Talk:Chinese Democracy - Knowledge (XXG)

3002:

of the article from top to bottom, with which this second opinion would need to agree. Even if one looks at the lede by itself, which should be a straightforward summary of the article, then one finds sentences such as: "In 1994, Guns N' Roses' progress on a follow-up to "The Spaghetti Incident?" was halted due to creative differences between members band." This seems wordy for the lede and appears to be the equivalent of "Guns N' Roses progress on "Chinese Democracy" was halted due to creative differences between band members." Calvin999 has already listed many such prose issues. A very modest suggestion would be to call for a simple re-draft of the full article in straightforward prose to enhance readability of the narrative. There is a very substantial citations section for the article which should make this easier to accomplish for the nominating editor. Cheers.

3837:{{multiple image |total_width = 900 | align = center | footer = bassist ], keyboardist ], keyboardist ], lead guitarist ], drummer ] and vocalist ] (along with rhythm guitarist ], not pictured) were the first lineup of the band to start production on the album. | width1 = 353 | height1 = 666 | image1 = Download Feastival 2006 -Stinson (cropped).jpg | width2 = 224 | height2 = 349 | image2 = Guns N' Roses (48) (cropped).JPG | width3 = 572 | height3 = 800 | image3 = Dizzy_reed.jpg | width4 = 430 | height4 = 748 | image4 = Download Feastival 2006 -1 (cropped).jpg | width5 = 1042 | height5 = 1650 | image5 = The Vandals 2011-12-18 06 (cropped).JPG | width6 = 220 | height6 = 300 | image6 = AxlRose_cropped.jpg }} 1712:

pegged nu-metal as a kind of 'it's an aggressive hard rock but with experimenting around with different genres' thing, and with the grunge influences & heavy amount of synths mixed with the hard rock & electronic bits, I guess the album could be described as having bits of numetal in it. If it's sourced I don't see the point in removing it, even if I don't completely agree with it. It's pretty subjective, like how Sebastian Bach described Sorry as "doom metal". Also, I'm trying to find a good reference to sum up the songs that don't really fit in the 'hard rock/industrial/electronic/numetal" vibe like the piano ballads such as Street of Dreams and This I Love.

1589:'s search.) For example, The song Chinese Democracy's credited to Rose and Freese in the album booklet, but it's registered writers on ASCAP are Rose, Freese, Eric Caudieux, Caram Castanzo, Robin Finck, Dizzy Reed, Tommy Stinson, Paul Tobias as well as a separate listing for Marco Bellatrami. Album booklets are notoriously inaccurate, and ASCAP lists the people actually registered as song writers via their respective publishing & royalty companies. Should I keep the section as is, essentially providing false or incomplete information, add another part explaining the registered composers or replace what's there with the info from Ascap? 3855:{{multiple image |total_width = 900 | align = center | footer = Lead guitarist ], rhythm guitarist ], drummer ], drummer ] and lead guitarist ] all joined the band at various points during production and worked on the album | width1 = 353 | height1 = 666 | image1 = Bucketheadgnr.jpg | width2 = 224 | height2 = 349 | image2 =Richard Fortus 2013.jpg | width3 = 572 | height3 = 800 | image3 = Primus copenhagen 1998 (cropped).jpg | width4 = 430 | height4 = 748 | image4 = Guns n´Roses Palacio de los Deportes 30-11-2016 (31366316670) (cropped).jpg | width5 = 1042 | height5 = 1650 | image5 = Ron Thal 2013.jpg }} 4626:"I think the record had turned into a real labor. He was stuck and didn’t know how to proceed, so he was avoiding it." - the Daily Mail is banned on Knowledge (XXG) where prose relating to living people are concerned. This source is used for several paragraphs in this section and needs to be replaced. Mick Wall is also known for being a controversial journalist whose opinion is not particularly reliable enough for a GA (and would be tossed out at a Featured Article review). 693: 672: 1094: 2914:) is the evidence. I uploaded a certification table with the very few certifications that i found. It would be great if someone with the knowledge could erase the blabbermouth lies in the commercial section and re-do my certification table with the actual certifications and properly cited sources. Thanks for your time and i hope that if this should not be here, someone could move it and not just erase it and let the lies intact. 626: 601: 555: 530: 227: 431: 480: 1048: 462: 976: 1393:

the band took with the album's lead single. Not sure what you mean by "can you search for the albums lyrics". Sometime in the next few days here I'm gonna make one final big push in expanding the article, I plan on mostly expanding the music & recording sections to mention things like the 15 studios, other albums recorded concurrently to CD (CD 2, the remix album), and some other stuff.

955: 401: 4225: 2910:

blabbermouth as source about that Chinese Democracy have been certified with LOTS of sales in different countries. But most of them are not true. It says that Chinese Democracy have a x3 Platinium certification in Canada, but thats nuts, because CD is not even Gold there. A 1 minute search in Google and at the canadian album certificartion page for GNR (

2357: 1186: 4643:

the music industry, I think this is a case where it can be used. Can you point me to problems with the article if there are any that prevent it from being used? Either way, I replaced several sources of it with other ones. The first Youth quote, the Geffen sales estimate and the tidbit about listening parties are all that remain from the article now.

