732:
current flawed version constantly refers to VNN and Alex Linder as "White
Supremacist", whatever that is. I don't think there's anyone on Earth who is a "White Supremacist." There are "White Nationalists" and "White Separatists" (approximately the same) but no one who contributes to VNN has any time to worry about one race being "better" or "superior" to another. The position of VNN and of Alex Linder for that matter, is that we wish our race to survive, that our race is under dire threat from such Jewish-promoted schemes as miscegenation, integration, hate crime laws, "civil rights" laws, etc. VNNers don't wish to rule over or dominate other peoples, we seek only self-determination and a nation exclusively of our own people, not because we're "superior" to those other people, but because we believe that life is best and healthiest when our race can be unto itself and self-governing. Secondarily, there are other minor things, such as the assertion that Alex Linder left the NA after "allowing critisim of it on his site" or some such silliness. The simple fact is that Alex left the NA and began criticising it's new leadership after it became apparent that the new leadership did not share Dr. Pierce's vision for the organization, or for Our Cause, that the new leadership was likely corrupt, and certainly was not acting in the best interests of the race. The simple fact is, the article, being on Knowledge, purports to be from a Neutral Point of View, yet it's written as though some ARA commie thug wrote it. This constant reversion back to edits done by moderators or "approved" commies, despite improvements to NPOV by those whose edits are being reverted, is getting very old, and gives wikipedia a bad name amongst those not squarely in this peculiar political mindset found here. One of the worst examples of POV bias is how you people always quote some ADL or SPLC jew hack and his inflammatory opinion about the subject, but when I put a blurb in about how VNN supporters find Mr. Linder's spintros appealing, that gets deleted too. So you can cite the opinions of those who hate Alex Linder, just not the opinions of those who like Alex Linder? WTF is that?!?!?
961:
up in their bios, though that may be the opposite for activists. (The biographies of such figures as Martin Luther King, Daniel
Berrigan, or Adolph Hitler would be incomplete without the record of their arrests while leading protests). The simple fact is that we (the public) don't care how good a parent someone is, or how kind they are to animals, as those don't make people notable (again, activists excepted). People get arrested at rallies all of the time, but this was comparatively well-covered by newspapers and broadcast stations. (Ah, I just found this:
567:
546:
577:
462:
441:
472:
282:
264:
233:
373:
352:
965:- That's an indication of how much went into this - 300 cops and weeks of planning.) One arrest while leading a rally isn't sufficient alone for an article, but this is a rare occasion for Linder to make it into the mainstream press. So far as notable things he's done, this is towards the top. It should be mentioned. How's this:
292:
798:
satisfy their own complacency but insist that the word entire see things their way. Making excuses for sexism or objectification or whatever makes one as deplorable as any white supremacist bigot making excuses for the likes of the linders of the world but the deluded are so well and truly brainwashed.
1199:
It is not a "reach" per se to call VNN racist. They literally use the n-word, the 6 letter f-word without ANY restraint whatsoever; enough to make a
Klansman blush. Just as it is a false statement to call someone a racist when they are not, it is equally dishonest and fallacious to gloss it over when
960:
Let's see, to begin with he wasn't just "at" the rally - he organized it. He's an activist, so doing things like organizing rallies is a significant part of what makes him notable. Of course we don't want to glorify the event either. Second, I don't suppose most folks would want their arrests to show
897:
that the press notes and nothing else, we will end up with some very lopsided biographies. I think we have to use some discernment and not lose sight of the fact that our articles are about a person in the round, not just a collection of tidbits about them. And if we are having to focus on the rally,
1385:
It certainly fits this: "What should be linked ...Knowledge articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the subject's official site, if any." But it sooo fails the "tasteful" canon -- tho' on the other hand, tastelessness is what the guy's all about, and nothing
854:
Then, the contributor replaced the actual quotes from the reference and replaced it with seemingly made-up stuff. It went back and forth a few times. How can untrue and misleading information, not found in the reference given, be "proper" and actual quotes from the reference be "improperly written?"
