3214:; the religious order of Jain laymen, laywomen, monks and nuns. There was a disagreement between early Hinduism, which did not allow scriptural access to women, and ascetic movements such as Jainism which were based on equality. However, the early svetambara scriptures prevented pregnant women, young women or those who have a small child, to enter to the ranks of nun. Regardless, the number of nuns given in those texts were always the double of the number of monks. Parsva and Mahavira, two historical teachers of Jainism has huge numbers of female devotees and ascetics. According to the svetambara's scriptures such as Chhedasutra, women were given lesser authority than their male counterparts. The reasons for this, in the commentaries, were that things which could endanger the vow of chasity should be avoided. Nalini Balbir writes that the belief that women are more fragile then men were all-pervading in these texts.
3005:
recounting certain beliefs in
Jainism, without any explanation of what the criticism is. Maybe there are sources that find fault with the absence of a theory of how the world came to be, but we should indicate who takes that position, in the text. On the other hand, it seems to me to be very clear that the "Fasting" and "Women" sections belong here. For "Fasting", there needs to be some clearer explanation of why the court petition was made, why there were objections to what is arguably a form of suicide. But that shouldn't be difficult: it's pretty obvious why some people would criticize that. I would be interested also in seeing what the scholars who study it (see
1524:"Thus the practice of worshipping idols originated with the Jains (in this country)"."When after Raja Bhoja, the Jainis installed idols in their temples and began to frequent them for paying homage and adoration to the images, the disciples of these popes (Vaama Maargis and Shivites) began to follow their example"."The Jain idols were always naked and represented a being who was seated in a contemplative mood and had renounced the world, while on the contrary the Vaishnava idols symbolized gods having by their sides goddesses, who were dressed out in fine style and excited lascivious thoughts by their lewd charms and licentious looks."
1480:. There is indeed truth in statement "Dayanand Saraswati towards other religions as expressed in Satyarth Prakash was strongly condemnatory, predominantly negative and positively intolerant and negative". His criticism of other religions/sects is even stronger. However his views of Jainism are interesting. Perhaps I will add them sometime. It has been suggested that he was inspired by the Sthanakawasi Jain tradition to formulate his opposition to idol worship in his native Gujarat.
2321:"observant Jains generally will not kill anything, including insects"(p. 148). Later in the book, he commends Buddhist views of consciousness and happiness, which he insists are "empirical" doctrines that are "susceptible of rational discussion" (p. 221). Harris reserves his (justified) venom for those religions that make radical claims in the absence of any credible evidence, and which indeed disdain subjecting their core doctrines to the test of evidence.
655:
634:
271:
250:
602:
510:
520:
483:
1091:
Svetamabara, a school that holds firmly to the opinion that sex is not relevant and believes one of the
Tirthankaras was, in fact, female. The opinions cited in other sections are also unclear: they apparently cite random passers-by from states in the American Midwest, with no information about notability and little reference to existing criticisms of Jainism by scholars and by Jains themselves.
457:
379:
351:
365:
219:
389:
21:
1271:
other religions." It then provides examples of dayananda's views towards
Jainism, Christianity and Islam, and ends with "The militant Aryas followed the path of Dayananda and rejected any suggestion to soften Dayananda's criticism of other faiths or to change, in any way, the word of their rsi." This seems more of a criticism of Dayanada rather than Jainism.
3292:"There was a disagreement between early Hinduism, which did not allow scriptural access to women, and ascetic movements such as Jainism which were based on equality" is not related to the page. Because the page is related to jainism, not hinduism. Nor it has any competence with hinduism in this regard.
3093:
There may be an emerging consensus to remove the "non-creationism" section, although its removal is far from urgent, pending further talk. However, Rahul, I don't think that there was any consensus for you to remove the two lines from the "women" section. If there are weasel words, let's identify and
2435:
I have removed the section on status of women. The section does not belong to this article, since it is not a criticism. The content in it talks about the doctrine of
Jainism in which Digambara denies moksha to women, where as svetambara does not. It does not state who criticises this doctrine or how
2957:
I think delete the Non-creationism and Women sections. They can be created again if there does turn out to be notable criticism about these aspects. By the way, "criticism" of a religion can come from within that religion, e.g. Protestantism critiques
Catholicism and vice-versa, within Christianity.
2938:
The section "Women" talk about an internal dispute between the two schools of
Jainism, one holds that women can attain liberation in that very life, the other holds that women needs to be reborn as men to attain liberation. The section also mentions various line of reasoning put forward by Digambara
2320:
Harris does not, in fact, claim that all religions have a negative net effect on the world. At one point he comments semi-facetiously that "the uncontrollable spread of
Jainism throughout the world would improve our situation immensely", even though "we would lose more of our crops to pests" because
1221:
There is no text in
Jainism which says women are "impure". Citation or reference of the original text is needed. someone has written, "Women are believed to be harmful by nature", the question is where & in which text?. As per the policy of Knowledge (XXG), ones own idea or interpretation is not
3596:
say that women's genitals and breasts are sources of impurity and have many micro-organisims living in them. Digambara Jain theologians have written that due to bodily secretions, women suffer from itching which gives them uncontrollable sexual urges. They believe that women cannot take higher vows
2628:
Where's the source of "}}" you are reading, and The source of "Hindutva: Exploring the Idea of Hindu
Nationalism", by Jyotirmaya Sharma, p. 33" does adds the whole thing that has been added on the page, as well as the other source, now since multiple sources are claiming the same thing, and Jainism
1437:
It's funny that you are telling me to "stop edit warring", yet you have made at least 7 disruptive reverts in less than a week. How it can be proved that
Dayanand didn't criticized hinduism? He criticized not only hinduism, but his views are also situated in the page of swaminarayan, and others. So
1394:
This topic is not even about "christianity" or "islam", this is not the page of Dayanand Saraswati, but page of Jainism, you don't have to cherry pick from the book, especially when it's off topic. You have already made enough attempts to remove the dayanand's quote, just because you don't like it.
1225:
someone has written " Their menstrual blood is considered to be impure in several important Jain texts (But which text? It is not mentioned?). The bleeding that occurs in menstruation is thought to kill micro-organisms in the body, making the female body less nonviolent than the male body. " . This
1206:
The statement that "certain categories of souls who have always been nigodas" is not factual. There are many references in Jain Agams which support the fact that Jiva (soul) in nigodas can attain Moksha. It is a possibility that here, nigodas means nitya-nigoda (which is different from nigoda), and
1128:
BTW I was raised as Digambara Jain, so do have some knowledge of Jainism, but I completely agree that this article need better citions, I would be searching for such, and would appreciate if you could provide some. Please let me know if you have any more points, so that we can improve this article.
2455:
I don't disagree nor agree with the editor, he should back up here. But then again, if texts are deleted this way, there would be certainly no need of this page, like discussed before too. The only part for which Jainism is critical is for it's creation theory and the quote by Dayanand Saraswati..
3004:
I had reverted Rahul's removal of those sections, with a request to come to talk, so thank you for starting this talk discussion. I'm open to either revising or deleting the "Non-creationism" section on the grounds that it's unclear what, really, is being criticized. That section reads like it's
1270:
The reference provided says that "The views of Dayanand Saraswati towards other religions as expressed in Satyarth Prakash was strongly condemnatory, predominantly negative and positively intolerant and negative. Jorden observes, "there is quite a lot of sarcastic bitterness" in the criticism of
2411:
hile Jainism is, as we have seen, atheist in a limited sense of rejection of both the existence of a creator God and the possibility of intervention of such a being in human affairs, it nonetheless must be regarded as a theist religion in the more profound sense that it accepts the existence of
1710:
If this source is not suiting you(the current one) we can add the above one instead, we might add "Philosopher Dayanand Saraswati wrote in his book Satyarth Prakash regards Jainism as "the most dreadful religion", he writes that Jains are "possessed of defective and childish understanding."(ref
3260:
source. It incorrectly quotes Gautama Buddha in the end and ascribe it to Mahavira. The bbc religions also does not seem to be a very good source. Women in Jainism have been extensively studied by many scholars, they should be used, in my opinion, and are relatively better than BBC religions.
