Talk:Calculator - Knowledge

3846:

mechanical veeder root designs that had a series of counting wheels that went round and round generating a carry to the next wheel when the ten count was reached. The next most mentioned design was the application specific chip sets that immediately preceeded the actual microprocessor designs (the 4004 and 4040 intel chips and the PPS4 and PPS8 rockwell chipsets). However in between the counting tube and counting circuit designs and the first application specific chipsets there were quite a few machines that used many discreet i.c.'s that implemented a serial calculator design. The Frieden 130 and the Victor 500 series (that used crt displays) were actually of this type. The memory element was either a magnostrictive delay line of a shift register (either dynamic or static). The calculation circuits were actually single bit arraignments. Numbers were coded into a parallel to serial shift register (keyboard input) and then dumped into the serial memory. As the bits came out of the serial memory they went into another register just prior to going into the adder/subtracter. the data stream then went into one of three or four display registers (to be sent to the 'stroke generator' that drove the crt display). One of these registers (one could call it the 'accumulator) would be sent back to the serial memory. Most of my experiance was with the Victor line of calculators, but I also worked on Sharp, Casion, and a host of other serial based machines. There was usually a binary counter and decoder to develope timing signals to get the data into and out of the serial memory in a timely fashion (this was usually reffered to as a 'stste machine'). I have some info on the discreet chios that were used in these early designs and would love to collaborate with someone on expounding on this design.

4502: 264: 254: 233: 200: 776:

binary numbers, and add, subtract, multiply, and divide those. While a computer might do much arithmetic before needing to display the result, calculators normally display intermediate results. It is easier and faster to do all the calculation in BCD than to convert to/from pure binary at each step. It is easy (in logic) and fast enough, to do a BCD digit serial processor along with some shift registers. It would be nice to show this in more detail.

1538:, which says "Recentism is writing or editing without a long-term, historical view ... resulting in ... muddling or diffusion of the timeless facets of a subject, previously recognized by Knowledge consensus." Let's don't do that. When the calculator article was split into mechanical and electronic parts, the titles should have been adjusted to reflect that. The prior concensus was that both are important facets of calculators. 3633: 4446: 1962:. If you look in books (in Google book search, for example), you'll find "calculator" used for a huge variety of things, including software apps, books of tables, cardboard analog contrivances, etc. And you'll find "electronic calculator" used in many more books than "mechanical calculator". Taken together, and looking at the contents of this article, and the history of its split from 191: 943:– whether electronic calculator is the primary topic or not is irrelevant. If it is, it should redirect to "electronic calculator", and if it's not it should be a disambig. Either way, since mechanical calculators were taken out of what was previously a larger-scope article, the title "electronic calculator" does a much better job of saying what this article is about. 733:. But what about trigonometric functions and square roots? How does a calculator know the answer there? It's clear logic gates are involved, but it would be interesting to see an explanation that makes sense. Would anyone know how to explain this in the article? I might if I find some more background info, but if someone understands it already then that might save time. 4307:

There is Disagreement over the use of calculators in school? A certain 8th grade student studying in Europe cannot do 25+10, in his head, but depends on his calculator to do it. Why is there disagreement? Calculators certainly suppress arithmetic skills in young students. Soon we shall see arithmetic

4142:

As far as I know, it is usual, from pretty much the beginning of electronic hand calculators through today, to do BCD digit serial arithmetic. Even more, the wikilink links to serial communication, and not bit serial ALU discussion. The logic for a BCD digit serial add/subtract is fairly simple, and

3378:

The section "Internal working" seems out of date, and is referenced to a 30 year old publication by Usborne, which I recall is a publisher of children's books. I am inclined to delete the whole section, but will hang fire for a couple of days to see if there are any objections, particularly as it has

3234:

more. When I think of electronic calculators I think "calculator" and having the article titled "electronic calculator" feels stuffy. It makes me wonder if there is some regionalism in play (eg soda vs. pop vs. "cold coke"), like maybe only people near where I live call them calculators but people on

1873:

That's a funny example to cite, being mostly an example of how the imprecision we're talking about results in a ridiculous statement: "The first calculator debuted 67 years ago ... a huge upgrade from old mechanical calculators then in use." It's electro-mechanical, and it's not even a calculator in

1789:

says "Titles should match the article contents, and should be neither too narrow nor too broad." Here, "Calculator" is too broad; it was a fine title before all the stuff about mechanical calculators got removed; we could bring all that back, or adjust the title to match the split article contents.

1680:

doesn't take such an absolutist view on things that this kind of heroic effort to avoid the slightest possibility of ambiguity is necessary; it even says: "If the topic of the article is the primary topic (or only topic) for a desired title, then the article can take that title without modification."

431:

OK, to make this more interesting, as I understand it the SAT requires test takers to have a graphing calculator. Presumably some could survive with a non-graphing calculator, but rules are rules. The oldest on the list, last I looked, is the HP28C, which is a graphing calculator from about 1989.

4088:

I just tried to improve the article by adding the mention that there are calculators performing exactly the same functions as all the now historical electronic calculators and those comments were removed. It is relevant to an article titled "Calculator" that the same technology once available only

3845:

I worked on electronic calculators during the mid to late 1970's. This article, like most articles on electronic calculators I have seen leaves out a whole segment of calculator designs. The very early electronic calculator designs used 'counting tubes' and later counting circuits that mimicked the

3409:

The problem I have is that it describes a technology that is not current. X and Y registers and segmented displays? We are not in the 1980's. The bird has grown bigger wings. I agree that expansion by someone who knows the subject and can provide good references is required, but, as it stands I am

3115:

and get on with the question of what it would best be titled. That's where precision comes in. The title guidelines used to say that when you change the scope of an article by a merge or split you should consider retitling it to fit; but I think that went away at some point, even though it makes

1199:

The request at the top of this section says 'Calculator should become a disambiguation page with links to the two halves of the split'. I'm not supporting that. Are you? I'm saying 'calculator' should be a redirect to 'electronic calculator', and the hatnote on 'electronic calculator' should point

4117:

Which section was it in? I can think of arguments either way, depending a little one which section. It could go along with historical discussion, on some of the older models. I believe that there are some that internally execute the same microcode that old models used, but others just emulate the

1980:

Perhaps I am misreading but it looks to like those opposed mention only primary topic not precision. Only supporters mention precision and those in opposition do not rebut it but reassert primary topic. If the main reason for opposition is primary topic, we have either unacknowledged consensus or

1166:

The common usage of the word 'calculator' is undoubtedly to denote an electronic calculator, and it's what most people would type into the search box to find an article, but the requirement for precison suggests that the article should be called 'electronic calculator'. So 'calculator' shoud be a

1089:

per Powers's comments (above and below). "Calculator" is clearly the common name and primary topic. If you're not sure, just do a google search for calculator or ask anyone you know what they think you're referring to when you use the word calculator. In this day and age, electronic is obviously

775:

Computers normally do arithmetic in pure binary. (Fixed or floating point.) It is usual, since just before the time of the integrated circuit based electronic calculator, up though the more recent one that I know about, for calculators to use BCD. That is, they store decimal digits as four bit

3931:

HP25 are available on eBay, but a little expensive. They are usually considered pocket calculators, but when I bought my HP25C for college, my dad suggested I buy the security cradle for it. That keeps it on the desk. Of the available older HP calculators, the 28C and 28S are often reasonably

3394:

Could we leave it in? We're surrounded by so many magical artificats, it would be nice to explain to people just how the little bird inside the box pecks out the answers to our mathematical inquiries. The section needs expansion - the HP Journal used to spend whole issues on the internals of

4332:

I don't know about 8th grade, but many high school classes now require calculators, with the TI-83 being a popular choice. More specifically, a graphing calculator. That allows for visual (graphic) learning for algebra through calculus. As I noted above, for some years now the SAT requires a

660:

You're probably right; we should include a rough guide as to how calculators do their stuff. IMO this can easily be explained in a concise step-by-step text linking calc functionality to the relevant detailed articles on WKP about computers, since calcs is nothing more than specialized digital

447:

Just wondering, any more thoughts on this? Either way is fine to me, but it does seem that newer calculators have enough more features to have a new article. For one, traditional calculators evaluate operations as the go along, where the usual graphing calculator allows one to enter the whole

3771:

Note that the SAT now requires a graphing calculator. It looks like they won't even let you use a non-graphing, new or old, model. They specifically exclude models with an alphanumeric keypad, as that does make it easier to cheat. The ACT is more restrictive, but still allows the more common

510:

One more tidbit ... TI released the four function Datamath (around $ 40) at the same time the SR-50 was released. I have both of these calculators ... do you want photos? I remember the price of the SR-50 to be $ 150, although that may have been a discounted price for TI employees. I don't

1447:

Not crazy, just matching the title to the content. I am surprised there is disagreement about what a calculator is. Any device that can do calculations is a calculator - vernacular usage does not govern content here. A "Calculator" article should encompass all devices that calculate not just

1421:

for the term. No one calls them "electronic calculators" in everyday speech; only if they (for some strange reason) need to distinguish them from mechanical ones do they even mention that they are electronic. It's just assumed, because no one uses mechanical ones anymore. Our article even

492:

The article doesn't mention that TI submitted a patent for the handheld calculator in 1967, which they (as well as the Knowledge article on TI) define as "inventing the handheld calculator". However it seems that the patent application didn't stop other companies from introducing handheld

4089:

on a hand-held device is now available on the web and on mobile devices and now a whole calculator can be built in minutes that uses any conceivable equation on a calculator button. This is very relevant to the evolution of the calculator and I'm not understanding why this was removed?

