Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:2021 South Moravia tornado

Source šŸ“

759:
supposed to work, but I see it's all been reverted. The rating once again conflicts with the source cited for the rating. We can call it F4 or EF4, but the article MUST match the source. We need to call it an EF4 or stop citing ref 1 for its severity rating and find a better RS that clearly shows this was an F4 tornado. Whoever is concerned enough to revert edits like that should find a RS to support the F4 rating. (I found the editor in the history page and left a detailed message on their talk page because they have not been part of the discussion here.) F4 or EF4, whatever, but the information has to match the source.
464: 243: 222: 361: 253: 476: 351: 327: 1045:
to mph would be higher than the original one). I personally feel the significant figure "rule" could be overlooked due to multiple sources saying the rounding is going to give incorrect values, but that's just my opinion. I might want to do an FAQ on this since someone converting themselves will see the 236 rather than 240, which would be that "endless loop" of increasing values when converting back.
191: 713:
I only changed references to the EF4 rating of this tornado because that is all I found in the source. The other tornadoes probably need to be changed too, but again, they were not mentioned in the source (ref 1). Note that ref 1 cites an official from the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute as their
1044:
Well that's dumb. Cool to note another fun instance of errors on Knowledge (XXG) due to technicalities. That honestly feels like a conversion template error since the rounding of the mph actually increases the km/h by over 6, which seems to mean an endless "loop" of increasing (since converting back
758:
I didn't intend to make any further edits. I'm not a very active editor on WP these days, and this sort of thing is part of the reason. Lately I've only edited the blatant stuff I see. I only changed the rating based on what was made explicit in the source cited for that rating, which is how this is
599:
I've got new informations that's why I upgraded the rating. WTINFO Tornado Research Project says on Facebook that they found definitely at least F4 damage on some places with also a few trees debarked for me it was also pretty sure as I saw the first pictures of damage that it had to be an F4 idk of
668:
I'm not sure who you're asking, but I wouldn't be surprised by an upgrade. But we still have to wait until the upgrade actually comes. If not, we stick with the official rating. We can always mention the possibility of F4 intensity so long as reliable sources state it. That's how we handle disputed
993:
to a false wind speed of 240 mph later in the day. Can we have a discussion as to what 380 km/h accurately converts to in mph? A Google search of "380 km/h to mph" shows dozens of websites that indicate 236.1 mph, not 240. In fact, converting 240 mph to km/h gives 386 km/h, not
955:(with CHMI and others) on the tornado. The rating was officially stated as IF4 (International Fujita) and the total path length changed. Since CHMI helped with the new report, should it be considered the new stats for the tornado over the original 2021 CHMI 80+ page report? 897:
I wondered that myself. Probably because we're dealing with separate nations instead of states or provinces within a country. Though this could also be this first time we've made a new table for a multi-national tornado outbreak since before we adopted the new format.
645:
Well even if the officials source may still say F3 for many that I asked it was definitely an F4 as more pictures of damage came in maybe there are updates by officials I will search for that. But from what I've heard we should see an upgrade coming
739:
I would hold on any other tornadoes unless we find sources claiming otherwise. We're dealing with an outbreak that affected several countries, so use of the Fujita, Enhanced Fujita, and TORRO scales may vary. The ESWD source still lists an
153: 684:@TornadoLGS yes I've send "chmi" a mail. I think it's the official weatherservice in the Czech Republic, maybe we'll become an update soon that would be helpful. have a nice day or night Greetings from Germany 997:
I personally believe the change back to 240 mph conversion introduces false information into the article, but I want to hear other's opinions on this issue before I consider a WikiProject talk page discussion.
780:
I'll cite the ESWD source, then, since it's official. I'm wary of news media sources on whether a tornado was rated on the F or EF scale, since such sources tend to erroneously use the scales interchangeably.
887:
I think he's referring to the format of the table, where tornadoes are grouped by country, (as we used to group tornadoes by state for U.S. tornadoes) not the use of the old F-scale over the new EF-scale.
