Knowledge

Talk:Analytic geometry

Source 📝

521:(Deleting previous comment.) How silly of me. Of course, the metatheorem that Euclidean geometry = analytic geometry is proven somewhere in the course of Tarski's proof that Euclidean geometry is decidable. The key steps are to show that Tarski's axioms are interpretable in the theory of real closed fields and that there exists a decision-procedure for the latter via quantifier elimination. To clarify, Grobner bases provide more efficient algorithms for the second step. An immediate consequence is that elementary geometry is routine. 320: 310: 289: 256: 401: 216: 247: 699: 598:
I really can not see an advantage to having words on the tin that don't match what is in the tin. An article entitled "Analytic Geometry" should be about the modern subject of analytic geometry. A separate article entitled "Co-ordinate Geometry" should be about, well how about, co-ordinate
486:
It seems non-trivial. Euclidean geometry is consistent, yet the same cannot be said of arithmetic. Tarski's work comes to mind. So how do you quickly show that analytic geometry doesn't let you talk about the integers or rationals? Analytic geometry is routine and algorithmically decidable via
653:
Yes, it is missing negative signs. This illustration has been defective since Jan. 2015 and the creator of the diagram was aware of this as it is mentioned on the file page for this illustration. It probably should be removed.
575:
This article has Too little info on the modern and advanced meaning. Maybe this article should be renamed Analytic geometry(classical meaning) and a new article should be created Analytic geometry(modern and advanced meaning)
166: 619:
There is a lot of implicit mention of algebraic geometric concepts such as algebraic curves. To my knowledge analytic geometry is simply the study of coordinate systems. Perhaps this should be fixed.
376: 639: 763: 711: 472:
I've changed it to what I assume it meant. A mildly interesting point for our wonkish bretheren: can this metatheorem that everyone knows be given an accessible reference?
160: 207: 753: 638:
Am I missing something extremely obvious, or is the very first illustration in this article (the one captioned "Cartesian coordinates") missing some negative signs?
460:
The relationship between algebra and geometry is nontrivial. There exist proofs of this relationship based on the theory of geometry and notions of geometric length.
768: 260: 778: 366: 92: 748: 57: 758: 599:
geometry. Surely it would be obtuse to have it any other way, especially as this is an encyclopedia with an object of clarifying material.
342: 773: 98: 620: 583: 549: 707: 691: 333: 294: 643: 414: 203: 181: 743: 503: 112: 43: 148: 117: 33: 87: 269: 723: 444: 78: 215: 198: 142: 423: 226: 138: 624: 587: 553: 122: 719: 188: 703: 473: 275: 319: 714:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
604: 579: 545: 491: 246: 499: 174: 68: 341:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
677: 659: 463: 429: 325: 231: 83: 309: 288: 154: 64: 37: 425: 400: 228: 600: 522: 495: 737: 673: 655: 338: 315: 427: 230: 729: 681: 663: 647: 628: 608: 591: 557: 525: 507: 476: 466: 712:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 14#Analytisk geometri
698: 672:
It has now been replaced (not by me) with a correct illustration. --
702:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
430: 394: 240: 232: 28: 15: 173: 337:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 571:Too little info on the modern and advanced meaning 46:for general discussion of the article's subject. 764:Knowledge level-4 vital articles in Mathematics 542:The line is true but has nothing to do here. 438:This page has archives. Sections older than 187: 8: 489: 283: 455:Relationship between algebra and geometry 754:Knowledge vital articles in Mathematics 615:Analytic geometry vs Algebraic geometry 285: 244: 448:when more than 5 sections are present. 769:B-Class vital articles in Mathematics 7: 331:This article is within the scope of 640:2604:2000:EFC0:2:6101:CCF:CD4B:8D4E 274:It is of interest to the following 36:for discussing improvements to the 14: 779:Top-priority mathematics articles 442:may be automatically archived by 351:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 749:Knowledge level-4 vital articles 710:. This discussion will occur at 697: 399: 354:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 318: 308: 287: 254: 245: 214: 58:Click here to start a new topic. 690:"Analytisk geometri" listed at 371:This article has been rated as 759:B-Class level-4 vital articles 1: 730:06:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC) 592:00:56, 30 November 2011 (UTC) 558:00:57, 30 November 2011 (UTC) 345:and see a list of open tasks. 