2496:, because said issue is discussed prominently by international publications as well as Pakistan sources like Dawn. That deserves a more fitting place. I propose that if this is to move it should go under "Reactions" at the beginning. Punjab police taking over the case seems appropriate, but trivial details about rudimentary police investigation such as examining of call records between 6:30 and 7:47 pm should be condensed and mentioned with brevity, as those read like a newspaper. The "October arrests" are blown out of proportion and be condensed too to a paragraph and subsumed in the same section on investigation. No point in writing "charged them with assaulting a female TikToker, Ayesha Akram on August 14", which again reads like news and because victim has been introduced, especially when a "in connection with the case" serves the purpose better. The RfC did not conclude accused as public figures, so if October arrests are to be included they should simply mention the no. of arrests made in connection with the case on the basis of victim's statement, accompanied by a one line denial by accused, as court proceedings over grant of bail to accused are UNDUE, the article is not indiscriminate collection of information.
2403:
While I do believe that @VR could and should discuss the changes they seek prior to making them, there is no policy against them adding the desired information or against removing their desired changes. Likewise there is policy for both including the desired changes and reverting the changes so I think that's moot. Now that the changes have been reverted the discussion should continue on the talk page. The same could be said for the edits reverted by @VR. Personally, I think information detailing the investigation and arrests stemming from it are valid for the article body, not the lead. I disagree with name usage in this case but, as pointed out by @VR, that isn't really the issue here. --
2932:. This talk page is for improving this article. The back on forth reversions are disruptive. Neither one of you are willfully vandalizing but you are violating editing practices called out in Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines. I'm just imploring you to stop before potential sanctions are handed out. I didn't take issue with your reverting misrepresentation. I would, however, ask that you do a little more research next time. It took all of a few minutes to determine that the paragraph you reverted was changed from its original wording which was more in line with the facts surrounding Salman's statements. --
1974:
guidelines. You may not agree and you are perfectly within your own rights to do so. Either way, you must gain consensus. I am just one voice. Contrary to what you believe, we do not simply follow the sources here at
Knowledge (XXG). There is a lot of information found in sources that never makes it in Knowledge (XXG). It becomes what is due and in this particular case, what is due in this article's lead. What happens on another article is irrelevant with general consensus being policy and guidelines and anything not specific in those guidelines being left to local consensus on individual articles. --
2856:(ec) It takes seconds to revert something in an article but if you really desire to improve the encyclopedia it is important to dig through the history of that article. I'm sure Theki had every intention of improving and from what I see they did make some improvements but this was an error and didn't properly explain in edit summary either. When I am able I will go back and put the original wording in the article that was agreed on by consensus. The we can decide if that wording should remain or we should make some modifications. It's unfair to judge wat was written by these refactoring edits. --
1268:
1048:
1027:
1218:
1200:
1058:
838:
817:
462:
441:
536:
1150:
943:
1445:
1391:
1373:
922:
1132:
953:
2808:. That rewrite changed the original meaning of the paragraph from what I am reading. It was never intended to say what it does now. Perhaps Theki can explain why they called it copy editing or rewording when it clearly refactored the paragraph and changed its meaning with the removal of important details. Regardless, this is no reason to edit war and Sheriff you are at 3RR as of your last revert. --
357:
336:
220:
367:
848:
1920:
among others associated with it. Only 13 have been arrested at this point. The only reason Sohail is named is due to his close affiliation with the victim. By naming him only you are placing more weight on him as an alleged perpetrator than the others supposedly involved. I disagree with this position being presented in
Wikivoice and certainly not in the lead. --
1299:
272:
3187:
up on the signs of editors that may be doing so in bad faith. Furthermore don't question them openly unless you have evidence they are, in fact, acting with ill intent and never question their ethnicity. Don't only seek the aid of those whom you feel would side with you in a dispute. Get someone you know would remain neutral and tell you if you are wrong.
251:
1596:"Seems" is not a confirmed consensus. If an editor/admin that is uninvolved in this RfC or the following discussions about the RfC wishes to close said RfC and finds that, in fact, they are considered public figures just for having a tiktok account and posting videos then what you said above applies. --
2069:
Amir aka Rambo's arrest is important and different from other 8 or 13 others arrested along with him because; Ayesha Akram in her first statement called him her saviour who rescued him from the incident. Later on he was directly charged by her in supplementary statement as the main culprit behind the
1882:
Actually, I was proposing that for the lead. For the body, I'd include more details including details of the legal aspects of the charges against Sohail, previous statements made by Akram regarding Sohail. Why would you not want to include that in the lead? The police arrested the alleged perpetrator
3182:
Do you not see how some might question that you are, in fact, pushing an agenda? Your first action was to try a delete the entire article with the reason being "WP:NOTNEWS", subsequent edits questioned the ethnicity of the creator and sought the aid of another editor that had engaged in edit warring
3065:
on the user talk page of an editor that had engaged in an edit war against the creator of this article. This seems highly inappropriate and questionable behavior. Being as this is a new editor to
Knowledge (XXG) I am seeking to show them the way we resolve content disputes by opening a discussion on
3003:
I'll help out to the best of my ability. I might be busy with academic stuff for most of the day but when I have time I'll attempt to expedite things.I will admit that I didn't completely look into the sources that correlated with the information being presented as I was switching things around (not
2963:
If I changed the meaning of the paragraph that was not my intent. I intended to improve upon the grammar which was lacking; no deliberate attempts were made to change any of the information. I'm still new to this, I apologize for the mess. I can try to roll back my changes but I'm not sure how to do
3186:
My suggestion would be to make an edit request on this talk page of what you want to see added to the article and provided the source if you do not not intend to add such yourself. Don't go around questioning the motives of other editors until you have sufficiently gained experience editing to pick
3106:
As for asking if the creator was Indian was because i noticed in their contributions to
Knowledge (XXG) that they only make articles about crimes in Pakistan but none in other southeast Asian countries. They claim they are a student of south east asian studies. So an element of suspicion arose that
2402:
I apologize, I have been away for a week traveling. I am very tired but will respond here before logging off for the rest of the day since my comment was used as something to support one side of this discussion. My comment does not exactly support the premise for which it is being represented here.
1919:
I have considered and I disagree to it in this case. There are 13 total arrested. Unless you find where all 13 are named then I suspect naming Sohail is undue. We don't know that he perpetrated this crime and he certainly didn't solely commit the crime as a FIR was filed on over 400 for this crime,
3055:
twice with edit summaries of "Added detail" and "Added a detail and yes it's from the same citation that gave the statistic". Upon review of the source that immediately follows the statement, there is no discussion of dismissal of cases, revocation of cases, or discarding cases as false, much less
2238:
that seemed to have been prominently mentioned in the article yet even its author wasn't known. If we are going to prominently mention a quote, we should know its author and either they should be some prominent person, or this quote should have been repeated in RS to warrant this kind of prominent
2083:
I recommend proposing it in a new section and allow everyone to give their thoughts. Of course, you are allowed to boldly edit and we can go from there but I strongly disagree with this "shoot first and ask questions after the fact approach" to editing. There is no rush to get this done. Knowledge
1999:
And my position is that you're interpreting BLP guidelines quite incorrectly. Let me add some material both to the article and the lead, so you may know exactly what it is I'm proposing to add. I'm not proposing to add anything in wikivoice (as you'll see shortly). Of course, you may revert it, as
2574:
You are the one that parsed the edit in their most trifling components, kindly do not then accuse me of following your own template you insisted on to ask for explanations. I did not raise a SIZE objection, but my argument revolved around UNDUE and BLPCRIME, do not set up a strawman and stick to
1952:
what position am I presenting in wikivoice? In the above statement I did not say that he committed the crime, only that he was arrested. And there is now no doubt that he was arrested. I have provided several reliable sources. There is further no policy that bars us from mentioning the arrest of
3160:
Thank you for your response. My intention wasn't to push agendas. Questioning ethnicity was naive of me,I agree, and I am sorry for that. I only wanted to promote a neutral perspective. I feel There are some issues with the article. First I feel it is not updated to present day. Furthermore new
1833:
In
October, 2021, police arrested the victim's associate Amir Sohail (who also called himself "Rambo") among others and charged him with molestation. The arrest came after the victim accused her associate of masterminding the mass sexual assault and blackmailing her over "objectionable" videos.