2674: 5953:

Thanks, Popcornfud and Ringerfan23 for your efforts to finally bring out the opposing side of Zutaut's accusations that, for years, have troubled those concerned about Buckethead. I understand that a major publication would make a superior reference, but such information is extremely rare, especially

5807:

Today I deleted the following sentences from the end of the second paragraph of the "Tom Zutaut joins" section. "However, the coop caused friction when Buckethead began using it to watch hardcore pornography, disturbing Rose. After one of Rose's dogs defecated in the coop, Buckethead insisted it not

5688:

Just a quick update, I've looked through the whole article. I need to merge your comments with the original (and reply to several of them), which I'll do tomorrow when I'm feeling more awake :-/ .... then we'll have an idea of what work is left. I'm more confident now that the article can be improved

4415:

Its been around for 22 years and has accurate re-publications of interviews, timelines of things, ect. A lot of the info is not readily available (ie, print sources, websites that no longer exist). I'm not the most up-to date on what's considered a reliable source, but most of the info taken from the

3001:

Request for second opinion. This is a difficult one. The bibliography and reference sections are substantial and show a good amount of research put into the citations. This is normally ample enough as a basis for Ga nomination. However Calvin999 is raising multiple points concerning the Prose quality

2988:

I think this needs to go through a peer review really. It's not the job of a GAN reviewer to suggest whole sentences and paragraphs for re-writing and in turn providing re-writes, and that is what I feel like needs doing. It all feels a bit jumbled and messy. That's the problem with this much detail.

2519:

I've been involved in this part. Critics can have different opinions, not all of them will always agree on one; surely you've heard this? Strangely enough, nobody has called it simply "heavy metal" that I can find. Side note: Everyone has come to consensus that GnR are both rock and metal on the main

1662:

I thought I noticed some electronics scattered around here and there, but you're right, it's certainly not the most prevalent thing happening here. "Better" and "Shackler's Revenge" seem like they're good examples of what the reviewer was trying to assert (to me). If there's that little of it here, I

5993:

I've trimmed it down to three paragraphs. I think everyone from GNR who was on the album should be mentioned in the lead , and as it is now I think it does a good job summarizing the article without leaving out any of the important facts. I'm open to suggestions for further trimming if you have any.

5885:

Introduction: Since the mid-2000's former Guns N Roses A&R representative Tom Zutaut has said a number of derogatory things about guitarist Buckethead. Calling him “emotionless”, blaming him for tour cancellations and the delay of the Chinese Democracy album. No other member of Guns N' Roses has

4070:

about the dissolution of the album. If you have any ideas for how to re-combine them, let me know because I messed around with it last night in draft mode and couldn't figure out a good way, the section ended up too choppy and back and forth since the sections have two separate themes (recording and

1711:

I think it should be included because the album's so diverse that 'hard rock' doesn't really define it well enough. Personally, Scraped is the song that really comes to mind in regards to numetal with the opening vocals and Buckethead-yness of the guitars. Shackler's is another one, too. I've always

5402:

It's really hard to find reliable sources on the info of the individual songs. Several prominent reviews don't or barely mention songs on the album. So for example, there might be lots written that can be cited about the style and composition of "Chinese Democracy" or "Better", but there's not that

4642:

Is there some discussion anywhere about Wall in regards to reliability? All I know is he's been doing this since the 70's and has written a biography of Guns N' Roses and Axl Rose before. I know daily mail is generally considered unreliable but considering Wall's history with the group and Rose and

4095:

The "Recording" section begins: "Longtime Guns N' Roses producer Mike Clink was reported to have worked on Chinese Democracy during its conception". When was "its conception"? Is that before or after 1997, when Youth said Rose was not ready? It's really difficult to get a clear sense of time in the

4011:

I wonder if the recording and delays section can be all combined and subsections can be for era's like a band article would be (like Early recordings (97-00) Delays and Member changes (00-06), final recordings and release (06-08) ). It might be untraditional but I think it'd benefit the complicated

1575:

I expanded the lead to include more info on the recording and delays. The nu-metal genre was added back in by an editor who initially added it in the first place, I don't really want to start an edit war over it. Industrial rock genre is supported more by multiple songs on the album being described

5933:

This was a minor issue that came up during the GA Process (or sometime in the past, it's been a while); because a lot of the info from people like Beaven or Brain (which is a large chunk of information not covered by other sources) came from direct interviews they did recently, mostly with obscure

4316:

Anyway, I'm happy to review this. I see a lot of work has gone into it recently, and I suspect there's a campaign to get this to FA at some point, which is no bad thing. I'll have a proper re-read of the article now and check the sources, and come back with detailed comments hopefully later today.