3342:
and therefore lines like "There was a disagreement between early Hinduism, which did not allow scriptural access to women, and ascetic movements such as Jainism which were based on equality" are not related to the page and I think he is correct. Therefore, I have removed one line as of now.
1090:
The tone of this article is slanted. While there are valid criticisms of Jainism, this page contains a lot of seemingly deliberately incorrect anti-Jain information. For example, the section on women states that they cannot achieve moksha in Jainism, whereas in fact the majority of Jains are
3636:
Statements of religious doctrine are NOT criticism and should be removed or corrected. I stated this position almost a year ago and my changes were reverted for discussion. The majority of the discussion has agreed with my position, as recorded above, and yet the problematic sections, most
1539:
In Ch. 12, he claims that Jainism and Buddhist are the same in p. 525-526 (obviously wrong, but Swami Dayananda had access to only a few Jain and Buddhist texts). He criticizes Jainism (p. 528-) for Denial of the existence of Creator God and Denial of the Vedas as the eternal revelation.
3378:
To be a criticism there has to be an actual denigration, censure, or disparagement. At present this section (while undoubtedly relevant to the article) does nothing to show how it is relevant. And if actual direct criticism can be referenced, it needs to be removed. —
1331:
What's the point to mention about Christianity or Islam here? This is page related to Jainism, not Christianity or Islam. People say same about Richard dawkins too that he makes negative opinion about religions, but does it means it should be added? Obviously not.
1316:
I have added balancing material so that the statements do not misrepresent the source. I would, however, be in favor of removing the whole content about Dayandanda views.. Would request them to comment here too, instead of reverting edits without discussion.
2185:
1764:
Satyarth Prakash presents the views of Dayanand Saraswati, and thus of Arya Samaj, an important religious movement. While it is definitely not a reliable source of history (for example see the list of kings of Delhi), it is a valid source of Arya Samaj
1226:
is mere interpretation by some news reporter who doesn't have deep understanding of the religion. Menstural Blood kills microorganism is hilarious interpretation of a news reporter. Let this be a sensational news not a "quote from religious text".
3160:
Killing the section as it has been almost a year and the section still contains nothing at all that could be considered a criticism just a series of statements on Jain belief that if they belong anywhere belong in the main article on Jainism —
3078:
How many times we had the same conversation? Non-creationism is important for this page, because the actual theory of Jainism contradicts the based scientific theory about creation. Consensus are not made in 2 hours, but takes 2 days at least.
2989:
The "fasting to death" is clearly notable. Just a simple google search yielded me multiple sources. I have added one to the article. Rahul, please don't repetitively try to remove same content and avoid wasting of wiki communities time/effort.
2025:'s page as well? Or any articles where we can find the criticism from Dayanand Saraswati.. This page is neither about Hinduism, nor it's about the explanation of Dayanand or brahmo samaj. Only one comment from Dayanand Saraswati is enough.
3141:
Nowhere in the section, as it is written now, does it say that he criticized it. If we retain the section, then it needs to be revised to indicate what the criticism is, and who made it. (You mean "accept", not "except", don't you?)
3234:"Some texts state that women are spiritually unequal and impure." Which texts? Instead of this, a svetambara and a digambara text is mentioned now in the article. They are more specific on what inequality and impurity is mentioned.
3009:) say about it. As for "Women", where it says: "Some texts state that women are spiritually unequal and impure. Women are believed to be harmful by nature", can there really be any doubt that there are also people who criticize
1634:, this is getting off topic, but I would still mention, those times were different, whoever denied the authority of Vedas is either writing his/her own vedas or being a atheist, if you think about the times during the 500 BCE +
2456:
Other than that there's no really agreed criticism.. The page, criticism of hinduism lacks criticism too, only caste system which is neither hindu authority or unique. Although Buddhism and Sikhism got a lot of criticism.
2076:
The need to come with some rational arguments is probably at your side, Bladesmulti. Rahul's argument is perfectly valid: such quotes without context are meaningless, or worse, insulting and inflaming, and definitely not
181:
3202:"liberation" in Jainism. Some texts state that women are spiritually unequal and impure. Women are believed to be harmful by nature. Their menstrual blood is considered to be impure in several important Jain texts.
2564:"liberation" in Jainism. Some texts state that women are spiritually unequal and impure. Women are believed to be harmful by nature. Their menstrual blood is considered to be impure in several important Jain texts.
2737:, it was petitioned that High Court of Rajasthan should declare santhara illegal. Despite the petitions were rejected citing it the practice as important belief of Jains, and that it was protected under article 25.
1158:
Hi Ogress, I have provided clarification for the point you have raised regarding "incorrect anti-Jain information", so I think the POV tag can be removed. If you have any additional concerns, please provide them.
1350:
and it clearly says that dayanand views were intolerant and negative towards other religions. Jainism, Christianity and Islam were examples of how intolerant Dayananda's views were to other religions in general.
1365:
It seems like you dislike what he has said, your funny edits speaks enough about it. How it's intolerant? Are you saying that criticism based on a judgement is invalid? By profession, Dayanand was Philosopher.
803:
3533:
also postulates that actions of mind (or intentions) are more important than actual action. According the Jaina view, if a person kills a living being with no bad intentions, he/she will not acquire any sin.
1181:
Hi Ogress, thanks for taking time to edit and update this article, I have done some more improvements, also changed bare urls to full citations. I guess now we can take out the Cleanup-link rot and POV tags.
3063:
I have removed the section of "non-creationism" as per the rough consensus here. Also, I have removed the two lines which were recently added by Abhishikt. It contains too much POV-pushing and weasel words.
2980:. I have brought back a para deleted from this section. In fact, I would like to see expansion of this section as described in BBC sources. The sentence about Svetambara sect is just added info for clarity.
2647:"Hindutva: Exploring the Idea of Hindu Nationalism", by Jyotirmaya Sharma, p. 33" does not say that it is "notable". It does not even say that it is a fact. It is talking about the beliefs of Dayananda. --
2003:
Also, the line "These strategies are not supported by Jains and Buddhists" does not seem fully correct, because many Jains have joined the Hindu nationalist movements without giving a second thought. --
1680:
3522:
text, Buddha contends with a Jain monk who asserts that bodily actions are the most criminal, in comparison to the actions of speech and mind. Buddha criticises this view, saying that the actions of
2403:"If atheism is defined as disbelief in existence of a God, then Jainism cannot be labeled as atheistic, as it not only believes in existence of gods but also of the soul which can attain godhood. As
2099:
despite opposition from at least three editors. Doesn't it dawn on you that you can't just throw in a quote without providing a sufficient context? What's the use of such inflaming quotes?
2942:
The section "Fasting to death" mentions a practice of Jainism which was challenged by a random lawyer in the High court of India. This content, also, does not seem fit for this article. --
610:
493:
31:
3614:
These claims are very controversial and there is only one source cited. Also, I couldn't find the text referred by the author and therefore these claims need additional citations. -
2205:
No, I don't. I think that such a quote needs a context, to understand why he's saying what he's saying. Otherwise, it's a cheap and rhetoric way to criticise Jainism in general.
3633:
By definition a criticism article should only contain sourced criticism. An article should not contain merely statements of belief with the reader being led to infer criticism.
