Knowledge

Talk:American Academy of Financial Management

Source 📝

983:
AAFM included among its Honorary Academic Advisors & Award Winners several prominent industry experts and faculty from around the world. The article criticized the practice of many standards boards of awarding credentials without extra exams; however, the AAFM Board USA does have a practice of granting awards to to those who graduate from its approved law school program or doctorate degrees holders who complete the required exams from government accredited programs without requiring applicants to undergo further exam, citing the AAFM Legal Offices and the FINRA websites. A claim on the AAFM website that it has had a long standing legal trademark agreement with both the
4711:
rights or copyrights etc. This company offered accredited education and courses for years from a law school and ACBSP accredited programs. Thus, the entire article is incoherent out non factual. Even the Wall Street Journal itemizes the exact accredited course and exam requirements in October 2010 which completely debunks the posts made by the hacks who have vandalized this article. It would be best if we can keep the cited information included in the updated article to make a factual article that clarifies the federal court lawsuit and settlement and includes the law school and ACBSP accredited education information. --
4877: 1484:
Websites, all AAFM Certifications require enrollment into accredited program and passing all of the exams. I would know because I completed the accredited degree and exams that lead to certification qualification. AAFM is the only group in the world to accept coursework and exams from accredited business school masters and doctorate programs. Non business school professors may not comprehend this. If you think that accredited business school courses do not require exams, then that would be a problem in this discussion.
714:
certificate/or credential from a 3 day course in Australia from being used in the USA. However, 2210 respects accredited degree educational criteria that is recognized by the US CHEA and Dept of Education. i.e. AACSB and ACBSP double accredited "government recognized" education is accepted from 560 prominent business schools by AAFM via articulation. As Kingbr is based somewhere offshore, it is not expected for Kingbr to comprehend these rules and policies.
454: 433: 3861: 4608:
be changed to a fake unauthorized name. A US Federal Judge has issued an order on this issue exposing Mr. King and you can read it yourself. This is the case where the judge approved claims for fraud, theft, conspiracy and copyright infringement to go against B King and IABFM. If you look at the edits, this kingbr attempted to change the name of this article on dozens of occasions and even fooled the editors.
4549:
be changed to a fake unauthorized name. A US Federal Judge has issued an order on this issue exposing Mr. King and you can read it yourself. This is the case where the judge approved claims for fraud, theft, conspiracy and copyright infringement to go against B King and IABFM. If you look at the edits, this kingbr attempted to change the name of this article on dozens of occasions and even fooled the editors.
251: 220: 2722:(i.e. the third column) for the designation "Chartered Asset Manager" (Look at the third column in the row for the acronym "CAM"). Since this row is highlighted in yellow, it would indicate that this particular designation is a "Finra-monitored credential". I also looked at FINRA's website and it does list the AAFM as the "Issuing organization" for the "Chartered Asset Manager" designation (see 361: 2400:, you will see that this article needs editors with some financial background to make the article accurate, neutral and without COI. RJC and BMK are just mad that they were reported for defamation and fraud and now a few editors are acting like socks for CYA purposes. It looks like they are now taking it out on the AAFM organization. If you look at the article before RJC got involved see: 340: 4763: 863: 464: 546: 864:
http://books.google.com/books?id=SItpcVinZlUC&pg=PA105&dq=%22american+academy+of+financial+management%22+occupational+handbook&hl=en&ei=UhfCTMODLY6ksQOGjqWVDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22american%20academy%20of%20financial%20management%22%20occupational%20handbook&f=false
4027:
Geoffrey Baring and IABFM individually for numerous lawsuit counts in federal court including: (1) theft (2) defamation, (3) breach of contract, (4) intentional interference with contractual relationships,(5) conspiracy, (6) copyright infringement, and (7) fraud violations of the Consumer Protection Act. After this key decision, the case was settled.
1536:, the question is whether to include mention of the fee or whether there is a better way to mention the fact that there are few if any requirements beyond the payment of the fee for these designations and that AAFM's role in the affair is simply to process the fee, in that it does not offer the prerequisite courses itself. 2290:. If, through some miracle, you do not turn out to be at least a meatpuppet, I will print out this article (in a very large font with wide margins) and eat it. Then, I will profusely apologize to you and listen as impartially as I can to what you are saying. Until then, all I hear from you is loud quacking. - 2726:. However, FINRA's website also states that "FINRA does NOT approve or endorse any professional credential or designation." Therefore, while FINRA may "monitor" (i.e. watch, keep track of) designations, it does not necessarily mean that these designations are of a certain quality or meet certain standards.( 637:) RJC - this announcement also appears in the Gulf News, Asian Banker Journal, Singapore Straits Times. I'm guessing the evidence is building sufficiently to allow this revision as clearly the name change is starting to kick-in after what appeared to be an early dispute with disenfranchised US members. 2937:
EconomicTiger's suggestion that I have a COI in regard to AAFM is pure and utter bullshit. I'm a Knowledge editor of long standing with a wide range of interests, not an SPA about AAFM (which EconomicTiger aqppears to be), and if ET makes this claim again against me, I will bring it to the attention
2108:
As for "defamation and fraud", AAFM would need to prove that what we have written is false, harms their reputation and, presumably, that there was malicious intent. Personally, I believe everything I have written here is demonstrably true and my intent is not to harm Mentz/AAFM, merely to communicate
2089:
IMO, the threat is an attempt to shut us up. It says it is "a mere exercise of legal rights to investigate accuracy and competence, and should be valued by Wikimedia as priceless feedback to protect the public against fraud, collusion, misuse of wikipedia, or incompetence." Right, and I'm the Emperor
1595:
One designation, the MFP, or master financial professional, is a "gateway credential," says AAFM president George Mentz. It requires a graduate or undergraduate degree that includes five or more approved business courses and an AAFM certification course. But according to Mr. Mentz, those requirements
1545:
and the mendacity and willingness to engage in sockpuppetry of those affiliated with the AAFM, I am opposed to any wording that implies or leaves open the possibility that AAFM provides anything except the opportunity to pay a fee for the right to use its trademarks as postnomials. I believe that the
1346:
Because I can put only so much into a comment line, I've posted it here. Sources do not support statements to which attached (e.g., that AAFM was "first" at something); directory listings do not warrant a mention and do not suggest endorsement; reworded "criticism" section does not accurately portray
1151:
The article should be expanded to include all press and government recognition such as FINRA US Dept of Labor and the varioius articles from WSJ. Overall, if we delete the facts and global recognition and contracts etc, then the article is useless. If we can not expand the article to include the 3rd
1098:
It is clear, that the author ignored the government documents and other documented and signed evidence. By the way, the AAFM certification requirements (which were copied from the NASD/FINRA) are also outlined on the WSJ website which shows that the article is a JOKE. Somehow Pilon and Zweig missed
844:
All 3 Wall Street Journal Articles about the AAFM are important and so are the US government references to AAFM. The WSJ knew clearly of the education and exam requirements of the AAFM because the governmental NASD and FINRA referenced them for 6 years. Also the WSJ knew or should have known of the
815:
I wouldn't get too sucked in to this. Now Doctorlaw, a new sockpuppet, is making the same claims about robust evidence without providing it, or taking one side to a dispute as the reliable source concerning the dispute. Finding the "true" aafm is probably not going to happen. I think the fact that
758:
Looked up the Federal Trademark for AAFM in the USA. AAFM is registered witht the USPTO number: Reg. Num. 3714562 and owned by the AAFM, LLC USA. As per the AAFM founding websites: The original and registered Federal copyrights are disclosed on the financialanalyst.org and financialcertified.com
4607:
Please have somebody with knowledge of the citations repair this article. If you revert it again, it basically becomes a 6 year old article that is packed with edits made by the kingbr AKA Brett King who was a former employee of AAFM caught making edits to this article so that the company name could
4548:
Please have somebody with knowledge of the citations repair this article. If you revert it again, it basically becomes a 6 year old article that is packed with edits made by the kingbr AKA Brett King who was a former employee of AAFM caught making edits to this article so that the company name could
3780:
Yeah, it's really strange that editors might expect sock puppets and banned editors returning when that's happened repeatedly in the past. That's clearly paranoid. Thinking that an editor in good standing with 5 years under their belt is some kind of sleeper agent for unknown forces lying in wait to
2112:
All of that covers the absurdities I find in the first two paragraphs. The rest is similarly absurd, IMO. If anything is filed with the Wikimedia Foundation, we'll hear about it. If anything shows up in reliable sources, we'll add it to the article. Until then, I intend to participate in this public
2053:
I tell you what: If someone from the Internal Revenue Service were to show up and identify himself or herself as a "Special Agent" and show you a badge, THEN you should be scared. That's when you should call someone like me. I deal with the Internal Revenue Service on behalf of taxpayers. The IRS is
1483:
All AAFM Certifications Require Accredited Program Exams and Courses. Any business school professor familiar with accreditation would know that ACBSP and AACSB education represents the top 10 percent of business schools globally. As per the public disclosures on the NASD FINRA and Wall Street Joural
770:
In sum, there is vast evidence from the AAFM ® {as shown on website} USA news or the Founding Board that the AAFM American Academy of Financial Management is taking steps to warn the public and the consumer about offshore cybercrime, fraud and/or phishing that may be coming from Dubai and China and
2991:
I don't care which of the two options actually describes you, because the end result is the same. As for myself being a COI/POV editor -- good luck in convincing anyone about that. I may not be well-loved on Knowledge, but I'm certainly well-known, and no one is going to take your claim seriously.
2331:
There you go with the red herrings and pseudo-legal threats again. No one has made an intelligible claim that there is anything to sue over. (What any of this has to do with my "credentials" or the "UN Charter" is anyone's guess.) I get that AAFM and various socks don't like some of the facts here.
2246:
First of all, you are not professional by putting something on my page and then claiming it is on the article's talk page. That professionalism shows why a naive institution about Knowledge would be forced to take legal action against Knowledge. Because of a few editors like you, the entire project
1546:
wording preferred by EconomicTiger misleads in precisely this direction, suggesting that the requirements mentions are prerequisites for admission to a program rather than prerequisites for getting to pay a fee. Is there another wording that does not imply this and does not mention the fee by name?