1737:

and I went straight on looking at what could be fixed. And this section was the first thing that really popped out at me. It makes me feel like it's of a lesser quality, which is not what GAs are about. In addition, we need to expand on the genre classification for that section. For example, just

1458:

I tweaked the article a bit more now. Still working on the refs. Unfortunately, several dead links aren't archived anywhere. Not sure what the protocol is for that, whether it's to leave as is, tag with a deadlink tag, or remove. Removed the alternate art as I couldn't find a ref talking about the

1392:

I've cleaned up most of the mechanical stuff mentioned. I'm not sure what else to to with the critical reception section, first it was bloated now it needs expanding, I honestly have no clue how to summarize most reviews without using direct quotes. The audio sample demonstrates the shift in style

1539:

The only dead links left in the article are now tagged with the Dead Link tags, and I'm working on finding replacements for them. I removed the quote from one of the refs, it's in the other one because it's a print source, since there isn't a website to click on to check info from the citation. I

1144:

The article history of Chinesse Democracy was created several years ago in attempt to control the constant flow of rumors and leaks while this album was in it's decades long recording process. I'm not sure how wise a move this was to begin with and now the two articles are basically redundant of

3891:

I don't think the current structure of having Recording and Delays as separate sections works. It means you have to explain certain things twice (like Roy Thomas Baker being hired) and tell the story from beginning to end twice in different ways. Instead I think we should have a single Recording

4423:

and it's not mentioned anywhere. I don't think this source will fly at FAC, but for a GA, provided the reference clearly states it is an interview, and specifies exactly where the original source is, we would be able to trust it. I do know several fansites produce facsimiles of old magazine and

4312:

Crikey, has it been ten years already since this was released? It was a standing joke at one point that it would never happen - where does the time go? I do confess I am not a particularly big fan of Guns 'n' Roses, and my main interest in them recently has been watching video clips of Axl Rose

2909:

No certifications table? IMPORTANT: I tried to make one, but it was erased because some problem with the references (sorry, im no expert). The important thing here is that the certifications and sales information in this page is absolute BS. For example, the commercial performance section cited

1488:

Keep in mind that tool isn't entirely accurate, it doesn't seem to account for dead URL's present in the article that are archived. But I'm looking into alt. sources right now to get that part fixed up. I'm also considering merging the recording and delays section into one single "recording and

1328:

So far, I've expanded the lead & fixed the citations, expanded information on second week and year end sales, removed promos & singles & fixed the refs on the charts section, added an extra source to the Industrial Rock genre and removed Nu-metal, trimmed down the critical reception

4812:

but with the note "Still usable as a WP:PRIMARY source for interviews, or when covered by other reliable sources (though it is preferred if you use the other reference that covers said content)." There's another use if it later on for the info about the song Silkworms, they seem to be the only

5572:

I'm taking a break to go and look at some other things; I'll pick up the rest of the review tomorrow. I have to say I'm not feeling inclined to pass it at this stage as there are serious problems with the referencing. You've done a good job with copyediting the prose; I can't find too much to

5863:

Let's please reconsider leaving in Zutaut's disputed accusations against Buckethead. If we choose to leave them in, then the refutation could also be added for balance. In particular, Zutaut's claim that Buckethead used his "coop" area of the recording studio to watch hardcore pornography is

5811:

Bryan "Brain" Mantia was the drummer for Guns N' Roses on the Chinese Democracy tour and is known as Buckethead's best friend and frequent collaborator. Please watch and listen to the first two minutes of this video. "Are THOSE Buckethead GNR Stories True? Brain sets the record straight!"

1647:

doesn't sound anything like nu metal, or bands like Linkin Park or Limp Bizkit. It doesn't feature rap verses, sampling, or electronic-based instrumentation. Sure, it has some industrial influences (though I think industrial metal could be removed as well), but I think listing nu metal is

4138:

Additionally, in the "Style and composition" section, there are quite a few quotes where third parties describe the album as it sounded while it was in development. These should be moved to the recording section. The "Style and composition" section should only describe the final album.

1771:

I'm closing the review. I believe that a fresh evaluation is needed because the article was significantly expanded since this review started. It went from 70k bytes of information to over a 100k as of this day. While it is broad in its coverage and neutral, it fails the stability

1732:

Something sounds wrong with that section's heading. It seems somehow....inadequate. Something more specific, like style or composition or something like that. I'm in no way a reviewer, but I want to help, and when I returned from vacation, I saw that this album was being reviewed

1444:

It isn't a GA criteria, but you really need to work on the reference formatting. Duff McKagan, Axl Rose and Sebastian Bach have only the first letter capitalized (refs 44, 118, 135). Second thing, Blabbermouth should be Blabbermouth.net, billboard.com and billboard.biz should be

1319:

Not to open a genre debate, but I don't think that the opinion of Dizzy Reed should count as a reliable source. Suggest leaving only hard rock in the infobox because only Rolling Stone explicitly labeled the album as hard rock, unlike The Observer, which says GN'R mimicked Trent

5573:

complain about from that angle, but that's only one facet of the GA criteria - you need to have facts presented with the appropriate balance in an article, and cited to reputable sources. In particular, fan websites are notorious for getting things wrong, and citations like the

1293:

Ok, the most obvious thing that I see from first look is that the lead is desperately short, and does not summarize the entire article. Please expand it and remove all cites from there because the lead should not contain exclusive information (cites should be featured in the

5618:

I've made a lot of fixes to the above things. The issues with citations are a lot of them come from reprinting of unavailable material (either print magazines or websites that are not archived) or interviews with people involved in making the album with more obscure sites.

