185:
91:
474:
64:
101:
462:
252:
33:
242:
221:
173:
630:
replace low resolution images on
Knowledge (XXG). It is not a matter of artistic opinion. Bigger is better if no other problem exists within the new image. This is a matter of picking and choosing battles. I honestly feel that I can simply create another article with a different title and hope for expansion over time.
629:
I took out my image from the consensus for one reason. I don't want to participate on this particular article (with no prejudice). The image is on commons and I have no real control of it's use on wiki or elsewhere, however as a participating member of the now defunct
Project illustration, I actively
522:
I specificaly changed the image to a larger, more detailed with an angle that I thought was more illustrative. Frankly this goes against guildlines to return the image. I was not wrong for the bold change. The image is better only in that it is larger and perhaps brighter. The burden of proff falls
532:
Hey don't worry. I'll take my image off. I like the idea that a consensus is being formed but the person who replaced the larger images with the smaller low resolution image he uploaded is being extremly selfish and I simply don't wish to deal with it. I really don't care enough to make this a
496:(1) is a good image, but too small. I like (2) -- note that I added it to the article, but it's not my photo so I don't really have a dog in this fight -- because it shows the reflecting pool in front. (3) is also a nice photo, but the angle in (2) along with the pool makes me prefer that.
652:
The Legion of Honor no longer refers to itself by its full name, so I'm going to rename the article to reflect and updating the lede. Not expecting it to be controversial so I'm not initiating a move discussion, but let me know if you have any questions please.
443:
The one I've put in was the original image (march 2004 to nov 2006); it was cacked up by a 3-edit contributor, and removed by a bot (in Nov 2007) The next image (added Dec 2008)was the one just changed. Which image is best for the lead of this article? And why?
198:
74:
580:
I have my own opinion of which I prefer, but my purpose here was to find a consensus; So, do we need a new image? If so, what? It’s up to you whether you take part in this, or pick up your marbles and go…
713:
203:
568:
Second: thank you for your explanation of why you changed; it wasn’t in the edit history, and it isn’t obviously better, so there was nothing to say it wasn’t just done on a whim.
708:
718:
576:; we are at the "Discuss” stage. And as change is by agreement, it is just as much incumbent on you to show why a change is better as it is for another to say why not.
675:
The exterior of this building also appeared in an episode of the original Star Trek titled "Bread and
Circuses". Should this be added in the "appearences" list?
163:
703:
153:
523:
on those that return or revert. As it stands the image was replaced by a far less quality image by the original uploader and that just seems self serving.
308:
542:
I have a large amount of images from The Legion of honor and was intending to expand this article.....but I think it can stay this way. I don't care.--
733:
723:
698:
367:. I may return at another time to add the information, but thought I'd note it here in case anybody is watching this space and wants to fill it in.
331:
298:
573:
129:
485:
728:
564:
First: a correction: I didn’t post the original image, I merely replaced it. The sentence above was misleading (lysdexia?) so I’ve fixed it.
274:
114:
69:
418:
I have a few pictures, including the unmentioned
Chihuly Tree in the Courtyard. If I upload them, can someone post them on the page?
265:
226:
350:
44:
190:
50:
32:
395:
from the collection highlights. I was there today and it's definitively not show there. From my web research
17:
638:
547:
338:
658:
437:
The lead image here was changed without explanation; I've removed it until the matter has been discussed.
273:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
128:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
680:
423:
346:
405:
634:
619:
604:
585:
543:
507:
473:
449:
599:(1) is quite unimpressive compared to (2), which in my opinion is the better image of the two.
654:
106:
461:
398:
368:
363:
The Legion of Honor was the location of several important scenes in Alfred
Hitchcock's film
676:
419:
401:
388:
364:
342:
257:
692:
615:
600:
581:
499:
445:
684:
662:
642:
623:
608:
589:
551:
513:
453:
427:
408:
371:
383:
90:
63:
251:
247:
180:
124:
119:
96:
396:
487:
File:(Edit; removed my image from consensus. Decide between these images)
241:
220:
172:
270:
440:
The original image (march 2004 to nov 2006) was the one I've put in
392:
26:
171:
118:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
269:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
614:That seems to be it: We'll go with image 2, then
714:High-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
572:Thirdly the "guideline”, if you want one, is
18:Talk:California Palace of the Legion of Honor
8:
709:Start-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
30:
719:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
215:
58:
484:
332:California Palace of the Legion of Honor
457:
217:
60:
138:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject California
7:
263:This article is within the scope of
112:This article is within the scope of
400:it seems that this painting is the
283:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Museums
49:It is of interest to the following
704:Low-importance California articles
25:
199:San Francisco Bay Area task force
472:
460:
250:
240:
219:
183:
99:
89:
62:
31:
734:Low-importance Museums articles
724:WikiProject California articles
699:Start-Class California articles
303:This article has been rated as
158:This article has been rated as
141:Template:WikiProject California
409:03:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
277:and see a list of open tasks.
196:This article is supported by
191:San Francisco Bay Area portal
132:and see a list of open tasks.
