Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:2019 India–Pakistan border skirmishes

Source 📝

1417:
unpopulated areas and resulted in no casualties or infrastructural damage. Pervez Khattak, the Pakistani Defence Minister, stated that the Pakistani Air Force did not retaliate at that time because "they could not gauge the extent of the damage"." into this Pakistani officials acknowledged the intrusion of Indian aircraft into the country's airspace but rejected the statements about the results. They stated that the Indian jets were intercepted and that the payloads were dropped in unpopulated areas and resulted in no casualties or infrastructural damage, only a crow was touched in the airstrike and is dead. Pervez Khattak, the Pakistani Defence Minister, stated that the Pakistani Air Force did not retaliate at that time because "they could not gauge the extent of the damage", but later they retaliate.
666: 682: 1157: 1055: 1423: 1311:
important part. "India rejected pakistan claim of shooting of second aircraft that lacks any credible evidence". This sentence should be added because in this article its written that pakistan claimed shooting of seocnd jet. So Indian response should be added. Indian response is that "There is no credible evidence of pakistn shooting a second aircraft and is a false story". "India rejected pakistan claim of shooting of second aircraft that lacks any credible evidence" this should be added
650: 285: 731: 819: 710: 741: 535: 257: 1376: 1112: 1011: 227: 354: 333: 302: 364: 607: 596: 585: 574: 475: 440: 563: 1209:
I request the admin to add a missing point. pakistan claimed that they shot a second Indian aircraft. pakistan never provided any credible evidence for that claim. However India rejected the pakistani claim many times and cited lack of any evidence. Here its added that pakistan claimed the second jet
1182:
The Su 30 shooting of pakistan is denied by India and no further proof has been given by pakistan. So its an unconfirmed or false story from pakistan. India also claims a F16 got shot down and also attacked a religious center in pakistan with few causalities claimed. This cannot be ruled as a victory
1248:
Like this you mean "But a subsequent statement revised the count down to one–Abhinandan Varthaman, a Wing Commander. According to Indian media allegations, the other pilot the Pakistan Army claimed to have captured and taken to the Combined Military Hospital is claimed to be the downed F-16 pilot"?
1240:
Sir. Its not clearly stated anywhere in the main article that India rejected the second jet shooting. It should be clearly mentioned that India rejected the pakistani claim of shooting down of second jet that lacks any evidence. It just says India rejects this version of events. That's not clear.
1139:
This standoff between Pakistan and India was won by Pakistan because Pakisatn Armed Land Forces has successfully defend Pakistan. And Indian Loss 1 mig-21, 1 su-30MKI , 1 Mi-17 and Pakistan loss More than 10 civilians and only 2 Pakistani solider loss their life. I am sending this edit request to
915:
As an unconfirmed incident, I request you to please add the Indian rejection of the SU 30 claim from pakistan. The article only mention pakistani rejection of F16 claim by India. Indian rejection of Su 30 claim from pakistan should be also added as we don't have any credible evidence of any SU 30
1080:
There is no conformation of any SU 30 being shot down. pakistan has never produced a single evidence to support the SU 30 claims. So its deemed as false. An aircraft crash require large amount of proof. There should be crash site, crashed aircraft parts all over the place, testimonials including
1310:
Sir its an important part of this incident. pakistanis calimed that they shot two Indian aircrafts. One is mig 21. They also said they shot another aircraft but never gave any credible evidence of that. The second aircraft that pakistan claimed to have shot down is rejected by India. This is an
1335:
Hi, you have added the result section in the page. You should either remove this part as these are skirmishes, or you should write Pakistani victory. Because India claimed to have attacked targets in Pakistan killing number of people, which by impartial observers never happened. Then Pakistan
1416:
I want to change an information in the balakot strikes. This "Pakistani officials acknowledged the intrusion of Indian aircraft into the country's airspace but rejected the statements about the results. They stated that the Indian jets were intercepted and that the payloads were dropped in
1241:
India clearly said it many times that it rejects second jet shooting and flew the same jet which pakistan claimed that they shot down. This is a main part of this and should be added separately. India rejected pakistai second jet shooting and says its juts a coverup of their loss.
1210:
shooting but Indian rejection of the claim is not added. Its a very important part and should be added. India rejected the pak claims many times. This should be added here as the second jet claim is mentioned here so its rejection of that claim by India should also be mentioned.