1576:

as industrial in the reviews & info about them. I don't see the ref formatting problem you were talking about, maybe I'm just looking right past it? I'll put the ALt text on my list of to-do's (I actually have a word file keeping track of this, which is kind of insane.)

5172:

This is personal preference, but for sections of album articles describing the songs (eg: Led Zeppelin IV, The Beatles (album)), I've preferred putting the prose together without sub-headings for each song, except to split into sides of an LP (which doesn't really apply

4746:

Reworded to two albums, Rose mentions here "The second leans probably a little more to aggressive electronica with full guitars, where the first one is definitely more guitar-based." and in other spots the intent to have two (or possibly more) albums from the "Chinese"

1433:

I don't see summaries on the reviews by The Guardian, Mojo, Pitchfork Media, Q, and some others listed in the reception box for details. When you're doing these, please avoid quoting the authors (unless it's something amusing or witty) because the sections reads like a

5816:

YouTube channel NatterNet is interviewing Brain, who disputes the derogatory statements from reference about Buckethead which have been in this Knowledge (XXG) article for years. The statements in question are disturbing and paint an inaccurate picture of Buckethead.

5934:

fansites or youtube channels. While I agree with the general consensus that youtube is not a great source; it's a direct interview with the one of the people that made the album. I do think it should stay as it is now, with the claim's and Brain's dismissals of them.

5848:. We don't really want to get into the weeds with the he-said-she-said stuff. I have restored the contentious information, which is well sourced, and added some in-text attribution ("According to Zutaut...") so we're not just stating it in Knowledge (XXG)'s voice. 4156:

Another thought: we should really have a paragraph, no more than two or three sentences, establishing the background leading up to the album - explaining that they were a hugely successful band with the previous lineup. This sets the stage for the next stuff. See

3911:

I agree about the recording. I just added a bit about Frank Ferrer's recording. There's some information from Background section that can be incorporated. I'm gonna try and scour from interviews from other members, because like half the article is Tommy Stinson

4551:"At the recommendation of Freese, former Replacements bassist Tommy Stinson joined in early 1998, followed by second keyboardist and multi-instrumentalist Chris Pitman" - according to the Blabbermouth source, Pitman was already in the band when Stinson joined. 5477:

Not sure, they've been around since at least 2001 (the copyright date lists 1993). They're a site that compiles tour dates and information. I couldn't find the information anywhere else on the web, and I searched for it for a while. If needed it can be

1787:

The stability criteria is "Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute." The article did not change significantly from day to day because of an edit war or content dispute, it was expanded.

1603:

I usually go with the album's liner notes for credits and personnel, but if you think they are inaccurate, go with the ASCAP. I have the CD with the booklet, and must say, I find it incredibly messy to list different personnel for every track on the

4176:

An issue I'm having right now is finding info that's tagged for clarification on the Final Recording section. I can't find when Costanzo joined the album or when the harpist and conductor worked on it. I would assume mid-00's, but can't find the

4123:

OK, I've restructured it. I think it's an improvement, more or less, but still needs lots of work to make it cohesive and flow well, and there are still lots of tags where things need citations or clarification. Still lots more work to do.

2662:

Personnel and legal reasons, as well as Rose's alleged perfectionism caused the album to be delayed multiple times, including missing an announced March 2007 release date, before being released in November 2008. → Long winded and too many

4191:

Thanks a bunch for taking the time to look. Let's leave it for now; the information may turn up eventually, and there's still work to do elsewhere. In the end, there may be a way to incorporate the information naturally without the

4091:

The "Delays" section begins: "Producer Youth stated that in 1997 Rose was not ready to record the album" - OK, in 1997 what stage was the album at? Had they begun recording yet? You have to cross-reference another section to find

6049:

I tried removing it myself but somehow messed up the table, so I'm writing here instead. There is no such thing as an "Israeli albums chart", and there never was. This is a chart of single store, and is far from being official.

5973:

The lead of this article has really ballooned since I last looked at it. We don't need this extensive list of all the people who joined and left the band in the lead — it should be trimmed back to the more concise version. See

4739:"Rose said in 1999 that the band had recorded enough material for a double album" - the source says "I wouldn't say it's like, you know, that we recorded a double album, or that we have all of our scraps to be the second one." 4057:

The sections where previously split a while back (by me, I think, it's been a while) because of how large the sections are. Most articles don't have sections on Delays, but then again most albums don't have the kind of history

1353:

Check the formatting on the references from Blabbermouth (it should be under "publisher" with the first letter only being capitalized). Also, please check refs 10, 47, 100 because the article titles shouldn't be all in capital

3703: 4034:

That's exactly what I'm proposing. I think it'd be a huge improvement. I don't think it'd "untraditional" either - is there a tradition of separating Delays into a different section for music articles? Don't think so...

5395:

In general, I think the songs suffer from too much opinion and not enough of explaining the background, style or any other significant facts about them. See the two album GAs I referred to at the top of this section.

