301:
21:
167:
838:
sources, while the second sentence states "However since the 1990s, this term has largely referred to the
Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, a highly influential discourse on the far right without any clear relationship to Marxist cultural analysis." again with multiple sources, and between these, the use of "Cultural Marxism" to refer to "Marxist cultural analysis" predates the use of the term to refer to the conspiracy theory by more than half a century.
185:
136:
1082:, should confirm what anyone who has watched its evolution knows: that the term was not originally a perjorative term, it was purely descriptive, and was used rather loosely to refer to cover a common approach to literary and cultural studies of the sort pioneered in Critical Theory by the Frankfurt School, but also in British Marxist literary studies as found in Raymond Williams and his students.
256:
75:
493:
465:, newly created on 11 September 2020. My guess is that this change of the redirect into an article will not be very controversial. The original problem was that people were trying to make Cultural Marxism into a real thing and not just a bugaboo. It would be helpful if somebody would officially close the discussion at
1214:
and thewre are plenty of peer reviewed articles form the 1`990s and 1980s. It does not matter what opinion of someone in 2019 is! There was wide . WORLDWIDE , publication on "Cultural
Marxism" in the 1990s and 1980s and before! And they were poublished by marxist and left leaning academics and not by
882:
There is already a ton of sources provided that show the term refers to both the cultural
Marxism conspiracy theory(which is sourced as having been in use since the 1990's by detractors) and Marxist cultural analysis(which has been used by supporters since the 1930's). This is enough evidence to show
791:
Looking at the relevant Talk pages should be enough to demonstrate the ambiguity of the term on this page and justify offering both to those interested in the subject, and as contentious as the discussions may be, I believe that the simplest solution is to offer readers to look for the meaning they
615:
but please let me save you some time before you go and bother them. The redirect is correct. It is not going to be changed. There is no magical rhetorical formula that you can contrive which will bamboozle us into changing it incorrectly. All you are doing is annoying people and it is time to stop
1073:
The fact that the term was littered throughout scholarly literature for decades can quickly be seen by entering it in Google scholar. It has also been commonly used as a conversational shorthand for decades and, in all likelihood, even before the term initially appeared in print in 1973 in Trent
837:
have used it interchangeably with "Cultural
Marxism"? In fact, the first sentence of the third paragraph states: "Since the 1930s, the tradition of Marxist cultural analysis has occasionally also been referred to as "cultural Marxism", in reference to Marxist ideas about culture." with multiple
675:
It doesn't matter if multiple editirs say
Cultural Marxism should not have its own entry in Knowledge and should instyead redirect to a Conspiracy Theory entry if they happen to be WRONG and Cultural Marxism is #NOT a conspiracy theory. How does one get Cultural Marxism to have its own actually
1210:
You cant use a 2019 Source to propose a field of study is a conspiracy theoryu when BOOKS were published decades before in thaty academioc field! Dennis
Dworkin. Cultural Marxism in Postwar Britain: History, the New Left, and the Origins of Cultural Studies. (Post-Contemporary Interventions.)
852:
If you look closely enough at the history of the articles you are citing, you will see that I wrote quite a bit of what you are quoting - I am familiar with what each article says. You are failing to distinguish between "cultural
Marxism" (the typical term for the synonym of Marxist cultural
787:
as to how the articles should be named, I've changed the page to offer links to both articles. Both articles have links to each other, and one of the few mutual agreements between both sides of the discussion on both of the pages concede that the term "Cultural
Marxism" can refer to both the
939:
That isnht true! Cultural
Marxism was used decades before the Modern conspiracy Theory! For example Dennis Dworkin. Cultural Marxism in Postwar Britain: History, the New Left, and the Origins of Cultural Studies. (Post-Contemporary Interventions.) Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. 1997.
833:"it is only subscribers to the conspiracy theory who argue the contrary" is a very biased POV position to take on the subject. Both articles reference the fact that the term is used for each other. How is Cultural Marxism exclusively defined as a conspiracy theory when proponents of
283:
The redirect is not appropriate and seems to represent a clumsy attempt an censorship. This phrase has entered into fairly common usage now and merits a page of its own. The reference to the frankfurt school can be a link, but that obscure historical usage is at most a footnote.
1155:
Exactly my point, though. Neither has any demonstrated expertise in conspiracy theories, or on the
Frankfurt School, or on the Birmingham School for that matter. They situate themselves outside of "cultural Marxism" according to every attempt you have made to define it.
