Knowledge

Talk:2010 Stanley Cup Finals

Source 📝

966: 402: 298: 384: 277: 843:, there are a few issues: First, it is uncited; by opening up the context to all sports, there's a large universe of seven-game series that would have to be examined. Second, the nature of each sport is different; coming back from a deficit of three losses in the NHL is not a directly comparable feat with doing the same thing in MLB. I recognize, though, it is a piece of trivia that interests some. Opinions by others are welcome to help establish a consensus on this matter. 308: 788:(who is responsible for turning on the light) initially missed the call on the play – that is why there is such a thing as video review/instant replay in the first place. Furthermore, "that goal was not reviewed thoroughly" is more of an opinion; if they feel that the first angle they see gives them "incontrovertible visual evidence" to overturn the original call, then there is no point in seeing the other angles. 246: 412: 190: 738:
Why is it not mentioned in the article? The goal surely shouldn't have counted. First of all, the light did not turn on which clearly meant that the puck did not go in. Second, that goal was not reviewed thoroughly. They only showed one angle. I'm a Red Wings fan so don't accuse me of being a bitter
617:
Zzyzx11 decided to use the roster templates while the Finals are still going on, that's a good plan. I can re-format it after the series is complete. I just went with the 2009 format originally. Speaking of which, I'll update the 2009 template to be like the 2008 one.
480: 766:. So either nobody has yet bothered to research it, or they have done some searches but have not found sources that are credible and reliable to back up your claims that the goal "surely shouldn't have counted". Therefore, feel free 153: 1050:. Based on strength of arguments, there is at present a consensus not to have a separate section for quotes. Please join the discussion at the WikiProject Ice Hockey talk page to discuss the matter further. 489: 754:
No, I'm not going to accuse you of being a bitter Flyers fan, or even a bitter fan of the Blackhawks' main division rival. However, like anything else on Knowledge, all controversial claims must be
784:
And incidentally, one could easily refute your two arguments: First, the red light not turning on does not necessarily mean that "the puck clearly did not go in" if both the referee and the
1098: 1073: 147: 818:
at the beginning of the section, though I can't seem to find out where it exists in the code or why it is displaying. Hopefully another editor's eyes can spot the issue.
1047: 1043: 44: 79: 1083: 1022: 719:
Is there an article or section somewhere regarding the parade in Chicago today? My understanding is that the turnout was substantial (~2million). ---
356: 699:. The NHL does use away vs. home (which I would be fine with), but Knowledge has used home vs. away for simlar Stanley Cup articles in recent years. 632:
That's great, thank you. Eventually, all Finals rosters should look that way. I would, however, restrict it to just those players that saw ice time.
366: 927: 919: 1088: 858:
I would say the NHL 3-0 comebacks could probably stay, but I'm not sure of the relevance of mentioning other sports leagues comebacks there.
434: 85: 1093: 767: 888:
If there is no further discussion, then I will proceed with reversing the edit in question, to remove the comparison to other sports.
168: 1078: 135: 425: 389: 938:. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the 763: 654: 99: 30: 696: 680: 104: 20: 646:
Concur, minus the ice time qualifier. They're all on the roster, their names will be on the Cup, and they all get rings.
322: 282: 74: 528:
over this very issue, and the consensus reached was to include the "s". Therefore, renaming this 2010 article from "Final
129: 1010: 957: 931: 573: 521: 257: 1026: 223: 65: 125: 533: 332: 227: 935: 175: 551:
In a nutshell, the eventual consensus back then was to continue to use the most common name at the time (per
992: 987: 811: 755: 599: 525: 109: 24: 1044:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Archive66#Removal of quotes sections from Stanley Cup Final articles
1006: 947: 785: 744: 684: 263: 873:
I would definitely leave mention of NHL comebacks but we probably don't need ones from other sports. -
740: 978: 825: 704: 700: 676: 552: 141: 532:" or "Final" would also be considered a "controversial move", and thus requires a request posted on 245: 556: 231: 161: 55: 433:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1051: 982: 974: 904: 889: 844: 70: 965: 878: 793: 775: 673:
I changed the teams around so they read in the standard format of "Away team" at "Home team"
581: 564: 541: 417: 401: 383: 51: 1055: 996: 943: 908: 893: 848: 724: 637: 607: 198: 297: 276: 821: 623: 648: 313: 1067: 1059: 1016: 951: 912: 897: 882: 874: 852: 829: 797: 789: 779: 771: 759: 748: 728: 708: 688: 658: 641: 627: 611: 585: 577: 568: 560: 545: 537: 720: 633: 603: 1002: 619: 430: 407: 303: 520:" or "Final" in the page title, please review the discussion now archived at 939: 479: 189: 222:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 411: 328: 926:
