31:
1662:, without any independent sources; the only source cited is Palaver's own website. A quick google found no independent sources; it looks like the author of this client is trying to use Knowledge (XXG) to promote it. I think it should be removed from the list (and frankly its article wouldn't survive Prod let alone AfD), but I'll give the creator time to find some sources first.
484:
nothing, just to fight inclusion of this one verifiable, multiple RS client? I don't understand your goal here. There are other, much, much worse sourced, or unsourced battles to fight, more likely to lead to a win for you. To go forward, shall I call in 3O, or EA? I never object to calling in uninvolved, disinterested third parties. --
277:, and yes, I'm going to insist that complete, correct language be used. We've agreed here that (well fleshed-out) primary sources are reliable, but not sufficient by themselves for inclusion here. The other source, Softonic, already passed RSN (as noted in prior discussions), and MIRC.net is a fine news/review source
1053:. It's a drag that the site's not around, but worse that it seems, at least according to the Internet Archive to have only been around for a short time, though that appearance doesn't necessarily mean anything. I followed the Facebook link, then got the IRCresource ThrashIRC review page via the archive:
951:
Developers create PAD files that describe their products which are polled by software distribution sites, that is why you see the author's claims duplicated on those sites. I sympathize with the contributors of this article, it must be a discerning task to separate home-grown from notable clients. I
1313:
source (such as the author) is not enough. Clients which do not already have their own articles need two "decent" independent reliable reviews or discussions, or one "excellent" comprehensive one, describing the client, for inclusion. It's not just me saying this: we've arrived at these criteria
847:
I looked through every review linked on the awards page. They are all quotes of the author's claims about the software, with no reviewer name shown, so they don't help. Don't worry, these things take time. Eventually it will be actually reviewed by CNET, or perhaps
Softonic. For more about what we
590:
And yet Neebly manages to leave it's own mark on the IRC world as a modern looking, easy to use, freeware IRC client for
Windows. Neebly is very much a work in progress - new releases are made every 1 or 2 months and it's surrounded by a community of developers who are constantly improving it. It
594:
What characterizes Neebly is its use of Ribbon menus which gives Neebly a simplified, elegant look no matter now many conversations you have open. It doesn't have all the graphical touches of something like MSN Live
Messenger and the stripped down look and server channels give Neebly the look of
516:
The "list dispute" tag is no longer relevant. The "dispute" has been settled for nearly a year, that reliable sources are required for clients without articles. 1 very good reliable source or 2 passable ones, plus a well-descriptive primary source, has become the defacto standard. There is no
483:
review, which includes negative comments. Dr. Dobb's' editorial supervision, makes that particular primary source rather strong. I never claimed the primary sources as independent, just multiple primary, with different publication dates and multiple publication media. Are you really conceding
1382:
Discussion is somewhat difficult to find, as although it is one of the most popular IRC client by user count (at least on QuakeNet, where it is only second to mIRC), qwebirc is generally only deployed by a few IRC network administrators, and is then integrated into their own website (ala
569:
I was paraphrasing, without intention to dilute or alter the (verbose) general inclusion criteria discussion. Here are the full texts of the reviews: the
Softonic review is more than two paragraphs. Is it possible you didn't click "read more" (an annoying misfeature of the website)?:
858:"Here are five of the things I've learned while editing Knowledge (XXG) and this article in particular: 1) sources can appear in surprising places, 2) they can take a frustratingly long time to appear, 3) sources can become reliable after deep research and discussion (example, see
312:
a review in a download website.... mass-made by an editor who has also made reviews of "Grand Theft Auto IV Series
Wallpaper (BB) (Liberty city in your Blackberry)" and "Tema Apple Leopard Today para BlackBerry (Pretend that you have a Mac un your BlackBerry)"
436:
Articles written by the author about their own programs are not third party. Neither are reviews by acquitances of the author on their own website. Softtonic mass-reviews random programs, with unknown editorial control, which should make it not reliable.
1421:
Nice start - I'll look 'em over. IRCJunkie is the most usable of the lot, but use cases are good, if they write about their experience. Mibbit being dropped? Sounds serious. Some major general tech news outlet or blog should be covering it soon.
1218:
This comparison list of IRC clients seems to only require "verifiability" of a client to be included. I want to point out that irc-junkies.org is authoritative on the subject of IRC clients and includes ThrashIRC in their list of clients.
1097:
This comparison list of IRC clients seems to only require "verifiability" of a client to be included. I want to point out that irc-junkies.org is authoritative on the subject of IRC clients and includes ThrashIRC in their list of clients.
2020:
The last stable release, while readable, is not sortable by short month, day, year. Moving to year, month, day does not fix the problem unless you use a numeric month, but this is not universally readable. Any suggestions?
