Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Action of the Cockcroft

Source šŸ“

463: 929:, not this rubbish again about special UK rules for commas. Nah, yeah, NAH. Comma usage does vary according to individual preferences, but unlike certain instances of spelling and lexicon (and "different than" in the US), they are not subject to so-called national styles. I reverted to Dicklyon's commas, which are entirely appropriate. Whatever the comma usage, did you write the original "the garrisons stood their ground, suffering about 100 casualties, thirty of them being taken prisoner."? What, so 30 casualties were taken prisoner? And " being taken prisoner" is clumsy and the tense is wrong. Please concentrate on improving your style rather than falsely pumping up comma nationalism. 415: 512: 491: 522: 431: 447: 617: 596: 627: 300: 191: 372: 361: 350: 339: 328: 258: 222: 761: 741:
There is still some error in the "subsequent operations" section, with the grammar. The first sentence starts with "next day"...fix that up and I would say it meets B class in advance. Good article - there are still some structural errors that need to be corrected but this is sufficient for B class.
881:
Then Keith-264 removed them, claiming "British English" as the reason. Is that a thing? To me it just reads as an error with those commas missing ("ditched but seven" what? "saw the tanks but at" what?). This was just in the lead, but I'd fix a bunch more if were up to me (but Keith claims it's
965:
Keep the commas, or use semicolons as in the bullet-point examples above, or use separate sentences (probably the best choice in these cases). Keith-264's claim about "Britishness" of avoiding necessary commas is false; he's simply creating confusing run-ons. And no editor
1114:
You equate my prose with journalism? I suggest you stop making assumptions. I've had my say about the conduct of other editors here so I have got what I wanted. I wondered if you had considered the matter of provocation; now I know. Regards
438: 236: 422: 232: 454: 240: 153: 1059:
means making an incorrect behavioral claim, and following that with a linguistically incorrect claim about British English. What both he and you appear to mean by these claims is that the usage you see in British
1040:
If editors feel the need to punctuate a conjunction, all they need to to is simplify the sentence as you suggested above. It isn't brain surgery. PS hat do you think of the previous editor's disparagement? Regards
897:
You're getting rather proprietorial, please remember that you don't speak my language and weren't taught it at school. It would be better to rewrite a sentence than interpolate solecisms. See now, Regards
470: 244: 873:
At most of the pillboxes, the German occupants retreated as soon as they saw the tanks; at Triangle Farm, Maison du Hibou and the Cockcroft, the garrisons stood their ground, suffering about
1207: 1003:
Dicklyon gives a very good impression of owning an awful lot of articles. And I've just removed some commas which are definitely wrong in British English, tho' common in American.
1197: 147: 1217: 313: 270: 1202: 705:
What is "āŒ0ā" supposed to mean, in the lead section of the article? If this isn't a rendering issue, some kind of explanation should be added or the line should be removed.
1192: 578: 1212: 1252: 673: 299: 1237: 568: 44: 79: 1242: 870:
broke down or ditched; seven others advanced up the St Julianā€“Poelcappelle road behind a smoke barrage, their noise smothered by low-flying British aircraft.
544: 683: 1187: 1247: 265: 227: 1232: 1227: 462: 85: 535: 496: 1257: 1222: 1096:
you are entirely wrong about the commas I removed. I think your behaviour here is appalling and you need to step back, if not entirely away.
274: 649: 30: 168: 99: 1079: 993: 720:
When I moved the article from a sandbox, I tried to use an editing script before saving; I thought I'd sorted them all out. OK now?
135: 104: 20: 640: 601: 74: 202: 65: 1055:
Which previous editor's disparagement of whom? If you mean DuncanHill, I see someone who doesn't actually understand what
129: 810:
Tried to move it but was disallowed as there is a redirect from that title and I don't know how to cancel it. Regards
125: 109: 795:? And why do we cap "Action" in the lead? Are there sources that do that? I've been looking, but not finding. 744:"I'd rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me" - George S. PattonĀ :: markus1423 707:"I'd rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me" - George S. PattonĀ :: markus1423 175: 414: 208: 788: 269:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 24: 1017:
Indeed, I own all 45,000 articles on my watchlist, and all the rest, too! I plan to take over the world!
971: 55: 1076: 990: 648:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
543:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
527: 792: 70: 1101: 1008: 747: 710: 141: 190: 1169: 1134: 1120: 1046: 979: 950: 903: 867: 815: 772: 725: 161: 1148: 1022: 917: 887: 833: 800: 975: 51: 825: 1071: 1035: 985: 511: 490: 1065: 1056: 967: 1097: 1091: 1004: 935: 743: 706: 1165: 1130: 1116: 1042: 946: 926: 899: 811: 768: 736: 721: 632: 540: 430: 1181: 1144: 1018: 913: 883: 829: 796: 1173: 1152: 1138: 1124: 1105: 1084: 1050: 1026: 1012: 998: 954: 940: 921: 907: 891: 837: 819: 804: 776: 751: 729: 714: 446: 930: 622: 616: 595: 517: 858:
connecting long independent clauses (showing them here without the commas):
645: 257: 221: 1064:
is comma-averse. This is well known, but irrelevant, because
184: 15: 882:
his prerogative to keep the commas out, since he wrote it).