916:
being shot down. India also said it flew the same Su 30 that's claimed to be shot down. India also debunks pakistani claim of shooting a SU 30 as it got no evidence. Thank you very much for your efforts on being neutral and accommodating. We all appreciate it very much.
190: 153: 673: 454: 1336:
retaliated and downed Indian aircraft and captured the pilot, and also warded off and defended attack from the Indian navy. Similarly, other events also prove the same. These were very successful and winning set of events for Pakistan.
657: 450: 689: 458: 44: 147: 1352: 1038:
On indian losses there was only Mig-21 show on wikipedia but pakistan air force shot down 2 indiant jet one Mig-21 ans one Su-30 MKI. Please change and add one SU-30 MKI loss on indian side.
1337: 975: 1550: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 1081:
verified videos and pictures from locals, radar signatures, pilot and more. Lack of any of these evidence point out that SU 30 is a fake claim made by pakistan without any evidence.
1545: 890: 842: 548: 525: 487: 1540: 964: 1520: 1535: 534: 218: 1270: 79: 797: 168: 976:
https://www.financialexpress.com/business/defence/indian-air-force-rubbishes-pakistans-claim-of-shooting-indias-sukhoi-30-jets-calls-it-a-cover-up/1506131/
135: 1560: 1530: 515: 1505: 24: 1570: 787: 482: 445: 422: 85: 1555: 1266: 1242: 953: 1575: 1515: 1140:
change the result of this border skirmishes between Pakistan and india. I want to result from Inconclusive to Pakistan Army Victory. Thank you
665: 412: 129: 1225:
We do "India rejected this version of events and stated to have "successfully foiled" Pakistan's attempt to "target military installations"".
763: 491: 1211: 1190: 1088: 30: 125: 1525: 1467: 965:
https://www.news18.com/news/india/sukhoi-fighter-jet-shot-down-by-pakistan-makes-appearance-at-indian-air-force-day-flypast-2337989.html
1565: 1356: 175: 99: 1341: 754: 715: 104: 20: 1167:
that support the change you want to be made. Furthermore, having a greater number of casualties does not necessarily mean a loss.
1269:. India clearly said its a false story without any evidence. India also flew the same Su 30 pakisatn claimed to have shot down. 681: 74: 1510: 861: 826: 313: 1271:
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/on-air-force-day-iaf-flies-sukhoi-30mki-fighter-jet-that-pakistan-claims-it-shot-down-2113472
387: 377: 338: 65: 883: 141: 1287: 931: 1434: 1164: 1062: 857: 898: 284: 226: 185: 1382: 1118: 1017: 109: 1490: 1475: 1460: 1446: 1411: 1360: 1345: 1324: 1291: 1258: 1234: 1219: 1198: 1176: 1149: 1096: 1074: 1047: 995: 935: 902: 849: 237: 1172: 1267:
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/false-claim-india-rubbishes-pakistans-claim-of-shooting-down-sukhoi-30-2003211
1243:
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/false-claim-india-rubbishes-pakistans-claim-of-shooting-down-sukhoi-30-2003211
1215: 1194: 1092: 954:
https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/air-force-day-india-flies-sukhoi-30mki-pak-claimed-have-shot-down-110169
319: 1471: 879:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
894: 486:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 1275: 1186: 1084: 919: 1486: 1456: 1320: 1303: 1254: 1230: 991: 860:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
853: 55: 762:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
70: 1451:
I just finally figured out the change you want to make, you want to add a line about a dead crow, no.
269: 301: 1403: 1168: 1141: 1039: 161: 1430: 1279: 923: 1442: 1407: 1145: 1043: 242: 241: 256: 1482: 1452: 1316: 1299: 1283: 1250: 1226: 987: 927: 262:
A news item involving 2019 India–Pakistan border skirmishes was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
51: 1070: 649: 239: 1429:
it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a
746: 1499: 1438: 875:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
1265:
Sir please add that "India rejected pakistani claim of the shooting of second jet".
818: 369: 1315:
and we say they then revised that, and that India claimed they shot down an f-16.
