923:
it is particularly relevant. Second, the reason it doesn't include context about voter turnout is because that was not known until 1 or 2 days ago. I agree this should be updated and I will attempt to take in people's suggestions to help contextualize it better. My suggestion is that people try to improve articles themselves rather than just post instructions for other people. Also, deleting important information just because on has a 'pro-voting' political agenda or because that particular person has not heard of the issue at hand, does not mean it is justifiable to do so. Knowledge (XXG) is meant to be a public resource where people can find a range of information on a particular topic. Deleting opposing viewpoints hinders the democracy that is meant to be practiced here. Finally, using
527:. In the current climate of SA politics, I find it weird, given that SA doesn't have separate presidential elections; the ruling party just picks its own candidate for president when they win the majority in parliament. But since the DA is ran by Helen Zille (the mayor of Cape Town) and led in parliament by Sandra Botha (leader of Opposition), then is it appropriate to replace Zille's picture with Seremane's picture (if one can be found and uploaded)? I can understand that Zuma's picture is up there since the ANC says that the president of the party is to become the president of the country automatically if 1) the party gains a majority and 2) once Zuma is installed as an MP. --
748:
the ID). The ANC probably lost its votes to COPE (who probably took from the UDM). The ANC probably lost all its white votes (due to Zuma), but expanded (despite COPE) its black vote - especially among Zulus, conservatives, the young, and the poor. Since we can't put COPE in the infobox; and usability studies show most people only read headlines, subs, tables, graphs, captions - with very few reading the actual text to the end; how can we fix the infobox? Summaries of (HSRC?) exit polls when they come out? Anyone know where the 1.3% Christian (-0.79, -0.38, -0.13) (more than the 5th biggest party) votes went? --
1082:
concerned not with why he wanted to boycott the vote but with the fact that he, at first, was going to do so. Regardless, using this definition, I quote from the article: "Keep in mind that in determining proper weight we consider a viewpoint's prevalence in reliable sources, not its prevalence among
Knowledge (XXG) editors." Just because one person might call it a minor issue does not mean it is. I have shown there are many sources available on this topic and there are hundreds more available in print that are not online - most of the information on this topic does not get put online.
359:
338:
212:
278:
260:
369:
447:
229:
190:
975:" at the very least. Then we should shorten the previous sentence about the "No land no house no vote". And yes, WP:FRINGE was created to avoid marginal scientific views from getting undue weight compared to with mainstream ideas in science articles. But we can certainly use it as a framework here - we shouldn't give excessive weight to marginal issues.
630:. As you probably know, 8-12%, as the second article predicts, is a good amount of the vote in a SA election. 8-12% would place the party as top competition for the "official opposition" title in the next parliament. Taking COPE out just because it hasn't run in a general election yet is harmful to those seeking to understand the election.--
1396:
This article needs a section summarizing what the election results mean for the future for those who're not familiar with SA's political system. For example, I'm not sure if this was correct, but I think I read somewhere that DA's hope was to prevent the ANC from getting over 66.6% of the vote, which
922:
Firstly, this was a well known campaign in the run up to the elections and particularly in the western cape. Whole communities of thousands participated. While the mainstream media tends to ignore campaigns that are not connected to specific political parties, it actually did cover this which means
747:
The infobox may make people think that the DA's 2004-2009 +17 came from the ANC's -15. This is unlikely, since race and liberation politics is still determining votes in South Africa, with policies and ethics almost entirely ignored. The DA probably expanded its white and "coloured" vote (taking from
1145:
I fail to see how voters were responsible for the floor crossing. Anyway, I don't think we need too many columns. For me, the main question at the time of an election is how many seats a party wins or loses over what they had just before the election. If the columns reflect that information, then
1081:
I still respectfully disagree. WP:UNDUE speaks only of 'viewpoints'. The section on
Election Boycott is not an attempt to represent a viewpoint. At least thats not the primary intent. The intent is to represent an 'action'. Something that people are actually doing. Even the sentence on Tutu is
942:
I am not questioning their campaign, a few political, (and non political), parties wanted to boycott the elections for various reasons. My question was more about the format of the section, (the 'main' article had nothing to do about election boycott). In fact the way it is now is more about a small
1353:
The current confusion of the change columns can be resolved by using longer headings, i.e. "Change since 2004 election", or "Change since before the election" instead of just "Change". But we're getting to a point where we have expect some intelligence from the reader when interpreting the table.