2986:, and has little to do with PRIMARYTOPIC or PRECISION. Those other issues were relevant to the abandoned move request, but not really to this one. In other words, what do English language reliable sources most frequently refer to this subject as? That is the issue. Does that sound right? 3509:

It could be better, but doesn't seem so far off, for the simplest calculators. Registers are commonly called X and Y in the internal design, though you don't see that in the user documentation. More complicated calculators have more registers, but the basic ideas are still there.

2602:

This sounds like backwards reasoning to me. Yes, I might might not be surprised if an article about electronic calculators would be titled "Calculator", but given an article titled "Calculator", I would expect it to cover mechanical calculator as well, which isn't the case here.

3659:; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Knowledge. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. 1790:

The broader scope would of course not be analogous to trying to cover in one article the various cities called Boston, just because they share a name. Calculators aren't just things sharing a name; they are a set of things broader than what the current article is about.

413:

I suppose it could, but what, more specifically, should be included that isn't here? Should (this is a real question) there also be articles for scientific and business calculators? Is it just the visual aid of graphing calculators that is interesting, or something else?

448:

expression before evaluating it. That is mostly because memory is cheap now, and processors faster. It would also be interesting to mention the symbolic arithmetic that some models now have. (Actually, that goes back to the HP28C, but it caught on slow with others.)

2389:

But it also says that if there's a primary topic for, in this case, "calculator", then there is no need to disambiguate further if "calculator" is also the commonname. This debate, I think, is just about whether "calculator" is the common name for the subject.

558:

This article neglects to mention what people used for calculators before mechanical calculators. I know very little about this area, but it seems as if someone who did could add a section after abacus to talk about using human labour to produce calculations.

3110:

In the language of PRIMARYTOPIC, "Calculator" is the "ambiguous term"; we satisfy PT by making it a redirect; read it; that's why he closed the other one, that said to make it a disambig, so we could all agree that this article is the primary topic for

2632:

This is an encyclopedia, not the Staples catalog. We should cover the whole topic - a couple of paragraphs at least to cover the epic brawling saga of mechanical calculators ( the men who built them...the women who loved them...) before a pointer at

1734:

My point was that (vanishingly) few would be surprised to get an article about electronic calculators when they go to an article with the title "Calculator". IOW, the precision concerns are not an issue; it's ok to leave this article where it is.

3864:

Technogeezer, please start this section. I can help too, as I am highly interested. Please write at least four lines. Then we can extend. I do not know much about calculator design in depth, but many things about digital electronic fundamentals.

3997:, who literally wrote the book on VLSI design, has been working at Caltech since about 1970, and he knows of no calculator called Cal-Tech. He goes pretty far back in the development of integrated circuits, including being credited for naming 4143:

it is fed by, and feeds into, shift registers. The shift registers then recirculate in time with the display multiplexer to keep the display going. This also led to the Intel 4004 as a four bit processor, convenient for doing BCD arithmetic.

3155:

I apologize for the confusion. The core of my position is that "calculator" is CN for all types of calculators, certainly for mechanical and electronic ones. PRECISION suggests we distinguish the types of calculators by their article titles,

2735:

discussion, it really comes down to the question: what do the majority of people call these devices, calculators or electronic calculators? One does not need to be a rocket surgeon to know that the most common name is simply "calculator".

2075:

to move. Having said that, there does appear to be some support for an article about calculators in general. If and when that exists as a significant article, it might be time to revisit this to address the ambiguous nature of the name.

1253:

as long as redirected. It is clearly misleading not to have "electronic" in the title, given the history of the topic. I'm wondering whether "Electronic" should be added to section title "Calculators versus computers". Probably it should.

697:) and then evaluating the expression using an algorithm. If you ever learn how to create a calculator by programming you could get a decent grasp of the different ways to do this, but as I said, it seems beyond the scope of the article. 3595:

fixed some spelling and links in the history section. This is my first time editing. So please don't get all this is my house crazy on me. I have heard a lot about you editors. So please go easy. Thank you very much for your time.

3268:, etc" is quite different. Nobody is arguing that people don't call them "calculators", just that given the adjusted scope of the article, that's not a very good title. If that's the title, then probably we should do a merge from 2238:

Then the other move request should be re-opened. This request does nothing to satisfy any PRIMARYTOPIC concerns. If electronic calculators are not the PRIMARYTOPIC for "calculator" then this proposal here should not be implemented.

2787:

And just the other day I was using a slide rule to calculate the answer to my wife's question as to how much it would cost to re-pave the driveway. The article should talk about all calculators, not just the $ 2.99 bin at Staples.

3130:

I think we're saying the same thing? If we're agreed that the electronic ones are the primary topic then we're just debating here about what to name the article itself. I'm confused because Joja keeps bringing up PRIMARYTOPIC in

562:

Especially of interest may be firing solutions in WWI/WWII-era submarine (I believe the person in charge of that was called a calculator, IANANO), and the scores of women that signed up to become calculators for the war effort.

576:

At some point, the (usually) women were called computers (before the electrical or electromechanical devices), and used, usually, mechanical calculators in their work. I suppose earlier, they would have used pencil and paper.

692:

That is outside the scope of the article in my opinion, especially since different calculators will calculate different ways. One way might be using an interpreter to convert an arithmetic expression into postfix notation

3494:

It gives a very basic understanding about the operation of a simple calculator. Just like they teach you about the 8085 microprocessor, before you learn other mp's or mc's.Maybe the heading of the section can be changed.

2750:

You know, just the blink of an eye ago, when I started working, the fellow round the corner from my office was still using an enormous Olivetti mechanical calculator with rows and rows of buttons on it. Am I that old?

1464:

That's not how our naming conventions work. We title articles by what they are most commonly called. Do you really think "electronic calculators" is more common than "calculators" when referring to these products?

4015:

The CT7001 series digital clock chips were manufactured by a company called Cal-Tex just as the linked spec sheet states. As stated they also made the CT5001 series calculator chips. One seems to be on sale on e-bay

1216:

Chris; the requirement for precision does not require this. It says: "If the topic of the article is the primary topic (or only topic) for a desired title, then the article can take that title without modification."(

1109:- Seems like the obvious primary topic; I don't think that has been disputed. "whether electronic calculator is the primary topic or not is irrelevant"—It's relevant to our guidelines. The place to change those is 1605:

This is exactly what's happening here. See the comments on "going into a Walmart store"; this passing fad of big-box stores selling new-fangled electronical gadgets... where's your "long-term, historical view"?

3978:

The CT7001 is a clock chip from Cal-Tex, the same company that made the CT5001 and CT5005 calculator chips. Note that it is Cal-Tex, and not Cal-Tech. This may or may not be related to the Jack Kilby project.

3716:"Exams are generally not allowed to use calculators including other computable devices. However, some of which may be too difficult to do in mind so such exams may clearly specify that calculators can be used." 153: 1509:). None of those titles are precise enough to be unambiguous, but we use them anyway because COMMONNAME is more important. (Precision also doesn't override PRIMARYTOPIC, which is why we have an article at 1438:... Are any of those things called, specifically, "electronic calculators"? No; it's assumed. Are any of those things not electronic calculators? No; everyone knows "calculator" means an electronic one. 493:

calculators. It seems that the handheld calculator introduced by Canon in 1970 was in partnership with TI. Someday someone who knows the correct story on this stuff should probably add a note about this.

1834:

first and with the current title will think they are at the right spot when they land here. If the title is "Electronic calculator" they will immediately know they have the wrong article and can select the

3255:

Sure, I agree you sound like a broken record. Just because we "can" take the ambiguous term as the title doesn't mean that it's best; yes the electronic calculator can be taken as the "primary topic" for

3787:

Oh, the SAT specifically excludes anything that isn't a calculator, such as laptop, or smart phone. They try to keep people from sneaking questions out, so restrict anything that could make that easier.

4139:

Bit serial logic designs are more common in calculators whereas bit parallel designs dominate general-purpose computers, because a bit serial design minimizes chip complexity, but takes many more clock

3073:

There's a huge difference; computer is now universally understood to mean the machine, not the human, whereas many people still have, know of, collect, or even use calculators that are not electronic.

2666:

But a store isn't a encyclopedia. If I went to a store and asked for a television, I'd expect to be shown some flat-screen TVs. If I decided to lookup the "Televion set", I'd expect it to cover CRTs. —

3480:

Yeah - fair enough - I was in a bit of a grump when posting that last comment. Still not happy with the section as I do not think it really contributes much, but am not hugely motivated to improve it

2575:. The additional precision of this title would be very helpful to the reader: I personally would expect an article titled "calculator" to cover at least mechanical calculators. I'm not even sure if 1448:

contemporary instances. A "Calculator" article should present an overview that covers history as well as present day. This article is only about electronic calculators and should be titled as such.

1966:, these suggest that "electronic calculator" is a good common name for this article's topic, and "calculator" is way too imprecise (even though they do also get called that frequently). Yes? 2679:

Exactly. An article called "Calculator" should describe everything that anyone has called "Calculator", even if only a couple of lines with a see-also reference to a more detailed article. --

320: 3891:

to this article but this article doesn't address the subject of online calculators. Either Online calculator needs its own article or else there needs to be a section on the subject here.

2614:

I think you may be in the minority there. Certainly the average person would be caught off guard if they went into a store, asked to see the calculators, and was asked "what do you mean,

2915:

would be a better title choice since most readers entering the term "calculator" will be looking for an article about electronic calculators, not an overview of all kinds of calculators.

1890:

If we are to take this video as evidence for usage, it argues for the Electronic calculator title. The first words out of the narrator's mouth and the first text in that video is "FIRST

1552:"Recentism" usually refers to a bias toward events of the last couple of years, not the last couple of decades. Electronic calculators have been around long enough to have become the 4552: 2008:

to rebut the precision argument. "Primary topic" is a reason to oppose "Calculator should become a disambiguation page"; I don't know what you are saying about "undisclosed reasons"?

