966:
948:
740:
719:
1177:
justice and nomination of a replacement by a
Republican president (and her speedy confirmation by a Republican senate) scarcely a month before an election said president was likely to lose (and did lose), but such sources are not reliable, and more likely than not are hard-right in their editorial slant. The vast majority of reliable sources almost certainly support our making this connection. The one change I might consider supporting would be changing
872:
691:
851:
750:
366:
615:
588:
508:
487:
518:
625:
308:
239:
1108:
said, and that her statement was in connection with the nomination to fill her seat. If there is a reliable source stating that there is no norm, precedent, or tradition for an outgoing
Justice to have such a request fulfilled, then certainly we can add that to the article (although, historically, there have been instances of Justices successfully recommending their successors).
456:
1020:
1176:
Just... no. Sources no doubt exist that explicitly say the death of Scalia, the nomination of
Merrick Garland, and the Republican unilateral shutdown of said nomination pending a possible election of a Republican president a year later are not relevant to the discussion of the death of a left-leaning
1066:
The reasoning to remove the Scalia section is because it's mostly not relevant to
Barrett's nomination, as Scalia's seat was filled by Gorsuch (and Obama had nominated Garland to the seat). Barrett was nominated to Ginsburg's seat, so it's a different seat entirely. The media had attempted to equate
1258:
This content provides historical context to the event, which is part of a series of events occurring in the longer thread of history. I am rather reflexively inclined to oppose the removal of well-sourced content that may be useful for a reader to understand the full context of an event. This would
1327:
In short, there's nothing particularly historically unique or even unusual about the timing of
Barrett's nominationâand, accordingly, unless there's any compelling reason to include it, I'll remove it. If anyone finds it particularly noteworthy, perhaps there's a place in the main article where it
1070:
The reasoning to remove the
Ginsburg wish section is because there is no norm, precedent, tradition, or anything whatsoever for an outgoing Justice to get what they wish regarding their seat. The Constitution clearly gives that power to the President and Senate. Including Ginsburg's wish may cause
1132:
The
Justices that got the successors they want, were smart enough to resign when the political conditions in the Presidency and Senate were favorable to actually get those successors. Ginsburg instead tried to serve as long as she could while still attempting to make demands about her successor.
1107:
Sources reporting something is precisely what defines it as noteworthy for inclusion in a
Knowledge article, though I don't know that an entire separate section is needed for the Scalia content. With respect to Ginsburg's wish, it is an historical fact that she was reported to have said what she
1238:
If there is a reason why the death of
Justice Scalia (whose replacement was Merrick Garland) should be detailed in an article about the confirmation of Justice Barrett, then that idea needs to be promulgated in some sort of NPOV context. Nothing like that appears on this page, and it's frankly
1289:
Thisâ"The 35 days between the nomination and the 2020 presidential election marked the shortest period of time between a nomination to the
Supreme Court and an election in U.S. history"âseems like an unimportant statistic and factoid that clutters up the lead.
214:
177:
316:
291:
68:
1484:
930:
920:
1034:
171:
896:
1479:
1469:
226:
222:
218:
1444:
780:
1404:
879:
856:
1243:
to have OBVIOUSLY IRRELEVANT, off-topic material appearing in an encyclopedic article. If there is a compelling argument for its inclusion here, then someone should make it.
435:
797:
700:
598:
1464:
1449:
1369:
1030:
833:
823:
230:
1494:
1409:
440:
1489:
1474:
1439:
787:
423:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
344:
192:
103:
48:
1313:
Lame-duck President Rutherford B. Hayes (who hadn't run for reelection) nominated William Burnham Woods the next day, and he was confirmed on the 21stâ
159:
1434:
681:
671:
1399:
792:
333:
1459:
415:
1454:
109:
153:
1419:
1346:
570:
560:
1147:
I would think that would be all the more reason to explain why it didn't work this time, but perhaps we should have an RfC on the topic.
