Knowledge

Talk:16th Sustainment Brigade/GA1

Source 📝

191: 401: 387: 356: 332: 305: 295: 270: 256: 242: 424: 148: 134: 183:
The last paragraph of the "Activation" section gets a little confusing to me. The paragraph starts off by talking about what is going to happen with the brigade in the future, but then switches to discussing past operations. Could this be moved around so it is a bit more chronological, like the
160:
I removed the links to the battalion sized units since articles about them are unlikely to be made; however I left the Command sized unit redlinks because those formations are much larger and it is very likely that articles about them will be made.
429:
Another nice article! There are just a couple of prose/MOS issues that I would like to see fixed before I pass the article, so I am going to place it on hold. Please let me know if you have any questions.
73: 69: 54: 46: 155:
There are quite a few red links sprinkled throughout the article. Like with the 166th - if they're going to become articles, leave them; if they're not, please remove them.
62: 39: 112: 106: 379: 262: 464:
Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article to GA status. Nice work, and thanks again for the prompt response.
17: 140: 23: 228: 469: 453: 435: 205: 170: 95: 444:
I have responded to your comments. Please let me know if there is anything else that needs doing.
465: 431: 369: 91: 473: 459: 439: 211: 176: 99: 318: 190: 451: 393: 203: 168: 248: 446: 198: 163: 90:
And I'll take this one too! Should have the review up in a bit...
81: 50: 24:Talk:16th Sustainment Brigade (United States)/GA1 8: 378:(images are tagged and non-free images have 7: 423: 373:, where possible and appropriate. 147: 133: 31: 422: 399: 385: 354: 330: 327:Fair representation without bias 303: 293: 268: 254: 240: 189: 146: 132: 1: 18:Talk:16th Sustainment Brigade 400: 386: 355: 331: 304: 294: 269: 255: 241: 474:21:52, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 460:19:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 440:16:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 212:19:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 177:19:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 100:15:33, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 498: 122:reasonably well written 392:(appropriate use with 367:It is illustrated by 319:neutral point of view 283:broad in its coverage 184:rest of the section? 380:fair use rationales 224:factually accurate 394:suitable captions 351:No edit wars etc. 22:(Redirected from 489: 449: 426: 425: 403: 402: 389: 388: 358: 357: 334: 333: 307: 306: 297: 296: 272: 271: 258: 257: 249:reliable sources 244: 243: 201: 193: 166: 150: 149: 136: 135: 86: 77: 58: 27: 497: 496: 492: 491: 490: 488: 487: 486: 456: 447: 316:It follows the 290:(major aspects) 208: 199: 173: 164: 67: 44: 38: 36: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 495: 493: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 455:(Hall of Fame) 454: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 247:(citations to 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 207:(Hall of Fame) 206: 186: 185: 180: 179: 172:(Hall of Fame) 171: 157: 156: 117: 116: 87: 35: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 494: 475: 471: 467: 463: 462: 461: 458: 457: 452: 450: 443: 442: 441: 437: 433: 428: 427: 420: 417: 416: 414: 411: 405: 404: 397: 395: 383: 381: 375: 374: 372: 371: 366: 360: 359: 352: 349: 348: 346: 342: 336: 335: 328: 325: 324: 322: 320: 315: 309: 308: 301: 291: 287: 286: 284: 280: 274: 273: 266: 264: 252: 250: 238: 234: 233: 231: 230: 225: 221: 213: 210: 209: 204: 202: 196: 192: 188: 187: 182: 181: 178: 175: 174: 169: 167: 159: 158: 154: 153: 152: 151: 144: 142: 130: 126: 125: 123: 119: 118: 115:for criteria) 114: 110: 108: 104: 103: 102: 101: 97: 93: 88: 85: 84: 80: 75: 71: 66: 65: 61: 56: 52: 48: 43: 42: 33: 25: 19: 445: 418: 412: 391: 377: 368: 350: 344: 326: 317: 299: 289: 282: 260: 246: 237:(references) 236: 227: 223: 197: 194: 162: 138: 128: 121: 105: 89: 82: 78: 64:Article talk 63: 59: 40: 37: 466:Dana boomer 432:Dana boomer 92:Dana boomer 51:visual edit 229:verifiable 419:Pass/Fail 300:(focused) 34:GA Review 413:Overall 129:(prose) 74:history 55:history 41:Article 370:images 345:stable 343:It is 321:policy 281:It is 222:It is 120:It is 109:review 195:Fixed 111:(see 83:Watch 16:< 470:talk 436:talk 226:and 113:here 96:talk 70:edit 47:edit 448:Ed! 200:Ed! 165:Ed! 141:MoS 472:) 438:) 421:: 415:: 398:: 390:b 384:: 376:a 353:: 347:. 329:: 323:. 302:: 298:b 292:: 288:a 285:. 267:: 263:OR 259:c 253:: 245:b 239:: 235:a 232:. 145:: 137:b 131:: 127:a 124:. 107:GA 98:) 72:| 53:| 49:| 468:( 434:( 396:) 382:) 265:) 261:( 251:) 143:) 139:( 94:( 79:· 76:) 68:( 60:· 57:) 45:( 26:)

Index

Talk:16th Sustainment Brigade
Talk:16th Sustainment Brigade (United States)/GA1
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Dana boomer
talk
15:33, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
GA
here
MoS
Ed!

(Hall of Fame)
19:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Ed!

(Hall of Fame)
19:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
verifiable
reliable sources
OR
neutral point of view
images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.