4612:"In February 1997, electronic producer Moby entered talks to produce" - I'm confused by this. Who was Moby talking to, did he actually produce anything, or was this just an idea thrown around? This needs more context. 153: 2864:

Most paragraphs consist of very short single clause sentences. It makes for a fairly disjointed read because there is no flow or fluidity from one sentence to another. This is particularly evident in the Background

1642:

FasterLouder.com is an Australian blog, which describes itself as "the premier destination for online music debate and discovery with a uniquely Australian perspective". Secondly (this is just my personal opinion),

353: 3988:

Thanks for these links. I think the article has the potential to be great, but right now it's really hard to follow the chronology... I really think we need to straighten out the whole story from beginning to end.

5510:

The paragraph starting "Rose stated in December 2008 that two alternate booklets were pending release, saying" has a quotation that is too long and needs to be trimmed. Also the last sentence in this paragraph is

5954:

because Buckethead is not one to publicly defend himself. There exists a population that follows Buckethead and his collaborators such as Brain, but they are neither mainstream nor powerful. Thank you again. --

1430:

I've noticed that you have several dead links in the references. Check the external links on this page's box (top right) for details. The dead links are in red, and the ones which change domain are in green.

3877:

As you might have noticed, I've been doing some copyediting on this article. I'm not a GnR fan and knew nothing of the history of the album, and it's been interesting learning about it. Two main thoughts:

2936:

is a hard rock/heavy metal webzine. It has been accepted in most cases, but it should be avoided if it's the only one reporting a subject. It's also not allowed for BLP statements. But it's listed on the

1441:

You haven't addressed the issues with the non-free media. Why is the alternative cover needed for and what does the sample demonstrate (I don't see "Chinese Democracy" disscussed anywhere in the article)?

1407:

I'll see what I can help with the reviews. Regarding the lyrics, I wanted to know if there is interpretation or inspiration (song's backround) on the tracks that are not discussed in the music section.--

5021:

From the article "“The ‘Chinese Democracy’ album is very close to being completed,” Merck Mercuriadis, the chief executive officer of Sanctuary Group, which manages Mr. Rose, wrote in a recent statement

1473:

Well, can you find some other sources that report the same information? I wouldn't have made an issue if there were two or three dead links, but having over 20 dead links in a potential GA doesn't seem

4981:

reworked, trimmed. I'm not the best at trimming quotes so a second check would be nice if i did it right. Is there any documentation here on wiki or elsewhere on tips for paraphrasing quotes like that?

1145:

each other. I propose all information be moved to this article -I'm pretty sure it is all here already-- and that article be redirected here where it should be and where it can easily be maintained.

2903:

I'm sure the Personnel could be better organised? You don't need to list each and every engineering assistance separately. Just write Engineering assistance: and list the names separated by commas

5308:

It is, but the issue here is that was not obvious that it was an official or authorised YouTube channel; therefore it must be considered a copyright violation source and cannot be used for a GA.

3833:

I've removed the following images from the article; they are oversized and don't illustrate anything about the album or it's making and thus don't help the reader's understanding of the article.

4088:

One of the reasons it's difficult to merge the sections currently is the same reason why the page is currently difficult to read. It's really difficult to get a sense of the timeline. Examples:

5779: 5403:

much about a super dense song like "There Was a Time" or "I.R.S." (which for example has the longest high note in the entire GNR catalogue but that's not mentioned by any media or reviewers).

4598:"Early in the recording process, the band was reported to have 60 songs in development." - the source given doesn't seem to verify this; I can see a reference to "60 guitars" but not 60 songs 6083: 4711:"By this time Guns N' Roses had recorded over 30 songs" ... "The sessions produced 38 recorded songs" - this needs condensing, it's either "over 30" or "38" but having both together clashes. 3704:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140531190722/http://hiddentracks.org/articles/record-review/in-its-way-it-s-remarkable-like-marillion-s-kayleigh-reimagined-by-a-hysterical-andrew-lloyd-webber/

1532:

You still haven't corrected the charts as explained above. About the proposed merging of the recording and delays sections, I wouldn't do it because those sections are already large enough.

1561:

I thought the genre issue was cleared some weeks ago. Nu metal isn't explicitelly supported by any reference. An author being reminded of Nine Inch Nails doesn't really counts as nu metal.

561: 4099:"Guitarist Richard Fortus said all but his contribution, the chorus to "Better", had been written by the time he joined". When did he join? This information is in a different section... 3882:

It strikes me that there seems to be a lot of information out there on the actual recording history (of which this album has more than most) that isn't in the article yet. For example,

4444:"however, bassist Duff McKagan said the band "was so stoned at that point that nothing got finished"" - the Time Off citation does not seem to work, so I cannot verify this quotation. 2747:

Can I get someone to help me with that part? I've never figured out formatting on charts on tables on wiki and anytime I've tried to edit them I end up just hilariously breaking them.

5871:

Interviewer: "Tom Zutaut said about this porn story, that Buckethead was in the studio watching hardcore pornography to get inspired and Buckethead fans were like 'that's bullshit'."

