Knowledge

Talk:CS gas

Source đź“ť

355: 536: 642: 624: 518: 2024:) says that "Army personnel repeat this training annually and immediately before military deployments." Should this be mentioned in the article? Finally, I apologize if I'm being morbid, but I'm curious. I know they're exposed to the CS, but do the troops have to breathe in the CS during the refresher courses, equipment maintenance exercises, annual refresher, and pre-deployment training, or is that just during the initial training? 546: 190: 486: 402: 346: 416: 388: 1255:
recommended to use a concentration of 200-400 mg of the agent per cubic meter for educational and testing purposes (carried out while wearing protective equipment and to illustrate to recruits the value and reliability of the equipment supplied to them). My question is: is this true for the actual CS levels or just a standard for the agent we used?
1583:
breathe at all. The only noticeable effect was a slight warming of the skin as though in sunlight. An instructing NCO informed me that in any given group of 50 or 60 trainees, there was usually one or two who displayed immunity. Obviously my personal experience and hearsay of that NCO is no reference, but I assume such could be found?
2618:
and linked that in "See also". I've gone through the "External links" and removed the dead items. Those actions clear all the issues raised above. The rest of the article is fully cited and honestly not too bad (not my cup of tea, but never mind). It covers "the main points", is quite readable (given
1670:
THe construction of the second quote seems to insinute that the US allows the use of CS gas in violation of international agreements, while the first quote shows this to be untrue. Additionally, no other section about national usage makes mention of that nation's status relative to the international
2576:
GA from 2006. The uses section has been tagged for needing additional citations since may 2021. listed with "Unsourced passages need footnotes ((citation needed)) (September 2011, March 2012, September 2013, November 2013, October 2019, June 2020), Failed verification (September 2013), Dead external
1931:
The references (currently 36 and 37) for the use of CS in British Armed Forces training do not support the statements in this article. The first deals exclusively with the use of CS in US military training in Ohio; the second reference does not specify whether recruits were required to remove their
828:
In response to the above, the information was deleted as it was inaccurate information with regard to what CS Spray was. The deleted information related to Tear Gas and not CS Spray (Gas) therefore meaning that it does not belong in this article. The remaining information is accurate and does relate
1978:
this article could benefit from the inclusion of the use of 87 CS projectiles in Hong Kong in Sept 28, 2014, by the police against unarmed and peaceful demonstrators demanding democratic elections. the CS gas cannisters and content used were purchased from CHEMRING, a british weapons manufacturer.
1582:
The article makes no mention of immunity to this substance. Some people are immune to the effects of CS, or suffer greatly reduced symptoms. In my own military training, I was able to breathe CS normally and function with open eyes in a gas hut full of the stuff, while other trainees were unable to
1051:
is a personal judgement call. When I put the info in, I was thinking along the lines of effects on the body of related chemical combinations. I thought some people may have been interested in the fact that Chlorobenzene and malonic acid are closely related to CS and are themselves pretty toxic. For
844:
There is no such thing as CS Gas! CS are solid crystals and do not turn into gas (the CS cannisters contain a propellant of spray to force the crystals out onto target areas). The gas cannisters used in Northern Ireland contained Tear Gas for crowd control which again means that it has no place for
788:
The article excludes Scotland for some reason, even though police forces there issue CS Spray. Why has it been left out? Also, the article mentions the term "CS gas" is a misnomer, but it is used elsewhere in the article in reference to CS Spray - should these be changed? Any objections, answers or
1848:
In the section about use in israel, it's mentioned that Jawaher Abu-Rahma was repoted to be killed by the gas. Doesn't this part belongs to the "toxicity" section? also - what is the relevance of mentioning her brother which was killed by the hit of the canister (and therefore is irrelevant to the
1605:
I saw basically the same thing. One guy was immune and showed no reaction. We had to test the leak rate of or equipment and after that the brave ones (stupid!) took of they gas masks and all but one had to leave due to severe reactions. The guy was running in the CS for 5 minutes and came out with
1403:
I agree that this part should be changed. The line that says "Saddam used CS...in his own country" has a blatant US politically centric tone. Governments all around the world use CS gas "in their own countries" all the time. It is commonly used by police worldwide. The entire section should be
832:
The article is CS Gas not CS Spray! On many ocassion canisters of CS gas where dispersed into crowds in Northern Ireland, this accurate and factual information was removed. This feels to me like POV pushing. Are you stating that the CS Gas article should not have historical and factual information
803:
I have edited this page to show accurately what CS Incapacitant Spray is. I am a Police Officer and what was originally wrote here is mostly a confusing combination between Tear gas and CS Spray which are two entirely different things, therefore the edited version seeks to re-dress this issue and
714:
Since I researched it and find no evidence of this at all, in fact several sites mention that you should remove and wash or discard them as the gas can build up behind them and cause irritation and blindness. But nowhere does it mention that they can fuse to the cornea. As a scientist, this seems
2355:
be merged here because it is, uh, a stub that doesn't seem to have any chances on its own. I mean, the two articles are on the same topic and it doesn't seem like either one is too long. I will leave this merger proposal alone for other editors to discuss; I'm probably too busy doing CV work and
1455:
Why do some countries have their own subjects and others not? In the US CS gas is used, but the country is very large and the usage is not so common comparatively. In Palestine CS gas is used at least every week, more likely a few times a week, in many places. Usage in israel is given a sentence
1666:
And under the section dealing with the US, this sentence appears: CS gas has been banned by international treaty in warfare since the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention, and the United States is a signatory to this treaty. However CS can and is used against its own citizens by local police forces
1343:
Marked claim of US use in Vietnam as citation needed, despite extensive research i have been unable to find a credible first hand source confirming this claim. As such i believe section should be at lest rewritten to reflect the dubious nature of this claim if not deleted entirely. sept 2013
2019:
The article says, "Members of the United States armed forces are exposed to CS during initial training, and during training refresher courses or equipment maintenance exercises..." I'm curious as to what "equipment maintenance exercises" means and how often it's done. I know that troops are
903:
Parneix-Spake et al reported cases of CS spray causing erythematous dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis with vesicles, keratitis, blisters and crusts, accompanied by pronounced oedema.7 Onset occurred 12 hours to three days after exposure. Varma and Holt report a case of severe contact
899:
CS causes a burning sensation in the eyes and is a potent lacrimator, but generally does not cause irreversible eye effects. Duration of aerosol induced irritation is usually 5–15 minutes after removal from exposure. Respiratory effects include coughing, bronchoconstriction, and change in the
2038:
Looking at the phrase "equipment maintenance exercises" again, I'm guessing it refers to things such as learning to use the hydration port, using decontamination wipes on the face and mask, etc. I'm still curious about the other things, though. I'm just trying to understand what I've read.
