434:
1394:(1917)|Battle of Tel el Khuweilfe|Third Battle of Gaza|Battle of Hareira and Sheria|Charge at Sheria|Charge at Huj|Capture of the Wadi el Hesi|Battle of Mughar Ridge|Battle of Jerusalem (1917)|Battle of Megiddo (1918)|Battle of Sharon (1918)|Battle of Tulkarm|Battle of Tabsor|Battle of Arara|Battle of Nazareth|Capture of Afulah and Beisan|Capture of Jenin|Battle of Haifa (1918)|Battle of Samakh (1918)|Battle of Nablus (1918)|Third Transjordan attack (1918)|Battle of Jisr Benat Yakub|Charge at Irbid|Charge at Kaukab|Charge at Kiswe|Capture of Damascus (1918)|Pursuit to Haritan|Battle of Aleppo (1918)
632:
489:
1216:
the units with the Desert
Mounted Corps in Palestine, and the Australian units and individuals in England, Salonika, Mesopotamia, Iraq, India and elsewhere. It was initially commanded by Major General W. T. Bridges, then by Major General J. G. Legge, and finally Major General A. J. Godley, before Birdwood finally assumed command of the AIF in 1916, and held it until after the end of the war. So yes, he commanded I Anzac Corps, and later the Australian Corps, and still later the British Fifth Army at the same time.
693:
672:
586:
418:
703:
503:
462:
303:
513:
610:
482:
202:
375:
364:
353:
342:
331:
261:
651:
233:
785:
595:
472:
425:
243:
1314:
I think as regular eds we are somewhat overestimating our average users understanding of our commonplace functions such as disambiguation. My point is that we should have a see also section to assist our less WP savvy casual users. I think it would perhaps increase
Wikiwandering on the subject to the
1215:
First of all, the AIF was a force within the
Australian Army, much as the Army Reserve and the Australian Regular Army are today, with its own promotion lists and what not. It consisted of all Army personnel enlisted or commissioned into it. Yes, it included I and II Anzac Corps, but it also included
1191:
Basically, from what I've understood was that the AIF was composed of originally the ANZAC, then both I and II ANZACs, then the
Australian Corps. Can someone please enlighten me? Was the AIF an actual unit? The way the articles are written, it seems as if they were all different units serving at the
1275:
Ok, makes sense, thanks for the clarification. I served 8 months in the Stan but was never in the same battle group as
Aussies, so I didn't know they still work like that. It seems like an extra unnecessary bureaucratic level, but that is normal in the army. Perhaps this should be mentioned in the
1259:
control over
Australian Corps. Australian soldiers received different pay from their counterparts in other armies, which came from the Australian government. AIF HQ controlled promotions, and men could be moved from one theatre to another. Australians also had some different items of equipment, such
956:
You don't seem to understand how disambiguation works. "1916" would make sense if there was a similar formation in a different year, but there isn't. There is an article about the acronym/term "Anzac" as the primary topic (right or wrong) and there is an article about the army corps disambiguated
1298:
Does this article require a see also section that contains links to Anzac topics covered under the disambiguation page. Are there Anzac article on the disambiguation page that \are of higher eminence than others? I can see there being a place for Anzac Day and Anzac spirit, but nothing beyond that
1254:
control over the
Australia Corps, just as the Australian Corps exercised operational control over British and American units assigned to it. So it was still under the same chain of command as the British, Canadian and American units it was fighting alongside. AIF Headquarters, which was located in
918:
You gave no justification for the merger in your comment so I replied in kind. As I stated in my comment to the first suggestion, this article is about the army corps, that article is about the various uses and applications of the term "Anzac". They serve two different purposes and should not be
1231:
So what unit/commander was the AIF subordinated to then, especially in regards to the order of battle? Seems counter-intuitive to have one corps on the
Western Front under a totally different chain of command than the others it is fighting alongside of. Command and Control must have been a
1393:
Sinai and
Palestine Campaign|Raid on the Suez Canal|Battle of Romani|Battle of Magdhaba|Battle of Rafa|First Battle of Gaza|Second Battle of Gaza|Stalemate in Southern Palestine|Raid on Asluj to Hafir el Auja railway|Battle of Buqqar Ridge|Southern Palestine Offensive|Battle of Beersheba
1315:
casual user and we may even get some new contributing Eds on the subject if we give them an opening. Ive a feeling that DIS is not understood as a tool for arguably many of our users. A see also section AND a DIS wikilink covers all the bases. Just a thought mate. Cheers
1260:
as felt hats. And
Australian units were organised on Australian tables of equipment laid down by AIF HQ, which differed from those of the British Army. This is all quite normal in coalition warfare, and is the way the Australian contingent in Afghanistan functions today.
