Knowledge

Talk:2.0 (film)

Source 📝

513: 380: 310: 286: 224: 435: 408: 320: 255: 445: 695:
The panel was set up after a Parliament member raised the issue of ill effects of mobile towers on birds in the Lok Sabha. After an exhaustive study of the published scientific papers – the 88-page report carries a bibliography running into 55 pages – the panel concluded that there are no long-term
616:
2.0 and bahubali collection straight away mentioned as 699.89 and 599.72 why the partiality shown by wiki for these 2 southern films.anyone can answer hindi films collection taken lowest and highest(Example 548 and 584 mentionedas 548-584) for these 2 films low collection only taken.for Example why
684:
The subject of the film, mobile phone radiation affecting birds, is just an urban legend, and is not endorsed by scientists. This article published by National Audubon Society addresses the topic, and also mentions the impact created by this film (2.0) in spreading the conspiracy theory further.
691:
Indian ornithologist, Asad Rahmani, former director of Bombay Naturalist Society, who also headed the parliament panel to study the ill effects of mobile phone radiation on birds, said "There is no scientific proof between electromagnetic radiation and absence of sparrows."
720:
Apart from the fact that the theme of the movie is totally unscientific, the ornithologist character who is the antagonist in the film, utters several statements which are factually wrong, and those need to be pointed out
661:, hence it was removed. Most of south Indian films used IBT as one of the sources quoting a higher range, which is why it got removed in many articles when IBT sourced content were deleted en masse per consensus. - 166: 742: 705:
In addition to creating a new section to talk about this, the reference numbered "e" in the Notes section has to be removed, as the links there are just sensational articles, ignoring actual science.
808: 696:
data available on the environmental impacts of electromagnetic radiation and studies on the impact of radiation on birds and other wildlife are almost non-existent in India.
522: 418: 389: 296: 743:
https://www.filmcompanion.in/features/tamil-features/straight-out-of-whatsapp-university-a-birdwatchers-reading-of-shankars-20-rajinikanth-jigarthanda-doublex-akshay-kumar
798: 215: 160: 803: 527: 813: 778: 738:
The depictions of birds are incorrect too. Birds from other continents are all shown in Chennai, with barely any Indian birds being depicted in the film.
92: 773: 568:
there are many speculation on the final collection but the estimate of 665 is verified by other independent trackers like pinkvilla and cinetrak
793: 503: 493: 98: 818: 783: 57: 596:
and it says 699 crore. Since your one is from 2019, it is possible the aggregate one is latest and displayes the latest figures. -
788: 338: 112: 43: 768: 117: 33: 350: 342: 87: 646: 617:
you cant taken bahibali as 599-650 highest reported and 2.0 699.89 to 800 highest reported. Rule should be same for all
266: 181: 468: 458: 413: 78: 148: 666: 601: 346: 333: 291: 223: 198: 211: 207: 203: 700: 234: 122: 573: 142: 741:
I am not sure if I myself can link my article here, but all of these have been covered in this article:
662: 597: 563: 272: 585: 569: 512: 634: 622: 618: 138: 745: 706: 254: 749: 735:
controls the monsoons in North India, and that monsoons fail if the birds do not migrate in a year.
710: 686: 658: 591: 557: 174: 68: 239: 83: 594: 188: 64: 236: 379: 732: 593:
dated 14 February 2019 says 656 crore. The current one is also from 'Box Office India'
154: 762: 728:
visits Vedanthangal Sanctuary in India, which is not true, as it doesn't visit India.
654: 650: 450: 337:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 725: 325: 440: 315: 309: 285: 37: 701:
https://www.deccanherald.com/india/rajni-movie-20-does-cell-phone-705685.html
681:
We need a new section to talk about the misinformation spread by this film.
434: 407: 354: 238: 466:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 753: 714: 670: 626: 605: 577: 463: 687:
https://www.audubon.org/news/no-5g-radio-waves-do-not-kill-birds
558:
https://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=4721
248: 240: 28: 15: 511: 378: 645:
article also had a range "699.89 to 800", but the source (
562:
box office india being a reliable source according to
173: 649:) that supported 800 crore was deemed unreliable at 639:There is no partiality. We always use ranges. The 809:B-Class Indian cinema articles of Mid-importance 462:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 46:for general discussion of the article's subject. 353:. To improve this article, please refer to the 187: 8: 402: 349:. To use this banner, please refer to the 280: 799:B-Class India articles of Mid-importance 612:Regarding highest grossing indian films 404: 282: 252: 804:Mid-importance Indian cinema articles 7: 456:This article is within the scope of 331:This article is within the scope of 554:it should be changed to 665 crores 271:It is of interest to the following 36:for discussing improvements to the 814:WikiProject Indian cinema articles 14: 779:Indian cinema task force articles 550:Box office collection in info box 387:This article is supported by the 443: 433: 406: 347:regional and topical task forces 318: 308: 284: 253: 222: 58:Click here to start a new topic. 