4308:

blockheads around the world. And calculators are getting more smarter, but students are getting dumber. Today's students cannot use a 1 line scientific calculator from the 1990s.

3438:

Fair point, but you would need to back it up with some evidence that the Christmas Cracker calculators use the same processor architecture as say a 1980 TI 4 function calculator.

1294:, it would seem totally logical that the article about its electronic counterpart should occupy the relevant namespace, rather than squatting at an ambiguous and generic title. -- 2152: 909: 1826:

The reason I support Dicklyon's proposal for a redirect to here from "Calculator" is that it will minimize search time and be unlikely to confuse readers. Someone looking for

1413:

This is crazy. If you go to Wal-Mart and ask "Where are the calculators?", they're going to show you the little push-button electronic doo-dads. "Calculator" is clearly the

3235:

the east coast or in some other english speaking country always call them "electronic calculators". "Students, please put your electronic calculators away for the test now."

2593:, no matter how many times you restart the discussion. Simply "calculator" is the common name for electronic calculators, and what readers will expect to see as the title. 3955:

and has references that don't seem to reference the name. Is there anything that shows that name? I do remember some calculator chips, such as the CT5001, that were named

670:

I agree, there should be information about how the calculator chips and circuitry work and stuff. Could someone look into it? There's no information elsewhere.-someone else

3214:

says "If the topic of the article is the primary topic (or only topic) for a desired title, then the article can take that title without modification." So, per COMMONNAME:

710:

While some calculators might be built around computers, the first calculators certainly were not: they were built using simple boolean logic, without any programmability.

3959:

which I always thought was a combination of California and Texas, but might have been something else. More specifically, I am wondering if the name is at all related to

1676:.) I don't think "calculator" is a term that is going to mislead anyone, people aren't generally going to be surprised to see just electronic calculators described here. 1585:. It's designed to avoid fluctuation brought on by increased coverage and interest due to news events or other transient conditions. That is not what is happening here. 2301:

term used to denote any calculator whatever type it is. It is the common name of a class of devices of which the electronic version is only one example. "Calculator:

3286:

No, the split was a good idea. I really think you're overestimating the number of people who will be confused by not finding mechanical calculators at this title.

147: 4542: 4249: 4245: 4231: 4557: 867:

should become a disambiguation page with links to the two halves of the split. I can do all the moves etc if someone would unprotect Electronic calculator.

386:

has been a re-direct to calculator for nearly a year. Can we start a discussion about whether graphing calculators are ready yet to have their own article??

3317:

is equally "stuffy" but it is necessary for precision. This is an encyclopedia where accuracy is primary, not marketing literature aimed at reader buy-in.

2811:

per ErikHaugen in the previous move discussion. Electronic calculators are clearly the primary topic of "calculator" a hat on the page would be sufficient.

204: 2492:

and the common name is "calculator": that is just the word people use today to refer to handheld (or sometimes desktop) electronic calculating machines.--

2028:

The updated proposal is to have Calculator be a redirect to Electronic calculator. Can you support that? Should we start over to clear up that confusion?

4567: 4422:. Is this meant to suggest that the availability of the 4004 led to more pocket-sized devices? (As far as I remember, Busicom build desk calculators.) 3737:

I took it out; it was unparseable and appeared to (be trying to) say "Some do and some don't", which really isn't an encyclopediac observation. And even

539:

Just read an article where the db800 by Digitron was described as the first European pocket calculator. Should it be mentioned in the History section? --

310: 79: 1482:– titles are expected to use names and terms that are precise, but only as precise as is necessary to identify the topic of the article unambiguously." 4333:

graphing calculator for test takers. (No non-graphing calculators are on the list.) Yes students should learn basic arithmetic without calculators.

4537: 4017: 364:

This article is supposed to be about electronic calculators. There is another article for mechanical calculators, where earlier history should go.

4547: 673: 729:

Basically, it suggests that calculators convert operations (at least addition) into binary notation, do the calculation then convert it back to

4105: 2480:

the primary topic). As for precision that is only needed if the title is ambiguous, so readers have trouble finding the article; and again if

286: 4562: 3917: 85: 3222:, etc. Why does precision matter so much more in this case than it does in all those other cases? Nobody is going to be confused, wondering 1839:

hat tag. Those looking for electronic calculator will know right away that they are at the right spot so there would be no confusion there.

2499: 4158:

One of the earliest electronic calculators, the Friden 130, used a particular bit-serial logic, not a BCD-serial arithmetic design. See:

2880:, for example. The current division of material between the two articles is artificial and dare I say unencyclopedic; An abacus is not a 2637:, then we can spend the rest of the article on the usual flabby Knowledge minutia catalog of boring things found in a Staples catalog.-- 1167:

redirect to 'electronic calculator', with a hatnote there to redirect the rare reader who wants to know about other types of calculator.

4486: 4420:

Pocket-sized devices became available in the 1970s, especially after the Intel 4004, the first microprocessor, was developed by Intel...

4175:

Interesting machine. It uses decimal (0 to 9 pulses per digit) stored in a delay line, instead of BCD, and counters instead of adders.

3612: 3545: 2303:

calculator or calculating machine, device for performing numerical computations; it may be mechanical, electromechanical, or electronic.

677: 651: 4025: 3722: 977:- Knowledge policy requires the title to match the contents. This article is not about calculators. It is only about electronic ones. 616: 44: 4227:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

277: 238: 3698: 3245: 3145: 3100: 2996: 2843: 2400: 2346: 2249: 2206: 2018: 1745: 1691: 1630: 1595: 1238: 1151: 1123: 1074: 635:

This article should include how calculators actually work. I haven't been able to find out how they do anywhere on the internet.

4532: 526: 99: 30: 1640:

Electronic calculators are "new-fangled"? This is like the mirror-universe version of 'recentism' - 'ancientism', perhaps?

104: 20: 3060: 2440: 2276: 1350: 960:- if we're going to have "mechanical calculator" split off, then this article should be called "electronic calculator". -- 74: 3685: 3639: 168: 4292: 2293:

Sorry, I revise my too-hasty response. PRIMARYTOPIC is not an issue (the redirect satisfies PRIMARYTOPIC) but PRECISION

213: 3348:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

2067:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

135: 3694: 2765:

Yes, you are; face it; me, too. But it's still "recentism" to ignore that. And this move to turn everything over to

1755:

The precision is not about who would be astonished. It's about being more precise about what the article content is.

1710:

works for me. It blends common expectations and sufficient precision. As you say, few would be surprised to end up at

1620:"This is exactly what's happening here." You think the decline of the mechanical calculator is a transient condition? 798:

This article is only about electronic calculators. It is not about all calculators. Why does it have the wrong title?

65: 3559:

Clear and Clear Entry? How is this mystifying? Or is it just not explained in modern calculator manuals any more? --

2371:, the article on that topic", so that's easily satisfied if this article is the primary topic for the ambiguous term 725:

I strongly suggest we add a "How (pocket) calculators work" to the article. I found an interesting explanation here:

3466:

You don't need to back it up if you don't claim it. Just report what we find sources on; and report their dates.

1514: 4364: 3816: 2221:

in question. I think that's why we have this proposal and why most respondents supported it the first time around.

472:. An article on scientific calculator, which now usually means graphing calculator, would still be interesting. 3910:

Are there any current basic desktop calculators using RPN? If not, is it possible to obtain an HP25 calculator?

1786: 1556:

standard, and there's no reason not to take readers directly to that article when they search for "calculator".

4248:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

4217: 4101: 3260:, but it's far from the only topic, and greater precision here just makes a lot more sense. The situation for " 3921: 3544:

Is there any discussion about the mystifyingly named "C" and "CE" keys on most English language labeled calcs?

2156: 1673: 1205: 1172: 1110: 913: 809: 739: 1915:

I count 8 in support and 4 opposed, not a consensus. Would it make sense to open this to the wider community?

1133:

Hmm - Dicklyon, I see what you mean here now; pardon. The proposal here is to create a disambiguation page at

757:

I have included a basic explanation of the internal working, and as for the details, someone can expand. Also

511:

remember hearing about the SR-10 ... which puzzles me as I worked at TI from 1972-1974. eisenbeis, 8 Dec 07.

3608: 2868:

On such an important topic, and in which so many are so interested, shouldn't we have an overview article at

2634: 2515:. The majority of the article's sources refer to the item simply as a 'calculator'. Even the source titled 1874:

the sense that this article means; probably they meant first "computer", though that's also very imprecise.

1370:. The majority of the article's sources refer to the item simply as a 'calculator'. Even the source titled 681: 647: 4490: 4452: 4283: 4209: 4029: 3896: 3726: 3549: 1436: 758: 694: 129: 109: 2544:

That what I would do here, too: narrow the scope in the title, so you can usually just say "calculator".

1715: 544: 4205: 3851: 3684:

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant

3012: 2457: 2364: 2169: 1947: 1326: 1137:. But even the redirect is problematic, because people call electronic calculators "calculator"; it's the 1051: 4021: 522: 4267:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

4255: 4097: 3746: 3604: 3564: 3500: 3457: 3400: 3364: 3314: 3269: 3165: 3161: 3157: 2908: 2877: 2830: 2793: 2756: 2719: 2684: 2642: 2485: 2473: 2416: 2360: 2094: 2081: 1963: 1836: 1827: 1769: 1711: 1707: 1661: 1334: 1300: 1291: 1043: 1035: 1031: 1027: 965: 860: 856: 820: 816: 766: 698: 643: 219: 4208:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3847: 2944: 387: 263: 125: 4056: 2133:

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with

890:

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with

540: 4322: 4093: 3913: 3870: 3756: 3719:

That could do with being rewritten, or even deleted as it appears to be only anecdotal information.

3600: 3241: 3189: 3141: 3096: 3090:

Then again, Joja, you should re-open the other request. If there's no PT, then this move is no good.