2452:
There are problems such as 1) your "investigation" section only covers those point of views that have been covered by
Pakistani sources but not international sources, 2) What "associate's lawyer denied" should not be covered because they were paid for it. Let me know what you have to say about
1973:
The lead is a summary of the article high points. It should not present anything not found in the article. Propose to add content to the article first and then propose what you wish to add to the lead. I gave my position based on my interpretation of
General Knowledge (XXG) guidelines and BLP
3212:
i did not mean to push an agenda. Why are you insisting I am? Furthermore promoting neutrality is your concern. That's a rule of wikipedia. Erasing edits that dont fit your perspective is not neutral. These statements were quoted from the articles that were included this page. Not including
2149:
You certainly did not clean up after your test edits as you now claim, necessitating the purge. If you wish to make test edits, do so in the space provided in sandbox, not in article namespace. And do not also repeatedly re-add disputed content even in the face of clear disagreement.
2977:
Oh no, I'm sorry if what I said seemed to imply your intent was anything but good faith. On the contrary, I don't think you were trying to mislead so I don't view it as a mess or that you should need to apologize. We can work together to make sure the article says what it should.
1573:
For individuals who are not public figures; that is, individuals not covered by § Public figures, editors must seriously consider not including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed, or is accused of having committed, a crime, unless a conviction has been
1659:
Also please clarify if you opposed to merely mentioning Rambo's name, or anything about him at all? Would you be opposed to the article and the lead describing his arrest, his relation to the victim, the fact that the victim herself accused him without mentioning his name?
3102:
Also the article was quoted as saying said that many critics recalled Imran khans statement. However when I looked at the news article it was only the writer of the article recalling the past starement. There was no mention of many critics recalling the statement in the
2837:
Thank you for taking notice. I didn't revert them again due to that rule and was waiting to find some volunteer time to go through this. Thank you for spending time to actually read the coverage and share what actually happened. I hope we can revert Theki's wrong edits.
3045:"If a woman is wearing very few clothes it will have an impact on the men unless they are robots,” said Mr Khan in an interview in June. “If you raise temptation in society to a point – and all these young guys have nowhere to go – it has a consequence in the society."
3165:. There was only a single line and just that. Being editors its our duty to promote neutrality and mention all prespectives.Therefore I believe another section should be included that mentions the facts that have caused this incident to be casted in a doubtful light.
2348:
Further, as an aside, I would like to suggest that you keep the passive aggressive comments out, as they dont aid you in building the
Knowledge (XXG). One set of reverts in three days being stretched as "active on other articles" to allege stonewalling is
3004:
sure if my edits could have been considered CE or rewording— my memory is fuzzy, I don't fully remember what I was trying to do). When I get home in a couple hours I'll look through my edits and the sources and try to identify the misconstrued changes. —
3098:
It was clearly written in the article "DIG Investigation Shariq Jamal Khan said 110 cases were discarded after they turned out to be false, as he noted that sexual assault cases used to take place earlier as well, but women would refrain from lodging an
3134:
It is not not appropriate to question the ethnicity of other editors or determine they are acting maliciously and without good faith strictly because of their perceived ethnicity. They should be judged on the merits of the content of their edits alone.
2370:
At no point in time I see anyone objecting to adding content on the investigation and arrests. The discussion was only on whether to include Amir Sohail's name, which is not what I'm objecting to here. Once again, I'm objecting to your mass removal
2524:". In my edit, I had only two paragraphs on the October arrests totalling 990 characters in an article of 22000 characters (meaning just 4-5% of the article text). How can that be "blown out of proportion" when it was covered by so many newspapers
153:
3161:
evidence came to light that caused many to doubt the validity of the incident. These facts weren't even mentioned here. Some articles referencing this them were included in the page but details from them weren't even quoted. For example
1687:
which goes into great detail to mention that the accused attacker was David DePape. DePape doesn't look like a public figure before the crime, yet it would be ridiculous to not include him (and any attempt to do that would quickly get
1504:
477:
aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
3362:
Do you intend to edit using the other account and this one? Either way you should link the two accounts by disclosing that you have multiple accounts on the user page for both accounts and make sure to include the username.
3308:
i was logged in in my laptop and got it back yesterday after I had given it for fixing. So I have my old account back. Still I was logged in on
Knowledge (XXG) on my phone with this account. So I was using it to make edits.
2651:
Since you mentioned the RfC, let me ping everyone who participated in it (and hasn't commented on talk recently, and hasn't be tbanned). The question is whether material covering the October arrests (mentioned in these RS
1532:
Any such allegation shouldn't be in wikivoice and clearly attributed, but removing such critical details from the article is quite inappropriate. And some mention of the arrest of Rambo and others needs to be in the lead
3056:
attributing "Some" which gives the statement a certain weight. I am not opposed to re-adding such statement if the editor properly attributes it with the appropriate citation for verification of such a statement.
2470:
2) Almost every lawyer, spokesperson, professor, journalist etc are a paid employee of someone. In this case, the associate's lawyer is presenting the associate's side of the story, which we should include as per
2133:. But as I pointed out above, there is no policy grounds to not mention his name on an article that is all about a crime he is alleged to have committed. We can start a more focused RfC on that if you don't agree.
1856:
I can agree to that being in the article body rather than the lead. Almost all of the sources do place a total number arrested to this point. A total of 13 with Sohail being the one most connected to the victim.
2659:
2531:
2491:
I also find your move of content about global concerns over the incident from a section of prominence to out of place in "other reactions" lacking such prominence to be objectionable. That does not conform to
2927:
Sherriff, your conflicts with others don't involve me and don't excuse edit warring. If you think you are being hounded or you believe there are other behavior issues that need admin attention please go to
44:
2052:
is what it would look like if Sohail was mentioned by name. I have self-reverted the name of the suspect out of courtesy, but ATM I believe we ought to name the suspect as he's been named in dozens of RS.
1635:
Alright, we'll wait for that RfC to be closed. But normally we include information on alleged criminals so long as this information is verifiable from multiple reliable sources - which it is in this case.
1528:
This may already have been covered above, but why does this article not mention Akram's associate Rambo, especially as he was arrested by the police and accused by Akram as masterminding the mass sexual
318:
3131:
The writer of the article said Khan had received earlier criticism for statements made. So through their investigation they are saying critics have questioned his statements. It is an accurate summary.