1066:
WP is not written in news style, as a matter of clear policy
461: 445: 429: 413: 298: 539:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 978:; I've taken the civility issues here and elsewhere to 160: 912:
True, I have no idea what you're trying to tell me.
644:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 311:
This article has been checked against the following
1164:Thanks for the sarcasm, I grant you the last word. 396: 310: 174: 787:Why do we have the date in the title? Wouldn't 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1143:So good to know that you agree with yourself. 1208:European military history task force articles 8: 1198:British military history task force articles 283:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 1218:German military history task force articles 945:Mind your manners, you ignorant ouanqueur. 1203:B-Class European military history articles 590: 553:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United Kingdom 485: 393: 307: 216: 1193:B-Class British military history articles 854:I put commas into these sentence, before 1213:B-Class German military history articles 263:This article is within the scope of the 1253:Low-importance Belgium-related articles 1129:I agree with your interpolated commas. 592: 487: 218: 188: 1238:Low-importance United Kingdom articles 970:the content they right here; see also 273:. To use this banner, please see the 286:Template:WikiProject Military history 7: 877:thirty of them being taken prisoner. 638:This article is within the scope of 533:This article is within the scope of 439:European military history task force 1243:WikiProject United Kingdom articles 658:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Belgium 556:Template:WikiProject United Kingdom 423:British military history task force 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 455:German military history task force 14: 1188:B-Class military history articles 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 1248:B-Class Belgium-related articles 866:on 19 August, five tanks of the 759: 625: 615: 594: 520: 510: 489: 370: 359: 348: 337: 326: 256: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1233:B-Class United Kingdom articles 1228:World War I task force articles 678:This article has been rated as 573:This article has been rated as 1062:journalism style in particular 1: 1258:All WikiProject Belgium pages 1069: 983: 652:and see a list of open tasks. 547:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1223:B-Class World War I articles 824:You can just ask nicely via 791:be more in keeping with our 661:Template:WikiProject Belgium 266:Military history WikiProject 1274: 955:14:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC) 941:13:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC) 922:03:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC) 908:23:57, 25 April 2021 (UTC) 892:17:46, 25 April 2021 (UTC) 838:22:49, 23 April 2021 (UTC) 820:07:17, 23 April 2021 (UTC) 805:18:12, 22 April 2021 (UTC) 684:project's importance scale 579:project's importance scale 536:WikiProject United Kingdom 331:Referencing and citation: 777:16:53, 25 July 2017 (UTC) 752:15:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC) 730:21:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC) 715:21:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC) 677: 610: 572: 505: 469: 453: 437: 421: 392: 289:military history articles 251: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1174:06:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC) 1153:04:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC) 1027:04:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC) 783:Title and caps questions 664:Belgium-related articles 1139:10:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC) 1125:10:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC) 1106:09:35, 3 May 2021 (UTC) 1085:09:21, 3 May 2021 (UTC) 1051:09:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC) 1013:07:45, 3 May 2021 (UTC) 999:07:38, 3 May 2021 (UTC) 789:Action of the Cockcroft 559:United Kingdom articles 397:Associated task forces: 342:Coverage and accuracy: 25:Action of the Cockcroft 471:World War I task force 466: 450: 434: 418: 375:Supporting materials: 303: 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 528:United Kingdom portal 465: 449: 433: 417: 302: 201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 105:No original research 980:User talk:Keith-264 641:WikiProject Belgium 364:Grammar and style: 317:for B-class status: 974:. (Not to mention 467: 451: 435: 419: 304: 271:list of open tasks 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 828:. I'll do that. 698: 697: 694: 693: 690: 689: 589: 588: 585: 584: 484: 483: 480: 479: 476: 475: 388: 387: 275:full instructions 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1265: 1095: 1083: 1039: 997: 938: 876: 868:1st Tank Brigade 865: 767: 763: 762: 740: 666: 665: 662: 659: 656: 635: 630: 629: 628: 619: 612: 611: 606: 598: 591: 561: 560: 557: 554: 551: 530: 525: 524: 523: 514: 507: 506: 501: 493: 486: 404: 394: 378: 374: 373: 367: 363: 362: 356: 352: 351: 345: 341: 340: 334: 330: 329: 308: 291: 290: 287: 284: 281: 280:Military