280:
to a single acknowledgment in a single book by another academic who doesn't seem to be notable by
Knowledge standards. The acknowledgment is relegated to the middle of the sixth of seven paragraphs of the acknowledgment, and resounds "The work of critical accountants such as David Cooper, Tony Tinker, Marilyn Neimark, Cheryl Lehman and Hugh Willmott has certainly made my task less onerous." So, the citation does not seem to support the claim of the statement; please find a correct citation for the claim, or expect the claim to be deleted from the article.
141:
123:
92:
21:
151:
279:
So then I tried something else. The article claims "Lehman is considered to be a major contributor to behavioral and sociological perspectives in accounting research", so I checked out the footnote. Bad citation. You should consider finding another one, or deleting the statement. The footnote points
263:
to see if there wasn't a standard by which it should be included. Based upon the text of the article as currently written, the only criteria that seemed that might plausibly maybe fit was #1, "the person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as
272:"the academic discipline of the person in question needs to be sufficiently broadly construed ... Overly narrow and highly specialized categories should be avoided. Arguing that someone is an expert in an extremely narrow area of study is, in and of itself, not necessarily sufficient"
283:
For completeness' sake, since Lehman was listed as fourth of five in that list buried in the acknowledgment, I decided to check if the others were the subject of
Knowledge articles. None were. That doesn't mean they might not be notable, but that's where I stopped.
255:
I received your note on my talk page asking me to review this page for compliance with
Knowledge's notability standards. Let's continue the discussion here, on the project talk page, to keep things in one place.
71:
31:
314:
76:
59:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
324:
319:
169:
51:
173:
177:
168:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
164:
128:
222:
I see that you have been working to create this page. It seems to me, so far, that the page does not yet meet
Knowledge's
103:
27:
91:
60:
296:
268:
to review how to evaluate that criteria, and discovered a few more hurdles for the article to overcome:
239:
109:
70:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
20:
265:
260:
227:
74:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
275:"Simply having authored a large number of published academic works is not considered sufficient"
290:
250:
233:
217:
156:
67:
223:
308:
259:
I've reviewed the article and did not find the subject notable. I then referred to
140:
122:
146:
300:
243:
176:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
264:
demonstrated by independent reliable sources", so I proceeded to
85:
66:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
43:
15:
230:
before continuing to invest your time developing this page. —
226:. If you haven't already done so, you may want to refer to
8:
89:
117:
119:
7:
162:This article is within the scope of
315:Biography articles of living people
266:WP:ACADEMIC#Specific criteria notes
224:notability guidelines for academics
108:It is of interest to the following
14:
30:on 1 January 2016. The result of
149:
139:
121:
90:
49:This article must adhere to the
19:
186:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
26:This article was nominated for
325:WikiProject Biography articles
320:Start-Class biography articles
189:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
301:06:43, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
52:biographies of living persons
174:contribute to the discussion
244:20:22, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
64:must be removed immediately
341:
134:
116:
98:This article is rated
165:WikiProject Biography
192:biography articles
104:content assessment
208:
207:
204:
203:
200:
199:
84:
83:
42:
41:
332:
254:
221:
194:
193:
190:
187:
184:
170:join the project
159:
157:Biography portal
154:
153:
152:
143:
136:
135:
125:
118:
101:
95:
94:
86:
72:this noticeboard
44:
23:
16:
340:
339:
335:
334:
333:
331:
330:
329:
305:
304:
248:
215:
213:
191:
188:
185:
182:
181:
155:
150:
148:
102:on Knowledge's
99:
12:
11:
5:
338:
336:
328:
327:
322:
317:
307:
306:
277:
276:
273:
212:
209:
206:
205:
202:
201:
198:
197:
195:
161:
160:
144:
132:
131:
126:
114:
113:
107:
96:
82:
81:
77:this help page
61:poorly sourced
47:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
337:
326:
323:
321:
318:
316:
313:
312:
310:
303:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
285:
281:
274:
271:
270:
269:
267:
262:
257:
252:
246:
245:
241:
237:
236:
235:
229:
225:
219:
210:
196:
179:
178:documentation
175:
171:
167:
166:
158:
147:
145:
142:
138:
137:
133:
130:
127:
124:
120:
115:
111:
105:
97:
93:
88:
87:
79:
78:
73:
69:
65:
62:
58:
54:
53:
48:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
289:
288:
286:
282:
278:
258:
247:
232:
231:
214:
163:
110:WikiProjects
75:
63:
56:
50:
35:
291:Boruch Baum
261:WP:ACADEMIC
251:Dreadarthur
234:Boruch Baum
228:WP:ACADEMIC
218:Dreadarthur
100:Start-class
309:Categories
211:Notability
183:Biography
129:Biography
68:libellous
28:deletion
106:scale.
297:talk
240:talk
172:and
36:keep
34:was
57:BLP
311::
299:)
242:)
295:(
287:—
253::
249:@
238:(
220::
216:@
180:.
112::
80:.
55:(
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
