Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Conventional superconductor

Source 📝

84: 74: 53: 22: 216:
Merging proposal deleted as discussed on the corresponding pages. "Conventional" has nothing to do with "type-I". "BCS superconductor" is appropriate, but there is a nice symmetry between "conventional supercondtor" and "unconventional supercondtor", and there is no good alternative for the latter.
212:
I agree. Perhaps the article should be changed to "BCS superconductor", with a re-direct from "conventional superconductor". Can an optional link be provided for those people who type in "conventional superconductor", but actually want "type-I superconductor"?
198:(who did the merge) and I have briefly discussed the issue and agree a final solution might be to re-organize the articles the classify superconductors, but in the meantime I feel it is important to make the content correct. 250: 140: 245: 130: 83: 106: 240: 191: 97: 58: 33: 179: 194:
yields hits from several hits from books, aps.org, iop.org, etc., as do variations of "BCS Type-II superconductor".
39: 21: 183: 105:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
222: 203: 163: 190:", not Type-I. I don't have a particular reference handy, but a Google search for the phrase 218: 226: 207: 169: 89: 234: 199: 166: 73: 52: 195: 187: 79: 102: 217:
The discussed aritcles should gradually evolve from stubs to GAs.
15: 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 251:Stub-Class physics articles of Low-importance 8: 47: 19: 186:. Conventional means "explained by the 49: 162:I suggest this article be merged with 192:"conventional Type-II superconductor" 7: 95:This article is within the scope of 115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Physics 38:It is of interest to the following 14: 82: 72: 51: 20: 246:Low-importance physics articles 135:This article has been rated as 1: 170:16:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 227:11:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 118:Template:WikiProject Physics 241:Stub-Class physics articles 180:Conventional superconductor 267: 208:02:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC) 182:should not be merged with 141:project's importance scale 134: 67: 46: 28:This article is rated 184:Type I superconductor 175:Conventional ≠ Type-I 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 98:WikiProject Physics 34:content assessment 164:superconductivity 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 258: 123: 122: 121:physics articles 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 266: 265: 261: 260: 259: 257: 256: 255: 231: 230: 177: 160: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 264: 262: 254: 253: 248: 243: 233: 232: 176: 173: 159: 156: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 137:Low-importance 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 90:Physics portal 77: 65: 64: 62:Low‑importance 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 263: 252: 249: 247: 244: 242: 239: 238: 236: 229: 228: 224: 220: 214: 210: 209: 205: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 174: 172: 171: 168: 165: 157: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 215: 211: 178: 161: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 235:Categories 219:NIMSoffice 188:BCS theory 30:Stub-class 200:Spiel496 167:Jdedmond 158:Untitled 139:on the 112:Physics 103:Physics 59:Physics 36:scale. 196:Eynar 223:talk 204:talk 131:Low 237:: 225:) 206:) 221:( 202:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Physics
WikiProject icon
icon
Physics portal
WikiProject Physics
Physics
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
superconductivity
Jdedmond
16:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Conventional superconductor
Type I superconductor
BCS theory
"conventional Type-II superconductor"
Eynar
Spiel496
talk
02:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
NIMSoffice
talk
11:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Categories
Stub-Class physics articles
Low-importance physics articles

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.