1229:
I see the CDP is listed in the 2009 results, but the CDP did not participate in the 2009 election under its own name. It formed an alliance party called the CDA. I added the CDA's results to the CDP row, but perhaps I should not have done that... what's the policy for parties that swallowed other
997:
The agenda's of 26 parties have to do with policies and political personalities. An election boycott has to do with the general election itself. That is why it is relevant. Also, your 77% turnout figure regards people who registered and did not vote. You should also take into account the number
906:
One way to contextualise it may be to have a section on voter turnout, and then have one sentence in that section devoted to the above-mentioned campaign. Such a section can also include information about how some voting stations garnered more than 100% voters (eg
Boesmansriviermond in the Eastern
1129:
I'm thinking tho that, eventho it's the voters' fault for voting for floor crossing losers, and unconscionably worse: voting for floor crossing accepters, should there now be a 2004 post election seats column, so one can compare changes in 2009vote-2004vote vs 2009vote-2007fc-2005fc-2004vote? --
1110:
In the table of seats, an indication is given of how many seats the party has lost or gained since the 2004 election. This would make sense for a country whose leadership is chosen by elections alone. But not South Africa -- we also have floor-crossing between elections. I think a more useful
1400:
Also, some words on trends would be nice - some explanation for why DA was strengthened in
Western Cape and nowhere else, while ANC was strengthened in Zulu lands and weakened everywhere else. This may seem obvious to residents of the country, but it should still be explained in the article.
707:
on this talk page first. All of the election articles list the winning party and the opposition party in the opening table - that is the only criterion when deciding what to include in the table. It has nothing to do with recent polls or whether the party was close to second place.
639:
I disagree. To deal with your concern, we could easily add a section on "new parties" or even "COPE". But, in keeping with the other post-1994 election articles, we should only include the first and second parties from the previous election in the opening table. The fact that
1011:
Regarding Zain's comments, I maintain that theory (regardless of whether it is scientific or social theory) can be considered a fringe theory. But we are not talking about theories here. We are talking about events. This event did happen. Theres nothing theoretical about
993:
My comments were concerned with the people who claimed it should be deleted altogether. Regarding those people, i think they are not being helpful. At FFMG, I attempted to address your concerns. The section is now not only about one campaign and I removed the 'see also'
846:
Also, the section is called "2009 Election
Boycott", so why is the main article redirecting to that one particular movement? It seems to me that the 2 are not really related. Yes, they might have boycotted the elections, but it is not the 'main' article about the
1111:
column would be one that shows how many seats the party has lost or won since the very day before the current election, and not since the 2004 election. Only that will be a true reflection of how much a party has lost or gained. What do you think? --
1326:
Leaving them out would make it look like there were less than 400 seats in the previous election per the seats change column. The floor crossers change column is needed because otherwise there are 2 missing seats when just comparing 2004/2009. --
1001:
Finally, the relevence of the boycott relates to specific communities boycotting. While figures are not out yet as such, I am sure after figures do come in, there will be communities where 80 or 90% of the people of voting age did not
153:
1338:
I think the new floor crossing column will resolve the confusion. The "Change" column needs to be consistent - either indicating the seats change since 2004, or since the 2007 floor crossing, or there could be two "change" columns.
578:
Agreed. We could mention the first and second parties from the previous election but COPE doesn't belong in that table. I'll wait a day or so and then make the change. Anyway, the table incorrectly lists
Dandala as the leader.
1289:
Parties which contested in 2004 and did not contest in 2009 are included in the table, but the "votes" column is empty. This makes perfect sense to me. How else would you suggest representing this information in the table?
462:
998:
of people of voting age who did not register. Most of the people who boycotted were likely to have decided to boycott before registration even took place. There are about 7 million people who did not even register.
688:
The COPE is the third largest party and was discussed aside from the traditional ANC vs. DA and is the third main opposition party. Plus recent polls could give COPE about 10% of the vote. It should be placed in the
1179:
If voters keep voting for parties that accept floor crossers, floor crossing continues (until the 74.25% party is afraid they won't be able to cope with a breakaway party) - people deserve the government they vote
562:
The DA is the official opposition and the ANC is the governing party, so perhaps just these two should be in the top table. The inexperience of COPE means that it's credibility is largely based on speculation.
768:
and in fact Lekota's picture will be appearing on ballots. I agree with the point above that from a consistency perspective either include all parties OR only the ruling party & the official oposition.