1205:
Please add the Indian rejection of second jet claimed to be shot down by pakistan
1066: 838: 730: 709: 736: 359: 263: 353: 332: 834: 759: 385:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 474: 439: 830: 382: 1370: 1106: 1005: 813: 295: 251: 243: 15: 1367:
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 February 2024
911:
Please add the rejection of Su 30 shooting by Indian sources
680: 664: 648: 533: 283: 1103:
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 August 2023
848:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
1002:
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 July 2023
986:
As we do not mention it, why do we need to add a denial?
829:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
1183:
of any side as there is no clear advantage to anyone.
276: 381:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of 160: 758:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 546:
This article has been checked against the following
631: 545: 174: 1551:South Asian military history task force articles 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 889:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 1546:C-Class South Asian military history articles 1065:that support the change you want to be made. 8: 500:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 1541:Asian military history task force articles 1351:Hey. Moderator would you respond to this? 1273: 1184: 1082: 917: 704: 628: 542: 434: 327: 1521:B-Class India articles of Mid-importance 1298:Why do we need to say more than we do? 480:This article is within the scope of the 1536:C-Class Asian military history articles 946: 706: 674:South Asian military history task force 436: 329: 299: 490:. To use this banner, please see the 1353:2001:14BB:AA:917B:C0B1:BF60:6B3B:ECF6 503:Template:WikiProject Military history 25:2019 India–Pakistan border skirmishes 7: 1506:Knowledge (XXG) In the news articles 1338:2001:14BB:CA:986F:7031:320C:CBD:E957 772:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pakistan 752:This article is within the scope of 375:This article is within the scope of 318:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 14: 1561:Post-Cold War task force articles 1531:C-Class military history articles 658:Asian military history task force 397:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 1571:Low-importance Pakistan articles 1421: 1374: 1155: 1110: 1053: 1009: 817: 739: 729: 708: 605: 594: 583: 572: 561: 473: 438: 362: 352: 331: 300: 255: 225: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 792:This article has been rated as 520:This article has been rated as 417:This article has been rated as 1556:C-Class Post-Cold War articles 1235:11:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC) 1220:11:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC) 1: 1576:WikiProject Pakistan articles 1516:Mid-importance India articles 1199:19:43, 7 September 2023 (UTC) 862:contentious topics procedures 775:Template:WikiProject Pakistan 766:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1461:14:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC) 1447:14:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC) 1412:14:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC) 1361:22:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC) 1325:16:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1292:15:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 1259:14:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC) 903:18:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC) 483:Military history WikiProject 1491:14:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1476:14:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 1397:to reactivate your request. 1385:has been answered. Set the 1346:00:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC) 1133:to reactivate your request. 1121:has been answered. Set the 1032:to reactivate your request. 