1664:
600:
1073:
Hi, im a secondary student writing an essay on the ANZAC's. I can't seem to find the age requirements for enlistment for Australians in the AIF. Please if anyone knows the age requirements could they let me know. I would very much appreciate it. Thankyou.
1639:
1058:
It seems reasonable that these two articles should be merged. The existance of two similarly named articles is confusing. I am not familiar enought with the content to do the merge, but I am adding a "see also" to both pages, so that users can find both.
1232:
nightmare, neighbouring units on the front having to go all the way up the chain of command just to contact those on its flanks. Not to mention the fact that the AIF was spread across continents, what's the point of a command that is that spread out.
1634:
900:
A bald assertion has little merit. Further, just which suggestion are you objecting to? The merge or the move? Care to put some flesh on the bones? The article should be merged because a lot of the material is already redundantly inside the
164:
976:
I understand how disambiguation works. "Army Corps (army corps)", "Army Corps (GeoffGsl)" and "Army Corps (1916)" all work equally well as far as disambiguation goes, but the first one looks silly, and the last one is relevant.
1374:
Including every possible battle as a see also is not the intended of the template. Because the content clearly took some time to assemble the list is below. It might be approprite as its oen aritcle in the same manner as
998:
You comment demonstrates that you don't understand disambiguation; "army corps" may look silly, but it is correct. "1916" is not relevant unless you are disambiguating from a corps of the same name in another year.
1336:
938:
Then rename it "Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (1916)". Much better than "Army Corps (army corps)". If the other article is really meant to be about the term ANZAC, then it should be called such.
1187:
and this article all contain information for the same sub-units over the same time periods. I am posting this here as this seems to be the most active talk page. Should some of these articles be merged?
1051:
And because Correctness is the most important thing Knowledge can offer, we forget about clarity or usefulness and just steam ahead, damn the torpedoes! At least people will be confused in a correct way.
1250:
The units of the AIF came under various commands. On the Western Front, the Australian Corps came under the British Second and Fourth Armies at various times. Their British Army commanders exercised
1026:
is really about the term, then the proper way to disambiguate it would be to move it to "Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (term)" or "Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC)" and move the
1398:
Yes I agree with the removal of these - given that the ANZA Corps was disbanded in 1916 many of these aren't relevant at any rate (although elements of successor formations fought in these of cse).
441:
247:
55:
158:
1515:
1179:
articles seem to be about the same unit. Am I right? or can someone please explain/elaborate as the articles are scarce on information. The articles I already mentioned as well as
1376:
1027:
316:
273:
817:
Perhaps it is a really silly question, or there is a naming convention somewhere, but why does this article title have the words army corps twice? Why isn't it called
1567:
1563:
1549:
923:
and this to the army corps article. Disambiguating by "World War I" is meaningless as ANZAC only existed during 1916 so the current the current title is fine.
302:
1442:). I suggest we create country-specific subcategories, and articles would then either belong into the parent category, or one of the subcategories. Thoughts?
1679:
763:
753:
1659:
566:
1629:
576:
90:
1684:
1649:
179:
1030:
to "Australian and New Zealand Army Corps". That would make more sense by your criterion. However, I think it would require admin intervention.