1183:
Instead of bold verticals (black null columns?), how about lite colors for the whole column? The most contrast on %2009, seats2009, and 2009-2007; and then another color for the 3 floor crossing columns? --
1267:
Why is the NNP listed? It doesn't even exist anymore... for the past four years already. It didn't have any seats and didn't gain any, yet there is a seat change percentage! How credible is this page then?
1493:
1149:
BTW, I see what has been done in the table now... I like it, although the column headers could be better :-) And is it not possible to use bold vertical lines to group related columns together? --
840:, have their own section? Are we supposed to list the political agendas of all the parties? Even those who are not taking part in the election? And even then, shouldn't it be a sub-section of
44:
602:
So you're saying that the criterion for inclusion in the table is your interpretation of vague expectations in public media? In that case, we should remove the entire table as a violation of
147:
1526:
1377:
Cannot be "election result" if it doesn't exist. Misleading and irrelevant. If the party existed previously, but doesn't exist now, unnecessary to say that it has no seats in parliament.
664:
946:
But, I also question the need for the section altogether, the article is about "South
African general elections", not about the various agendas of every political/non political groups.
1585:
1580:
765:
907:
Cape saw 135% voter turnout) (the reason probably being that people on holiday could vote anywhere -- I myself voted far, far away from home, so only my national vote counts). --
303:
285:
265:
663:
Everything about COPE is too speculative. The table should only have the ruling-party and the official opposition. COPE is neither. This recent article in the
Telegraph
927:
as an example is incorrect and disingenuous because that article is talking about "Fringe
Theories" in science. A vote boycott has nothing to do with a fringe theory.
425:
1595:
415:
1200:
How about just having four columns for seat allocation: 2004, 2005, 2007, 2009. No +- columns since it would not be clear what the change was relative to. See
79:
1600:
1590:
1575:
1018:
I fail to see how it is possible to shorten the second to last sentence without removing relevant list of some of the organisations that are boycotting.
391:
665:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/southafrica/4995544/South-Africa-opposition-warns-country-could-become-failed-state.html
1463:
a change to that summary table. I'm mentioning it here since this page is the main use of that template. Please post any comments there, not here. -
1549:
85:
168:
1486:
135:
1068:
1050:
976:
879:
788:
709:
645:
607:
593:
Yes it should. It is widely expected by essentially all publications that COPE is going to be among the top parties and should be included.--
580:
382:
343:
1378:
841:
828:
722:
Parties who formed government or became the official opposition (not only national) should only be put in the table:ANC, DA, COPE and IFP.
30:
1354:
The table is nice to have, but people should read wider than the table to get the full picture. Footnotes to the table can also help. --
1460:
501:
24:
1519:
1204:
129:
99:
497:
104:
20:
854:
857:
claimed they wouldn't), if we are going to have a section about
Election Boycott it would make a lot more sense to mention them.
125:
74:
1278:
627:
542:
Oops, nevermind. Seremane was the DA's candidate against Motlanthe. Switching the front page contestant photo back to Zille. --
496:
Why does the infobox say "575 (of the 601) seats" are up for election to a 400 seat legislature? Both the official page on it (
764:
Granted that Mvume Dandala is the Presidential Candidate of COPE but he is not the leader. The leader is Mosiuoa Lekota (see
481:
454:
240:
65:
175:
477:
1534:
1501:
1332:
1255:
1189:
1135:
753:
727:
694:
836:
973:
The above campaign was joined by a large number of spontaneous boycotts by various communities all over South Africa.
211:
109:
1072:
1054:
980:
883:
792:
713:
649:
611:
584:
141:
1552:
which supposedly affects this page and "all elections in South Africa since 1994, not just the 2024 elections."
469:
644:
commentators feel that COPE may beat the DA isn't good enough to warrant their inclusion in the opening table.
1382:
246:
228:
461:
and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, which has been
1530:
1497:
1328:
1304:
I think they should be just left out, personally. That's what's done in the table for the 2004 elections. -
1251:
1185:
1131:
749:
723:
690:
505:
775:
1436:
1425:
704:
480:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
473:
55:
1015:
After your comments, i do agree that the last sentence is not so important and might as well be removed.
631:
594:
390:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
70:
952:
Furthermore, with around 77% turnout, I fail to see where there was any kind of real Election Boycott.
1557:
818:
202:
1561:
1538:
1505:
1472:
1448:
1429:
1410:
1397:
would have allowed them to change the constitution. In that case, the DA seems to have succeeded.