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that
1048:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Archive64#Quotation sections
239: 184: 15: 598:
I would suggest using the template for the rosters from the
478: 934:
on June 9, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at
327:, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to 1039: 840: 576:
has ended with keeping the current title with the "S".
160: 555:) instead of the NHL's official preference (see also 516:
Before any move regarding whether it should be "Final
991:. This was the Blackhawks' first championship since 429:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 461: 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1099:C-Class Philadelphia Flyers task force articles 174: 8: 1074:Knowledge articles that use Canadian English 999:declared June 11 "Chicago Blackhawks Day". 812:2010_Stanley_Cup_Finals#Chicago_Blackhawks_2 458: 378: 271: 202:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 995:, and the following day the city's mayor 981:, showing the celebration following the 522:Talk:2008 Stanley Cup Finals#Page title 380: 273: 243: 1005:, featuring the Blackhawks' logo; the 928:File:Chicago Grant Park night pano.jpg 920:File:Chicago Grant Park night pano.jpg 230:, this should not be changed without 7: 423:This article is within the scope of 319:This article is within the scope of 695:This subject was also discussed at 262:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 14: 1046:, and the previous discussion at 1009:, displaying "Go Hawks"; and the 1084:High-importance Chicago articles 964: 443:Knowledge:WikiProject Ice Hockey 410: 400: 382: 306: 296: 275: 244: 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1042:: please see the discussion at 734:Game 6 winning goal controversy 446:Template:WikiProject Ice Hockey 361:This article has been rated as 697:Talk:2010 Stanley Cup playoffs 490:Philadelphia Flyers task force 1: 903:I have reverted the changes. 866:23:27, October 28, 2013 (UTC) 524:. Two years ago, there was a 487:This article is supported by 437:and see a list of open tasks. 341:Knowledge:WikiProject Chicago 42:Put new text under old text. 1089:WikiProject Chicago articles 1011:Blue Cross Blue Shield Tower 898:18:59, 8 November 2013 (UTC) 883:12:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC) 853:23:11, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 715:Blackhawks Parade in Chicago 344:Template:WikiProject Chicago 1094:C-Class Ice Hockey articles 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1115: 913:16:52, 1 August 2014 (UTC) 367:project's importance scale 1060:15:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC) 1027:More featured pictures... 1013:, displaying "Hawks win". 798:23:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 780:23:18, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 770:by adding some. Regards. 760:credible reliable sources 749:22:25, 20 June 2010 (UTC) 729:02:39, 12 June 2010 (UTC) 659:11:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC) 586:10:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC) 534:Knowledge:Requested moves 486: 457: 395: 360: 333:Chicago metropolitan area 291: 270: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1079:C-Class Chicago articles 973:A panoramic view of the 952:23:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC) 936:Template:POTD/2015-06-09 709:20:18, 2 June 2010 (UTC) 689:18:39, 2 June 2010 (UTC) 642:21:17, 27 May 2010 (UTC) 628:20:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC) 612:22:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC) 569:12:58, 22 May 2010 (UTC) 546:07:26, 16 May 2010 (UTC) 988:2010 Stanley Cup Finals 830:04:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC) 462:Associated task forces: 25:2010 Stanley Cup Finals 1007:Smurfit-Stone Building 483: 426:WikiProject Ice Hockey 252:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 1001:This image shows the 930:will be appearing as 764:neutral point of view 482: 100:Neutral point of view 814:, there is an extra 228:relevant style guide 224:varieties of English 105:No original research 768:to improve the page 449:Ice Hockey articles 323:WikiProject Chicago 226:. According to the 983:Chicago Blackhawks 975:skyline of Chicago 958:Picture of the day 932:picture of the day 484: 258:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1019: 985:' victory in the 922:to appear as POTD 867: 864: 828: 679:comment added by 509: 508: 505: 504: 501: 500: 497: 496: 418:Ice hockey portal 377: 376: 373: 372: 238: 237: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1106: 1014: 997:Richard M. Daley 968: 868: 865: 863: 862: 819: 817: 756:properly sourced 691: 469: 459: 451: 450: 447: 444: 441: 420: 415: 414: 404: 397: 396: 386: 379: 349: 348: 347:Chicago articles 345: 342: 339: 316: 311: 310: 309: 300: 293: 292: 287: 279: 