1540:
further disputes whether the fee is the only requirement for these designations beyond an applicant's previously completed coursework, but this was the main point of the two Wall Street Journal articles: AAFM simply charges for the right to use its designations without providing additional training
747:
Checked the Archive.org, and the original websites for AAFM are: www.financialcertified.com and www.financialanalyst.org The earliest AAFM USA websites have clear fraud and cybercrime warning alerts on their home pages about the websites www.aafm.org and aafm.com.hk as being imposter phishing and
4472:
To belabor the obvious, these kinds of designations have proliferated over the years, to the point of being comical -- not just in the field of finance but in many other fields as well. Someone who wants to retain an expert in a given field has to do a little digging or research to determine which
4450:
What confused me about the term "certified financial analyst" is that I did a google search on "certified financial analyst", and one of the first hits was "CFA Institute." But, upon closer inspection, I found that the "CFA" designation granted by the CFA Institute is actually "Chartered Financial
3125:
You know what? You are so entirely off base that it's even not worth my discussing anything with you either. Rest assured that you will not be allowed to add unsupported material to the article, so your mission will not be successful. I'll standby and await the block you so obviously feel that I
1438:
I just read the related WSJ article by Mary Pilon. The WSJ article reveals nothing about a special affiliation with CFA or CFP. However, I went to the AAFM website and it has links showing where the CFA and CFP recognize the AAFM credentials in writing for educational credit. Also, I went to the
1093:
True about Mary, but the expert, Zweig , obviously did not receive or read the legal documents that reject and disprove all of the bogus criticism It obvious that somebody wrote this article and just put Zweig's name on it..... Also of importance is that AAFM and its credentials were listed in
2312:
I don't want credentials from you. And Knowledge doesn't have any immunity over law suits; I don't think there is special US legislation or an UN Charter which covers Knowledge over its legal immunity. But the AGF of Knowledge Editors can protect the project over any threats. I have added Content
1966:
A lawsuit is something that can be created only by filing some official papers by a plaintiff in a court of law. And, for you to be brought in as a defendant in a lawsuit and be subject to the personal jurisdiction of the court, generally someone would have to show up and deliver certain official
1442:
Also, The AAFM Website and its Board of Standards only shows a few key people on the board (7 or so people) and the rest of the professors and industry leaders on the list are only designated as Honorary Facutly Award Winners. Does this mean that Pilon did not comprehend the differnce or did not
982:
published an article detailing the use of designations and credentials by financial advisors that discussed the AAFM extensively. The article also specifically referenced the AAFM policy regarding double accredited education from government recognized business schools The article noted that the
2640:
article which points to the AAFM's credentials being monitored by a higher authority, I'll be glad to allow the citation in the article, but since I searched the citation and did not find anything, I'm inclined to believe that this is yet another attempt by the AAFM to skew our article away from
1773:
The text said "fee" everywhere, then it changed to "initiation payment" in the controversial sentence.... We don't know who is paying which fees, people who pass examination might be paying also the "initiation payment". Also, it's a bit weasel-y to say "in some cases" (which implies exceptional
1446:
Also, I went to the WSJ search, and the WSJ has all of the AAFM credentials listed along with the Accredited Education and Exam Requirements. Therefore, I can not understand how WSJ can ignore accredited exams and courses that are disclosed on their very own websites. Appears to be journalistic
1215:
Why does RJC keep removing the list of non profits that offer education? Why does RJC keep removing the Law school alliance Why does RJC continue to remove the references from the Investopedia. Why cant RJC comprehend that a registered trademark with the US goverment is not just an application.
602:
recently posted a set of Youtube clips purporting to discuss the change in the AAFM's name to IAFM. I did not watch all 40 minutes of the clips, but after 10 minutes it became clear that Brett King was being interviewed about the financial crisis, not about the organization. Moreover, a claim he
4710:
This article is so old and outdated, it is a complete list of incorrect facts. Please update if you can with some relevant facts. This entire article is based on the fraudulent facts added by terminated employees and competitors who were sued in US federal court and admitted to hot owning any
3237:
Previous versions of the article touted that AAFM was listed by FINRA, and that was removed. This seems to be the same content presented a different way. Also, given EconomicTiger's well-established mendacity, he cannot expect that we engage him in a long discussion that terminates only when he
2285:
Doctorlaw/Globalprofessor/Financiallawyer/Asianlawyer and all the rest of the socks have used broken English to make legal threats in defending their whitewashing of AAFM. Now EconomicTiger narrowly avoids making legal threats by implying he is a lawyer for others who "want to take legal action
2268:
Just to correct a misapprehension, I never claimed there was a discsussion here. In fact, in the dialogue you moved here without my permission, I clearly wrote "here or on the article talk page", and in my comment on AN/I I clearly stated that there was no discussion on the article talk page.
1732:
My only experience with this institution has been through its Knowledge, the editing of which is the only interaction I have had with people affiliated with it. If you want to know why I look at every edit to this page suspiciously, take a gander at the talk page, its archives, and my talk page
4382:
financial analyst designation is sold by AAFM. Years ago, there was an article for each of AAFM's designations. Then they were listed here, with the articles redirecting here. Now we no longer list AAFM's entire product line in this article, since that would in essence be an advertisement, but
1865:
that I may have been "identified for libel and defamation and "removed from article under legal policies until the fraud dispute is settled." I think the editor is trying to say that the AAFM has accused us of libel and defamation (though I am unaware of any claim that I have been malicious or
999:
certificate programs, respectively, was strangely rebutted by representatives of both the CFA and CFP organizations in the article; however, the AAFM Board's websites freely show the documents online and the contracts and consent agreements for the public to see on the AAFM website while fully
4026:
On July 17th, 2013, a US Federal Judge ordered that all of the of seven lawsuit counterclaims by AAFM and Mentz could go forward to court against the former trainers: Brett King, Geoff Baring and the IABFM. The US Court order stated that AAFM and Mr. George Mentz could sue Mr. Brett King, Mr.
3722:
Beyond My Ken is editing in good faith and a single purpose editor is joining a long list of socks associated with the organization aiming to polish their image contrary to our policies and the established consensus. This option also explains the actions of numerous other editors with similar
2251:
needs Administrative Action, not the Dispute Resolution Initiative. If an experienced Knowledge Editor like me could get frustrated, why the concerned institution won't go for a legal action against Knowledge? AAFM is not the first institution, there are number of individuals and institutions
1450:
Anyway, the AAFM is just a small American and US based board of standards. It has only been around for 10-15 years, and I am Not sure why anybody even cares about the AAFM or its accredited law school graduate law program. AAFM are just small players, when CFA and CFP are 100 million dollar
762:
Overall, it only takes a small child to surf and discover real AAFM websites in Asia and the Middle East that are backed by the government. Thus, it seems that there are authentic AAFM organizations in China and Asia and the Middle East: www.aafmchina.com www.aafmasia.com and www.aabfs.org
754:
Based on first impression, it appears that offshore offenders are attempting to Phish for money from innocent victims using stolen or converted domain. It looks like aafm.org and aafm.com.hk are based somewhere in Dubai or China and stangely claim to be formerly the AAFM USA company. The
3288:
Here there is meaningless or deceptive is not a issue, but it is mentioned at FINTRA's website and The Wall Street Journal carried this in their newspaper. When you want some Criticism of this Academy you can use The Wall Street Journal as a source and you can refer in the lead para as "The
3262:
Yes, they are monitored by FINRA. This is true, but meaningless and deceptive. Basically, it means they exist and fall under FINRA's umbrella. If they sold frozen vegetables, we wouldn't mention that they are monitored by the USDA as this would also be true, but meaningless and deceptive. -
713:
Being familiar with RIA licensing, law and exams, Kingbr needs to do some more research on US law regarding Rule 2210 before creating stories. The disclosure of this 2210 rule still appeares and is disclosed on the AAFM websites. Rule 2210, for example, would prohibit/prevent a training
4737:
You are a GAFM-related single purpose account with a serious conflict of interest, and you will not be allowed to turn this article into an advertisement for George Mentz's latest scam for conferring worthless "professional certifications" for money. Your edits will be deleted on sight.
1971:
on behalf of the plaintiff who filed the lawsuit. To do that, the plaintiff would have to know who you are and (probably) where you work or live, or would have to somehow find you somewhere. As noted elsewhere of course, even threatening legal action is a violation of Knowledge's rules.
4834:
The only place I can find a relevant statement "The GAFM ® Board of Standards is a founding member of the quality assurance standards memorandum of the CHEA International Quality Group" is on GAFM-related websites. There are no other Ghits - so the reliable source needed had better be
816:
there is absolutely no coverage of the aafm-iafm controversy argues against this organization's notability, but at the very least it means we lack reliable sources to change information. I relented in this latest website change because the old website no longer claims to be the aafm.
2012:
Yes, that's just someone's web site -- apparently for the "American Academy of Financial Management," or George Mentz or both. My point is that what you are seeing on that web site is not a lawsuit. The material is not even close to resembling papers that would be filed in a lawsuit.
2968:
If someone check my Contributions they will come know before I edit AAFM I have contributed many articles on Knowledge. If you feel I am an Agent of AAFM, you report at ANI. You seem to me with your previous 3RR blocks(and with the 3RR violations here), you are more a stubborn POV
2987:
There are only two logical options here. The first is that you are one in a long line of AAFM-related sock or meatpuppets editing on behalf of that organization. The other is that you are an ignorant patsy, editing in their favor without being cognizant of exactly what you are
3718:
Beyond My Ken created an account and spent 5 years making over 100,000 edits, waiting for the opportunity to sabotage the AAFM article. Ever the patient sleeper agent, BMK waits until 2012 to edit said target. BMK is using mind control technology to get other editors to follow
738:
After a review of the earliest/original AAFM WIKI article and the www.archive.org ,it is obvious that www.financialanalyst.org or www.financialcertified.com is the primary domian used in the earliest posts and revisions by the AAFM American Academy of Financial Management :
2660:
It is because you a few editors interpret my edits are whitewash that doesn't mean it is universally accepted norm. You should prove it clearly. You a few have taken me that I am sock of some one but finally failed at CU. I edit Knowledge when I want only and Not addicted to
4152:
astutely noted, "This is true, but meaningless and deceptive. Basically, it means they exist and fall under FINRA's umbrella. If they sold frozen vegetables, we wouldn't mention that they are monitored by the USDA as this would also be true, but meaningless and deceptive."
272: 691:
www.americanacademyoffinancialmanagement.com - www.financialcertified.com - www.aafmla.org - www.aafmtw.com - www.aafm.com.br - www.academyoffinancialmanagement.com - www.aafm.me - www.certifiedwealthmanager.com - www.charteredwealthmanager.com - www.aafmafrica.com
603:
makes on the air differs from a news agency's reporting on that claim. A statement he makes (which I have yet to find) in an interview that was not checked by the news agency should be treated as self-published, and as Mr. King has a vested interest in this matter
690:
Here is a Sample list of AAFM global websites below. "NO NAME CHANGES ON ANY OF THESE" www.aafm.us - www.financialanalyst.org - www.aafmasia.com - www.aafmchina.com - www.aafmindia.com - www.aafmglobal.com - www.aafmgcc.com - www.aapm.info - www.eafm.org
709:
Anyway, it seems that Kingbr still wants the wiki to make or allow unauthorized changes of the legal name of a real & existing US company. It would be nice if Kingbr could create something new, restrain from vandalism, and leave existing Wiki pages alone.
566: 3714:
Beyond My Ken created an account and has since been compromised by those wishing to harm the AAFM. Maybe they are holding BMK's beloved beagle hostage, threatening to harm it if BMK does not do their nefarious bidding. They are also holding other editors'
2391:
Drimies, Really glad you can take a look at RJC and the other ad lib edits. This article for AAFM has been spammed for 5 years, and now even the editors such as RJS and BMK refuse to allow edits of substance for 5 years. If you compare the article to
702:
After 2 minutes of searching, Relevant Information about KingBR dismissal and banning can easily be found on several of the AAFM websites: It does not take a rocket scientist to find out about this former disgruntled associate and make a correlation.