433:
1669:
1516:
http://www.webcitation.org/5yfQQLGOQ?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnfsa.gov.au%2Fcollection%2Fnational-collection%2Fsound%2Fsounds-australia%2Fcomplete-list%2F
146:
729:
268:
238:
1674:
1644:
1489:
1110:
1106:
1098:
1023:
902:
876:
861:
844:
832:
818:
803:
277:
96:
35:
1339:
is not free use and not eligible for Knowledge. Even if it is, I have questions as to whether it's appropriate for the article. Thoughts?--
1654:
1236:
1201:
488:
140:
1280:
1078:
Originally it was 18 to 35 years, from June 1915 it was 18 to 45. If you were under 21, you needed parental consent to enlist. See
1137:
716:
677:
136:
1200:? the CEF from its article says it had no actual commander, but Birdwood was commander of ANZAC and the AIF at the same time? --
1176:
542:
529:
467:
110:
41:
1505:
1337:
File:WW100 symbol - New Zealand stylised remembrance poppy commemorating 100-year anniversary activities of Word War One..jpg
186:
115:
31:
831:
They are two separate articles. This article is about the army corps called the "Australian and New Zealand Army Corps".
481:
1519:
85:
1610:
1197:
213:
17:
1439:
879:
article, or it should be moved (renamed) to something like the "Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (World War I)".
76:
1417:
1359:
152:
1434:
Some ANZAC articles cover both Australia and New Zealand, whilst others refer to one of the countries only (e.g.
905:
article, and for the reason of the confusion because of the redundant wording of the title (see section above).
1566:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
835:
is about the acronym "ANZAC" which is short for "Australian and New Zealand Army Corps". It was originally at
864:
is actually not about the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps, but about some acronym? That makes sense why?
1240:
1205:
1601:
1497:
1435:
1384:
1344:
1304:
1284:
272:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
120:
1141:
1403:
1585:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1573:
1413:
1355:
219:
1496:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1615:
1474:
1455:
1421:
1407:
1388:
1363:
1348:
1324:
1308:
1288:
1269:
1244:
1225:
1209:
1160:
1145:
1126:
1086:
1063:
1034:
1003:
981:
961:
943:
927:
909:
893:
883:
851:
825:
1540:
725:
631:
201:
1468:
1449:
822:
172:
66:
1060:
728:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1380:
1340:
1320:
1300:
1265:
1221:
1156:
708:
538:
81:
1570:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
641:
1586:
1461:
Done, and recategorised accordingly. If you spot any issues, either fix them or discuss here.
1399:
791:
62:
1172:
821:? There is another article of that name there - should the two articles be merged? Thanks--
518:
1593:
1506:
https://web.archive.org/web/20081013150933/http://www.rsa.org.nz/remem/anzac_gallipoli.html
1022:
They work, and 1916 is relevant. If you prefer and if you wish to insist that the article
1079:
1552:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1520:
http://nfsa.gov.au/collection/national-collection/sound/sounds-australia/complete-list/
1463:
1444:
1184:
1122:
1592:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
585:
417:
1623:
1316:
1261:
1217:
1180:
1152:
1509:
692:
671:
1665:
High-importance Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
1136:
There are 2 versions on this page: Australian, and Australia. Which is correct?
1559:
721:
502:
461:
1558:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
799:
698:
609:
508:
1640:
Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force articles
1118:
534:
1635:
B-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
1083:
1000:
958:
924:
890:
848:
596:
the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
1031:
978:
940:
906:
880:
622:
1109:. But first I am fixing other articles that have links that point to
426:
Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
260:
232:
1114:
1102:
920:
840:
836:
795:
919:
merged. The ideal solution would be to move the other back to
779:
195:
26:
1196:
or something similar. Was the AIF an umbrella unit like the
1525:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
630:
608:
584:
432:
416:
301:
1500:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1192:
same time. Perhaps in the article leads, one could put
1493:
18:
Talk:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (army corps)
171:
720:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
314:
This article has been checked against the following
1562:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1377:
List of Canadian battles during the First World War
399:
313:
1028:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (army corps)
1331:image of WWI 100 anniversary logo for New Zealand
1047:Quote Gsl: " may look silly, but it is correct."
1510:http://www.rsa.org.nz/remem/anzac_gallipoli.html
533:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of
44:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1548:This message was posted before February 2018.
541:. If you would like to participate, visit the
1276:articles, so that no one else gets confused.