294:
3369:
Do we have any sources that actually criticize Jain belief about women or even that verify that the two schools, by differing in their beliefs, actively criticize each other.
175:
1757:
One has to agree with Rahul Jain. The quote from Pi. Es Ḍāniyēl is being misused here. The author's intention is to point out the harsh language used by the Swami. He states
3278:
Thanks for elaborating on that. I want to hear from other editors about the merits of it, because I don't know enough about it. It was me who added the subsection header. --
3013:? Criticism from within the religion is, indeed, relevant to this page, and I find it very hard to believe that stuff like that hasn't also been criticized from outside. --
2191:? Regarding the given references, it's like saying "Dayanand is wrong to criticize religions, because it doesn't deserved to be", something like that, don't you think so?
2474:
Rahul, you are missing the point. The point of criticism is Jainism gives less privileges/ respect/ value to women compared to men. Women are considered impure. Read the
3722:
3170:
While a few authors, like Dayanand Saraswati were critically analyzing Jainism, they are also pointing its non-creationism. It is notable and it should still be there.
2976:
The section "Women" is valid criticism. A religion de-valuing women is clearly noteworthy. This is well supported by reliable sources. This has already been discussed
1027:
needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
2935:
The section "non-creationism" talks about a doctrine of Jainism, according to which there is no creator deity. It does not talks about criticism of this doctrine.
3425:
2870:
1120:
the Digambara sect of the religion believes women must be reborn as men before they can true deliverance. Another sect, the Svetambara, disagrees with this theory
1759:"it was not the rationality, but the malice and spite against them. He simply argues and his criticism, as Khan Durrani notes, degenerated into "wholesale abuse"
972:
107:
815:
72:
592:
546:
947:
746:
705:
333:
752:
3737:
582:
1380:
The source that you presented say that he was intolerant and it does not say that he was a philosopher. It is not relevant what I like or dislike. --
1115:
You are right that 'woman not able to achieve moksha' is only in Digambar sect and svetambara disagrees with it. And the article clearly state that -
965:
879:
447:
3752:
3707:
695:
323:
2661:
It does explains it as a notable fact. Same with the other source that i had given which adds 4-5 more names for crediting the decline of jainism.
113:
554:
298:
3640:
Simply put, no matter how important that subject may be in understanding Jain beliefs, the paragraph as written offers NO criticism whatsoever.
3742:
3717:
437:
907:
893:
741:
615:
3566:
3502:
3483:
3459:
2893:
2313:
1838:"Hindu nationalism" is appropriate? When we add the criticism by Richard dawkins or chritopher hitchens, do we add like "Atheist ideology"?
736:
671:
1233:
1142:
58:
3681:
Apparently for some reason Knowledge (XXG) was showing me cached versions of the page. You are quite correct there is no such section. —
3727:
3311:
808:
550:
3732:
2362:"Sam Harris in his book The End of Faith, he regarded that Jainism theories are not harmful, but one would be surrounded by violence"
2054:
127:
3747:
3702:
780:
558:
534:
488:
196:
132:
48:
2613:
The source does not claim that this was notable, nor does it claims that it actually happened. I have thus removed these claims --
163:
911:
886:
860:
763:
724:
662:
639:
287:
278:
255:
102:
3712:
230:
915:
785:
412:
402:
356:
93:
3607:
1651:, that's why we have only represented the one liner of his criticism, otherwise it had to be larger than it is right now.
1556:
3588:
3338:
I think what Bladesmulti is trying to say is that this is page about Criticism of Jainism and not a comparision between
1509:), now on the web. In Ch. 11 he claims that the Jains introduced image worship (p. 371) and the Hindus copied the Jains.
1266:
regards Jainism as "the most dreadful religion", he writes that Jains were intolerant and hostile towards the non-Jains.
922:
757:
27:
2725:
is a procedure in which a Jain stops eating with the intention of death. The death reports of Jains were prevalent In
157:
3668:
3619:
3539:
2154:
1603:
Reliable enough for expressing his opinion, I know it's primary, but we have already provided the additional source.
768:
1888:
Now I am not getting the reason behind removing the quote by Sam harris. I added better source for Dayanand though.
282:, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with
774:
137:
2437:
2377:
2265:
2214:
2108:
1950:
1915:
1862:
1834:
1665:
As I said earlier, that's not a reason good enough to mis-represent what's written in Reliable Secondary Source.
153:
3397:
3266:
3069:
2947:
2842:
2813:
2785:
2746:
2680:
2652:
2618:
2573:
2537:
2445:
2332:
2298:
This is the paragraph which talks about Harris' views on Jainism. It doesn't seem like a criticism of Jainism.
2175:
2144:
2044:
2008:
1994:
1701:
1670:
1622:
1594:
1414:
1385:
1356:
1322:
1276:
1237:
1146:
236:
2412:
divine principle, the paramātmā i.e. God, existing in potential state within all beings.(Dundas (2002) p.111)
3315:
3227:
according to Jain doctrines. The claim that women cannot attain moksa in that very birth is specific to the
2039:
One comment from Dayanand saraswati without the analysis is definitely not enough to be present anywhere. --
203:
1544:
1229:
1010:
3262:
3065:
2943:
2809:
2781:
2742:
2676:
2648:
2614:
2569:
2533:
2441:
2328:
2171:
2140:
2040:
2004:
1990:
1697:
1666:
1648:
1618:
1590:
1410:
1381:
1352:
1318:
1272:
873:
83:
3307:
3297:
3175:
3131:
3084:
2963:
2799:
2763:
2694:
2666:
2634:
2461:
2421:
2347:
2283:
2231:
2196:
2161:
2130:
2062:
2030:
1932:
1893:
1879:
1843:
1781:
1716:
1687:
1656:
1639:
1608:
1502:
1443:
1428:
1400:
1371:
1337:
1291:
670:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
3439:
3252:"Their menstrual blood is considered to be impure in several important Jain texts." Again, which texts?
2475:
2400:
for example, can be looked into previous version of the page as well.. I found a good one from there..
791:
98:
3339:
3283:
3147:
3099:
3018:
2369:
2257:
2206:
2100:
2018:
1986:
1982:
1942:
1907:
1854:
52:
2278:
This point is yet to be discussed. Right now, I am also looking forward to the quote by Sam Harris.
2226:
Exactly same can be said for anyone else in general(like dawkins, hitchens, etc), but why we don't?
218:
20:
2995:
2483:
1187:
1164:
1134:
932:
by checking whether ] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.
189:
1985:
page. It seems to go a bit off-topic. The same content should be more appropriate for the article
169:
3348:
3219:"Although Jainism is dedicated to equality in many ways, women do face difficulties in attaining
3123:
3042:
2507:
2366:"the uncontrollable spread of Jainism throughout the world would improve our situation immensely"
1257:
1208:
1046:
3198:
Although Jainism is dedicated to equality in many ways, women do face difficulties in attaining
2560:
Although Jainism is dedicated to equality in many ways, women do face difficulties in attaining
2253:
1902:
Oh please Bladesmulti, stop pushing POV, and contextualize Dayanand. Fowler&fowler gave an
3664:
3615:
3535:
2398:
2310:
1874:
Added Sam harris, so now it's "criticism by source".. As we got multiple critics on the page.
1770:
1631:
1552:
1485:
1305:
79:
2757:
943:
864:
3293:
3171:
3127:
3080:
2959:
2924:
Are the sections "Non-creationism", "Fasting to death" and "Women" relevant to this article?