history 260: 253: 252: 247: 228:Military history 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1273: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1178: 1177: 1089: 1033: 936: 875:100 casualties, 874: 863: 852: 785: 760: 758: 734: 703: 663: 660: 657: 654: 653: 631: 626: 624: 604: 558: 555: 552: 549: 548: 526: 521: 519: 499: 402: 376: 371: 365: 360: 354: 349: 343: 338: 332: 327: 288: 285: 282: 279: 278: 230: 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1271: 1269: 1261: 1260: 1255: 1250: 1245: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1205: 1200: 1195: 1190: 1180: 1179: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1063: 1031: 1030: 1029: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 927:User:Keith-264 879: 878: 871: 851: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 784: 781: 780: 779: 756: 755: 754: 702: 699: 696: 695: 692: 691: 688: 687: 680:Low-importance 676: 670: 669: 667: 650:the discussion 637: 636: 633:Belgium portal 620: 608: 607: 605:Lowā€‘importance 599: 587: 586: 583: 582: 575:Low-importance 571: 565: 564: 562: 550:United Kingdom 545:the discussion 541:United Kingdom 532: 531: 515: 503: 502: 500:Lowā€‘importance 497:United Kingdom 494: 482: 481: 478: 477: 474: 473: 468: 458: 457: 452: 442: 441: 436: 426: 425: 420: 410: 409: 407: 405: 399: 398: 390: 389: 386: 385: 383: 381: 380: 379: 368: 357: 346: 335: 321: 320: 318: 305: 295: 294: 292: 261: 249: 248: 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1270: 1259: 1256: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1246: 1244: 1241: 1239: 1236: 1234: 1231: 1229: 1226: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1201: 1199: 1196: 1194: 1191: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1183: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1113: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1093: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1081: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1067: 1061: 1058: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1037: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 1001: 1000: 995: 992: 989: 988: 981: 977: 973: 969: 964: 956: 952: 948: 944: 943: 942: 939: 934: 933: 928: 925: 924: 923: 919: 915: 911: 910: 909: 905: 901: 896: 895: 894: 893: 889: 885: 872: 869: 861: 860: 859: 857: 849: 846:Comma before 845: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 822: 821: 817: 813: 809: 808: 807: 806: 802: 798: 794: 790: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 757: 753: 749: 745: 738: 733: 732: 731: 727: 723: 719: 718: 717: 716: 712: 708: 700: 685: 681: 675: 672: 671: 668: 651: 647: 643: 642: 634: 623: 621: 618: 614: 613: 609: 603: 600: 597: 593: 580: 576: 570: 567: 566: 563: 546: 542: 538: 537: 529: 518: 516: 513: 509: 508: 504: 498: 495: 492: 488: 472: 464: 460: 459: 456: 448: 444: 443: 440: 432: 428: 427: 424: 416: 412: 411: 408: 406: 401: 400: 395: 391: 384: 382: 377:criterion met 369: 366:criterion met 358: 355:criterion met 347: 344:criterion met 336: 333:criterion met 325: 324: 323: 322: 319: 316: 315: 309: 306: 301: 297: 296: 293: 276: 272: 268: 267: 262: 259: 255: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1163: 1072: 986: 972:WP:MERCILESS 931: 880: 855: 853: 847: 786: 764: 704: 679: 639: 574: 534: 312: 264: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1073:SMcCandlish 1036:SMcCandlish 987:SMcCandlish 793:WP:CRITERIA 353:Structure: 245:World War I 148:free images 31:not a forum 1182:Categories 1098:DuncanHill 1092:SMcCandish 1005:DuncanHill 1166:Keith-264 1131:Keith-264 1117:Keith-264 1043:Keith-264 947:Keith-264 900:Keith-264 864:4:45 a.m. 812:Keith-264 769:Keith-264 737:Keith-264 722:Keith-264 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1145:Dicklyon 1019:Dicklyon 976:WP:CIVIL 914:Dicklyon 884:Dicklyon 830:Dicklyon 797:Dicklyon 314:criteria 237:European 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 968:WP:OWNs 826:WP:RMTR 701:Content 682:on the 655:Belgium 646:Belgium 602:Belgium 577:on the 233:British 199:B-class 154:WPĀ refs 142:scholar 1057:WP:OWN 937:(talk) 241:German 205:scale. 126:Google 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1170:talk 1149:talk 1135:talk 1121:talk 1102:talk 1047:talk 1023:talk 1009:talk 951:talk 932:Tony 918:talk 904:talk 888:talk 834:talk 816:talk 801:talk 773:talk 765:Done 748:talk 726:talk 711:talk 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1082:šŸ˜¼ 996:šŸ˜¼ 982:.) 862:At 856:but 848:but 674:Low 569:Low 176:TWL 1184:: 1172:) 1151:) 1137:) 1123:) 1104:) 1070:ā€” 1068:. 1049:) 1025:) 1011:) 984:ā€” 953:) 920:) 906:) 890:) 836:) 818:) 803:) 775:) 750:) 728:) 713:) 403:/ 243:/ 239:/ 235:/ 231:: 156:) 54:; 1168:( 1147:( 1133:( 1119:( 1100:( 1094:: 1090:@ 1080:Ā¢ 1077:ā˜ 1045:( 1038:: 1034:@ 1021:( 1007:( 994:Ā¢ 991:ā˜ 949:( 916:( 902:( 886:( 850:? 832:( 814:( 799:( 771:( 746:( 739:: 735:@ 724:( 709:( 686:. 581:. 277:. 211:: 172:Ā· 166:Ā· 158:Ā· 151:Ā· 145:Ā· 139:Ā· 133:Ā· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Action of the Cockcroft
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WPĀ refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Military history
British
European

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