649:
Neebly automatically recognizes URLs and gives them browser-like behavior. When typing in a channel's textbox, by pressing tab the auto-completion popup will appear and show all nicknames that start with the typed keyword.
2033:
This depends on the JavaScript for table sorting, hence
Wikimedia folks. They may have this on their buglist schedule already. I recommend asking politely for status update on irc wikimedia support channel. Best of luck!
653:
The idle time of any user is always available in the /whois information. If you accidentally paste multiple lines in Neebly's textbox, it grows and shows everything that has been pasted before sending it to the servers.
1140:. I moved the above comment to this section from the Adium client section, because it was about ThrashIRC. I wonder about celebs or inventors that Knowledge (XXG) has pages on, do they try to edit their own pages much?
1066:
The review is kind of short, but perhaps IRCresource, its staff, and the author "Solitary_scar" can be deemed reliable based on expertise and/or by being cited by other reliable sources. I'll look into it later.
1028:. I was asked if I knew of signed reviews, the only one I know of was on ircresource.info and the site no longer exists. But, they still have Twitter and Facebook pages. You can see the tweet of the review
886:
It will take time, and money. Every site considered to be a good reviewer, also charges for such a wonderful privilege. I don't think we should have to pay CNET just to be listed inside
Knowledge (XXG).
1675:
I agree. Thanks for bringing it up, I didn't notice it. Feel free to wait, or to delete at once. Notability cannot be established at this time. I wrote to the article creator that the article should be
1995:
Hello. I can't find any information about a client named rIRC, this project may be dead. However, I have found another project with the same name and a different capitalisation ; rirc, at this address
1698:! Best new editor responsiveness I've ever seen - agreed to delete mainspace & work on userspace, skipping the whole AfD unpleasantness. Let's encourage this one to stick around and edit stuff. --
1608:
The article says that the clients in the purple background aren't in development any longer. However, none of them are listed as purple / out of development. Can someone take a swing at fixing this?
598:
You can open different chats with different contacts in tabs although this is nothing new - Adium has offered this for a long time although it's a useful way of keeping track of your conversations.
1506:
FreeDOS 1.1 comes with two IRC clients but only one is listed. IRC Junkies recently reviewed IRCjr so it appears to have references. Is there a reason why it is missing from the article ?
967:
I saw ad and promo packages, but no language that requires payment for editorial reviews. Since such information might be behind multiple pay- or login- walls, screenshots uploaded to, say,
475:
RSN already passed
Softonic, and the the Softonic website clearly delineates editorial staffing - upon what policy basis or consensus are you disputing that? As for the MIRC review, having
945:
Cnet's download site is upload.com, and they have different packages for developers. Basic listing is free, but they charge for search placement, clicks, promotional and editorial reviews.
1838:
422:
1582:
I'm not quite sure what is going on, but it looks like the references are getting out of sync at the point where the latest release references start. We need help debugging this.
601:
Neebly is an original and flexible IRC client that's not really going to compete with the big boys but is great for developers or those that need to create their own chat channel.
1330:(Content which is not supported by independent reliable sources can be deleted at any time. Other editors watching this list do delete on sight, so I suggest getting a move on.)
1561:
which should include the host operating system and possibly desktop environment, if any. The CPU architecture is probably not a terribly useful differentiator for IRC clients.
374:
The book and Dobbs article mention jIRCii nontrivially, and count as usable primary source. And the Dobbs is editorially reviewed, and so cannot be dismissed as purely primary.
1056:
1009:
to hang inclusion on, and I'm an inclusionist. It does help, however, and when thrashirc is covered more widely in substantive reviews, this will be cited. Patience. --
2142:
2138:
2124:
517:
reason to continue screaming about any of this. It's just over. This article deserves to be unburdened of the bitter infighting practiced by an intransigent few. --
479:
known someone as an acquaintance does not automatically disqualify them as a reliable review source, and I don't know what policy basis you're claiming so; especially
1122:
The existence of a laundry list does not necessitate that we repeat it. That is why reviews should be substantive and explain why a specific client merits inclusion.
591:
should also be noted that it's not for beginners - it's a million miles away from
Microsoft Live Messenger and aimed more towards developers than general users.
1290:
I've boldly added what I believe to be the general consensus about verifiability (not notability) of clients added which lack articles, just above the TOC. --
920:
Can you provide a link to support that claim, please? That would be very helpful info for us to have, when determining a site's reliability. From what I see
543:. I think that this doesn't qualify as "1 very good reliable source". This looks looks like a superficial half-baked review, doesn't even reach "passable".
595:
something closer to eMule than an IRC client. As a result, it's a chat client which the tech savvy will appreciate, but beginners may be intimidated by.