1254:
When I was in training as an NBC instructor in the Swedish armed forces (during 2003) we were told that a concentration of CS agent in the air of 1,2 mg per cubic meter was the limit of "human tolerance" (implying that a person will be unable to perform or resist at this level). We were also
882:
refers to CS, CN and CR as gases. No these are not gases in the classic sense - but it is how these compounds are known in common parlance. It is dissapointing that you chose to remove relevant information rather than give it a deserved place in the article. I assume you have heard of
911:
has been estimated at 25 000 to 150 000 mg/m3—that is, a dose many times greater than the exposure dose that produces intolerable symptoms in humans. No site decontamination other than ventilation is necessary after use of CS aerosol because CS dispersed in air quickly loses potency.
739:
Having been sprayed with a 3% CS spray myself, while wearing contact lenses, I can say this is not the case. It sounds like the sort of scare stories about non-lethal options like tasers and water cannons which get spread by people with bad intentions, and believed by the ignorant.
1307:
I changed this ("15 million pounds" to "seven and a half thousand tons") to make it more readable/understandable, but my edit was reverted because it supposedly added incorrect information. I guess I should have gone through the proper channels before submitting an edit...
1513:
Typically, the NYPD doesn't use CS gas because they have a much larger police force than most cities (allowing them to make arrests or use OC spray rather than CS), and because NYC's population density ensures that there would be many third parties affected by CS.
1697:
On the UK section, the last two paragraphs have been written and left uncited, apart from a footnote saying they come from the contributors personal experience. If the events in Essex are in fact reported in the "Illford Recorder", then why can they not be cited?
1887:
The last part of the second sentence makes no sense to me. How would CS "crystallize with the dichloromethane molecules as an aerosol"? I read the source and I feel I can offer a more clear explanation (not that it should matter much but I am a chemist).
1052:
example the article in the external link I added treats the irritants Cs, Cn, Cnc, Ca, Cr, Cnb, PS together. However if the article is to focus solely on CS then the info does not need to be there. I fixed the notes though which you'd not updated. Cheers
1745:
No citation, apart from "contributor's personal experience". I frankly call into question the honesty of someone attempting to silence a democratic political party, but more than that, "original research" (if it can be called that) isn't acceptable.
2385:. Clear content fork. Are there any useful data in the infobox at the data page that aren't already included in the infobox in the main article? I haven't checked, but if not, this should just be PRODed. If there is any useful information though, I 1189:
If you ask me, the article seems to be mostly about how CS has been used over time and all the situations its caused, is there anything more you can find on how exactly it was created and how their reaserch proceeded until it was in its compleated
1505:
for some years in NYC, I can confirm that the NYPD does not use CS gas. This isn't to say there isn't some stockpiled somewhere, but police officers will often say, "We don't use teargas," when asked about it. Since the NYPD is notable for its
985:
This chemical compound was first isolated in 1928 and is named for the men, Corson and Stoughton, who first developed its active ingredient. This ingredient, 2-chlorobenzalmalononitrile is mixed with other chemicals to turn it into a gas.
1288:
Officers are not sprayed with the same dosage. In Scotland for example, officers are sprayed with a 3% concentrate rather than 5 % and it is not the same as the spray they carry as it is in an aerosol version rather that a single spray.
1884:"In the Waco Siege, CS was dissolved in the organic solvent dichloromethane (also known as methylene chloride). When the volatile dichlormethane evaporated, the CS crystallized with the dichloromethane molecules as an aerosol." 1266:
I would dispute this. Each individual US police agency has its own purchasing mandate and officer use everything from CS in a 1% right the way through to a 10% solution, as well as OC (Pepper), PAVA, and hybrids (5%OC5%CS etc).
710:
Does anyone have a source for this statement : Furthermore, individuals who are exposed to CS Gas should not have contact lenses in their eyes, since exposure to the gas causes the lens to fuse to the cornea of the eye.
974:
Does anybody out there know how CS gas got the name CS? I always assumed it was short for the chemical name, but the article says the chemical name is chlorobenzylidene malonitrile... so what does "CS" actually mean?
873:. You do agree that "Tear Gas" exists, one form of which is CS tear gas. In many instances this has been shortened to CS gas. This article talk page is named CS gas - what does that tell you? I would ask you to go to 1470:
more American editors than any other nationality, so it's hardly surprising that US angles are covered more comprehensively than others. Add well-sourced Palestinian info and it will likely remain in the article.
2765: 682: 1076:
It is not a question of personal judgement - it is a question of chemistry. You will recognise that the "closely related" chemicals common salt, chlorine and sodium have rather different effetcs when ingested.
877:
for example and do a search for "CS gas". Yes there is a semantic issue here, but that is all the more reason to fully detail the natures of tear gas (CS based) and the spray form. The Knowledge article on
153: 688: 1891:
How about: "The solution was dispersed as an aerosol via explosive force and when the highly volatile dichloromethane evaporated, CS crystals precipitated and formed a fine dispersion in the air."
606: 2770: 2154: 2020:
supposed to check their equipment, such as protective masks, at least monthly, but does that mean that they do the chamber training every month? Also, an article in the External Links section (
1383:
Hi FireBadger, I've looked into a bit - at least at what's easily available online, you have a point in that it could be worded better. Iraq used CS against the Iranians as opposed to the Kurds
1303:
The estimate "15 million pounds" is entirely compatible with "thousands of tons" (1 thousand tons == 2 million pounds) but the writing here makes it sound like the two measurements are at odds.
