531:. The Booker decision merely applied the Apprendi v. New Jersey and Blakely v. Washington decisions to sentences enhanced pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Apprendi and Blakely held that “ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” In other words, if a guy gets convicted by a jury for possessing ten pounds of cocaine, the Court can't come back at sentencing and make a finding that the guy actually had 100 pounds of cocaine and give him a longer sentence because of the additional cocaine. Booker had nothing to do with mandatory minimum sentences, and such sentences -- especially those that impose a mandatory life sentence under so-called "three strikes" laws remain a highly relevant topic of discussion. The discussion should be restored. --
683:
for personal opinions, experiences, or arguments. Nor is it a soapbox..." So if you're trying to say "let's list cell block H as an example of cruel and unusual punishment" then sure, this is the place to discuss that, in the context of whether it fits the article, how to modify it, etc. If you just want to talk about cruel and unusual punishment, this is not the proper forum. Note the talk page header that says "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cruel and unusual punishment article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject." Re the paragraphs in question, if youre goal is to include them in the article, then I'd suggest finding some good sources for them, this would go a long way toward ensuring their inclusion.
636:... to severest form of maximum security incarceration, which would mostly be considered surely "cruel and unusual" ... as Oklahoma's "H" (or Hell) block which is underground where inmates never ever receive any sunlight ever; and where inmates are allowed out of their small cells only once a month for 30 minutes of exercise. (contrast US prison history of the past, where usual confinement in maximum security prisons was where the entire block of cells faced a wall of windows allowing normal sunlight much of the day , etc.; and most such maximum security prisons allowed time outside in a "bull pen" for hours each day- that "bull pen" being outside in the sunlight).
490:
243:
222:
253:
629:, near Granby, CT, the practice of intentional blinding was routinely used. This blinding can be done by passing a red hot iron before the eyes and even if the eyelids remainly tightly closed, the infrared radiation will go through and burn out the retina's permanently blinding the person. Such practices are surely cruel and unusual and beyond torture and are permanent, intentional maiming (that IS illegal, ladies).
437:
412:
344:
323:
191:
1179:
Concur. While these may be excellent examples of "cruel and unusual punishments," the list with links should do the job just fine. And why describe just two? Frankly, we don't need this kind of loving attention to horrific detail on this page: if you want to describe cruel and unusual punishments,
1163:
Why are there detailed descriptions of the punishments here? They already have their own pages. This article should outline definitions of "cruel and unusual punishments" but not the definition of the punishments there named. Also, surely some mention should be given to the colloquial use of the term
956:
I was about to make the same comment, but it seems I have been beaten to it by a couple of months. Still, nothing has been done about this. While the layout of the paragraph might seem to imply that "Death could take many days" refers specifically to the case where the victim is hoisted in the air, I
682:
Yes, this article is about cruel and unusual punishment, it's not about deciding who is responsible for cell block H, deciding whether cell block H is equal treatment, etc. And I did not attack you, I merely suggested you stay on topic as is suggested in wiki policy. "Knowledge (XXG) is not the place
1029:
The current text suggests that decapitation is a "deliberately painful" form of execution. History suggests very much the opposite, that it was viewed as an exceptionally preferable method of execution from the condemned's view and that of society. Indeed, often it was reserved for members of the
510:
The wiki at the bottom of the main body section is inappropriate. In a paragraph discussing a SCOTUS decision concerning mandatory minimum sentences in the United States, the wiki on "mandatory minimum sentences" redirects to "Whole Life Tariff"--a concept in 'British' law. I have redirected this
1075:
According to the 1888 Encyclopedia
Britannica article 'Mongols,' the Khanate practiced impalement in the mid 1200s, during which time they invaded Turkic lands. Whether or not the Turks could be said to have learned it from them (as the peoples of the Baltic region did), the Mongol empire extended
756:
I see that those paragraphs are indeed POV, but the information that's in it isn't POV, and should stay. Imagine a paragraph "The wall is red and many people are against this. This is an extremely inappropriate color for the wall, and definitely is one of the Most
Controversial Walls 1900, without
633:
during the nite (and while out, they may jog about a track, shoot basketball, lift weights, go to high school and some college classes, take ourses e.g. in painting (these painting classes have been largely credited with showing inmates from poor homes that they can be creative and be productive)
1071:
Since
Constantinople effectively became Istanbul in 1453, when Vlad was 22, he would have been the prisoner of either the Byzantines or (much more likely, his traditional enemy) the Ottoman Turks. Both of these powers controlled hundreds of thousands of square miles of Asia during centuries-long
632:
Today, prisoners in maximum security prisons are held under a broad range of incarceration from what would be considered a healthy attempt to rehabilitate (see
Minnesota pratice of allowing maximum security prisoners to be out of their cells (on good behavior) all day long and only be locked up
886:
Unusual, specifically, and a few other clauses in this amendment indicate "normality". If society or the common laws at the time, including general legal attitudes among authorities and the people "president", deems something acceptable, it can be used as fair sentence even if it is in fact
779:
Most court and prison officials would espouse to be surely
Christian in the USA; but should they reflect at all about what Christ would think of the above practices of no sunlight , no exercise ever, no real attempt at all of any rehabilitation, no care at all for those then driven crazy ?
1030:
higher classes and even "bestowed" as a form of clemency. The text also suggests that it is a "severe" form of the death penalty--severe, I suppose, in relation to what? Death by dessert or old age? Poisoning? Shooting? But Time magazine is the source, so this is no surprise.
511:
wiki to "Mandatory sentencing", as it is not germane to the paragraph: (the two concepts, albeit related are not the same) mandatory minimums in the United States are not necessarily life-sentences and concern different legal traditions in different countries.
642:
Can it be "equal treatment" (under the law/under the US Constitution) for a prisoner to be in the
Oklahoma "H" block underground with no sunlight ever, when another prisoner is in the Minnesota maximum security prison and outside all day in the sunlight etc ?
1067:
The impalement section refers to the practice occurring in Europe and Asia during the middle ages, and says that Vlad the
Impaler learned the practice from imprisonment in Constantinople/Istanbul. The reference to Asia had a 'where?' tag.
1076:
from
Manchuria to Poland to Arabia, which seems sufficient justification for the statement all by itself. Our article on impalement says that it was also traditional in Malay lands, and in at least some parts of India. Do we need a list?
757:
question." This paragraph is POV, and should be altered, but not removed completely, since the fact that "The wall is red and many people are against this" is valid. Likewise, these paragraphs need to be put back in a neutral, NPOV form.
957:
see no reason why this should have the effect of prolonging the victim's life in the slightest, let alone by days. On the other hand, I am no expert in this subject, so someone with a reliable source should probably take a look at this.
1072:
stretches of the middle ages, along with
Constantinople/Istanbul itself, which is in Europe. If either of these peoples practiced impalement during Vlad's lifetime, they did so in both Europe and Asia during the middle ages. QED.
581:
Yes, but imprisonment is not equal to punishment. I don't think that, for example, temporarily revoking someone's driver's license if that person was found to be driving far over the speed limit is necessarily an act of cruelty.
153:
855:
The section on impalement makes two contradictory statements. The third sentence says impalement leads to "rapid, painful, death." The sixth sentences says "Death could take many days." Which is the correct statement?
795:
549:'. Some courts believe that because 'punishments' is plural they have the power to review types of punishments, but not individual sentences. I'll try to find some cases to this effect when i have time.
812:
Where precedent is concerned (for example, Supreme Court interpretation of both cruel and unusual, and not just one or the other), citations and references to individual cases would be most helpful.
646:
And, are "H" block prisons in and of themselves clearly "cruel and unusual punishment" banned by 8th
Amendment as they frequently drive persons insane - a punishment not ever given by any sentence ?