1063:
is informed in unambiguous wikivoice that "cultural Marxism" is a phrase that is also used entirely free of conspiracy connotations to refer to the Frankfurt School or Birmingham School. In 2014 and other times, a wrongful local consensus has formed against following
1120:. The phrase has been used aleatorically to refer to any number of things, but there isn't any notable or consistent usage outside of the conspiracy theory (and only a minority of recent RS even entertain the question, which you propose to answer, against policy, in
819:, which have both reached the opposite conclusion. The usage of "Cultural Marxism" as a synonym of Marxist cultural analysis has always been at the periphery of the field, and it is only subscribers to the conspiracy theory who argue the contrary.
644:
2020 or 2010 is irrelevant! Cultural Marxism was an established academic field in the 1980s and 1990s and it is being misdirected to a page which claims Cultural Marxism is and always a far Right conspiracy Theory. How do Knowledge correct this?
337:
I am not sure how much can be written about "Cultural Marxism" on its own other than that it's a conspiracy theory, and giving examples of the term being thrown by right-wing celebrities. It hasn't got a rich history like the
792:
intended to find, rather than favoring one over the other. And again, both pages refer to each other, and both have very well sourced claims that the term "Culutral Marxism" is used to refer to each depending on the context.
546:. The conspiracy theory isn't related to any "real Cultural Marxism", because the conspiracy theory isn't based on anything real, and the field of study you are talking about was never widely known as "Cultural Marxism".
115:
549:
Perhaps more to the point: repeated, widely participated discussions have consistently reached the consensus that the only encyclopaedic topic referred to as "Cultural Marxism" is the conspiracy theory.
1088:
The arguments in favor of deleting the entry were were passionate, but grossly methodologically deficient in appraising what counts as "evidence" for the meaning of any term, or existence of a practice.
985:
Dennis Dworkin. Cultural Marxism in Postwar Britain: History, the New Left, and the Origins of Cultural Studies. (Post-Contemporary Interventions.) Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. 1997.
630:
Why is there no Knowledge entry for "Cultural Marxism" and why is the page for Cultural Marxism diverting to a conspiracy Theory entry when Cultural Marxism is NOT a conspiracy theory?
450:
95:
694:, as in this case, then that is what the article of that name is about. The existence of article(s) about the other topic(s) is identified at the top of the primary article using a
809:
the term "Cultural Marxism" can refer to both the application of Marxist theory to critique of things other than class, or to the alt-right conspiracy theory that uses it as a basis
853:
analysis) and "Cultural Marxism", the trope of the conspiracy theory. The proper noun, "Cultural Marxism", was essentially never used prior to the advent of the conspiracy theory.
965:: the term "cultural Marxism" refers to the conspiracy theory; they are one and the same. The redirect should stay (and perhaps should be EC protected, or fully protected). --
1138:
Beibei Guan is a lecturer of European philosophy who did her doctoral thesis on Baudelaire and Benjamin. Wayne Cristaudo is Chair of Politics at Charles Darwin University.
1078:. That a collection of interviews on North America's leading Marxist literary theorist, Frederic Jameson, edited by Ian Buchanan in 2007, could appear under the name
366:
979:
No it doesnt and the talk sectioon of the redirect says that the Conspiracy Throry is a different topic to the previously established field of Cultural Marxism!
708:. So you would need to write an article (or section of an article) about the academic field and then use the hatnote mechanism to highlight it. Does that help?
923:
AfD is that the conspiracy theory is the only RS topic with this name. If you are convinced of the contrary, "Redirects for Discussion" is the relevant venue.
1248:
1253:
1118:
that "cultural Marxism" is a phrase that is also used entirely free of conspiracy connotations to refer to the Frankfurt School or Birmingham School
816:
577:
61:
1050:
this particular proposal. The common usage of "cultural Marxism" is at the very least in the culture war, if not an outright conspiracy theory.
308:
346:, or similar ones. Perhaps if someone writes a draft with richer content, it could be considered to be established as an independent article.
1243:
730:, but an overwhelming consensus has concluded on at least five occasions that the main topic of "Cultural Marxism" is the conspiracy theory.
213:
1116:- well, that consensus isn't reflected in these co-authors writing outside their field to defend their choice of book title, and it isn't
722:
Please note that Knowledge's preferred article title for "Marxist cultural studies"/"the cultural turn in Marxism"/"cultural Marxism" is
343:
339:
400:
or other admins, the redirect is broken because the section from that article has been removed and a separate article has been created
780:
462:
401:
37:
788:
application of Marxist theory to critique of things other than class, or to the alt-right conspiracy theory that uses it as a basis.
192:
172:
501:
307:
it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a
812:
1020:
910:
551:
147:
856:
As I previously suggested, please read the Talk pages of the two articles before launching a third front here. Thanks.