185:
8:
666:
456:
396:
310:
227:
1488:I have just modified 2 external links on
266:This article is within the scope of the
1335:I have serious concerns that the image
875:This article should be merged into the
668:
458:
229:
199:
1412:Yes, I also agree with this. Regards,
286:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
276:. To use this banner, please see the
1537:to let others know (documentation at
1490:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
1111:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
1107:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
1099:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
1024:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
903:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
877:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
862:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
845:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
833:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
819:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
804:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
525:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
289:Template:WikiProject Military history
36:Australian and New Zealand Army Corps
7:
714:This article is within the scope of
1680:Top-importance New Zealand articles
813:Department of Redundancy Department
798:on 24 December 2010. The result of
218:It is of interest to the following
34:for discussing improvements to the
1660:High-importance Australia articles
617:Need help improving this article?
25:
1630:B-Class military history articles
1492:. Please take a moment to review
1097:Now that the article formerly at
738:Knowledge:WikiProject New Zealand
1685:WikiProject New Zealand articles
783:
741:Template:WikiProject New Zealand
701:
691:
670:
649:
511:
501:
487:
480:
460:
373:
362:
351:
340:
329:
259:
231:
200:
56:Click here to start a new topic.
1650:World War I task force articles
1255:London from 1916 on, exercised
1177:First Australian Imperial Force
790:This article was nominated for
758:This article has been rated as
571:This article has been rated as
551:Knowledge:WikiProject Australia
1670:WikiProject Australia articles
645:can be contacted via email to
554:Template:WikiProject Australia
1:
1456:20:45, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
1161:05:08, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
1146:03:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
732:and see a list of open tasks.
657:for non-editorial assistance.
623:National Library of Australia
593:This article is supported by
53:Put new text under old text.
1675:B-Class New Zealand articles
1645:B-Class World War I articles
1616:00:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
1198:Canadian Expeditionary Force
1105:, I'll move this article to
1035:06:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
1004:04:50, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
982:07:51, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
962:05:11, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
944:03:15, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
928:02:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
910:02:07, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
894:01:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
884:01:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
852:10:26, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
826:10:11, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
269:Military history WikiProject
1440:Anzac Day Act (New Zealand)
843:and then cut-and-pasted to
642:Wikimedia Australia chapter
61:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1701:
1655:B-Class Australia articles
1579:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1485:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1364:16:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
1349:22:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
1151:It should be "Australian"
1127:02:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
1117:rather than this article.
1064:16:19, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
764:project's importance scale
726:New Zealand-related topics
577:project's importance scale
334:Referencing and citation:
1475:06:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
1325:03:14, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
1309:00:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
1289:00:00, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
1270:13:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
1245:05:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
1226:03:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
1210:23:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
1132:Which is the correct one?
757:
686:
650:
638:
616:
592:
570:
496:
440:
424:
395:
292:military history articles
254:
226:
91:Be welcoming to newcomers
1354:Agreed, on both points.
1194:"was a part of the ____"
539:Australia-related topics
1481:External links modified
1436:Anzac Day in Queensland
1422:00:01, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
1408:11:16, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
1389:07:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
1087:02:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
839:then cut-and-pasted to
717:WikiProject New Zealand
527:is within the scope of
400:Associated task forces:
345:Coverage and accuracy:
635:
613:
589:
442:World War I task force
437:
421:
378:Supporting materials:
306:
208:This article is rated
86:avoid personal attacks
634:
612:
588:
530:WikiProject Australia
436:
420:
305:
111:Neutral point of view
1560:regular verification
1299:seems appropriate.--
1113:but should point to
957:with "army corps".
744:New Zealand articles
116:No original research
1550:After February 2018
1529:parameter below to
367:Grammar and style:
320:for B-class status:
1604:InternetArchiveBot
1555:InternetArchiveBot
1101:has been moved to
709:New Zealand portal
636:
614:
590:
557:Australia articles
438:
422:
307:
274:list of open tasks
214:content assessment
97:dispute resolution
58:
1580:
889:No it shouldn't.
