67:
49:
22:
230:
Interesting idea. What exactly were you thinking the drawings would be of? Unfortunately, if there are any drawings out there of such nature, I doubt you could get proper license. It would have to be hand made by one of us. I have thought about making drawings of the EF/EF-S lens mount, as I have
194:
It is not duplicate information. The first paragraph talks about how EF-S lenses will not work on full frame EF mount cameras. The second paragraph talks about how you might be able to get EF-S lenses to work on old APS-C cameras, like the D30 to 10D, and EOS X(lite). I reversed you edit.
146:
AFAIK, Canon doesn't have any EF (non EF-S) lenses designed for a smaller image circle than 35mm. The kit lenses for the IX and the IX Lite were 22-55 and 24-85 full frame 35mm lenses. Other manufacturers like Sigma and Tamron have APS-C type lenses in regular EF mount, though.
138:
Any examples? I thought all EF-mount lens were designed for 35mm. (All EF-S lenses are designed for APS-C, of course.) There were a few EF lenses designed for APS film way back when, I believe, but not digital APS-C in particular.
231:
Auto CAD, but don't have the tools to make proper measurements. Any drawings I could make, would be "rough", and not accurate enough for encyclopedic standards, IMAO. But maybe something is better than nothing. Thoughts?
157:
I would love to see a list of pros and cons compared to EF lenses, to help in buying decisions. Also, I have read elsewhere about some sort of "1.6x crop factor" with EF-S lenses -- what is that all about?
215:
Does anyone have technical drawings to accompany this article? I've looked around a bit but haven't found a good drawing anywhere. If anyone knows of a drawing, please add it to this article.
344:
107:
172:
Removed the duplicate information concerning the mounting of the EF-S lens on to bodies that were not designed for it as its well covered in the previous paragraph.
278:, and since the stats could be summarised into an expanded table on this page, I'm of the opinion we could include any interesting stuff on this page. Thoughts?
113:
349:
339:
83:
179:
316:
298:
313:
74:
54:
252:
29:
283:
183:
312:
AP-H cameras will not accept EF-S lenses without modification, as stated in the specifications of the 1D mkIV
320:
275:
260:
302:
279:
159:
35:
135:"However, not all such lenses require the shorter back focus, and may feature the standard EF mount."
175:
82:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
314:
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/slr_cameras/eos_1d_mark_iv#Specifications
256:
236:
200:
274:
Do we really need one article for each EF-S lens? Since they're all currently stubs except
220:
66:
48:
297:
It is written that it fits on APS-C and not on 35 mm full frame, but what about APS-H? --
333:
148:
324:
306:
287:
264:
240:
232:
224:
204:
196:
187:
162:
151:
79:
216:
15:
78:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
28:This article has not yet been rated on Knowledge's
112:This article has not yet received a rating on the
8:
43:
21:
19:
345:Unknown-importance Photography articles
45:
7:
72:This article is within the scope of
34:It is of interest to the following
168:Removal of duplicated information.
14:
92:Knowledge:WikiProject Photography
350:WikiProject Photography articles
255:? It sounds like some might be.
95:Template:WikiProject Photography
65:
47:
20:
340:Unassessed Photography articles
270:Individual Canon lens articles?
251:Are these lenses approximately
142:--22:26, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
1:
152:01:34, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
86:and see a list of open tasks.
293:Does EF-S fit to APS-H, too?
163:17:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
307:18:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
366:
241:08:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
225:05:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
205:01:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
188:14:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
114:project's importance scale
111:
60:
42:
325:14:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
288:06:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
265:14:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
253:image-space telecentric
75:WikiProject Photography
98:Photography articles
211:Technical Drawings?
30:content assessment
190:
178:comment added by
128:
127:
124:
123:
120:
119:
357:
173:
100:
99:
96:
93:
90:
69:
62:
61:
51:
44:
25:
24:
23:
16:
365:
364:
360:
359:
358:
356:
355:
354:
330:
329:
295:
272:
257:—Ben FrantzDale
249:
247:Telecentricity?
213:
170:
133:
97:
94:
91:
88:
87:
12:
11:
5:
363:
361:
353:
352:
347:
342:
332:
331:
328:
327:
294:
291:
271:
268:
248:
245:
244:
243:
212:
209:
208:
207:
180:143.166.255.56
169:
166:
155:
154:
132:
129:
126:
125:
122:
121:
118:
117:
110:
104:
103:
101:
84:the discussion
70:
58:
57:
52:
40:
39:
33:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
362:
351:
348:
346:
343:
341:
338:
337:
335:
326:
322:
318:
317:137.99.236.88
315:
311:
310:
309:
308:
304:
300:
292:
290:
289:
285:
281:
277:
269:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
246:
242:
238:
234:
229:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
210:
206:
202:
198:
193:
192:
191:
189:
185:
181:
177:
167:
165:
164:
161:
160:76.102.95.104
153:
150:
145:
144:
143:
140:
136:
130:
115:
109:
106:
105:
102:
85:
81:
77:
76:
71:
68:
64:
63:
59:
56:
53:
50:
46:
41:
37:
31:
27:
18:
17:
299:92.74.20.221
296:
273:
250:
214:
171:
156:
141:
137:
134:
73:
36:WikiProjects
174:—Preceding
89:Photography
80:photography
55:Photography
334:Categories
176:unsigned
131:Untitled
276:17-55mm
149:mvdhout
233:Nebrot
197:Nebrot
32:scale.
217:neffk
321:talk
303:talk
284:talk
261:talk
237:talk
221:talk
201:talk
184:talk
280:Jon
108:???
336::
323:)
305:)
286:)
263:)
239:)
223:)
203:)
186:)
319:(
301:(
282:(
259:(
235:(
219:(
199:(
182:(
116:.
38::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