3707: 5336:

The quote itself is a direct quote from Rose from the alternate CD booklets. I have a copy of that and can verify its correct, and scans can be found online. Replacing it with the

5864:

passionately denied by Brain (that is, Bryan Kei "Brain" Mantia). Brain's interview is well sourced because it is available as an audio track and has also been transcribed here:

1558:

There's a ref foermatting problem in the second paragraph of "Delays". Also, can you expand the lead a little bit with information about the recording and the numerous delays?

5579:

should be avoided like the plague. However, I think it's worth carrying on with the review just to list issues, so you've got a complete set of notes to work off for future.

4457:"Guitarist Slash criticized singer Axl Rose for running the band "like a dictatorship"" - the source says he said it seemed like a dictatorship, which is not quite so strong. 4349:

Reworded, though I think it could be done better. I'm not the best at re-wording stuff (the opening has gone like 20 different variations from copy editors and other editors)

3467: 415: 5215:"one shooter's preference for the Guns song Brownstone to no avail" - the second citation here appears to be to a forum post (same source re-used later on in this section) 147: 5821:

Another reference in support of removing these exact quotes is given in the following video, also by YouTube channel NatterNet. "Is THAT Buckethead Story Just GNR Lies?"

4263: 2788: 2395: 1224: 6123: 6108: 4230: 2362: 1191: 1016: 733: 4471:"Multiple musicians were auditioned, including guitarist Zakk Wylde, and drummers Dave Abbruzzese and Michael Bland." - do we need four citations to cite one sentence?: 3735: 3731: 3717: 3625: 3621: 3607: 3505: 3501: 3487: 3389: 3385: 3371: 3259: 3255: 3241: 3119: 3115: 3101: 2279: 2275: 2261: 1975: 1971: 1957: 1618:

Hey guys. Just wanted to clear it up that nu metal was covered by refs, the only thing is that there's only one reviewer who says so. He has two articles mentioning it

5382:"The lyrics feature Rose singing "So if she’s somewhere near me / I hope to God she hears me"" - why is this important to mention here? Same problem with the next song 4907:"Mantia had the parts transcribed, then played them from a teleprompter before trying the songs again in his style" - the source given does not mention a teleprompter 1323:

You should definitely rearrange the critical reception because it is bloated with quotes. Please summarize some of the reviews, and avoid citing every single reviewer.

5224:

The forum source is a direct link to the chats Axl Rose had with various forums. There are transcripts that can be posted instead if the primary link is frowned upon.

2123: 1372:

How is "Oh My God" related to the album's music when the song is not on the album? I see this is largely disscussed there, but I think it belongs to the background,

4253: 2385: 1214: 6128: 6113: 2888:

Make sure there is appropriate linking, such as Duff McKagan and Gilby Clarke (and more) in the Background section, as this is the first time they are mentioned.

1300:

Can you find informarion such as second week sales in the US, or sales bu the end of 2008 in the US or worldwide? I think that section is not entirely researched.

3966:. I don't have the time at the moment to transcribe or listen to any of these audio interviews so I'm listing them here, they probably have good details in them. 3021: 992: 743: 535: 5909:

Another editor might still remove it. If you can find a better source from a more reputable website (like Rolling Stone or something) then that would be great.

3473: 79: 5635:

Also paging several users who have reviewed or commented in past GANs, or worked on the article in the past to see what they think or what can be improved. :

3024:

go through it. As a result, I'm failing this article. If you do one of the aforementioned suggestions, then this should be able to pass third time around. —

2093: 6118: 6103: 4974:"What really happened was the record company stood back and left...." - this quotation is far too long and is a borderline copyvio, can it be paraphrased?: 1072: 2792: 2784: 5414:

Okay, it's possible nobody's written the definitive G'n'R biography yet, and until that happens, obviously you can't write about what isn't in source.

4450:

I'll look into finding an alternate source. The archive worked when I added it way back when, but it's not working now, so idk what's going on with it.

44: 2776: 2656:

I feel like the opening of the second para in the lead is coming too late. The lead needs restructuring. It should reflect the layout of the article.

1026: 983: 960: 4892:"very digital sounding, there wasn’t a lot of air moving, they were electronic sounding" - the source given does not appear to have this quotation. 2894:

The fourth para of the same section has an overload of citations after the genres. There shouldn't be that many citations lumped together like that.

3708:

http://hiddentracks.org/articles/record-review/in-its-way-it-s-remarkable-like-marillion-s-kayleigh-reimagined-by-a-hysterical-andrew-lloyd-webber/

709: 85: 5808:

be cleaned up as he liked the smell. After three days, the smell had become overwhelming and the studio staff removed it, upsetting Buckethead."

1622: 5207: 2938: 1378:

I'd avoid structures like "current Guns N' Roses members" because they seem to frequently change over the years and will require regular update.

632: 606: 5886:

spoken of Tom Zutauts claims until now. Today, Bryan 'Brain' Mantia, who was the drummer for Guns N Roses at the time, sets the record straight.