1155:
If we can't include the facts, Please delete the AAFM article all togther because the AAFM and CWM and other AAFM credentials are included in the Definitive work 'Investopedia" which is the premier and neutral finance and investment encyclopedia.
4805:
Please provide citations from reliable sources both as to the recognition of GAFM/IBS by CHEA, and that CHEA is a recognized, reliable, independent, organization whose recognition is worth noting. Both are necessary before this edit can be made.
3366:
And, as usual, we are not going to allow the AAFM to control the content of this article. For this reason I have removed your edits, and I, and other editors, will continue to do the same for any future whitewashing you attempt. This article is
1094:
the Forbes & Investopedia Dictionary for years and if Zweig worked for Forbes or knows FINRA, he would have at least seen it or searched it. Further, the FINRA governmental body has listed the requirements for AAFM Certifications for years.
1635:
if you'd like to read the formal definition of what "vandalism" means on Knowledge. Just because you're in a content dispute with another editor, and you disagree with their view, doesn't mean that their reversion of your edit is vandalism.
3682:
Your long time presence doesn't validate why can't you be a POV pusher or why you can't be influenced by King and Baring subsequently. I have seen number of Administrators on Rfc against them vanished once and for all. Also AAFM article was
153: 4355:
OK, now I'm confused -- the CFA Institute grants the designation "Chartered Financial Analyst," for which the abbreviation is "CFA." So, I'm not sure about who if anyone grants the designation "Certified Financial Analyst." Stay tuned.
1599:
So the article is explicit that there is no exam, that the requirement for getting the designation is a certain amount of previous education, and that for professionals even that requirement can be waived -- so the only thing that AAFM
944:
Those credentials include those that are tracked in a database kept by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and others that are less well-documented. Some are even defunct, but may still show up in advisers' marketing materials.
759:
websites: Registration Number: TXu 1-602-366 - The American Academy of Financial Management AAFM Handbook and Web Content © are Federally Copyrighted Materials with the US Library of Congress. Registration Number: TXu 1-602-366
1439:
AAFM website and they disclose documents signed by the Legal Counsel of CFA and CFP available to the public. Thus, I am not sure who is lying here? Did Pilon make up all of this stuff? Is this WSJ article simply phony journalism?
2096:"Collusion"? Personally, I have not agreed with anyone to hide anything or cheat anyone. If Mentz and/or AAFM would like to claim otherwise, I would consider that to be a problematical claim, of the sort being made here against me. 766:
The research quickly made it apparent that this small band of thugs such as Kingbr and his alias name Muhammad in Dubai and China are seasoned con artists who think they are above the law by phishing with websites such as aafm.org
3654:. That's rather unofficial, I'm sure no admin will admit to it, but it's nonetheless the fact of the matter - numerous editors will see to it that your edits to this article will never see more than a momentary publication. You 2629:
On the other hand User:EconomicTiger is one of the accounts that have attempted in the past to whitewash this article, which raises serious questions about their independence from the AAFM. If he or she is able to point to a
2408:
With so much good AAFM press, it makes you wonder about why the article is now so negative. Overall, it looks like editors are being paid to spam the article. Even the criticism has been debunked completely with evidence
576: 4668:
The above editor is obviously yet another whose purpose is clearly to skew the article in favor of AAFM. They come, and they go (they may even be the same person) but they all do the same thing. I've deleted their edits
3623:
two previous directors, King and Baring, who took the founder of the AAFM, George Mentz, to court for libel, slander and defamation after he made numerous claims publicly on various websites about them and their business
3289:
mainstream media criticized..."; but when something favourable to this Academy appear in the same newspaper, you cry that it is meaningless and deceptive. FINTRA is not listing each and every other designations but a few.
1347:
the article's content; AAFM was not "recognized" by WSJ in any idiomatic sense of the word. If you want more explanation, look at the edit summaries from when I removed this puffery the first time around, a year ago.
2286:
against Knowledge" in similarly broken English. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, smells like a duck and is an enclosure at the zoo with a big sign that says "Duck", it's probably a
845:
AAFM Accredited Law School program which has been public for several years. This long article in present form is very inclusive and hope non-biased parties can expand the links, factual content, and citations.
795: 694:
A quick analysis on www.archive.org shows that AAFM sites such as: www.financialcertified.com is much older and have been online for many years before any other offshore website or operation. Simple Research:
2404:, it was a useful and well cited article. Now, the article looks like it was written by a former disgruntled employee at the post office. Here is what the AAFM releases for press and media: See AAFM Press 743:
The offshore Arab Emirate domains such as aafm.org are labeled as fraud Phishing websites on the internet. It seems that the people offshore in Asia/Arabia are still attempting to make phony claims as above.
3397:
If you continue to over power that AAFM control this article without addressing the issue raised, I will have to report each and every other ArbCom members to have a look on what is happening to this article.
1443:
understand the astericks? next to peoples names The WIKI Article comments about people not giving their permission does not make any sense because these people are NOT Listed as being on the actual board.
1418:
Refused Deletion by RJC 2nd December - OK fair enough its probably better to have the expose of AAFM by the WSJ. As regards relationship with AAFM i am simply someone who was stupid enough to get ripped off
1835:
I believe the reason there appears not to have been discussion about the latest round of edits is because this point has been rehashed time and time again. See discussions with the various incarnations of
988: 44: 1596:
can be waived for anyone with sufficient professional experience who is willing to make "certification, registration and initiation payments," typically $ 300 or more. There is no exam to become an MFP.
918:
article that discusses the AAFM (among others) be presented in the article (i.e., should there be a separate criticism section, or should it be mentioned as listing the designations the AAFM offers)?
4262:
Now blocked indefinitely. I don't know what they were doing here (their musings are too incomprehensible to me), but they sure as hell weren't here to improve our beautiful project. Thank you all,
2183:
I haven't removed the critics completely, but I tried to balance the content with Reliable Sources. But it seems by reverting the cited content you are in COI with the institution or its founder.
147: 2093:
It says the AAFM has "initiated a legal and ethical complaint". Yes, with Mentz Law Firm. Mentz complained to Mentz. What law? It doesn't say. Ethics? Of what professional body? There isn't one.
2105:
a conflict of interest. There is no way to "commit" a conflict of interest. (Mentz needs someone to proofread.) Mentz, for example, would have a clear conflict of interest editing this article.
686:
All of the AAFM American Academy Board USA websites that were quickly found using web search are still live and operating as AAFM, and AAFM is easily found on US government websites such as:
4938:
I did think of that, but the IP has essentially no edit history. Doctorlaw, the master behind Spiritnoodle, used VPNs or proxies to hide their location, so there's really nothing to go on.
3766:
I expect the response from BMK not from you? There is no such consensus here. Only a few of you join together and criticizing each and every other account and IP address as somebody's sock.
4700:
Dear Editors, Please remove all negative advertisements from the people who lost the lawsuit. This article is defamatory as it stands according to a US Federal Court Lawsuit settlement.
4391:, since that would bolster the misimpression that the AAFM grants a designation that people care aobut. I would recommend tracking down and deleting the lot of those articles for failing 4240:
I've deleted all edits by Smoothpanda that haven't already been deleted. Any editor-in-good-standing who wants to vouch for any of them is free to restore it without any hassle from me.
4984: 942:
has been distorted and misused. It's not a positive article making an endorsment of the credentials listed. It's a derisive article using a derisive name ("Alphabet soup") and it says "
415: 405: 2683:
There is third column which says, "Issuing Organization"; once you scroll down the way there you will find, "American Academy of Financial Management" is mentioned in number of places.
190: 4302:
That appears to have been a huge mistake. The "Certified Financial Analyst" designation has nothing to do with the "American Academy of Financial Management," as far as I can tell.
4989: 4979: 2083: 2075:
the AAFM. A quick Google search for the law firm turns up only take down demands filed on behalf of AAFM on websites where people are claiming they were riped off by the AAFM.
4681:, uninvolved, non-conflicted editor wishes to change back certain parts of the edits I removed, it's fine by me, as long as the information is sourced with a citation from a 2109:
what I see. That's the "defamation" bit. "Fraud"? That would require deception for financial gain. If I'm gaining anything from this, the checks haven't come in the mail yet.
2113:
exercise. As there is nothing to add to the article here (so far) I'll continue to remove unsourced claims, add reliable sources as I find them and block socks as needed. -
4094:
It denied a motion to dismiss counterclaims, which is not the same thing. The suit was later dismissed, with prejudice, as the parties settled out of court. All the best:
1574:
on Knowledge articles. You are trying to interpret from Wall Street Article your own point and adding fee in each and every other sentences. That is in my point vandalism.
381: 3644:
The problem with your fallacious argument is that I am a long-time Knowledge editor, with a track record of thousands of edits to hundreds of articles, whereas you are a
699:
After gathering info at the AAFM USA websites, A quick check of the Secretary of State websites shows that the AAFM is still registerd and has never changed its name....
755:
WHOIS.com information about the aafm.org website shows that is squatted upon by mjehanzeb/Muhammed Jehanzeb and Mr. Brett King who may be in the United Arab Emirates.
4921:, who as you saw has been trying to push GAFM-related material onto this article. I have not checked the edit history, but are you able to confirm if this is the case? 4581:
Not sure if that's a TOS violation or not, but the job ad seemed like the former employees who were sued in court and lost, are trying to mess this article up again.
3126:
observe.... but I won't be holding my breath, just going about my business. (Which, in my case-- unlike yours -- is improving Knowledge). Have a really fabulous day.
1809: 2861:"Please point out where the American Academy of Financial Management in mentioned anywhere in the cited article. I've looked several times and I cannot find it....." 4451:
Analyst," not "Certified Financial Analyst." Also, I saw nothing on "certified financial analyst" on the AAFM web site, but of course I may just have overlooked it.
3697:
but by tricking editing other articles as well. Though I am a SPA, I don't see, why I can't raise any serious issues which are fallacious or correct wrongful facts.
2938:
of admins for adjudication. The result, I predict, will be the indef blocking of EconomicTiger as an agent of AAFM - so, really, keep on doing what you're doing.
1986:
But it's not just someone's website, it's on the American Academy of Financial Management's website? and it's written by Mentz Law Firm, LLC - George Mentz, Esq.
322: 4182:
Food for thought: This article is semi-protected. To edit the article requires an auto-confirm (account must be four days old and have ten edits). Additionally,
4969: 3996:
A good point, finally. I've removed that section as nothing came out of the legal action and there were no independent sources attesting to its significance. --
2627:
Please point out where the American Academy of Financial Management in mentioned anywhere in the cited article. I've looked several times and I cannot find it.
1840:, permanently banned from editing Knowledge for abusing multiple accounts. Wealthadvise is pursuing the same edits. If I had the time, I'd ask for a checkuser. 1212:
This article is just a blog and spam and RJC keeps removing the links from the US government, FINRA, Department of Labor and other citations from a law school.