2798:, please stop edit warring. Sheriff you were technically right to remove what was written as it is a misrepresentation but if you had done a little more research, that section was highly rewritten by
2116:
You were supposed to propose and gain consensus first. Now that the RfC closed as no consensus, you neeed to be more careful with introducing controversial changes related to this particular subject.
609:
712:
147:
283:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1456:
3703:
3593:
1114:
284:
3162:
1806:
I would want to see how it would be written up and proper discussion given to what would be included in any such statement. Local consensus would have to be met prior to any inclusion. --
1289:
190:
3663:
1957:. We do this in probably every other such article on wikipedia. The reason we name Sohail is because multiple RS have named him. We are simply following the sources, no more, no less.
1708:
Unless it's clearly defined policy then consensus is local to each article so I don't consider other articles about crime when I look at this one. This is a stand alone article. Find
1104:
2176:
It makes sense to include the reactions of people where it has been covered by secondary sources. But we give a lot of space to the reaction of Maria Amir's editorial. Her piece is
3488:
I am not angry but many new editors misunderstand the purpose of Knowledge (XXG). I am trying to give you guidance. Apparently that is not being received well so I will stop. --
584:
279:
256:
3668:
3658:
1355:
1080:
3693:
3179:
We are not duty bound to present all perspectives. We duty bound to present the perspective of reliable sources in a neutral manner. Sources do not have to be neutral, we do.
559:
753:
789:
634:
513:
1345:
2267:
the information about the investigation and October arrests in this case. Why? Simply saying there is "no consensus" without giving any reason to oppose the content is
3698:
3688:
3183:
on the article with a position similar to one you espouse. And all of this on the first ever article you have attempted to edit on Knowledge (XXG) with this user name.
3213:
statements that don't fit your perspective is bias. Furthermore I proposed the article for deletion as it wasn't updated and the text read like newspaper headlines.
3673:
3618:
3125:. You have not offended me. This is the way to resolve disputes. Rather than going back and forth reverting each other, we are tasked to engage is civil discussion.
503:
1071:
1032:
3588:
308:
1406:
1378:
1321:
2593:
when they are mentioned by at least 6 RS that I mentioned above? I can provide more RS if necessary - how many RS do you require to realize that this is highly
2467:
1) I didn't find many international sources on the investigation. Can you provide some quotes on what international sources have to say about the investigation?
79:
3678:
3623:
3613:
2510:
The possible rearranging of the "Reactions" section doesn't explain why you removed details on the investigation and arrests, please discuss that separately.
1009:
904:
423:
3583:
555:
3163:
https://pakistanfrontier.com/2021/08/19/investigation-reveals-ayesha-akram-planned-minar-e-pakistan-incident-as-a-publicity-stunt-with-her-partner-rambo/
2188:-ness. Same thing for Soha Nisar. In addition, the reaction section looks like a quote farm, where we simply copy and paste long quotes from individuals.
168:
3648:
3633:
3603:
2743:
As long as we do not name anyone it seems fine to say how many were arrested, and what many of the charged were. We are after all discussing a crime.
1782:
1312:
1273:
999:
894:
413:
135:
24:
602:
85:
2655:
2613:
It has been 14 days (2 weeks) since my last comment, yet Captain Jack Sparrow hasn't responded, so I'm going to go ahead and restore the material.
2527:
1776:
1790:. There really is no doubt that Amir Sohail (aka "Rambo") has been accused by the victim, arrested by the police and charged with sexual assault.
479:
469:
446:
2657:
2529:
1455:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been
3653:
3643:
3638:
3628:
3608:
3598:
975:
870:
627:
389:
2682:
2535:
3227:
furthermore I did apologise for questioning the creator. Why are you being so angry? I only gave an opinion. Is no one allowed to do that?
129:
30:
3128:
I reverted my removal of the statement as you provided an accurate statement from the source that I simply must have missed. My apologies.
2513:
Details of the police investigation are certainly relevant and we don't need to worry about size, as this article is not too long (as per
2325:(who is active on other articles) to please respond to the questions above. Mass removal of content from an article needs to be justified.
1166:
616:
3683:
1234:
2436:, for the 4th time, what exactly is your objection to this content? If you do not respond, I will go ahead and re-instate the content.
698:
125:
663:
99:
2063:
1544:
3041:"Mr Khan has himself been criticised for suggesting that a rise in sexual violence has been fuelled by how women dress and behave."
966:
927:
861:
822:
380:
341:
104:
20:
1577:
3093:
2551:" yet the sources, RS, give significant coverage to the relationship between the victim and the accused. We can't omit that info.
2004:
but I hope that instead of reverting, you'll modify it as you see fit, and then I'll modify it etc. Otherwise next step would be
1788:
175:
74:
3241:
i have edited Knowledge (XXG) before. But this account is new. I made it because i forgot my password and couldn't retrieve it
1475:
1452:
1157:
1137:
705:
548:
231:
1320:
and related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1225:
1205:
591:
65:
739:
2558:" can you explain why court rulings relevant to the sexual assault would be UNDUE in an article about the sexual assault?
1471:
1621:
The RfC cannot be used as an argument until it has been concluded. There is no reason to ignore WP:BLPCRIME until then.
141:
3549:
as mine, and refrain from deleting well-cited content or adding unsourced or poorly sourced material to this article.
3059:
In my opinion this editor is pushing a particular narrative, even going so far as to asking if the article creator is
2886:
2843:
3545:
You requested assistance on my talk page, but I'm currently occupied with other tasks. Please regard the opinion of @
577:
2661:
2533:
185:
771:
109:
3562:
2916:
680:
2900:
2268:
1463:
1288:
1267:
199:
2276:
694:
3047:. These statements are accurately attributed and relevant to the discussion of the article and should remain.
2341:
You know that the material regarding it was contentious based on the discussion above, and were told to avoid
746:
474:
237:
219:
2698:
3568:
3522:
3508:
3461:
3436:
3422:
3397:
3383:
3357:
3343:
3318:
3303:
3289:
3275:
3250:
3236:
3222:
3207:
3174:
3155:
3116:
3086:
3012:
2998:
2972:
2952:
2922:
2890:
2876:
2847:
2828:
2776:
2752:
2734:
2624:
2608:
2584:
2569:
2505:
2486:
2462:
2447:
2423:
2397:
2358:
2336:
2315:
2250:
2228:
2199:
2159:
2144:
2125:
2104:
2076:
2019:
1994:
1968:
1940:
1914:
1894:
1877:
1851:
1826:
1801:
1732:
1699:
1671:
1646:
1630:
1616:
1591:
1563:
1518:
652:
2882:
2839:
2795:
2748:
1217:
1199:
1063:
2214:
2181:
1505:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests/Archives/2021#A section copy edit request
1474:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
1467:
719:
55:
3518:
3432:
3393:
3353:
3314:
3299:
3285:
3246:
3232:
3218:
3170:
3112:
2772:
2730:
2620:
2604:
2565:
2482:
2443:
2393:
2332:
2311:
2246:
2224:
2195:
2140:
2130:
As you can notice, I only made the edit to show what it would look like in the article and self-reverted
2059:
2015:
1964:
1910:
1900:
1890:
1847:
1797:
1785:
1745:
1695:
1684:
1667:
1642:
1587:
1540:
1499:
1494:
1233:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1165:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1079:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
974:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
869:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
388:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2668:
2375:, as you can see it has nothing to do with the name. Since you mentioned their comment, I'll also ping
1757:
1568:
1551:
70:
2345:. You went ahead anyway. Propose contentious material first before trying to force it into an article.