1141: 147: 1136: 44: 397: 309: 392: 1116: 299: 422: 1121: 79: 1146: 1131: 448: 952: 275: 454: 412: 1111: 826:
For who was launched the campain and who got the aid? Were these, who got help Vietnamese families only or all, who were struck by tornado? Thanks,
1024:
which states ā€œConverted quantity values should use a level of precision similar to that of the source quantity valueā€. Please read the articles on
417: 402: 85: 489: 337: 266: 227: 1151: 407: 30: 577: 168: 135: 558: 536: 1066:
Significant figures arenā€™t perfect as a system, as you can see, but there is real reason to do this so itā€™s not just a technicality.ā€”
99: 1126: 104: 20: 385: 374: 332: 74: 934: 856: 202: 865:@ChessEric: yes because Europe has higher building standards. F3 damage in Germany could be EF4 to even EF5 damage in the US 129: 65: 580:. I'd be glad if someone managed to add them to the article, I can't really find any more energy to do it myself. Thanks -- 125: 524: 626:, and in the event of a disagreement over a rating, we go with the official source. Assessing the damage yourself is 1032:. An estimate based on damage alone, as is the case here, is unlikely to be precise to a part in a hundred or less.ā€” 24: 175: 109: 974:
Every online source for converting 380 kilometers per hour into miles per hour says it is 236.1 miles per hour.
562: 540: 995: 463: 208: 870: 689: 651: 605: 1050: 1003: 960: 554: 532: 55: 1089: 1070: 1036: 914: 882: 866: 685: 663: 647: 617: 601: 274:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
258: 141: 989:
to indicate the 236.1 mph since that is what 380 km/h accurately converts to. However, this change was
242: 221: 70: 903: 786: 749: 674: 635: 581: 190: 1025: 928: 850: 831: 585: 360: 161: 1080: 1061: 1046: 1015: 999: 956: 384:
and related subjects on Knowledge (XXG). To participate, help improve this article or visit the
550: 528: 51: 1086: 1067: 1033: 800: 764: 719: 703: 481: 1085:
Also, the ā€œconversion cycleā€ you speak of is finite: 380 km/h, 240 mph, 390 km/h, 240 mph.ā€”
1029: 918: 899: 782: 745: 670: 631: 518: 985:. No problems since it was a simple change that occurred in the new infobox switch. This 627: 623: 1092: 1073: 1054: 1039: 1007: 964: 938: 924: 907: 892: 874: 860: 846: 835: 827: 804: 790: 768: 753: 723: 707: 693: 678: 655: 639: 609: 589: 565: 543: 523:, I was writing this article at the same time as you and went and created a duplicate, 366: 271: 1105: 698:
The source material calls this an EF4, not an F4 tornado. I will begin making edits.
1021: 845:
Is there a reason why we are using the old chart format rather than the new one?
796: 775: 760: 734: 715: 699: 350: 326: 600:
its still officially rated as an F3 by the weather service there but we'll see
549:
I have merged bits of my article into this one, as this one was here first. ā€“
471: 356: 248: 824:
A fundraising campaign was launched by the delegation to aid those affected.