1020:has been answered. Set the 1592: 1526:WikiProject India articles 1177:01:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC) 1150:22:33, 3 August 2023 (UTC) 850:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 798:project's importance scale 566:Referencing and citation: 423:project's importance scale 400:Template:WikiProject India 1566:B-Class Pakistan articles 1097:10:11, 21 July 2023 (UTC) 1075:23:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC) 1048:23:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC) 864:before editing this page. 791: 724: 688: 672: 656: 627: 519: 506:military history articles 468: 416: 347: 326: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 996:10:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC) 936:09:53, 29 May 2023 (UTC) 858:normal editorial process 690:Post-Cold War task force 884:IAF-mig-21-wreckage.jpg 845:as a contentious topic. 632:Associated task forces: 577:Coverage and accuracy: 1511:B-Class India articles 1431:"change X to Y" format 854:standards of behaviour 685: 669: 653: 610:Supporting materials: 538: 308:This article is rated 289: 75:avoid personal attacks 684: 668: 652: 537: 312:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 287: 219:Auto-archiving period 100:Neutral point of view 755:WikiProject Pakistan 105:No original research 599:Grammar and style: 552:for B-class status: 1466:pakistani victory 895:Community Tech bot 827:contentious topics 686: 670: 654: 539: 488:list of open tasks 314:content assessment 290: 86:dispute resolution 47: 1401: 1400: 1294: 1278:comment added by 1201: 1189:comment added by 1137: 1136: 1099: 1087:comment added by 1036: 1035: 938: 922:comment added by 869: 868: 841:, which has been 812: 811: 808: 807: 804: 803: 778:Pakistan articles 703: 702: 699: 698: 695: 694: 623: 622: 568:criterion not met 524:on the project's 492:full instructions 433: 432: 429: 428: 378:WikiProject India 294: 293: 250: 249: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1583: 1437:if appropriate. 1425: 1424: 1392: 1388: 1378: 1377: 1371: 1165:reliable sources 1159: 1158: 1128: 1124: 1114: 1113: 1107: 1063:reliable sources 1057: 1056: 1027: 1023: 1013: 1012: 1006: 978: 973: 967: 962: 956: 951: 821: 814: 780: 779: 776: 773: 770: 749: 744: 743: 742: 733: 726: 725: 720: 712: 705: 639: 629: 613: 609: 608: 602: 598: 597: 591: 587: 586: 580: 576: 575: 569: 565: 564: 543: 508: 507: 504: 501: 498: 497:Military history 477: 470: 469: 464: 461: 446:Military history 442: 435: 405: 404: 401: 398: 395: 372: 367: 366: 365: 356: 349: 348: 343: 335: 328: 311: 305: 304: 296: 279: 277:28 February 2019 259: 252: 244: 230: 229: 220: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1496: 1495: 1435:reliable source 1422: 1414: 1390: 1386: 1375: 1369: 1333: 1207: 1163:please provide 1156: 1126: 1122: 1111: 1105: 1061:please provide 1054: 1025: 1021: 1010: 1004: 983: 982: 981: 974: 970: 963: 959: 952: 948: 913: 891:nomination page 877: 852:, any expected 777: 774: 771: 768: 767: 747:Pakistan portal 745: 740: 738: 718: 637: 611: 606: 600: 595: 589: 584: 578: 573: 567: 562: 505: 502: 499: 496: 495: 462: 448: 402: 399: 396: 393: 392: 368: 363: 361: 341: 309: 288:Knowledge (XXG) 275: 246: 245: 240: 217: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1589: 1587: 1579: 1578: 1573: 1568: 1563: 1558: 1553: 1548: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1528: 1523: 1518: 1513: 1508: 1498: 1497: 1494: 1493: 1464: 1463: 1449: 1433:and provide a 1402: 1399: 1398: 1379: 1368: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1332: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1308: 1307: 1264: 1262: 1261: 1238: 1237: 1212:152.58.218.120 1206: 1203: 1191:152.58.201.181 1180: 1179: 1169:ARandomName123 1135: 1134: 1115: 1104: 1101: 1089:152.58.200.253 1078: 1077: 1034: 1033: 1014: 1003: 1000: 999: 998: 980: 979: 968: 957: 945: 944: 940: 912: 909: 907: 887: 886: 876: 873: 871: 867: 866: 822: 810: 809: 806: 805: 802: 801: 794:Low-importance 790: 784: 783: 781: 764:the discussion 751: 750: 734: 722: 721: 719:Low‑importance 713: 701: 700: 697: 696: 693: 692: 687: 677: 676: 671: 661: 660: 655: 645: 644: 642: 640: 634: 633: 625: 624: 621: 620: 618: 616: 615: 614: 603: 592: 581: 570: 556: 555: 553: 540: 530: 529: 518: 512: 511: 509: 478: 466: 465: 443: 431: 430: 427: 426: 419:Mid-importance 415: 409: 408: 406: 403:India articles 374: 373: 357: 345: 344: 342:Mid‑importance 336: 324: 323: 317: 306: 292: 291: 281: 260: 248: 247: 238: 236: 235: 232: 231: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1588: 1577: 1574: 1572: 1569: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1559: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1544: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1529: 