2992: 2983: 2839: 2766: 2512: 2489: 2415:: It's just common sense, people mean electronic calculator when they say "calculator". A hatnote to 2396: 2342: 2333: 2245: 2202: 2014: 1959: 1741: 1687: 1665: 1626: 1591: 1367: 1330: 1234: 1147: 1138: 1119: 1070: 1061: 639: 514: 2579:

should be a redirect here, an overview article or disambiguation page might seem more appropriate. —

1565:

In this case, "long-term, historical view" applies to recent decades (and centuries) just as well.

1060:

Note that this is not what is being proposed. However, I don't think it's really debatable that the

518: 190: 3485: 3443: 3415: 3384: 3323: 3211: 3174: 3040: 3025: 3016: 2967: 2921: 2494: 2461: 2315: 2228: 2186: 2177: 2116: 2034: 1994: 1921: 1904: 1845: 1724: 1677: 1669: 1582: 1535: 1454: 1217: 1201: 1168: 1005: 983: 873: 804: 745: 726: 469: 465: 161: 55: 4399:

which doesn't make sense. Floating point or fixed point can be decimal, binary, or any other base.

2196:

PRECISION isn't too much of an issue unless PRIMARYTOPIC is in question, and I don't think it is.

661:

computers. That is; if you know the fundamentals of computers, you actually know calcs as well. --

285:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

175: 3892: 3471: 3429: 3300: 3277: 3201: 3121: 3079: 2778: 2549: 2419:

is sufficient. Like ErikHaugan said, PRECISION isn't an issue unless PRIMARYTOPIC is in question—

2380: 1971: 1937: 1879: 1795: 1760: 1611: 1570: 1543: 1314: 1190: 948: 832: 269: 70: 4252:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

566:

Unfortunately, I know very little about this. Not even enough to make a heading with a stub. --

253: 232: 4268: 3861:

Please, by all means add in a section for these. I can help you structure it if you need help.

4476:

This technology was to provide a stepping stone to the development of electronic calculators.

3888: 3643: 3193: 3052: 2952: 2893: 2741: 2564: 2522: 2432: 2268: 1510: 1377: 1342: 1095: 1047: 859:— Calculator page has been split into mechanical calculator and electronic calculator but the 613: 432:

It does seem, then, that the graphing feature is more fundamental than I might have thought.

51: 1485:

I'm not ignoring it. Precision doesn't override COMMONNAME. That's why we have articles at

4513: 4166: 3742: 3560: 3496: 3453: 3396: 3360: 2789: 2752: 2715: 2680: 2638: 2568: 2077: 1863:-- yet more evidence that "calculator" is the common name for the subject of this article. 1804: 1498: 1295: 961: 762: 711: 358: 4275: 4309: 3866: 3578: 3236: 3136: 3091: 2987: 2834: 2816: 2627: 2391: 2337: 2240: 2197: 2009: 1955: 1736: 1682: 1621: 1586: 1506: 1490: 1475: 1262: 1229: 1142: 1114: 1065: 3424:

More recentism problems? I bet the cheapest calculators still work about the same way.

2693:

An article called "London" should describe every city that anyone has called "London".

2176:

will immediately serve readers who search for that term and it addresses concerns about

141: 4427: 4404: 4338: 4234:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 4180: 4148: 4123: 4006: 3984: 3968: 3937: 3793: 3777: 3664: 3515: 3481: 3439: 3411: 3380: 3318: 3169: 3044: 3020: 2962: 2940: 2916: 2668: 2605: 2581: 2488:

it's just as precise or imprecise as before. The only policy I can see that applies is

2310: 2223: 2181: 2111: 2029: 1989: 1916: 1899: 1840: 1719: 1449: 1000: 978: 868: 799: 781: 735: 610:

Rise of the Rocket Girls: The Women Who Propelled Us, from Missiles to the Moon to Mars

582: 477: 453: 437: 419: 407: 369: 4274:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3395:

calculators, back before they became fixated on producing doomeed iPad competitors. --

1046:

until an appropriate overall historical article (and not just a disambig) is created.

406:

link. Edit that page, taking out the #REDIRECT line. Add long, informative article ..

4526: 3760: 3671: 3467: 3425: 3296: 3287: 3273: 3197: 3117: 3075: 3008: 2774: 2732: 2694: 2656: 2619: 2594: 2545: 2376: 1967: 1933: 1875: 1864: 1860: 1812: 1791: 1777: 1756: 1641: 1607: 1566: 1557: 1539: 1518: 1466: 1439: 1427: 1311: 1277: 1225: 1186: 995: 944: 930: 828: 567: 4159: 2306: 1272:

How is it misleading? Is it misleading to not have ", England" in the title of our

3998: 3048: 2982:

My understanding of our naming guidelines is that this question here boils down to

2948: 2889: 2770: 2737: 2428: 2424: 2264: 1338: 1091: 824: 662: 502: 349:

We need information on history of calculators, early mechanical calculators, etc...

1220:) I'm ready to change my !vote if someone can explain how this is different than 4509: 4241: 4162: 3994: 2872:

rather than a redirect? This would then remove the need to have material on the

2359:– the current name is too imprecise, since the mechanical part was split out to 494: 282: 3678: 3410:

not convinced that it is a useful explaination of how a modern calculator works

1772:

is more precise about what the article content is, but the article is still at

4240:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 4201: 3632: 3574: 3359:

I think there should be a separate page for the history of pocket calculators.

3265: 3231: 3225: 3219: 2826: 2812: 2576: 2481: 2469: 2372: 2260: 2090: 1954:

a redirect to here; so those can be discounted. The remaining issue is about

1951: 1831: 1808: 1703: 1657: 1494: 1255: 1134: 1039: 1023: 926: 864: 852: 259: 24: 4218:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110720142104/http://www.spingal.plus.com/micro/

3667:

then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)

2651:

That's a question of scope, not of article title. If you want to change the

2097:— I apologize for starting over but we want to be clear about the proposal: 1038:

than the others. A rename seems appropriate, with a temporary redirect from

4423: 4400: 4334: 4176: 4144: 4119: 4002: 3980: 3964: 3933: 3789: 3773: 3691:

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image

3511: 3313:

Mechanical calculators also are commonly called "calculators". The name for

3295:

Since my remarks weren't based on an estimated number, that seems unlikely.

3035:

What is the difference between this request and somebody suggesting we move

2367:

says "If a primary topic exists, the ambiguous term should be the title of,

2263:

should be a disambiguation page. Either way this move request should fail. –

2259:

This is true. If there is no primary topic (which I strongly dispute), then

1807:

is more precise about the scope of the article, but the article is still at

777: 578: 473: 449: 433: 415: 365: 2911:

should suffice. If there is a need for an overview of calculators, I think

2468:

the primary topic for calculator, so there's no need to change it (and if

3036: 2572: 759:

http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/gadgets/other-gadgets/calculator.htm

3960: 730: 2563:

I find the CN/PT arguments unconvincing: by that logic we should move

3738: 3261: 3215: 2936: 2904: 2873: 2420: 1894:

CALCULATOR" (my emphasis). Throughout, it refers to the device as an

1861:"The first calculator debuted 67 years ago -- and weighed five tons." 1773: 1502: 1486: 1273: 1221: 4482:

This technology presaged the development of electronic calculators.

4221: 2363:. Titles should be precise enough to reasonably define the topic. 2061:

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal.

1664:, this discussion seems to center around balancing conciseness (and 2517: 1372: 4517: 4494: 4431: 4408: 4342: 4326: 4297: 4184: 4170: 4152: 4127: 4109: 4033: 4010: 3988: 3972: 3941: 3925: 3900: 3874: 3855: 3797: 3781: 3763: 3750: 3730: 3702: 3616: 3582: 3568: 3553: 3519: 3504: 3489: 3475: 3461: 3447: 3433: 3419: 3404: 3388: 3368: 3342:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.

3328: 3304: 3290: 3281: 3250: 3205: 3192:, that's a nastiness that was inflicted on us by Born2cycle. See 3179: 3150: 3125: 3105: 3083: 3068: 3030: 3001: 2972: 2956: 2926: 2897: 2848: 2820: 2797: 2782: 2760: 2745: 2723: 2697: 2688: 2672: 2659: 2646: 2622: 2609: 2597: 2585: 2553: 2539: 2503: 2448: 2405: 2384: 2351: 2320: 2284: 2254: 2233: 2211: 2191: 2121: 2085: 2039: 2023: 1999: 1975: 1941: 1926: 1909: 1883: 1867: 1850: 1815: 1799: 1780: 1764: 1750: 1729: 1696: 1644: 1635: 1615: 1600: 1574: 1560: 1547: 1521: 1469: 1459: 1442: 1430: 1394: 1358: 1317: 1302: 1280: 1267: 1243: 1209: 1194: 1176: 1156: 1128: 1099: 1079: 1055: 1010: 988: 969: 952: 933: 878: 836: 823:

appears to be protected, so you'd need to do a move request. See

785: 770: 751: 714: 701: 685: 665: 586: 570: 548: 530: 505: 481: 457: 441: 423: 373: 4118:

external appearance. How about an article on calculator history?

1718:

article we can stick a hat tag for it here or revisit the issue.

3272:

to restore the expected connection between title and contents.

1932:

Sure, can you find a place to announce it to a wider audience?

1296: 727:

http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/2001-03/984867136.Cs.r.html

1785:

Yes it is, and I don't think anyone would object to that. But

1224:

not needing a ", England" disambiguator to distinguish it from

4440: 2935:

is an interesting suggestion. I think it would be a new idea;

184: 15: 2833:, so this concern will be addressed if it succeeds, I think. 2939:

for example describes all sorts of cameras, and the modern

2655:

of the article, a requested move is not the way to do it.