1031:
That's because the usage of "Cultural Marxism" in relation to the conspiracy theory is far and away the PRIMARYTOPIC.
378:
212:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1139:
834:
784:
723:
543:
81:
690:
There are many cases where a topic name has multiple meanings and thus multiple articles. When there is a clear
906:
611:
There does not seem to be a redirect proposal active at the moment. The correct place to start one would be at
528:
Why is there no Cultural Marxism Knowledge entry and why is is being redirected to a Conspiracy Theory page?
691:
414:
289:
262:
135:
47:
105:
1193:
1161:
1129:
1036:
928:
861:
824:
735:
661:
And in case you think that Daniel's assessment is just a single voice, let me assure you that it isn't. --
559:
328:
608:
That was back in 2020. People have been kvetching about this for ages and it never gets anybody anywhere.
580:
which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —
369:. It closed with no consensus to overturn but mentioned the possibility of discussion elsewhere. Thanks,
970:
905:. Your editing career is likely to be short if you continue edit-warring against established consensus.
902:
621:
466:
454:
425:
285:
153:
20:
1008:
474:
461:. Samwalton6 left the redirect fully protected, it just goes to a new place, the separate article on
440:
74:
702:
1108:
You are quoting two non-experts, launching broadsides in the preface to a book which is not about
1179:
1146:
1098:
888:
843:
797:
779:, healthy compromise, ease of finding information, and in light of the lack of consensus in both
410:
31:
1005:
Bit underhand that Cultural Marxism redirects here, and not to Marxist cultural analysis page.
351:
1189:
1157:
1125:
1032:
1016:
924:
857:
820:
731:
695:
555:
312:
542:"Cultural Marxism" was never the primary name given to the field that Knowledge addresses as
1171:
966:
920:
727:
617:
184:
166:
759:
This thread has been dead for more than a year. There is no point in trying to revive it.
485:
470:
458:
429:
395:
365:
In case editors may overlook it, there was a deletion review last September as seen here:
1220:
993:
945:
811:- no, there is no agreement on this premise. Please see the recent discussions on both
776:
681:
650:
635:
595:
533:
374:
42:
27:
1237:
1175:
1142:
1094:
1069:
Baudelaire Contra Benjamin: A Critique of Politicized Aesthetics and Cultural Marxism
898:
884:
839:
793:
713:
666:
612:
581:
511:
347:
205:
201:
1012:
53:
919:(e-c) The consensus reached consistently in many, many discussions since the 2014
883:
that the term refers to two subjects commonly enough to require a disambiguation.
676:
factually true and reliable entry and not be misconstrued as a Conspiracy theory?
590:
and on that page they say to come here? Looks like a Knowledge conspiracy? :)
209:
1216:
1112:
in either of the senses you are discussing. If you actually intend to bring
989:
941:
677:
646:
631:
591:
529:
370:
84:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
1224:
1197:
1183:
1165:
1150:
1133:
1102:
1076:
The Critique of Domination: The Origins and Development of Critical Theory
1040:
1024:
997:
974:
949:
932:
914:
901:. You are not welcome to simply ignore the existing consensus because you
892:
865:
847:
828:
801:
739:
717:
685:
670:
654:
639:
625:
599:
584:
563:
537:
519:
478:
444:
418:
382:
355:
331:
293:
709:
662:
506:
451:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 11#Cultural Marxism
1090:
As an editor, I 100% endorse the position of Guan and Cristaudo on this.
197:
988:
So why is this subject entry being redirected to a conspiracy theory?
404:. Please could you fix the redirect so it goes there instead?
250:
129:
69:
15:
1188:
Sources for what, though? I can't demonstrate a negative.
1061:
no matter what redirect or link they used to get there
1054:
bringing the actual consensus of RS to the topic area.
1080:
Jameson on Jameson: Conversations on Cultural Marxism
554:, but there isn't any evidence that it actually has.
196:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
424:Done - looks like there's sufficient consensus at
897:You're welcome to open a new RFC to attempt to
367:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2018 September 6
8:
1114:the actual consensus of RS to the topic area
726:. You could propose to move that article to
1059:What's important is ensuring that a reader
1211:Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. 1997.
1006:
764:The following discussion has been closed.
755:
576:There is a move discussion in progress on
161:
247:Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2018
146:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
1174:your personal OR again. Bring sources.
817:Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory
578:Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory
163:
62:Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1087:
1072:
808:
190:This redirect is within the scope of
133:
7:
41:Because this page is not frequently
344:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
152:It is of interest to the following
781:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory
463:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory
402:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory
45:, present and future discussions,
38:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory
14:
1249:NA-importance Skepticism articles
1086:Regarding the 2014 RfC, it says,
1067:As Guan and Cristaudo explain in
491:
299:
254:
222:Knowledge:WikiProject Skepticism
183:
165:
134:
73:
19:
1254:WikiProject Skepticism articles
225:Template:WikiProject Skepticism
80:This article was nominated for
813:Talk:Marxist cultural analysis
585:18:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
520:16:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
479:14:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
449:For further discussion, go to
445:12:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
419:12:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
1198:18:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1184:17:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1166:17:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1151:17:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1134:17:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1103:17:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1041:16:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
1025:16:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
975:19:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
933:02:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
915:02:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
899:change the existing consensus
893:02:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
866:01:45, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
848:01:39, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
829:01:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
802:00:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
383:18:01, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
216:and see a list of open tasks.
1244:NA-Class Skepticism articles
467:Talk:Frankfurt School#Split?
455:Talk:Frankfurt School#Split?
426:Talk:Frankfurt_School#Split?
1225:17:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
998:17:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
950:17:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
740:00:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
718:22:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
686:20:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
671:20:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
655:20:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
640:20:43, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
626:18:21, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
600:09:41, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
572:Move discussion in progress
564:02:18, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
538:17:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
277:to reactivate your request.
265:has been answered. Set the
1270:
356:10:19, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
835:Marxist cultural analysis
785:Marxist cultural analysis
752:Convert to disambiguation
724:Marxist cultural analysis
544:Marxist cultural analysis
178:
160:
94:, 11 September 2020, see
767:Please do not modify it.
114:, 22 December 2014, see
104:, 6 September 2018, see
102:No consensus to overturn
332:19:45, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
294:19:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
34:that targets the page:
1215:extreme right groups!
457:as mentioned above by
193:WikiProject Skepticism
1122:unambiguous wikivoice
552:WP:CONSENSUSCANCHANGE
57:should take place at:
907:NorthBySouthBaranof
428:for a new article.
228:Skepticism articles
112:Delete and redirect
1170:I am not going to
1140:WP:SOURCEGOODFAITH
388:Redirect is broken
148:content assessment
56:
50:
1232:
1231:
1027:
1011:comment added by
775:In the spirit of
281:
280:
244:
243:
240:
239:
236:
235:
128:
127:
124:
123:
68:
67:
52:
46:
1261:
1110:Cultural Marxism
921:Cultural Marxism
769:
756:
728:Cultural Marxism
707:
701:
692:WP:primary topic
518:
509:
499:
495:
494:
489:
399:
325:
322:
319:
316:
311:if appropriate.
303:
302:
272:
268:
258:
257:
251:
230:
229:
226:
223:
220:
187:
180:
179:
169:
162:
139:
138:
130:
86:
85:
77:
70:
23:
16:
1269:
1268:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1234:
1233:
963:Oppose disambig
765:
754:
705:
699:
574:
507:
505:
492:
490:
483:
459:User:Samwalton9
393:
390:
363:
361:Deletion review
340:New World Order
323:
320:
317:
314:
309:reliable source
300:
270:
266:
255:
249:
227:
224:
221:
218:
217:
54:requested moves
12:
11:
5:
1267:
1265:
1257:
1256:
1251:
1246:
1236:
1235:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1212:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1092:
1091:
1084:
1065:
1056:
1055:
1044:
1043:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
986:
983:
980:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
937:
936:
935:
917:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
854:
771:
770:
761:
760:
753:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
720:
659:
658:
657:
642:
616:doing that. --
609:
603:
602:
573:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
547:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
389:
386:
362:
359:
335:
334:
279:
278:
259:
248:
245:
242:
241:
238:
237:
234:
233:
231:
214:the discussion
188:
176:
175:
170:
158:
157:
151:
140:
126:
125:
122:
121:
120:
119:
109:
99:
78:
66:
65:
58:
40:
35:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1266:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1247:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1239:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1213:
1209:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1141:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1089:
1085:
1083:
1081:
1077:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1046:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
999:
995:
991:
987:
984:
981:
978:
977:
976:
972:
968:
964:
961:
960:
951:
947:
943:
938:
934:
930:
926:
922:
918:
916:
912:
908:
904:
903:don't like it
900:
896:
895:
894:
890:
886:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
850:
849:
845:
841:
836:
832:
831:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
789:
786:
782:
778:
773:
772:
768:
763:
762:
758:
757:
751:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
719:
715:
711:
704:
697:
693:
689:
688:
687:
683:
679:
674:
673:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
643:
641:
637:
633:
629:
628:
627:
623:
619:
614:
610:
607:
606:
605:
604:
601:
597:
593:
589:
588:
587:
586:
583:
579:
571:
565:
561:
557:
553:
548:
545:
541:
540:
539:
535:
531:
527:
521:
517:
515:
510:
503:
498:
487:
482:
481:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
447:
446:
442:
438:
436:
432:
427:
423:
422:
421:
420:
416:
412:
411:John Cummings
408:
405:
403:
397:
387:
385:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
360:
358:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
333:
330:
327:
326:
310:
306:
298:
297:
296:
295:
291:
287:
286:Helper0237621
276:
273:parameter to
264:
260:
253:
252:
246:
232:
215:
211:
207:
206:pseudohistory
203:
202:pseudoscience
199:
195:
194:
189:
186:
182:
181:
177:
174:
171:
168:
164:
159:
155:
149:
145:
141:
137:
132:
131:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
97:
93:
90:
89:
88:
87:
83:
79:
76:
72:
71:
64:
63:
55:
49:
48:edit requests
44:
39:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1190:Newimpartial
1158:Newimpartial
1126:Newimpartial
1093:
1079:
1075:
1068:
1060:
1051:
1047:
1033:Newimpartial
1007:— Preceding
1004:
962:
925:Newimpartial
858:Newimpartial
821:Newimpartial
790:
774:
766:
732:Newimpartial
575:
556:Newimpartial
513:
496:
434:
430:
409:
406:
391:
364:
336:
313:
304:
282:
274:
263:edit request
191:
154:WikiProjects
143:
111:
101:
91:
60:
26:This is the
1074:Schroyer's
982:For example
967:K.e.coffman
618:DanielRigal
453:. See also
1238:Categories
703:other uses
696:WP:hatnote
502:my request
486:EdJohnston
471:EdJohnston
396:EdJohnston
267:|answered=
219:Skepticism
210:skepticism
173:Skepticism
116:discussion
106:discussion
96:discussion
1172:WP:REHASH
305:Not done:
28:talk page
1176:Sennalen
1143:Sennalen
1095:Sennalen
1071:(2019):
1021:contribs
1009:unsigned
885:Nerfdart
840:Nerfdart
794:Nerfdart
698:such as
582:RMCD bot
144:redirect
92:Retarget
82:deletion
32:redirect
1052:Support
1013:Obsteve
777:WP:BOLD
407:Thanks
379:contrib
198:science
43:watched
1048:Oppose
710:𝕁𝕄𝔽
663:𝕁𝕄𝔽
613:WP:RfD
329:(talk)
150:scale.
437:alton
348:BeŻet
271:|ans=
261:This
142:This
30:of a
1221:talk
1217:Isaw
1194:talk
1180:talk
1162:talk
1147:talk
1130:talk
1099:talk
1037:talk
1017:talk
994:talk
990:Isaw
971:talk
946:talk
942:Isaw
929:talk
911:talk
889:talk
862:talk
844:talk
825:talk
815:and
807:Re:
798:talk
783:and
736:talk
714:talk
682:talk
678:Isaw
667:talk
651:talk
647:Isaw
636:talk
632:Isaw
622:talk
596:talk
592:Isaw
560:talk
534:talk
530:Isaw
514:Talk
500:per
497:Done
475:talk
441:talk
415:talk
375:talk
371:Erik
352:talk
290:talk
208:and
51:and
1124:).
1064:RS.
508:MJL
504:. –
433:am
392:Hi
381:)
324:Fir
321:een
318:rgr
315:Eve
269:or
59:•
36:•
1240::
1223:)
1196:)
1182:)
1164:)
1149:)
1132:)
1101:)
1039:)
1023:)
1019:•
996:)
973:)
948:)
931:)
913:)
891:)
864:)
846:)
827:)
800:)
738:)
716:)
706:}}
700:{{
684:)
669:)
653:)
638:)
624:)
598:)
562:)
536:)
477:)
469:.
443:)
417:)
377:|
354:)
342:,
292:)
275:no
204:,
200:,
1219:(
1192:(
1178:(
1160:(
1145:(
1128:(
1097:(
1035:(
1015:(
992:(
969:(
944:(
927:(
909:(
887:(
860:(
842:(
823:(
796:(
734:(
712:(
680:(
665:(
649:(
634:(
620:(
594:(
558:(
532:(
516:‐
512:‐
488::
484:@
473:(
439:(
435:W
431:S
413:(
398::
394:@
373:(
350:(
288:(
156::
118:.
108:.
98:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