3550:
2904:
2791:
2580:
2501:
2458:
2354:
2121:
1626:
1559:
203:
2177:
2151:
1057:
1047:
1026:
641:
566:
3501:
3454:
3427:
I'll delete this account. My mentor for this new account hasn't been active for a long time anyway
3415:
3376:
3336:
3268:
3200:
3148:
3079:
2991:
2945:
2869:
2821:
2416:
2155:
2097:
1987:
1933:
1870:
1819:
1769:
1725:
1609:
725:
161:
2493:
674:
204:
3092:
my apologies if I offended anyone. When I looked at the site geo news that quoted the statistic
2903:
me here and started to revert me mindlessly without thinking what they were actually restoring.
2590:
760:
3094:
https://www.geo.tv/latest/371953-lahore-sees-300-surge-in-registration-of-sexual-assault-cases
2744:
2714:
2706:
2674:
1835:
51:
2514:
2472:
732:
3542:
3514:
3428:
3389:
3349:
3310:
3295:
3281:
3242:
3228:
3214:
3166:
3122:
3108:
3028:
2767:
2725:
2615:
2599:
2560:
2477:
2438:
2388:
2327:
2306:
2241:
2219:
2190:
2135:
2111:
2070:
incident. It was a surprising turn in the case which baffled the investigators as per Dawn.
2054:
2010:
1959:
1905:
1885:
1842:
1834:
Sohail denied all allegations against him. In February 2022, Sohail was granted bail by the
1792:
1773:
1765:
1690:
1662:
1637:
1582:
1535:
1514:
1401:
1317:
837:
816:
690:
201:
2929:
2664:
2594:
2210:
2185:
2001:
1554:
as he is not notable enough to be included here and he is not alone to have been arrested.
3010:
2970:
2576:
2497:
2454:
2431:
2365:
2350:
2322:
2271:. For example, I'd like to know why CapnJackSp finds the following content objectionable:
2261:
2117:
1622:
1555:
1076:
958:
853:
372:
2544:" Why on earth would we not include this detail? It is extremely relevant to the article.
2005:
3546:
3489:
3442:
3403:
3364:
3324:
3256:
3188:
3136:
3067:
2979:
2933:
2896:
2857:
2834:
2809:
2690:
2404:
2378:
2294:
That one of the arrested was the victim's associate and the victim herself accused him.
2085:
1975:
1947:
1921:
1858:
1807:
1779:
1739:
1713:
1678:
1597:
1304:
535:
3577:
1753:
685:
2386:
I am asking you for the third time, what exactly is your objection to this content?
1444:
461:
440:
1495:
Talk:Minar-e-Pakistan#En masse public molestation and sexual violence against women
1397:
1390:
1372:
2300:
That the arrested associated was granted bail, though the prosecution opposed it.
2073:
1510:
2304:
Most of this content seems to have never even been discussed on this talk page.
1149:
1131:
942:
921:
3039:
with an edit summary of "Removed wrongly quoted detail" yet the source states
3005:
2965:
2799:
1749:
1294:
1053:
948:
843:
777:
362:
847:
356:
335:
2297:
That the associate's family and lawyer denied all allegations against him.
1712:
quality reliable sources and then I might be willing to alter my views. --
1899:
Again, consider that David DePape is mentioned in the first paragraph of
971:
385:
2048:
is the content on the arrests, claims and counter-claims, and hearings.
2343:
this "shoot first and ask questions after the fact approach" to editing
866:
1162:
2653:
2525:
2071:
1761:
1530:
2282:
1230:
271:
250:
1580:
there seems to be consensus that Rambo is indeed a public figure.
1883:
of a crime is pretty important to an article about said crime.
1511:
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge'
1439:
213:
205:
15:
2556:
as court proceedings over grant of bail to accused are UNDUE
2213:
due to the author's non-notability and failing to find any
2899:
They were having conflict with me on other pages and they
1462:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
293:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
3061:
3052:
3036:
2804:
2762:
2720:
2372:
2264:
2236:
2206:
2184:
sources that cite her reaction, as that would indicate
2131:
2049:
2045:
713:
Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs of gender studies
3348:
yes but not on this article or any articles like this
160:
3513:
Can you delete our conversation from this talk page.
2667:
for inclusion in the article and whether it violates
2964:
so without overwriting any edits that came after. —
2881:
Thanks I'll take care and do the needful next time.
1316:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1229:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1161:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1075:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
970:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
865:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
384:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
174:
2549:they should simply mention the no. of arrests made
2180:for her own views. It would be better if we found
1089:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
3704:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
3594:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
2522:The "October arrests" are blown out of proportion
2288:That the geofencing was done based on call times.
1416:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
296:Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
3323:have you made edits with this other account? --
3664:Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
8:
3388:no I only intend to use my earlier account.
3669:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
3659:Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
3031:has made a series of edits to the article.
1330:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women's History
1092:Template:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
217:
1955:in an article that is about the said crime
1419:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
1367:
1262:
1194:
1126:
1021:
916:
811:
560:Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
543:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
521:
488:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Gender studies
435:
330:
245:
3402:You still must disclose both accounts. --
2765:did not contain any names of the accused.
2275:That the matter was initially handled by
790:Gender studies articles needing attention
635:Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
25:2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault
280:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
3694:Low-importance Women's History articles
2291:That new arrests were mad on October 8.
1369:
1264:
1196:
1128:
1023:
918:
813:
437:
332:
247:
3674:Start-Class WikiProject Women articles
3619:Low-importance Gender studies articles
3441:Moved discussion to user talk page. --
3294:And I retrieved my password yesterday
3107:they had a particular agenda in mind.
3044:
3040:
2555:
2548:
2541:
2521:
2342:
1832:
1572:
1523:
3589:Low-importance Crime-related articles
2542:if October arrests are to be included
2217:RS that mentioned the author's views.
7:
3699:WikiProject Women's History articles
3689:Start-Class Women's History articles
2281:That photos and videos were sent to
2257:Removal of investigation and arrests
1333:Template:WikiProject Women's History
1310:This article is within the scope of
1223:This article is within the scope of
1155:This article is within the scope of
1069:This article is within the scope of
984:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pakistan
964:This article is within the scope of
879:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Holidays
859:This article is within the scope of
398:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Feminism
378:This article is within the scope of
277:This article is within the scope of
3679:All WikiProject Women-related pages
3624:WikiProject Gender studies articles
3614:Start-Class Gender studies articles
491:Template:WikiProject Gender studies
23:for discussing improvements to the
3584:Start-Class Crime-related articles
2723:is example wording of the arrests.
1500:Talk:Minar-e-Pakistan#Removed text
1175:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject TikTok
1072:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
556:Unassessed Gender studies articles
14:
1953:someone in relation to the crime
1243:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women
699:Women's education in Saudi Arabia
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
3649:Low-importance Pakistan articles
3634:Low-importance Holidays articles
3604:Low-importance Feminism articles
2575:addressing the extant concerns.
1524:Why isn't Amir Sohail mentioned?