1499:
763:
724:
647:
349:
149:
1429:
775:
1424:
1373:
1365:
1259:
be no different if the political parties involved were reversed. Reference to the Garland nomination has been in this article since
1345:
Just had to revert some obvious vandalism to the header and public opinion sections. Can someone with authority protect the page?
199:
982:
123:
54:
1194:
638:
593:
128:
44:
1071:
those who are unfamiliar with US government to believe that it was a legitimate factor in determining Ginsburg's successor.
771:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1414:
98:
1092:
is on editors that want to add or restore content, not on editors that want to remove content. 20:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
884:
467:
165:
973:
953:
892:
391:
89:
1139:
1098:
1080:
238:
209:
531:
492:
395:
249:
1350:
1293:
Many presidents have made lame-duck nominations, even after losing, which were subsequently confirmedâindeed,
17:
1385:
1354:
1335:
1278:
1252:
1229:
1199:
1162:
1123:
535:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
424:
133:
1311:
And in terms of speed, this was no record-breaker: on December 14, 1880, a vacancy opened up on the court.
1248:
1067:
those 2 nominations, but just bc the media reports something doesn't mean it's appropriate for Knowledge.
965:
947:
1134:
1093:
1075:
473:
326:
253:
755:
434:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
455:
399:
307:
185:
79:
1332:
981:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
895:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
646:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1260:
1191:
438:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
254:
94:
739:
718:
1244:
1026:
75:
1381:
1273:
1224:
1157:
1118:
1089:
374:
251:
690:
365:
1211:
871:
850:
630:
431:
1207:
624:
614:
587:
1393:
1186:
768:
1235:
I see nothing in this discussion that rises above the level of partisan acrimony.
507:
486:
1206:
Since the reinsertion of this material has again been reverted on the grounds of
1377:
1264:
1215:
1148:
1109:
517:
888:
745:
620:
523:
513:
320:
767:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
390:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
643:
978:
1214:, who is particularly well-versed in this policy, to weigh in.
1014:
536:
449:
430:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
407:
360:
255:
39:
26:
1376:
so it would same to make sense for this to follow its lead.
689:
1324:
nomination, which was confirmed on his last day in office.
1185:(and an explanation of what a Biden rule is) or some such.
883:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1485:
Low-importance United States courts and judges articles
1062:
1060:
1038:
1059:
I propose to make the edits that were attempted here:
184:
905:
Knowledge:WikiProject United States courts and judges
977:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
908:
Template:WikiProject United States courts and judges
642:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1285:
Why include number of days before election in lead?
1480:B-Class United States courts and judges articles
1470:B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
57:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1370:Ketanji Brown Jackson Supreme Court nomination
1031:Death and state funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
1445:Unknown-importance American politics articles
198:
18:Talk:2020 United States Supreme Court vacancy
8:
1405:Knowledge articles that use American English
348:â September 26, 2020 â was the nearest to a
345:Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination
880:WikiProject United States courts and judges
1183:2016 Republican citation of the Biden rule
942:
845:
713:
582:
481:
378:, which has its own spelling conventions (
267:
263:
49:Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination
911:United States courts and judges articles
944:
847:
715:
584:
483:
453:
1182:
1178:
1465:Low-importance United States articles
1450:American politics task force articles
398:, this should not be changed without
7:
1033:on 29 September 2020. The result of
971:This article is within the scope of
877:This article is within the scope of
761:This article is within the scope of
636:This article is within the scope of
529:This article is within the scope of
1495:All WikiProject Women-related pages
1410:Biography articles of living people
808:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
539:and the subjects encompassed by it.
47:for discussing improvements to the
1490:B-Class WikiProject Women articles
1475:WikiProject United States articles
1440:B-Class American politics articles
811:Template:WikiProject United States
342:Did you know ... that the date of
25:
1435:Low-importance politics articles
1374:Category:2022 in women's history
1366:Category:2020 in women's history
1018:
964:
946:
870:
849:
748:
738:
717:
623:
613:
586:
516:
506:
485:
454:
413:This article must adhere to the
364:
306:
237:
69:Click here to start a new topic.