907:
No deaths have been attributed to CS. However, Hu et al reported that inhalation of high concentration CS could result in chemical pneumonitis and fatal pulmonary oedema. However, the LD50 of
2760: 658: 576: 572: 1430:
for tips on keeping references formatted and looking clean. The external links section is also getting a little long, so you might want to consider pruning it a bit in accordance with
2725: 2750: 649: 629: 600: 1663:
Under the "Use" section, this sentece appears: Domestic police use of CS is legal in many countries, however, as the Chemical Weapons Convention prohibits only military use.
1456:
while the US is given a subject. I'm not trying to say that this should be reversed, just what is the criteria why some countries have large sections and others almost none?
928:
I have taken on your criticisms of the article and have completely re-written it - please have a look and add or change anything that you deem improves the article. Regards
568: 2265: 1621:
Anecdotal, but I confirm that the same happened to me. It actually saved our belongings (and maybe life) as (civilian variety) CS gas was used on me during robbery.
1489:
I am slightly concerned at it being called CS Gas as it isn't technically a gas. Police forces in the uk call it CS spray. Was wondering if this could be looked at?
2715: 888: 2730: 2293: 2289: 2275: 147: 2755: 2160:
Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
2479: 316: 2740: 558: 466: 359: 2745: 476: 79: 1263:"Notably the CS spray used by UK police has 5 times as much CS as the spray used by American police forces (5% dissolved CS and 1% CS respectively). " 2710: 2592:
Beside the issue of many unsourced paragraphs, I think the long and indiscriminate laundry list of incidents of usage is problematic with respect to
2720: 1742:. Victims were blinded for 5 minutes, but burning persisted for at least an hour. Mild nausuea and facial inflammation persists for several hours." 201: 1434:. The lead section could also use a little expansion, though it's sufficient, it could use more details on some of the uses and other aspects. See 2695: 2255: 1948: 1641: 1090: 1217:
I have read elsewhere in Knowledge land that using a rhetorical device as a category title is not good style. Perhaps this should be changed to
867:
If I am confused, it appears I am not alone, please see this note from Hansard, where the venerable Dr Reid refers to your non-existing CS gas:
2182: 2150: 1911:
Sounds reasonable to me. I've changed the text as you suggested and if someone feels it could be said better - let them go ahead and improve.
2700: 1753: 563: 523: 259: 85: 1426:, and will be kept. I made a few minor changes to the reference and formatting structure, adding some details. Editors might want to review 2735: 2109: 1986: 1590: 1521: 1103: 747: 2423: 1678: 1351: 1031:
as it is irrelevant. Chlorobenzene and malonic acid are different chemicals to CS gas. Carbon and nitrogen, don't forget, form a rather
993: 769: 729: 219: 2460: 2001: 960:
There are various "vomit" gases: Adamsite (DM), diphenylchloroarsine (DA) & Diphenylcyanoarsine (DC), to name but 3 I could find.
1644:
which attributes SK to "South Kensington" and HS to "Hun Stuff" - does anyone have more sources that clarify these designations? ----
978:
Also, is this verified? It's actually illegal to use CS in warfare, but still legal to use in crowd control? How's that for irony--
2615: 2372: 2271:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1510:
using CS gas in situations comparable to where other police forces have, I thought it was inappropriate to use them as the example.
2266:
http://www.childrenscommissioner.nt.gov.au/publications/Childrens%20Commissioner%20DDYDC%20-%20Report%20to%20Minister%20170915.pdf
2705: 2690: 1023:
as “a well known industrial poison which could cause damage to the brain, the liver and the kidneys”. Another of its components,
2068:, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section. 1709:, but all survived. The remaining students of the school were held in classrooms and halls, until it was confirmed by the local 2532: 500: 442: 431: 424: 393: 207: 99: 30: 1271:"The forces that do use the PIS in the UK require that police constables should themselves be sprayed with a 3% dissolved CS" 1184:
Good articles may not be as thorough and detailed as our featured articles, but should not omit any major facets of the topic.
1085:
CS gas is actually named after its two American inventors, B. Carson and R. Staughton who developed it in 1928. Cheers, Robert
1139:
Don't know anything about CS gas myself so I can't really say, but the references seem to be from pretty in-the-know sources.
654: 104: 44: 20: 2491:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1825:
Is that the real IUPAC name? Because malononitrle is not used and should be propanedinitrile, and there is a double bond.--
868: 2677:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
74: 1640:
It seems there are uncited claims on Knowledge about the origin of the military designations CS, HS, SK, etc. I've found
2645: 2565: 2528: 2336: 1502: 368: 1944: 1916: 65: 2654:
I've removed some uncited names from the infobox. AFAICT the hazard statements are acceptable in their current form.
168: 2435:
aims to clean up these data pages (upgrade or delete). This seems to interfere with this individual merge proposal (
2513: 956:
What is the actual name for the gas known as "vomit gas"? It's simmilar to tear gas, but causes nausea instead. //
135: 2105:. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) 1757: 1739: 2292:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
766: 2601: 2256:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130309021418/http://www.acpo.police.uk/documents/uniformed/2009/200905UNGIS01.pdf
1849:
subject. Personally, I read this as a cheap emotional writing, which is not supposed to be in an encyclopedia.
1594: 813:
That is all well and good but there was a lot of useful CS gas information that has been deleted by this user.
765:
It appears that most of the sources end up pointing back at a reported quote from a protester (end of article)
726:
Contact Lens Complications: Etiology, Pathogenesis, Prevention, Therapy By Hans-Walter Roth - ISBN: 1588901327
1990: 1901: 1525: 1203:
I dont believe this article is written from a neutral point of view. (See below). The tone is US/UK centric.
1099: 751: 2245: 1355: 1278:
It would be good to be able to add this to the article, can you provide references for this information? Ta.