1386:
1363:
1348:
1313:
1299:
1283:
1274:
1241:
1219:
1166:
1120:
1091:
1087:
1076:
1058:
1036:
1032:
984:
964:
936:
932:
916:
901:
887:
868:
822:
796:
779:
731:
717:
698:
676:
653:
634:
615:
597:
588:
572:
551:
547:
536:
532:
509:
374:
161:
924:
875:
1550:
Talk:2024_South_African_general_election#Infobox_legislative_election_instead_of_Infobox_election
897:
672:
568:
1064:
289:, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to
189:
1421:
811:
807:
51:
297:
195:
A news item involving 2009 South African general election was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
603:
1553:
1468:
1444:
1359:
1344:
1309:
1295:
1237:
1215:
1162:
1154:
1116:
912:
814:
1515:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
1482:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
1270:
1083:
1028:
960:
928:
864:
543:
528:
277:
259:
1569:
1406:
893:
668:
564:
446:
358:
337:
850:
520:
387:
1420:
Is it only me or are the final national votes Party names in another language?
834:
This section makes little or not sense. Why has the somewhat unknown movement,
1464:
1440:
1355:
1340:
1305:
1291:
1233:
1211:
1158:
1150:
1112:
908:
770:
364:
301:
and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit
956:
860:
196:
457:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to discussions about
1402:
291:
458:
949:
Otherwise we would need to include the agenda of the other 26 parties.
623:
500:) and the lead of the articel contain this #, so where 575 and 601?
1439:
seems to think this is the Romanian wikipedia. I've reverted it. -
1146:
no other columns detailling the inbetween movements are necessary.
1511:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
1478:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
1268:
1027:
I hope that my comments and edits are received in good faith.
524:
441:
222:
184:
15:
210:
943:
political group rather than any kind of boycott in general.
874:
I agree. Either contextualise it properly or remove it per
812:
http://www.news24.com/News24/Elections/Home/0,,,00.html#map
468:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
787:
I removed COPE from the table per the above discussion.
1247:
1126:
622:
Well, it is not just "my vague interpretations", check
1230:
parties and then had a slight name change (eg DP : -->
766:
Congress_of_the_People_(South_African_political_party)
160:
849:
A lot of people claimed not to want to participate, (
313:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Elections and Referendums
703:
Please do not edit the article without establishing
386:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
174:
1461:Template talk:South African general election, 2009
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1586:WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
1581:Start-Class Elections and Referendums articles
1525:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
1492:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
955:Is the section really related to the article?
316:Template:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
8:
859:I suggest we remove the section altogether.
667:suggests that COPE is not getting too far.
226:
332:
254:
400:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject South Africa
1049:I'm comfortable with that section now.
334:
256:
1205:Western Cape provincial election, 2009
558:Should COPE be in the table at the top
1548:There is a discussion in progress on
286:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
7:
1596:Mid-importance South Africa articles
1576:Knowledge (XXG) In the news articles
1232:CDA, etc)? How are they listed? --
1063:Regarding your other point, I think
380:This article is within the scope of
283:This article is within the scope of
519:The Democratic Alliance is picking
515:Switching pictures for DA candidate
245:It is of interest to the following
25:2009 South African general election
23:for discussing improvements to the
1487:Mangosuthu Buthelezi SONA 2014.jpg
319:Elections and Referendums articles
14:
1601:WikiProject South Africa articles
1591:Start-Class South Africa articles
523:as their presidential candidate:
498:National Assembly of South Africa
403:Template:WikiProject South Africa
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1157:) 10:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC) --
1106:2004 results versus 2008 results
445:
367:
357:
336:
276:
258:
227:
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
420:This article has been rated as
552:04:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
537:03:26, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
510:02:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
1520:UDM Leader Bantu Holomisa.jpg
482:contentious topics procedures
394:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1473:01:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
1067:covers what I meant better.
760:Is the Info on COPE Correct?
628:this article on polling data
573:00:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
1544:Discussions on another page
837:No Land! No House! No Vote!
1617:
1387:11:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
1364:08:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
1349:06:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
1314:22:02, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1300:21:13, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1284:20:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1242:19:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1220:15:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
1167:10:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
1121:19:13, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1092:08:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
1077:21:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
1059:19:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
1037:18:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
985:18:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
965:18:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
937:16:15, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
917:11:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
902:09:53, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
888:16:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
869:13:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
823:09:26, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
797:19:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
780:15:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
732:04:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
718:15:59, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
699:05:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
677:23:09, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
470:purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
426:project's importance scale
1562:06:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
1455:Summary table: a proposal
1449:11:40, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
1430:10:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
654:14:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
635:14:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
616:13:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
598:13:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
589:10:12, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
484:before editing this page.