1104: 312: 4685:. This is the kind of article in which sourcing is extremely necessary, as AAFM-connected people keep trying to turn it into an advertisement for their scam. 368: 345: 1003:
Some Editors Removed dozens of positive press articles to include one confusing and negligently written article by a recent college student named mary pilon.
4974: 4999: 4964: 2723: 2317:, which should be kept there. If I look like a "Duck", better browse my history since 2007, you will know my vast interests on Knowledge other than AAFM. 1900:
I was wondering why the socks of Doctorlaw were complaining of "diplomas" or "degrees", when the article only mentioned "certifications". Turns out that
1631:
I've restored the reverted information. Also, EconomicTiger, please do not refer to other editor's contributions as "vandalism" when they are not. See
524: 514: 79: 3978:
AAFM(India) is a subsidiary or affiliate of AAFM. If you question whether the certification is notable, can you show me independent sources to convince
2205:
against Knowledge editors includng myself. Please get your story straight, you can't whitewash the article in the organization's favor and then accuse
1911:
The WSJ article appear to use them interchangeably. The AAFM itself seems to mix designations and certifications all over their website, for example in
3111:
I am aware of that; but you are not. That is the reason, I have taken it to the Admin who is familiar with you rather than further discussing with you.
2863:. Then I went for the others opinion. Hyperionsteel has come out with his opinion above. Further Hyperionsteel clearly highlights in his Edit Summary, 2819:
Really? What fantasy world do you live in? I see no edit by Hyperionsteel to the article at all. Do you actually have any idea how Knowledge works?
168: 1866:
knowingly posted anything false...) and that the AAFM has demanded that I not edit the article as I would be "committing a conflict of interest" (?).
1494:
Here are the links that show AAFM Accreditation Articulation with the top 2 US Business School Accreditation Authorities. ACBSP Accrediation Alliance
1499: 135: 4226:
For 31 hours. They'll be back but as I said on their talk page, discussing here first and getting consensus is the only way they'll get anywhere. --
3979: 899: 288: 24: 5004: 4994: 2576: 2513: 2692:
Please bear in mind you have violated reverting "3" times and that clearly shows your COI with this page and qualifies you for an imminent block.
4884: 3881: 1390:
See, this is why I hate temporary semi-protection. At least the return of the morons reminds me to change the batteries in my smoke detector.
85: 3560: 3498: 3444: 3398: 3303:
It is trivial. Presenting it as a meaningful piece of information about your organization is distortion. Perhaps you could explain for us,
1223: 748:
cybercrime websites along with warnings about the webmaster Brett King who has somehow stolen websites according to the cybercrime alerts.
490: 3925: 3877: 129: 3983: 3929: 3885: 3767: 3698: 3627: 3352: 1519: 1163: 1010: 279: 256: 2985:
ET, that's complete and utter bullshit. I've got 140k+ edit to Knowledge, if I was a POV-pusher, it would have been uncovered long go.
914:? Do the citations in the longer version of the article support the statements to which they are attached? How should the October 14 4657: 4626: 4596: 4513: 653: 2099:
If we edit the article, we would be "committing a conflict of interest". If I were tied to AAFM or a competing organization, I might
125: 4791: 1467: 2336:
information about notable subjects. Those who wish to quash that information cannot do so with lame threats of laughable lawsuits.
3594:
will be examined, and it will undoubtedly be determined that you are simply the latest representatives of the AAFM, who have lost
1491:
Financial Advisor Acronyms Listed by Wall Street Journal showing FINRA monitored credentials and the education/exam requirements.
4704:
and see the retractions by the offenders and wiki editor who created the actual Wall Street Journal additions to this article.
4063: 2439: 3942:
That accreditation appears to be offered by only AAFM in India. Any independent sources to show the certification is notable? --
175: 2352: 882: 477: 438: 99: 30: 4701: 4609: 4550: 4124: 1940:
I made one revert of an IPs edit which added comments about legal action. I will not be making any more edits to this article.
665:
Could you provide the links to these articles? A Google News search, as you suggested I do on my talk page, turns up nothing.
4559:
This is just the judgement denying the motion to dismiss counterclaims; we had it from one of the AAFM socks in 2014, above.
1179: 104: 20: 4148:, attempting much the same as was talked about in the Monitored by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority section. As 2744:
Hyperionsteel: Very good work in your part on not being sucked into supporting this very-borderline credentials operation.
2552:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1076:, and has other credentials. All comments by this group of accounts seem to have this sort of distortions and omissions. -- 4059: 4043: 3338:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2435: 1541:
itself. So that is proof enough of AAFM's practices. I am open to alternate wordings, but given this article's history of
74: 3443:
But still that is a Single Source. And it is covered on the Criticism section, you don't need to repeat that on the lead.
2164:
Your edits appear to be an attempt to whitewash this article in the organization's favor. I suggest that you may have a
791:
Reading the AFD for this article, I notice that the ".us" domain is the one listed by the US bureau of labor statistics
231: 2252:
personally told me they want to take legal against Knowledge since my association with Knowledge which started in 2007.
4388: 4384: 4332: 4282: 2393: 2213:
And, BTW, going to AN/I immediately, without discussion here or on the article talk page -- not a really classy move.
996: 992: 141: 65: 4855:
I have e-mailed the contact address given on the CHEA International Quality Group's website, asking for information.
4642:
Not sure what Pinkbeast is talking about with AAFM got Eaten? What does that mean and why is that important to you?
3982:
which is on the article is notable? If you can't, why you haven't so far removed the section from the article space?
1905: 185: 1500:
http://web.archive.org/web/20071217181507/http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/enewsline/Vol-2/Issue-4/assoc-aafm.asp
1103:
The semi-protection has ended, and another IP has repeated yet again the same misleading edit. Is this related to
4404: 4099: 3247: 1849: 1742: 1558: 1399: 1356: 1250: 1195: 1134: 1045: 948: 927: 825: 674: 620: 552: 4311:
I deleted the redirect, and the article on "Certified Financial Analyst" can be expanded and cleaned up later.
199: 3564: 3502: 3448: 3402: 2715: 2671: 2583: 2533: 2464:
A company article sourced by the company's press releases to puff it up is never going to happen. Try finding
2142: 2069:"Mentz Law Firm, LLC - George Mentz, Esq." is the same George Mentz who founded AAFM. As far as I can tell, he 1331: 939: 4186:
accounts often start by editing their user page, to get rid of the red link in the article history. Now check
1957:
Dear Theroadislong: That's not a "lawsuit." That's just some postings by someone on his own internet web site.
1227: 741:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=American_Academy_of_Financial_Management&dir=prev&action=history
219: 4943: 4860: 4846: 4825: 4811: 4769: 4743: 4690: 4517: 4245: 4217: 3987: 3933: 3907: 3889: 3771: 3702: 3665: 3631: 3611: 3384: 3356: 3348: 3294: 3205: 3131: 3116: 3066: 3048: 2997: 2974: 2943: 2908: 2824: 2783: 2749: 2732: 2697: 2646: 2588: 2566: 2453: 2322: 2274: 2257: 2234: 2218: 2188: 2173: 2150: 2078:
The repeated additions to this article citing the threat of legal action have all been made by the numerous
2032: 1991: 1945: 1707: 1677: 1663: 1641: 1621: 1579: 1515: 1167: 1014: 109: 4795: 4790:
It should be notated that the successor - GAFM/IBS - is recognized by the CHEA International Quality Group
3035:
Since you are going out of the way accusing me unnecessarily for my content addition which is supported by
2674:) which I have sourced clearly says within brackets; "Rows in yellow indicate Finra-monitored credentials." 1549:
Incidentally, the reverted version takes out the name of one of the certifications, which I have restored.
1463: 4947: 4933: 4903: 4864: 4850: 4829: 4815: 4799: 4747: 4728: 4724: 4716: 4694: 4661: 4653: 4630: 4622: 4600: 4592: 4568: 4541: 4521: 4482: 4410: 4365: 4344: 4320: 4294: 4271: 4249: 4235: 4221: 4207: 4177: 4162: 4089: 4005: 3991: 3957: 3937: 3911: 3893: 3856: 3816: 3775: 3745: 3706: 3669: 3635: 3615: 3568: 3526: 3506: 3472: 3452: 3426: 3406: 3388: 3360: 3324: 3298: 3280: 3253: 3209: 3135: 3120: 3070: 3058: 3052: 3001: 2978: 2947: 2912: 2828: 2787: 2753: 2737: 2701: 2650: 2570: 2540: 2487: 2457: 2422: 2356: 2326: 2307: 2278: 2261: 2222: 2192: 2177: 2154: 2130: 2063: 2036: 2022: 1995: 1981: 1949: 1927: 1890: 1855: 1829: 1783: 1748: 1711: 1681: 1667: 1645: 1625: 1583: 1564: 1471: 1428: 1405: 1381: 1362: 1277: 1231: 1201: 1171: 1140: 1116: 1085: 1051: 1018: 964: 933: 886: 855: 831: 806: 783: 726: 717: 649: 634: 489:
topics on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
4022:
Federal Court Order Approving AAFM Lawsuit to go Against Brett King and Geoff Baring in US Federal Court
1923: 1779: 1511: 1377: 1112: 1081: 960: 802: 237: 4055: 4039: 1186:. Not policies or guidelines, admittedly, but by far the most accurate description of these arguments. 1060:
Mary Pilon might be or might not be a "recent college student", but that WSJ article is co-authored by
645: 630: 1459: 975:
General note: WSJ Not adhering to neutral point of view - There are 3 Key Articles covering the AAFM
4645: 4614: 4584: 4509: 4392: 4096: 4071: 4031: 2340: 1918:
Is there any legal difference between "professional designation" and "professional certification"? --
1507: 1455: 1219: 1159: 1006: 870: 851: 779: 722: 641: 545: 203: 4564: 4537: 4203: 4173: 3812: 3789: 3741: 3622: 3320: 3304: 3276: 3040: 2526: 2402:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=American_Academy_of_Financial_Management&oldid=264251240
2348: 2303: 2126: 1886: 1825: 1632: 1420: 1266: 979: 915: 878: 161: 55: 2714:
I was asked to look at this issue on my talk page so I figured I'd take a look. I've reviewed the
2427: 2414: 380:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
287:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
4939: 4910: 4887:
that support the change you want to be made. It looks like this might turn into a case of adding
4856: 4842: 4821: 4807: 4739: 4686: 4478: 4361: 4340: 4316: 4241: 4213: 3903: 3661: 3607: 3380: 3290: 3201: 3127: 3112: 3062: 3044: 2993: 2970: 2939: 2904: 2820: 2779: 2745: 2728: 2693: 2642: 2562: 2522: 2449: 2318: 2270: 2253: 2214: 2184: 2169: 2146: 2059: 2028: 2018: 1987: 1977: 1941: 1703: 1673: 1659: 1637: 1617: 1575: 1537: 1424: 599: 486: 204: 70: 3184:
I think you are ridiculous with your comment above. The content which I have added is supported
4929: 4899: 4731: 4720: 4712: 4649: 4618: 4588: 4529: 3784:
As for the consensus, when a few editors agree and are countered by a conflicted editor, that
2718:
article and it looks like the American Academy of Financial Management (AAFM) is cited as the
2605: 2431: 2418: 1808:
as part of an on-going dispute, previously reverted by more than one editor. The legal threat
1542: 1025: 903: 604: 51: 1488: 1290: 1095: 696: 4290: 4267: 4187: 2448:
What is the reason you created this account to make this comment? Are you a banned editor?