997: 773: 733: 2659: 2641: 2628: 2561: 2505: 2417: 2327: 2237: 2098: 2094: 2083: 2005: 1682: 495: 109: 1806:
The Israel section has been reverted by another editor. I have reverted the Category:Chemical weapons tag.
2582: 2464: 2189: 1940: 1912: 1731: 937:
If you were able to get a photo of the spray - that would be an excellent addition to the article. Cheers
1897: 1095: 904:
dermatitis.10 Further case reports record delayed effects with various types of dermatitis and blisters.
2436: 2368: 2352: 2311:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2299: 2201: 2102: 1316: 1020: 374: 189: 129: 2259: 2236:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1077: 401: 2177:
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
1701:
OK, following the above, these entries have been deleted: "In 2005, a student from Mayfield School in
1457: 1312: 1233:
I changed that title. Feel free to change it to something better but I think we should avoid using a
1982: 1936: 1869: 1854: 1749: 1706: 1674: 1586: 1517: 1405: 1374: 1347: 1204: 1119:
A good article shares many characteristics with featured articles, and like featured content it must:
989: 743: 1792:
Why have the section on Israel and the Category Chemical weapons been removed, without explanation?
854: 2597: 2432: 1238: 1234: 1222: 161: 125: 55: 2040: 2025: 1174:
wherever possible, contain images to illustrate it. The images should all be appropriately tagged.
657:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2655: 2637: 2624: 2413: 2408:. Hello! Correct me if I'm wrong but it looks like the content is already in the main CS page. I 2394: 2153:
that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's
2137: 1568: 1553: 1442: 1332: 879: 437: 70: 2296:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1865: 1850: 871: 641: 623: 2312: 2123:. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. 874: 2578: 2090: 2044: 2029: 1649: 1373:
We know he gassed them...but it wasnt with CS. I believe that is wrong and should be removed.
535: 517: 211: 175: 51: 2614:
I wonder. The list was a mess, and inappropriate for a text article, so I've split it off as
1964:
This article hasn't been reviewed since 2007 and doesn't leap out as being of GA standard. --
2444: 2357: 2195: 1472: 1466:
Believe it or not, Knowledge isn't actually a US conspiracy. The English Knowledge attracts
1067: 1040: 2319: 2640:, before I close this, are all the details in the infobox cited somewhere in the article? 2178: 1828: 1719: 1626: 1611: 1423: 1195: 2000:
If it was a good article it would explain the mechanism action of CS gas, but it does't.
2021: 1035:
chemical when combined - compounds are very often very different to their constituents.
2593: 2278:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2217:
Last edited at 19:59, 15 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
1969: 1435: 1427: 1326:
Please see my comment on your IP address page. Nice to see you've registered. Welcome!
892: 2318:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1384: 2684: 2390: 2120: 2065: 1807: 1793: 1562: 1558: 1541: 1419: 1393: 1327: 1279: 1053: 1016: 961: 938: 929: 917: 834: 814: 141: 1735: 1714: 1645: 1549: 1498: 1431: 1311:
Should it change pounds to tons (second number), or tons to pounds (first number)?
1024: 957: 790: 485: 2440: 2285: 2116: 1779:
Contributor was blinded by CS Gas at said protest, hence description of symptoms
1404:
removed, unless every instance of CS use around the globe is going to be listed.
1290: 1063: 1036: 979: 884: 545: 2619:
the subject matter), and is appropriately illustrated. I think it's probably a
1717:
that the scene was safe. The event was reported only in a local newspaper, the
2284:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1622: 1607: 721: 551: 541: 1894:
Or something similar? I think that describes the situation more accurately.
767:
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/100_protesters_arrested_in_Denver_hit_0826.html
1965: 1832: 415: 387: 2577:
links ((dead link)) (November 2018), ... (May 2021)" on the bambots page.
2246:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070926011533/http://www.waco93.com/detcs.pdf
1274:
Again not true. Officers are sprayed with the same product as they carry.
653:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to 1390: 1032: 1552:. If you see a mistake, please revert, and leave a note on the bot's 2498: 2229: 1710: 1636:
Some answers about the origin of the designations for chemical agents
24: 2260:
http://www.acpo.police.uk/documents/uniformed/2009/200905UNGIS01.pdf
1001: 1671:
agreement in question. Why is the US singled out in this regard?
2459:
As above, it's not a gas, it's an aerosol, the facts matter peeps
2249: 1932:
masks (or any other part of their suits) for exposure to CS gas.
1702: 1880:
Nonsensical Statements on CS Gas Dispersion with Dichloromethane?