55:Put new text under old text. 774:B-Class mathematics articles 609:14:01, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 477:21:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 467:19:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC) 526:03:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 508:02:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 63:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 795: 629:12:10, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 682:17:27, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 664:03:31, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 648:23:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 370: 303: 282: 93:Be welcoming to newcomers 22:Skip to table of contents 692:Redirects for discussion 377:project's priority scale 21: 706:and has thus listed it 487:Grobner bases, I think. 334:WikiProject Mathematics 744:B-Class vital articles 720:User:1234qwer1234qwer4 462:What does this mean? 445:Lowercase sigmabot III 88:avoid personal attacks 261:level-4 vital article 208:Auto-archiving period 113:Neutral point of view 357:mathematics articles 118:No original research 704:Analytisk geometri 326:Mathematics portal 270:content assessment 99:dispute resolution 60: 582:comment added by 548:comment added by 510: 494:comment added by 452: 451: 391: 390: 387: 386: 383: 382: 239: 238: 79:Assume good faith 56: 38:Analytic geometry 27: 26: 786: 728: 727: 701: 674:Bill Cherowitzo 656:Bill Cherowitzo 594: 560: 474:Charles Matthews 447: 431: 403: 395: 359: 358: 355: 352: 349: 328: 323: 322: 312: 305: 304: 299: 291: 284: 267: 258: 257: 250: 249: 241: 233: 219: 218: 209: 192: 191: 177: 108:Article policies 29: 16: 794: 793: 789: 788: 787: 785: 784: 783: 734: 733: 718: 715: 695: 636: 617: 577: 573: 543: 457: 443: 432: 426: 408: 356: 353: 350: 347: 346: 324: 317: 297: 268:on Knowledge's 265: 255: 235: 234: 229: 206: 134: 129: 128: 127: 104: 74: 12: 11: 5: 792: 790: 782: 781: 776: 771: 766: 761: 756: 751: 746: 736: 735: 717: 708:for discussion 694: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 667: 666: 635: 634:Negative Signs 632: 616: 613: 612: 611: 572: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 528: 514: 513: 512: 511: 480: 479: 456: 453: 450: 449: 437: 434: 433: 428: 424: 422: 419: 418: 410: 409: 404: 398: 389: 388: 385: 384: 381: 380: 369: 363: 362: 360: 343:the discussion 330: 329: 313: 301: 300: 292: 280: 279: 273: 251: 237: 236: 227: 225: 224: 221: 220: 194: 193: 131: 130: 126: 125: 120: 115: 106: 105: 103: 102: 95: 90: 81: 75: 73: 72: 61: 52: 51: 48: 47: 41: 25: 24: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 791: 780: 777: 775: 772: 770: 767: 765: 762: 760: 757: 755: 752: 750: 747: 745: 742: 741: 739: 732: 731: 725: 721: 713: 709: 705: 700: 693: 689: 683: 679: 675: 671: 670: 669: 668: 665: 661: 657: 652: 651: 650: 649: 645: 641: 633: 631: 630: 626: 622: 621:67.252.103.23 614: 610: 606: 602: 597: 596: 595: 593: 589: 585: 584:220.255.2.141 581: 570: 559: 555: 551: 550:220.255.2.166 547: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 527: 524: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 509: 505: 501: 497: 493: 488: 484: 483: 482: 481: 478: 475: 471: 470: 469: 468: 465: 464:Richard Pinch 461: 454: 446: 441: 436: 435: 421: 420: 417: 416: 412: 411: 407: 402: 397: 396: 393: 378: 374: 368: 365: 364: 361: 344: 340: 336: 335: 327: 321: 316: 314: 311: 307: 306: 302: 296: 293: 290: 286: 281: 277: 271: 263: 262: 252: 248: 243: 242: 223: 222: 217: 213: 205: 202: 200: 196: 195: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 133: 132: 124: 123:Verifiability 121: 119: 116: 114: 111: 110: 109: 100: 96: 94: 91: 89: 85: 82: 80: 77: 76: 70: 66: 65:Learn to edit 62: 59: 54: 53: 50: 49: 45: 39: 35: 31: 30: 23: 20: 18: 17: 696: 637: 618: 578:— Preceding 574: 544:— Preceding 490:— Preceding 485: 459: 458: 439: 413: 405: 392: 373:Top-priority 372: 332: 298:Top‑priority 276:WikiProjects 259: 211: 197: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 107: 32:This is the 348:Mathematics 339:mathematics 295:Mathematics 161:free images 44:not a forum 738:Categories 601:FreeFlow99 523:Amcfreely 496:Amcfreely 264:is rated 101:if needed 84:Be polite 34:talk page 580:unsigned 546:unsigned 504:contribs 492:unsigned 440:365 days 406:Archives 212:365 days 199:Archives 69:get help 42:This is 40:article. 375:on the 266:B-class 167:WP refs 155:scholar 272:scale. 139:Google 253:This 182:JSTOR 143:books 97:Seek 724:talk 716:~~~~ 678:talk 660:talk 644:talk 625:talk 605:talk 588:talk 554:talk 500:talk 175:FENS 149:news 86:and 367:Top 189:TWL 740:: 680:) 662:) 654:-- 646:) 627:) 607:) 590:) 556:) 506:) 502:• 210:: 169:) 67:; 726:) 722:( 676:( 658:( 642:( 623:( 603:( 586:( 552:( 498:( 415:1 379:. 278:: 204:1 201:: 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 71:.

Index

Skip to table of contents
talk page
Analytic geometry
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1


level-4 vital article
content assessment

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.