1443:
1389:
1371:
1297:
1287:
1266:
1216:
1198:
1148:
1130:
1056:
1046:
1025:
951:
941:
920:
846:
836:
815:
534:
460:
439:
365:
355:
334:
270:
249:
218:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
3255:Do you recall your username? --
3121:Thank you for responding here,
2589:How can the October arrests be
2209:the reaction, not seeing it as
1350:This article has been rated as
1109:This article has been rated as
1095:Sexology and sexuality articles
1004:This article has been rated as
899:This article has been rated as
508:This article has been rated as
418:This article has been rated as
313:This article has been rated as
1519:11:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
1422:Guild of Copy Editors articles
236:It is of interest to multiple
1:
3654:WikiProject Pakistan articles
3644:Start-Class Pakistan articles
3639:WikiProject Holidays articles
3629:Start-Class Holidays articles
3609:WikiProject Feminism articles
3599:Start-Class Feminism articles
3023:Recent removals and additions
2777:15:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
2625:15:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
2570:12:05, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
2506:20:06, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
2487:17:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
2463:09:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
2448:00:49, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
2424:19:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
2398:09:51, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
2359:08:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
2337:22:21, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
2316:12:47, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
2251:15:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
2229:09:38, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
2160:17:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
2145:12:40, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
2126:07:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
1768:which is probably Pakistan's
1476:contentious topics procedures
1324:and see a list of open tasks.
1237:and see a list of open tasks.
1169:and see a list of open tasks.
1083:and see a list of open tasks.
987:Template:WikiProject Pakistan
978:and see a list of open tasks.
882:Template:WikiProject Holidays
873:and see a list of open tasks.
401:Template:WikiProject Feminism
392:and see a list of open tasks.
287:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
3013:16:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
2999:15:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
2973:15:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
2953:15:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
2923:14:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
2891:13:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
2877:13:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
2848:13:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
2829:13:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
2753:11:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
2735:21:54, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
2609:21:54, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
2585:12:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
2200:22:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
2105:20:47, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
2077:20:44, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
2064:20:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
2020:19:42, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
1995:15:04, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
1969:14:54, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
1941:13:10, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
1915:20:08, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
1895:20:06, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
1878:19:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
1852:14:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
1827:13:52, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
1802:13:27, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
1733:12:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
1700:03:08, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
1672:22:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
1647:21:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
1631:17:36, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
1617:13:57, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
1592:10:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
1564:06:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
1545:23:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
290:Crime and Criminal Biography
257:Crime and Criminal Biography
2084:(XXG) has no time limit. --
1313:WikiProject Women's History
1178:Template:WikiProject TikTok
3720:
3684:WikiProject Women articles
2172:Whose reaction to include?
1772:. It is also mentioned by
1683:Also consider the article
1464:purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
1356:project's importance scale
1249:WikiProject Women articles
1246:Template:WikiProject Women
1115:project's importance scale
1010:project's importance scale
905:project's importance scale
514:project's importance scale
470:WikiProject Gender studies
424:project's importance scale
319:project's importance scale
3066:the article talk page. --
2239:placement in the article.
2235:I have removed this quote
1478:before editing this page.
1384:
1349:
1282:
1211:
1143:
1108:
1041:
1003:
936:
898:
831:
681:Brannon Masculinity Scale
520:
507:
455:
417:
350:
312:
265:
244:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
2277:Punjab Police (Pakistan)
1472:normal editorial process
1336:Women's History articles
695:Michael Kaufman (author)
467:This article is part of
3569:14:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3523:14:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3509:13:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3462:14:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3437:14:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3423:14:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3398:14:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3384:13:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3358:13:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3344:13:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3319:13:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3304:13:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3290:13:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3276:13:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3251:13:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3237:13:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3223:13:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3208:12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3175:12:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3156:12:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3117:12:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
3087:11:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
1459:as a contentious topic.
494:Gender studies articles
2761:The material that was
1468:standards of behaviour
1086:Sexology and sexuality
1064:Human sexuality portal
1033:Sexology and sexuality
299:Crime-related articles
226:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
2321:A gentle reminder to
1901:Attack on Paul Pelosi
1786:The Nation (Pakistan)
1685:Attack on Paul Pelosi
1413:Guild of Copy Editors
1407:Guild of Copy Editors
1379:Guild of Copy Editors
610:/Sexuality and gender
