1019:
and
Ordonez highlight this concealment, although historian’s have known of Watson’s unconventional genealogy since the publication by Bede Nairn of a note on this subject in 1967. (10) Watson’s father appears to have died while Watson was only a few months old; by 1869 his mother Martha had returned with the young John, or Johan, to New Zealand and remarried, to George Thomas Watson, by trade a miner and by ancestry Irish, although his family had settled for a time in Scotland before George emigrated to Australia. John Christian seems to have been readily assimilated into the family created by Martha and George (they had nine other children) in Oamaru, in the Otago province in New Zealand’s south island. (11) Grassby and Ordonez suggest that Watson ‘…held close his secret of Johan Christian Tanck’, particularly during the First World War, when his loyalties may have been questioned. (12) They extrapolate from this concealment to an overstatement of the significance of Watson’s Chilean background and Australia’s links with Chile. Nonetheless there are some aspects of Watson’s birthright that are worth considering, even if they involve a degree of speculation. Firstly, Watson’s parentage posed an obstacle to his political career. As Jupp observed in a recent article, Watson might well have been successfully challenged as a member of the House of Representatives under s.44 of the Australian Constitution, on the grounds of his ‘dubious’ nationality – non-British subjects were ineligible to stand as candidates for the Australian Parliament. (13) This begs two questions: did Watson know the truth of his parentage, and did he actively seek to obscure public knowledge of it? I suspect that Watson knew of his real father, and his real name; but what’s interesting about this story is the investment that Watson and his contemporaries make in Watson’s legendary identity, an investment made in Watson’s face value.
772:
word "undercount", because he has argued that it's acceptable to claim whatever ancestry you want to claim - so I think your wording above covers that off nicely (by using the term "descent" which one should be able to apply to the children of
Chilean-Australians whereas the term "ancestry" is way too broad, open to interpretation and let's be honest, can be a little emotionally charged). I think it's important that we explain why the ABS figure looks so low (the ABS figure presents a misleading picture without the background info that we have provided). I also think that the Jupp reference is important because it's a quality reference, i.e. expert in demographics, even if it's nothing more than an extrapolation from sample data, that's a demographer's bread and butter! The addition of the Embassy reference is ok as well, because it adds additional info and is slightly more current (and while the Embassy does not represent the quality of an expert demographer as a reference, I wouldn't view it as shabby either). All the figures pass reasonableness checks in my view, i.e. an intelligent reader stumbling across this info would see immediately that the numbers gel. On the other hand, this other figure from the Chilean Govt is problematic - it muddies the waters, it seems a bit unclear as to what it is measuring (only those who have registered?). When one understands why the first wave of Chilean migration occurred in the late 70s, you'd understand that many would not wish to ever formally register anything with the Chilean government. I would see zero merit in showing 4 different numbers.
1043:
believing that two other authors overstate the ancestry, but then it goes on to say that there "are some aspects of Watson's birthright that are worth considering." This is followed by an explanation of why he most likely concealed his ancestry. I think there is a very adequate middle ground that is possible here. To simply and uncritically refer to him as a "Chilean
Australian" is not helpful, but to mention him, and to explain the controversy is both helpful and interesting. Is it possible to do it that way? I believe that would also be a compromise between Matilda's and de la Vida's positions. How about it?
791:
identify with other, sometimes older ancestries. The
Australian 2001 Census reports that 63% of Chilean-born respondents nominated their leading ancestry as Chilean, while others nominated a Spanish (29%), German (3%), Italian (3%) or English (2%) ancestry. According to demographer James Jupp in 2001, the total number of persons born in Chile and their children born in Australia could approach some 40 000 today, but he noted we do not have accurate figures. One 2006 estimate of Chilean-Australians, including third-generation, is as high as 45,000.
433:
294:
1011:... was born on 9 April 1867 at Valparaiso, Chile, son of Johan Christian Tanck and his wife Martha, née Minchin (or Skinner). Tanck was chief officer of the brig Julia which had arrived at Port Chalmers, New Zealand, from Talcahuano, Chile, on 24 December 1865; he married Martha at Port Chalmers on 19 January 1866; they departed in the Julia for Guam on 2 February. On 15 February 1869 at Waipori, New Zealand, Martha Tank married George Thomas Watson; her son Chris became part of her new family.