1095:
I don't know why, but this article seems to strongly imply that all cruel and unusual punishments are death sentences. Is there any reason why there shouldn't be other less extreme examples added?
887:
humiliating, offensive or hurtful to the judged. Once a person is judged guilty, even if they did not commit said crime, they are subject to the full arm of the law and the people who uphold it.
443:
417:
783:
Ref. See Bible's predition that ALL prisoners WILL be released upon Christ's return in the Second Coming... (after being entirely healed to be normal and being told to go and sin no more).
520:
In case anyone was wondering where the bit at the end about mandatory sentences gone, the supreme court has ruled them, and therefore zero tolerance, to be unconstitutional. More info
147:
650:
These may be interesting questions, but have nothing to do with the article, which is what the talk page is for. I'd suggest finding a forum or blog somewhere to discuss this.
44:
1211:
Removed. If I have time after I graduate, I may come back and see if I can expand this section. If not, I'm sure there are competent editors aplenty who can do the work.
1308:
1304:
1290:
394:
1390:
384:
1400:
79:
622:
forenote- some person with moniker - kybldmsstr with no knowledge whatsoever of the law or of Constitutional Law erased these pertinent paragraphs below...
1395:
1385:
1111:
360:
786:
What then of those who acted to imprison these persons in such conditions that are forgiven entirely ? Compare to Dachau ? Compare to star chambers ?
562:
The term "cruel" is necessarily flexible according to the circumstances, since all punishments are inherently cruel to some greater or lesser degree.
85:
305:
1375:
946:
295:
351:
328:
1165:
1037:
1005:
984:
168:
30:
135:
1096:
758:
639:
Who voted to decide to remove all light and all freedom of any movement at all and all exercise at all in e.g. prisons as Oklahoma ?
1077:
99:
1380:
1370:
1286:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
938:
The part about impalement says in one sentence that the death is rapid, and in another that it could take many days. Which is it? --
894:
104:
20:
1266:
496:
74:
1228:
1197:
202:
129:
527:
That's not right. The type of mandatory minimum sentences under discussion were specifically held to be constitutional in
65:
1276:
743:
If you want to include this in the article, can you give info about your sources, for example for paragraphs 1,2,3 above.
125:
1351:
1250:
615:
24:
266:
227:
1112:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/12/us/soy-diet-is-cruel-and-unusual-florida-inmate-claims.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
570:
What's debatable? Locking someone in a little concrete room with bars on the windows is an act of cruelty, isn't it?
175:
109:
943:
1307:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
820:
Does anyone have a source for the claim that capital punishment has been part of the US law since the founding?
1132:
1009:
988:
1169:
1041:
208:
190:
1342:
1258:
1100:
1081:
825:
762:
270:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
1033:
1001:
980:
890:
448:
422:
861:
141:
55:
1326:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1314:
898:
876:
583:
359:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1257:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
605:
70:
604:
Link removed, no longer directs people to the correct website, simply sends them directly to Oyez.com
939:
1222:
1191:
1128:
920:
836:
744:
684:
651:
161:
1021:
occurred can use this excuse to defend themselves with the reasons that, they think, are rational
541:
These exact words later appeared in the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1787).
924:
871:
I've removed the infobox because the first statement in question has apparently been reversed. --
840:
821:
799:
626:
553:
1311:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1327:
857:
1267:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110102080552/http://www.paclii.org/mh/legis/consol_act/cotmi363/
962:
521:
512:
51:
913:
872:
1334:
736:
726:
718:
712:
702:
698:
489:
1356:
1235:
1204:
1173:
1153:
1149:
1136:
1122:
1118:
1104:
1085:
1045:
1013:
992:
966:
950:
928:
902:
880:
865:
844:
829:
802:
766:
747:
687:
654:
608:
586:
574:
556:
535:
532:
515:
1280:
1144:
It is at least two federal cases on the exact nature of the constitutional implications.