2795:
2759:
2690:
2662:
2630:
2590:
2457:
2417:
2343:
2279:
2227:
2192:
2157:
2126:
2058:
2026:
1928:
1889:
1875:
1839:
1777:
1712:
1683:
1652:
1635:
1604:
1578:
1477:
1439:
1424:
1396:
1367:
1333:
1287:
1262:
1100:
1058:
929:
2529:
921:
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see
876:
to your page ({{User WikiProject Atheism}} or {{User WPA2}}) and attract potential members.
3530:
3279:
3220:
3199:
3143:
3119:
3095:
3014:
2561:
525:
2397:
Atheism is either correct allegation or false allegation, it is one of the minus points,
1586:
958:
3372:
At present we have evidence that there are different attitudes. that is not criticism.
2629:
having one of the lowest population for the "world religion" today.. Where's the doubt?
2416:
So if minus point is added with the quote above, it might be coherent with the subject.
1506:
1501:
You can read about Dayananda's view as expressed in Satyarth Prakash in original Hindi (
1280:
2991:
2479:
1183:
1160:
1130:
2436:
or why is it been criticised. The same content might be more suitable for the article
1286:
He has made such remark about Jainism, which is confirmed, and it's critical in form.
654:
633:
3696:
3344:
3038:
2503:
1311:
1034:
1024:
953:
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating
3223:"liberation" in Jainism." This is highly POV. Even men face difficulty in attaining
3682:
3658:
3647:
3380:
3162:
2586:
2568:
None of the given sources directly support any of the claim made in those lines. --
2022:
1766:
1548:
1481:
1030:
394:
270:
249:
601:
2304:
2139:
Have you any source? Hemant Mehta, whom you presented earlier, isn't reliable. --
2906:"Hindutva: Exploring the Idea of Hindu Nationalism", by Jyotirmaya Sharma, p. 33
2404:
1346:
The source should not be misrepresented. Nowhere does it say that Dayanand is a
1093:
987:
3685:
3672:
3650:
3623:
3543:
3383:
3352:
3319:
3306:
Bladesmulti, I'm not sure what you are saying here. We should discuss this on
3301:
3287:
3270:
3179:
3165:
3151:
3135:
3103:
3088:
3073:
3046:
3022:
2999:
2977:
2967:
2951:
2817:
2803:
2789:
2767:
2750:
2698:
2684:
2670:
2656:
2638:
2622:
2577:
2541:
2511:
2487:
2465:
2449:
2425:
2384:
2351:
2336:
2287:
2272:
2235:
2221:
2200:
2179:
2165:
2148:
2134:
2115:
2066:
2048:
2034:
2012:
1998:
1957:
1936:
1922:
1897:
1883:
1869:
1847:
1785:
1720:
1705:
1691:
1674:
1660:
1643:
1626:
1612:
1598:
1447:
1432:
1418:
1404:
1389:
1375:
1360:
1341:
1326:
1295:
1241:
1211:
1191:
1168:
1150:
1106:
519:
3006:
2730:
2689:"Paths to the Divine: Ancient and Indian", by Vensus A. George, p. 322 - 323.
2122:
1423:
Misrepresent? No way, he's not some random philosopher who needs description.
515:
384:
2734:
954:
509:
482:
3597:
of ascetic renunciation, because naked women would have two deep emotions:
2327:
Its fine by me if the source is summarized properly with proper context. --
1711:"Hindu Response to Religious Pluralism", page 52, author = Pi. Es Ḍāniyēl)
456:
378:
350:
3663:
There is no such section named "non-creationism" in the article. Regards,-
2601:
It is notable that Adi Shankara defeated Jain in religious discussion and
723:
If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the
545:-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us
2718:
2602:
2342:
Yeah, he seems less critical. Maybe, he wouldn't be needed for the page.
541:
3037:
Of course, these are all valid points/sections relevant to the article.
2606:
2593:, specifically the insistence on non-intervention by any Supreme Being.
1617:
The secondary ("additional") source is not being represented properly.
1052:
667:
283:
1503:
http://www.aryasamajjamnagar.org/satyarthprakash/satyarth_prakash.htm
364:
717:
For more information and how you can help, click the link opposite:
410:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
3440:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/jainism/beliefs/women.shtml
2726:
2153:
Why hemant mehta is not reliable? There are many sources, one here
407:
3231:
sect which is numerically smaller. It is unnecessary generalized.
2741:
The above claim is also not supported by the mentioned source. --
2589:
has criticised the Jain position on the supremacy and potency of
1061:
defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century.
3585:
3518:
I have removed this para: "In the Upālisutta dialogue of this
3007:
Sallekhana#Santhara/Sallekhana scholarship in Western academia
2939:
sect of Jainism. This, also, cannot be called as "criticism".
1409:
That's not a reason good enough to misrepresent the source. --
212:
43:
15:
3629:
RfC: Are several suggestions of this article even criticism?
2958:
The Fasting to death issue looks more likely to be notable.
2502:
Obviously this is part of criticism. So reverting it back.
600:
455:
3526:
are most criminal, and not the actions of speech or body."
1927:
And what about Sam harris? One of the most popular critic.
906:
Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see
3210:
The religion of Jains included women in their fourfold
2097:
2095:
2093:
2091:
2088:
2086:
2084:
2082:
1979:
1903:
1314:
1308:
848:
843:
838:
833:
2582:
The article currently uses lots of incorrect sources:
2090:
and removed attempts at contextualizing also 4 times
2021:, Are we going to add this same long explanation into
406:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of
188:
3310:, so I can get a clearer picture, of what you mean.
2915:"Indian Affairs Annual 2006", p. 18, by Mahendra Gaur
2883:
2881:
2597:
There is no such claim made in the page 1 of Pandey.
1507:
http://www.aryasamajjamnagar.org/chaptertwelve.htm#12
1252:
I have removed the following lines from the article:
539:, a project to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s articles on
286:. If you would like to participate, please visit the
3473:
3471:
3469:
3449:
3447:
1981:
However, I do not think it should be present in the
666:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
3365:
What is a actually a criticism in the women section
3122:, the non-creationism of Jainism was criticized by
613:, a work group which is currently considered to be
202:
3237:"Women are believed to be harmful by nature." The
2187:. BTW, do you really believe that there's need of
1978:The content recently added solves the POV problem.
1207:therefore nitya-nigoda should be used, not nigoda.
957:, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see
942:Find sources for all positions of an article (see
3249:(which BBC source roughly translates as harmful).
2306:Beyond the hoax: science, philosophy and culture
1835:User talk:Joshua Jonathan#Criticism of jainism..
61:for general discussion of the article's subject.
3208:
3196:
2716:
2599:
2584:
2558:
2532:, because I am not sure for its reliability. --
1941:That's fair; I'll take a look at that one too.
1254:
928:Ensure atheism-related articles are members of
3637:especially the one on non-creationism remain.
2081:. You've inserted Dayanand times now 4 times
3565:harvnb error: no target: CITEREFKrishan1997 (
3241:of women is not considered as harmful. Their
2556:I have removed these lines from the article:
2170:That blog is also written by Hemant Mehta. --
8:
3398:"Women Impure During their Menstrual Cycle?"
2843:"Women Impure During their Menstrual Cycle?"
1438:kindly you should better stop edit warring.
2440:, but it is unsuitable for this article. --
816:Articles recently added to Category:Atheism
1906:. I'll contextualize your Dayanand-quote.
713:
628:
477:
345:
244:
3605:of sexual assault which they might face.
2892:sfn error: no target: CITEREFPandey1978 (
1125:so I assume your this point is clarified.
30:on 14 December 2013 (UTC). The result of
3723:C-Class India articles of Low-importance
3560:
3553:
3424:was invoked but never defined (see the
3389:
2869:was invoked but never defined (see the
2834:
2733:is outlawed and suicide is a crime. In
2360:So, where does your comment come from,
1806:
1776:He hasnt' talked about Es Daniyel yet.