387:
494:
473:
308:
270:
239:
318:
411:
504:
287:
821:
explanation - and we need to make sure we are clear what are the problems. The
Chilean government seems to be using ABS data. I don't think we serve the reader well by having varying figures out there in cyberspace which are from a reliable source that don't reconcile with our article. Obviously we have to avoid original research in explaining the differences.--
1421:
452:
1327:
980:
Personally I think Watson should be included, especially since there are clearly various ways to define "Chilean
Australian," and since the entry makes it clear at this point that there may even be contemporary people born in Chile, living in Australia, who do not self identify with Chilean ancestry.
941:
As above I would support the inclusion of the extra figures from the
Chilean Government but in a separate paragraph. I can't speak Spanish but can see enough to understand that they are authoritative. I think they need explanation - and we need to make sure we are clear what are the problems. The
594:
On page 18 there is a table Cuadro Nº 5 CHILENOS: RESIDENTES EN OCEANIA POR PAIS where the
Australian figures are País Australia Población nacida en Chile 23.420 Hijos de los nacidos en Chile 10.206 Población Total 33.626 Which I think is saying that of the 33,626 residents in Australia with Chilean
1042:
Actually I think the sources you cite confirm historically another dimension that is also exemplified by the disagreement here, that there is controversy surrounding Watson's ancestry. Unfortunately I don't agree with your assessment about what the sources say. Yes the paper you quote is clear in
626:
Jupp is the second most reliable source we have other than the ABS. I don't think we should forget it. Perhaps we use the ABS self-declared ancestry, the
Goverment figure, and the Jupp estimate. The embassy figure should be considered the least reliable. Note, for instance, that the embassy has
1018:
Throughout his life Watson concealed the fact that he was born Johan
Cristian Tanck in Valparaiso, Chile, in 1867. His father, a ship’s officer, was a Chilean citizen of German birth; his mother was a New Zealander of Irish descent. In their recent biography of Watson, The Man Time Forgot, Grassby
771:
Upon entering this debate (I'm sorry that I did) I thought that self-identification was the nub of the problem, because to go from 23,000 born in Chile to only 25,000 of Chilean descent is impossible over a 30 year period (talking strict demographics). I now undertand that TeePee doesn't like the
663:
The way it works is rather simple, Chilean residents abroad have children, if they choose to and if informed they register their children overseas with the nearest Chilean Embassy or consulate, if they don't than the children aren't accounted for and remain Australian. This works better with first
1210:
I added the reference in, but I agree it appears to be dodgy (I would not consider the presence of advertising to be an issue). The most reliable references I see state "95% of Chileans are either of European or Amerindian background", which is not the same as saying 95% of Chileans are mixed.
1127:
One reference is enough, since there is no dispute over the fact that Watson was born in Chile, when he was born, or to whom he was born. These many references just clutter the entry, and the quantity doesn't add anything positive. Also we wikilink to him main entry where this is all presented
790:
According to the 2006 Australian Census, 23,305 Australians were born in Chile while 25,439 claimed Chilean ancestry, either alone or with another ancestry. However the ancestry figure may not accurately represent the Chilean-Australian population, since persons of Chilean descent often chose to
751:
However the ancestry figure may not accurately represent the Chilean-Australian population, since persons of Chilean descent often chose to identify with other, sometimes older ancestries. The Australian 2001 Census reports that 63% of Chilean-born respondents nominated their leading ancestry as
1030:
of course had a multicultural agenda to push. On the basis of the sources cited I believe it is wrong to describe Watson as a Chilean Australian. In fact the most comprehensive source on Watson's identity quoted as an inline reference rejects the assertion and I think would outweigh any other
997:
The Australian Dictionary of Biography is quite clear that while he was born in Chile (quite possibly in the harbour) his father's ancestry was German, he grew up in New Zealand from a very young age and our own article is very clear he denied any Chilean ancestry. How do you say he is Chilean
660:~The Chilean government PDF file was a study about the number of Chileans living abroad that was conducted in 2003-2004 and was published in 2005. In regards to Australia they base their study by figures gathered from the latest Australian Census of that time and the Chilean National Registry.