810:
809:
778:
777:
774:
773:
770:
769:
665:
664:
661:
660:
455:
454:
451:
450:
447:
446:
391:
390:
278:full instructions
194:
193:
77:Assume good faith
54:
16:(Redirected from
1692:
1614:
1605:
1578:
1577:
1556:
1544:
1471:
1466:
1452:
1447:
1414:AustralianRupert
1356:AustralianRupert
1294:See also section
1173:Australian Corps
787:
786:
780:
746:
745:
742:
739:
736:
711:
706:
705:
704:
695:
688:
687:
682:
674:
667:
656:
655:wikimedia.org.au
654:
653:
652:
559:
558:
555:
552:
549:
521:
519:Australia portal
516:
515:
514:
505:
498:
497:
492:
491:
490:
485:
484:
483:
478:
475:
473:Military history
464:
457:
407:
397:
381:
377:
376:
370:
366:
365:
359:
355:
354:
348:
344:
343:
337:
333:
332:
311:
294:
293:
290:
287:
284:
283:Military history
263:
256:
255:
250:
239:Military history
235:
228:
211:
205:
204:
196:
190:
189:
175:
106:Article policies
27:
21:
1700:
1699:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1620:
1619:
1608:
1603:
1571:
1564:have permission
1554:
1538:
1498:this simple FaQ
1483:
1469:
1464:
1450:
1445:
1432:
1372:
1370:List of battles
1333:
1296:
1169:
1134:
1095:
1071:
873:
815:
802:was merge into
784:
743:
740:
737:
734:
733:
707:
702:
700:
680:
648:
646:
619:Ask a Librarian
601:High-importance
573:High-importance
556:
553:
550:
547:
546:
517:
512:
510:
486:
479:
477:High‑importance
476:
470:
405:
379:
374:
368:
363:
357:
352:
346:
341:
335:
330:
291:
288:
285:
282:
281:
241:
212:on Knowledge's
209:
132:
127:
126:
125:
102:
72:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1698:
1696:
1688:
1687:
1682:
1677:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1637:
1632:
1622:
1621:
1598:
1597:
1590:
1523:
1522:
1514:Added archive
1512:
1504:Added archive
1482:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1431:
1430:Category split
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1371:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1332:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1295:
1292:
1273:
1272:
1229:
1228:
1185:II ANZAC Corps
1168:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1133:
1130:
1094:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1070:
1069:A little help.
1067:
1053:
1052:
1046:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
949:
948:
947:
946:
933:
932:
931:
930:
913:
912:
897:
896:
872:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
855:
854:
814:
811:
808:
807:
800:the discussion
788:
776:
775:
772:
771:
768:
767:
760:Top-importance
756:
750:
749:
747:
730:the discussion
713:
712:
696:
684:
683:
681:Top‑importance
675:
663:
662:
659:
658:
637:
627:
626:
615:
605:
604:
591:
581:
580:
569:
563:
562:
560:
523:
522:
506:
494:
493:
465:
453:
452:
449:
448:
445:
444:
439:
429:
428:
423:
413:
412:
410:
408:
402:
401:
393:
392:
389:
388:
386:
384:
383:
382:
371:
360:
349:
338:
324:
323:
321:
308:
298:
297:
295:
264:
252:
251:
236:
224:
223:
217:
206:
192:
191:
129:
128:
124:
123:
118:
113:
104:
103:
101:
100:
93:
88:
79:
73:
71:
70:
59:
50:
49:
46:
45:
39:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1697:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1636:
1633:
1631:
1628:
1627:
1625:
1618:
1617:
1612:
1607:
1606:
1595:
1591:
1588:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1575:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1551:
1546:
1542:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1486:
1480:
1476:
1473:
1472:
1467:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1454:
1453:
1448:
1441:
1437:
1429:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1391:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1381:Labattblueboy
1378:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1341:Labattblueboy
1338:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1301:Labattblueboy
1293:
1291:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1277:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1258:
1257:adminstrative
1253:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1237:70.53.177.226
1233:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1202:70.53.177.226
