240:
common in 1915 as it is today. The soldiers were known as 'Anzacs', the holiday as 'Anzac Day' and the location as 'Anzac Cove' and the 'Anzac sector'. All contemporary sources refer to these as proper nuns, not as fully-capitalised acronyms. For references see the
Knowledge discussion on the 'Anzac Day' page. Similarly, I Anzac Corps and II Anzac Corps were not named 'I ANZAC Corps' and 'II ANZAC Corps' (besides which the the final 'C' in 'ANZAC' stands for 'Corps' anyway), and the Anzac Mounted Division was not named 'ANZAC Mounted Division'.
22:
85:
Anzac - a type of biscuit (cookie) made to an original
Scottish recipe from, inter alia, rolled oats, sugar, plain flour, coconut, butter, golden syrup or treacle but no eggs providing, when appropriately packed, good keeping qualities which enabled them to be sent as comforts to Australian and New
239:
The original term 'ANZAC' began as a telegraphic address. We refer to it now as an 'acronym', but that terminology was never used in contemporary writing on the topic, probably because the use of acronyms - and I mean the actual definition of an acronym , not an abbreviation - was nowhere near as
567:
I'm of pretty much the same view as
Orderinchaos. This article probably belongs at ANZAC, since it is an acronym. In other uses it's largely regarded as an adjectival word, so lower-casing the latter letteres makes sense. I see no rerason why there shouldn't be redirects from the alternative
741:
are the actual names of those places so their articles are titled appropriately. I was interested to find that ANZAC park in
Raymond Terrace is listed on the NSW Geographical Names Register as "Anzac Park". I've seen the actual paperwork used to register that name and I've seen the return
215:
is currently a disambiguation page listing Anzac biscuits and so forth. Every single thing on the page is named after the
Australian and NZ Army Corps, so it seems a bit ridiculous for ANZAC to be a disambiguation page rather than a redirect to here. I propose making
194:
It seems reasonable that these two articles should be merged. The existance of two similarly named articles is confusing. I am not familiar enought with the content to do the merge, but I am adding a "see also" to both pages, so that users can find both.
631:
Keeping this article at this title seems fine, as I suppose this article actually discusses the usage of "ANZAC" as an acronym, rather than, say, discussing what the Anzac spirit is for example. I'm more interested in moving the other articles, like
714:
While I agree with using lowercase when the word is used as an adjective, I'd also argue that we should be very careful about which form we use and, where the capitalisation is questionable, we should defer to ANZAC as the original form.
699:. For the TV(hmm Tv, tv...) series again the article should be at what ever the official title is(plus dab/qualifier), I do agree with Labattblueboy ANZACS/Anzacs should redirect to this article with a hat note for the dab page.
694:
for this page as its the acronym. For the place, street names caution should be exercised to ensure the capitalisations are consistant with the official naming. Where its used as an adjective I support the change to
140:
series. It seems it was cut and pasted first from "Anzac" to "ANZAC" and then to "Australian and New
Zealand Army Corps" so somehow the edit histories need to be merged, at least between "Anzac" and this article.
719:
is one such case. I had hoped to find an official document that confirmed the spelling but I haven't been successful. The RTA page is titled "Anzac Bridge" but refers to "ANZAC Bridge" in the opening sentence.
50:
storing this here for now: "Within
Australia (I am unsure about New Zealand) the ANZACs came to stood not just for the troops in World War I, but for Australian soliders in time of war more generally."
722:
The reason for renaming the bridge would imply that "ANZAC" is the correct spelling but various photos of the bridge don't help confirm that either, even though they do show "ANZAC", not "Anzac".
558:
as it is an acronym when referring to the Corps, but when used as an adjective, I agree that common usage means it would be "Anzac" in other articles - eg Anzac Day, Anzac biscuits and so on.
108:
lower down. They should be together, one after the other. When I tried to do that, however, they ended up side-by-side which looks crap. Can someone make them vertically under each other?
344:, writing in all capitals is discouraged in Knowledge, so it would make sense to change the usage of "ANZAC" to "Anzac". Some articles are already at the usage I am proposing, such as
176:
172:
159:
152:
537:
Thanks for commenting. I think with the tv show, you could just use a hatnote to direct people looking for the
Australian and New Zealand Army Corps, but whatever works.