5002:"By 2005, Geffen had removed Chinese Democracy from its release schedule and withdrawn funding, stating:" - the statement is from 2004, not 2005 4235: 2367: 1196: 2129: 256: 6088: 5772: 1585:

Also, I have a question regarding the songwriting credits. The credits from the booklet vary greatly from the actual registered credits (via

6133: 4898:

The full quote is from the video, the article just has a few brief points. Not sure if it's still there, but a full transcript can be found

4865:

The link criteria says "readers will expect this type of media in the article". I really don't think that can be justified in this instance

1329:

section, expanded the music section to discuss some of the songs on the album including the title track. Let me know what else can be done.

1056: 6098: 5905:

The problem is, while I'm sure that's a real interview, it's not a good source by Knowledge (XXG) standards. For now I've added this text:

3468:

http://www.timeoff.com.au/index.php?area=Interviews&pg=38&subarea=38&sel=6127&PHPSESSID=b1255c323c0977e85e64fe287a9f7654%3D

3020:. I'm going to stick with what I originally suggested: that this would be better of going through a peer review or having someone from the 2883: 1297:

Why is there an audio sample in the track listing? As far as I know, they should be featured if a certain song is discussed in the article.

1153: 30: 4424:

journal pieces, and provided the original reference is stated, the source is verifiable as being factually accurate and not just made up.

2069: 496: 6051: 1939: 1933: 6073: 2780: 700: 677: 2139: 1624:. The second one seems to have some stronger support, but the only place they mention it in the first one was when they talked about " 4258: 2390: 1366:

The critical reception should definitely be expanded. There are many reviews on this album and you can try paraphrasing some of them.

1219: 244: 99: 3896:

I may make these changes myself if I continue to read about the history of the album, but there's no guarantee of that happening...

3713:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

3603:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

3483:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

2874:

It's a very large article which a lot of detail. Couldn't some parts be trimmed down and told more concisely? Just streamlined more.

1619: 5297:

Is it possible to source a quote from a concert. If you see the video it's clearly Axl Rose explaining the meaning behind the song.

4899: 3943: 2868:

Paragraphs significantly vary in length. Some sections have two or three line paragraphs, followed by a five or six line paragraph.

1667:

I thought they had a professional review there...but then again, that nu metal was mentioned before the interview with Dizzy Reed.

104: 20: 6093: 5756: 5720: 5697: 5587: 5555: 5497: 5422: 5316: 5245: 5033: 4832: 4666: 4533: 4432: 4325: 4302: 2124:

http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2008/10/22/guns-n-roses-management-officially-announce-chinese-democracy-release/

1115: 1111: 1107: 296: 198: 194: 190: 3337: 2897:

I don't think there's a need for five sub-sections in Controversy and lawsuits. Surely this can be amalgamated more efficiently?

238: 168: 74: 5712:

I think we're making progress. I've made some further comments on sources and once those are resolved, I think we'll be there.

4697:"I came in, to start, making sounds for Robin Finck...." - this quotation is overly long and needs to be trimmed or paraphrased 4342:" - for context, it would help explain who these people are (ie: founding members or people playing on the last studio release) 2434: 1459:

alternate covers, expanded on the sample in it's description box to validate it's existence. Infobox refs are gone now as well.

1263: 491:, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the 2512:

How can the album be three types of rock and one type of metal? I find it concerning when info boxes list more than one genre.

2195: 492: 487: 467: 442: 135: 3593: 3583: 3474:

https://web.archive.org/web/20081216150505/http://www.fimi.it/classifiche_result_artisti.php?anno=2008&mese=11&id=209

3207: 1312: 1273:

I'll be glad to review the most expensive rock album in history that reached mythical proportions. Comments to follow soon.--

2763: 65: 5526: 2341:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1170:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

4540:

that's weird, control+F failed me earlier. anyways, that's a reprint of an interview Vrenna did that's lost to time. -RF23

3042:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2094:

http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2007/09/26/proof-axl-rose-does-go-to-the-studio-photo-with-sebastian-bach/

1834:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1517:

Ref 112 is not properly formatted. If you don't know the author, drop it. Also, the "website" field should be filled with

5015:"Around that time, manager Merck Mercuriadis said the album was close to complete" - the source doesn't seem to say this 6078: 5787: 5343: 5117: 4920:"In the early 2000s, composers Marco Beltrami and Paul Buckmaster...." - the source given doesn't seem to have this date 3778: 3668: 3548: 3432: 3302: 3007: 1625: 2772: 2149: 1068: 1802:

I'd nominate it again and see what another reviewer thinks, Ringer. If you don't wish to re-nominate, I'd be glad to.

3477: 2925:

What is the reliability of "Blabbermouth" for example? I've never heard of it and it doesn't sound terribly reliable.

1350:

I've noticed many "&" in the lead, which aren't encyclopedical. Please check if the rest of the article has more.

5959: 5895: 5833: 4281: 2413: 1807: 1743: 1672: 1633: 1529:

should be placed in the "publisher" field. Also check refs such as 40, 104, 138, for capital letters in the titles.

1242: 372: 334: 315: 185: 129: 1696:. You have a point, nu metal can be heard here and there, but it doesn't seem like the album's definitive genre.-- 1369:

The song titles should be in quote marks, not italicized. There are many errors of this kind in the music section.

1047: 109: 4158: 2932:

Your work that I've seen appears only to pertain to pop music, mostly. That would explain why you don't know it.