630:
479:
347:
246:
216:
3583:I have removed the following content:
2887:
2808:I have corrected it in the article. --
1974:Hindu revivalism and Indian identities
3501:sfn error: no target: CITEREFBalbir (
3482:sfn error: no target: CITEREFBalbir (
3458:sfn error: no target: CITEREFBalbir (
3245:is, according to the digambara sect,
7:
2055:Knowledge (XXG):I just don't like it
2053:Dude.. Make some rational argument,
747:Links to atheism-related information
660:This article is within the scope of
609:This article is within the scope of
567:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Religion
531:This article is within the scope of
400:This article is within the scope of
3416:
2861:
2552:Incorrect representation of sources
2478:. May be we should word it better.
1816:Gandhi on Pluralism and Communalism
1112:Hi Ogress. Thanks for the feedback.
680:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Atheism
306:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Jainism
235:It is of interest to the following
51:for discussing improvements to the
3496:
3477:
3453:
3375:Disagreements are not criticism.
3256:I am also highly skeptical of the
2928:I do not think these sections are
464:This article was last assessed in
290:for more details on the projects.
14:
422:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India
78:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
3738:Low-importance Religion articles
3190:Revisions in the "Women" section
2528:Ok, I have taken that source to
1853:Sure. Dawkins is an ideologist.
1696:Can you provide the full quote?
966:list of atheism-related articles
653:
632:
518:
508:
481:
387:
377:
363:
349:
269:
248:
217:
73:Click here to start a new topic.
19:
3753:Low-importance Atheism articles
3708:Low-importance Jainism articles
3194:I deleted the following lines:
700:This article has been rated as
587:This article has been rated as
442:This article has been rated as
328:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
3400:. Anekant Education Foundation
2932:and hence should be removed.
2845:. Anekant Education Foundation
2772:That is Indian Affairs Annual
1192:02:45, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
1169:02:19, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
1107:17:16, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
3743:WikiProject Religion articles
3718:Low-importance India articles
3686:22:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
3673:20:55, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
3651:20:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
3206:I added the following lines:
2542:05:16, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
2512:02:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
2488:20:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
2466:18:09, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
2450:04:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
2364:, if the actual statement is
1814:Panicker, P. L. John (2006).
1505:) or in English Translation (
1448:10:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
1433:20:11, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
1419:18:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
1405:13:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
1390:13:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
1376:13:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
1361:13:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
1342:12:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
1327:18:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
1296:04:52, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
1281:17:52, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
1248:Removal of Dayananda's views.
1242:21:03, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
1217:criticism is poorly explained
1151:21:07, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
753:List of free online resources
674:and see a list of open tasks.
570:Template:WikiProject Religion
70:Put new text under old text.
3624:15:45, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
3384:15:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
3353:04:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
3320:04:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
3302:02:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
3288:21:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
3271:04:29, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
3180:15:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
3166:15:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
3152:21:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
3136:10:14, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
3104:21:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
3089:10:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
3074:08:26, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
3047:04:15, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
3023:02:14, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
3000:01:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
2968:13:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
2952:03:49, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
2431:Removal of "Status of women"
2426:18:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2385:20:48, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2352:18:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2337:18:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2288:17:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2273:17:33, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2236:17:24, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2222:17:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2201:16:54, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2180:16:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2166:16:38, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2149:16:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2135:16:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2116:14:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2067:13:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2049:13:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2035:13:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
2013:13:14, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
1999:13:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
1958:11:50, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
1937:09:24, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
1923:09:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
1898:02:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
1884:20:07, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
1870:19:52, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
1848:19:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
1786:02:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
1721:18:57, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
1706:07:17, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
1692:07:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
1675:06:49, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
1661:06:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
1644:06:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
1627:06:27, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
1613:06:21, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
1599:05:23, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
999:Articles on notable atheists
683:Template:WikiProject Atheism
309:Template:WikiProject Jainism
3544:09:56, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
2818:14:07, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
2804:13:45, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
2790:13:38, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
2768:13:35, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
2751:13:12, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
2699:13:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
2685:13:05, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
2671:13:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
2657:12:58, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
2639:12:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
2623:11:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
2578:14:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
2309:. Oxford University Press.
3769:
3728:WikiProject India articles
2776:not Indian Affairs Annual
1037:: discuss whether you are
706:project's importance scale
593:project's importance scale
448:project's importance scale
425:Template:WikiProject India
334:project's importance scale
3733:C-Class Religion articles
3529:This seems wrong because
2605:extremely revived, while
2438:Jain schools and branches
1476:I have read the original
1212:09:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
973:write for an encyclopedia
712:
699:
648:
608:
586:
503:
463:
441:
372:
327:
264:
243:
108:Be welcoming to newcomers
3748:C-Class Atheism articles
3703:C-Class Jainism articles
3126:. Except these sources.
861:Join WikiProject atheism
737:Project's main talk page
557:standards, or visit the
276:This article is part of
2303:Sokal, Alan D. (2008).
968:and add to accordingly.
781:About original research
3713:C-Class India articles
3216:
3204:
2739:
2611:
2595:
2566:
2414:
1828:Criticism of jainism..
1268:
1247:
1051:Clarify references in
758:Writing about religion
605:
460:
225:This article is rated
103:avoid personal attacks
3308:User_talk:Bladesmulti
2729:. As per Indian law,
2675:What other source? --
2409:
1304:Following reverts by
912:"The perfect article"
809:the "Atheism" article
611:Interfaith work group
604:
459:
229:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
128:Neutral point of view
3420:The named reference
3340:Hinduism and Jainism
2865:The named reference
1987:Jainism and Hinduism
1983:Criticism of Jainism
1202:Karma (nitya-nigoda)
1141:September 2011 (UTC)
535:WikiProject Religion
133:No original research
53:Criticism of Jainism
3601:of being naked and
2794:What's the matter?
2057:is not gonna help.
1018:Immediate attention
982:Articles to improve
892:Help out with this
764:Article development
663:WikiProject Atheism
279:WikiProject Jainism
3124:Dayanand Saraswati
2721:, commonly called
2121:Fine, now back to
1260:wrote in his book
1258:Dayanand Saraswati
948:atheism references
880:Help with articles
606:
547:assess and improve
461:
299:Naming conventions
231:content assessment
114:dispute resolution
75:
3612:
3611:
2609:began to decline.
2315:978-0-19-923920-7
1837:
1632:User talk:Malaiya
1561:
1547:comment added by
1306:User:Ohnoitsjamie
1232:comment added by
1083:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1075:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1066:
937:Maintenance, etc.
916:Featured articles
885:See this month's
786:Assume good faith
775:Verifying sources
627:
626:
623:
622:
573:Religion articles
561:for more details.
476:
475:
472:
471:
403:WikiProject India
344:
343:
340:
339:
211:
210:
94:Assume good faith
71:
42:
41:
3760:
3662:
3643:It needs to go.
3586:
3571:
3570:
3558:
3507:
3506:
3494:
3488:
3487:
3475:
3464:
3463:
3451:
3442:
3437:
3431:
3430:
3429:
3423:
3415:
3409:
3408:
3406:
3405:
3394:
2916:
2913:
2907:
2904:
2898:
2897:
2885:
2876:
2875:
2874:
2868:
2860:
2854:
2853:
2851:
2850:
2839:
2591:Karma in Jainism
2382:
2381:
2374:
2373:
2323:
2270:
2269:
2262:
2261:
2219:
2218:
2211:
2210:
2113:
2112:
2105:
2104:
1955:
1954:
1947:
1946:
1920:
1919:
1912:
1911:
1867:
1866:
1859:
1858:
1832:
1820:
1819:
1811:
1579:Satyarth Prakash
1560:
1541:
1478:Satyarth Prakash
1263:Satyarth Prakash
1244:
1096:
1059:Secular movement
1055:using footnotes.