1400:Knowledge Did you know articles
1025:This article was nominated for
925:This article has been rated as
902:United States courts and judges
857:United States courts and judges
828:This article has been rated as
676:This article has been rated as
565:This article has been rated as
1460:B-Class United States articles
656:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
472:It is of interest to multiple
1:
1455:WikiProject Politics articles
1364:I have added this article to
985:and see a list of open tasks.
899:and see a list of open tasks.
698:This article is supported by
659:Template:WikiProject Politics
650:and see a list of open tasks.
416:biographies of living persons
66:Put new text under old text.
1386:23:39, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
1336:20:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
1279:18:34, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
1253:12:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
1088:Also, keep in mind that the
893:United States federal judges
885:United States federal courts
701:American politics task force
1420:Low-importance law articles
1230:03:03, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
991:Knowledge:WikiProject Women
428:must be removed immediately
340:The text of the entry was:
74:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1516:
1500:WikiProject Women articles
1133:18:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
1074:14:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
997:WikiProject Women articles
994:Template:WikiProject Women
931:project's importance scale
834:project's importance scale
682:project's importance scale
571:project's importance scale
1430:B-Class politics articles
1355:12:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
1210:, I would like to invite
1200:03:30, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
1163:20:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
1124:17:49, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
959:
924:
865:
827:
764:WikiProject United States
733:
697:
675:
608:
564:
545:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
501:
480:
270:
266:
104:Be welcoming to newcomers
33:Skip to table of contents
1425:WikiProject Law articles
1318:. Hayes went on to make
769:United States of America
548:Template:WikiProject Law
319:appeared on Knowledge's
32:
1179:Death of Antonin Scalia
814:United States articles
694:
462:This article is rated
317:fact from this article
99:avoid personal attacks
693:
350:presidential election
292:Articles for deletion
231:Auto-archiving period
124:Neutral point of view
1415:B-Class law articles
1341:Vandalism protection
1305:eight were confirmed
756:United States portal
639:WikiProject Politics
396:relevant style guide
392:varieties of English
129:No original research
1328:could be included.
782:Articles Requested!
394:. According to the
1261:User:Arglebargle79
695:
468:content assessment
287:September 20, 2020
271:Article milestones
110:dispute resolution
71:
1197:
1142:
1101:
1083:
1049:
1048:
1013:
1012:
1009:
1008:
1005:
1004:
974:WikiProject Women
941:
940:
937:
936:
844:
843:
840:
839:
712:
711:
708:
707:
662:politics articles
581:
580:
577:
576:
448:
447:
406:
405:
359:
358:
301:
300:
262:
261:
90:Assume good faith
67:
38:
37:
16:(Redirected from
1507:
1297:nine nominations
1271:
1222:
1190:
1155:
1141:The owner of all
1140:
1116:
1100:The owner of all
1099:
1082:The owner of all
1081:
1022:
1021:
1015:
999:
998:
995:
992:
989:
968:
961:
960:
950:
943:
913:
912:
909:
906:
903:
874:
867:
866:
861:
853:
846:
816:
815:
812:
809:
806:
758:
753:
752:
751:
742:
735:
734:
729:
721:
714:
664:
663:
660:
657:
654:
633:
628:
627:
617:
610:
609:
604:
601:
590:
583:
553:
552:
549:
546:
543:
526:
521:
520:
510:
503:
502:
497:
489:
482:
465:
459:
458:
450:
436:this noticeboard
408:
375:American English
371:This article is
368:
361:
352:in U.S. history?