1199:
1195:
1189:
1186:
1182:
1181:I ANZAC Corps
1178:
1174:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1131:
1129:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1092:
1088:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1068:
1066:
1065:
1062:
1056:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1036:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1005:
1002:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
983:
980:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
963:
960:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
945:
942:
937:
936:
935:
934:
929:
926:
922:
917:
916:
915:
914:
911:
908:
904:
899:
898:
895:
892:
888:
887:
886:
885:
882:
878:
870:
863:
859:
858:
857:
856:
853:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
829:
828:
827:
824:
820:
812:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
782:
781:
765:
761:
755:
752:
751:
748:
731:
727:
723:
719:
718:
710:
699:
697:
694:
690:
689:
685:
679:
676:
673:
669:
644:
643:
633:
629:
628:
624:
620:
611:
607:
606:
602:
599:(assessed as
598:
597:
587:
583:
582:
578:
574:
568:
565:
564:
561:
544:
540:
536:
532:
531:
526:
520:
509:
507:
504:
500:
499:
495:
474:
469:
466:
463:
459:
443:
435:
431:
430:
427:
419:
415:
414:
411:
409:
404:
403:
398:
394:
387:
385:
380:criterion met
372:
369:criterion met
361:
358:criterion met
350:
347:criterion met
339:
336:criterion met
328:
327:
326:
325:
322:
319:
318:
312:
309:
304:
300:
299:
296:
279:
275:
271:
270:
265:
262:
258:
257:
253:
249:
245:
244:South Pacific
240:
237:
234:
230:
225:
221:
215:
207:
203:
198:
197:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
131:
130:
122:
121:Verifiability
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
98:
94:
92:
89:
87:
83:
80:
78:
75:
74:
68:
64:
63:Learn to edit
60:
57:
52:
51:
48:
47:
43:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1602:
1599:
1574:source check
1553:
1547:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1524:
1487:
1484:
1462:
1443:
1433:
1400:Anotherclown
1392:
1373:
1334:
1297:
1281:76.68.196.47
1278:
1274:
1256:
1251:
1234:
1230:
1193:
1190:
1170:
1135:
1096:
1072:
1057:
1054:
1045:
874:
823:A Y Arktos
816:
759:
715:
639:
618:
594:
572:
543:project page
528:
524:
315:
267:
220:WikiProjects
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
105:
30:This is the
1541:Sourcecheck
1252:operational
1138:68.60.53.12
735:New Zealand
722:New Zealand
678:New Zealand
356:Structure:
248:World War I
159:free images
42:not a forum
1624:Categories
1611:Report bug
1594:this tool
1587:this tool
1167:Confusion
1001:Geoff/Gsl
959:Geoff/Gsl
925:Geoff/Gsl
891:Geoff/Gsl
849:Geoff/Gsl
548:Australia
535:Australia
468:Australia
99:if needed
82:Be polite
32:talk page
1600:Cheers.—
1317:Irondome
1262:Hawkeye7
1218:Hawkeye7
1153:Hawkeye7
317:criteria
67:get help
40:This is
38:article.
1527:checked
1494:my edit
1465:Schwede
1446:Schwede
1061:Chimpex
792:merging
762:on the
621:at the
575:on the
210:B-class
165:WP refs
153:scholar
1535:failed
1093:Rename
871:Merge?
216:scale.
137:Google
1115:ANZAC
1103:ANZAC
921:Anzac
841:ANZAC
837:Anzac
796:ANZAC
794:with
180:JSTOR
141:books
95:Seek
1531:true
1438:and
1418:talk
1404:talk
1385:talk
1360:talk
1345:talk
1321:talk
1305:talk
1285:talk
1266:talk
1241:talk
1222:talk
1206:talk
1171:The
1157:talk
1142:talk
1123:talk
1119:Nurg
1080:here
724:and
647:help
640:The
567:High
537:and
173:FENS
147:news
84:and
1568:RfC
1545:).
1533:or
1518:to
1508:to
1175:and
1084:Gsl
1055:--
860:So
847:.
754:Top
187:TWL
1626::
1581:.
1576:}}
1572:{{
1543:}}
1539:{{
1470:66
1451:66
1420:)
1406:)
1387:)
1362:)
1347:)
1323:)
1307:)
1287:)
1279:--
1268:)
1243:)
1235:--
1224:)
1208:)
1183:,
1159:)
1144:)
1125:)
1082:.
1032:Hu
979:Hu
941:Hu
907:Hu
881:Hu
603:).
471::
406:/
246:/
242::
167:)
65:;
1613:)
1609:(
1596:.
1589:.
1416:(
1402:(
1383:(
1379:.
1358:(
1343:(
1319:(
1303:(
1283:(
1264:(
1239:(
1220:(
1204:(
1155:(
1140:(
1121:(
806:.
766:.
625:.
579:.
545:.
280:.
222::
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
69:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