419:
352:
310:Elections and Referendums
271:
266:Elections and Referendums
253:
207:section on 26 April 2009.
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1539:22:08, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
1506:17:08, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
1411:07:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
478:normal editorial process
383:WikiProject South Africa
1392:Needs "summary" section
465:as a contentious topic.
1210:to see what I mean. -
474:standards of behaviour
235:This article is rated
216:
75:avoid personal attacks
971:I say we get rid of "
829:2009 Election Boycott
406:South Africa articles
239:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
214:
100:Neutral point of view
1437:User:Nico.diaconescu
105:No original research
1459:I have proposed on
803:Results Available:
375:South Africa portal
1531:Community Tech bot
1498:Community Tech bot
1263:New National Party
724:Rizalninoynapoleon
691:Rizalninoynapoleon
455:contentious topics
241:content assessment
217:
86:dispute resolution
47:
489:
488:
440:
439:
436:
435:
432:
431:
331:
330:
327:
326:
221:
220:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1608:
1282:
1209:
1203:
783:
449:
442:
408:
407:
404:
401:
398:
377:
372:
371:
370:
361:
354:
353:
348:
340:
333:
321:
320:
317:
314:
311:
304:our project page
298:electoral reform
280:
273:
272:
262:
255:
238:
232:
231:
223:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1566:
1565:
1546:
1527:nomination page
1513:
1494:nomination page
1480:
1457:
1418:
1394:
1265:
1227:
1207:
1201:
1108:
832:
805:
773:
762:
560:
517:
494:
472:, any expected
405:
402:
399:
396:
395:
373:
368:
366:
346:
318:
315:
312:
309:
308:
236:
215:Knowledge (XXG)
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1614:
1612:
1604:
1603:
1598:
1593:
1588:
1583:
1578:
1568:
1567:
1545:
1542:
1523:
1522:
1512:
1509:
1490:
1489:
1479:
1476:
1456:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1417:
1414:
1393:
1390:
1379:41.241.161.201
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1264:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1226:
1225:CDA versus CDP
1223:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1181:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1147:
1140:
1139:
1107:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1013:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
999:
995:
988:
987:
968:
967:
953:
950:
947:
944:
920:
919:
904:
890:
858:
848:
845:
831:
826:
804:
801:
800:
799:
778:comment added
761:
758:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
620:
619:
618:
559:
556:
555:
554:
516:
513:
493:
490:
487:
486:
450:
438:
437:
434:
433:
430:
429:
422:Mid-importance
418:
412:
411:
409:
392:the discussion
379:
378:
362:
350:
349:
347:Midâimportance
341:
329:
328:
325:
324:
322:
281:
269:
268:
263:
251:
250:
244:
233:
219:
218:
208:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1613:
1602:
1599:
1597:
1594:
1592:
1589:
1587:
1584:
1582:
1579:
1577:
1574:
1573:
1571:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1543:
1541:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1521:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1510:
1508:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1488:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1477:
1475:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1415:
1413:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1398:
1391:
1389:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1337:
1336:
1334:
1330:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1262:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:DA, CDP : -->
1224:
1222:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1206:
1191:
1187:
1182:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1128:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1105:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1017:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1000:
996:
992:
991:
990:
989:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
969:
966:
962:
958:
954:
951:
948:
945:
941:
940:
939:
938:
934:
930:
926:
918:
914:
910:
905:
903:
899:
895:
891:
889:
885:
881:
877:
873:
872:
871:
870:
866:
862:
856:
852:
843:
839:
838:
830:
827:
825:
824:
820:
816:
813:
809:
802:
798:
794:
790:
786:
785:
784:
781:
777:
772:
767:
759:
757:
755:
751:
733:
729:
725:
721:
720:
719:
715:
711:
706:
702:
701:
700:
696:
692:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
674:
670:
666:
655:
651:
647:
643:
638:
637:
636:
633:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
600:
599:
596:
592:
591:
590:
586:
582:
577:
576:
575:
574:
570:
566:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
540:
539:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
514:
512:
511:
507:
503:
502:68.39.174.238
499:
491:
485:
483:
479:
475:
471:
466:
464:
460:
456:
451:
448:
444:
443:
427:
423:
417:
414:
413:
410:
393:
389:
385:
384:
376:
365:
363:
360:
356:
355:
351:
345:
342:
339:
335:
323:
306:
305:
300:
299:
294:
293:
288:
287:
282:
279:
275:
274:
270:
267:
264:
261:
257:
252:
248:
242:
234:
230:
225:
224:
213:
209:
206:
205:
204:
198:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1547:
1524:
1514:
1491:
1481:
1458:
1422:Bezuidenhout
1419:
1399:
1395:
1376:
1331:, 2009-04-26
1266:
1254:, 2009-04-26
1228:
1199:
1188:, 2009-04-26
1134:, 2009-04-26
1109:
1069:Zain Ebrahim
1051:Zain Ebrahim
977:Zain Ebrahim
972:
921:
880:Zain Ebrahim
851:Desmond Tutu
835:
833:
806:
789:Zain Ebrahim
763:
752:, 2009-04-26
746:
710:Zain Ebrahim
662:
646:Zain Ebrahim
641:
624:this article
608:Zain Ebrahim
581:Zain Ebrahim
561:
521:Joe Seremane
518:
495:
467:
452:
421:
397:South Africa
388:South Africa
381:
344:South Africa
302:
296:
290:
284:
247:WikiProjects
201:
200:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
774:âPreceding
237:Start-class
203:In the news
148:free images
31:not a forum
1570:Categories
1554:Wowzers122
892:Delete it
842:Opposition
463:designated
1084:Frombelow
1029:Frombelow
929:Frombelow
925:WP:FRINGE
876:WP:FRINGE
705:consensus
544:Toussaint
529:Toussaint
476:, or any
459:infoboxes
292:elections
197:Main Page
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1065:WP:UNDUE
994:section.
855:Merafong
847:boycott.
669:Teatreez
565:Teatreez
492:Comments
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1416:Results
1335:05:47z
1329:Jeandré
1271:Adriaan
1252:Jeandré
1186:Jeandré
1132:Jeandré
776:undated
756:08:56z
750:Jeandré
424:on the
199:in the
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1435:Yeah,
1258:06:50z
1248:Fixed.
1192:13:44z
1138:08:00z
689:table.
604:WP:NOR
243:scale.
126:Google
1465:htonl
1441:htonl
1356:leuce
1341:Zaian
1306:htonl
1292:Zaian
1234:leuce
1212:htonl
1159:leuce
1151:leuce
1127:Done.
1113:leuce
1002:vote.
909:leuce
894:Roger
771:Gidzz
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1558:talk
1535:talk
1502:talk
1469:talk
1445:talk
1426:talk
1407:talk
1383:talk
1360:talk
1345:talk
1310:talk
1296:talk
1238:talk
1216:talk
1163:talk
1155:talk
1117:talk
1088:talk
1073:talk
1055:talk
1033:talk
981:talk
961:talk
957:FFMG
933:talk
913:talk
898:talk
884:talk
865:talk
861:FFMG
819:talk
815:Axxn
808:Here
793:talk
728:talk
714:talk
695:talk
673:talk
650:talk
642:some
612:talk
585:talk
569:talk
548:talk
533:talk
525:link
506:talk
453:The
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1529:. â
1496:. â
1403:Esn
1250:--
1180:in.
1012:it.
626:or
416:Mid
176:TWL
1572::
1560:)
1537:)
1504:)
1471:)
1447:)
1428:)
1409:)
1385:)
1362:)
1347:)
1312:)
1298:)
1269:â
1240:)
1218:)
1208:}}
1202:{{
1165:)
1119:)
1090:)
1075:)
1057:)
1035:)
983:)
963:)
935:)
915:)
900:)
886:)
878:.
867:)
853:,
821:)
810::
795:)
730:)
716:)
697:)
675:)
652:)
632:TM
614:)
606:.
595:TM
587:)
571:)
550:)
535:)
508:)
295:,
156:)
54:;
1556:(
1533:(
1500:(
1467:(
1443:(
1424:(
1405:(
1381:(
1358:(
1343:(
1333:t
1308:(
1294:(
1281:)
1279:C
1277:â
1275:T
1273:(
1256:t
1236:(
1214:(
1190:t
1161:(
1153:(
1136:t
1115:(
1086:(
1071:(
1053:(
1031:(
979:(
959:(
931:(
911:(
896:(
882:(
863:(
844:?
817:(
791:(
782:.
754:t
726:(
712:(
693:(
671:(
648:(
610:(
583:(
567:(
546:(
531:(
504:(
428:.
307:.
249::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
-logo-v2.svg.png){kind=logo}