959:deletion process
887:adopt-an-article
824:
823:
714:
688:
687:
686:Atheism articles
684:
681:
678:
657:
650:
649:
644:
636:
629:
575:
574:
571:
568:
565:
559:wikiproject page
528:
523:
522:
512:
505:
504:
499:
496:
485:
478:
430:
429:
426:
423:
420:
397:
392:
391:
390:
381:
374:
373:
368:
367:
366:
361:
353:
346:
314:
313:
312:Jainism articles
310:
307:
304:
273:
266:
265:
260:
252:
245:
228:
222:
221:
213:
207:
206:
192:
123:Article policies
44:
23:
16:
3768:
3767:
3763:
3762:
3761:
3759:
3758:
3757:
3693:
3692:
3656:
3631:
3581:
3576:
3575:
3574:
3564:
3559:
3555:
3531:Jain philosophy
3520:Majjhima Nikāya
3516:
3514:Wrong criticism
3511:
3510:
3500:
3495:
3491:
3481:
3476:
3467:
3457:
3452:
3445:
3438:
3434:
3421:
3419:
3417:
3412:
3403:
3401:
3396:
3395:
3391:
3367:
3192:
3094:revise them. --
2926:
2921:
2920:
2919:
2914:
2910:
2905:
2901:
2891:
2886:
2879:
2866:
2864:
2862:
2857:
2848:
2846:
2841:
2840:
2836:
2715:
2554:
2433:
2395:
2379:
2378:
2372:Joshua Jonathan
2371:
2370:
2316:
2302:
2296:
2267:
2266:
2260:Joshua Jonathan
2259:
2258:
2216:
2215:
2209:Joshua Jonathan
2208:
2207:
2110:
2109:
2103:Joshua Jonathan
2102:
2101:
2019:Joshua Jonathan
1976:
1952:
1951:
1945:Joshua Jonathan
1944:
1943:
1917:
1916:
1910:Joshua Jonathan
1909:
1908:
1864:
1863:
1857:Joshua Jonathan
1856:
1855:
1830:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1818:. ISPCK. p. 39.
1813:
1812:
1808:
1679:Ok this source
1587:reliable source
1542:
1250:
1227:
1219:
1204:
1153:
1103:
1094:
1088:
1011:an atheism stub
853:
821:
820:
798:Recent activity
685:
682:
679:
676:
675:
642:
572:
569:
566:
563:
562:
526:Religion portal
524:
517:
497:
491:
427:
424:
421:
418:
417:
393:
388:
386:
362:
359:
311:
308:
305:
302:
301:
295:Manual of Style
258:
226:
149:
144:
143:
142:
119:
89:
12:
11:
5:
3766:
3764:
3756:
3755:
3750:
3745:
3740:
3735:
3730:
3725:
3720:
3715:
3710:
3705:
3695:
3694:
3691:
3690:
3689:
3688:
3676:
3675:
3630:
3627:
3610:
3609:
3606:
3590:
3580:
3577:
3573:
3572:
3552:
3551:
3547:
3515:
3512:
3509:
3508:
3489:
3465:
3443:
3432:
3410:
3388:
3387:
3366:
3363:
3362:
3361:
3360:
3359:
3358:
3357:
3356:
3355:
3329:
3328:
3327:
3326:
3325:
3324:
3323:
3322:
3254:
3253:
3250:
3235:
3232:
3191:
3188:
3187:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3182:
3155:
3154:
3117:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3113:
3112:
3111:
3110:
3109:
3108:
3107:
3106:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3051:
3050:
3049:
3030:
3029:
3028:
3027:
3026:
3025:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2971:
2970:
2925:
2922:
2918:
2917:
2908:
2899:
2877:
2855:
2833:
2832:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2714:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2708:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2701:
2642:
2641:
2553:
2550:
2549:
2548:
2547:
2546:
2545:
2544:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2493:
2492:
2491:
2490:
2469:
2468:
2432:
2429:
2394:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2388:
2387:
2355:
2354:
2325:
2324:
2314:
2295:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2251:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2189:so large notes
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
1975:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1829:
1826:
1822:
1821:
1805:
1804:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1762:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1646:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1299:
1298:
1249:
1246:
1234:106.204.213.43
1218:
1215:
1203:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1143:106.204.213.43
1140:
1139:
1138:
1126:
1123:
1116:
1113:
1101:
1087:
1084:
1081:
1080:
1077:
1076:
1073:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1056:
1049:
1028:
1014:
1013:
1003:
1001:
1000:
991:
990:
978:
977:
976:
969:
962:
951:
944:Citing sources
934:
933:
926:
919:
898:
897:
890:
883:
877:
855:
854:
852:
851:
846:
841:
836:
830:
828:
822:
819:
818:
813:
812:
811:
795:
794:
783:
769:Citing sources
766:
755:
744:
742:Article layout
739:
730:
729:
719:
718:
710:
709:
702:Low-importance
698:
692:
691:
689:
672:the discussion
658:
646:
645:
643:Low‑importance
637:
625:
624:
621:
620:
607:
597:
596:
589:Low-importance
585:
579:
578:
576:
530:
529:
513:
501:
500:
498:Low‑importance
486:
474:
473:
470:
469:
462:
452:
451:
444:Low-importance
440:
434:
433:
431:
428:India articles
399:
398:
382:
370:
369:
360:Low‑importance
354:
342:
341:
338:
337:
330:Low-importance
326:
320:
319:
317:
316:
315:
274:
262:
261:
259:Low‑importance
253:
241:
240:
234:
223:
209:
208:
146:
145:
141:
140:
135:
130:
121:
120:
118:
117:
110:
105:
96:
90:
88:
87:
76:
67:
66:
63:
62:
56:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3765:
3754:
3751:
3749:
3746:
3744:
3741:
3739:
3736:
3734:
3731:
3729:
3726:
3724:
3721:
3719:
3716:
3714:
3711:
3709:
3706:
3704:
3701:
3700:
3698:
3687:
3684:
3680:
3679:
3678:
3677:
3674:
3670:
3666:
3660:
3655:
3654:
3653:
3652:
3649:
3644:
3641:
3638:
3634:
3628:
3626:
3625:
3621:
3617:
3604:
3600:
3595:
3594:Yuktiprabodha
3591:
3587:
3584:
3579:Women section
3578:
3568:
3562:
3557:
3554:
3550:
3546:
3545:
3541:
3537:
3532:
3527:
3525:
3521:
3513:
3504:
3499:, p. 122-123.
3498:
3493:
3490:
3485:
3479:
3474:
3472:
3470:
3466:
3461:
3455:
3450:
3448:
3444:
3441:
3436:
3433:
3427:
3414:
3411:
3399:
3393:
3390:
3386:
3385:
3382:
3376:
3373:
3370:
3364:
3354:
3350:
3346:
3341:
3337:
3336:
3335:
3334:
3333:
3332:
3331:
3330:
3321:
3317:
3313:
3312:74.192.84.101
3309:
3305:
3304:
3303:
3299:
3295:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3285:
3281:
3277:
3276:
3275:
3274:
3273:
3272:
3268:
3264:
3259:
3251:
3248:
3244:
3240:
3236:
3233:
3230:
3226:
3222:
3218:
3217:
3215:
3213:
3207:
3203:
3201:
3195:
3189:
3181:
3177:
3173:
3169:
3168:
3167:
3164:
3159:
3158:
3157:
3156:
3153:
3149:
3145:
3140:
3139:
3138:
3137:
3133:
3129:
3125:
3121:
3105:
3101:
3097:
3092:
3091:
3090:
3086:
3082:
3077:
3076:
3075:
3071:
3067:
3062:
3061:
3060:
3059:
3058:
3057:
3056:
3055:
3048:
3044:
3040:
3036:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3032:
3031:
3024:
3020:
3016:
3012:
3008:
3003:
3002:
3001:
2997:
2993:
2988:
2987:
2986:
2985:
2979:
2975:
2974:
2973:
2972:
2969:
2965:
2961:
2956:
2955:
2954:
2953:
2949:
2945:
2940:
2936:
2933:
2931:
2923:
2912:
2909:
2903:
2900:
2895:
2889:
2884:
2882:
2878:
2872:
2859:
2856:
2844:
2838:
2835:
2831:
2819:
2815:
2811:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2801:
2797:
2793:
2792:
2791:
2787:
2783:
2779:
2775:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2765:
2761:
2758:
2755:
2754:
2753:
2752:
2748:
2744:
2738:
2736:
2732:
2728:
2724:
2720:
2712:
2700:
2696:
2692:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2682:
2678:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2668:
2664:
2660:
2659:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2627:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2620:
2616:
2610:
2608:
2604:
2598:
2594:
2592:
2588:
2583:
2580:
2579:
2575:
2571:
2565:
2563:
2557:
2551:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2531:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2513:
2509:
2505:
2501:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2489:
2485:
2481:
2477:
2473:
2472:
2471:
2470:
2467:
2463:
2459:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2447:
2443:
2439:
2430:
2428:
2427:
2423:
2419:
2413:
2408:
2406:
2401:
2399:
2392:
2386:
2383:
2375:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2353:
2349:
2345:
2341:
2340:
2339:
2338:
2334:
2330:
2322:
2317:
2312:
2308:
2307:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2271:
2263:
2255:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2220:
2212:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2119:
2118:
2117:
2114:
2106:
2098:
2096:
2094:
2092:
2089:
2087:
2085:
2083:
2080:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2051:
2050:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2001:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1973:
1959:
1956:
1948:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1921:
1913:
1905:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1868:
1860:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1836:
1827:
1817:
1810:
1807:
1803:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1774:
1772:
1768:
1763:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1647:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1349:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1315:
1313:
1312:User:Jethwarp
1309:
1307:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1267:
1265:
1264:
1259:
1253:
1245:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1223:
1216:
1214:
1213:
1210:
1201:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1136:
1132:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1117:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1105:
1104:
1098:
1097:
1085:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1050:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1035:False dilemma
1032:
1029:
1026:
1025:State atheism
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1012:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
998:
997:
996:
995:
989:
986:
985:
984:
983:
979:
974:
970:
967:
963:
960:
956:
952:
949:
945:
941:
940:
939:
938:
931:
927:
924:
920:
917:
913:
909:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:Be consistent
895:
891:
888:
884:
881:
878:
875:
871:
870:
869:
868:
866:
862:
857:
856:
850:
847:
845:
842:
840:
837:
835:
832:
831:
829:
826:
825:
817:
814:
810:
807:
806:
805:
804:Core articles
802:
801:
800:
799:
793:
790:
787:
784:
782:
779:
776:
773:
770:
767:
765:
762:
759:
756:
754:
751:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
734:
733:
728:
726:
721:
720:
716:
715:
711:
707:
703:
697:
694:
693:
690:
673:
669:
665:
664:
659:
656:
652:
651:
647:
641:
638:
635:
631:
618:
617:
612:
603:
599:
598:
594:
590:
584:
581:
580:
577:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
543:
538:
537:
536:
527:
521:
516:
514:
511:
507:
506:
502:
495:
490:
487:
484:
480:
467:
458:
454:
453:
449:
445:
439:
436:
435:
432:
415:
414:
409:
405:
404:
396:
385:
383:
380:
376:
375:
371:
358:
355:
352:
348:
335:
331:
325:
322:
321:
318:
300:
296:
292:
291:
289:
285:
281:
280:
275:
272:
268:
267:
263:
257:
254:
251:
247:
242:
238:
232:
224:
220:
215:
214:
205:
201:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
152:
151:Find sources:
148:
147:
139:
138:Verifiability
136:
134:
131:
129:
126:
125:
124:
115:
111:
109:
106:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
85:
81:
80:Learn to edit
77:
74:
69:
68:
65:
64:
60:
54:
50:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
3645:
3642:
3639:
3635:
3632:
3613:
3602:
3598:
3593:
3582:
3561:Krishan 1997
3556:
3548:
3528:
3523:
3519:
3517:
3492:
3435:
3418:Cite error:
3413:
3402:. Retrieved
3392:
3377:
3374:
3371:
3368:
3257:
3255:
3246:
3242:
3238:
3228:
3224:
3211:
3209:
3205:
3197:
3193:
3118:
3010:
2941:
2937:
2934:
2929:
2927:
2911:
2902:
2863:Cite error:
2858:
2847:. Retrieved
2837:
2829:
2777:
2773:
2740:
2722:
2717:
2612:
2600:
2596:
2587:Adi Shankara
2585:
2581:
2567:
2559:
2555:
2434:
2415:
2410:
2402:
2396:
2365:
2361:
2326:
2319:
2305:
2297:
2252:
2188:
2079:encyclopedic
2078:
2075:
2023:Swaminarayan
2002:
1977:
1904:edit summary
1833:Copied from
1831:
1815:
1809:
1801:
1765:perspective.
1758:
1582:
1543:— Preceding
1347:
1269:
1261:
1256:Philosopher
1255:
1251:
1228:— Preceding
1224:
1220:
1205:
1137:) 05:33, 13
1119:
1099:
1092:
1089:
1042:
1038:
1031:False choice
1017:
1016:
1015:
1004:
1002:
993:
992:
981:
980:
936:
935:
908:layout style
900:
899:
859:
858:
797:
796:
788:
777:
771:
760:
749:
731:
725:project page
722:
701:
661:
614:
588:
549:articles to
540:
533:
532:
465:
443:
413:project page
411:
401:
395:India portal
329:
293:Guidelines:
288:project page
277:
237:WikiProjects
199:
193:
185:
178:
172:
166:
160:
150:
122:
47:This is the
35:
3592:texts like
3294:Bladesmulti
3258:anekant.org
3172:Bladesmulti
3128:Bladesmulti
3081:Bladesmulti
2960:Itsmejudith
2888:Pandey 1978
2796:Bladesmulti
2760:Bladesmulti
2723:Sallenkhana
2691:Bladesmulti
2663:Bladesmulti
2631:Bladesmulti
2458:Bladesmulti
2418:Bladesmulti
2405:Paul Dundas
2380:Let's talk!
2344:Bladesmulti
2280:Bladesmulti
2268:Let's talk!
2228:Bladesmulti
2217:Let's talk!
2193:Bladesmulti
2158:Bladesmulti
2127:Bladesmulti
2111:Let's talk!
2059:Bladesmulti
2027:Bladesmulti
1953:Let's talk!
1929:Bladesmulti
1918:Let's talk!
1890:Bladesmulti
1876:Bladesmulti
1865:Let's talk!