352:. Sorry about there being so many pages involved in the move, but I believe the policy is consistant for all of them. Note for the television show, currently at
47:
Readers are going to be going to their local supermarket asking the sales clerks which aisle the "inter alia" is in. Couldn't we say it in
English?
842:
814:
333:
62:
682:
We should do what reliable sources do. Reliable sources are about 50-50 on this. Therefore there is no reason to change our own usage, yet.
653:
Whilst some organisations have a policy of dropping the capitals for acronymns (e.g. The
Guardian), this isn't the case for wikipedia. See
175:
article has a confusingly redundant title. Either that, or the "Army Corps (army corps)" article should be renamed (see discussion on the
507:, I think the qualifier is needed. The term Anzacs appears to be more commonly used describe pluralized ANZAC troops. So I'd like to see
865:
637:
538:
488:. I know the term principally as the acronym in all caps (WWI history) so I am going to differ to Australians and kiwis on this one.
361:
54:
The above, minus the parenthetical comment, is already on the main page. Better a crime of omission than comission, IMHO. --KQ
743:
137:
720:
933:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
256:
136:
where it started from? It doesn't have a great deal to do with the corps and so is out of place amongst the rest of the
33:
778:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
285:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
946:
340:) has entered common usage, as a word representing Australia–New Zealand co-operation as these articles show. Per
294:
mass move. No prejudice to discussing individual cases where move is warranted on the relevant talk page. —
854:
822:
733:, which is named after the ANZACS. (They weren't referred to as "Anzacs" at the time). As far as I'm aware,
598:
569:
524:
465:
21:
919:
869:
864:
I'd be inclined to keep them seperate, but you do have a point in that much of the content is duplicated.
751:
734:
641:
573:
559:
542:
461:
424:
420:
415:
411:
365:
329:
217:
188:
Can't there be more about New Zealand because they were in this organisation two, note the NZ in ANZAC.
69:
into a disambiguation page, but someone might want to merge the content here if they think it's useful.
252:
888:
670:
244:
703:
683:
619:
225:
163:
248:
196:
850:
818:
738:
607:
586:
520:
504:
500:
492:
456:
447:
442:
438:
353:
915:
747:
341:
90:==Why only Australian Army== on the top right. Surely there should be a NZ flag etc as well!
312:
73:
171:
I agree. There is a lot of redundant material duplicated between the two articles and the
884:
666:
301:
849:
relates to the WWI Corps. I certainly view the Corps as the primary topics. Opinions? --
725:
Being based on the spirit of the original ANZACS, which used the all uppercase acronym,
742:
confirmation using "ANZAC" so even official registers seem to vary the capitalisation.
700:
349:
221:
129:
109:
940:
633:
602:
581:
379:
375:
902:
769:
726:
716:
397:
393:
388:
384:
276:
91:
70:
730:
433:
429:
406:
402:
296:
345:
142:
180:
654:
508:
496:
452:
357:
65:. I don't think the biscuits are important enough to warrant turning
723:
576:
or vice versa, and this page's article should have a redirect from
846:
838:
810:
662:
577:
512:
485:
481:
337:
324:
320:
212:
133:
66:
58:
658:
15:
883:
If not identical topics then at least a very heavy overlap.
923:
906:
892:
873:
858:
826:
755:
706:
686:
674:
645:
622:
613:
592:
562:
546:
528:
369:
304:
260:
229:
199:
183:
166:
145:
112:
94:
568:
capitalisations in some cases, though - we should have an
220:
the disambiguation page, and ANZAC a redirect to here. --
275:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
356:, the disambiguator "(TV series)" is not required, as
768:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
104:
with two curly brackets on each end. There's also a
799:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
132:
article, anyway. Can this article be moved back to
636:. I'll strike out the move request for this page.
160:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (army corps)
153:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (army corps)
618:You've never looked at the street sign then. ;-)
914:Both are short, intimately related articles. --
802:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
8:
86:Zealand troops in overseas theatres of war.