1705:, used CS gas inside the school. Several students were taken to 1727: 339: 15: 2082:
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic
1548:
to the WikiProject banners on this page, as it's listed as a
2663: 2649: 2632: 2605: 2586: 2569: 2468: 2448: 2398: 2376: 2341: 2209: 2112:, avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}) in headings. 2048: 2033: 2009: 1994: 1973: 1952: 1920: 1905: 1873: 1858: 1838: 1814: 1800: 1761: 1686: 1653: 1630: 1615: 1598: 1572: 1529: 1475: 1460: 1445: 1408: 1396: 1377: 1359: 1337: 1320: 1293: 1282: 1241: 1225: 1207: 1198: 1080: 1056: 964: 941: 932: 920: 857: 837: 817: 793: 777: 755: 484: 2086:, and might not be applicable for the article in question. 2766:
Unknown-importance Occupational Safety and Health articles
2240:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2136:
might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
1693:
Uncited anecdotes do not constitute encyclopaedic entries
1422:
sweeps review process. The article continues to meet the
441:. To participate, help improve this article or visit the 1730:
headquarters in West London during protests against the
2548: 2540: 2509: 2233: 2060: 309: 290: 271: 252: 1726:
In October 2009 CS Gas was used by police outside the
160: 2140:(if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please 2022:
http://www.readperiodicals.com/201110/2485901761.html
667:
Knowledge:WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health
2771:
WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health articles
2288:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1927:
References for British Armed Forces CS gas training
1388:"a biological agent, aflatoxin, was used in CS gas" 1169:
Nice inline citations and plenty of references here
853:
are two different things. Try not to get confused.(
670:
Template:WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health
278: 687:This article has not yet received a rating on the 605:This article has not yet received a rating on the 2761:GA-Class Occupational Safety and Health articles 435:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2064:, and are posted here for posterity. Following 1370:The line "Saddam used CS against the Kurds"... 2726:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Technology 2274:This message was posted before February 2018. 715:pretty damn unlikely too. More likely a myth. 217:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 2058:The comment(s) below were originally left at 1418:Re-reviewing this article in accordance with 174: 8: 1864:I took the liberty to correct these flaws. 833:about CS gas canister use in crowd control? 2751:Unknown-importance Law enforcement articles 722:http://www.actionmedics.org.uk/prepare.html 2070: 1980: 895:from the Medical Toxicology Unit, London: 650:WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health 618: 512: 382: 231: 184: 2228:I have just modified 3 external links on 891:will help. Finally I would quote from a 1772: 673:Occupational Safety and Health articles 620: 514: 384: 2716:Knowledge vital articles in Technology 2183:User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a 2731:GA-Class vital articles in Technology 1027:, has caused fatalities in industry. 585:Knowledge:WikiProject Law Enforcement 297: 7: 2756:WikiProject Law Enforcement articles 2487:The following discussion is closed. 2439:). Anyway cleanup is ontr its way. - 2110:Knowledge:Manual of Style (headings) 829:to CS Spray and therefore was kept. 647:This article is within the scope of 588:Template:WikiProject Law Enforcement 421:This article is within the scope of 345: 343: 2093:for this article. For example, see 718:Sources that refute this statement 373:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 2741:High-importance chemicals articles 2559:: Kept, issues fixed by splitting. 900:frequency and depth of breathing. 870:, and here, the guardian, no less 493:This article has been listed as a 14: 2746:GA-Class Law enforcement articles 2616:List of uses of CS gas by country 2232:. Please take a moment to review 2066:several discussions in past years 210:. If you can improve it further, 2711:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 2673:The discussion above is closed. 2351:I am proposing that the article 2166:pigs are pink, so we thought of 2119:in this article- please observe 1536:Automatic addition of "class=GA" 640: 622: 544: 534: 516: 414: 400: 386: 353: 344: 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2721:GA-Class level-5 vital articles 2549:Watch article reassessment page 2426:) 20:54, 13 November 2021 (EST) 2264:Corrected formatting/usage for 2250:http://www.waco93.com/detcs.pdf 2188:You may wish to browse through 2115:There are a few occurrences of 1386:. However it is reported that: 471:This article has been rated as 451:Knowledge:WikiProject Chemicals 2696:Natural sciences good articles 1446:19:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 1111:Good Article stamp of approval 1047:Fair enough I guess, although 664:Occupational Safety and Health 655:occupational safety and health 630:Occupational Safety and Health 454:Template:WikiProject Chemicals 202:Natural sciences good articles 198:has been listed as one of the 1: 1974:16:05, 17 November 2013 (UTC) 1573:05:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 1530:18:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1360:08:19, 6 September 2013 (UTC) 1294:17:32, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 965:14:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC) 942:19:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 933:18:38, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 921:18:38, 16 February 2006 (UTC) 858:17:44, 16 February 2006 (UTC) 838:17:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC) 818:15:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC) 661:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2701:Old requests for peer review 2210:19:59, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 2049:21:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC) 2034:14:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC) 1995:22:22, 6 November 2014 (UTC) 1874:20:41, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 1859:20:24, 20 January 2011 (UTC) 1654:20:59, 24 January 2010 (UTC) 1503:Emergency Medical Technician 1476:22:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 1461:22:20, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 2736:GA-Class chemicals articles 2449:16:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC) 2192:for further ideas. Thanks, 2089:There may be an applicable 1839:10:26, 24 August 2010 (UTC) 1815:08:09, 10 August 2010 (UTC) 1762:17:13, 18 August 2010 (UTC) 1631:11:47, 21 August 2017 (UTC) 1599:09:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC) 1144:use a neutral point of view 1043:13:40, July 29, 2005 (UTC) 1002:08:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 564:WikiProject Law Enforcement 557:This article is within the 445:for details on the project. 