2046:
2100:
1845:. Near the top of this there is a search box for the talk archives. You can search the name of the clients and see if they were discussed before. --
72:
67:
59:
695:
You are right, I didn't click in "read more". Ugh, my bad. This should qualify as two passable ones. Let's add the softpedia review to the article.
1721:
1483:
1467:
They are a row on the lowest table but don't appear in any of the others. Was it removed? Shouldn't the same number of programs be in each table?
1195:
269:
of discussion by someone else, but before responses can take place, and using misleading edit summaries. Primary sources are not "not RS" - see
852:. Note that we will go quite far to establish a source as reliable, if their work is of such high quality that they are quoted by others: see
416:
2094:
1251:, but mere presence on a list at IJ isn't substantial discussion. So, we still await more reviews of the client. These things take time. --
1248:
859:
853:
318:
a review in a specialized website.... by an acquitance of the author.... because he had previously worked in a program made by the author.
646:
Neebly IRC Client is a nice tool designed to help you connect with your favorite IRC channels and get in touch with your online friends.
1907:
1866:
1822:
1801:
1758:
1647:
1564:
1229:
1108:
1083:
894:
831:
394:
In all, the two independent sources provided are enough, and independent enough, and are certainly better than some other sources here.
1655:
1589:
1534:
1513:
150:
2120:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1949:
column in the protocols table. And I created this new section in the talk page so anyone can say something related to the edit. --
540:. The first paragraph is just an introduction, and half the second paragraph is a paraphrasing of the publisher's self-description
1182:
47:
17:
1390:
Some other notable organisations that I can think of that run their own qwebirc installations (or forks of it) include the
735:
734:
Cool. I've added it. Also edited the lead tersely to state the bare minimum inclusion criteria, similar to the model at
663:
616:
849:
637:
584:
325:
No books, only independent review is a short mass-made review in a download website. This is not a notable IRC client. --
2185:
588:
There are so many
Internet Relay Chat (IRC) clients for Windows that it's hard to see what yet another one could bring.
2110:
235:
acceptable here than several others. My beardstroking opinion is keep. There are also mentions in news sources like
141:
800:
ThrashIRC was added by an IP, with CNET and Yahoo refs, both not reviews. I commented it out, pending better RS. --
38:
2101:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110725195312/http://www.irc-junkie.org/2010-09-13/ii-a-filesystem-based-irc-client/
2062:
626:
549:
2141:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2082:
1677:
1946:
1127:
378:
231:
Has one totally independent RS, a primary website, and established author expertise in two pubs. I think it's
1911:
1870:
1826:
1762:
1568:
371:
Independence of the MIRC review is not damaged by long-ago acquaintance, or long-ago work on a work by Mudge.
2176:
2054:
1981:
1954:
1805:
1784:
1371:
1233:
1145:
1112:
1087:
1039:
898:
835:
1926:
IMHO, the usage of {{partial|script}} should be replaced with {{yes2|script}} or {{unofficial|script}}. —
1903:
1818:
1797:
1585:
1530:
1509:
1355:
1225:
1170:
1104:
890:
218:
2. Softonic.com has passed RSN, as discussed here previously, and considered both independent and reliable.
1931:
1728:
1666:
1659:
1593:
1538:
1517:
946:
381:
while ignoring their usability here. They meet the requirements for use as primary and secondary sources.
2104:
1973:
241:. mirc.net, 20 November 2004, which due to longevity and topic expertise I would have no problem citing.
2160:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2148:
2095:
http://www.irc-junkie.org/2009-01-24/hydrairc-releases-version-03165-and-opens-access-to-its-sourcecode/
1977:
1880:
Do you have a source for that? That would help justify the removal. It's been in there quite a while. --
1850:
1141:
1035:
777:
713:
559:
442:
397:
It's unseemly for Knowledge (XXG) editors to be personally insulting and deprecatory against sources. --
330:
205:
2053:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2026:
1554:
541:
1865:
But rather a collection of all reverse SEND protcols. I think it should not be included in the table.
1737:
Agreed - I usually explain this very thing in the edit summary when removing multiprotocol clients. --
1350:
995:
957:
1450:
1446:
1309:
Two clients have been added which are not sourced sufficiently for inclusion in this list. A single
1050:
2002:
1527:(Forgot to sign this .. either way, it's time to move past old disagreements on inclusion. -Mike)
1310:
2190:
2030:
2010:
2006:
1985:
1958:
1935:
1915:
1889:
1874:
1854:
1830:
1809:
1789:
1766:
1746:
1731:
1707:
1689:
1669:
1651:
1636:
1617:
1609:
1597:
1572:
1558:
1542:
1521:
1495:
1476:
1454:
1431:
1415:
1341:
1299:
1280:
1260:
1237:
1207:
1186:
1174:
1149:
1123:
1116:
1091:
1076:
1043:
1018:
999:
980:
961:
933:
902:
873:
839:
809:
781:
751:
717:
682:
563:
526:
493:
446:
406:
334:
290:
254:
209:
2072:
2022:
1482:
Yes, the tables should be consistent. However, Pidgin is a multiprotocol client, so it belongs in
1272:
1271:
Pidgin (at least on Windows) does not support the irc: URI scheme. Does it support it on Linux? --
986:
I have "thrashirc reviewed by" in my Google alerts and was surprised when it delivered this today
302:
Dr. Dobb's is about a different program from the same author, jIRCii is only mentioned in passing.