850:
The original contributor put in a couple of misleading and untrue sentences, something about "the police had ordered Linder to leave the rally." and then linked to the reference given above. There was nothing in the story that said that. It looked like the contributor made it up. I corrected it - by
764:
The quote about "A woman who can think". There to show his sexism. I can't figure out how to get the precise date he wrote that... My bad most likely. There's also quite a bit in that news update showing what seems to be pretty heavy paranoia about the medical profession. Anyway, I put it up because
731:
Other than simply a bias against VNN, also known as a "POV", I cna see no reason whatsoever that my edits of last month were reverted to the prior extraordinarily flawed version which uses loaded words and hate language to deride Mr. Linder, rather than descriptive terms and facts. For instance, the
1038:
In reply to "Actually, there's nothing that Linder has done that the major media has thought worth writing about:" I wasn't talking about what Linder has done, I was speaking about the crime itself, the murder of 2 whites kids by a group of blacks, according to most news reports. Other reports have
913:
I disagree, as the rally was a protest about 2 white kids being brutally murdered by a black group, and this was part of that. Apparantly no one in the major media feels it's worth writing about either, but that's another issue. It says the anon edits were removed because "it's not being written up
868:
Yes, neo-Nazis get arrested, but this was more than "barely" news. What's notable about a person is what's noted. This was noted in many news outlets. It's not like we're covering a drunk-driving arrest of a senator. If neo-Nazis are known for getting arrested then it's not an anomolous incident. I
736:
His statements that "hites already know blacks are stupid, violent, destructive apelike creatures" and that "Jews are nation wreckers. We WHITE MEN created the nations they wreck. It is time for us to engage in wrecking of our own. DEATH TO THE JEWS" don't sound like someone who has " time to worry
892:
the press notes as "notable" in the context of an encyclopaedia article. The press doesn't tend to note the good things about a person. That's the problem with articles about near-nobodies like this: if they do make the press, it's rarely going to be for anything good. If we make it our policy, or
1042:
I've heard the crime being described as the "crime of the century," the story of two white kids being tortured, raped, murdered, and butchered by a group of blacks. As someone pointed out, Alex Linder was the organizer the rally, and since this is His page, how this isn't' newsworthy is certainly
837:
It's just not big enough to mention in a biography, Slim. I think we need to steer clear of creating compilations of bad news and calling them bios (even if we don't approve of the subject). Indeed, a neoNazi getting arrested is barely even news. Must not have been much going on around there that
711:
I'm not sure why you would want to delete this article. It's simply a source of information for who this person is, and the organizations he created. There is no support in the article for his beliefs. It's important to know about things in our world, whether we like or agree with them or not. If
1352:
It's about as ugly a thing as there is on the net, but WP isn't censored. It's one of his chief activities, therfore requires notice in his article. Now, it's a separate question whether we're within wikipolicy in deliberately doing away with both the title of the page and the link. I'm going to
1279:
When every
Knowledge entry for every misogynist celebrity makes mention of its subject's attitudes toward women then and only then will I trust the editors who insist on calling a spade a spade. What's good for racists is good for sexists. But then the paradigm of the modern left is outstanding
797:
It only -seems- tame because the average anti-racist/anti-nazi is complacent as can be when it comes to gender. The most misogynist of pigs I have ever had the displeasure of encountering have been self-identified leftists and antifa types too stupid to comprehend their own hypocrisy when they
1098:
I've removed this again. It's a minor incident. We would not include this in a biography of a figure we approved of, and I don't see the reason for the double standard. It hardly got major coverage, Will, after all. If you must include it, the very brief insert you gave above would be enough.
1144:: "...editors should try and work quotations into the body of the article, rather than in a stand alone quote section. Knowledge is not a list or repository of loosely associated topics such as quotations. A simple list of quotations would be better suited for our sister project, Wikiquote."
1109:
So I've reinstated the short piece from above. We don't need an essay on a minor protest, even if the guy did get arrested. He's a minor figure, barely noted, so I don't see any great need for a long piece about him. Also, I don't see what he has to do with
Judaism, except for hating it.
748:
Why is it that when factual material is published that points out the largely ignorant opinions of others there is suddenly a call to "neutrality"? Either Linder said these things, or he didn't. If he didn't we'll remove them. If he did, well then, who's stupidity is that? -
1420:
I don't think a warning is necessary because the entire article makes clear what the subject's views are. While those views are distasteful to many, if not most, people, this project isn't censored. By comparison, we also have articles on nasty porn with external links.