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2787: 2469:21:24, 23 March 2022 (UTC) 2455:IT IS NOT A GAS, CHANGE IT 2305:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2225:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1801:19:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 1687:21:58, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 1420:WikiProject Good Articles' 1397:11:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 1378:20:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC) 1338:16:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 1321:13:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 1283:12:55, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 1242:16:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC) 1226:19:22, 19 April 2006 (UTC) 1199:17:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC) 1116:What makes a good article? 1070:10:11, July 31, 2005 (UTC) 982:06:06, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC) 689:project's importance scale 477:project's importance scale 2664:06:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC) 2650:00:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC) 2570:11:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC) 2377:20:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC) 2342:19:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC) 2172:ways to turn them green.” 2081: 1953:04:57, 19 July 2011 (UTC) 1740:Question Time (TV series) 1616:15:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC) 1493:Removed reference to NYPD 1057:14:33, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 970:How did it get it's name? 756:15:07, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 686: 635: 604: 529: 492: 470: 409: 381: 326: 317:Good article reassessment 298:Good article reassessment 234: 230: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2675:Please do not modify it. 2633:15:32, 6 June 2023 (UTC) 2606:01:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC) 2587:01:07, 28 May 2023 (UTC) 2489:Please do not modify it. 2399:07:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 2010:21:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC) 1921:07:12, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 1906:07:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC) 1409:21:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 1208:21:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC) 794:20:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 778:18:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC) 591:Law enforcement articles 429:, a daughter project of 2706:GA-Class vital articles 2691:Knowledge good articles 2221:External links modified 2099:Template:Infobox School 2095:Template:Infobox Person 1081:22:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC) 789:comments, let me know. 2552:• GAN review not found 2190:User:AndyZ/Suggestions 1734:and the appearance of 1732:British National Party 914: 799:Correct Version Edited 489: 75:avoid personal attacks 2642:~~ AirshipJungleman29 2562:~~ AirshipJungleman29 2356:eleminating stubs. -- 2179:Knowledge's best work 2103:Template:Infobox City 2015:Clarification, please 1844:Relevance of details? 1667:without restriction. 1659:Why is this included? 1134:be factually accurate 969: 897: 501:good article criteria 488: 432:WikiProject Chemistry 425:WikiProject Chemicals 360:level-5 vital article 208:good article criteria 100:Neutral point of view 2286:regular verification 2155:redundancy exercises 2061:Talk:CS gas/Comments 1250:Dosage and tolerance 1093:comment was added by 784:England & Wales? 279:Good article nominee 105:No original research 2276:After February 2018 1497:Having worked as a 1235:rhetorical question 1019:, was described by 880:Riot control agents 804:correct the myth. 2490: 2437:CS gas (data page) 2353:CS gas (data page) 2330:InternetArchiveBot 2281:InternetArchiveBot 2084:javascript program 2054:Assessment comment 1606:the rest of us. -- 1485:The name of CS Gas 1159:I see no conflicts 1021:Dr Raymond McClean 1008:Irrelevant section 490: 457:chemicals articles 369:content assessment 291:September 23, 2007 235:Article milestones 86:dispute resolution 47: 2488: 2306: 2215: 2214: 1997: 1985:comment added by 1956: 1941:Miracleworker5263 1939:comment added by 1913:Materialscientist 1752:comment added by 1677:comment added by 1601: 1589:comment added by 1532: 1520:comment added by 1350:comment added by 1330: 1107: 992:comment added by 746:comment added by 703: 702: 699: 698: 695: 694: 617: 616: 613: 612: 511: 510: 507: 506: 338: 337: 334: 333: 253:February 26, 2006 226: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2778: 2560: 2551: 2545: 2536: 2517: 2340: 2331: 2304: 2303: 2282: 2208: 2171: 2165: 2077:Press to view → 2071: 2063: 1955: 1933: 1810: 1796: 1780: 1777: 1764: 1689: 1584: 1515: 1473:Chris Cunningham 1414:GA sweeps review 1362: 1335: 1328: 1086: 1004: 758: 675: 674: 671: 668: 665: 644: 637: 636: 626: 619: 607:importance scale 593: 592: 589: 586: 583: 554: 549: 548: 538: 531: 530: 520: 513: 459: 458: 455: 452: 449: 418: 411: 410: 405: 404: 403: 398: 390: 383: 366: 357: 356: 349: 348: 347: 340: 327:Current status: 312: 293: 274: 255: 232: 215: 192: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2786: 2785: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2555: 2547: 2526: 2503: 2497: 2493: 2483: 2476: 2474:GA Reassessment 2457: 2366: 2349: 2347:Merger proposal 2334: 2329: 2297: 2290:have permission 2280: 2238:this simple FaQ 2223: 2193: 2167: 2161: 2059: 2056: 2017: 1962: 1934: 1929: 1882: 1846: 1823: 1808: 1794: 1790: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1778: 1774: 1754:158.143.146.103 1747: 1720:Ilford Recorder 1695: 1672: 1661: 1638: 1580: 1561: 1538: 1495: 1487: 1453: 1416: 1368: 1345: 1333: 1301: 1299:Vietnam Section 1261: 1252: 1215: 1124:be well written 1113: 1010: 987: 972: 954: 887:, perhaps this 845:this article - 801: 786: 741: 708: 672: 669: 666: 663: 662: 590: 587: 584: 582:Law Enforcement 581: 580: 550: 543: 524:Law Enforcement 473:High-importance 456: 453: 450: 447: 446: 399: 397:High‑importance 396: 367:on Knowledge's 364: 354: 308: 289: 270: 251: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2784: 2782: 2774: 2773: 2768: 2763: 2758: 2753: 2748: 2743: 2738: 2733: 2728: 2723: 2718: 2713: 2708: 2703: 2698: 2693: 2683: 2682: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2652: 2609: 2608: 2598:David Eppstein 2574: 2573: 2572: 2553: 2494: 2485: 2484: 2482: 2477: 2475: 2472: 2456: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2428: 2427: 2402: 2401: 2364: 2348: 2345: 2324: 2323: 2316: 2269: 2268: 2262: 2254:Added archive 2252: 2244:Added archive 2222: 2219: 2213: 2212: 2187: 2186: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144:this comment). 