4212:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

3677:

If the image has already been deleted you may want to try

3230:

If you want to demote commonname, then, fine, I just like

2423:

meant something else before 2007 but we don't redirect to

815:

The content got split in January, making a new article in

793: 3624:

File:Casio as-a ckt1 1c.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

1426:

they could possibly compete for primary topic status.

160: 3452:

Fine,but can anyone read the Chinese literature? --

2521:

chiefly uses just 'calculator'. A hatnote suffices.

2180:

since the title will accurately describe the topic.

1376:

chiefly uses just 'calculator'. A hatnote suffices.

794:

Why isn't this article titled electronic calculator?

281:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 4244:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 3670:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 2903:I agree about abacus and mechanical calulator. The 2155:, please explain your reasons, taking into account 1064:for electronic calculators is "calculator", is it? 912:, please explain your reasons, taking into account 3047:? I think we just need to use common sense here. – 2907:article is sufficient in itself and a hat note at 2518:The History of the Hand-Held Electronic Calculator 1373:The History of the Hand-Held Electronic Calculator 1702:I am not wedded to my original proposal. Having 819:. But nobody has moved this one. The redirect 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 4508:"Presaged" usually has a negative connotation. 4397:BCD rather than a floating-point representation 4390:BCD rather than a floating-point representation 2947:article. Is there a better parallel, I wonder? 1787:Knowledge:Manual_of_Style#Article_titles.5BR.5D 4553:Knowledge level-4 vital articles in Technology 4437:Semi-protected edit request on 12 October 2023 4230:This message was posted before February 2018. 3573:Manuals!? Who do you know that reads manuals? 2307:The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition, 2008 3196:. I don't buy it; Precision still matters. 1422:specifically calls them "obsolete". There's 174: 8: 3712:Line in education section is poorly written. 3642:, has been nominated for speedy deletion at 2629:You can't fight here...this is the War Room! 2456:. The proposer has not explained why either 1946:Several of the opposes were on the basis of 2714:No. Do I have to explain the difference? -- 721:How does a modern calculator actually work? 4200:I have just modified one external link on 3911: 3224:where's the section about Babbage here on 2153:polling is not a substitute for discussion 1022:We have clear justification for topics of 910:polling is not a substitute for discussion 227: 3164:. PT suggests we use CN as a redirect to 3116:perfect sense and ought to be done here. 2168:- This proposal addresses concerns about 925:. This is clearly the primary topic for 3841:Early designs for electronic calculators 3686:image page (File:Casio as-a ckt1 1c.jpg) 2825:Well, this move request would result in 4356: 4048: 3808: 2943:is a more detailed article. There's no 2336:for this subject is just "calculator". 600: 229: 188: 4543:Knowledge vital articles in Technology 3355:Please maintain optimum article length 1200:people to the existing disambig page. 1034:. As it stands, this is closer to the 1950:, which is easy to satisfy by making 1435:Look at this Google Shopping search: 345:Moved this comment from the article: 7: 4558:B-Class vital articles in Technology 4473:Please reduce wordiness by changing 2884:as normally understood, but it is a 2769:as if it were the only criterion in 2157:Knowledge's policy on article titles 914:Knowledge's policy on article titles 275:This article is within the scope of 3674:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 2297:an issue because "calculator" is a 1417:for them, and they are clearly the 218:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 14: 4568:Mid-priority mathematics articles 4369:collegereadiness.collegeboard.org 4222:http://www.spingal.plus.com/micro 4204:. Please take a moment to review 3821:collegereadiness.collegeboard.org 3210:I feel like a broken record, but 1325:. Electronic calculators are the 541:Killing time, till it retaliates. 357:articles on the talk pages. :^) — 295:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 4538:Knowledge level-4 vital articles 4500: 4444: 4084:Current Knowledge of Calculators 3631: 1181:That's what we mean when we say 298:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 262: 252: 231: 198: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 3638:An image used in this article, 1581:This really isn't the point of 1329:and simply "calculator" is the 315:This article has been rated as 4548:B-Class level-4 vital articles 4185:04:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC) 4171:21:30, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 3188:As for it just coming down to 3043:because of its ambiguity with 2773:is what mainly bugs me here. 1: 4153:19:13, 8 September 2016 (UTC) 4024:for front page of catalogue. 3926:04:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC) 3764:16:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 3751:15:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 3741:knows that "Math is Hard". -- 3731:11:07, 13 December 2012 (UTC) 3703:20:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 3505:15:57, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 2145:, then sign your comment with 1515:One Day at a Time (TV series) 902:, then sign your comment with 702:20:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC) 374:18:59, 8 September 2016 (UTC) 289:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 4563:B-Class mathematics articles 4518:06:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 4495:02:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC) 4327:01:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC) 4298:18:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC) 4034:17:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC) 4011:22:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC) 3901:13:51, 5 November 2015 (UTC) 3617:20:07, 2 December 2011 (UTC) 2618:electronic or mechanical?" 531:14:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 482:02:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC) 458:02:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC) 4467:to reactivate your request. 4455:has been answered. Set the 4432:19:57, 12 August 2022 (UTC) 4128:01:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC) 3973:20:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC) 3942:00:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC) 3798:00:58, 26 August 2016 (UTC) 3782:00:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC) 3640:File:Casio as-a ckt1 1c.jpg 3583:21:30, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 3569:18:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 3554:17:38, 4 October 2011 (UTC) 3520:07:27, 5 October 2017 (UTC) 3490:21:21, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 3476:20:01, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 3462:15:42, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 3448:00:33, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 3434:00:23, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 3420:00:19, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 3405:14:26, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 3389:12:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 3369:14:01, 21 August 2011 (UTC) 3329:17:47, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 3305:00:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 3291:23:19, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 3282:21:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 3251:16:40, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 3206:06:43, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 3180:03:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 3151:16:40, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 3126:06:40, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 3106:04:51, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 3084:00:39, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 3069:00:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 3031:00:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 3002:22:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2973:04:23, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 2961:Good point. Good parallel. 2957:04:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 2927:21:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2898:21:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2849:21:17, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 2821:20:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 2798:20:01, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 2783:16:46, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 2761:16:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 2746:16:08, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 2724:14:32, 14 August 2011 (UTC) 2698:12:59, 14 August 2011 (UTC) 2689:15:27, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 2673:09:01, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 2660:21:41, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 2647:15:26, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 2623:15:18, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 2610:14:27, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 2598:13:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 2586:09:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 2554:01:38, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 2540:01:11, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 2504:00:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 2449:23:49, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2406:23:37, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2385:23:21, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2352:22:09, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2321:03:58, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 2285:23:55, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2255:23:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2234:22:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2212:22:09, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2192:21:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2122:21:21, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2086:19:07, 18 August 2011 (UTC) 2040:01:24, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 2024:23:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 