1950:
1778:
1613:
1442:
Hello, it would be nice if someone would add information on the Conversation IRC Client for MAC:
1178:
991:
953:
554:
I think that Neebly has only one "passable source", which makes it fall short of the criteria. --
281:
On the scale from "unsourced/bubble/squeeky/okay/solid" scale, this entry, jIRCii, seems okay. --
2145:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2161:
1976:
I won't add it because of COI, but would appreciate if active editors would consider sources.
1136:
I read this discussion a few times a week out of curiosity, which...I need to stop, because of
1927:
1725:
1663:
1276:
383:
225:
177:
147:
1032:
673:
Thanks for finding the Softpedia review, and for hopefully reconsidering the Softonic one. --
1885:
1846:
1742:
1703:
1695:
1685:
1632:
1491:
1427:
1337:
1295:
1256:
1203:
1072:
1014:
976:
929:
869:
816:
805:
773:
747:
709:
678:
555:
522:
489:
438:
402:
326:
286:
250:
201:
2168:
1720:
This is an IM client (not just IRC; it uses libpurple apparently) and indeed is already in
1360:
1137:
1025:
314:
1842:
1315:
368:
Notability of Mudge is not invalidated by self-publishing a book, when other works exist.
270:
2127:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1472:
1411:
299:
Self-published sources show zero notability, since the author pays for the publication.
2167:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2134:
1680:
voluntarily, rather than subjected to the obvious result of snowball delete !votes. --
739:
362:
354:
1376:
2111:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120425153531/http://www.mirc.net/news/index.php?id=175
1314:
after long, painful discussion - see the discussion archives. Please note that if
921:
221:
3. The book - meh. I included it for some detail, and supporting author notability.
1443:
613:
Interface is rather cluttered and spread out Not as polished as major IRC clients
1881:
1738:
1699:
1681:
1628:
1487:
1423:
1333:
1291:
1252:
1199:
1068:
1010:
972:
925:
865:
824:
Hi sir, regarding adding ThrashIRC to the list, would this page of awards help?
801:
743:
674:
518:
485:
398:
282:
246:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
708:
Maybe we should put the original verbose criteria at the top of the article? --
2133:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2063:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110812090202/http://bersirc.org/index.php/about/
1024:
I'm the author of ThrashIRC so I want the editors/contributors to know I have
987:
2088:
2083:
http://www.lockergnome.com/sscott721/2007/07/28/my-top-5-free-software-picks/
1403:
1318:
reliable sources are not found, these clients will be deleted from the list:
2114:
1468:
1407:
952:
love this client, and could not find one review from an authoritative site.
238:
1399:
1757:
I'm using it right now, and it's not working. Yet the table says it does.
1049:
Thanks for declaring. There are a couple of pages of ircresource.info at
390:
review is enough by itself, and the MIRC.net is financially independent.
387:
1387:), it is not deployed by the general public: they just use the website.
1486:, not here, which is primarily about solely IRC clients. Good catch. --
947:
https://upload.cnet.com/2706-21_5-979-5.html?tag=rb_content;contentBody
2105:
http://www.irc-junkie.org/2010-09-13/ii-a-filesystem-based-irc-client/
2066:
1974:
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Chat/IRC-Clients/ThrashIRC.shtml
1460:
1029:
349:
Continued use of the term "notability" is incorrect for list items.
172:
1220:
1099:
825:
425:
at -least- mention of the client in one reliable third party source
228:
article - editorially reviewed, and therefore reliable, if primary.
131:
Review in download website that mass-make reviews for its programs.
1815:
Also missing: Adium, Pidgin, all the IRC clients for iOS/Android
1624:
772:
Yes, links to WP pages usually go in notices in the talk pages. --
573:
538:
1900:
The latest versions of Opera browser do not have an IRC client.
862:), 4) nothing happens without effort, 5) sour grapes don't help."
2073:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110128122510/http://hydrairc.com/
120:
1922:{{partial|script}} vs {{yes2|script}} or {{unofficial|script}}
1005:
Thanks for the heads up. It's not a substantial enough review
634:
581:
99:
25:
1395:
1214:
irc-junkies.org list of clients, main page missing ThrashIRC.