2134: 2129: 2113: 2106: 2079: 2078: 2075: 2055: 2052: 2016: 2013: 1987:122.61.242.190 1961: 1958: 1928: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1898:JohnnyTopQuark 1881: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1845: 1842: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1789: 1786: 1782: 1781: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1694: 1691: 1660: 1657: 1637: 1634: 1619: 1618: 1591:212.188.147.34 1579: 1576: 1557: 1547: 1537: 1534: 1522:207.152.153.66 1494: 1491: 1486: 1483: 1481: 1479: 1478: 1452: 1449: 1415: 1412: 1402: 1400: 1399: 1367: 1364: 1341: 1340: 1306: 1300: 1297: 1286: 1285: 1270: 1260: 1257: 1251: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1239:Mr Christopher 1223:Mr Christopher 1214: 1211: 1186: 1185: 1176: 1175: 1166: 1165: 1156: 1155: 1146: 1145: 1136: 1135: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1117: 1112: 1109: 1096:64.231.223.181 1089:The preceding 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1009: 1006: 971: 968: 953: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 916:Kind regards. 909:inhaled CS gas 889:google search 866: 864: 863: 862: 861: 842: 841: 840: 823: 822: 821: 820: 800: 797: 785: 782: 781: 780: 761: 748:158.143.146.90 707: 706:Contact Lenses 704: 701: 700: 697: 696: 693: 692: 685: 679: 678: 676: 659:the discussion 645: 633: 632: 627: 615: 614: 611: 610: 603: 597: 596: 594: 556: 555: 539: 527: 526: 521: 509: 508: 505: 504: 491: 481: 480: 469: 463: 462: 460: 419: 407: 406: 391: 379: 378: 372: 350: 336: 335: 332: 331: 324: 323: 320: 313: 305: 304: 301: 294: 286: 285: 282: 275: 272:March 12, 2006 267: 266: 263: 256: 248: 247: 244: 241: 237: 236: 228: 227: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2783: 2772: 2769: 2767: 2764: 2762: 2759: 2757: 2754: 2752: 2749: 2747: 2744: 2742: 2739: 2737: 2734: 2732: 2729: 2727: 2724: 2722: 2719: 2717: 2714: 2712: 2709: 2707: 2704: 2702: 2699: 2697: 2694: 2692: 2689: 2688: 2686: 2676: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2656:Chiswick Chap 2653: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2638:Chiswick Chap 2636: 2635: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2625:Chiswick Chap 2622: 2617: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2558: 2554: 2550: 2544: 2543: 2539: 2534: 2530: 2525: 2524: 2520: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2502: 2501: 2496: 2495: 2492: 2481: 2478: 2473: 2471: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2454: 2450: 2446: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2429: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2415: 2414:The 28th Duck 2411: 2407: 2404: 2403: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2362: 2360: 2354: 2346: 2344: 2343: 2338: 2333: 2332: 2321: 2317: 2314: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2301: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2277: 2272: 2267: 2263: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2226: 2220: 2218: 2211: 2207: 2205: 2204: 2199: 2198: 2196:Wim van Dorst 2191: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2170: 2164: 2159: 2158: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2133: 2130: 2128: 2125: 2124: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2111: 2107: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087: 2085: 2080: 2076: 2073: 2072: 2069: 2067: 2062: 2053: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2036: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2014: 2012: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1998: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1976: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1960:Good article? 1959: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1892: 1889: 1885: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1843: 1841: 1840: 1837: 1836: 1834: 1830: 1820: 1816: 1813: 1811: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1799: 1797: 1787: 1776: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1743: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1724: 1722: 1721: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1699: 1692: 1690: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1679:66.109.49.200 1676: 1668: 1664: 1658: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1635: 1633: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1577: 1575: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1560: 1555: 1551: 1545: 1543: 1535: 1533: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1511: 1509: 1504: 1500: 1492: 1490: 1484: 1482: 1477: 1474: 1469: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1459: 1450: 1448: 1447: 1444: 1439: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1413: 1411: 1410: 1407: 1398: 1395: 1391: 1389: 1385: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1376: 1371: 1365: 1363: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1352:71.208.196.50 1349: 1339: 1336: 1331: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1309: 1304: 1298: 1296: 1295: 1292: 1284: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1258: 1256: 1249: 1243: 1240: 1237:as a title. 1236: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1220: 1212: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1201: 1200: 1197: 1192: 1191: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1164:be referenced 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1083: 1082: 1079: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1029: 1028: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1017:Chlorobenzene 1013: 1007: 1005: 1003: 999: 995: 994:67.11.162.250 991: 983: 981: 976: 967: 966: 963: 959: 951: 943: 940: 936: 935: 934: 931: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 919: 913: 910: 905: 901: 896: 894: 890: 886: 881: 876: 875:this web page 872: 869: 859: 856: 852: 848: 843: 839: 836: 831: 830: 827: 826: 825: 824: 819: 816: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807:Best wishes! 