820:
Thanks for your patience with this debate. I think your wording is good. However, I would support the inclusion of the extra figures from the Chilean Government but in a separate paragraph. I can't speak Spanish but can see enough to understand that they are authoritative. I think they need
1014:
Of the other refs cited, note 3 states probably (it is the archives again); note 4 - the trade union archives seem merely to be an abbreviated version of the ADB; similarly note 5 - the National Library and Note 6 the national Museum. Note 7 is a paper presented to th 11th Biennal National
947:
According to demographer James Jupp in 2001, the total number of persons born in Chile and their children born in Australia could approach some 40 000 today, but he noted we do not have accurate figures. One 2006 estimate of Chilean-Australians, including third-generation, is as high as
942:
Chilean government seems to be using ABS data. I don't think we serve the reader well by having varying figures out there in cyberspace which are from a reliable source that don't reconcile with our article. Obviously we have to avoid original research in explaining the differences.
998:
Australian? The references do not support the assertion of Chilean ancestry despite the fact that his father, who had little to do with him, was a Chilean citizen I find this an incredible long bow. And I am not the only editor who finds the ethnic category inappropriate.
671:
I gather that both Jupp and the Embassy of Chile in Australia gather a higher number due to the reasoning that they are including third generation Chileans. Since the PDF file is an official Chilean government study it makes for another primary source that we can use.
796:
One question: we then follow up with a sentence on where the largest Chilean communities are living - are those figures for Sydney and Melbourne just those who are Chilean born, i.e. part of the ABS 23,000 figure? If so, is it worthwhile making that clear?
595:
ancestry 23,420 were born in Chile and 10,206 are children of those born in Chile (I don't speak Spanish!). Page 22 has similar figures with reference to census 1996 y 2001 but the bornn to parents born in Chile seems to have dropped from 10,206 -: -->
667:
Like any kind of research there is also a margin of error, for example in this case not every Chilean living abroad was informed about the study or chose not to register their children. Also thirds generation Chileans may not be accounted for.
981:
That said, despite posthumous proof to the contrary, Watson himself claimed another lineage, and there may be some editors who want to include more detail about that. I do not think removing him altogether is the way to go, however.
664:
and second generation Chileans. The 33,625 total is based on the census and registry that you are able to view on page 18. The 33,348 total on page 22 is information that is gathered solely from the 1996 and 2001 Australian Census.
1107:
OK - then I am of a different view - I do not dispute his place of birth, I do dispute that birth place gives an ethnic identity when you spend no time there and your ancestry is not of that place (in this case German and British)
164:
896:
Blessed are the peacemakers - I have no problems with the Chilean Government's inclusion or otherwise. Regarding your question Pippy - yes, the Sydney and Melbourne statistics are for Chilean-born residents only.
950:
If we add the sentence - The Chilean Government has estimated in 2003-04 there were at least 33,626 residents in Australia with Chilean ancestry: 23,420 were born in Chile and 10,206 are children of those born in
730:
I don't see how that supports it either. It supports "persons with Chilean ancestries tend nominate other ancestries" but not the undercount comment. Can you point to a specific statement? And how about this
1234:
article will be added. Kransky, I concur with you that there is still a question of relevancy when discussing the racial makeup of Chileans living in Chile as compared to Chileans living in Australia.
612:
Let us forget about the Jupp estimate, and its questionable use by Ms Nadine. The Chilean Government estimates of around 33,000 sound to be credible, and I would rate the source to be reasonable.
1492:
401:
965:
The removal of Chris Watson as having been born in Chile to a Chilean father was rather abrupt. Even more incredible is the undeniable fact that this article actually provides references.
1497:
1487:
645:
I'm still not sure how the second and third generation Chilean Australians weren't picked up by the 2006 census. After all, they had to fill out a form just like everyone else. --
1142:~If it is undisputed than one reference is definitely enough. His national origin was removed before, thus why extra references were included as to further validate the claim.
158:
1088:~Matilda, the other editor stated that it was unreferenced which is why he took away the claim. If you follow his contribution historial he applied the same method with
396:
280:
853:
I'm going to implement the language suggested above. If AussieLegend or someone else still has issue with the phrasing we can start over on those specific points.
1482:
371:
1024:
Grassby and Ordonez ... extrapolate from this concealment to an overstatement of the significance of Watson’s Chilean background and Australia’s links with Chile
1292:
55:
1174:
Yes that would be the best source for an additional sentence perhaps addressing this. I do note that the mention of Watson is oddly placed at the moment.