265:
However, Schmucky is again not discussing, deleting upon the
1627:) to editing huge, fragile tables. Feel free to help out! --
1366:
417:
Knowledge (XXG):Lists_(stand-alone_lists)#Selection_criteria
351:
No requirement for notability exists for items in an article
2076:
1969:
1776:
Can LeafChat and hIRC both be included please? I use them.
548:
Softpedia has a three paragraph description of its features
2057:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1996:
1724:, so I think it should be removed from here. Consensus?
1160:
1968:
ThrashIRC may qualify for this list with primary source
1841:. You need that the client is mentioned in at least one
1384:
1245:(Restored deleted comment as appropriate for discussion)
607:
Uses Ribbon menus Many different servers to choose from
419:. OK, I'll drop "notability", "primary", etc. see below.
2050:
262:
I notice that Enric is at least discussing. Thank you.
1367:
Gamesurge news article with their support for qwebirc
215:
1. Primary, accepted as with every other client here.
1391:
2137:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1372:
discussion on Mibbit's security, suggesting qwebirc
1351:
Review of QuakeNet's web-based client on IRC-junkie
968:
1163:) is missing from this comparison of IRC clients.
643:A modern, hip & funky IRC client for Windows
1656:Comparison of mobile Internet Relay Chat clients
742:may have to go, since it's a reference to WP. --
1444:http://homepage.mac.com/philrobin/conversation/
2123:This message was posted before February 2018.
386:is an editorially-supervised publication. The
1031:on date 13 May 10 and also the Facebook post
8:
1194:Adium is a multiprotocol client, covered by
1155:Adium client is missing from this comparison
990:on the page is "Reviewed by: Ciuta Ciprian"
551:, and would qualify as "a passable source".
537:Only has a two paragraph review in Softtonic
1267:Pidgin does not support the irc: URI scheme
2089:http://www.hydrairc.com/content/developers
1034:same date. I'm sorry that's all I have :(
2115:http://www.mirc.net/news/index.php?id=175
2047:Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients
2045:I have just modified 7 external links on
200:No independent reviews, no notability. --
185:. M&T Publications: 38. July 1, 2005.
2016:List not sortable by last stable release
173:"Scripting Java Applications with Sleep"
1722:Comparison_of_instant_messaging_clients
1484:Comparison of instant messaging clients
1196:Comparison of instant messaging clients
1059:reviewed by Solitary_Scar, 13 May 2010.
848:consider reliable sources, please read
1604:Purple background / not in development
1356:Freenode switch to qwebirc from Mibbit
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
924:no money is involved at any point. --
119:Rasson, Damien (September 22, 2009).
7:
1623:I have developed a kind of allergy (
1082:I added another note at the bottom.
545:I didn't click in "Read more"....
305:The only sources for notability are:
2067:http://bersirc.org/index.php/about/
1964:ThrashIRC may qualify for this list
1794:What about ClicksAndWhistles? :D
1650:has added this client here and on
1247:IRC-Junkie is considered reliable
100:"jIRCII - The Ultimate IRC Client"
24:
2049:. Please take a moment to review
1346:Here's some sources for qwebirc:
415:Lists have an inclusion criteria
121:"Robusto cliente IRC con scripts"
826:http://www.thrashirc.com/awards/
359:only applies for whole articles.
194:Written by the author of jIRCii.
29:
2093:Corrected formatting/usage for
2087:Corrected formatting/usage for
2081:Corrected formatting/usage for
1896:Opera does not have IRC anymore
1753:HydraIRC does not support UTF-8
1438:Conversation IRC client missing
660:· Microsoft .Net Framework 3.5
423:inclusion criteria was set to "
1767:05:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
1077:19:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
1044:17:52, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
1019:00:02, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
641:Neebly IRC Client description
18:Talk:Comparison of IRC clients
1:
1658:, as well as its own article
1432:01:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
1416:22:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
1342:11:46, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
1300:12:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
1261:20:58, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
1238:05:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
1208:22:09, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
1187:17:53, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
1150:20:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
1117:05:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
1092:05:15, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
1000:20:21, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
782:14:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
752:13:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
736:List of common misconceptions
718:09:58, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
683:06:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
564:17:12, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
527:05:14, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
494:00:32, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
447:12:14, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
407:11:52, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
365:, both primary and secondary.