334:November 6, 2020
310:
268:
264:
256:
242:
241:
232:
203:
202:
188:
119:Article policies
40:
27:
21:
1515:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1390:
1389:
1362:
1343:
1287:
1265:
1255:
1236:
1216:
1212:User:Neutrality
1149:
1110:
1057:
1019:
996:
993:
990:
987:
986:
910:
907:
904:
901:
900:
859:
813:
810:
807:
804:
803:
802:
788:Become a Member
754:
749:
747:
727:
661:
658:
655:
652:
651:
631:Politics portal
629:
622:
602:
596:
550:
547:
544:
541:
540:
532:WikiProject Law
522:
515:
495:
466:on Knowledge's
463:
400:broad consensus
355:
354:
338:
258:
257:
252:
229:
145:
140:
139:
138:
115:
85:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1513:
1511:
1503:
1502:
1497:
1492:
1487:
1482:
1477:
1472:
1467:
1462:
1457:
1452:
1447:
1442:
1437:
1432:
1427:
1422:
1417:
1412:
1407:
1402:
1392:
1391:
1361:
1358:
1347:96.241.206.101
1342:
1339:
1303:Election Day,
1286:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1203:
1202:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1127:
1126:
1056:
1055:Proposed edits
1053:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1039:permanent link
1035:the discussion
1023:
1011:
1010:
1007:
1006:
1003:
1002:
1000:
983:the discussion
969:
957:
956:
951:
939:
938:
935:
934:
927:Low-importance
923:
917:
916:
914:
897:the discussion
875:
863:
862:
860:Lowâimportance
854:
842:
841:
838:
837:
830:Low-importance
826:
820:
819:
817:
801:
800:
795:
790:
785:
778:
776:Template Usage
772:
760:
759:
743:
731:
730:
728:Lowâimportance
722:
710:
709:
706:
705:
696:
686:
685:
678:Low-importance
674:
668:
667:
665:
648:the discussion
635:
634:
618:
606:
605:
603:Lowâimportance
591:
579:
578:
575:
574:
567:Low-importance
563:
557:
556:
554:
528:
527:
511:
499:
498:
496:Lowâimportance
490:
478:
477:
471:
460:
446:
445:
441:this help page
425:poorly sourced
411:
404:
403:
369:
357:
356:
339:
314:
313:
311:
303:
302:
299:
298:
295:
288:
284:
283:
280:
277:
273:
272:
260:
259:
250:
248:
247:
244:
243:
205:
204:
142:
141:
137:
136:
131:
126:
117:
116:
114:
113:
106:
101:
92:
86:
84:
83:
72:
63:
62:
59:
58:
52:
36:
35:
30:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1512:
1501:
1498:
1496:
1493:
1491:
1488:
1486:
1483:
1481:
1478:
1476:
1473:
1471:
1468:
1466:
1463:
1461:
1458:
1456:
1453:
1451:
1448:
1446:
1443:
1441:
1438:
1436:
1433:
1431:
1428:
1426:
1423:
1421:
1418:
1416:
1413:
1411:
1408:
1406:
1403:
1401:
1398:
1397:
1395:
1388:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1359:
1357:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1340:
1338:
1337:
1334:
1329:
1325:
1323:
1322:
1317:
1316:
1309:
1307:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1291:
1284:
1280:
1277:
1276:
1272:
1270:
1269:
1262:
1257:
1256:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1231:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1221:
1220:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1196:
1193:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1175:
1172:
1171:
1164:
1161:
1160:
1156:
1154:
1153:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1138:
1137:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1115:
1114:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1097:
1096:
1091:
1086:
1085:
1079:
1078:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1063:
1061:
1054:
1052:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1017:
1016:
1001:
984:
980:
976:
975:
970:
967:
963:
962:
958:
955:
952:
949:
945:
932:
928:
922:
919:
918:
915:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
881:
876:
873:
869:
868:
864:
858:
855:
852:
848:
835:
831:
825:
822:
821:
818:
805:United States
799:
796:
794:
791:
789:
786:
784:
783:
779:
777:
774:
773:
770:
766:
765:
757:
746:
744:
741:
737:
736:
732:
726:
725:United States
723:
720:
716:
703:
702:
692:
688:
687:
683:
679:
673:
670:
669:
666:
649:
645:
641:
640:
632:
626:
621:
619:
616:
612:
611:
607:
600:
595:
592:
589:
585:
572:
568:
562:
559:
558:
555:
538:
534:
533:
525:
519:
514:
512:
509:
505:
504:
500:
494:
491:
488:
484:
479:
475:
469:
461:
457:
452:
451:
443:
442:
437:
433:
429:
426:
422:
418:
417:
412:
410:
409:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:
370:
367:
363:
362:
353:
351:
347:
346:
336:
335:
330:
328:
327:Did you know?