1919: 1775: 1373: 1108: 1077: 956: 798: 469: 201: 4702:
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00463/131596/48/
4610:
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00463/131596/48/
4551:
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/colorado/codce/1:2012cv00463/131596/48/
1608:
EconmicTiger, please stop reverting RJC's edits, they are by no stretch of the imagination
4086: 3954: 3853: 3523: 3469: 3423: 2618: 2484: 1369: 4168:
No surprise there. "ethical and legal" is right out of the Doctorlaw playbook, isn't it?
1869:
In any case, the editor (and his apparent socks) will obviously need to work through our
1702:
with this institution in real life. He is in dispute with two editors on what is agreed.
1148:
Review the evidence. This article without clarification is misleading and fraudulent.
4705: 1912: 4560: 4533: 4191: 4183: 4169: 4149: 3800: 3781:
block efforts to...ahem..."polish" some of AAFM's rough edges is clearly more rational.
3729: 3308: 3264: 3191:"the Alphabet Soup article does cite the Academy of Financial Management (AAFM) as the 2866:"the Alphabet Soup article does cite the Academy of Financial Management (AAFM) as the 2344: 2291: 2287: 2114: 2079: 1874: 1837: 1813: 1321:"AAFM Member Disclosure and Transparency Documents Submitted to the Wall Street Journal 1183: 1033: 1029: 874: 846: 774: 3860: 4958: 4474: 4357: 4336: 4312: 3645: 3559:
In that situation, even you can use the AAFM site; you don't need a secondary source.
2397: 2165: 2055: 2014: 1973: 1870: 1699: 984: 284: 4501: 749: 4922: 4892: 4888: 4682: 4506:
Not sure if that's a TOS violation or not, but the job ad seemed fishy on my end.
4429:
Dear RJC: Thanks, and I'm inclined to agree about the AAFM stuff not being notable.
4051: 4035: 3185: 3036: 2558: 2469: 2314: 2248: 1609: 1571: 797:(you have to search for "aafm"). Those same websites have no entries for "iafm". -- 608: 4638:
PinkBeast? Keep the fact that the AAFM got eaten; rv the usual silly axe-grinding
1904:
uses the name "professional designation", but wikipedia only uses the synonymous "
4126:
Colorado Federal Court Order Lawsuit against IABFM Brett King and Geoffrey Baring
1658:
I agree with you and made a final clean up and want to be away from this article.
4286: 4263: 2333: 2168:
in regard to the AAFM, and that you should no longer edit the article directly.
704: 453: 432: 271: 250: 4227: 4154: 4075: 3997: 3943: 3842: 3512: 3458: 3412: 2817:
Hyperionsteel doesn't need your Kudos; he has actually corrected your mistake.
2778:
Hyperionsteel doesn't need your Kudos; he has actually corrected your mistake.
2473: 459: 377: 792: 3606:
going to control this article, stalwart Knowledge editors will see to that.
2672:
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/st_CREDIT1015_20101015.html
1332:
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/st_CREDIT1015_20101015.html
656:) 11:12 am, July 29, 2009, Wednesday (1 year, 3 months, 10 days ago) (UTC−4) 555:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: 482: 3691:. 4 years gap is enough for a person methodically start a new account with 2202: 2141:
An AN/I complaint concerning this article has been filed. It can be found
1495: 3884:(SEBI). I don't think so, SEBI will work with an unrecognized institution. 3411:
The WSJ is a rock-solid source for the content you're trying to remove. --
680:
11:42 am, July 29, 2009, Wednesday (1 year, 3 months, 10 days ago) (UTC−4)
463: 360: 339: 4677:
has done previously (and as I have done in the past). As always, if any
4397: 3457:
The lede is a summary of the article, including the Criticism section. --
3240: 1842: 1735: 1551: 1392: 1349: 1188: 1127: 1038: 920: 818: 667: 626:
12:38 pm, July 28, 2009, Tuesday (1 year, 3 months, 11 days ago) (UTC−4)
613: 372:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to 1938: 1061: 373: 4473:
designations are really credentials and which designations are fluff.
687: 4917: 3648:
here only to represent your own interests in the AAFM, which is why
898:
To what extent are the various products and services offered by the
862:
Current Link to AAFM in the US Government Occupational Handbook is:
4146:
about letting the truth be heard in a way that is ethical and legal
2082:
of Asian lawyer/FinancialLawyer/Doctorlaw. The saga is outlined at
1915:
I can't tell which are certifications and which are designations.
1036:
seem relevant to the article. Read the results of the RfC above.
2859:
I think you are unaware of your own edits. You claimed initially,
1901: 1099:
that too? Strange ? AAFM should demand a retraction and apology
3878:
AAFM is working with the National Institute of Securities Markets
4674: 3728:
Please try to keep the paranoid conspiracy theories in check. -
2903:
Now, tell me, is it wrong to say, he has corrected your mistake?
1280:, "Wall Street Journal's and FINRA References, October 16, 2010. 2413:
Again, please find the right neutral folks to fix this article
2050:
I understand. But there's no substantial need to be concerned.
1278:"WSJ Reference Guide to AAFM Accredited Education Requirements" 4757: 1318: 1305: 540: 213: 205: 15: 1152:
party independent citations, then the WIKI is becoming joke.
1000:
disclosing the evidence provided to the Wall Street Journal.
2405: 3799:
don't hurt the beagles. They're innocent in all of this. -
3347:
The article is structured mostly based on the articles of
2410: 1489:
http://apps.finra.org/DataDirectory/1/prodesignations.aspx
1451:
operations that issue awards to people around the world.
1291:
http://apps.finra.org/DataDirectory/1/prodesignations.aspx
1096:
http://apps.finra.org/DataDirectory/1/prodesignations.aspx
697:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://financialcertified.com
4285:
redirects here, but is not explained in the article. --
3497:
Then either you should include the AAFM refusal as well.
3188:. Hyperionsteel clearly highlights in his Edit Summary, 4820:
I can find no mention of GAFM/IBS on the CHEA website.
4577:
Someone is offering money to vandalize this page again.
4212:
Smoothpanda's been blocked by the Good Doctor, Drmies.
4145: 3688: 3684: 3194: 3190: 2869: 2865: 2401: 1862: 1805: 1533: 911: 907: 740: 734:
Archive.org, Trademarks, Copyrights, and American Situs
3043:
who has blocked you initially for your 3 RR violation.
1334:"AAFM Requirements as shown in the Wall Street Journal 1208:
Wait, wait, I think I have it now. RJC is NPOV master.
160: 4706:
http://www.iabfm.org/iafm-press-release.php?year=2014
3621:
If I represent the AAFM, why you can't represent the
2084:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Doctorlaw/Archive
1913:
AAFM ® Professional Designations & Certifications
3660:
be aware of this. it's been the case for years now.
1479:
Certification and Exams from Accredited Institutions
481:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 283:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2233:The above dialogue moved, without permission, from 3588:I invite you to bring this issue to ArbCom, where 1293:"US Government Recognized FINRA Regulatory Agency 4502:https://www.upwork.com/jobs/_~016fe2492223f16c7e/ 2201:Sure, that's why the AAFM issued a press release 1125:One way to find out: permanent semi-protection. 750:http://www.financialcertified.com/fraudalert.html 4985:Low-importance Finance & Investment articles 1774:circumstances) when the source says "anyone". -- 947:" The same day they published an article called 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 4754:Semi-protected edit request on 1 September 2017 4528:This is of course the version being pushed by 3694:the intention of controlling an article solely 2054:scary for some people, for some reason...... 1672:Your adjustment to the text seems good to me. 1487:AAFM Global Exam requirements are listed here 894:Request for Comment on ARTSPAM and NPOV issues 390:Knowledge:WikiProject Finance & Investment 4990:WikiProject Finance & Investment articles 4980:Start-Class Finance & Investment articles 4497:Someone is offering money to "fix" this page. 3197:(i.e. the third column) for the acronym CAM)" 2872:(i.e. the third column) for the acronym CAM)" 2575:Some of its credentials are monitored by the 1873:unless and until the Foundation weighs in. - 1251:"Is Your Advisor Pumping Up His Credentials?" 1105:Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Doctorlaw 705:http://financialcertified.com/terminated.html 393:Template:WikiProject Finance & Investment 174: 8: 2247:is compromised. Removing content cited from 1528:Whether or not to include mention of the fee 4719:) 18:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)sprintnoodle-- 3651:you will not be allowed to edit the article 3039:, I brought this issue to the attention of 1896:"AAFM does not offer any diploma or degree" 1368:The latest edits also try to push a lot of 951:Is Your Adviser Pumping Up His Credentials? 217: 4643: 4612: 4582: 4507: 3305:the numerous editors who disagree with you 3238:declares himself convinced (i.e., never). 427: 334: 245: 3902:Citations from reliable sources, please. 3600:from the very beginning. Again, you are 3597:each and every examination of the article 4383:apparently the old articles remain. The 3307:, what makes this a significant fact. - 1496:http://www.acbsp.org/download.php?sid=10 1308:, "AAFM Press Release, October 16, 2010. 900:American Academy of Financial Management 25:American Academy of Financial Management 4387:article shouldn't redirect or refer to 4129:, Colorado United States District Court 4116: 2577:Financial Industry Regulatory Authority 2514:Financial Industry Regulatory Authority 1243: 866:Please do not use the outdated links. 611:. I have therefore reverted his edits. 429: 336: 247: 4335:doesn't capitalize the name properly. 3882:Securities and Exchange Board of India 2614: 2613:Italic or bold markup not allowed in: 2603: 2557:The following content is supported by 902:described in a manner consistent with 794:and by the US department of education 607:recommends against treating this as a 3880:, a public trust, established by the 3511:Reported in what secondary source? -- 1937:I have been named in a lawsuit here 1434:AAFM Wiki Article is Does not Add up? 7: 4970:Low-importance organization articles 2548:The following discussion is closed. 1447:negligence or just sheer ignorance? 475:This article is within the scope of 369:WikiProject Finance & Investment 366:This article is within the scope of 277:This article is within the scope of 3723:histories (and no beloved beagles). 2561:, if you differ, please state why?. 2027:It still scares the hell out of me! 1267:"AAFM Graduate Law School Program " 1178:Wait, wait, I think I have it now. 297:Knowledge:WikiProject Organizations 236:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 4975:WikiProject Organizations articles 688:http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos259.htm 300:Template:WikiProject Organizations 14: 5000:Low-importance education articles 4965:Start-Class organization articles 3711:Let's examine the possibilities: 3591:the entire history of the article 1064:, who has previously written for 595:Youtube interview and Name Change 396:Finance & Investment articles 4875: 4761: 3859: 3334:The discussion above is closed. 