713:
377:
90:
1406:
891:
1502:
1477:
807:
782:
596:
10,018 giving a total of 33,438. I can't understand enough to understand the difference why though assume it is to do with the source of the data.
582:
The question has been asked in an edit comment " Are there multiple such estimates?" Yes - the Chilean Embassy also has 43,000 at another page -
1512:
844:
560:
550:
96:
1517:
1507:
293:
209:
205:
201:
1416:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1008:
although the Australian Dictionary of Biography is more definitive on the place it is also quite clear his parents were intinerant
179:
1239:
1147:
1097:
970:
927:
677:
526:
146:
1078:. It is a debate that is rather difficult and needs a big picture discussion but Watson is part of that discussion perhaps. --
347:
334:
275:
110:
41:
115:
31:
1293:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110901002347/http://www.chilesomostodos.gov.cl/descargas/cat_view/50-registro-de-chilenos.html
286:
85:
757:
Does that do it or is there still a problem? Do you think it is important to mention the issue with self-identification?
1458:
1371:
250:
1334:
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
1235:
1143:
1093:
1063:
The issue of ethnic identity is one that has come up in several articles - most recently in a debate about what is an
966:
923:
673:
517:
478:
76:
1015:
Conference of the Australian Historical Association Brisbane 3-7 July 2002 and discusses identity - the paper states
734:"The 2001 Australian Census recorded 23,370 Chile-born persons in Australia." That citation is to a 2006 document. --
697:
Maybe I'm missing something but how, exactly, does the citation used support that claim? I don't see that it does. --
140:
1296:
1197:
196:
1407:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080622010408/http://www.chile.com:80/tpl/articulo/detalle/ver.tpl?cod_articulo=68730
1161:
discussed above is very useful for discussing the issues beyond the bare facts and dealing with various sources.--
748:
Removed the 2001 mention and added the correct 2006 figure instead. How do you feel about this language instead?
218:
136:
1123:
Selcciones de la Vida, I would suggest that you please stop adding references for the exact same fact that is
906:
862:
238:
886:
839:
802:
777:
1449:
1398:
1362:
1284:
867:
The revised wording, as it stands now, seems much improved. It's far less prone to any misinterpretation. --
120:
694:"However this may be an undercount, since persons with Chilean ancestries tend nominate other ancestries."
590:- the 245 page pdf has different figures which seem to me to be 10,000 lower in its estimates. As above:
186:
872:
739:
702:
650:
1212:
1006:
1433:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1346:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
256:
1410:
1397:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1283:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
882:
835:
798:
773:
1317:
1179:
1133:
1048:
986:
858:
762:
721:
632:
752:
Chilean, while others nominated a Spanish (29%), German (3%), Italian (3%) or English (2%) ancestry.
432:
1390:
1276:
172:
66:
35:
525:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1064:
343:
223:
152:
81:
583:
442:
1434:
1347:
1157:
One ref is enough - I bleive the ADB woud do.Plus if issues of identity are discussed then the
1258:
1220:
902:
868:
735:
698:
646:
617:
62:
323:
220:
1441:
1354:
1158:
1175:
1129:
1044:
982:
922:~The content of the article is much stronger and the various sources are being presented.
854:
758:
717:
628:
1005:
I note also that the National Archives only state "probably born in Valparaiso, Chile"
17:
1440:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1353:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1471:
712:
The citation was misplaced, and should go on the sentence before it. If you look at
386:
1254:
1216:
1201:
1162:
1109:
1079:
1068:
1032:
952:
898:
822:
613:
601:
600:
I assume the difference is the inclusion of third generation Chilean-Australians.--
509:
1297:
http://www.chilesomostodos.gov.cl/descargas/cat_view/50-registro-de-chilenos.html
493:
472:
307:
269:
222:
1463:
1376:
1262:
1243:
1224:
1204:
1183:
1165:
1151:
1137:
1112:
1101:
1089:
1082:
1072:
1052:
1035:
1027:
990:
974:
955:
931:
876:
825:
766:
743:
725:
706:
681:
654:
636:
621:
604:
499:
410:
313:
1200:- no authority for assertions - seems to be plastered with advertisements. --
1092:
who is Australian but of immediate Chilean descent when that wasn't sourced.