805: 798: 796: 795: 792: 783: 779: 775: 771: 770:86.169.63.204 768: 764: 763: 762: 759: 757: 753: 749: 745: 737: 735: 731: 730:62.31.122.158 727: 724: 723: 719: 716: 712: 705: 690: 684: 681: 680: 677: 660: 656: 652: 651: 646: 643: 639: 638: 634: 631: 628: 625: 621: 608: 602: 599: 598: 595: 578: 574: 570: 566: 565: 560: 553: 547: 542: 540: 537: 533: 532: 528: 525: 522: 519: 515: 502: 498: 497: 487: 483: 482: 478: 474: 468: 465: 464: 461: 444: 440: 439: 434: 433: 428: 427: 426: 420: 417: 413: 412: 408: 395: 392: 389: 385: 380: 376: 370: 362: 361: 351: 342: 341: 330: 325: 321: 319: 318: 314: 311: 310:June 10, 2023 307: 306: 302: 300: 299: 295: 292: 288: 287: 283: 281: 280: 276: 273: 269: 268: 264: 262: 261: 257: 254: 250: 249: 245: 242: 239: 238: 233: 229: 224: 222: 221: 213: 209: 205: 204: 203: 197: 194: 191: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2674: 2620: 2579:Onegreatjoke 2575: 2556: 2541: 2537: 2523:Article talk 2522: 2521: 2518: 2499: 2486: 2461:92.19.193.42 2458: 2433:WP:DPCLEANUP 2420: 2409: 2405: 2386: 2382: 2358: 2350: 2328: 2325: 2300:source check 2279: 2273: 2270: 2227: 2224: 2216: 2202: 2197: 2194: 2168: 2162: 2151:redundancies 2141: 2131: 2126: 2117:weasel words 2057: 2037: 2018: 2002:82.55.73.243 1999: 1981:— Preceding 1977: 1963: 1935:— Preceding 1930: 1896: 1893: 1890: 1886: 1883: 1847: 1827: 1826: 1824: 1812: 1809:Vernon White 1798: 1795:Vernon White 1791: 1775: 1767: 1744: 1736:Nick Griffin 1725: 1718: 1715:firefighters 1700: 1696: 1669: 1665: 1662: 1639: 1620: 1581: 1563: 1550:good article 1539: 1512: 1507: 1499:street medic 1496: 1488: 1480: 1467: 1454: 1440: 1417: 1401: 1392:in Halabja. 1387: 1372: 1369: 1346:— Preceding 1342: 1310: 1305: 1302: 1287: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1262: 1253: 1218: 1216: 1202: 1193: 1188: 1187: 1178: 1177: 1168: 1167: 1158: 1157: 1148: 1147: 1138: 1137: 1128: 1127: 1088: 1084: 1078:81.170.62.51 1075: 1048: 1030: 1025:malonic acid 1015: 1014: 1011: 988:— Preceding 984: 977: 973: 955: 915: 908: 906: 902: 898: 865: 850: 846: 806: 802: 787: 760: 738: 728: 725: 720: 717: 713: 709: 648: 562: 496:good article 494: 472: 443:project page 436: 430: 423: 422: 375:WikiProjects 358: 329:Good article 328: 315: 296: 277: 258: 218: 216: 212:please do so 200: 199: 195: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2510:visual edit 2412:the merge. 2389:the merge. 2181:. See also 2169:a number of 2127:it has been 1748:—Preceding 1673:—Preceding 1642:this source 1585:—Preceding 1516:—Preceding 1458:213.6.5.208 1424:GA criteria 1313:Balrogthane 1291:User:Duffit 1259:UK / US Use 1213:Non-lethal? 1179:Looks good 1012:I removed: 885:Porton Down 742:—Preceding 260:Peer review 148:free images 31:not a forum 2685:Categories 2337:Report bug 2149:Watch for 2132:apparently 2074:Comment(s) 1829:Mikespedia 1821:IUPAC name 1768:References 1556:. Thanks, 1544:has added 1406:SuperFluid 1375:FireBadger 1205:SuperFluid 1196:Homestarmy 1049:irrelevant 552:Law portal 499:under the 206:under the 2431:Temporal 2320:this tool 2313:this tool 2138:citations 1833:Knowledge 1554:talk page 1154:be stable 952:Question? 855:Darktrial 567:. Please 448:Chemicals 438:chemicals 394:Chemicals 363:is rated 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 2596:#3(b). — 2424:contribs 2391:Mdewman6 2373:contribs 2326:Cheers.— 1983:unsigned 1949:contribs 1937:unsigned 1750:unsigned 1675:unsigned 1587:unsigned 1578:Immunity 1564:Giggabot 1546:class=GA 1518:unsigned 1451:criteria 1443:Dr. Cash 1441:Cheers! 1394:SeanMack 1348:unsigned 1280:SeanMack 1219:Toxicity 1104:contribs 1091:unsigned 1062:Thanks. 1054:SeanMack 990:unsigned 962:SeanMack 939:SeanMack 930:SeanMack 918:SeanMack 851:CS Spray 847:Tear Gas 835:SeanMack 815:SeanMack 744:unsigned 365:GA-class 265:Reviewed 220:reassess 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2594:WP:GACR 2533:history 2514:history 2500:Article 2410:support 2406:Comment 2387:support 2383:Comment 2359:littleb 2234:my edit 2091:infobox 2041:Evernut 2026:Evernut 1707:A&E 1646:IsaacAA 1436:WP:LEAD 1428:WP:CITE 958:Liftarn 561:of the 475:on the 243:Process 154:WP refs 142:scholar 2557:Result 2480:CS gas 2441:DePiep 2230:CS gas 2142:strike 2121:WP:AWT 1831:is on 1711:police 1468:vastly 1064:Dan100 1037:Dan100 980:Pariah 893:report 577:Assess 575:, and 573:Create 371:scale. 284:Listed 246:Result 196:CS gas 126:Google 25:CS gas 2542:Watch 2101:, or 1866:Wamit 1851:Wamit 1703:Essex 1623:Zezen 1608:Stone 1432:WP:EL 1366:Iraq? 1194:Yay! 1190:form? 1068:Talk) 1041:Talk) 1033:nasty 559:scope 352:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2660:talk 2646:talk 2629:talk 2621:Keep 2602:talk 2583:talk 2566:talk 2529:edit 2506:edit 2465:talk 2445:talk 2418:talk 2395:talk 2369:talk 2361:2009 2203:Talk 2108:Per 2045:talk 2030:talk 2006:talk 1991:talk 1970:talk 1966:John 1945:talk 1917:talk 1902:talk 1870:talk 1855:talk 1788:Why? 1758:talk 1713:and 1683:talk 1650:talk 1627:talk 1612:talk 1595:talk 1569:talk 1526:talk 1501:and 1356:talk 1334:MARK 1329:TINY 1317:talk 1100:talk 998:talk 849:and 774:talk 752:talk 734:talk 569:Join 467:High 322:Kept 303:Kept 240:Date 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2367:) ( 2365:her 2294:RfC 2258:to 2248:to 2163:All 2157:.) 1738:on 1728:BBC 1559:BOT 1542:bot 1508:not 1149:yes 1129:yes 1106:) . 791:Ben 683:??? 601:??? 176:TWL 2687:: 2662:) 2648:) 2631:) 2623:. 2604:) 2585:) 2568:) 2546:• 2531:| 2512:| 2508:| 2467:) 2447:) 2397:) 2375:) 2371:• 2363:(/ 2307:. 2302:}} 2298:{{ 2097:, 2047:) 2032:) 2008:) 1993:) 1972:) 1951:) 1947:• 1919:) 1904:) 1872:) 1857:) 1760:) 1723:. 1685:) 1652:) 1629:) 1614:) 1597:) 1571:) 1540:A 1528:) 1438:. 1358:) 1319:) 1221:? 1102:• 1059:. 1000:) 776:) 754:) 736:) 571:, 223:it 214:. 156:) 54:; 2658:( 2644:( 2627:( 2600:( 2581:( 2564:( 2538:· 2535:) 2527:( 2519:· 2516:) 2504:( 2463:( 2443:( 2421:· 2416:( 2393:( 2339:) 2335:( 2322:. 2315:. 2206:) 2200:( 2185:. 2043:( 2028:( 2004:( 1989:( 1968:( 1943:( 1915:( 1900:( 1868:( 1853:( 1835:! 1756:( 1681:( 1648:( 1625:( 1610:( 1593:( 1567:( 1524:( 1354:( 1315:( 1098:( 1087:— 1066:( 1039:( 996:( 860:) 772:( 750:( 732:( 691:. 609:. 579:. 503:. 479:. 377:: 225:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
CS gas
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Good article
Natural sciences good articles
good article criteria
please do so
reassess
February 26, 2006
Peer review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