729:Start-Class Museums articles
663:00:23, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
428:16:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
286:Template:WikiProject Museums
685:23:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
750:
330:I'm going to move this to
309:project's importance scale
164:project's importance scale
643:01:26, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
624:12:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
609:17:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
590:12:28, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
552:00:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
514:16:48, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
454:19:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
302:
235:
179:
157:
84:
57:
372:06:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
633:But I like 2 as well.--
353:) 05:59, 20 August 2004
176:
115:WikiProject California
75:San Francisco Bay Area
39:This article is rated
175:
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
404:in Madrid, Spain. --
266:WikiProject Museums
144:California articles
177:
45:content assessment
511:
355:
341:comment added by
323:
322:
319:
318:
315:
314:
214:
213:
210:
209:
107:California portal
16:(Redirected from
741:
671:Film Appearences
512:
505:
502:
490:
488:
476:
464:
354:
335:
291:
290:
289:Museums articles
287:
284:
281:
260:
255:
254:
244:
237:
236:
231:
223:
216:
193:
188:
187:
186:
146:
145:
142:
139:
136:
109:
104:
103:
102:
93:
86:
85:
80:
77:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
749:
748:
744:
743:
742:
740:
739:
738:
689:
688:
673:
650:
500:
497:
491:
486:
480:
477:
468:
465:
435:
416:
402:Museo del Prado
379:
361:
336:
328:
288:
285:
282:
279:
278:
256:
249:
229:
204:High-importance
189:
184:
182:
143:
140:
137:
134:
133:
105:
100:
98:
78:
72:
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
747:
745:
737:
736:
731:
726:
721:
716:
711:
706:
701:
691:
690:
672:
669:
667:
649:
646:
627:
626:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
578:
577:
570:
569:
566:
565:
557:
556:
555:
554:
537:
536:
535:
534:
527:
526:
525:
524:
517:
516:
493:
492:
483:
481:
478:
471:
469:
466:
459:
442:
438:
434:
431:
415:
412:
389:Albrecht Durer
378:
375:
360:
357:
327:
326:First comments
324:
321:
320:
317:
316:
313:
312:
305:Low-importance
301:
295:
294:
292:
275:the discussion
262:
261:
258:museums portal
245:
233:
232:
230:Low‑importance
224:
212:
211:
208:
207:
195:
194:
178:
168:
167:
160:Low-importance
156:
150:
149:
147:
130:the discussion
111:
110:
94:
82:
81:
79:Low‑importance
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
746:
735:
732:
730:
727:
725:
722:
720:
717:
715:
712:
710:
707:
705:
702:
700:
697:
696:
694:
687:
686:
682:
678:
670:
668:
665:
664:
660:
656:
647:
645:
644:
640:
636:
635:Amadscientist
631:
625:
621:
617:
613:
612:
611:
610:
606:
602:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
553:
549:
545:
544:Amadscientist
541:
540:
539:
538:
531:
530:
529:
528:
521:
520:
519:
518:
515:
509:
504:
503:
495:
494:
489:
482:
475:
470:
463:
458:
456:
455:
451:
447:
441:
432:
430:
429:
425:
421:
413:
411:
410:
407:
403:
399:
397:
394:
390:
387:
385:
376:
374:
373:
370:
366:
358:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
333:
325:
310:
306:
300:
297:
296:
293:
276:
272:
268:
267:
259:
253:
248:
246:
243:
239:
238:
234:
228:
225:
222:
218:
205:
202:(assessed as
201:
200:
192:
181:
174:
170:
169:
165:
161:
155:
152:
151:
148:
131:
127:
126:
121:
117:
116:
108:
97:
95:
92:
88:
87:
83:
76:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
674:
666:
655:Kevin Gorman
651:
632:
628:
598:
498:
439:
436:
417:
384:Adam and Eve
382:
380:
362:
329:
304:
264:
197:
159:
123:
113:
51:WikiProjects
369:Cuffeparade
337:—Preceding
41:Start-class
693:Categories
677:Promus Kaa
433:Lead image
420:Centrisian
135:California
125:California
120:U.S. state
70:California
343:Chinasaur
616:Swanny18
601:Jack1956
582:Swanny18
501:howcheng
446:Swanny18
414:Pictures
381:Removed
351:contribs
339:unsigned
406:Xca1019
377:Comment
365:Vertigo
359:Vertigo
307:on the
280:Museums
271:museums
227:Museums
162:on the
648:naming
574:WP:BRD
533:point.
47:scale.
681:talk
659:talk
639:talk
620:talk
605:talk
586:talk
548:talk
508:chat
450:talk
424:talk
393:1504
347:talk
299:Low
154:Low
122:of
695::
683:)
661:)
641:)
622:)
607:)
588:)
550:)
452:)
426:)
391:,
349:•
334:.
206:).
73::
679:(
657:(
637:(
618:(
603:(
584:(
546:(
510:}
506:{
479:2
467:1
448:(
422:(
386:.
345:(
311:.
166:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