482:for more information.
230:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
2577:Captain Jack Sparrow
2498:Captain Jack Sparrow
2455:Captain Jack Sparrow
2351:Captain Jack Sparrow
2205:I've gone ahead and
2118:Captain Jack Sparrow
1623:Captain Jack Sparrow
1556:Captain Jack Sparrow
1489:Relevant discussions
967:WikiProject Pakistan
862:WikiProject Holidays
740:Gender studies stubs
381:WikiProject Feminism
105:No original research
2428:Thanks, ARoseWolf.
2285:for identification.
1770:newspaper of record
1764:I provided is from
1410:, on 21 March 2023.
726:History of feminism
1453:contentious topics
1404:, a member of the
1158:WikiProject TikTok
232:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
2883:HistoriesUnveiler
2840:HistoriesUnveiler
2796:HistoriesUnveiler
2699:Sylvester Millner
1836:Lahore High Court
1483:
1482:
1438:
1437:
1434:
1433:
1430:
1429:
1396:This article was
1366:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1256:
1226:WikiProject Women
1193:
1192:
1189:
1188:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1120:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1015:
990:Pakistan articles
915:
914:
911:
910:
885:Holidays articles
810:
809:
806:
805:
802:
801:
798:
797:
434:
433:
430:
429:
404:Feminism articles
329:
328:
325:
324:
212:
211:
66:Assume good faith
43:
3711:
3506:
3499:
3494:
3459:
3452:
3447:
3420:
3413:
3408:
3381:
3374:
3369:
3341:
3334:
3329:
3273:
3266:
3261:
3205:
3198:
3193:
3153:
3146:
3141:
3084:
3077:
3072:
3064:
3054:
3038:
3008:
2996:
2989:
2984:
2968:
2950:
2943:
2938:
2874:
2867:
2862:
2826:
2819:
2814:
2807:
2718:
2710:
2702:
2694:
2686:
2678:
2435:
2421:
2414:
2409:
2382:
2369:
2115:
2102:
2095:
2090:
1992:
1985:
1980:
1951:
1938:
1931:
1926:
1875:
1868:
1863:
1831:Something like "
1824:
1817:
1812:
1774:The Friday Times
1766:Dawn (newspaper)
1743:
1730:
1723:
1718:
1682:
1614:
1607:
1602:
1578:in the above RfC
1447:
1440:
1424:
1423:
1420:
1417:
1414:
1393:
1386:
1385:
1375:
1368:
1338:
1337:
1334:
1331:
1328:
1307:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1291:
1284:
1283:
1278:
1270:
1263:
1251:
1250:
1247:
1244:
1241:
1220:
1213:
1212:
1202:
1195:
1183:
1182:
1179:
1176:
1173:
1152:
1145:
1144:
1134:
1127:
1097:
1096:
1093:
1090:
1087:
1066:
1061:
1060:
1050:
1043:
1042:
1037:
1029:
1022:
992:
991:
988:
985:
982:
961:
956:
955:
954:
945:
938:
937:
932:
924:
917:
887:
886:
883:
880:
877:
856:
851:
850:
840:
833:
832:
827:
819:
812:
691:Media and gender
603:Deletion sorting
538:
531:
530:
522:
496:
495:
492:
489:
486:
464:
457:
456:
451:
443:
436:
406:
405:
402:
399:
396:
375:
370:
369:
368:
359:
352:
351:
346:
338:
331:
301:
300:
297:
294:
291:
274:
267:
266:
261:
253:
246:
229:
223:
222:
214:
206:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
3719:
3718:
3714:
3713:
3712:
3710:
3709:
3708:
3574:
3573:
3502:
3495:
3490:
3455:
3448:
3443:
3416:
3409:
3404:
3377:
3370:
3365:
3337:
3330:
3325:
3269:
3262:
3257:
3201:
3194:
3189:
3149:
3142:
3137:
3080:
3073:
3068:
3060:
3051:
3035:
3025:
3006:
2992:
2985:
2980:
2966:
2946:
2939:
2934:
2870:
2863:
2858:
2822:
2815:
2810:
2803:
2792:SheriffIsInTown
2789:
2775:
2733:
2712:
2704:
2696:
2688:
2680:
2672:
2623:
2607:
2568:
2485:
2446:
2429:
2417:
2410:
2405:
2396:
2376:
2363:
2335:
2314:
2269:WP:STONEWALLING
2259:
2249:
2227:
2198:
2174:
2143:
2109:
2098:
2091:
2086:
2062:
2018:
1988:
1981:
1976:
1967:
1945:
1934:
1927:
1922:
1913:
1893:
1871:
1864:
1859:
1850:
1820:
1813:
1808:
1800:
1746:this discussion
1737:
1726:
1719:
1714:
1698:
1676:
1670:
1645:
1610:
1603:
1598:
1590:
1543:
1526:
1491:
1466:, any expected
1421:
1418:
1415:
1412:
1411:
1335:
1332:
1329:
1327:Women's History
1326:
1325:
1318:Women's history
1303:
1298:
1296:
1276:
1274:Women's History
1248:
1245:
1242:
1239:
1238:
1181:TikTok articles
1180:
1177:
1174:
1171:
1170:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1077:human sexuality
1062:
1055:
1035:
989:
986:
983:
980:
979:
959:Pakistan portal
957:
952:
950:
930:
884:
881:
878:
875:
874:
854:Holidays portal
852:
845:
825:
794:
784:Needs attention
493:
490:
487:
484:
483:
449:
403:
400:
397:
394:
393:
373:Feminism portal
371:
366:
364:
344:
298:
295:
292:
289:
288:
259:
227:
208:
207:
202:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
3717:
3715:
3707:
3706:
3701:
3696:
3691:
3686:
3681:
3676:
3671:
3666:
3661:
3656:
3651:
3646:
3641:
3636:
3631:
3626:
3621:
3616:
3611:
3606:
3601:
3596:
3591:
3586:
3576:
3575:
3572:
3571:
3539:
3538:
3537:
3536:
3535:
3534:
3533:
3532:
3531:
3530:
3529:
3528:
3527:
3526:
3525:
3486:
3485:
3484:
3483:
3482:
3481:
3480:
3479:
3478:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3474:
3473:
3472:
3471:
3470:
3469:
3468:
3467:
3466:
3465:
3464:
3184:
3180:
3132:
3129:
3126:
3104:
3100:
3096:
3024:
3021:
3020:
3019:
3018:
3017:
3016:
3015:
2961:
2960:
2959:
2958:
2957:
2956:
2955:
2893:
2851:
2850:
2788:
2785:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2780:
2779:
2771:
2756:
2755:
2738:
2737:
2729:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2619:
2603:
2564:
2552:
2545:
2538:
2518:
2511:
2481:
2468:
2442:
2426:
2392:
2384:
2346:
2331:
2310:
2302:
2301:
2298:
2295:
2292:
2289:
2286:
2279:
2258:
2255:
2254:
2253:
2245:
2232:
2231:
2223:
2194:
2173:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2139:
2080:
2079:
2058:
2043:
2042:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2014:
1963:
1909:
1897:
1889:
1846:
1796:
1780:Daily Pakistan
1703:
1702:
1694:
1674:
1666:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1641:
1619:
1586:
1539:
1525:
1522:
1508:
1507:
1502:
1497:
1490:
1487:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1448:
1436:
1435:
1432:
1431:
1428:
1427:
1425:
1394:
1382:
1381:
1376:
1364:
1363:
1360:
1359:
1352:Low-importance
1348:
1342:
1341:
1339:
1322:the discussion
1309:
1308:
1305:History portal
1292:
1280:
1279:
1277:Low‑importance
1271:
1259:
1258:
1255:
1254:
1252:
1235:the discussion
1221:
1209:
1208:
1203:
1191:
1190:
1187:
1186:
1184:
1167:the discussion
1153:
1141:
1140:
1135:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1118:
1111:Low-importance
1107:
1101:
1100:
1098:
1081:the discussion
1068:
1067:
1051:
1039:
1038:
1036:Low‑importance
1030:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1013:
1006:Low-importance
1002:
996:
995:
993:
976:the discussion
963:
962:
946:
934:
933:
931:Low‑importance
925:
913:
912:
909:
908:
901:Low-importance
897:
891:
890:
888:
871:the discussion
858:
857:
841:
829:
828:
826:Low‑importance
820:
808:
807:
804:
803:
800:
799:
796:
795:
793:
792:
780:
767:
756:
742:
728:
715:
701:
670:
659:
648:
637:
623:
612:
598:
587:
585:/Collaboration
573:
562:
542:
540:
539:
527:
526:
518:
517:
510:Low-importance
506:
500:
499:
497:
485:Gender studies
465:
453:
452:
450:Low‑importance
447:Gender studies
444:
432:
431:
428:
427:
420:Low-importance
416:
410:
409:
407:
390:the discussion
377:
376:
360:
348:
347:
345:Low‑importance
339:
327:
326:
323:
322:
315:Low-importance
311:
305:
304:
302:
285:the discussion
275:
263:
262:
260:Low‑importance
254:
242:
241:
235:
224:
210:
209:
200:
198:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3716:
3705:
3702:
3700:
3697:
3695:
3692:
3690:
3687:
3685:
3682:
3680:
3677:
3675:
3672:
3670:
3667:
3665:
3662:
3660:
3657:
3655:
3652:
3650:
3647:
3645:
3642:
3640:
3637:
3635:
3632:
3630:
3627:
3625:
3622:
3620:
3617:
3615:
3612:
3610:
3607:
3605:
3602:
3600:
3597:
3595:
3592:
3590:
3587:
3585:
3582:
3581:
3579:
3570:
3566:
3565:
3560:
3559:
3556:
3553:
3548:
3544:
3540:
3524:
3520:
3516:
3512:
3511:
3510:
3507:
3505:
3500:
3498:
3493:
3487:
3463:
3460:
3458:
3453:
3451:
3446:
3440:
3439:
3438:
3434:
3430:
3426:
3425:
3424:
3421:
3419:
3414:
3412:
3407:
3401:
3400:
3399:
3395:
3391:
3387:
3386:
3385:
3382:
3380:
3375:
3373:
3368:
3361:
3360:
3359:
3355:
3351:
3347:
3346:
3345:
3342:
3340:
3335:
3333:
3328:
3322:
3321:
3320:
3316:
3312:
3307:
3306:
3305:
3301:
3297:
3293:
3292:
3291:
3287:
3283:
3279:
3278:
3277:
3274:
3272:
3267:
3265:
3260:
3254:
3253:
3252:
3248:
3244:
3240:
3239:
3238:
3234:
3230:
3226:
3225:
3224:
3220:
3216:
3211:
3210:
3209:
3206:
3204:
3199:
3197:
3192:
3185:
3181:
3178:
3177:
3176:
3172:
3168:
3164:
3159:
3158:
3157:
3154:
3152:
3147:
3145:
3140:
3133:
3130:
3127:
3124:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3114:
3110:
3105:
3101:
3097:
3095:
3091:
3090:
3089:
3088:
3085:
3083:
3078:
3076:
3071:
3063:
3057:
3053:
3048:
3046:
3042:
3037:
3032:
3030:
3022:
3014:
3011:
3009:
3002:
3001:
3000:
2997:
2995:
2990:
2988:
2983:
2976:
2975:
2974:
2971:
2969:
2962:
2954:
2951:
2949:
2944:
2942:
2937:
2931:
2926:
2925:
2924:
2920:
2919:
2914:
2913:
2910:
2907:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2892:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2879:
2878:
2875:
2873:
2868:
2866:
2861:
2855:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2849:
2845:
2841:
2836:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2827:
2825:
2820:
2818:
2813:
2806:
2801:
2797:
2793:
2786:
2778:
2774:
2770:
2769:
2764:
2760:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2754:
2750:
2746:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2736:
2732:
2728:
2727:
2722:
2716:
2708:
2700:
2692:
2684:
2676:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2660:
2658:
2656:
2654:
2650:
2649:
2626:
2622:
2618:
2617:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2606:
2602:
2601:
2596:
2592:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2582:
2578:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2567:
2563:
2562:
2557:
2553:
2550:
2546:
2543:
2539:
2536:
2534:
2532:
2530:
2528:
2526:
2523:
2519:
2516:
2512:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2484:
2480:
2479:
2474:
2469:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2445:
2441:
2440:
2433:
2427:
2425:
2422:
2420:
2415:
2413:
2408:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2390:
2385:
2380:
2374:
2367:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2356:
2352:
2347:
2344:
2340:
2339:
2338:
2334:
2330:
2329:
2324:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2313:
2309:
2308:
2299:
2296:
2293:
2290:
2287:
2284:
2280:
2278:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2270:
2266:
2263:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2243:
2237:
2234:
2233:
2230:
2226:
2222:
2221:
2216:
2212:
2208:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2192:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2171:
2161:
2157:
2153:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2137:
2132:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2123:
2119:
2113:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2103:
2101:
2096:
2094:
2089:
2082:
2081:
2078:
2075:
2072:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2051:
2047:
2021:
2017:
2013:
2012:
2007:
2003:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1993:
1991:
1986:
1984:
1979:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1961:
1956:
1949:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1939:
1937:
1932:
1930:
1925:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1907:
1902:
1898:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1887:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1876:
1874:
1869:
1867:
1862:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1844:
1839:
1837:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1825:
1823:
1818:
1816:
1811:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1794:
1789:
1787:
1783:
1781:
1777:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1741:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1731:
1729:
1724:
1722:
1717:
1711:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1692:
1686:
1680:
1675:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1664:
1658:
1657:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1639:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1618:
1615:
1613:
1608:
1606:
1601:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1584:
1579:
1575:
1570:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1537:
1531:
1521:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1506:
1503:
1501:
1498:
1496:
1493:
1492:
1488:
1486:
1479:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1460:
1458:
1454:
1449:
1446:
1442:
1441:
1426:
1409:
1408:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1392:
1388:
1387:
1383:
1380:
1377:
1374:
1370:
1357:
1353:
1347:
1344:
1343:
1340:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1314:
1306:
1295:
1293:
1290:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1275:
1272:
1269:
1265:
1253:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1222:
1219:
1215:
1214:
1210:
1207:
1204:
1201:
1197:
1185:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1139:
1136:
1133:
1129:
1116:
1112:
1106:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1073:
1065:
1059:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1034:
1031:
1028:
1024:
1011:
1007:
1001:
998:
997:
994:
977:
973:
969:
968:
960:
949:
947:
944:
940:
939:
935:
929:
926:
923:
919:
906:
902:
896:
893:
892:
889:
872:
868:
864:
863:
855:
849:
844:
842:
839:
835:
834:
830:
824:
821:
818:
814:
791:
787:
785:
781:
779:
776:
774:
773:
768:
765:
763:
762:
757:
755:
751:
749:
748:
743:
741:
737:
735:
734:
729:
727:
724:
722:
721:
716:
714:
710:
708:
707:
702:
700:
696:
692:
688:
687:
686:Holy Virility
682:
679:
677:
676:
671:
668:
666:
665:
660:
657:
655:
654:
649:
646:
644:
643:
638:
636:
632:
630:
629:
624:
621:
619:
618:
613:
611:
607:
605:
604:
599:
596:
594:
593:
588:
586:
582:
580:
579:
574:
571:
569:
568:
563:
561:
557:
553:
551:
550:
545:
544:
541:
537:
533:
532:
529:
528:
524:
523:
519:
515:
511:
505:
502:
501:
498:
481:
476:
472:
471:
466:
463:
459:
458:
454:
448:
445:
442:
438:
425:
421:
415:
412:
411:
408:
391:
387:
383:
382:
374:
363:
361:
358:
354:
353:
349:
343:
340:
337:
333:
320:
316:
310:
307:
306:
303:
286:
282:
281:
276:
273:
269:
268:
264:
258:
255:
252:
248:
243:
239:
233:
225:
221:
216:
215:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
3563:
3557:
3554:
3551:
3503:
3496:
3491:
3456:
3449:
3444:
3417:
3410:
3405:
3378:
3371:
3366:
3338:
3331:
3326:
3270:
3263:
3258:
3202:
3195:
3190:
3150:
3143:
3138:
3081:
3074:
3069:
3058:
3049:
3033:
3026:
2993:
2986:
2981:
2947:
2940:
2935:
2917:
2911:
2908:
2905:
2871:
2864:
2859:
2823:
2816:
2811:
2790:
2787:Edit Warring
2766:
2745:Slatersteven
2724:
2715:Figureofnine
2707:Writethisway
2675:Slatersteven
2614:
2598:
2559:
2517:guidelines).
2476:
2437:
2418:
2411:
2406:
2387:
2326:
2305:
2303:
2265:mass removed
2260:
2240:
2218:
2215:WP:SECONDARY
2189:
2182:WP:SECONDARY
2175:
2134:
2099:
2092:
2087:
2053:
2044:
2009:
1989:
1982:
1977:
1958:
1954:
1935:
1928:
1923:
1904:
1884:
1872:
1865:
1860:
1841:
1821:
1814:
1809:
1791:
1727:
1720:
1715:
1709:
1689:
1661:
1636:
1611:
1604:
1599:
1581:
1534:
1527:
1509:
1484:
1461:
1450:
1405:
1351:
1311:
1224:
1156:
1110:
1070:
1005:
965:
900:
860:
783:
782:
770:
769:
759:
758:
754:/translation
745:
744:
731:
730:
718:
717:
704:
703:
684:
673:
672:
662:
661:
651:
650:
640:
639:
626:
625:
615:
614:
601:
600:
590:
589:
576:
575:
565:
564:
547:
546:
509:
480:project page
468:
419:
379:
314:
278:
238:WikiProjects
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
3543:Hateglitter
3515:Hateglitter
3429:Hateglitter
3390:Hateglitter
3350:Hateglitter
3311:Hateglitter
3296:Hateglitter
3282:Hateglitter
3243:Hateglitter
3229:Hateglitter
3215:Hateglitter
3167:Hateglitter
3123:Hateglitter
3109:Hateglitter
3029:Hateglitter
2901:wikihounded
2669:WP:BLPCRIME
2349:ridiculous.