1527: 1524: 1522: 1519: 1517: 1514: 1512: 1509: 1507: 1504: 1503: 1501: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1468:94.46.236.212 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1396: 1393:parameter to 1384: 1380: 1373: 1372: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1272: 1268: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1204: 1202: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1132: 1129:parameter to 1120: 1116: 1109: 1108: 1102: 1100: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1031: 1028:parameter to 1019: 1015: 1008: 1007: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 984: 977: 972: 969: 966: 961: 958: 955: 950: 947: 943: 939: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 910: 908: 905: 904: 900: 896: 892: 885: 882: 881: 880: 874: 872: 865: 863: 859: 855: 851: 846: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 823: 820: 816: 815: 799: 795: 789: 786: 785: 782: 765: 761: 757: 756: 748: 737: 735: 732: 728: 727: 723: 717: 714: 711: 707: 691: 683: 679: 678: 675: 667: 663: 662: 659: 651: 647: 646: 643: 641: 636: 635: 630: 626: 619: 617: 612:criterion met 604: 601:criterion met 593: 590:criterion met 582: 579:criterion met 571: 560: 559: 558: 557: 554: 551: 550: 544: 541: 536: 532: 531: 527: 526:quality scale 523: 517: 514: 513: 510: 493: 489: 485: 484: 479: 476: 472: 471: 467: 460: 459:Post-Cold War 456: 452: 447: 444: 441: 437: 424: 420: 414: 411: 410: 407: 390: 389: 384: 380: 379: 371: 360: 358: 355: 351: 350: 346: 340: 337: 334: 330: 325: 321: 315: 307: 303: 298: 297: 286: 282: 278: 273: 272: 271: 265: 261: 258: 254: 253: 234: 233: 228: 224: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1483:Slatersteven 1465: 1453:Slatersteven 1426: 1415: 1394: 1383:edit request 1334: 1317:Slatersteven 1309: 1300:Slatersteven 1274:— Preceding 1263: 1251:Slatersteven 1239: 1227:Slatersteven 1208: 1185:— Preceding 1181: 1160: 1138: 1130: 1119:edit request 1083:— Preceding 1079: 1058: 1037: 1029: 1018:edit request 988:Slatersteven 971: 960: 949: 941: 918:— Preceding 914: 906: 888: 878: 870: 847: 824: 793: 753: 547: 521: 481: 418: 388:project page 386: 376: 370:India portal 320:WikiProjects 268: 267: 222: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 839:Afghanistan 588:Structure: 274:section on 270:In the news 148:free images 31:not a forum 1500:Categories 1387:|answered= 1123:|answered= 1022:|answered= 942:References 843:designated 455:South Asia 1427:Not done: 1161:Not done: 1059:Not done: 856:, or any 264:Main Page 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1481:Source? 1439:M.Bitton 1404:OUIOUI18 1288:contribs 1276:unsigned 1187:unsigned 1142:OUIOUI18 1085:unsigned 1040:OUIOUI18 932:contribs 920:unsigned 835:Pakistan 769:Pakistan 760:Pakistan 716:Pakistan 549:criteria 223:7.5 days 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1280:Esmb11e 924:Esmb11e 796:on the 522:C-class 463:C‑class 421:on the 310:B-class 266:in the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1331:Result 1067:Xan747 837:, and 316:scale. 126:Google 1391:|ans= 1381:This 1127:|ans= 1117:This 1026:|ans= 1016:This 831:India 451:Asian 394:India 383:India 339:India 191:Index 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1487:talk 1472:talk 1457:talk 1443:talk 1408:talk 1357:talk 1342:talk 1321:talk 1304:talk 1284:talk 1255:talk 1231:talk 1216:talk 1195:talk 1173:talk 1146:talk 1093:talk 1071:talk 1044:talk 992:talk 928:talk 899:talk 825:The 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1389:or 1175:) 1125:or 1024:or 893:. — 788:Low 413:Mid 176:TWL 1502:: 1489:) 1474:) 1459:) 1445:) 1410:) 1395:no 1359:) 1344:) 1323:) 1290:) 1286:• 1257:) 1233:) 1218:) 1197:) 1148:) 1131:no 1095:) 1073:) 1046:) 1030:no 994:) 934:) 930:• 901:) 833:, 638:/ 457:/ 453:/ 449:: 221:: 213:, 209:, 205:, 201:, 197:, 193:, 156:) 54:; 1485:( 1470:( 1455:( 1441:( 1406:( 1355:( 1340:( 1319:( 1306:) 1302:( 1282:( 1253:( 1229:( 1214:( 1193:( 1171:( 1144:( 1091:( 1069:( 1042:( 990:( 926:( 897:( 800:. 528:. 516:C 494:. 425:. 391:. 322:: 280:. 215:6 211:5 207:4 203:3 199:2 195:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
2019 India–Pakistan border skirmishes
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
Index
1
2
3
4
5

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.