322:
318:
312:
309:
305:
304:
296:
294:
293:
289:
286:
285:
281:
278:
275:
274:
269:
265:
246:
245:
240:
236:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
211:
207:
206:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
144:
143:
135:
134:Verifiability
132:
130:
127:
125:
122:
121:
120:
111:
107:
105:
102:
100:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
81:
77:
76:Learn to edit
73:
70:
65:
64:
61:
60:
56:
50:
46:
42:
41:
34:
31:
29:
28:
19:
1363:
1344:
1333:ElleTheBelle
1330:
1326:
1320:
1319:
1315:6 days later
1314:
1312:
1310:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1294:
1292:
1288:
1274:
1267:
1266:
1263:created it.
1245:KevinOKeeffe
1240:
1225:
1218:
1217:
1173:
1158:
1151:
1150:
1135:
1119:
1112:
1111:
1094:
1087:
1076:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1058:
1050:
1043:no consensus
1042:
972:
926:
878:
829:
793:Project Talk
781:
762:
699:
677:
637:
566:
551:law articles
530:
474:WikiProjects
439:
427:
420:
414:
387:
383:
379:
372:
343:
341:
332:
324:
290:
234:
208:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
118:
43:This is the
889:courthouses
537:legal field
373:written in
172:free images
55:not a forum
1394:Categories
1360:Categories
524:Law portal
331:column on
1187:Hijiri 88
1090:WP:BURDEN
432:libellous
321:Main Page
112:if needed
95:Be polite
45:talk page
1331:Thanks!
653:Politics
644:politics
599:American
594:Politics
388:traveled
235:180Â days
210:Archives
80:get help
53:This is
51:article.
1321:another
1208:WP:ONUS
1027:merging
929:on the
832:on the
680:on the
569:on the
464:B-class
384:defense
323:in the
279:Process
178:WPÂ refs
166:scholar
1378:Dunarc
1372:is in
1268:BD2412
1219:BD2412
1152:BD2412
1113:BD2412
1041:) was
891:, and
798:Alerts
470:scale.
282:Result
150:Google
1301:after
1299:made
1241:weird
1029:with
988:Women
979:women
954:Women
380:color
215:Index
193:JSTOR
154:books
108:Seek
1382:talk
1351:talk
1249:talk
297:Kept
276:Date
186:FENS
160:news
97:and
1368:as
1295:of
1181:to
1174:No.
1136:TOA
1095:TOA
1077:TOA
921:Low
824:Low
672:Low
561:Low
542:Law
493:Law
421:BLP
200:TWL
1396::
1384:)
1353:)
1308:.
1251:)
1198:)
1195:ăă
1143:âď¸
1102:âď¸
1084:âď¸
887:,
597::
386:,
382:,
315:A
233::
225:,
221:,
217:,
180:)
78:;
1380:(
1349:(
1275:T
1247:(
1226:T
1192:č
1189:(
1159:T
1120:T
1045:.
1037:(
933:.
836:.
704:.
684:.
573:.
476:.
444:.
419:(
402:.
337:.
329:"
325:"
227:2
223:1
219:A
212::
196:¡
190:¡
182:¡
175:¡
169:¡
163:¡
157:¡
152:(
82:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.