1840:Bladesmulti
1778:Bladesmulti
1713:Bladesmulti
1684:Bladesmulti
1653:Bladesmulti
1636:Bladesmulti
1605:Bladesmulti
1440:Bladesmulti
1425:Bladesmulti
1397:Bladesmulti
1368:Bladesmulti
1348:philosopher
1334:Bladesmulti
1288:Bladesmulti
1086:Problematic
1045:this merge
988:Agnosticism
176:free images
59:not a forum
3697:Categories
3549:References
3404:2011-09-27
3280:Tryptofish
3144:Tryptofish
3120:Tryptofish
3096:Tryptofish
3015:Tryptofish
2992:-Abhishikt
2930:criticisms
2849:2011-09-27
2830:References
2731:euthanasia
2480:-Abhishikt
2123:Sam Harris
1802:References
964:Watch the
955:neologisms
894:to-do list
732:Quick help
494:Interfaith
466:April 2012
3480:, p. 122.
3456:, p. 121.
3426:help page
3229:digambara
2871:help page
2735:Rajasthan
2407:puts it:
1184:Abhishikt
1161:Abhishikt
1131:Abhishikt
116:if needed
99:Be polite
49:talk page
3345:Jethwarp
3039:Jethwarp
2719:Santhara
2713:Santhara
2603:Hinduism
2504:Jethwarp
2254:WP:POINT
2184:Try this
1761:(p. 96).
1557:contribs
1545:unsigned
1230:unsigned
923:info box
792:Be civil
616:inactive
564:Religion
542:Religion
489:Religion
84:get help
57:This is
55:article.
28:deletion
3683:Falerin
3659:Falerin
3648:Falerin
3563:, p. 64
3381:Falerin
3163:Falerin
2890:, p. 1.
2607:Jainism
2393:Atheism
1767:Malaiya
1549:Malaiya
1482:Malaiya
1222:valid.
1053:Atheism
1043:against
971:Always
930:Atheism
874:userbox
865:be bold
839:history
704:on the
677:Atheism
668:atheism
640:Atheism
591:on the
446:on the
332:on the
303:Jainism
284:Jainism
256:Jainism
227:C-class
182:WP refs
170:scholar
3497:Balbir
3478:Balbir
3454:Balbir
3247:himsic
3239:nature
3221:moksha
3212:sangha
3200:moksha
2562:moksha
2530:WP:RSN
2476:source
2294:Harris
1102:smash!
1095:Ogress
1005:Expand
994:Create
872:Add a
827:To do
233:scale.
154:Google
3616:Nimit
3599:shame
3536:Nimit
3263:Rahul
3225:moksa
3066:Rahul
2944:Rahul
2810:Rahul
2782:Rahul
2756:Does,
2743:Rahul
2727:India
2677:Rahul
2649:Rahul
2615:Rahul
2570:Rahul
2534:Rahul
2442:Rahul
2329:Rahul
2172:Rahul
2141:Rahul
2041:Rahul
2005:Rahul
1991:Rahul
1698:Rahul
1667:Rahul
1649:Rahul
1619:Rahul
1591:Rahul
1411:Rahul
1382:Rahul
1353:Rahul
1319:Rahul
1273:Rahul
1209:Rtalk
1033:into
849:purge
844:watch
419:India
408:India
357:India
197:JSTOR
158:books
112:Seek
3669:talk
3620:talk
3603:fear
3567:help
3540:talk
3524:mind
3503:help
3484:help
3460:help
3349:talk
3316:talk
3298:talk
3284:talk
3267:talk
3243:body
3176:talk
3148:talk
3132:talk
3100:talk
3085:talk
3070:talk
3043:talk
3019:talk
3011:that
2996:talk
2978:here
2964:talk
2948:talk
2894:help
2814:talk
2800:talk
2786:talk
2780:. --
2778:2006
2774:2007
2764:talk
2747:talk
2695:talk
2681:talk
2667:talk
2653:talk
2635:talk
2619:talk
2574:talk
2538:talk
2508:talk
2484:talk
2462:talk
2446:talk
2422:talk
2348:talk
2333:talk
2311:ISBN
2284:talk
2232:talk
2197:talk
2176:talk
2162:talk
2145:talk
2131:talk
2063:talk
2045:talk
2031:talk
2009:talk
1995:talk
1989:. --
1933:talk
1894:talk
1880:talk
1844:talk
1782:talk
1771:talk
1717:talk
1702:talk
1688:talk
1671:talk
1657:talk
1640:talk
1623:talk
1609:talk
1595:talk
1553:talk
1486:talk
1444:talk
1429:talk
1415:talk
1401:talk
1386:talk
1372:talk
1357:talk
1338:talk
1323:talk
1310:and
1292:talk
1277:talk
1238:talk
1188:talk
1165:talk
1147:talk
1135:talk
1047:here
946:and
914:and
863:and
834:edit
553:and
551:good
190:FENS
164:news
101:and
36:keep
34:was
3665:जैन
2998:)
2486:)
1583:not
1581:is
1190:)
1167:)
1041:or
1039:for
696:Low
583:Low
555:1.0
438:Low
324:Low
204:TWL
3699::
3671:)
3646:—
3622:)
3608:”
3589:“
3542:)
3468:^
3446:^
3428:).
3422:ZZ
3351:)
3318:)
3300:)
3286:)
3269:)
3261:--
3178:)
3150:)
3142:--
3134:)
3102:)
3087:)
3072:)
3064:--
3045:)
3021:)
2966:)
2950:)
2880:^
2873:).
2867:ZZ
2816:)
2802:)
2788:)
2766:)
2749:)
2697:)
2683:)
2669:)
2655:)
2637:)
2621:)
2576:)
2540:)
2510:)
2464:)
2448:)
2424:)
2368:?
2350:)
2335:)
2318:.
2286:)
2256:.
2234:)
2199:)
2178:)
2164:)
2156:.
2147:)
2133:)
2125:.
2065:)
2047:)
2033:)
2011:)
1997:)
1935:)
1896:)
1882:)
1846:)
1784:)
1773:)
1719:)
1704:)
1690:)
1682:.
1673:)
1659:)
1642:)
1625:)
1611:)
1597:)
1589:.
1585:a
1559:)
1555:•
1446:)
1431:)
1417:)
1403:)
1388:)
1374:)
1359:)
1351:--
1340:)
1325:)
1294:)
1279:)
1240:)
1149:)
961:).
950:).
918:).
910:,
727:.
492::
297:–
184:)
82:;
3667:(
3661::
3657:@
3618:(
3569:)
3538:(
3534:-
3505:)
3486:)
3462:)
3407:.
3347:(
3314:(
3296:(
3282:(
3265:(
3174:(
3146:(
3130:(
3098:(
3083:(
3068:(
3041:(
3017:(
2994:(
2962:(
2946:(
2896:)
2852:.
2812:(
2798:(
2784:(
2762:(
2745:(
2693:(
2679:(
2665:(
2651:(
2633:(
2617:(
2572:(
2536:(
2506:(
2482:(
2460:(
2444:(
2420:(
2376:-
2346:(
2331:(
2282:(
2264:-
2230:(
2213:-
2195:(
2174:(
2160:(
2143:(
2129:(
2107:-
2061:(
2043:(
2029:(
2007:(
1993:(
1949:-
1931:(
1914:-
1892:(
1878:(
1861:-
1842:(
1780:(
1769:(
1715:(
1700:(
1686:(
1669:(
1655:(
1638:(
1621:(
1607:(
1593:(
1551:(
1488:)
1484:(
1442:(
1427:(
1413:(
1399:(
1384:(
1370:(
1355:(
1336:(
1321:(
1290:(
1275:(
1236:(
1186:(
1163:(
1145:(
1133:(
1122:"
1118:"
975:.
925:)
896:.
889:.
882:.
867:.
789:·
778:·
772:·
761:·
750:·
708:.
619:.
595:.
468:.
450:.
416:.
336:.
239::
200:·
194:·
186:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
156:(
86:.
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