339:
1428:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
423:
1411:
http://www.chile.com/tpl/articulo/detalle/ver.tpl?cod_articulo=68730
1215:
could be used - but really, is this relevant to Chilean Australians?
1231:
522:
1230:~Agree that a better reference can be used. A source from the
232:
224:
26:
1196:
Nationbynation.com would not appear to meet the guideline on
584:
http://www.embachile-australia.com/en/community/chileans.html
1302:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
431:
409:
385:
1401:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1287:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
787:
So the para in question might look something like this?:
1394:
1280:
1076:
999:
716:, which is #6 in that version, that's the relevant one.
586:. The reference being discussed above in the section
171:
521:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1022:The paper is quite clear that the author believes
376:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1493:Mid-importance Demographics of Australia articles
338:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
44:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1498:WikiProject Demographics of Australia articles
1488:Start-Class Demographics of Australia articles
346:. If you would like to participate, visit the
185:
8:
961:A little quick on the trigger - Chris Watson
1075:? I think not and I am not the only editor
236:
1389:I have just modified one external link on
1275:I have just modified one external link on
467:
264:
1071:or her daughter an African Australian?
588:Another source to be taken into account
469:
266:
1335:
627:also estimated 43,000 on another page.
1483:Unknown-importance Australia articles
1314:to let others know (documentation at
881:Is it too early to thank Christ? :]
397:WikiProject Demographics of Australia
7:
515:This article is within the scope of
255:It is of interest to the following
34:for discussing improvements to the
418:Need help improving this article?
25:
1393:. Please take a moment to review
1279:. Please take a moment to review
1249:call me peverse or masochistic...
937:Adding in Chilean Government data
1419:
1325:
502:
492:
471:
450:
316:
306:
292:
285:
268:
237:
56:Click here to start a new topic.
578:Demography - multiple estimates
555:This article has been rated as
356:Knowledge:WikiProject Australia
1503:WikiProject Australia articles
1478:Start-Class Australia articles
1192:dubious ref Nationbynation.com
446:can be contacted via email to
359:Template:WikiProject Australia
1:
1513:Low-importance Chile articles
1377:04:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
529:and see a list of open tasks.
458:for non-editorial assistance.
424:National Library of Australia
394:This article is supported by
53:Put new text under old text.
834:Yes, I accept your points.
1464:06:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
535:Knowledge:WikiProject Chile
443:Wikimedia Australia chapter
61:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1534:
1518:WikiProject Chile articles
1508:Start-Class Chile articles
1386:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1272:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1198:Knowledge:Reliable sources
561:project's importance scale
538:Template:WikiProject Chile
378:project's importance scale
1128:clearly as well. Thanks.
554:
487:
451:
439:
417:
393:
375:
301:
263:
91:Be welcoming to newcomers
1263:10:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
1244:23:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1225:03:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1205:00:55, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
1184:18:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1166:18:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1152:18:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1138:18:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1113:18:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1102:18:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1083:18:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1053:18:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1036:17:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
991:13:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
975:11:54, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
956:18:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
932:12:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
907:04:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
892:03:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
877:03:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
863:01:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
845:01:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
826:00:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
808:00:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
783:00:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
767:20:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
744:20:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
726:19:01, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
707:18:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
682:20:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
655:18:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
637:17:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
622:15:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
605:14:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
344:Australia-related topics
1382:External links modified
1268:External links modified
1125:not disputed by anyone.
332:is within the scope of
18:Talk:Chilean Australian
1236:Selecciones de la Vida
1144:Selecciones de la Vida
1094:Selecciones de la Vida
1021:
1013:
967:Selecciones de la Vida
924:Selecciones de la Vida
674:Selecciones de la Vida
436:
414:
390:
245:This article is rated
86:avoid personal attacks
1253:...but I miss TeePee
1016:
1009:
435:
413:
389:
335:WikiProject Australia
111:Neutral point of view
116:No original research
1391:Chilean Australians
1306:parameter below to
1277:Chilean Australians
1213:Demography of Chile
1211:Some statistics on
1119:Too many references
330:Chilean Australians
36:Chilean Australians
1452:InternetArchiveBot
1365:InternetArchiveBot
1065:African Australian
945:We currently have
437:
415:
391:
362:Australia articles
251:content assessment
97:dispute resolution
58:
889:
842:
805:
780:
690:A small question.