977:
To me, the statement has actually encouraged violences that are not supposed to happen.
732:
722:
708:
1277:
https://archive.is/20120802122705/http://www.internationaljusticeproject.org/seminal.cfm
528:
1293:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1216:
1185:
998:
The statement itself shows the example from one extreme (CRUEL) to another (KIND) and
571:
1333:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1300:
1270:
1364:
1164:"cruel and unusual" as the legacy of this legal term/impact on culture and society?
958:
598:
356:
242:
221:
252:
436:
411:
1299:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1145:
1114:
343:
322:
258:
248:
1127:
So incredibly trivial that youj shouldn't even be noting it here, Hcobb. --
1018:
731:
Paragraphs 4-6 are unencyclopedic opinion and simply don't fit. Call is
545:
Actually, the Eighth Amendment prohibits 'cruel and unusual punishment
1180:
do it on their individual pages. I'm going to remove these examples.
599:
A list of notable US cases relating to cruel and unusual punishment
669:
the above is discussing... where do they get you doodes who can't
666:
what is not "cruel and unusal punishment" - which is exactly what
458:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities
484:
271:
184:
15:
672:
think clearly enuf to read and discuss anything and only want
1261:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
663:
dear arthur blog, the article is exactly about what is and
914:
Protocol 6 to the The European Convention on Human Rights
461:
Template:WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities
1254:
694:
An analysis of the 6 paragraphs in question shows that
1281:
http://www.internationaljusticeproject.org/seminal.cfm
794:
what determines if a punishment is cruel and unusual?
160:
973:
Be cruel to be kind --- dictionary of Wiki Idoms ???
566:
I don't think we should be presenting this as fact.
355:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1303:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1271:
http://www.paclii.org/mh/legis/consol_act/cotmi363/
174:
446:, a project which is currently considered to be
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
444:WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities
1289:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
495:This article is currently the subject of an
464:Correction and Detention Facilities articles
916:, adopted in 1983, bans the death penalty.
188:
1052:Removed the tag in the Impalement section
888:
406:
317:
216:
1249:I have just modified 2 external links on
816:Really a part of US law since inception?
369:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Human rights
1401:Knowledge (XXG) articles as assignments
408:
319:
218:
1391:High-importance Human rights articles
796:possibly useful, or interesting, link
7:
1025:Decapitation "deliberately painful."
675:to attack any writer you don't know?
442:This article is within the scope of
349:This article is within the scope of
264:This article is within the scope of
1056:tag in the Impalement section": -->
455:Correction and Detention Facilities
418:Correction and Detention Facilities
274:and the subjects encompassed by it.
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
798:(focuses on the US 8th amendment).
14:
1396:WikiProject Human rights articles
1386:Start-Class Human rights articles
1253:. Please take a moment to review
707:Paragraph 2 is Original research
372:Template:WikiProject Human rights
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
488:
435:
410:
342:
321:
251:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
389:This article has been rated as
300:This article has been rated as
280:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law
1086:02:57, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
967:02:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
1154:16:17, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
1137:17:54, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
1123:16:15, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
1014:03:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
993:03:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
881:00:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
845:23:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
830:22:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
609:14:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
575:19:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
363:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1376:High-importance law articles
1251:Cruel and unusual punishment
1105:20:56, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
803:01:30, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
767:21:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
748:23:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
688:23:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
655:22:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
616:cruel and unusual punishment
536:04:40, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
516:22:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
25:Cruel and unusual punishment
1357:00:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
1236:22:13, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
1205:22:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
587:04:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
557:17:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
1417:
1320:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1246:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
395:project's importance scale
306:project's importance scale
1159:Discussion of punishments
1046:20:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
951:23:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
929:16:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
697:Paragraph 1 is Unsourced
625:In the US 1600s , e.g at
430:
388:
337:
299:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1381:WikiProject Law articles
1371:Start-Class law articles
1174:23:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
903:00:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
866:23:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
790:method of determination?