272: 255: 249: 248: 240: 199:Canadian English 195:This article is 192: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1114: 1113: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1064: 1063: 1036: 1031: 1030: 1029: 971: 970: 969: 960: 924: 860: 859: 837: 815: 810:In the section 808: 762:, written in a 736: 717: 674: 671: 657: 596: 514: 467: 448: 445: 442: 439: 438: 416: 409: 363:High-importance 346: 343: 340: 337: 336: 312: 307: 305: 286:High‑importance 285: 256:on Knowledge's 253: 232:broad consensus 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1112: 1110: 1102: 1101: 1096: 1091: 1086: 1081: 1076: 1066: 1065: 1035: 1034:Quotes section 1032: 1021: 972: 963: 962: 961: 956: 955: 944:Chris Woodrich 923: 917: 916: 915: 886: 885: 870: 869: 836: 833: 807: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 735: 732: 716: 713: 712: 711: 670: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 653: 595: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 574:An RFC in 2016 513: 510: 507: 506: 503: 502: 499: 498: 495: 494: 485: 475: 474: 472: 470: 464: 463: 455: 454: 452: 435:the discussion 422: 421: 405: 393: 392: 387: 375: 374: 371: 370: 359: 353: 352: 350: 318: 317: 314:Chicago portal 301: 289: 288: 280: 268: 267: 261: 250: 236: 235: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1111: 1100: 1097: 1095: 1092: 1090: 1087: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1077: 1075: 1072: 1071: 1069: 1062: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1033: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1018: 1017:Daniel Schwen 1012: 1008: 1004: 998: 994: 990: 989: 984: 980: 976: 967: 959: 954: 953: 949: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 921: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 901: 900: 899: 895: 891: 884: 880: 876: 872: 871: 857: 856: 855: 854: 850: 846: 842: 834: 832: 831: 827: 823: 813: 806:extra player5 805: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 782: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 752: 751: 750: 746: 742: 733: 731: 730: 726: 722: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 693: 692: 690: 686: 682: 678: 668: 660: 656: 651: 650: 645: 644: 643: 639: 635: 631: 630: 629: 625: 621: 616: 615: 614: 613: 609: 605: 601: 593: 587: 583: 579: 575: 572: 571: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 553:WP:COMMONNAME 550: 549: 548: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 526:page move war 523: 519: 511: 492: 491: 481: 477: 476: 473: 471: 466: 465: 460: 456: 453: 436: 432: 428: 427: 419: 413: 408: 406: 403: 399: 398: 394: 391: 388: 385: 381: 368: 364: 358: 355: 354: 351: 334: 330: 326: 325: 324: 315: 304: 302: 299: 295: 294: 290: 284: 281: 278: 274: 269: 265: 259: 251: 247: 242: 241: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 200: 194: 191: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1037: 1015:Photograph: 1000: 986: 942:. Thanks! — 925: 887: 838: 809: 739:Flyers fan. 737: 718: 672: 647: 600:2008 article 597: 557:WP:TRADEMARK 529: 517: 515: 488: 424: 362: 321: 320: 264:WikiProjects 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 196: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 741:Spartan9199 675:—Preceding 197:written in 148:free images 31:not a forum 1068:Categories 1038:Regarding 1003:CNA Center 979:Grant Park 839:Regarding 822:MrDolomite 786:goal judge 701:Bcperson89 669:The series 536:. Cheers. 512:Page title 440:Ice Hockey 431:ice hockey 390:Ice Hockey 1040:this edit 940:Main Page 841:this edit 816:{{player5 649:Jauerback 212:travelled 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 835:Comeback 681:74.9.3.6 677:unsigned 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1023:Archive 875:DJSasso 790:Zzyzx11 772:Zzyzx11 594:Rosters 578:Zzyzx11 561:Zzyzx11 538:Zzyzx11 365:on the 338:Chicago 331:or the 329:Chicago 283:Chicago 254:C-class 220:analyze 216:realize 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1052:isaacl 905:isaacl 890:isaacl 861:Canuck 845:isaacl 721:kilbad 634:Jmj713 604:Jmj713 260:scale. 208:centre 204:colour 126:Google 977:from 758:with 655:dude. 620:One95 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1056:talk 993:1961 948:talk 909:talk 894:talk 879:talk 849:talk 826:Talk 794:talk 776:talk 745:talk 725:talk 705:talk 685:talk 638:talk 624:talk 608:talk 582:talk 565:talk 542:talk 357:High 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 559:). 176:TWL 1070:: 1058:) 1025:– 950:) 911:) 896:) 881:) 851:) 824:• 820:— 796:) 778:) 747:) 727:) 707:) 687:) 640:) 626:) 610:) 602:. 584:) 567:) 544:) 468:/ 218:, 214:, 210:, 206:, 156:) 54:; 1054:( 946:( 907:( 892:( 877:( 847:( 792:( 774:( 743:( 723:( 703:( 683:( 652:/ 636:( 622:( 606:( 580:( 563:( 540:( 530:s 518:s 493:. 369:. 335:. 266:: 234:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
2010 Stanley Cup Finals
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

Canadian English
varieties of English
relevant style guide
broad consensus

content assessment

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.