1054:
But those are other issues. The original reason given that my anon edit was deleted was originally "because it's not being written up properly," not because it wasn't "newsworthy." No one answered my question which was, "what was improper about the anon edits?"
785:
Tame, but telling... I've seen non-VNN racists mock Linder as, basically, a scared little boy... He's not married, is he? I know comments are made to the effect of "If he cares so much about the white race, why isn't he getting married and fathering white
969:
Linder organized what has been described as a "racially charged protest" on May 26, 2007 in
Knoxville, Tennessee that attracted 30 supporters, around 60 counterprotesters, and 300 law enforcement officers. Linder fought with police and was the only
1184:
Personally, I do care if VNN is racist, but, in any event, the article doesn't use that word. It does use the words antisemitic and White supremacist in the lead without references, but the lead summarizes later paragraphs which are well sourced.
918:
Actually, there's nothing that Linder has done that the major media has thought worth writing about. Most sources available are either local media or specialized organizations. If major media coerage is the standard then this guy isn't notable.
765:
while his sexism is often ignored in favour of his racism, it's pretty heavy. And actually counterproductive, given that if he wants the white race or whatnot to reproduce, it would seem sort of obvious that women might be desirable. Heh heh. --
1046:
In response to "It's hard to describe in a few words:" The murder of the couple was the subject of the rally. I don't think it's hard to describe in a few words at all. "A Knoxville rally in protest of a
Murdered white couple."
938:
I don't think he is "notable" in anything but the loosest sense of the word. I'd like to note that it's not that I don't, or we don't, consider that two white kids' being murdered by a black group is not important, but that
775:
Boy- that is about the tamest piece of text on the page you got it from. That said, we probably have enough quotations. If anyone wants to add more we should either remove some or ship the whole set over to
Wikiquotes.
1081:
I've added a few words and a link to reference the actual crime being protested. I can't answer your last question as I didn't write the remark you asked about, but I can suggest that we focus on future edits instead.
153:
1120:
Alex Linder hasn't done anything noteworthy that has been recognized by mainstream sources or media. This article should be under constant scrutiny. If it were up to me I would nominate this article for
1050:
And, frankly, I expected less opinion stated as fact from people editing a online encyclopedia. Calling someone a "near nobody" does not come across as professional. But it's your credibility, not mine.
943:, getting arrested at a rally cannot be considered a significant event. Dude, I've been arrested more than once, and if I ever have a biography written about me, I'd not be expecting to read about that.
1722:
423:
607:
1512:
1230:
If you define racism in it's truest and deepest meening, you will find that vnn is not in any way racist. In fact, most things which are classified as racist, simply are not. --
1147:
The quotations in this article don't add to it; if there's a point being made, then make it, and back it up with a quote, this isn't a place to advertise his "snappy" lines. -
212:
624:
147:
1687:
413:
1717:
1564:
1560:
1546:
985:
Is that neutral, brief, and informative enough? Also- I'm not sure what point you're making about the subject of the rally. It's hard to describe in a few words.
660:
650:
869:
think we should give it a sentence, though it should probably focus on the rally (reported to have drawn 30 supporters and twice as many counter-protesters).
1692:
1682:
1667:
217:
1727:
1712:
614:
200:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
972:
825:
79:
1702:
528:
518:
389:
1390:
restrictions apply. Now, there's a natural reluctance to give the guy a platform, but I'm not sure that's a wikiprincipled way to think about this.
690:
619:
1677:
1672:
310:
192:
1707:
1697:
1513:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110909164547/http://articles.boston.com/2011-03-10/news/29343665_1_white-supremacist-day-parade-route-mark-potok
1258:
Racism has many hotly contested meanings and has different definitions depending on who you're talking to. It shouldn't even be used at all.
85:
380:
357:
314:
1474:
1457:
1287:
1073:
805:
590:
551:
494:
44:
1516:
1259:
1231:
602:
318:
1083:
1019:
994:
920:
870:
309:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
1295:
1178:
305:
269:
99:
30:
1473:, why don't you think this source is reliable enough? It's his own website and article, he mentions his middle name there.