2000:23:08, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 1976:21:56, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 1942:21:56, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 1927:21:42, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 1910:03:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 1884:02:16, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 1851:21:56, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 1395:20:51, 11 August 2011 (UTC) 786:20:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC) 771:13:28, 21 August 2011 (UTC) 686:03:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 666:13:09, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 571:13:23, 13 August 2005 (UTC) 442:22:38, 8 January 2017 (UTC) 424:01:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC) 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 4584: 4409:04:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC) 4261:(last update: 5 June 2024) 4197:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 4110:20:32, 18 March 2014 (UTC) 3989:21:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC) 3951:The article mentions the: 3883:Online calculator redirect 3679:Commons Undeletion Request 3646:for the following reason: 1868:16:34, 5 August 2011 (UTC) 1816:17:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 1800:05:54, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 1781:20:46, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 1765:20:22, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 1751:21:08, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1730:21:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1697:18:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1645:18:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1636:18:29, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1616:17:55, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1601:17:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1575:15:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1561:15:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1548:03:42, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1522:18:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1470:15:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1460:01:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1443:20:18, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 1431:20:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 1359:19:43, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 1318:01:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 1303:09:59, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 1281:12:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 1268:01:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 1244:19:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 1210:17:50, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 1195:17:52, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1177:17:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1157:18:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1129:17:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1100:22:04, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 1080:17:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1056:21:59, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 1011:04:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 989:18:23, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 970:17:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 953:17:04, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 934:16:59, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 879:12:19, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 837:03:47, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 810:02:11, 1 August 2011 (UTC) 506:21:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC) 4343:08:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC) 3932:priced, and fun to use. 3887:There is a redirect from 3875:17:22, 30 June 2013 (UTC) 3856:02:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC) 1290:. As we have the article 863:(redirect) is protected. 715:21:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 587:19:58, 6 April 2019 (UTC) 549:18:04, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 464:I just added a link from 314: 247: 226: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 3345:Please do not modify it. 3194:WT:AT#Whence COMMONNAME? 3019:are important concerns. 2863:Any additional comments: 2375:, as we seem to agree. 2172:since the redirect from 2064:Please do not modify it. 1988:reasons for opposition. 1407:Any additional comments: 752:12:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC) 497:11:30, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC) 410:11:42, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC) 390:17:15, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC) 361:19:08, 7 Oct 2003 (UTC) 321:project's priority scale 4193:External links modified 2635:Calculator (mechanical) 2511:as 'calculator' is the 1366:as 'calculator' is the 695:Reverse_Polish_notation 654:) 20:06, 1 October 2005 278:WikiProject Mathematics 4533:B-Class vital articles 3695:CommonsNotificationBot 3379:been recently edited. 2731:. As this is simply a 2472:becomes a redirect to 1958:'s "precision" versus 817:mechanical calculators 351: 75:avoid personal attacks 4064:www.waynekirkwood.com 3315:mechanical calculator 3270:mechanical calculator 3166:Electronic calculator 3162:Electronic calculator 3158:Mechanical calculator 2933:Calculator (overview) 2913:Calculator (overview) 2909:Mechanical calculator 2882:mechanical calculator 2878:mechanical calculator 2831:electronic calculator 2486:Electronic calculator 2474:Electronic calculator 2417:mechanical calculator 2361:Mechanical calculator 2103:Electronic calculator 2095:Electronic calculator 1964:mechanical calculator 1837:Mechanical calculator 1828:Mechanical calculator 1770:Boston, Massachusetts 1716:Calculator (overview) 1712:Electronic calculator 1708:Electronic calculator 1662:Electronic calculator 1656:Assuming we redirect 1335:Mechanical calculator 1292:Mechanical calculator 1044:electronic calculator 1036:electronic calculator 1032:electronic calculator 1028:mechanical calculator 861:Electronic calculator 857:Electronic calculator 821:electronic calculator 676:comment was added by 353:Please make comments 347: 205:level-4 vital article 100:Neutral point of view 4242:regular verification 3953:"Cal-Tech" project, 3757:Math class is tough! 3648:Copyright violations 2101:Rename this article 1714:. If we ever want a 631:How calculators work 301:mathematics articles 105:No original research 4365:"Calculator Policy" 4232:After February 2018 3817:"Calculator Policy" 3041:electronic computer 3007:"Calculator" is an 2616:African or European 470:Mortgage calculator 466:Business calculator 398:. Find yourself at 396:Graphing calculator 384:Graphing calculator 379:Graphing calculator 4418:The article says: 4286:InternetArchiveBot 4237:InternetArchiveBot 3672:fair use rationale 3011:term. That is why 612:. Back Bay Books. 501:Information added 270:Mathematics portal 214:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 4471: 4470: 4395:The article says 4262: 4113: 4096:comment added by 3928: 3916:comment added by 3889:Online calculator 3709: 3708: 3652:What should I do? 3644:Wikimedia Commons 3620: 3603:comment added by 3249: 3149: 3104: 3000: 2945:camera (overview) 2847: 2565:personal computer 2497: 2484:is a redirect to 2404: 2350: 2253: 2210: 2054:Requested move II 2022: 1830:is likely to try 1749: 1695: 1674:WP:NAMINGCRITERIA 1634: 1599: 1511:One Day at a Time 1310:as per Dicklyon. 1242: 1155: 1127: 1078: 689: 656: 642:comment added by 554:Human Calculators 533: 517:comment added by 335: 334: 331: 330: 327: 326: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 4575: 4504: 4503: 4462: 4458: 4448: 4447: 4441: 4381: 4380: 4378: 4376: 4361: 4319: 4314: 4296: 4287: 4260: 4259: 4238: 4112: 4098:Michael Bartmess 4090: 4076: 4075: 4073: 4071: 4061: 4053: 3833: 3832: 3830: 3828: 3813: 3663:If the image is 3635: 3628: 3627: 3619: 3597: 3591:Very minor edits 3374:Internal Working 3347: 3326: 3321: 3239: 3177: 3172: 3139: 3094: 3065: 3057: 3028: 3023: 2990: 2970: 2965: 2924: 2919: 2837: 2569:desktop computer 2537: 2493: 2445: 2437: 2394: 2340: 2318: 2313: 2281: 2273: 2243: 2231: 2226: 2217:PRIMARYTOPIC is 2200: 2189: 2184: 2149: 2143: 2137: 2119: 2114: 2066: 2037: 2032: 2012: 2004:I at least have 1997: 1992: 1924: 1919: 1907: 1902: 1848: 1843: 1805:Human psychology 1739: 1727: 1722: 1685: 1624: 1589: 1499:Human psychology 1474:You're ignoring 1457: 1452: 1392: 1355: 1347: 1337:is sufficient. – 1298: 1265: 1260: 1232: 1145: 1117: 1068: 1008: 1003: 994:I can live with 986: 981: 906: 900: 894: 876: 871: 848:Requested move I 843:Requested move I 807: 802: 748: 742: 671: 655: 636: 623: 622: 608:Holt, Nathalia. 605: 512: 303: 302: 299: 296: 293: 272: 267: 266: 256: 249: 248: 243: 235: 228: 211: 202: 201: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 4583: 4582: 4578: 4577: 4576: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4523: 4522: 4501: 4483: 4477: 4460: 4456: 4445: 4439: 4416: 4393: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4374: 4372: 4371:. College Board 4363: 4362: 4358: 4315: 4310: 4305: 4290: 4285: 4253: 4246:have permission 4236: 4210:this simple FaQ 4195: 4136: 4091: 4086: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4069: 4067: 4059: 4055: 4054: 4050: 3949: 3918:101.186.160.111 3908: 3906:RPN calculators 3885: 3843: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3826: 3824: 3823:. College Board 3815: 3814: 3810: 3714: 3626: 3598: 3593: 3542: 3376: 3357: 3352: 3343: 3324: 3319: 3175: 3170: 3064: 3061: 3056: 3053: 3026: 3021: 3013:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 2968: 2963: 2922: 2917: 2859: 2829:redirecting to 2533: 2529: 2523: 2502: 2458:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 2444: 2441: 2436: 2433: 2365:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 2316: 2311: 2280: 2277: 2272: 2269: 2229: 2224: 2187: 2182: 2170:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 2147: 2141: 2135: 2129: 2117: 2112: 2109:redirect to it. 2062: 2056: 2051: 2050: 2035: 2030: 1995: 1990: 1948:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1922: 1917: 1905: 1900: 1846: 1841: 1725: 1720: 1507:Laptop computer 1491:London, England 1455: 1450: 1403: 1388: 1384: 1378: 1354: 1351: 1346: 1343: 1333:. A hatnote to 1327:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1263: 1256: 1006: 1001: 984: 979: 923:Strongly oppose 904: 898: 892: 886: 874: 869: 850: 844: 805: 800: 796: 746: 740: 723: 672:—The preceding 637: 633: 628: 627: 626: 619: 607: 606: 602: 556: 490: 404:redirected from 402:. Click on the 381: 343: 341:Article Comment 300: 297: 294: 291: 290: 268: 261: 241: 212:on Knowledge's 209: 199: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 4581: 4579: 4571: 4570: 4565: 4560: 4555: 4550: 4545: 4540: 4535: 4525: 4524: 4521: 4520: 4481: 4475: 4469: 4468: 4449: 4438: 4435: 4415: 4412: 4392: 4387: 4383: 4382: 4355: 4354: 4350: 4348: 4346: 4345: 4304: 4301: 4280: 4279: 4272: 4225: 4224: 4216:Added archive 4194: 4191: 4190: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4135: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4085: 4082: 4078: 4077: 4047: 4046: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4036: 3948: 3945: 3907: 3904: 3884: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3842: 3839: 3835: 3834: 3807: 3806: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3713: 3710: 3707: 3706: 3682: 3681: 3675: 3668: 3654: 3653: 3636: 3625: 3622: 3592: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3541: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3464: 3375: 3372: 3356: 3353: 3351: 3350: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3062: 3054: 3045:human computer 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2941:digital camera 2866: 2865: 2858: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2726: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2588: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2531: 2527: 2506: 2498: 2495:JohnBlackburne 2464:are relevant. 