590:Your 'Box Office India' source 498:This article has been rated as 774:B-Class Indian cinema articles 1: 794:Mid-importance India articles 520:This article is supported by 55:Put new text under old text. 671:12:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC) 647:International Business Times 627:08:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC) 606:15:57, 25 October 2023 (UTC) 578:14:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC) 754:07:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 715:07:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 523:the Indian cinema workgroup 478:Knowledge:WikiProject India 63:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 835: 819:WikiProject India articles 699:Source of the above info: 504:project's importance scale 481:Template:WikiProject India 363:Knowledge:WikiProject Film 784:WikiProject Film articles 519: 497: 428: 386: 366:Template:WikiProject Film 303: 279: 93:Be welcoming to newcomers 22:Skip to table of contents 390:Indian cinema task force 21: 789:B-Class India articles 516: 383: 261:This article is rated 88:avoid personal attacks 769:B-Class film articles 515: 382: 216:Auto-archiving period 113:Neutral point of view 677:Scientific Criticism 118:No original research 339:join the discussion 731:2. He claims that 517: 384: 267:content assessment 99:dispute resolution 60: 542: 541: 538: 537: 534: 533: 459:WikiProject India 401: 400: 397: 396: 341:and see lists of 247: 246: 79:Assume good faith 56: 27: 26: 826: 663:Fylindfotberserk 638: 598:Fylindfotberserk 589: 486: 485: 482: 479: 476: 453: 448: 447: 446: 437: 430: 429: 424: 421: 410: 403: 371: 370: 367: 364: 361: 334:WikiProject Film 328: 323: 322: 321: 312: 305: 304: 299: 288: 281: 264: 258: 257: 249: 241: 227: 226: 217: 192: 191: 177: 108:Article policies 29: 16: 834: 833: 829: 828: 827: 825: 824: 823: 759: 758: 679: 632: 614: 583: 552: 483: 480: 477: 474: 473: 449: 444: 442: 422: 416: 368: 365: 362: 359: 358: 324: 319: 317: 294: 265:on Knowledge's 262: 243: 242: 237: 214: 134: 129: 128: 127: 104: 74: 12: 11: 5: 832: 830: 822: 821: 816: 811: 806: 801: 796: 791: 786: 781: 776: 771: 761: 760: 757: 756: 739: 736: 733:Jacobin Cuckoo 729: 722: 678: 675: 674: 673: 613: 610: 609: 608: 564:WP:ICTFSOURCES 551: 548: 546: 540: 539: 536: 535: 532: 531: 528:Mid-importance 518: 508: 507: 500:Mid-importance 496: 490: 489: 487: 484:India articles 455: 454: 438: 426: 425: 423:Mid‑importance 411: 399: 398: 395: 394: 385: 375: 374: 372: 330: 329: 313: 301: 300: 289: 277: 276: 270: 259: 245: 244: 235: 233: 232: 229: 228: 194: 193: 131: 130: 126: 125: 120: 115: 106: 105: 103: 102: 95: 90: 81: 75: 73: 72: 61: 52: 51: 48: 47: 41: 25: 24: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 831: 820: 817: 815: 812: 810: 807: 805: 802: 800: 797: 795: 792: 790: 787: 785: 782: 780: 777: 775: 772: 770: 767: 766: 764: 755: 751: 747: 744: 740: 737: 734: 730: 727: 724:1. He claims 723: 719: 718: 717: 716: 712: 708: 703: 702: 697: 693: 689: 688: 682: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 644: 643: 636: 631: 630: 629: 628: 624: 620: 611: 607: 603: 599: 595: 592: 587: 582: 581: 580: 579: 575: 571: 566: 565: 560: 559: 555: 549: 547: 544: 529: 526:(assessed as 525: 524: 514: 510: 509: 505: 501: 495: 492: 491: 488: 471: 470: 465: 461: 460: 452: 441: 439: 436: 432: 431: 427: 420: 415: 412: 409: 405: 392: 391: 381: 377: 376: 373: 369:film articles 356: 352: 351:documentation 348: 344: 340: 336: 335: 327: 316: 314: 311: 307: 306: 302: 298: 293: 290: 287: 283: 278: 274: 268: 260: 256: 251: 250: 231: 230: 225: 221: 213: 209: 205: 202: 200: 196: 195: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 133: 132: 124: 123:Verifiability 121: 119: 116: 114: 111: 110: 109: 100: 96: 94: 91: 89: 85: 82: 80: 77: 76: 70: 66: 65:Learn to edit 62: 59: 54: 53: 50: 49: 45: 39: 35: 31: 30: 23: 20: 18: 17: 704: 698: 694: 690: 683: 680: 659:WP:CONSENSUS 641: 640: 615: 567: 561: 556: 553: 545: 543: 521: 499: 469:project page 467: 457: 451:India portal 388: 332: 273:WikiProjects 219: 197: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 107: 32:This is the 726:Arctic Tern 586:Prasanna203 570:Prasanna203 326:Film portal 161:free images 44:not a forum 763:Categories 635:Rajesh1900 619:Rajesh1900 355:guidelines 343:open tasks 38:2.0 (film) 746:Amaravind 707:Amaravind 101:if needed 84:Be polite 34:talk page 199:Archives 69:get help 42:This is 40:article. 502:on the 263:B-class 167:WP refs 155:scholar 655:WP:RSP 651:WP:RSN 419:Cinema 297:Indian 269:scale. 220:4 days 139:Google 475:India 464:India 414:India 182:JSTOR 143:books 97:Seek 750:talk 721:too. 711:talk 667:talk 657:per 623:talk 602:talk 574:talk 360:Film 345:and 292:Film 175:FENS 149:news 86:and 642:2.0 494:Mid 189:TWL 765:: 752:) 713:) 669:) 625:) 604:) 576:) 530:). 417:: 295:: 218:: 210:, 206:, 169:) 67:; 748:( 709:( 665:( 653:/ 637:: 633:@ 621:( 600:( 588:: 584:@ 572:( 506:. 472:. 393:. 357:. 275:: 212:3 208:2 204:1 201:: 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 71:.

Index

Skip to table of contents
talk page
2.0 (film)
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1
2
3

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.