335:11:14, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
291:06:44, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
255:06:17, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
210:00:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
2031:01:40, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
1916:22:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
1553:This column currently lists
1281:00:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
2191:16:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
1861:Passive SEND is not a thing
1855:16:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
1843:reliable third party source
1831:07:41, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
1747:23:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
1732:20:31, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
1708:22:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
1690:18:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
1670:17:30, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
1637:18:37, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
1361:Initial release on QuakeNet
1305:Unsourced QwebIRC and Pchat
1221:irc-junkies.org IRC clients
1100:irc-junkies.org IRC clients
981:16:04, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
962:15:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
2206:
2154:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2042:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1959:19:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
1598:14:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
1578:References are out of sync
1543:00:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
1522:00:44, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
1496:02:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
1477:03:20, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
1455:14:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
1363:(disclaimer: I wrote this)
934:21:23, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
903:19:16, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
874:12:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
860:WP:WikiProject IRC/Sources
854:WP:WikiProject IRC/Sources
840:11:17, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
810:09:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
361:List items require RS per
1986:16:38, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
1936:07:23, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
1618:00:57, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
1573:17:14, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
1549:Computing platform column
2077:http://www.hydrairc.com/
2011:21:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
1970:http://www.thrashirc.com
1941:Off-the-Record Messaging
1837:Months ago we discussed
1810:17:11, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
1377:Staticbox launch qwebirc
2038:External links modified
1997:http://rcr.io/rirc.html
1890:12:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
1875:07:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
1790:20:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
379:not to like the sources
146:. CreateSpace. p. 131.
140:Mudge, Raphael (2008).
123:(in Spanish). Softonic.
279:for this narrow topic.
273:- they are merely not
1972:and secondary source
1839:an inclusion criteria
738:. The wikilinking to
42:of past discussions.
2135:regular verification
1660:Palaver (IRC client)
1051:the Internet Archive
971:would be helpful. --
2125:After February 2018
1652:Internet Relay Chat
1559:computing platforms
1557:rather than actual
856:. To quote myself,
850:WP:Reliable sources
102:. oldschoolirc.com.
2179:InternetArchiveBot
2130:InternetArchiveBot
1161:Adium's about page
2155:
1906:comment added by
1821:comment added by
1800:comment added by
1588:comment added by
1555:CPU architectures
1533:comment added by
1512:comment added by
1228:comment added by
1190:
1173:comment added by
1107:comment added by
988:software informer
893:comment added by
668:
667:
621:
620:
384:Dr. Dobbs Journal
226:Dr. Dobbs Journal
178:Dr. Dobbs Journal
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2197:
2189:
2180:
2153:
2152:
2131:
1945:I just added an
1918:
1833:
1812:
1787:
1781:
1696:User talk:XDAREx
1600:
1545:
1524:
1404:The Pirate Party
1240:
1189:
1167:
1119:
969:http://imgur.com
905:
817:User talk:Lexein
815:moved here from
635:
582:
512:Subsided dispute
186:
156:
143:Sleep 2.1 Manual
124:
103:
98:Mudge, Raphael.
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2205:
2204:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2183:
2178:
2146:
2139:have permission
2129:
2055:this simple FaQ
2040:
2018:
1993:
1966:
1943:
1924:
1901:
1898:
1863:
1816:
1795:
1785:
1779:
1774:
1755:
1718:
1694:Hey! Check out
1645:
1606:
1583:
1580:
1551:
1528:
1507:
1504:
1465:
1440:
1400:Knowledge (XXG)
1307:
1288:
1269:
1223:
1216:
1168:
1157:
1102:
888:
798:
534:
514:
239:"jIRCii review"
171:
163:Self-published.
153:
139:
118:
110:Self-published.