575:
574:
571:
570:
567:
566:
518:WikiProject Chile
466:
465:
462:
461:
231:
230:
77:Assume good faith
54:
16:(Redirected from
1525:
1462:
1453:
1426:
1423:
1422:
1375:
1366:
1337:
1332:
1329:
1328:
1321:
887:
840:
803:
778:
543:
542:
539:
536:
533:
512:
507:
506:
505:
496:
489:
488:
483:
475:
468:
457:
456:wikimedia.org.au
455:
454:
453:
364:
363:
360:
357:
354:
326:
324:Australia portal
321:
320:
319:
310:
303:
302:
297:
296:
295:
290:
289:
288:
283:
272:
265:
248:
242:
241:
233:
225:
190:
189:
175:
106:Article policies
27:
21:
1533:
1532:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1468:
1467:
1456:
1451:
1424:
1420:
1399:this simple FaQ
1384:
1369:
1364:
1330:
1326:
1315:
1285:this simple FaQ
1270:
1251:
1194:
1121:
963:
939:
692:
580:
540:
537:
534:
531:
530:
508:
503:
501:
481:
449:
447:
420:Ask a Librarian
361:
358:
355:
352:
351:
322:
317:
315:
291:
284:
278:
249:on Knowledge's
246:
227:
226:
221:
132:
127:
126:
125:
102:
72:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1531:
1529:
1521:
1520:
1515:
1510:
1505:
1500:
1495:
1490:
1485:
1480:
1470:
1469:
1446:
1445:
1438:
1414:
1413:
1405:Added archive
1383:
1380:
1359:
1358:
1351:
1300:
1299:
1291:Added archive
1269:
1266:
1250:
1247:
1228:
1227:
1193:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1169:
1168:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1086:
1085:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1002:
1001:
994:
993:
962:
959:
938:
935:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
848:
847:
829:
828:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
794:
793:
792:
785:
755:
754:
753:
732:
691:
688:
686:
658:
657:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
598:
597:
579:
576:
573:
572:
569:
568:
565:
564:
557:Low-importance
553:
547:
546:
544:
541:Chile articles
527:the discussion
514:
513:
497:
485:
484:
482:Low‑importance
476:
464:
463:
460:
459:
438:
428:
427:
416:
406:
405:
402:Mid-importance
392:
382:
381:
374:
368:
367:
365:
328:
327:
311:
299:
298:
273:
261:
260:
254:
243:
229:
228:
219:
217:
216:
213:
212:
192:
191:
129:
128:
124:
123:
118:
113:
104:
103:
101:
100:
93:
88:
79:
73:
71:
70:
59:
50:
49:
46:
45:
39:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1530:
1519:
1516:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1506:
1504:
1501:
1499:
1496:
1494:
1491:
1489:
1486:
1484:
1481:
1479:
1476:
1475:
1473:
1466:
1465:
1460:
1455:
1454:
1443:
1439:
1436:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1417:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1387:
1381:
1379:
1378:
1373:
1368:
1367:
1356:
1352:
1349:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1323:
1319:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1273:
1267:
1265:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1248:
1246:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1203:
1199:
1191:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1167:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1126:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1084:
1081:
1077:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1034:
1029:
1025:
1020:
1012:
1007:
1004:
1003:
1000:
996:
995:
992:
988:
984:
979:
978:
977:
976:
972:
968:
960:
958:
957:
954:
949:
943:
936:
934:
933:
929:
925:
908:
904:
900:
895:
894:
893:
890:
884:
880:
879:
878:
874:
870:
866:
865:
864:
860:
856:
852:
851:
850:
849:
846:
843:
837:
833:
832:
831:
830:
827:
824:
819:
818:
809:
806:
800:
795:
789:
788:
786:
784:
781:
775:
770:
769:
768:
764:
760:
756:
750:
749:
747:
746:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
728:
727:
723:
719:
715:
714:this citation
711:
710:
709:
708:
704:
700:
695:
689:
687:
684:
683:
679:
675:
669:
665:
661:
656:
652:
648:
644:
638:
634:
630:
625:
624:
623:
619:
615:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
603:
593:
592:
591:
589:
585:
577:
562:
558:
552:
549:
548:
545:
528:
524:
520:
519:
511:
500:
498:
495:
491:
490:
486:
480:
477:
474:
470:
445:
444:
434:
430:
429:
425:
421:
412:
408:
407:
403:
400:(assessed as
399:
398:
388:
384:
383:
379:
373:
370:
369:
366:
349:
345:
341:
337:
336:
331:
325:
314:
312:
309:
305:
304:
300:
282:
277:
274:
271:
267:
262:
258:
252:
244:
240:
235:
234:
215:
214:
211:
207:
203:
200:
198:
194:
193:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
131:
130:
122:
121:Verifiability
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
98:
94:
92:
89:
87:
83:
80:
78:
75:
74:
68:
64:
63:Learn to edit
60:
57:
52:
51:
48:
47:
43:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1450:
1447:
1427:
1418:
1415:
1388:
1385:
1363:
1360:
1339:
1333:
1324:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1301:
1274:
1271:
1252:
1229:
1195:
1141:
1124:
1122:
1087:
1069:Marcia Hines
1023:
1017:
1010:
964:
946:
944:
940:
921:
869:AussieLegend
736:AussieLegend
699:AussieLegend
696:
693:
685:
670:
666:
662:
659:
647:AussieLegend
599:
587:
581:
556:
516:
510:Chile portal
440:
419:
395:
348:project page
333:
329:
281:Demographics
257:WikiProjects
195:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
105:
30:This is the
1318:Sourcecheck
1159:Hearn paper
247:Start-class
159:free images
42:not a forum
1472:Categories
1459:Report bug
1372:Report bug
1176:PelleSmith
1130:PelleSmith
1090:Nick Carle
1073:Billy Blue
1045:PelleSmith
1031:source. --
1028:Al Grassby
983:PelleSmith
855:PelleSmith
759:PelleSmith
718:PelleSmith
629:PelleSmith
1442:this tool
1435:this tool
1355:this tool
1348:this tool
1336:|checked=
883:πιππίνυ δ
836:πιππίνυ δ
799:πιππίνυ δ
774:πιππίνυ δ
353:Australia
340:Australia
276:Australia
99:if needed
82:Be polite
32:talk page
1448:Cheers.—
1361:Cheers.—
951:Chile.--
197:Archives
67:get help
40:This is
38:article.
1395:my edit
1304:checked
1281:my edit
1255:Kransky
1217:Kransky
1202:Matilda
1163:Matilda
1110:Matilda
1080:Matilda
1033:Matilda
953:Matilda
948:45,000.
899:Kransky
823:Matilda
614:Kransky
602:Matilda
559:on the
422:at the
165:WP refs
153:scholar
1312:failed
888:(dica)
841:(dica)
804:(dica)
779:(dica)
253:scale.
137:Google
1232:Chile
1067:- is
532:Chile
523:Chile
479:Chile
180:JSTOR
141:books
95:Seek
1340:true
1308:true
1259:talk
1240:talk
1221:talk
1180:talk
1148:talk
1134:talk
1098:talk
1049:talk
987:talk
971:talk
928:talk
903:talk
873:talk
859:talk
763:talk
740:talk
731:one:
722:talk
703:talk
678:talk
651:talk
633:talk
618:talk
448:help
441:The
342:and
173:FENS
147:news
84:and
1409:to
1338:to
1322:).
1310:or
1295:to
551:Low
372:???
187:TWL
1474::
1320:}}
1316:{{
1261:)
1242:)
1223:)
1182:)
1150:)
1136:)
1108:--
1100:)
1051:)
1026:.
989:)
973:)
930:)
905:)
885:-
875:)
861:)
838:-
801:-
776:-
765:)
742:)
724:)
705:)
680:)
653:)
635:)
620:)
404:).
279::
208:,
204:,
167:)
65:;
1461:)
1457:(
1444:.
1437:.
1425:Y
1374:)
1370:(
1357:.
1350:.
1331:N
1257:(
1238:(
1219:(
1178:(
1146:(
1132:(
1096:(
1047:(
985:(
969:(
926:(
901:(
871:(
857:(
761:(
738:(
720:(
701:(
676:(
649:(
631:(
616:(
563:.
426:.
380:.
350:.
259::
210:3
206:2
202:1
199::
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
69:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