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
744:Electronic media isn't always accurate
843:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
815:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
334:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
63:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
19:
7:
793:The following discussion is closed.
729:seems appropriately titled, as does
128:There's already an well-established
290:The result of the move request was
158:Why is there a separate article at
100:That's a template box pulled in by
328:— While "ANZAC" was originally an
14:
177:Army Corps (army corps) talk page
929:The discussion above is closed.
20:
597:FWIW, I have never, ever, seen
900:: seems like a sensible idea.
601:in Dunedin spelt in all caps.
162:? Should the two be merged?--
1:
924:19:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
907:18:03, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
893:07:05, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
874:18:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
859:18:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
756:08:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
707:16:16, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
687:06:52, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
675:05:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
646:23:17, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
623:05:11, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
614:00:13, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
593:22:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
563:21:13, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
547:18:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
529:18:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
370:16:09, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
113:09:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
95:00:34, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
599:Anzac Square or Anzac Avenue
261:04:12, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
184:02:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
167:10:15, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
827:09:58, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
305:05:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
57:I moved the following from
963:
348:, which was moved after a
200:16:19, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
76:16:09, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)
360:already redirects there.
230:03:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
931:Please do not modify it.
796:Please do not modify it.
775:Please do not modify it.
282:Please do not modify it.
173:Army Corps (army corps)
146:12:05, 1 May 2004 (UTC)
61:and redirected that to
574:ANZAC (disambiguation)
570:Anzac (disambiguation)
556:Oppose at this article
466:Anzac (disambiguation)
462:ANZAC (disambiguation)
425:Anzac Square, Brisbane
421:ANZAC Square, Brisbane
416:Anzac Parade, Canberra
412:ANZAC Parade, Canberra
336:, the word (much like
218:ANZAC (disambiguation)
845:. All the content of
151:Proposed merger with
350:discussion last year
837:Proposed merger of
739:ANZAC War Memorial
505:Anzacs (TV series)
501:ANZACS (TV series)
499:. I would support
493:ANZACS (TV series)
457:Anzacs (TV series)
448:ANZACS (TV series)
443:Anzac War Memorial
439:ANZAC War Memorial
354:ANZACS (TV series)
34:content assessment
947:NA-Class articles
610:
589:
519:the remainder. --
292:consensus against
264:
247:comment added by
40:
39:
954:
798:
785:Merge discussion
777:
608:
587:
580:, for instance.
515:, not the show.
316:
303:
299:
284:
263:
241:
106:New Zealand Army
25:
24:
16:
962:
961:
957:
956:
955:
953:
952:
951:
937:
936:
935:
934:
834:
806:The result was
794:
787:
782:
773:
764:
572:redirecting to
474:
310:
297:
295:
280:
270:
242:
237:
210:
156:
119:External Links
102:Australian Army
45:
12:
11:
5:
960:
958:
950:
949:
939:
938:
928:
927:
926:
909:
895:
877:
876:
836:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