544: 462: 452: 431: 359: 338: 270: 249: 218: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1612:, they simply reflect what the 575:, 22 September 2008 (UTC), see 551:This article was nominated for 519:This article has been rated as 499:Knowledge:WikiProject Education 410:This article has been rated as 317:This article has been rated as 5005:WikiProject Education articles 4995:Start-Class education articles 4915:This IP might also be used by 2211:of being in cahoots with them. 1072:, and cnn.com, and edited for 502:Template:WikiProject Education 1: 4948:01:15, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 4934:01:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 4904:01:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 4865:00:50, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 4851:00:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 4830:00:37, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 4816:00:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC) 4800:23:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC) 4695:03:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC) 4662:13:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC) 4631:18:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC) 4569:00:11, 14 November 2016 (UTC) 4542:05:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC) 4483:14:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 4411:05:01, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 4366:21:01, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 4345:20:53, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 4321:20:53, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 4295:16:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 4272:17:20, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 4250:04:37, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 4236:04:36, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 4222:04:19, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 4144:We have a new editor, who is 3373:under your control, and will 2724:CAM - Chartered Asset Manager 2357:12:09, 21 January 2014‎ (UTC) 2332:Too bad. Knowledge publishes 1232:01:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC) 1202:03:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 1172:22:48, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 1141:00:58, 19 November 2010 (UTC) 1117:21:58, 18 November 2010 (UTC) 784:19:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC) 493:and see a list of open tasks. 384:and see a list of open tasks. 291:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 4601:23:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC) 4522:22:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC) 2488:23:39, 21 January 2014 (UTC) 2458:00:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 2423:23:28, 21 January 2014 (UTC) 2327:02:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC) 2308:01:51, 21 January 2014 (UTC) 2279:09:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC) 2262:01:11, 21 January 2014 (UTC) 2223:22:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC) 2193:21:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC) 2178:21:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC) 2155:22:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC) 1784:11:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC) 1472:00:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 1429:17:06, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 1363:23:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 1086:17:56, 7 November 2010 (UTC) 1052:09:32, 7 November 2010 (UTC) 1019:22:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC) 965:22:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC) 934:16:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC) 887:02:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 856:01:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC) 832:00:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 807:23:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 4784:to reactivate your request. 4772:has been answered. Set the 4748:20:25, 2 January 2017 (UTC) 4729:18:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC) 4389:chartered financial analyst 4385:certified financial analyst 4333:Certified financial analyst 4283:Certified financial analyst 4278:Certified financial analyst 4208:18:21, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 4178:18:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 4163:18:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 3928:can't be a reliable source? 2394:Certified Financial Planner 1319:http://www.aafm.us/wsj.html 997:Certified Financial Planner 993:Chartered Financial Analyst 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 5021: 4331:I notice that the article 4105:00:03, 20 July 2014 (UTC). 3325:16:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 3299:15:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 3281:15:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 3254:14:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 3210:13:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 3136:12:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 3121:12:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 3071:12:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 3053:12:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 3002:10:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 2979:09:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 2948:08:58, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 2913:11:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 2829:10:08, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 2788:09:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 2754:09:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 2738:07:48, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 2702:07:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 2651:07:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 2571:06:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 2541:17:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 1906:professional certification 1406:21:28, 20 April 2011 (UTC) 1382:08:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC) 727:20:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC) 525:project's importance scale 416:project's importance scale 323:project's importance scale 4006:19:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 3992:19:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 3958:14:36, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 3938:13:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 3857:18:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 3817:21:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 3776:19:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC) 3746:18:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 3707:13:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC) 2406:http://aafm.us/press.html 2131:16:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 2064:14:50, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 2037:14:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 2023:14:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 1996:14:35, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 1982:14:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 1950:09:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 1522:) 16:34, October 20, 2011 1306:"AAFM Public Disclosure " 518: 447: 409: 354: 316: 280:WikiProject Organizations 265: 244: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 4090:17:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3912:10:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3894:09:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3670:10:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3636:09:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3616:06:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3569:05:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3527:05:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3507:05:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3473:05:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3453:05:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3427:05:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3407:04:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3389:04:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3361:03:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC) 3336:Please do not modify it. 2550:Please do not modify it. 2203:threatening legal action 1928:13:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC) 1891:04:30, 1 June 2013 (UTC) 1856:02:59, 1 June 2013 (UTC) 1830:02:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC) 1749:15:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC) 1712:14:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC) 1682:20:48, 27 May 2012 (UTC) 1668:05:07, 27 May 2012 (UTC) 1646:03:37, 27 May 2012 (UTC) 1626:03:32, 27 May 2012 (UTC) 1584:07:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC) 1565:21:01, 25 May 2012 (UTC) 387:Finance & Investment 346:Finance & Investment 3349:The Wall Street Journal 2589:The Wall Street Journal 2411:http://aafm.us/wsj.html 2235:User talk:EconomicTiger 1812:at AN/I. Discussion? - 1698:It seems, RJC has some 1570:Please don't introduce 4046:) 17:12, June 9, 2014‎ 1598: 1182:governs here, as does 226:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 4064:few or no other edits 3687:and your account was 2440:few or no other edits 1606:requires is trhe fee. 1593: 1588:RJC is correct. The 978:In October 2010, the 565:, 24 March 2016, see 478:WikiProject Education 303:organization articles 100:Neutral point of view 4066:outside this topic. 3876:I checked, in India 3195:Issuing organization 2870:Issuing organization 2720:Issuing organization 2450:BMK: Grouchy Realist 2442:outside this topic. 2271:BMK: Grouchy Realist 2215:BMK: Grouchy Realist 2170:BMK: Grouchy Realist 2166:conflict of interest 2147:BMK: Grouchy Realist 1498:AACSB Press Release 1372:into the article. -- 1180:Vanispamcruftisement 105:No original research 3041:User:NuclearWarfare 2638:Wall Street Journal 1257:, October 16, 2010. 1255:Wall Street Journal 991:, which administer 980:Wall Street Journal 916:Wall Street Journal 4074:and your point? -- 2592:. October 16, 2010 2551: 2525:has been blocked. 