 306:. 251:: 212:· 206:· 198:· 191:· 185:· 179:· 173:· 168:( 98:. 50:.

Index

10.4×38mm_Swiss_Rimfire
merged
.41 Swiss
its history
its talk page
talk page
.41 Swiss
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.