485:
446:
104:
20:
598:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
168:
74:
1607:
1376:
1190:
686:
244:
135:
65:
1165:, even if it's true. You can say they've said things considered by some as racist and cite it. How about let's all
1644:
Is his full name "Milton
Alexander Linder" "Alexander Ruedy Linder"? He frequently goes by "Alex Ruedy Linder".
1563:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1306:(pasted from a userpage discussion on retaining or deleting mention of/link to Linder's thoroughly hateful blog)
974:
1335:
I could be wrong, but I don't think it's an appropriate link. At the very least, it should contain a warning.
828:, because it's not being written up properly, but I'm leaving the link here so it can be added at some point.
232:
1069:
129:
1598:
1504:
1478:
1461:
1453:
1372:
1291:
1263:
1186:
809:
201:
109:
976:
1649:
1630:
1235:
1126:
787:
766:
1582:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1570:
1428:
1089:
1065:
1025:
1000:
926:
876:
250:
125:
1503:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1122:
1353:
paste this discussion on the article's talk-page, and see what kind of discussion it might bring out.
1537:
1283:
1141:
1061:
801:
750:
582:
211:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
988:
727:
Constant reversion of edits which actually improve the NPOV of the article and or fix errors of fact
1517:
http://articles.boston.com/2011-03-10/news/29343665_1_white-supremacist-day-parade-route-mark-potok
1395:
1358:
1343:
1325:
1311:
1241:
1203:
175:
161:
55:
993:? I think the AP writer got it best with "racially charged protest". Can we improve on her prose?
777:
493:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
388:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1207:
1166:
215:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
70:
1567:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
566:
545:
1583:
1645:
1626:
1174:
962:
717:
51:
1058:
I'm pretty busy, so I have to drop this, but I would like my last question answered, please.
1423:
1247:
1219:
1086:
1022:
997:
923:
873:
813:
769:
297:
1590:
1111:
1100:
944:
899:
859:
839:
829:
738:
712:
there were no articles about hitler and nazis, eventually no one would know who they were.
477:
208:
141:
858:
It's such a minor thing that it's not worth writing about at all, let alone improperly.
1549:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1391:
1354:
1336:
1321:
1307:
1162:
385:
1617:
I added links to Alex Linder's collected production (media / writing) at the location
1589:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
471:
461:
440:
1661:
1470:
1387:
1213:
595:
1386:
could illustrate him more honestly than his own website (thus, I don't see that any
1368:
1170:
713:
1556:
1496:
1148:
703:
694:
24:
281:
263:
1555:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
963:"These law enforcement agencies spent several weeks preparing for this rally."
572:
467:
287:
978:
594:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1156:
838:
day. Worst case, I think a single sentence would be the maximum merited.
490:
1140:
I've removed the "Quotations" section from this article, as stated in
372:
351:
1280:
hypocrisy as far as gender is concerned so I won't hold my breath.
1653:
1634:
1612:
1482:
1465:
1434:
1399:
1380:
1362:
1347:
1329:
1315:
1267:
1252:
1224:
1194:
1151:
1130:
1114:
1103:
1092:
1028:
1003:
947:
929:
902:
879:
862:
842:
832:
790:
780:
753:
741:
721:
706:
697:
317:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1157:
I don't care if Vanguard is racist, it's not our place to say that
893:
our procedure I suppose you could call it, that we will include
1018:
I went ahead and added some text like the above plus a little.
1456:, I have discovered and cited that his middle name is Ruedy.
226:
207:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
184:
15:
1618:
1522:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1622:
1507:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1500:
1200:
the subject in question, Alex Linder, <redacted: -->
1039:
indicated that about 100 protesters showed up, not 30.
160:
737:
about one race being better or superior to another."
1723:
Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
489:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
384:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1559:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1244:- personal view unrelated to article improvement.–
914:properly." What was improper about the anon edits?
1619:Alex Linder archive website (www.AlexLinder.com)
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
760:Added a quote, but can't figure some things out
1625:. Please let me know if these are acceptable.
1545:This message was posted before February 2018.
1043:subject to debate - in my opinion of course.
174:
8:
898:Will, it's not so much about Linder, is it?
230:
1495:I have just modified one external link on
540:
435:
346:
258:
1169:that Vanguard is a racist news network.--
1623:VNN Discussion Group (www.VNNForum.com)
1320:Hi-- any reason for removing the link?