2523:User:EconomicTiger 505:education articles 232:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 4788: 4787: 4664: 4648:comment added by 4633: 4617:comment added by 4603: 4587:comment added by 4524: 4512:comment added by 4106: 4067: 4048: 4034:comment added by 3061:? Probably not. 2549: 2512:Monitored by the 2443: 2360: 2343:comment added by 2237: 1810:has been reported 1524: 1510:comment added by 1475: 1458:comment added by 1295:AAFM Designations 1222:comment added by 1162:comment added by 1009:comment added by 890: 873:comment added by 840:Criticism section 658: 644:comment added by 589: 588: 585: 584: 539: 538: 535: 534: 531: 530: 487:education-related 426: 425: 422: 421: 333: 332: 329: 328: 212: 211: 66:Assume good faith 43: 5012: 4927: 4920: 4914: 4897: 4885:reliable sources 4879: 4878: 4779: 4775: 4765: 4764: 4758: 4407: 4400: 4232: 4200: 4197: 4194: 4159: 4140:Here we go again 4132: 4130: 4121: 4104: 4082: 4081: 4049: 4047: 4028: 4002: 3980:the legal action 3950: 3949: 3863: 3849: 3848: 3809: 3806: 3803: 3738: 3735: 3732: 3519: 3518: 3465: 3464: 3419: 3418: 3317: 3314: 3311: 3273: 3270: 3267: 3250: 3243: 2622: 2616: 2611: 2609: 2601: 2599: 2597: 2536: 2480: 2479: 2470:reliable sources 2425: 2359: 2337: 2300: 2297: 2294: 2232: 2123: 2120: 2117: 1883: 1880: 1877: 1852: 1845: 1822: 1819: 1816: 1804:I have reverted 1745: 1738: 1561: 1554: 1523: 1504: 1474: 1452: 1402: 1395: 1359: 1352: 1335: 1328: 1322: 1315: 1309: 1303: 1297: 1287: 1281: 1275: 1269: 1264: 1258: 1248: 1234: 1198: 1191: 1174: 1137: 1130: 1048: 1041: 1021: 930: 923: 889: 867: 859: 828: 821: 787: 730: 677: 670: 657: 638: 623: 616: 557: 556: 548: 541: 507: 506: 503: 500: 497: 472: 470:Education portal 467: 466: 456: 449: 448: 443: 435: 428: 398: 397: 394: 391: 388: 363: 356: 355: 350: 342: 335: 305: 304: 301: 298: 295: 274: 267: 266: 261: 253: 246: 229: 223: 222: 214: 206: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 5020: 5019: 5015: 5014: 5013: 5011: 5010: 5009: 4955: 4954: 4926:(Jalen D. Folf) 4925: 4916: 4908: 4896:(Jalen D. Folf) 4895: 4883:please provide 4876: 4777: 4773: 4762: 4756: 4683:reliable source 4640: 4579: 4499: 4409: 4405: 4398: 4280: 4230: 4198: 4195: 4192: 4157: 4142: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4123: 4122: 4118: 4079: 4077: 4029: 4024: 4000: 3947: 3945: 3846: 3844: 3841:Free Bailey! -- 3807: 3804: 3801: 3736: 3733: 3730: 3689:created in 2009 3685:created in 2005 3516: 3514: 3462: 3460: 3416: 3414: 3345: 3340: 3339: 3315: 3312: 3309: 3271: 3268: 3265: 3252: 3248: 3241: 3059:WP:BATTLEGROUND 2612: 2602: 2595: 2593: 2584:"Alphabet Soup" 2582: 2554: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2534: 2517: 2477: 2475: 2338: 2298: 2295: 2292: 2162: 2139: 2121: 2118: 2115: 1935: 1898: 1881: 1878: 1875: 1854: 1850: 1843: 1820: 1817: 1814: 1802: 1747: 1743: 1736: 1563: 1559: 1552: 1530: 1505: 1481: 1453: 1436: 1416: 1404: 1400: 1393: 1370:Marketing speak 1361: 1357: 1350: 1344: 1339: 1338: 1329: 1325: 1316: 1312: 1304: 1300: 1288: 1284: 1276: 1272: 1265: 1261: 1249: 1245: 1240: 1217: 1200: 1196: 1189: 1157: 1139: 1135: 1128: 1050: 1046: 1039: 1004: 973: 932: 928: 921: 896: 868: 849: 842: 830: 826: 819: 777: 736: 720: 718:FinancialLawyer 679: 675: 668: 639: 625: 621: 614: 609:reliable source 597: 504: 501: 498: 495: 494: 468: 461: 441: 395: 392: 389: 386: 385: 348: 302: 299: 296: 293: 292: 259: 230:on Knowledge's 227: 208: 207: 202: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 5018: 5016: 5008: 5007: 5002: 4997: 4992: 4987: 4982: 4977: 4972: 4967: 4957: 4956: 4953: 4952: 4951: 4950: 4906: 4873: 4872: 4871: 4870: 4869: 4868: 4867: 4786: 4785: 4766: 4755: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4698: 4697: 4639: 4636: 4635: 4634: 4578: 4575: 4574: 4573: 4572: 4571: 4554: 4553: 4545: 4544: 4498: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4490: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4461: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4431: 4430: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4403: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4323: 4306: 4305: 4304: 4303: 4279: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4180: 4141: 4138: 4134: 4133: 4115: 4114: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4107: 4092: 4072:Primary source 4023: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4008: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3897: 3896: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3793: 3782: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3720: 3716: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3639: 3638: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3561:61.245.160.221 3542: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3530: 3529: 3499:61.245.160.221 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3445:61.245.160.221 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3399:61.245.160.221 3392: 3391: 3344: 3341: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3260: 3259: 3246: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2655: 2654: 2555: 2546: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2516: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2196: 2195: 2161: 2158: 2138: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2110: 2106: 2097: 2094: 2091: 2087: 2076: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1934: 1931: 1897: 1894: 1861:Incidentally, 1859: 1858: 1848: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1741: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1616:article says. 1592:article says: 1557: 1529: 1526: 1480: 1477: 1435: 1432: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1398: 1385: 1384: 1355: 1343: 1340: 1337: 1336: 1323: 1310: 1298: 1282: 1270: 1259: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1236: 1224:98.196.144.184 1210: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1194: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1133: 1120: 1119: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1055: 1054: 1044: 972: 969: 968: 967: 926: 895: 892: 854:comment added 841: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 824: 810: 809: 782:comment added 735: 732: 725:comment added 684: 683: 682: 681: 673: 660: 659: 619: 596: 593: 591: 587: 586: 583: 582: 581: 580: 570: 549: 537: 536: 533: 532: 529: 528: 521:Low-importance 517: 511: 510: 508: 491:the discussion 474: 473: 457: 445: 444: 442:Low‑importance 436: 424: 423: 420: 419: 412:Low-importance 408: 402: 401: 399: 382:the discussion 364: 352: 351: 349:Low‑importance 343: 331: 330: 327: 326: 319:Low-importance 315: 309: 308: 306: 289:the discussion 275: 263: 262: 260:Low‑importance 254: 242: 241: 235: 224: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5017: 5006: 5003: 5001: 4998: 4996: 4993: 4991: 4988: 4986: 4983: 4981: 4978: 4976: 4973: 4971: 4968: 4966: 4963: 4962: 4960: 4949: 4945: 4941: 4940:Beyond My Ken 4937: 4936: 4935: 4931: 4924: 4919: 4912: 4911:Beyond My Ken 4907: 4905: 4901: 4894: 4890: 4886: 4882: 4874: 4866: 4862: 4858: 4857:Beyond My Ken 4854: 4853: 4852: 4848: 4844: 4843:Beyond My Ken 4840: 4839: 4833: 4832: 4831: 4827: 4823: 4822:Beyond My Ken 4819: 4818: 4817: 4813: 4809: 4808:Beyond My Ken 4804: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4797: 4793: 4783: 4780:parameter to 4771: 4767: 4760: 4759: 4753: 4749: 4745: 4741: 4740:Beyond My Ken 4736: 4735: 4734: 4733: 4730: 4726: 4722: 4718: 4714: 4708: 4707: 4703: 4696: 4692: 4688: 4687:Beyond My Ken 4684: 4680: 4676: 4672: 4667: 4666: 4665: 4663: 4659: 4655: 4651: 4647: 4637: 4632: 4628: 4624: 4620: 4616: 4611: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4602: 4598: 4594: 4590: 4586: 4576: 4570: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4552: 4547: 4546: 4543: 4539: 4535: 4531: 4527: 4526: 4525: 4523: 4519: 4515: 4511: 4504: 4503: 4496: 4484: 4480: 4476: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4468: 4467: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4463: 4462: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4428: 4427: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4412: 4408: 4402: 4401: 4394: 4393:WP:notability 4390: 4386: 4381: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4372: 4367: 4363: 4359: 4354: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4346: 4342: 4338: 4334: 4330: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4322: 4318: 4314: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4292: 4288: 4284: 4277: 4273: 4269: 4265: 4261: 4260: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4234: 4233: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4219: 4215: 4211: 4210: 4209: 4205: 4201: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4179: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4161: 4160: 4151: 4147: 4139: 4128: 4127: 4120: 4117: 4113: 4102: 4101: 4098: 4093: 4091: 4088: 4087: 4084: 4083: 4073: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4033: 4021: 4007: 4004: 4003: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3989: 3985: 3984:61.245.163.11 3981: 3977: 3976: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3959: 3956: 3955: 3952: 3951: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3935: 3931: 3930:61.245.163.44 3927: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3913: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3886:61.245.163.56 3883: 3879: 3875: 3874: 3862: 3858: 3855: 3854: 3851: 3850: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3818: 3814: 3810: 3798: 3794: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3773: 3769: 3768:61.245.163.11 3765: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3727: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3712: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3704: 3700: 3699:61.245.163.44 3696: 3695: 3690: 3686: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3658: 3653: 3652: 3647: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3637: 3633: 3629: 3628:61.245.163.56 3625: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3604: 3599: 3598: 3593: 3592: 3570: 3566: 3562: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3528: 3525: 3524: 3521: 3520: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3474: 3471: 3470: 3467: 3466: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3428: 3425: 3424: 3421: 3420: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3377: 3372: 3371: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3353:61.245.165.21 3350: 3343:Single Source 3342: 3337: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3306: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3291:EconomicTiger 3287: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3251: 3245: 3244: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3202:EconomicTiger 3199: 3198: 3193: 3192: 3187: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3113:EconomicTiger 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3072: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3045:EconomicTiger 3042: 3038: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3004: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2989: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2971:EconomicTiger 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2949: 2945: 2941: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2905:EconomicTiger 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2874: 2873: 2868: 2867: 2862: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2780:EconomicTiger 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2736: 2734: 2730: 2729:Hyperionsteel 2725: 2721: 2717: 2716:Alphabet Soup 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2694:EconomicTiger 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2673: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2653: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2639: 2635: 2634: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623:</ref: --> 2620: 2607: 2591: 2590: 2585: 2580: 2578: 2573: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2563:EconomicTiger 2560: 2553: 2542: 2539: 2537: 2530: 2529: 2524: 2515: 2511: 2489: 2486: 2485: 2482: 2481: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2429: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2412: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2398:CFA Institute 2395: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2335: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2324: 2320: 2319:EconomicTiger 2316: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2289: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2254:EconomicTiger 2250: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2236: 2225: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2210: 2209: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2185:EconomicTiger 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2159: 2157: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2111: 2107: 2104: 2103: 2098: 2095: 2092: 2088: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2074: 2073: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2051: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2029:Theroadislong 2026: 2025: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1988:Theroadislong 1985: 1984: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1970: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1942:Theroadislong 