2451: 2442: 2434: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2369:or redirect to 2354: 2332:- I think the 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2278: 2270: 2162: 2161: 2136:*'''Support''' 2128: 2125: 2070: 2069: 2057: 2055: 2052: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 1944: 1913: 1912: 1887: 1886: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1638: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1445: 1410: 1409: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1386: 1382: 1361: 1352: 1344: 1320: 1305: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1202:Colonies Chris 1185:; read mine. 1169:Colonies Chris 1161: 1160: 1159: 1103: 1102: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 972: 955: 937: 936: 919: 918: 893:*'''Support''' 885: 882: 849: 846: 845: 842: 841: 840: 839: 795: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 722: 719: 718: 717: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 632: 629: 625: 624: 618:978-0316338905 617: 599: 598: 594: 592: 590: 589: 555: 552: 537: 536: 535: 534: 489: 486: 485: 484: 461: 460: 429: 428: 427: 426: 380: 377: 342: 339: 337: 333: 332: 329: 328: 325: 324: 313: 307: 306: 304: 287:the discussion 274: 273: 257: 245: 244: 236: 224: 223: 217: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4580: 4569: 4566: 4564: 4561: 4559: 4556: 4554: 4551: 4549: 4546: 4544: 4541: 4539: 4536: 4534: 4531: 4530: 4528: 4519: 4515: 4511: 4507: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4496: 4492: 4488: 4487:123.51.107.94 4480: 4474: 4466: 4463:parameter to 4454: 4450: 4443: 4442: 4436: 4434: 4433: 4429: 4425: 4421: 4413: 4411: 4410: 4406: 4402: 4398: 4391: 4388: 4370: 4366: 4360: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4344: 4340: 4336: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4324: 4320: 4318: 4313: 4302: 4300: 4299: 4294: 4289: 4288: 4277: 4273: 4270: 4266: 4265: 4264: 4257: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4239: 4233: 4228: 4223: 4219: 4215: 4214: 4213: 4211: 4207: 4203: 4198: 4192: 4186: 4182: 4178: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4168: 4164: 4161: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4141: 4133: 4129: 4125: 4121: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4111: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4095: 4083: 4065: 4058: 4052: 4049: 4045: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4023: 4019: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3986: 3982: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3970: 3966: 3962: 3958: 3954: 3946: 3944: 3943: 3939: 3935: 3929: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3905: 3903: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3893:Pleasantville 3890: 3882: 3876: 3872: 3868: 3863: 3862: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3840: 3822: 3818: 3812: 3809: 3805: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3786: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3772:calculators. 3765: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3720: 3717: 3711: 3705: 3704: 3700: 3696: 3692: 3688: 3687: 3680: 3676: 3673: 3669: 3666: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3658: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3637: 3634: 3630: 3629: 3623: 3621: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3605:BrandonNajera 3602: 3590: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3566: 3562: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3546:76.117.247.55 3540:I have to ask 3539: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3463: 3459: 3455: 3451: 3450: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3373: 3371: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3354: 3349: 3346: 3340: 3330: 3327: 3322: 3316: 3312: 3306: 3302: 3298: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3289: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3247: 3243: 3238: 3233: 3229: 3227: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3190:WP:COMMONNAME 3187: 3181: 3178: 3173: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3147: 3143: 3138: 3134: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3114: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3102: 3098: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3066: 3058: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3029: 3024: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 2998: 2994: 2989: 2985: 2984:wp:COMMONNAME 2974: 2971: 2966: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2925: 2920: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2864: 2861: 2860: 2856: 2850: 2845: 2841: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2810: 2807: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2767:WP:COMMONNAME 2764: 2763: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2734: 2730: 2727: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2699: 2696: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2671: 2670: 2665: 2661: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2631: 2630: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2608: 2607: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2596: 2592: 2589: 2587: 2584: 2583: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2538: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2520: 2519: 2514: 2510: 2507: 2505: 2501: 2496: 2491: 2490:WP:COMMONNAME 2487: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2452: 2450: 2446: 2438: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2411: 2407: 2402: 2398: 2393: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2355: 2353: 2348: 2344: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2328: 2322: 2319: 2314: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2286: 2282: 2274: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2251: 2247: 2242: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2232: 2227: 2222: 2220: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2208: 2204: 2199: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2190: 2185: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2164: 2163: 2160: 2158: 2154: 2146: 2142:*'''Oppose''' 2140: 2134: 2131: 2130: 2126: 2124: 2123: 2120: 2115: 2110: 2108: 2104: 2098: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2074: 2068: 2065: 2059: 2058: 2053: 2041: 2038: 2033: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2020: 2016: 2011: 2007: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1998: 1993: 1987: 1984: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1960:WP:COMMONNAME 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1925: 1920: 1911: 1908: 1903: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1888: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1866: 1862: 1852: 1849: 1844: 1838: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1817: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1788: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1747: 1743: 1738: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1728: 1723: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1693: 1689: 1684: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1666:wp:COMMONNAME 1663: 1659: 1646: 1643: 1639: 1637: 1632: 1628: 1623: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1597: 1593: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1523: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1483: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1468: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1458: 1453: 1446: 1444: 1441: 1437: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1429: 1425: 1420: 1419:primary topic 1416: 1412: 1411: 1408: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1393: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1375: 1374: 1369: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1356: 1348: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1331:WP:COMMONNAME 1328: 1324: 1321: 1319: 1316: 1313: 1309: 1306: 1304: 1301: 1299: 1293: 1289: 1286: 1282: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1266: 1261: 1259: 1252: 1249: 1245: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1227: 1226:London, Texas 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1165: 1162: 1158: 1153: 1149: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1125: 1121: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1088: 1085: 1081: 1076: 1072: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1018: 1017: 1012: 1009: 1004: 999: 997: 992: 991: 990: 987: 982: 976: 973: 971: 967: 963: 959: 956: 954: 950: 946: 942: 939: 938: 935: 932: 928: 924: 921: 920: 917: 915: 911: 903: 899:*'''Oppose''' 897: 891: 888: 887: 883: 881: 880: 877: 872: 866: 862: 858: 854: 847: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 813: 812: 811: 808: 803: 787: 783: 779: 774: 773: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 755: 754: 753: 750: 749: 744: 743: 737: 732: 728: 720: 716: 713: 709: 703: 700: 699:67.11.141.177 696: 691: 690: 687: 683: 679: 678:75.17.188.189 675: 669: 668: 667: 664: 659: 658: 657: 653: 649: 645: 644:4.164.243.231 641: 630: 620: 615: 611: 604: 601: 597: 593: 588: 584: 580: 575: 574: 573: 572: 569: 564: 560: 553: 551: 550: 546: 542: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 509: 508: 507: 504: 500: 499: 498: 496: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 463: 462: 459: 455: 451: 446: 445: 444: 443: 439: 435: 425: 421: 417: 412: 411: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 392: 391: 389: 385: 378: 376: 375: 371: 367: 362: 360: 356: 350: 346: 340: 338: 322: 318: 312: 309: 308: 305: 288: 284: 280: 279: 271: 265: 260: 258: 255: 251: 250: 246: 240: 237: 234: 230: 225: 221: 215: 207: 206: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 4505: 4484: 4478: 4472: 4464: 4453:edit request 4419: 4417: 4396: 4394: 4389: 4373:. Retrieved 4368: 4359: 4351: 4347: 4316: 4311: 4306: 4284: 4281: 4256:source check 4235: 4229: 4226: 4199: 4196: 4138: 4137: 4134:digit serial 4092:— Preceding 4087: 4068:. Retrieved 4063: 4051: 4043: 4026:31.51.127.60 3956: 3952: 3950: 3930: 3912:— Preceding 3909: 3886: 3848:Technogeezer 3844: 3825:. Retrieved 3820: 3811: 3803: 3770: 3723:121.74.52.57 3721: 3718: 3715: 3690: 3689: 3683: 3656: 3655: 3647: 3599:— Preceding 3594: 3543: 3377: 3358: 3344: 3341: 3257: 3223: 3212:WP:PRECISION 3135:discussion. 