941:in the context of a person's whole life
793:(ED: Sorry, this was I, Edward Wakelin)
542:
437:
348:
260:
1688:Low-importance Discrimination articles
888:I don't agree that we should consider
759:
1718:Low-importance United States articles
1534:to let others know (documentation at
1212:Note: Comments violating Knowledge's
851:quoting directly from the reference.
7:
1367:The relevant policy can be found at
1214:biographies of living persons policy
1201:; he believes that <redacted: -->
588:This article is within the scope of
483:This article is within the scope of
398:Knowledge:WikiProject Discrimination
378:This article is within the scope of
303:This article is within the scope of
1693:WikiProject Discrimination articles
1683:Start-Class Discrimination articles
1668:Biography articles of living people
635:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
401:Template:WikiProject Discrimination
249:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1728:WikiProject United States articles
1713:Start-Class United States articles
824:I've removed the anon edits about
638:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1499:. Please take a moment to review
847:Commenting on the above comment:
1703:Low-importance politics articles
575:
565:
544:
470:
460:
439:
371:
350:
290:
280:
262:
231:
190:This article must adhere to the
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1238:) 03:39, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
655:This article has been rated as
523:This article has been rated as
418:This article has been rated as
327:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
1678:WikiProject Biography articles
1673:Start-Class biography articles
1621:and the very active VNN Forum
1161:Calling Vanguard News Network
689:. The discussion can be found
503:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
330:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
1708:WikiProject Politics articles
1698:Start-Class politics articles
1483:04:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
1466:00:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
1253:17:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
1225:17:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
1195:06:59, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
791:16:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
742:02:10, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
722:07:20, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
698:00:58, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
506:Template:WikiProject Politics
497:and see a list of open tasks.
392:and see a list of open tasks.
193:biographies of living persons
42:Put new text under old text.
1179:01:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
1115:05:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
1104:05:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
781:02:21, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
770:19:54, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
754:14:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
707:10:13, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
702:ROFL! Is this guy for real?
315:contribute to the discussion
1613:08:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
205:must be removed immediately
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1744:
1654:22:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
1576:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1492:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1435:20:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
1400:19:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
1381:18:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
1363:21:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
1348:21:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
1330:12:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
1316:21:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
1296:08:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
1240:Note: Comment removed per
1210:) 19:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
1167:just let the reader decide
1131:14:29, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
814:08:01, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
661:project's importance scale
529:project's importance scale
381:WikiProject Discrimination
1635:14:51, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
1152:20:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
654:
591:WikiProject United States
560:
522:
455:
417:
366:
275:
257:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1268:09:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
1093:08:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
1029:11:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
1004:10:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
948:08:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
930:06:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
903:08:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
880:05:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
863:05:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
843:04:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
833:13:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
685:This article survived a
596:United States of America
1488:External links modified
404:Discrimination articles
641:United States articles
239:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1216:have been removed. –
1064:comment was added by
306:WikiProject Biography
100:Neutral point of view
1557:regular verification
1142:Knowledge:Quotations
583:United States portal
486:WikiProject Politics
105:No original research
1547:After February 2018
1526:parameter below to
609:Articles Requested!
1601:InternetArchiveBot
1552:InternetArchiveBot
1454:Steven J. Anderson
1373:Steven J. Anderson
1187:Steven J. Anderson
333:biography articles
245:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1577:
1286:comment added by
1077:
804:comment added by
687:Vote for Deletion
681:Vote for Deletion
675:
674:
671:
670:
667:
666:
539:
538:
535:
534:
509:politics articles
434:
433:
430:
429:
345:
344:
341:
340:
225:
224:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1735:
1611:
1602:
1575:
1574:
1553:
1541:
1431:
1426:
1340:
1298:
1251:
1223:
1059:
816:
643:
642:
639:
636:
633:
585:
580:
579:
578:
569:
562:
561:
556:
548:
541:
511:
510:
507:
504:
501:
480:
475:
474:
464:
457:
456:
451:
443:
436:
424:importance scale
406:
405:
402:
399:
396:
375:
368:
367:
362:
354:
347:
335:
334:
331:
328:
325:
311:join the project
300:
298:Biography portal
295:
294:
293:
284:
277:
276:
266:
259:
242:
236:
235:
227:
213:this noticeboard
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1743:
1742:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1658:
1657:
1642:
1605:
1600:
1568:
1561:have permission
1551:
1535:
1505:this simple FaQ
1490:
1451:
1429:
1424:
1338:
1304:
1281:
1255:
1245:
1227:
1217:
1159:
1138:
1060:—The preceding
822:
799:
788:216.191.209.118
762:
751:Ta bu shi da yu
729:
683:
640:
637:
634:
631:
630:
629:
615:Become a Member
581:
576:
574:
554:
508:
505:
502:
499:
498:
478:Politics portal
476:
469:
449:
403:
400:
397:
394:
393:
360:
332:
329:
326:
323:
322:
296:
291:
289:
243:on Knowledge's
240:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1741:
1739:
1731:
1730:
1725:
1720:
1715:
1710:
1705:
1700:
1695:
1690:
1685:
1680:
1675:
1670:
1660:
1659:
1641:
1638:
1595:
1594:
1587:
1520:
1519:
1511:Added archive
1489:
1486:
1450:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1303:
1300:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1239:
1211:
1158:
1155:
1137:
1134:
1118:
1117:
1096:
1095:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
989:Black on While
983:
982:
981:
953:
952:
951:
950:
933:
932:
908:
907:
906:
905:
883:
882:
821:
818:
795:
794:
783:
767:Edward Wakelin
761:
758:
757:
756:
745:
744:
728:
725:
682:
679:
677:
673:
672:
669:
668:
665:
664:
657:Low-importance
653:
647:
646:
644:
628:
627:
622:
617:
612:
605:
603:Template Usage
599:
587:
586:
570:
558:
557:
555:Low‑importance
549:
537:
536:
533:
532:
525:Low-importance
521:
515:
514:
512:
495:the discussion
482:
481:
465:
453:
452:
450:Low‑importance
444:
432:
431:
428:
427:
420:Low-importance
416:
410:
409:
407:
395:Discrimination
390:the discussion
386:Discrimination
376:
364:
363:
361:Low‑importance
358:Discrimination
355:
343:
342:
339:
338:
336:
302:
301:
285:
273:
272:
267:
255:
254:
248:
237:
223:
222:
218:this help page
202:poorly sourced
188:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1740:
1729:
1726:
1724:
1721:
1719:
1716:
1714:
1711:
1709:
1706:
1704:
1701:
1699:
1696:
1694:
1691:
1689:
1686:
1684:
1681:
1679:
1676:
1674:
1671:
1669:
1666:
1665:
1663:
1656:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1639:
1637:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1615:
1614:
1609:
1604:
1603:
1592:
1588:
1585:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1572:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1548:
1543:
1539:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1493:
1487:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1475:173.51.128.50
1472:
1468:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1458:173.51.128.50
1455:
1448:
1436:
1433:
1432:
1427:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1346:
1345:
1342:
1341:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1318:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1301:
1299:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1288:183.77.252.53
1285:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1256:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1243:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1226:
1222:
1221:
1215:
1209:
1205:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1163:isn't neutral
1154:
1153:
1150:
1145:
1143:
1135:
1133:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1116:
1113:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1102:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1066:69.246.221.56
1063:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1030:
1027:
1024:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1005:
1002:
999:
996:
992:
990:
984:
980:
977:
975:
973:
971:
967:
966:
964:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
949:
946:
942:
937:
936:
935:
934:
931:
928:
925:
922:
917:
916:
915:
911:
904:
901:
896:
891:
887:
886:
885:
884:
881:
878:
875:
872:
867:
866:
865:
864:
861:
856:
852:
848:
845:
844:
841:
835:
834:
831:
827:
819:
817:
815:
811:
807:
806:183.77.252.53
803:
792:
789:
784:
782:
779:
774:
773:
772:
771:
768:
755:
752:
747:
746:
743:
740:
735:
734:
733:
726:
724:
723:
719:
715:
709:
708:
705:
700:
699:
696:
692:
688:
680:
678:
662:
658:
652:
649:
648:
645:
632:United States
626:
623:
621:
618:
616:
613:
611:
610:
606:
604:
601:
600:
597:
593:
592:
584:
573:
571:
568:
564:
563:
559:
553:
552:United States
550:
547:
543:
530:
526:
520:
517:
516:
513:
496:
492:
488:
487:
479:
473:
468:
466:
463:
459:
458:
454:
448:
445:
442:
438:
425:
421:
415:
412:
411:
408:
391:
387:
383:
382:
377:
374:
370:
369:
365:
359:
356:
353:
349:
337:
320:
319:documentation
316:
312:
308:
307:
299:
288:
286:
283:
279:
278:
274:
271:
268:
265:
261:
256:
252:
246:
238:
234:
229:
228:
220:
219:
214:
210:
206:
203:
199:
195:
194:
189:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1646:Kart2401real
1643:
1627:TonyMorris68
1616:
1599:
1596:
1571:source check
1550:
1544:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1521:
1494:
1491:
1469:
1452:
1422:
1344:
1337:
1319:
1305:
1282:— Preceding
1278:
1260:50.29.16.122
1246:
1242:WP:NOTAFORUM
1232:98.236.11.20
1218:
1160:
1146:
1139:
1123:METOKNOWONLY
1119:
1097:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
987:Protesting "
986:
968:
940:
912:
910:commenting:
909:
894:
889:
857:
853:
849:
846:
836:
823:
820:Recent story
800:— Preceding
796:
786:children?"--
763:
730:
710:
701:
684:
676:
656:
620:Project Talk
608:
589:
524:
484:
419:
379:
304:
251:WikiProjects
216:
204:
197:
191:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1538:Sourcecheck
1497:Alex Linder
1449:Middle Name
1425:Will Beback
1087:Will Beback
1023:Will Beback
998:Will Beback
924:Will Beback
874:Will Beback
241:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
25:Alex Linder
1662:Categories
1608:Report bug
1136:Quotations
1112:Grace Note
1101:Grace Note
945:Grace Note
900:Grace Note
895:everything
890:everything
860:Grace Note
840:Grace Note
830:SlimVirgin
739:SlimVirgin
1640:Full name
1591:this tool
1584:this tool
1392:DavidOaks
1355:DavidOaks
1322:DavidOaks
1308:DavidOaks
1121:deletion.
324:Biography
270:Biography
209:libellous
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1597:Cheers.—
1471:GabrielF
1284:unsigned
1204:Rock8591
1074:contribs
1062:unsigned
802:unsigned
500:Politics
491:politics
447:Politics
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1524:checked
1501:my edit
1302:Website
1171:Ipatrol
991:" crime
970:arrest.
778:Willmcw
714:Landroo
659:on the
527:on the
422:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1532:failed
1388:WP:BLP
1339:Enigma
704:Bastie
695:Splash
625:Alerts
247:scale.
126:Google
1369:WP:EL
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1650:talk
1631:talk
1528:true
1479:talk
1462:talk
1430:talk
1396:talk
1377:talk
1371:. --
1359:talk
1326:talk
1312:talk
1292:talk
1264:talk
1248:Toon
1236:talk
1220:Toon
1208:talk
1191:talk
1175:talk
1149:Toon
1127:talk
1070:talk
826:this
810:talk
718:talk
691:here
313:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1565:RfC
1542:).
1530:or
1515:to
1090:·:·
1084:·:·
1026:·:·
1020:·:·
1001:·:·
995:·:·
979:VNN
927:·:·
921:·:·
877:·:·
871:·:·
693:. -
651:Low
519:Low
414:Low
198:BLP
176:TWL
1664::
1652:)
1633:)
1578:.
1573:}}
1569:{{
1540:}}
1536:{{
1481:)
1464:)
1398:)
1379:)
1361:)
1328:)
1314:)
1294:)
1266:)
1202:.
1193:)
1185:--
1177:)
1129:)
1076:).
1072:•
812:)
720:)
156:)
54:;
1648:(
1629:(
1610:)
1606:(
1593:.
1586:.
1477:(
1460:(
1394:(
1375:(
1357:(
1324:(
1310:(
1290:(
1262:(
1234:(
1206:(
1189:(
1173:(
1125:(
1068:(
808:(
776:-
716:(
663:.
531:.
426:.
321:.
253::
221:.
196:(
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