789:
788:
786:
783:
781:
780:
770:requested move
763:
760:
759:
758:
709:
689:
677:
648:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
565:
552:
551:
550:
549:
532:
531:
473:
470:
469:
468:
459:
445:
436:
427:
418:
409:
400:
391:
382:
308:
288:
287:
277:requested move
271:
269:
268:Requested move
266:
236:
233:
209:
208:ANZAC redirect
206:
204:
155:
149:
130:Anzac biscuits
126:
125:
124:
123:
122:
116:
115:
88:
87:
82:
81:
44:
41:
38:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
959:
948:
945:
944:
942:
932:
925:
921:
917:
913:
912:Support merge
910:
908:
905:
904:
899:
898:Support merge
896:
894:
890:
886:
882:
881:Support Merge
879:
878:
875:
871:
867:
863:
862:
861:
860:
856:
852:
851:Labattblueboy
848:
844:
840:
828:
824:
820:
819:Labattblueboy
816:
812:
809:
805:
804:
803:
800:
797:
791:
790:
784:
779:
776:
771:
766:
765:
761:
757:
753:
749:
745:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
721:
718:
713:
710:
708:
705:
702:
698:
693:
690:
688:
685:
681:
678:
676:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
649:
647:
643:
639:
635:
634:Anzac biscuit
630:
624:
621:
617:
616:
615:
612:
611:
604:
600:
596:
595:
594:
591:
590:
583:
579:
575:
571:
566:
564:
561:
557:
554:
553:
548:
544:
540:
536:
535:
534:
533:
530:
526:
522:
521:Labattblueboy
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
491:
487:
483:
479:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
460:
458:
455:
454:
449:
446:
444:
440:
437:
435:
431:
428:
426:
422:
419:
417:
413:
410:
408:
404:
401:
399:
395:
392:
390:
386:
383:
381:
380:Anzac biscuit
377:
376:ANZAC biscuit
374:
373:
372:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
322:
317:
314:
307:
306:
302:
300:
293:
286:
283:
278:
273:
272:
267:
265:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
235:ANZAC / Anzac
234:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
207:
205:
202:
201:
198:
192:
189:
186:
185:
182:
178:
174:
169:
168:
165:
161:
154:
150:
148:
147:
144:
139:
135:
131:
121:
120:
118:
117:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
98:
97:
96:
93:
84:
83:
79:
78:
77:
75:
72:
68:
64:
60:
55:
52:
48:
42:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
930:
916:AussieLegend
911:
901:
897:
880:
866:84.92.117.93
835:
807:
801:
795:
792:
774:
767:
748:AussieLegend
735:ANZAC Parade
727:ANZAC spirit
717:ANZAC Bridge
711:
696:
691:
679:
650:
638:84.92.117.93
606:
585:
560:Orderinchaos
555:
539:84.92.117.93
516:
489:
477:
451:
398:Anzac Bridge
394:ANZAC Bridge
389:Anzac spirit
385:ANZAC spirit
362:84.92.117.93
319:
318:
309:
291:
289:
281:
274:
238:
211:
203:
193:
190:
187:
170:
164:A Y Arktos
157:
127:
105:
101:
89:
56:
53:
49:
46:
29:
243:—Preceding
885:Digestible
762:Discussion
731:ANZAC Cove
697:Anzac xxxx
667:Digestible
434:Anzac Test
430:ANZAC Test
407:Anzac Cove
403:ANZAC Cove
342:WP:ALLCAPS
684:Hesperian
620:Hesperian
511:point to
346:Anzac Day
222:Helenalex
143:Geoff/Gsl
110:Shermozle
941:Category
603:Grutness
582:Grutness
332:for the
257:contribs
245:unsigned
30:redirect
903:Sceptre
680:Oppose.
665:et al.
517:Support
478:Neutral
330:acronym
313:movereq
249:Hayaman
197:Chimpex
138:1st AIF
92:Hamedog
712:Oppose
692:Oppose
655:UNICEF
651:Oppose
509:Anzacs
497:Anzacs
490:Oppose
472:Survey
453:Anzacs
358:Anzacs
71:Angela
36:scale.
847:Anzac
841:into
839:ANZAC
817:. --
813:into
811:ANZAC
808:merge
704:garra
663:ASEAN
578:Anzac
513:Anzac
486:Anzac
482:ANZAC
338:sonar
325:Anzac
321:ANZAC
213:ANZAC
134:Anzac
80:also:
67:Anzac
59:Anzac
28:This
920:talk
889:talk
870:talk
855:talk
823:talk
752:talk
746:! --
737:and
701:Gnan
671:talk
659:NATO
642:talk
609:wha?
588:wha?
543:talk
525:talk
366:talk
253:talk
226:talk
179:).
43:Misc
772:.
605:...
584:...
480:on
191:--
943::
922:)
891:)
872:)
857:)
825:)
754:)
673:)
661:,
657:,
644:)
545:)
527:)
503:→
495:→
484:→
464:→
450:→
441:→
432:→
423:→
414:→
405:→
396:→
387:→
378:→
368:)
323:→
315:}}
311:{{
298:æk
279:.
259:)
255:•
228:)
181:Hu
918:(
887:(
868:(
853:(
821:(
750:(
669:(
640:(
541:(
523:(
364:(
251:(
224:(
74:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.