3132: 3112: 3017:WP:PRECISION 2981: 2932: 2912: 2885: 2881: 2869: 2867: 2862: 2808: 2728: 2667: 2652: 2628: 2615: 2604: 2591:Still oppose 2590: 2580: 2560: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2516: 2508: 2477: 2465: 2462:WP:PRECISION 2453: 2425:Apple iPhone 2412: 2368: 2356: 2329: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2218: 2216: 2178:WP:PRECISION 2173: 2165: 2150: 2144: 2138: 2132: 2106: 2102: 2100: 2099: 2089: 2073:No consensus 2072: 2071: 2063: 2060: 2005: 1985: 1982: 1914: 1898:calculator. 1895: 1891: 1859: 1706:redirect to 1678:WP:PRECISION 1670:wp:PRECISION 1655: 1583:wp:RECENTISM 1553: 1536:WP:RECENTISM 1479: 1423: 1418: 1414: 1406: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1371: 1363: 1322: 1307: 1287: 1257: 1250: 1218:wp:PRECISION 1182: 1163: 1106: 1086: 1048:Andy Dingley 1019: 998:'s proposal. 993: 974: 957: 940: 922: 907: 901: 895: 889: 851: 797: 738: 734: 724: 634: 609: 603: 595: 591: 565: 561: 557: 538: 491: 430: 403: 399: 395: 388:66.245.2.190 383: 382: 363: 354: 352: 348: 344: 336: 317:Mid-priority 316: 276: 242:Mid‑priority 220:WikiProjects 203: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 4485:Thank you. 3999:Moore's law 3995:Carver Mead 3743:Wtshymanski 3657:Don't panic 3561:Wtshymanski 3497:Yottamaster 3454:Wtshymanski 3397:Wtshymanski 3361:Yottamaster 2790:Wtshymanski 2753:Wtshymanski 2733:common name 2716:Wtshymanski 2681:Wtshymanski 2639:Wtshymanski 2513:common name 2334:common name 2078:Vegaswikian 1983:undisclosed 1415:common name 1368:common name 1297:Ohconfucius 1164:Another way 1139:common name 1062:common name 962:Wtshymanski 763:Yottamaster 712:Notinasnaid 638:—Preceding 513:—Preceding 359:Frecklefoot 292:Mathematics 283:mathematics 239:Mathematics 148:free images 31:not a forum 4527:Categories 4457:|answered= 4352:References 4293:Report bug 4202:Calculator 4044:References 3867:Polytope4d 3804:References 3266:Psychology 3258:calculator 3237:ErikHaugen 3232:calculator 3226:calculator 3220:Psychology 3137:ErikHaugen 3113:calculator 3092:ErikHaugen 2988:ErikHaugen 2886:calculator 2870:calculator 2857:Discussion 2835:ErikHaugen 2827:calculator 2577:Calculator 2530:rbitrarily 2482:Calculator 2470:Calculator 2392:ErikHaugen 2373:Calculator 2338:ErikHaugen 2261:Calculator 2241:ErikHaugen 2219:definitely 2198:ErikHaugen 2174:Calculator 2107:Calculator 2091:Calculator 2010:ErikHaugen 1952:Calculator 1896:electronic 1892:ELECTRONIC 1832:Calculator 1809:Psychology 1737:ErikHaugen 1704:Calculator 1683:ErikHaugen 1668:) against 1658:Calculator 1622:ErikHaugen 1587:ErikHaugen 1495:Psychology 1401:Discussion 1385:rbitrarily 1276:article? 1230:ErikHaugen 1143:ErikHaugen 1135:Calculator 1115:ErikHaugen 1066:ErikHaugen 1040:calculator 1024:calculator 927:calculator 865:Calculator 853:Calculator 761:is useful. 596:References 400:Calculator 25:Calculator 4506:Not done: 4414:Causality 4375:26 August 4303:Education 4276:this tool 4269:this tool 4160:Fiden 130 4066:. Cal-Tex 4020:. Or see 3827:26 August 3733:14/12/12 3482:WhaleyTim 3440:WhaleyTim 3412:WhaleyTim 3381:WhaleyTim 3009:ambiguous 2105:and have 2006:attempted 1480:Precision 1090:implied. 519:Eisenbeis 208:is rated 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 4312:Polytope 4282:Cheers.— 4106:contribs 4094:unsigned 4070:29 March 4057:"CT7001" 3993:I asked 3947:Cal-Tech 3914:unsigned 3665:non-free 3613:contribs 3601:unsigned 3468:Dicklyon 3426:Dicklyon 3297:Dicklyon 3274:Dicklyon 3246:contribs 3198:Dicklyon 3146:contribs 3118:Dicklyon 3101:contribs 3076:Dicklyon 3037:computer 2997:contribs 2931:Hmmm... 2844:contribs 2775:Dicklyon 2573:computer 2567:or even 2546:Dicklyon 2401:contribs 2377:Dicklyon 2347:contribs 2250:contribs 2207:contribs 2151:. Since 2019:contribs 1968:Dicklyon 1956:WP:TITLE 1934:Dicklyon 1876:Dicklyon 1792:Dicklyon 1757:Dicklyon 1746:contribs 1692:contribs 1631:contribs 1608:Dicklyon 1596:contribs 1567:Dicklyon 1554:de facto 1540:Dicklyon 1476:WP:TITLE 1312:GFHandel 1239:contribs 1187:Dicklyon 1152:contribs 1124:contribs 1111:not here 1075:contribs 996:Dicklyon 945:Dicklyon 908:. Since 829:Dicklyon 674:unsigned 652:contribs 640:unsigned 568:Eienmaru 527:contribs 515:unsigned 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 4206:my edit 4140:cycles. 3961:Caltech 3957:Cal-Tex 3049:CWenger 2949:Andrewa 2890:Andrewa 2738:Jenks24 2561:Support 2466:This is 2429:CWenger 2357:Support 2299:generic 2265:CWenger 2166:Support 1986:unclear 1672:. (See 1501:), and 1339:CWenger 1308:Support 1288:Support 1251:Support 1183:support 1092:Jenks24 1020:Support 975:Support 958:Support 941:Support 731:base 10 663:Wernher 503:MaltaGC 488:History 319:on the 210:B-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 4510:Meters 4163:BBCLCD 3761:Powers 3739:Barbie 3288:Powers 3262:London 3216:London 2937:Camera 2905:Abacus 2874:abacus 2809:Oppose 2729:Oppose 2695:Powers 2657:Powers 2620:Powers 2595:Powers 2509:Oppose 2476:it is 2454:Oppose 2421:iPhone 2413:Oppose 2330:Oppose 2127:Survey 1865:Powers 1813:Powers 1778:Powers 1774:Boston 1642:Powers 1558:Powers 1519:Powers 1503:Laptop 1487:London 1467:Powers 1440:Powers 1428:Powers 1424:no way 1364:Oppose 1323:Oppose 1278:Powers 1274:London 1264:(talk) 1222:London 1107:Oppose 1087:Oppose 931:Powers 884:Survey 495:Ken6en 394:Go to 216:scale. 126:Google 4461:|ans= 4451:This 4060:(PDF) 3575:Cliff 3325:lozzo 3176:lozzo 3027:lozzo 2969:lozzo 2923:lozzo 2813:Cliff 2771:WP:AT 2653:scope 2500:deeds 2478:still 2317:lozzo 2230:lozzo 2188:lozzo 2118:lozzo 2036:lozzo 1996:lozzo 1923:lozzo 1906:lozzo 1847:lozzo 1726:lozzo 1517:).) 1513:(not 1505:(not 1497:(not 1489:(not 1456:lozzo 1007:lozzo 985:lozzo 875:lozzo 825:WP:RM 806:lozzo 736:Brisv 408:Wizzy 355:about 197:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 4514:talk 4491:talk 4428:talk 4424:Gah4 4405:talk 4401:Gah4 4377:2016 4339:talk 4335:Gah4 4323:talk 4181:talk 4177:Gah4 4167:talk 4149:talk 4145:Gah4 4124:talk 4120:Gah4 4102:talk 4072:2017 4030:talk 4022:here 4018:here 4007:talk 4003:Gah4 3985:talk 3981:Gah4 3969:talk 3965:Gah4 3938:talk 3934:Gah4 3922:talk 3897:talk 3871:talk 3852:talk 3829:2016 3794:talk 3790:Gah4 3778:talk 3774:Gah4 3759:". 3747:talk 3727:talk 3699:talk 3609:talk 3579:talk 3565:talk 3550:talk 3516:talk 3512:Gah4 3501:talk 3486:talk 3472:talk 3458:talk 3444:talk 3430:talk 3416:talk 3401:talk 3385:talk 3365:talk 3320:Joja 3301:talk 3278:talk 3242:talk 3202:talk 3171:Joja 3160:and 3142:talk 3133:this 3122:talk 3097:talk 3080:talk 3022:Joja 3015:and 2993:talk 2964:Joja 2953:talk 2918:Joja 2894:talk 2840:talk 2817:talk 2794:talk 2779:talk 2757:talk 2742:talk 2720:talk 2685:talk 2669:Ruud 2643:talk 2606:Ruud 2582:Ruud 2550:talk 2397:talk 2381:talk 2343:talk 2312:Joja 2246:talk 2225:Joja 2203:talk 2183:Joja 2148:~~~~ 2113:Joja 2082:talk 2031:Joja 2015:talk 1991:Joja 1972:talk 1938:talk 1918:Joja 1901:Joja 1880:talk 1842:Joja 1796:talk 1761:talk 1742:talk 1721:Joja 1688:talk 1627:talk 1612:talk 1592:talk 1571:talk 1544:talk 1534:See 1478:'s " 1451:Joja 1258:Tony 1235:talk 1206:talk 1191:talk 1173:talk 1148:talk 1120:talk 1096:talk 1071:talk 1052:talk 1030:and 1002:Joja 980:Joja 966:talk 949:talk 905:~~~~ 870:Joja 833:talk 801:Joja 782:talk 778:Gah4 767:talk 682:talk 648:talk 614:ISBN 583:talk 579:Gah4 545:talk 523:talk 478:talk 474:Gah4 454:talk 450:Gah4 438:talk 434:Gah4 420:talk 416:Gah4 370:talk 366:Gah4 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 4479:to 4459:or 4250:RfC 4220:to 4001:. 3963:. 3039:to 2876:at 2571:to 2460:or 2427:. – 2305:" ( 1811:. 1776:. 1660:to 1493:), 1042:to 929:. 827:. 747:gas 468:to 311:Mid 176:TWL 4529:: 4516:) 4493:) 4465:no 4430:) 4407:) 4367:. 4341:) 4325:) 4317:4D 4263:. 4258:}} 4254:{{ 4183:) 4169:) 4151:) 4126:) 4108:) 4104:• 4062:. 4032:) 4009:) 3987:) 3971:) 3940:) 3924:) 3899:) 3873:) 3854:) 3819:. 3796:) 3780:) 3749:) 3729:) 3701:) 3693:-- 3615:) 3611:• 3581:) 3567:) 3552:) 3518:) 3503:) 3488:) 3474:) 3460:) 3446:) 3432:) 3418:) 3403:) 3387:) 3367:) 3303:) 3280:) 3264:, 3244:| 3218:, 3204:) 3168:. 3144:| 3124:) 3099:| 3082:) 3067:) 3059:• 2995:| 2955:) 2896:) 2888:. 2842:| 2819:) 2796:) 2788:-- 2781:) 2759:) 2751:-- 2744:) 2722:) 2687:) 2645:) 2552:) 2447:) 2439:• 2399:| 2383:) 2345:| 2309:) 2295:is 2283:) 2275:• 2248:| 2205:| 2139:or 2093:→ 2084:) 2017:| 1974:) 1940:) 1882:) 1798:) 1763:) 1744:| 1690:| 1629:| 1614:) 1594:| 1573:) 1546:) 1357:) 1349:• 1237:| 1228:. 1208:) 1193:) 1175:) 1150:| 1141:. 1122:| 1113:. 1098:) 1073:| 1054:) 1026:, 968:) 951:) 896:or 855:→ 835:) 784:) 769:) 684:) 650:• 585:) 547:) 529:) 525:• 480:) 456:) 440:) 422:) 372:) 156:) 54:; 4512:( 4489:( 4426:( 4403:( 4379:. 4337:( 4321:( 4295:) 4291:( 4278:. 4271:. 4179:( 4165:( 4147:( 4122:( 4100:( 4074:. 4028:( 4005:( 3983:( 3967:( 3936:( 3920:( 3895:( 3869:( 3865:- 3850:( 3831:. 3792:( 3776:( 3755:" 3745:( 3725:( 3697:( 3607:( 3577:( 3563:( 3548:( 3514:( 3499:( 3484:( 3470:( 3456:( 3442:( 3428:( 3414:( 3399:( 3383:( 3363:( 3299:( 3276:( 3248:) 3240:( 3228:? 3200:( 3148:) 3140:( 3120:( 3103:) 3095:( 3078:( 3063:@ 3055:^ 3051:( 2999:) 2991:( 2951:( 2892:( 2846:) 2838:( 2815:( 2792:( 2777:( 2755:( 2740:( 2718:( 2683:( 2641:( 2603:— 2548:( 2532:0 2528:A 2443:@ 2435:^ 2431:( 2403:) 2395:( 2379:( 2349:) 2341:( 2279:@ 2271:^ 2267:( 2252:) 2244:( 2209:) 2201:( 2159:. 2080:( 2021:) 2013:( 1970:( 1936:( 1878:( 1794:( 1759:( 1748:) 1740:( 1694:) 1686:( 1633:) 1625:( 1610:( 1598:) 1590:( 1569:( 1542:( 1387:0 1383:A 1353:@ 1345:^ 1341:( 1315:♬ 1241:) 1233:( 1204:( 1189:( 1171:( 1154:) 1146:( 1126:) 1118:( 1094:( 1077:) 1069:( 1050:( 964:( 947:( 916:. 831:( 780:( 765:( 741:e 693:( 688:. 680:( 646:( 621:. 581:( 543:( 521:( 476:( 452:( 436:( 418:( 368:( 323:. 222:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index