Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:Age appropriateness

Source đź“ť

570:
from some prominent publishers. Fortunately, I found an article with a high impact factor, summarizing its content and phrase a new definition for age-appropriateness. The second problem is that the areas of application of age-appropriateness were insufficient and underdeveloped. The previous page only introduces the consideration of age-appropriateness in toy selection and media presentations. These two areas are absolutely related to the topic but are far insufficient to reveal the importance of age appropriateness to child development. The reasons why age-appropriateness is vital in these areas were also not detailed developed. Therefore, I first found several reliable sources to improve the explanations about the application and importance of age-appropriateness in these two areas. I found that age-appropriateness is closely related to children’s cognitive, emotional, physical, and social development. Therefore, I added the other two parts, introducing the importance of entering the school at an appropriate age and developing age-appropriate social skills. These two parts are closely related to children’s academic performance and relationships with peers. The third problem is with the reference link. It previously mixed up citation and external links together, which I think is quite confusing. I cleaned up the reference list by separating citations and external links.
278: 250: 404: 376: 480: 354: 288: 219: 390: 264: 190: 414: 518:
Going hand-in-hand with Globalize, there isn't really discussion about the vast cultural differences in age appropriateness. What is inappropriate in one country at a given age often is just fine in others. (e.g. a general example would be the difference between the USA and Germany on depictions of
569:
I think the concept of age-appropriateness is an important concept considering child development. Therefore, it should be better developed. The first problem is with the definition. The previous definition was really vague and incomplete. Therefore, I tried to search the definition for this concept
153: 522:
There are probably many good sources (journal articles, studies, etc.) that would provide good factual insight (obviously, my personal observations in the last point are not enough to pass
200: 147: 629: 470: 614: 344: 79: 624: 460: 44: 609: 334: 634: 619: 436: 85: 604: 519:
Sex/Nudity and Violence: in the USA violent things are typically "age appropriate" at a younger age than in Germany. The reverse for Sex/Nudity.)
310: 30: 427: 381: 301: 255: 99: 104: 20: 168: 551: 135: 74: 230: 65: 585: 196: 510:
US & Canada are discussed and there are links to film/TV ratings agencies in other countries, but no discussion...
129: 109: 125: 236: 218: 573: 539: 175: 533: 55: 435:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
309:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
581: 70: 547: 189: 161: 24: 577: 141: 419: 277: 249: 51: 523: 543: 293: 598: 389: 263: 403: 375: 589: 555: 479: 432: 409: 353: 287: 283: 306: 212: 184: 15: 487:
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
478: 361:
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
352: 160: 431:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 305:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 174: 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 8: 216: 537: 370: 244: 372: 246: 445:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Psychology 630:Psychology articles needing attention 319:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Sociology 7: 615:Sociology articles needing attention 425:This article is within the scope of 299:This article is within the scope of 235:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 625:Mid-importance psychology articles 199:on 9 February 2020. The result of 14: 610:Mid-importance sociology articles 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 412: 402: 388: 374: 286: 276: 262: 248: 217: 188: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 635:WikiProject Psychology articles 620:Start-Class psychology articles 506:Couple of observations/issues: 465:This article has been rated as 448:Template:WikiProject Psychology 339:This article has been rated as 195:This article was nominated for 605:Start-Class sociology articles 322:Template:WikiProject Sociology 1: 590:11:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC) 439:and see a list of open tasks. 313:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 565:My adaptations to this page 651: 556:23:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC) 471:project's importance scale 345:project's importance scale 486: 464: 397: 360: 338: 271: 243: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 534:Template:Expert needed 483: 428:WikiProject Psychology 357: 225:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 482: 356: 302:WikiProject Sociology 229:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 502:Globalize/Unbalanced 105:No original research 451:psychology articles 25:Age appropriateness 484: 358: 325:sociology articles 231:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 576:comment added by 558: 542:comment added by 499: 498: 495: 494: 491: 490: 420:Psychology portal 369: 368: 365: 364: 211: 210: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 642: 592: 453: 452: 449: 446: 443: 422: 417: 416: 415: 406: 399: 398: 393: 392: 391: 386: 378: 371: 327: 326: 323: 320: 317: 296: 291: 290: 280: 273: 272: 267: 266: 265: 260: 252: 245: 228: 222: 221: 213: 192: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 650: 649: 645: 644: 643: 641: 640: 639: 595: 594: 571: 567: 504: 450: 447: 444: 441: 440: 418: 413: 411: 387: 384: 324: 321: 318: 315: 314: 292: 285: 261: 258: 226: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 648: 646: 638: 637: 632: 627: 622: 617: 612: 607: 597: 596: 566: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 530: 527: 520: 511: 503: 500: 497: 496: 493: 492: 489: 488: 485: 475: 474: 467:Mid-importance 463: 457: 456: 454: 437:the discussion 424: 423: 407: 395: 394: 385:Mid‑importance 379: 367: 366: 363: 362: 359: 349: 348: 341:Mid-importance 337: 331: 330: 328: 311:the discussion 298: 297: 294:Society portal 281: 269: 268: 259:Mid‑importance 253: 241: 240: 234: 223: 209: 208: 201:the discussion 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 647: 636: 633: 631: 628: 626: 623: 621: 618: 616: 613: 611: 608: 606: 603: 602: 600: 593: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 564: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 535: 532:Perhaps even 531: 528: 525: 521: 517: 516: 515: 512: 509: 508: 507: 501: 481: 477: 476: 472: 468: 462: 459: 458: 455: 438: 434: 430: 429: 421: 410: 408: 405: 401: 400: 396: 383: 380: 377: 373: 355: 351: 350: 346: 342: 336: 333: 332: 329: 312: 308: 304: 303: 295: 289: 284: 282: 279: 275: 274: 270: 257: 254: 251: 247: 242: 238: 232: 224: 220: 215: 214: 206: 202: 198: 194: 191: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 572:— Preceding 568: 538:— Preceding 513: 505: 466: 426: 340: 300: 237:WikiProjects 204: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 514:Unbalanced: 227:Start-class 148:free images 31:not a forum 599:Categories 544:Jewell D D 442:Psychology 433:Psychology 382:Psychology 316:Sociology 307:sociology 256:Sociology 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 586:contribs 574:unsigned 552:contribs 540:unsigned 197:deletion 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 578:Woshimz 469:on the 343:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 524:WP:NOR 233:scale. 126:Google 526:... ) 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 582:talk 548:talk 529:True 205:keep 203:was 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 536:? 461:Mid 335:Mid 176:TWL 601:: 588:) 584:• 554:) 550:• 156:) 54:; 580:( 546:( 473:. 347:. 239:: 207:. 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Age appropriateness
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