2112:Vice regent
1569:WP:BLPCRIME
1552:WP:BLPCRIME
1550:Because of
1402:KoolKidz112
1398:copy edited
766:edit to see
669:edit to see
658:edit to see
647:edit to see
622:edit to see
597:edit to see
578:Collaborate
572:edit to see
525:To-do list:
475:WikiProject
228:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
3578:Categories
2805:March 20th
2432:CapnJackSp
2366:CapnJackSp
2323:CapnJackSp
2262:CapnJackSp
2178:WP:PRIMARY
1688:reverted).
1457:designated
778:Riot grrrl
653:Notability
3547:ARoseWolf
3062:"Indian"
2897:ARoseWolf
2835:ARoseWolf
2691:Aquillion
2683:امین اکبر
2597:material?
2494:WP:WEIGHT
2379:ARoseWolf
2152:Kerberous
1948:ARoseWolf
1740:ARoseWolf
1679:ARoseWolf
1470:, or any
747:Translate
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
3103:article.
2591:WP:UNDUE
1754:Jclemens
1574:secured.
1529:assault?
981:Pakistan
972:Pakistan
928:Pakistan
876:Holidays
867:holidays
823:Holidays
592:Copyedit
473:. This
395:Feminism
386:Feminism
342:Feminism
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
3027:Editor
2763:removed
2515:WP:SIZE
2473:WP:NPOV
2207:removed
1533:itself.
1354:on the
1113:on the
1008:on the
903:on the
675:Orphans
628:Infobox
567:Cleanup
512:on the
422:on the
317:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
2930:WP:ANI
2665:WP:DUE
2595:WP:DUE
2211:WP:DUE
2186:WP:DUE
2074:USaamo
2002:WP:BRD
1762:source
1760:. The
1758:WT:BLP
1576:" Yet
1571:says "
1172:TikTok
1163:TikTok
1138:TikTok
772:Verify
761:Update
617:Expand
549:Assess
234:scale.
126:Google
3564:☎ 911
3099:FIR."
3007:theki
2967:theki
2918:☎ 911
2800:Theki
2663:) is
2453:this.
2283:NADRA
2006:WP:DR
1750:Masem
1748:with
1240:Women
1231:women
1206:Women
733:Stubs
720:Split
706:Photo
642:Merge
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
3519:talk
3504:Wolf
3497:Rose
3457:Wolf
3450:Rose
3433:talk
3418:Wolf
3411:Rose
3394:talk
3379:Wolf
3372:Rose
3354:talk
3339:Wolf
3332:Rose
3315:talk
3300:talk
3286:talk
3280:yes
3271:Wolf
3264:Rose
3247:talk
3233:talk
3219:talk
3203:Wolf
3196:Rose
3171:talk
3151:Wolf
3144:Rose
3113:talk
3082:Wolf
3075:Rose
3043:and
2994:Wolf
2987:Rose
2948:Wolf
2941:Rose
2887:talk
2872:Wolf
2865:Rose
2844:talk
2824:Wolf
2817:Rose
2794:and
2773:talk
2749:talk
2731:talk
2721:Here
2621:talk
2605:talk
2581:talk
2566:talk
2502:talk
2483:talk
2459:talk
2444:talk
2419:Wolf
2412:Rose
2394:talk
2373:here
2355:talk
2333:talk
2312:talk
2247:talk
2225:talk
2196:talk
2156:talk
2141:talk
2122:talk
2100:Wolf
2093:Rose
2060:talk
2050:This
2046:Here
2016:talk
2000:per
1990:Wolf
1983:Rose
1965:talk
1936:Wolf
1929:Rose
1911:talk
1891:talk
1873:Wolf
1866:Rose
1848:talk
1822:Wolf
1815:Rose
1798:talk
1784:and
1752:and
1744:see
1728:Wolf
1721:Rose
1710:high
1696:talk
1668:talk
1643:talk
1627:talk
1612:Wolf
1605:Rose
1588:talk
1560:talk
1541:talk
1515:talk
1451:The
788:see
752:see
738:see
711:see
664:NPOV
633:see
608:see
583:see
558:and
554:see
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
3555:eri
3050:b)
3034:a)
2909:eri
2802:on
1756:at
1400:by
1346:Low
1105:Low
1000:Low
895:Low
504:Low
414:Low
309:Low
176:TWL
3580::
3567:|
3561:|
3558:ff
3552:Sh
3521:)
3435:)
3396:)
3363:--
3356:)
3317:)
3302:)
3288:)
3249:)
3235:)
3221:)
3173:)
3135:--
3115:)
2978:--
2921:|
2915:|
2912:ff
2906:Sh
2889:)
2846:)
2768:VR
2751:)
2726:VR
2719:.
2711:,
2703:,
2695:,
2687:,
2679:,
2671::
2616:VR
2600:VR
2583:)
2561:VR
2504:)
2478:VR
2461:)
2439:VR
2389:VR
2357:)
2328:VR
2307:VR
2242:VR
2220:VR
2191:VR
2158:)
2136:VR
2124:)
2055:VR
2011:VR
1960:VR
1906:VR
1886:VR
1857:--
1843:VR
1793:VR
1778:,
1691:VR
1663:VR
1638:VR
1629:)
1583:VR
1562:)
1536:VR
1517:)
697:·
693:·
689:·
683:·
156:)
54:;
3541:@
3517:(
3492:A
3445:A
3431:(
3406:A
3392:(
3367:A
3352:(
3327:A
3313:(
3298:(
3284:(
3259:A
3245:(
3231:(
3217:(
3191:A
3169:(
3139:A
3111:(
3070:A
2982:A
2936:A
2895:@
2885:(
2860:A
2842:(
2812:A
2747:(
2717::
2713:@
2709::
2705:@
2701::
2697:@
2693::
2689:@
2685::
2681:@
2677::
2673:@
2579:(
2554:"
2547:"
2540:"
2537:?
2520:"
2500:(
2475:.
2457:(
2434::
2430:@
2407:A
2383:.
2381::
2377:@
2368::
2364:@
2353:(
2154:(
2120:(
2114::
2110:@
2088:A
2008:.
1978:A
1950::
1946:@
1924:A
1903:.
1861:A
1840:"
1838:.
1810:A
1742::
1738:@
1716:A
1681::
1677:@
1625:(
1600:A
1558:(
1513:(
1358:.
1117:.
1012:.
907:.
786::
775::
764::
750::
736::
723::
709::
678::
667::
656::
645::
631::
620::
606::
595::
581::
570::
552::
516:.
426:.
321:.
240:.
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.