97:
90:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2203:
2201:
2173:
2172:
2165:
2118:
2117:
2109:Added archive
2107:
2099:Added archive
2097:
2091:
2085:
2079:
2071:Added archive
2069:
2061:Added archive
2039:
2036:
2017:
2014:
1992:
1989:
1965:
1962:
1942:
1939:
1923:
1920:
1897:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1862:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1773:
1770:
1754:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1717:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1644:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1605:
1602:
1579:
1576:
1550:
1547:
1503:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1464:
1458:
1439:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1380:
1379:
1374:
1369:
1364:
1358:
1353:
1327:
1326:
1323:
1306:
1303:
1287:
1284:
1268:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1215:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1156:
1153:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1124:SchmuckyTheCat
1080:
1079:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1022:
1021:
984:
983:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
922:on CNET's site
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
879:
878:
877:
876:
829:
828:
797:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
688:
687:
686:
685:
666:
665:
662:
657:Requirements:
639:
633:
632:
631:
630:
619:
618:
615:
586:
580:
579:
578:
577:
533:
530:
513:
510:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
431:
430:
420:
410:
409:
395:
392:
375:
372:
369:
366:
340:
339:
338:
337:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
316:
307:
306:
303:
300:
294:
293:
263:
243:
242:
236:
229:
222:
219:
216:
198:
197:
196:
195:
189:
188:
167:
166:
165:
164:
158:
157:
152:978-1438227238
151:
135:
134:
133:
132:
126:
125:
114:
113:
112:
111:
105:
104:
89:
86:
83:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2202:
2193:
2192:
2187:
2182:
2181:
2170:
2166:
2163:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2150:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2132:
2126:
2121:
2116:
2112:
2108:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2096:
2092:
2090:
2086:
2084:
2080:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2056:
2052:
2048:
2043:
2037:
2035:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2015:
2013:
2012:
2008:
2004:
1999:
1998:
1990:
1988:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1978:AnthonyThrash
1975:
1971:
1963:
1961:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1951:Arthurfragoso
1948:
1940:
1938:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1921:
1919:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1908:91.152.37.101
1905:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1867:84.80.121.130
1860:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1823:67.166.150.33
1820:
1813:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1802:92.40.253.231
1799:
1792:
1791:
1788:
1783:
1782:
1771:
1769:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1759:72.160.92.210
1752:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1730:
1727:
1723:
1715:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1668:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1648:86.149.241.65
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1603:
1601:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1577:
1575:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1565:71.184.245.22
1562:
1560:
1556:
1548:
1546:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1525:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1462:
1459:
1457:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1445:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1388:
1386:
1378:
1375:
1373:
1370:
1368:
1365:
1362:
1359:
1357:
1354:
1352:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1324:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1317:
1312:
1304:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1285:
1283:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1230:24.225.23.147
1227:
1222:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1164:
1162:
1154:
1152:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1142:AnthonyThrash
1139:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1109:24.225.23.147
1106:
1101:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1084:24.225.23.147
1078:
1074:
1070:
1065:
1064:
1058:
1055:
1054:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1036:AnthonyThrash
1033:
1030:
1027:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
965:
964:
963:
959:
955:
949:
948:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
904:
900:
896:
895:24.225.23.147
892:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
875:
871:
867:
863:
861:
855:
851:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
837:
833:
832:24.225.23.147
827:
823:
822:
821:
819:
818:
812:
811:
807:
803:
795:
783:
779:
775:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
719:
715:
711:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
684:
680:
676:
672:
671:
670:
669:
661:
658:
655:
651:
647:
644:
640:
636:
628:
625:
624:
623:
622:
614:
611:
608:
605:
602:
599:
596:
592:
587:
583:
575:
572:
571:
568:
567:
566:
565:
561:
557:
552:
550:
546:
544:
542:
539:
531:
529:
528:
524:
520:
511:
495:
491:
487:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
448:
444:
440:
435:
434:
433:
432:
428:
426:
421:
418:
414:
413:
412:
411:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
391:
389:
385:
380:
376:
373:
370:
367:
364:
360:
357:. Notability
356:
352:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
336:
332:
328:
324:
317:
315:
311:
310:
309:
308:
304:
301:
298:
297:
296:
295:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
240:
237:
234:
230:
227:
223:
220:
217:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
193:
192:
191:
190:
187:</ref: -->
184:
180:
179:
174:
169:
168:
162:
161:
160:
159:
154:
149:
145:
144:
137:
136:
130:
129:
128:
127:
122:
116:
115:
109:
108:
107:
106:
101:
95:
94:
93:
92:The sources:
87:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2177:
2174:
2149:source check
2128:
2122:
2119:
2044:
2041:
2019:
2000:
1994:
1967:
1944:
1925:
1902:— Preceding
1899:
1864:
1817:— Preceding
1814:
1796:— Preceding
1793:
1777:
1775:
1756:
1719:
1646:
1607:
1590:96.42.66.188
1584:— Preceding
1581:
1563:
1552:
1535:96.42.66.188
1529:— Preceding
1526:
1514:96.42.66.188
1508:— Preceding
1505:
1466:
1441:
1389:
1381:
1345:
1329:
1328:
1308:
1289:
1270:
1244:
1224:— Preceding
1217:
1169:— Preceding
1165:
1158:
1135:
1103:— Preceding
1081:
1023:
1006:
985:
950:
944:
889:— Preceding
857:
830:
814:
813:
799:
659:
656:
652:
648:
645:
642:
612:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
593:
589:
553:
547:
536:
535:
515:
480:
476:
424:
382:
358:
350:
278:
274:
266:
244:
232:
199:
182:
176:
142:
91:
78:
43:
37:
1847:Enric Naval
1772:Missed some
1716:Instantbird
774:Enric Naval
710:Enric Naval
556:Enric Naval
439:Enric Naval
327:Enric Naval
275:independent
202:Enric Naval
36:This is an
2186:Report bug
1780:Rcsprinter
1447:Mayhaymate
1007:on its own
2169:this tool
2162:this tool
2003:Lunavorax
1991:rIRC dead
1786:(deliver)
1396:Wikileaks
1057:ThrashIRC
796:ThrashIRC
627:Softpedia
377:You seem
353:- reread
79:Archive 5
73:Archive 4
68:Archive 3
60:Archive 1
2175:Cheers.—
1904:unsigned
1819:unsigned
1798:unsigned
1678:userfied
1610:CTA MART
1586:unsigned
1531:unsigned
1510:unsigned
1226:unsigned
1183:contribs
1175:BobNewby
1171:unsigned
1105:unsigned
891:unsigned
574:Softonic
388:Softonic
2051:my edit
2023:SweBers
1643:Palaver
1463:absence
1325:QwebIRC
1311:primary
1273:Xerces8
1159:Adium (
39:archive
1882:Lexein
1739:Lexein
1700:Lexein
1682:Lexein
1629:Lexein
1488:Lexein
1461:Pidgin
1424:Lexein
1334:Lexein
1292:Lexein
1286:Boldly
1253:Lexein
1249:lately
1200:Lexein
1138:WP:COI
1069:Lexein
1026:WP:COI
1011:Lexein
992:KymmyD
973:Lexein
954:KymmyD
926:Lexein
866:Lexein
802:Lexein
744:Lexein
675:Lexein
604:Pros:
532:Neebly
519:Lexein
486:Lexein
399:Lexein
283:Lexein
247:Lexein
88:jIRCii
1625:hives
1502:IRCjr
1402:and
1385:Rizon
1322:Pchat
1316:WP:RS
1166:Bob
610:Cons
271:WP:RS
267:start
16:<
2027:talk
2007:talk
1982:talk
1955:talk
1932:talk
1928:Wulf
1912:talk
1886:talk
1871:talk
1851:talk
1827:talk
1806:talk
1763:talk
1743:talk
1704:talk
1686:talk
1654:and
1633:talk
1614:talk
1594:talk
1569:talk
1539:talk
1518:talk
1492:talk
1473:talk
1469:Y12J
1451:talk
1428:talk
1412:talk
1408:Slug
1338:talk
1296:talk
1277:talk
1257:talk
1234:talk
1204:talk
1198:. --
1179:talk
1146:talk
1128:talk
1113:talk
1088:talk
1073:talk
1040:talk
1015:talk
996:talk
977:talk
958:talk
930:talk
899:talk
870:talk
836:talk
806:talk
778:talk
748:talk
740:WP:V
714:talk
679:talk
560:talk
523:talk
490:talk
481:this
477:ever
443:talk
403:talk
363:WP:V
355:WP:N
331:talk
287:talk
251:talk
233:more
206:talk
148:ISBN
2143:RfC
2113:to
2103:to
2075:to
2065:to
1947:OTR
1392:W3C
224:4.
2156:.
2151:}}
2147:{{
2029:)
2009:)
2001:--
1984:)
1957:)
1934:)
1914:)
1888:)
1873:)
1853:)
1829:)
1808:)
1765:)
1745:)
1706:)
1688:)
1635:)
1616:)
1596:)
1571:)
1541:)
1520:)
1494:)
1475:)
1453:)
1430:)
1422:--
1414:)
1406:.
1398:,
1394:,
1340:)
1332:--
1298:)
1279:)
1259:)
1236:)
1219:*:
1206:)
1185:)
1181:•
1148:)
1115:)
1090:)
1075:)
1067:--
1042:)
1017:)
998:)
979:)
960:)
932:)
901:)
872:)
864:--
838:)
820::
808:)
780:)
750:)
716:)
681:)
664:”
638:“
617:”
585:“
562:)
525:)
492:)
445:)
437:--
405:)
333:)
289:)
253:)
245:--
208:)
183:30
181:.
175:.
170:4
138:3
117:2
96:1
64:←
2188:)
2184:(
2171:.
2164:.
2025:(
2005:(
1980:(
1953:(
1930:(
1910:(
1884:(
1869:(
1849:(
1825:(
1804:(
1761:(
1741:(
1729:T
1726:P
1702:(
1684:(
1667:T
1664:P
1631:(
1612:(
1592:(
1567:(
1537:(
1516:(
1490:(
1471:(
1449:(
1426:(
1410:(
1336:(
1294:(
1275:(
1255:(
1232:(
1202:(
1177:(
1144:(
1130:)
1126:(
1111:(
1098:*
1086:(
1071:(
1038:(
1013:(
994:(
975:(
956:(
928:(
897:(
868:(
834:(
804:(
776:(
746:(
712:(
677:(
629::
576::
558:(
521:(
488:(
441:(
429:.
427:"
401:(
329:(
285:(
249:(
204:(
155:.
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.