1939: 1933:Legal threats 1932: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1916: 1914: 1909: 1907: 1903: 1895: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1872: 1871:usual process 1867: 1864: 1857: 1853: 1847: 1846: 1839: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1811: 1807: 1799: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1750: 1746: 1740: 1739: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1704:EconomicTiger 1701: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1674:Beyond My Ken 1671: 1670: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1660:EconomicTiger 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1638:Beyond My Ken 1634: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1618:Beyond My Ken 1615: 1611: 1605: 1604: 1597: 1591: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1576:EconomicTiger 1573: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1562: 1556: 1555: 1547: 1544: 1539: 1538:EconomicTiger 1535: 1527: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1512:98.97.234.102 1509: 1502: 1501: 1497: 1492: 1490: 1485: 1478: 1476: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1433: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1413: 1407: 1403: 1397: 1396: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1360: 1354: 1353: 1341: 1333: 1327: 1324: 1320: 1314: 1311: 1307: 1302: 1299: 1296: 1292: 1286: 1283: 1279: 1274: 1271: 1268: 1263: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1247: 1244: 1237: 1235: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1213: 1207: 1206: 1203: 1199: 1193: 1192: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1164:209.218.8.166 1161: 1153: 1149: 1142: 1138: 1132: 1131: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1097: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1043: 1042: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1011:209.218.8.166 1008: 1001: 998: 994: 990: 986: 985:CFA Institute 981: 976: 970: 966: 962: 958: 954: 952: 946: 941: 938: 937: 936: 935: 931: 925: 924: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 893: 891: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 865: 860: 857: 853: 848: 839: 833: 829: 823: 822: 814: 813: 812: 811: 808: 804: 800: 796: 793: 790: 789: 788: 785: 781: 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 752: 751: 745: 742: 733: 731: 728: 724: 719: 715: 711: 707: 706: 700: 698: 692: 689: 678: 672: 671: 664: 663: 662: 661: 655: 651: 647: 643: 636: 632: 629: 628: 627: 624: 618: 617: 610: 606: 601: 594: 592: 578: 574: 571: 568: 564: 561: 560: 559: 558: 554: 550: 547: 543: 542: 526: 522: 516: 513: 512: 509: 492: 488: 484: 480: 479: 471: 465: 460: 458: 455: 451: 450: 446: 440: 437: 434: 430: 417: 413: 407: 404: 403: 400: 383: 379: 375: 371: 370: 365: 362: 358: 357: 353: 347: 344: 341: 337: 324: 320: 314: 311: 310: 307: 294:Organizations 290: 286: 285:Organizations 282: 281: 276: 273: 269: 268: 264: 258: 257:Organizations 255: 252: 248: 243: 239: 233: 225: 221: 216: 215: 196: 195: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 4918:Sprintnoodle 4880: 4837: 4836: 4789: 4781: 4770:edit request 4732:Sprintnoodle 4721:Sprintnoodle 4713:Sprintnoodle 4709: 4699: 4678: 4670: 4650:Sprintnoodle 4644:— Preceding 4641: 4619:Sprintnoodle 4613:— Preceding 4589:Sprintnoodle 4583:— Preceding 4580: 4530:Sprintnoodle 4514:72.83.216.62 4508:— Preceding 4505: 4500: 4396: 4379: 4281: 4228: 4190:'s edits. - 4155: 4143: 4125: 4119: 4111: 4095: 4085: 4076: 4030:— Preceding 4025: 3998: 3953: 3944: 3852: 3843: 3796: 3795:By the way, 3785: 3693: 3692: 3656: 3655: 3650: 3649: 3602: 3601: 3596: 3595: 3590: 3589: 3587: 3522: 3513: 3468: 3459: 3422: 3413: 3375: 3374: 3369: 3368: 3346: 3335: 3261: 3239: 3236: 3196: 3189: 3057:Heard about 2990: 2986: 2871: 2864: 2860: 2816: 2727: 2719: 2637: 2636:part of the 2632: 2631: 2628: 2594:. Retrieved 2587: 2581: 2574: 2556: 2547: 2531: 2527: 2483: 2474: 2468:third party 2465: 2339:— Preceding 2231: 2230: 2212: 2207: 2206: 2163: 2140: 2101: 2100: 2071: 2070: 2052: 2049: 1968: 1936: 1917: 1910: 1899: 1868: 1860: 1841: 1803: 1734: 1633:WP:VANDALISM 1613: 1607: 1602: 1601: 1594: 1589: 1550: 1548: 1531: 1506:— Preceding 1503: 1493: 1486: 1482: 1454:— Preceding 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1417: 1414:Deleted Prod 1391: 1348: 1345: 1342:Recent edits 1326: 1313: 1301: 1294: 1285: 1273: 1262: 1254: 1246: 1214: 1211: 1187: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1126: 1092: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1037: 1002: 977: 974: 950: 943: 940:The WSJ list 919: 908:this version 897: 861: 843: 817: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 746: 737: 716: 712: 708: 701: 693: 685: 666: 646:Asian lawyer 631:Asian lawyer 612: 598: 590: 572: 563:no consensus 562: 520: 476: 411: 367: 318: 278: 238:WikiProjects 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 4792:73.166.28.5 4188:Smoothpanda 4062:) has made 3624:activities. 2466:independent 2438:) has made 2137:AN/I Report 2080:sockpuppets 1920:Enric Naval 1776:Enric Naval 1460:Phdeditguru 1374:Enric Naval 1218:—Preceding 1158:—Preceding 1109:Enric Naval 1078:Enric Naval 1062:Jason Zweig 1005:—Preceding 957:Enric Naval 869:—Preceding 850:—Preceding 799:Enric Naval 778:—Preceding 721:—Preceding 640:—Preceding 228:Start-class 148:free images 31:not a forum 4959:Categories 4841:reliable. 4774:|answered= 4112:References 4100:Farmbrough 2670:The link ( 2334:verifiable 1733:archives. 1603:absolutely 1543:WP:ARTSPAM 1532:Regarding 1238:References 1026:WP:ARTSPAM 904:WP:ARTSPAM 605:WP:SELFPUB 577:discussion 567:discussion 378:Investment 4881:Not done: 4675:Pinkbeast 4561:Pinkbeast 4534:Pinkbeast 4380:certified 4170:Pinkbeast 4150:SummerPhD 3926:NISM site 3790:consensus 2596:March 31, 2345:SummerPhD 2313:based on 1838:Doctorlaw 1806:this edit 1534:this edit 989:CFP Board 971:Criticism 875:Doctorlaw 847:Doctorlaw 775:Doctorlaw 771:Kingbr. 496:Education 483:education 439:Education 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 4658:contribs 4646:unsigned 4627:contribs 4615:unsigned 4597:contribs 4585:unsigned 4510:unsigned 4475:Famspear 4406:Contribs 4358:Famspear 4337:Famspear 4313:Famspear 4060:contribs 4044:contribs 4032:unsigned 3715:beagles. 3249:Contribs 2633:specific 2606:cite web 2436:contribs 2353:contribs 2341:unsigned 2090:of Mars. 2056:Famspear 2015:Famspear 1974:Famspear 1851:Contribs 1744:Contribs 1560:Contribs 1520:contribs 1508:unsigned 1468:contribs 1456:unsigned 1421:Dickietr 1401:Contribs 1358:Contribs 1220:unsigned 1197:Contribs 1160:unsigned 1136:Contribs 1047:Contribs 1007:unsigned 987:and the 929:Contribs 912:this one 883:contribs 871:unsigned 827:Contribs 676:Contribs 654:contribs 642:unsigned 622:Contribs 553:deletion 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 4923:jd22292 4893:jd22292 4671:in toto 4052:IBLSLAW 4036:IBLSLAW 2969:pusher. 2428:Beyond8 2415:Beyond8 1967:papers 1800:Dispute 1184:WP:SOUP 1034:WP:SOCK 1032:, and 1030:WP:SPAM 852:undated 780:undated 723:undated 523:on the 414:on the 374:Finance 321:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 4287:Beland 4264:Drmies 3797:please 3646:WP:SPA 2988:doing. 2641:NPOV. 2615:|work= 1969:to you 1700:WP:COI 1074:Forbes 600:Kingbr 234:scale. 126:Google 4889:WP:OR 4838:ultra 4778:|ans= 4768:This 3719:suit. 3376:never 3186:WP:RS 3037:WP:RS 2559:WP:RS 2315:WP:RS 2249:WP:RS 1902:FINRA 1863:I see 1610:WP:OR 1572:WP:OR 1066:Money 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 4944:talk 4930:talk 4900:talk 4861:talk 4847:talk 4826:talk 4812:talk 4796:talk 4744:talk 4725:talk 4717:talk 4691:talk 4679:real 4654:talk 4623:talk 4593:talk 4565:talk 4538:talk 4518:talk 4479:talk 4378:The 4362:talk 4341:talk 4317:talk 4291:talk 4268:talk 4246:talk 4229:Neil 4218:talk 4204:talk 4184:sock 4174:talk 4156:Neil 4097:Rich 4078:Neil 4056:talk 4040:talk 3999:Neil 3988:talk 3946:Neil 3934:talk 3924:Why 3908:talk 3890:talk 3845:Neil 3813:talk 3772:talk 3742:talk 3703:talk 3666:talk 3657:must 3632:talk 3612:talk 3565:talk 3515:Neil 3503:talk 3461:Neil 3449:talk 3415:Neil 3403:talk 3385:talk 3379:be. 3357:talk 3321:talk 3295:talk 3277:talk 3206:talk 3132:talk 3117:talk 3067:talk 3049:talk 2998:talk 2975:talk 2944:talk 2909:talk 2825:talk 2784:talk 2750:talk 2733:talk 2698:talk 2647:talk 2619:help 2598:2014 2567:talk 2535:Talk 2476:Neil 2472:. -- 2454:talk 2432:talk 2419:talk 2349:talk 2323:talk 2304:talk 2288:duck 2275:talk 2258:talk 2219:talk 2189:talk 2174:talk 2160:AAFM 2151:talk 2143:here 2127:talk 2102:have 2060:talk 2033:talk 2019:talk 1992:talk 1978:talk 1946:talk 1924:talk 1887:talk 1826:talk 1780:talk 1708:talk 1678:talk 1664:talk 1642:talk 1622:talk 1580:talk 1516:talk 1464:talk 1425:talk 1378:talk 1228:talk 1168:talk 1113:talk 1107:? -- 1082:talk 1070:Time 1015:talk 995:and 961:talk 955:. -- 910:and 879:talk 803:talk 650:talk 635:talk 573:keep 485:and 376:and 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 4776:or 4673:as 4399:RJC 4242:BMK 4214:BMK 4199:PhD 4196:mer 4193:Sum 3904:BMK 3808:PhD 3805:mer 3802:Sum 3737:PhD 3734:mer 3731:Sum 3662:BMK 3608:BMK 3603:not 3381:BMK 3370:not 3316:PhD 3313:mer 3310:Sum 3272:PhD 3269:mer 3266:Sum 3242:RJC 3128:BMK 3063:BMK 2994:BMK 2940:BMK 2821:BMK 2746:BMK 2661:it. 2643:BMK 2396:or 2299:PhD 2296:mer 2293:Sum 2145:. 2122:PhD 2119:mer 2116:Sum 1908:". 1882:PhD 1879:mer 1876:Sum 1844:RJC 1821:PhD 1818:mer 1815:Sum 1737:RJC 1614:WSJ 1590:WSJ 1553:RJC 1394:RJC 1351:RJC 1190:RJC 1129:RJC 1040:RJC 922:RJC 906:in 820:RJC 669:RJC 615:RJC 515:Low 406:Low 313:Low 176:TWL 4961:: 4946:) 4932:) 4902:) 4891:. 4863:) 4849:) 4828:) 4814:) 4798:) 4782:no 4746:) 4727:) 4693:) 4660:) 4656:• 4629:) 4625:• 4599:) 4595:• 4567:) 4540:) 4532:. 4520:) 4481:) 4395:. 4364:) 4343:) 4319:) 4293:) 4270:) 4248:) 4220:) 4206:) 4176:) 4153:-- 4103:, 4058:• 4050:— 4042:• 3990:) 3936:) 3910:) 3892:) 3815:) 3788:a 3786:is 3774:) 3744:) 3705:) 3668:) 3634:) 3614:) 3567:) 3505:) 3451:) 3405:) 3387:) 3359:) 3323:) 3297:) 3279:) 3208:) 3134:) 3119:) 3069:) 3051:) 3000:) 2977:) 2946:) 2911:) 2827:) 2786:) 2752:) 2700:) 2649:) 2610:: 2608:}} 2604:{{ 2586:. 2579:. 2569:) 2528:NW 2456:) 2434:• 2426:— 2421:) 2355:) 2351:• 2325:) 2306:) 2277:) 2260:) 2221:) 2208:me 2191:) 2176:) 2153:) 2129:) 2072:is 2062:) 2035:) 2021:) 1994:) 1980:) 1948:) 1926:) 1889:) 1828:) 1782:) 1710:) 1680:) 1666:) 1644:) 1624:) 1582:) 1518:• 1470:) 1466:• 1427:) 1380:) 1253:, 1230:) 1170:) 1115:) 1084:) 1068:, 1028:, 1017:) 963:) 885:) 881:• 805:) 652:• 156:) 54:; 4942:( 4928:( 4913:: 4909:@ 4898:( 4859:( 4845:( 4824:( 4810:( 4794:( 4742:( 4723:( 4715:( 4689:( 4652:( 4621:( 4591:( 4563:( 4536:( 4516:( 4477:( 4360:( 4339:( 4315:( 4289:( 4266:( 4244:( 4231:N 4216:( 4202:( 4172:( 4158:N 4131:. 4080:N 4054:( 4038:( 4001:N 3986:( 3948:N 3932:( 3906:( 3888:( 3847:N 3811:( 3792:. 3770:( 3740:( 3701:( 3664:( 3630:( 3626:. 3610:( 3563:( 3517:N 3501:( 3463:N 3447:( 3417:N 3401:( 3383:( 3355:( 3351:. 3319:( 3293:( 3275:( 3204:( 3200:. 3130:( 3115:( 3065:( 3047:( 2996:( 2973:( 2942:( 2907:( 2823:( 2782:( 2748:( 2735:) 2731:( 2696:( 2645:( 2621:) 2617:( 2600:. 2565:( 2538:) 2532:( 2478:N 2452:( 2430:( 2417:( 2347:( 2321:( 2302:( 2273:( 2256:( 2217:( 2187:( 2172:( 2149:( 2125:( 2086:. 2058:( 2031:( 2017:( 1990:( 1976:( 1944:( 1922:( 1885:( 1824:( 1778:( 1706:( 1676:( 1662:( 1640:( 1620:( 1578:( 1514:( 1462:( 1423:( 1376:( 1330:[ 1317:[ 1289:[ 1226:( 1166:( 1111:( 1080:( 1013:( 959:( 953:" 949:" 877:( 858:. 801:( 786:. 729:. 648:( 633:( 579:. 569:. 527:. 418:. 325:. 240:: 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
American Academy of Financial Management
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Organizations

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.