975: 380: 741: 978:. For 11 months (June 2022 to May 2023), this went unchanged ( 184: 15: 576:
Hey, I made some photos of the disaster aftermath yesterday (
462: 270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 990: 986: 982: 979: 160: 1142:
Unknown-importance Thunderstorm and tornado articles
174: 453:This article has not yet received a rating on the 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 795:Works for me. Thanks for taking care of that. 8: 981:) up until May 2, 2023 when the new infobox 578:commons:Category:2021 South Moravia tornado 321: 284:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Czech Republic 216: 1137:C-Class Thunderstorm and tornado articles 527:. We should merge one into the other. ā€“ 323: 218: 188: 1117:Mid-importance Czech Republic articles 953:published a joint damage survey report 7: 1122:All WikiProject Czech Republic pages 372:This article is within the scope of 264:This article is within the scope of 1147:WikiProject Severe weather articles 1132:Unknown-importance Weather articles 433:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Weather 287:Template:WikiProject Czech Republic 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 14: 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 923:That's what I meant. Thanks LGS. 474: 359: 349: 325: 251: 241: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1112:C-Class Czech Republic articles 947:2022 Joint Damage Survey report 304:This article has been rated as 1: 487:This article is supported by 278:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1152:WikiProject Weather articles 436:Template:WikiProject Weather 805:07:28, 21 August 2021 (UTC) 791:01:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC) 769:07:52, 20 August 2021 (UTC) 525:2021 South Moravian tornado 1168: 490:WikiProject Severe weather 455:project's importance scale 310:project's importance scale 267:WikiProject Czech Republic 25:2021 South Moravia tornado 965:18:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 939:00:12, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 908:00:07, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 875:22:32, 29 June 2021 (UTC) 861:20:43, 29 June 2021 (UTC) 836:09:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC) 754:21:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC) 724:08:45, 25 July 2021 (UTC) 708:08:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC) 694:01:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC) 679:00:55, 28 June 2021 (UTC) 656:20:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC) 640:19:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC) 622:A Facebook page is not a 610:11:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC) 590:02:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC) 566:08:52, 25 June 2021 (UTC) 544:08:35, 25 June 2021 (UTC) 470: 452: 344: 338:Thunderstorms / Tornadoes 303: 236: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1127:C-Class Weather articles 1093:03:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC) 1074:02:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC) 1055:02:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC) 1040:02:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC) 1008:21:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC) 630:, which is not allowed. 378:, which collaborates on 290:Czech Republic articles 467: 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 951:A few days ago, ESSL 466: 259:Czech Republic portal 201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 105:No original research 1026:significant figures 375:WikiProject Weather 970:236 mph vs 240 mph 468: 393:Articles Requested 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 628:original research 505: 504: 501: 500: 497: 496: 398:Project Resources 320: 319: 316: 315: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1159: 1084: 1065: 1019: 922: 896: 886: 779: 738: 667: 621: 522: 484: 482:Tornadoes portal 479: 478: 477: 441: 440: 439:Weather articles 437: 434: 431: 369: 364: 363: 353: 346: 345: 340: 329: 322: 292: 291: 288: 285: 282: 261: 256: 255: 254: 245: 238: 237: 232: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1167: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1102: 1101: 1078: 1059: 1030:false precision 1013: 972: 949: 912: 890: 880: 843: 821: 773: 732: 661: 624:reliable source 615: 597: 574: 516: 513: 480: 475: 473: 438: 435: 432: 429: 428: 427: 403:Become a Member 365: 358: 335: 289: 286: 283: 280: 279: 257: 252: 250: 230: 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1165: 1163: 1155: 1154: 1149: 1144: 1139: 1134: 1129: 1124: 1119: 1114: 1104: 1103: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1076: 971: 968: 