5606: 4809: 4416:

website is reprinting of previous published material, which I think is allowed (please correct me if I'm wrong)

4277: 3734:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

3624:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

3504:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

3388:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

3258:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

3118:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2871:

Avoid single sentence sections, such as Censorship in the People's Republic of China and Awards and nominations.

2409: 2278:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

2111: 2105: 1974:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1238: 1124: 207: 4142:

I also notice the article mentions a few leaks, but doesn't go into detail. More detail is needed about these.

3861: 3846: 3793:

I believe the limit is 10; I count 11. One should be chosen to be removed and just mentioned in prose instead.

2972:

The first time a magazine/paper etc (i.e. work or publisher is mentioned) it needs to be linked. None here are.

1519: 1363:

Can you also remove the references from the infobox and elaborate on recording and music in the article's body?

1304: 2087: 1387:

What's the purpose of the alternative cover in the infobox? I haven't seen it being disscussed in the article.

448: 410: 125: 6055: 5368:

The song "Madagascar" is cited to a scan of the CD inlay. This is a copyright violation, use a proper source.

4808:

the article includes a reprint of an interview Fortus did with Social Magazine. It's listed as unreliable on

1738:

saying it's nu metal with a citation doesn't mean that makes for good quality. End of rant, please consider.

5783: 5644: 3769: 3695: 3659: 3575: 3539: 3459: 3423: 3329: 3293: 3187: 3063: 3017: 3003: 1381:

Also check the overlinking issue in the article. I see you've got Axl Rose linked several times in the body.

2130:

https://web.archive.org/20100724113249/http://www.ifpi.org:80/content/section_news/plat_month_20090129.html

1316:

on how to organise the chart section. Refs are next to the chart name and move the year in the first field.

1080:

The rationale behind the request is: "Long-gestating album with lots of coverage by high-selling artist.".

637: 611: 566: 540: 4879:"Shortly afterwards, Josh Freese left to join...." - why do you need five citations to cite one sentence? 3840:

The second set contains images that might be useful as singles or in a gallery; I probably should re-read

3691: 1886: 5453:

indicated they have an actual team, so it's not a self-published site. I'm not 100% sure about it though.

3841: 2189: 1435: 175: 55: 6035: 5999: 5955: 5939: 5891: 5829: 5736: 5676: 5640: 5624: 4197: 4182: 4166: 4147: 4129: 4109: 4076: 4040: 4017: 3994: 3971: 3951: 3934: 3917: 3901: 3818: 3795: 3753:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3741: 3643:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3631: 3523:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3511: 3407:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3395: 3277:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3265: 3157: 3137:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3125: 2943: 2752: 2707: 2683: 2594: 2554: 2522: 2487: 2455: 2317: 2297:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

2285: 2081: 2013: 1993:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1981: 1823: 1803: 1793: 1739: 1717: 1668: 1629: 1594: 1545: 1494: 1464: 1398: 1334: 1154:

http://www.fasterlouder.com.au/features/35134/Guns-N-Roses-Dizzy-Reed-Im-very-proud-of-Chinese-Democracy

1064: 991:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

708:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

226: 3694:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3574:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3458:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3328:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3186:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3062:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2989:

If it's not done right it's hard to read and people lose interest. I'm asking for a second opinion. —

2911: 2070:

http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2008/08/14/guns-n-roses-shacklers-revenge-hits-the-web/

1540:

cleaned up the capitalization in the refs. Still working on the chart section and more ref formatting.

70: 4934:"I met with Axl and he played me these songs..." - the quotation here is over-long, can it be trimmed? 6013: 5983: 5922: 5853: 5754: 5718: 5695: 5585: 5553: 5495: 5420: 5314: 5291:

There was a citation to a YouTube video here which looks like a copyright violation, I've removed it

5243: 4830: 4664: 4654:"? Anyway, if the source has been replaced then that's sorted. I've tagged a few instances where the 4531: 4430: 4323: 4296: 3362: 3232: 3092: 1940:

http://web.gunsnroses.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20080326&content_id=a1&vkey=news&fext=.jsp

1934:

http://web.gunsnroses.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20070222&content_id=a1&vkey=news&fext=.jsp

1447: 5845: 2167: 2133: 874: 835: 248: 5652: 2428: 2140:

https://web.archive.org/20100729114236/http://www.ifpi.org:80/content/section_news/ifpi_awards.html

1777: 1758: 1701: 1653: 1609: 1479: 1412: 1278: 1257: 803: 161: 5266:"The song features the lyrics “What this means to me...." - why is this important to mention here? 4725:"In late November 1999, Rose played several tracks..." - the rest of this paragraph is unsourced : 3926: 2941:

list, so it seems okay. They just don't list authors, which raises skepticism in a lot of people.

1692:

I'll leave the final word to Ringerfan23. I know it's hard to believe, but that's how the website

1375:

Can you search for the album's lyrics? Also, I prefer to describe the songs per the track listing.

3195: 2828: 2800: 2453:

Okay, this is ridiculous. Calvin, are you ever going to do this? It's now been over three weeks.

1130: 858: 212: 5664: 5660: 3738: