Knowledge

Talk:Conserved current

Source 📝

189: 268:
by single characters that have many different usages in different contexts. If this author defines the meaning of these terms in words then they can be hyperlinked to other references in Knowledge. Without that, the article is only of use to people who are already familiar with the concepts, surely Wikipedians deserve more than this? If the original author of that section is not available, it would be great if anyone else who is familiar with the terms could define them, as is now becoming de rigeur in all Knowledge articles -
84: 74: 53: 179: 158: 22: 267:
I believe this is a very important topic, but... What does the symbol "j" mean, what does the symbol mu mean, etc. Can whoever wrote this please take some responsibility and define the terms they used, this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a document containing undiscoverable terms represented
297:
I came across this page following a link from "Noether's Theorem" and found this definition. I think I can intuit from the example what is meant, but can anybody come up with something pithy to define it without reference back to the theorem? Please forgive any breaches of etiquette, I'm very new.
428:
alone: that deals with a bigger set of topics and issues than merely conserved quantities. (viz it goes into the virasoro algebras and into operators, etc. which these articles don't get into, and which are inappropriate for Noether's theorem) 03:56, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
373: 415:
Someone, (not me) added merge templates to these two articles. They did not cite any reason for thye merge proposal, so let me provide those words. Besides overlapping with each other, both overlap somewhat with the article
140: 496: 440:
on the grounds that a conservation law is a better commonly understood that Noether's theorm. Oppose also the merge of the current and quantity pages as there are aspects of the
394:
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class.
379:
In words, there is a quantitative attribute (like electric charge or energy) which can move around, but can never appear from nothing nor disappear to nothing. OK?
420:. My knee-jerk reaction is that the merge proposal sounds reasonable, although I get the feeling that perhaps the wisest choice is to redirect both of these to 245: 481: 130: 321: 491: 476: 235: 106: 188: 486: 278: 211: 97: 58: 202: 163: 33: 444:
page with are distinct and, I feel, distinctly notable. The direction of the proposed merge also surprises me, as
282: 21: 39: 83: 274: 395: 210:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
437: 421: 409: 89: 73: 52: 457: 405: 425: 417: 380: 299: 269: 194: 470: 453: 368:{\displaystyle {\frac {\partial \rho }{\partial t}}+\nabla \cdot \mathbf {J} =0} 178: 157: 102: 184: 79: 461: 398: 383: 302: 286: 308:
Thank you for your interest and participation. The lead is talking about
207: 15: 324: 206:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 367: 312:the notion of conserved current is important. The 497:Stub-Class physics articles of Mid-importance 8: 152: 47: 19: 354: 325: 323: 452:. Overall, I see no point in the merge. 154: 49: 7: 316:is given by the formula below that: 200:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 348: 336: 328: 14: 482:Low-priority mathematics articles 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 355: 187: 177: 156: 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 492:Mid-importance physics articles 477:Stub-Class mathematics articles 240:This article has been rated as 135:This article has been rated as 1: 399:09:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 220:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics 214:and see a list of open tasks. 109:and see a list of open tasks. 448:seems more fundamental than 223:Template:WikiProject Physics 487:Stub-Class physics articles 436:the idea of merging all to 513: 462:21:48, 29 April 2018 (UTC) 246:project's importance scale 384:09:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 303:05:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 287:14:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC) 263:Please define the symbols 239: 172: 134: 67: 46: 390:WikiProject class rating 141:project's priority scale 98:WikiProject Mathematics 369: 28:This article is rated 370: 322: 121:mathematics articles 203:WikiProject Physics 410:Conserved quantity 365: 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 438:Noether's theorem 424:. However, leave 422:Noether's theorem 406:Conserved current 343: 277:comment added by 260: 259: 256: 255: 252: 251: 151: 150: 147: 146: 504: 426:charge (physics) 418:charge (physics) 374: 372: 371: 366: 358: 344: 342: 334: 326: 289: 228: 227: 226:physics articles 224: 221: 218: 197: 192: 191: 181: 174: 173: 168: 160: 153: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 512: 511: 507: 506: 505: 503: 502: 501: 467: 466: 413: 392: 335: 327: 320: 319: 295: 293:Tautology alert 272: 265: 225: 222: 219: 216: 215: 193: 186: 166: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 510: 508: 500: 499: 494: 489: 484: 479: 469: 468: 465: 464: 412: 402: 396:BetacommandBot 391: 388: 387: 386: 377: 376: 375: 364: 361: 357: 353: 350: 347: 341: 338: 333: 330: 294: 291: 264: 261: 258: 257: 254: 253: 250: 249: 242:Mid-importance 238: 232: 231: 229: 212:the discussion 199: 198: 195:Physics portal 182: 170: 169: 167:Mid‑importance 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 509: 498: 495: 493: 490: 488: 485: 483: 480: 478: 475: 474: 472: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 432: 431: 430: 427: 423: 419: 411: 407: 403: 401: 400: 397: 389: 385: 382: 378: 362: 359: 351: 345: 339: 331: 318: 317: 315: 311: 307: 306: 305: 304: 301: 292: 290: 288: 284: 280: 279:119.12.66.203 276: 271: 262: 247: 243: 237: 234: 233: 230: 213: 209: 205: 204: 196: 190: 185: 183: 180: 176: 175: 171: 165: 162: 159: 155: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 449: 445: 441: 433: 414: 393: 313: 309: 296: 266: 241: 201: 137:Low-priority 136: 96: 62:Low‑priority 40:WikiProjects 273:—Preceding 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 471:Categories 314:definition 30:Stub-class 404:Merge of 381:JRSpriggs 300:Toospaice 270:jjalexand 446:quantity 275:unsigned 454:Klbrain 450:current 442:current 244:on the 217:Physics 208:Physics 164:Physics 139:on the 434:Oppose 36:scale. 458:talk 408:and 283:talk 310:why 236:Mid 131:Low 473:: 460:) 352:⋅ 349:∇ 337:∂ 332:ρ 329:∂ 285:) 456:( 363:0 360:= 356:J 346:+ 340:t 281:( 248:. 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Low
project's priority scale
WikiProject icon
Physics
WikiProject icon
icon
Physics portal
WikiProject Physics
Physics
the discussion
Mid
project's importance scale
jjalexand
unsigned
119.12.66.203
talk
14:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Toospaice
05:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.