948: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 888: 842: 839: 820: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 727: 726: 682: 681: 643: 642: 596: 595:Tornado rating 593: 573: 570: 569: 568: 512: 509: 507: 503: 502: 499: 498: 495: 494: 486: 485: 469: 459: 458: 451: 445: 444: 442: 426: 425: 420: 415: 410: 405: 400: 395: 389: 371: 370: 367:Weather portal 354: 342: 341: 330: 318: 317: 314: 313: 306:Mid-importance 302: 296: 295: 293: 281:Czech Republic 276:the discussion 272:Czech Republic 263: 262: 246: 234: 233: 231:Midā€‘importance 228:Czech Republic 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1164: 1153: 1150: 1148: 1145: 1143: 1140: 1138: 1135: 1133: 1130: 1128: 1125: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1107: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1082: 1081:Elijahandskip 1077: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1063: 1062:Elijahandskip 1058: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1047:Elijahandskip 1043: 1042: 1041: 1038: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1023: 1017: 1016:Elijahandskip 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1005: 1001: 1000:Elijahandskip 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 977: 969: 967: 966: 962: 958: 957:Elijahandskip 954: 946: 940: 936: 933: 930: 926: 920: 916: 915:Janis Schwemm 911: 910: 909: 905: 901: 894: 889: 884: 883:Janis Schwemm 879: 878: 877: 876: 872: 868: 867:Janis Schwemm 863: 862: 858: 855: 852: 848: 841:Tornado chart 840: 838: 837: 833: 829: 825: 818: 806: 802: 798: 794: 793: 792: 788: 784: 777: 772: 771: 770: 766: 762: 757: 756: 755: 751: 747: 743: 736: 731: 730: 729: 728: 725: 721: 717: 712: 711: 710: 709: 705: 701: 696: 695: 691: 687: 686:Janis Schwemm 680: 676: 672: 665: 664:Janis Schwemm 660: 659: 658: 657: 653: 649: 648:Janis Schwemm 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 619: 618:Janis Schwemm 614: 613: 612: 611: 607: 603: 602:Janis Schwemm 594: 592: 591: 587: 583: 579: 571: 567: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 547: 546: 545: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 520: 510: 508: 492: 491: 483: 472: 465: 461: 460: 456: 450: 447: 446: 443: 424: 421: 419: 416: 414: 411: 409: 406: 404: 401: 399: 396: 394: 391: 390: 388:for details. 387: 383: 382: 377: 376: 368: 362: 357: 355: 352: 348: 347: 343: 339: 334: 331: 328: 324: 311: 307: 301: 298: 297: 294: 277: 273: 269: 268: 260: 249: 247: 244: 240: 239: 235: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 987:was fix back 976:(KMH to MPH) 973: 950: 931: 864: 853: 844: 823: 822: 819:Unclear text 697: 683: 644: 598: 575: 551:filelakeshoe 529:filelakeshoe 514: 506: 488: 408:Project Talk 386:project page 379: 373: 305: 265: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1087:Jasper Deng 1068:Jasper Deng 1034:Jasper Deng 1022:MOS:CONVERT 991:revert back 572:Photographs 148:free images 31:not a forum 1106:Categories 919:TornadoLGS 900:TornadoLGS 783:TornadoLGS 746:TornadoLGS 671:TornadoLGS 632:TornadoLGS 519:Martin2035 413:Assessment 983:was added 925:ChessEric 893:ChessEric 847:ChessEric 828:A09090091 742:F4 rating 669:ratings. 582:T.Bednarz 511:June 2021 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 935:contribs 857:contribs 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 714:source. 430:Weather 418:A-Class 381:weather 333:Weather 308:on the 199:C-class 154:WPĀ refs 142:scholar 1090:(talk) 1071:(talk) 1037:(talk) 797:Dcs002 776:Dcs002 761:Dcs002 735:Dcs002 716:Dcs002 700:Dcs002 515:Sorry 423:Alerts 205:scale. 126:Google 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1051:talk 1028:and 1020:See 1004:talk 994:380. 961:talk 929:talk 917:and 904:talk 871:talk 851:talk 832:talk 801:talk 787:talk 765:talk 750:talk 720:talk 704:talk 690:talk 675:talk 652:talk 636:talk 606:talk 586:talk 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 449:??? 300:Mid 176:TWL 1108:: 1053:) 1006:) 963:) 937:) 906:) 873:) 859:) 834:) 803:) 789:) 767:) 752:) 744:. 722:) 706:) 692:) 677:) 654:) 638:) 608:) 588:) 563:šŸ± 561:) 557:/ 541:šŸ± 539:) 535:/ 336:: 156:) 54:; 1083:: 1079:@ 1064:: 1060:@ 1049:( 1018:: 1014:@ 1002:( 959:( 932:Ā· 927:( 921:: 913:@ 902:( 895:: 891:@ 885:: 881:@ 869:( 854:Ā· 849:( 830:( 799:( 785:( 778:: 774:@ 763:( 748:( 737:: 733:@ 718:( 702:( 688:( 673:( 666:: 662:@ 650:( 634:( 620:: 616:@ 604:( 584:( 559:c 555:t 553:( 537:c 533:t 531:( 521:: 517:@ 493:. 457:. 312:. 211:: 172:Ā· 166:Ā· 158:Ā· 151:Ā· 145:Ā· 139:Ā· 133:Ā· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
2021 South Moravia tornado
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WPĀ refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Czech Republic
WikiProject icon
Czech Republic portal

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