352:WikiProject Human rights
283:Template:WikiProject Law
1242:External links modified
835:I've added a few refs
564:
543:
497:educational assignment
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1110:Yeah, like Soybeans.
1017:any attachers of the
560:
539:
375:Human rights articles
201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
1301:regular verification
774:
105:No original research
1291:After February 2018
1091:Not just executions
529:Ewing v. California
1345:InternetArchiveBot
1296:InternetArchiveBot
627:Old Newgate Prison
506:Mandatory Minimums
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1321:
1036:comment added by
1004:comment added by
983:comment added by
905:
893:comment added by
503:
502:
480:
479:
476:
475:
472:
471:
405:
404:
401:
400:
316:
315:
312:
311:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1408:
1355:
1346:
1319:
1318:
1297:
1234:
1231:
1225:
1219:
1203:
1200:
1194:
1188:
1064:
1063:
1059:
1048:
1016:
995:
701:and non-neutral
492:
485:
466:
465:
462:
459:
456:
439:
432:
431:
426:
414:
407:
377:
376:
373:
370:
367:
346:
339:
338:
333:
325:
318:
288:
287:
284:
281:
278:
261:
256:
255:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1361:
1360:
1349:
1344:
1312:
1305:have permission
1295:
1259:this simple FaQ
1244:
1229:
1223:
1217:
1214:
1198:
1192:
1186:
1183:
1161:
1093:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1055:
1054:
1031:
1027:
999:
978:
975:
949:
940:UberScienceNerd
936:
911:
853:
818:
810:
792:
777:
717:Paragraph 3 is
620:
595:
538:
508:
463:
460:
457:
454:
453:
420:
391:High-importance
374:
371:
368:
365:
364:
332:High‑importance
331:
302:High-importance
285:
282:
279:
276:
275:
267:WikiProject Law
257:
250:
231:High‑importance
230:
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1414:
1412:
1404:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1378:
1373:
1363:
1362:
1339:
1338:
1331:
1284:
1283:
1275:Added archive
1273:
1265:Added archive
1243:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1181:
1166:86.181.120.186
1160:
1157:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1129:OuroborosCobra
1092:
1089:
1053:
1050:
1038:67.242.118.254
1026:
1023:
1006:165.228.190.54
985:165.228.190.54
974:
971:
970:
969:
942:
935:
932:
910:
907:
884:
883:
852:
849:
848:
847:
817:
814:
809:
806:
791:
788:
776:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
751:
750:
741:
740:
739:
729:
715:
705:
691:
690:
679:
678:
677:
676:
673:
670:
667:
664:
658:
657:
619:
612:
602:
601:
594:
591:
590:
589:
578:
577:
551:
526:
507:
504:
501:
500:
493:
482:
478:
477:
474:
473:
470:
469:
467:
440:
428:
427:
415:
403:
402:
399:
398:
387:
381:
380:
378:
361:the discussion
347:
335:
334:
326:
314:
313:
310:
309:
298:
292:
291:
289:
263:
262:
246:
234:
233:
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1413:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1374:
1372:
1369:
1368:
1366:
1359:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1347:
1336:
1332:
1329:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1316:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1292:
1287:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1247:
1241:
1237:
1232:
1230:Contributions
1226:
1220:
1213:
1210:
1209:
1206:
1201:
1199:Contributions
1195:
1189:
1182:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1158:
1156:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1097:173.183.79.81
1090:
1088:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1073:
1069:
1060:
1051:
1049:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1024:
1022:
1020:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
996:
994:
990:
986:
982:
972:
968:
964:
960:
955:
954:
953:
952:
948:
947:Contributions
945:
941:
934:Contradiction
933:
931:
930:
926:
922:
917:
915:
908:
906:
904:
900:
896:
892:
882:
878:
874:
870:
869:
868:
867:
863:
859:
851:Contradiction
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
833:
832:
831:
827:
823:
822:LinuxMercedes
815:
813:
807:
805:
804:
801:
800:Darker Dreams
797:
789:
787:
784:
781:
775:Christ's View
768:
764:
760:
759:173.183.79.81
755:
754:
753:
752:
749:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
728:
724:
720:
716:
714:
710:
706:
704:
700:
696:
695:
693:
692:
689:
686:
681:
680:
674:
671:
668:
665:
662:
661:
660:
659:
656:
653:
649:
648:
647:
644:
640:
637:
634:
630:
628:
623:
617:
613:
611:
610:
607:
600:
597:
596:
592:
588:
585:
584:68.230.24.148
580:
579:
576:
573:
569:
568:
567:
563:
559:
558:
555:
550:
548:
542:
537:
534:
530:
525:
523:
518:
517:
514:
505:
498:
494:
491:
487:
486:
483:
468:
451:
450:
445:
441:
438:
434:
433:
429:
424:
419:
416:
413:
409:
396:
392:
386:
383:
382:
379:
362:
358:
354:
353:
348:
345:
341:
340:
336:
330:
327:
324:
320:
307:
303:
297:
294:
293:
290:
273:
269:
268:
260:
254:
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1343:
1340:
1315:source check
1294:
1288:
1285:
1248:
1245:
1162:
1143:
1094:
1078:69.106.56.96
1074:
1070:
1066:
1028:
997:
976:
937:
918:
912:
909:European Law
889:— Preceding
885:
854:
819:
811:
793:
785:
782:
778:
645:
641:
638:
635:
631:
624:
621:
606:67.52.194.50
603:
593:Expired link
565:
561:
552:
546:
544:
540:
519:
513:ColinKennedy
509:
481:
447:
390:
366:Human rights
357:Human rights
350:
329:Human rights
301:
286:law articles
265:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1032:—Preceding
1000:—Preceding
979:—Preceding
895:99.6.93.250
873:Jesdisciple
858:BecauseWhy?
272:legal field
199:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
1365:Categories
1352:Report bug
808:references
533:Ekimbrough
259:Law portal
1335:this tool
1328:this tool
1218:Septegram
1187:Septegram
1019:violences
572:Ellsworth
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1341:Cheers.—
1034:unsigned
1002:unsigned
981:unsigned
921:JamesWim
891:unsigned
837:Arthurrh
745:Arthurrh
685:Arthurrh
652:Arthurrh
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1255:my edit
959:Robin S
449:defunct
423:defunct
393:on the
304:on the
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
737:WP:POV
727:WP:POV
719:WP:VER
713:WP:VER
703:WP:POV
699:WP:VER
554:Spambi
205:scale.
126:Google
1146:Hcobb
1115:Hcobb
733:WP:OR
723:WP:OR
709:WP:OR
618:today
614:Real
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1224:Talk
1193:Talk
1170:talk
1150:talk
1133:talk
1119:talk
1101:talk
1082:talk
1058:edit
1042:talk
1010:talk
989:talk
963:talk
944:Talk
925:talk
899:talk
877:talk
862:talk
841:talk
826:talk
763:talk
735:and
725:and
711:and
522:here
385:High
296:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1309:RfC
1279:to
1269:to
277:Law
228:Law
176:TWL
1367::
1322:.
1317:}}
1313:{{
1172:)
1152:)
1135:)
1121:)
1103:)
1084:)
1044:)
1012:)
991:)
965:)
927:)
919:--
901:)
879:)
864:)
843:)
828:)
765:)
721:,
524:.
156:)
54:;
1354:)
1350:(
1337:.
1330:.
1233:*
1227:*
1221:*
1215:*
1202:*
1196:*
1190:*
1184:*
1168:(
1148:(
1131:(
1117:(
1099:(
1080:(
1062:]
1040:(
1008:(
987:(
961:(
923:(
897:(
875:(
860:(
839:(
824:(
761:(
547:s
499:.
452:.
425:)
421:(
397:.
308:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
