1022:
which itself is appealable. If the Court of Appeal finds some reason for why fugitive disentitlement should not apply and issues a writ of mandate overturning the trial court's ruling, then
Polanski can then force the trial court to hear whatever motion or writ he wants to present to challenge his original plea bargain and sentence. If the Court of Appeal affirms the trial court's ruling, then Polanski can't do anything until he is extradited through the appropriate channels and remanded to the custody of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to serve his original sentence. Once back on California soil, he's under the jurisdiction of the California courts and can, in turn, challenge their jurisdiction over him through a collateral attack, a writ for
955:
they are supposed to be deciding. In this case, the handling of
Polanski's case is relevant to the fugitive disentitlement doctrine because his lawyers need to convince the judges to allow him some narrow exception to the doctrine based on the alleged misconduct in the lower court. In turn, the judges need to pose hypotheticals about what Polanski could have or should have done in response to the alleged misconduct, in order to force his lawyers to clarify the exact dimensions of the very narrow exception to fugitive disentitlement which the judges would need to adopt to grant him the relief he seeks. But it's easy for laypersons and journalists to mistake such hypos for actual advice. --
1075:
Britain, and have the same or similar system to
Britain. I am always reluctant to make interlinks to this article, because it is too specific. Take a look at the corresponding French article. Not only is it more inclusive (like many French articles compared to their corresponding English version), it is also short and to the point. Major differences are stubbed with a link to the main article. Perhaps that the way to go rather than writing a book on the USA appeal system.
1018:
affirmed on appeal. So why waste a jury's time? Anyway, after an MSJ is granted, the party denied a trial (usually the plaintiff) then appeals and asks the appellate court to reverse and remand for trial. If a MSJ is denied, then a case proceeds to trial, and the parties almost always settle on the eve of trial, unless there are millions of dollars at stake that would justify the typical investment of $ 100,000 (or higher) to put on a show for the jury.
74:
53:
84:
22:
1017:
issue of disputed factual evidence for them to decide---indeed, there's no evidence at all. The idea is that if you can't support one element of your case, the rest of it becomes irrelevant. Each and every element must be supported by factual evidence in the record for a jury's final judgment to be
1004:
as a matter of law. That is, the plaintiff must be able to present admissible evidence in support of each and every required element of his case. If the plaintiff, after sufficient time for discovery, can't present such evidence, then there's no need for a trial. The reason is that during a trial,
954:
all the time at oral argument. They'll throw out weird hypothetical situations, that is, legal curve balls, just to try to knock an attorney off balance. The point is to force the advocates to sharpen and refine the exact legal points they're making, which in turn helps the judges figure out what
934:
rape case, the news is that the justices of the 2nd
Circuit here in L.A. are giving advice and suggestions about the handling of Polanski's case, and how he could avoid jail time. Is this proper? Nothing in the article suggests that this is within the job description scope of a U.S. appeals court.
1021:
In this case, Polanski is appealing the trial court's refusal to hear his case on the merits because of the fugitive disentitlement doctrine. The court issued an adverse ruling basically saying "I'm not going to hear you because you fled the jurisdiction and failed to cooperate with the court,"
1074:
or something like that, because it only deals with the US judicial system and not a worldwide view of the subject. It is surprising that since the tag was added in 2010, nothing has been done to rectify the problem. I contribute to
African related article, some of which were former colonies of
871:
I'd like to add something to this article about the comparative authority of appellate courts - it is my understanding that in countries like China and Iran, the appellate courts can do basically whatever they want, whereas in most common law and civil law systems their powers of review are
285:
995:
trial and the decision refusing to allow a trial is itself a final adverse judgment that is appealable. For example, a huge number of reported appellate cases today (probably almost two-thirds) are based on the grant of
1026:. Though even then, that will be extremely difficult because judges are sick and tired of reading frivolous habeas petitions from prisoners who have nothing to do all day but draft frivolous petitions. --
585:
660:
1233:
1229:
1215:
893:
As long as it isn't original research. If you can find some book or law review article that actually stands for that proposition, then by all means, go ahead. --
815:
That has been done with respect to appeals court. Court of
Appeals remains a separate article, for reasons which seem reasonable if you review the article.
780:
776:
950:
No, they were discussing hypothetical situations in order to evaluate whether the fugitive disentitlement doctrine applies to him. Appellate judges play
1191:
784:
360:
630:
969:
OK, layperson here. This one thought that Courts of Appeal are created for the purpose of appealing the result of a lower court ruling. That is,
136:
162:
as in india, also there are various courts which function as appellate court. Supreme court for high courts and high courts for session courts
1300:
126:
1090:
Anyone is free to add information about appellate courts in other countries. The article is far too short, rather than being too long.
1305:
1295:
1211:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1201:
615:
33:
1129:
1276:
735:
450:
315:
97:
58:
1192:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110718133821/http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/court%20of%20appeals
1139:
Well, that's the jargon that lawyers use. You may have a point that the terminology is a bit confusing, but under
705:
220:
Additionally, there are some other articles which may be able to linked to this one (also known as "backlinks"):
175:
1232:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1125:
768:: The article text has not been changed in any way; Some of these suggestions may be wrong, some may be right.
39:
21:
1195:
1267:
1183:
1147:, it simply follows what's already established. For better or worse, "appellate" simply means that a court
330:
101:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
1121:
1049:
982:
940:
345:
991:
But if a court dismisses a case before trial, or refuses to hear the case for some reason, then there is
1251:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1239:
1071:
854:
720:
540:
435:
420:
225:
1182:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1045:
978:
936:
1156:
1031:
960:
808:
1124:. Appellate court sounds as if a court poses appeals or a simplified version of a court of appeal.
1041:
600:
495:
240:
270:
191:
1236:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1202:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150709111738/http://applawyers.org/Civil_Appeals_Guide_Revised.pdf
973:
a case has gone to trial. Are you saying that the court is open to petitions and oral arguments
1252:
951:
675:
1080:
771:
480:
465:
1100:
1010:
1005:
at the end of plaintiff's case-in-chief, the defense would be able to move successfully for
997:
912:
882:
847:
804:
207:
167:
1259:
1140:
1175:
1152:
1027:
956:
894:
858:
835:
758:
743:
728:
713:
698:
683:
668:
653:
638:
623:
608:
593:
578:
563:
548:
533:
518:
503:
488:
473:
458:
443:
428:
413:
398:
383:
368:
353:
338:
323:
308:
293:
278:
263:
248:
233:
179:
1205:
1218:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
931:
816:
690:
555:
510:
300:
1258:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1225:
1289:
1023:
800:
750:
1151:
appeals, as opposed to hearing evidence or legal argument in the first instance. --
1076:
788:
902:
I was sort of hoping to plumb for anyone with knowledge of such a source. Cheers!
73:
52:
1091:
903:
873:
570:
375:
286:
Eddie Mabo & Ors v The State of
Queensland and The Commonwealth of Australia
198:
163:
83:
1224:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
839:
525:
405:
89:
79:
645:
255:
1196:
http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/court%20of%20appeals
390:
1281:
1160:
1133:
1105:
1084:
1053:
1035:
986:
964:
944:
917:
897:
887:
861:
819:
212:
171:
1006:
1117:
831:
427:: ...lbert architect (1896-1901) *"Justice, Power, & Study," US
190:: ...ourt — has already made some decision, which at least
581:
to overturn the lower court decision — is responsible...
159:
757:: ...of Victoria in 1992 and was later elevated to the Victorian
742:: ...''Supreme Court of North Carolina''' is the state's highest
727:: ... date, there has been no review of this type of claim by an
712:: ... never presented to the jury. It was also never heard by an
697:: ...tion, Gardella lost at the trial court level, but a Federal
682:: ...ate prosecutor who in turn will represent the county in the
667:: ...ecommendations included creation of an independent civilian
637:: ...ed only limited parental rights litigation went through the
622:: ...s as are created by law. (2) The Supreme Court is the final
592:: ... judges, the First Circuit is the nation's smallest federal
577:: ...etitioner or appellant]], who is attempting to convince the
547:: ... the eleven wall and two ceiling murals for the Supreme and
532:: ...more significant cases to the appropriate state and federal
517:: ...ealth, and Bessie's being a prostitute, was influencing the
502:: ...ense and Education Fund * Hon. Stephen Trott 1962 - Federal
487:: ...als was petitioned to hear the case; the Court, the highest
472:: ...rs of the Royal Government, among them the President of the
457:: ...case is also significant as it is the first time an federal
442:: ...came president of the Göta Hovrätt, or lord justice for the
367:: ...e a Lord of Appeal. In recent years, a judge of an overseas
352:: ...ed on the British model; the highest court of appeal is the
337:: ...e Privy Council of the United Kingdom serves as the highest
322:: ... power to regulate interstate commerce. Most of the initial
292:: ...marises the Mabo decision to the 1995 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL
277:: ... into being and have been reinforced in a long tradition of
262:: ...s due to the excessive publicity surrounding the case. The
247:: ...led on the U.K. system. The Court of Appeals is the highest
232:: ...cial courts try broadly defined national security cases. An
1013:, meaning the case would never go to the jury because there is
731:, meaning that the superior courts cannot look to an appella...
521:. One newspaper editorial bitterly wrote, "Certainly all tha...
476:, the Chancellor and the Castle Hauptmann of Stettin, overin...
311:; it numbers seven justices. the [[North Carolina Court of A...
194:
to the action wants to challenge based upon some legal grou...
701:
found in his favour. In order to prevent an appeal before t...
641:
where
Gertrude Whitney won. As a result, a devastated Glori...
566:
Nominating
Commission (1978-1992, was Chairman in 1990), Te...
536:
reporters, as well as to various law reviews and journals w...
491:
in Texas for criminal matters, denied review. The case then...
416:
to a lower court, on condition that there was no legal basi...
386:
for the First
District of Illinois; he returned to the Cook...
356:
of the Supreme Court. At the local government level, the co...
326:
decisions reached the same conclusion, finding the Act unco...
281:
decisions because of a perceived need to protect the rights...
251:
in Jamaica. Under certain circumstances, cases may be appea...
236:
system and the court of cassation (court of last recourse) ...
102:
15:
1040:
Thanks. This info is helpful, so I've copied it over to the
1186:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
412:: ...ogative writ]]s. It is a ] that sends a case from an
382:: ... In ] he was appointed by the Supreme Court to the
1179:
746:. Numbering seven justices, its current members are:...
1206:
http://applawyers.org/Civil_Appeals_Guide_Revised.pdf
652:: ...story.jsp?story=535734 (The Independent)] * A ]
686:
with the advice and consent of the State's Attorney.
586:
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1228:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
661:
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
656:rules 2-1 that a will presented by ] of her abd...
1000:to one side or the other, meaning by definition,
799:Any thoughts on why we shouldn't merge this with
197:No good; completely different sense of the word.
830:A lot of this information should probably be in
371:(the Court of Appeal of ]) has served as a Lo...
178:has some possible wiki link suggestions for the
1116:How can a court be appellate? A court can hear
1214:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
461:in the United States has invoked the ] of...
266:agreed and ruled that his motion for a ] ...
19:
872:substantially more limited. Any thoughts?
855:Talk:Court of Appeals#Rename this article?
431:House, NYC, James Lord architect (1900)...
158:There has to some information specific to
47:
1174:I have just modified 2 external links on
977:to a trial? A kind of "what if?" game?
361:Judicial functions of the House of Lords
176:automated Knowledge (XXG) link suggester
1066:Article does not deal with the subject.
631:Gloria Laura Mercedes Morgan-Vanderbilt
49:
1070:This article should be renamed to the
834:, either instead of or in addition to
551:Rooms of the ] Building in [[Sprin...
7:
926:US Appeals court gives legal advice?
95:This article is within the scope of
105:and the subjects encompassed by it.
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
1178:. Please take a moment to review
1002:there is no triable issue of fact
562:: ...h include the ], Tennessee
401:has ] to issue ''mandamus'' t...
82:
72:
51:
20:
853:Please see my move proposal at
616:Constitution of Fiji: Chapter 9
307:: ... ] is the state's highest
131:This article has been rated as
111:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law
1:
1161:20:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
1134:19:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
1054:19:56, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
1036:19:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
987:20:11, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
965:22:55, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
945:21:36, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
888:18:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
862:19:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
607:: ...f Congress * , New York
1301:High-importance law articles
918:09:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
898:06:43, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
736:North Carolina Supreme Court
451:Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin
397:: ...e ] has ruled that the
316:National Labor Relations Act
842:11:04, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
213:05:56, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
1322:
1245:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1171:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
137:project's importance scale
1106:03:32, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
1085:00:00, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
811:17:55, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
706:United States v. LaRouche
446:of ]. From ], ] to ], ...
172:12:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
130:
67:
46:
1306:WikiProject Law articles
1296:Start-Class law articles
1282:02:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
820:22:42, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
791:11:29, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
114:Template:WikiProject Law
1167:External links modified
331:Politics of the Bahamas
1122:appellate jurisdiction
846:Regarding the article
346:Politics of Bangladesh
28:This article is rated
867:Comparative authority
721:Buchwald v. Paramount
541:Albert Henry Krehbiel
506:judge, 9th Circuit...
436:Louis Gerhard De Geer
421:Daniel Chester French
154:Automated suggestions
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1226:regular verification
785:Please don't link to
296:JUDGES CONFERENCE...
1216:After February 2018
1126:Aleksandr Grigoryev
601:Frederick Ruckstull
496:Wesleyan University
241:Politics of Jamaica
1270:InternetArchiveBot
1221:InternetArchiveBot
1143:, Knowledge (XXG)
1120:and work under an
1072:USA Appelate court
1044:discussion page.
826:A different merge?
271:Legal technicality
34:content assessment
1246:
481:Lawrence v. Texas
466:Swedish Pomerania
151:
150:
147:
146:
143:
142:
1313:
1280:
1271:
1244:
1243:
1222:
1112:Appellate court?
1098:
1011:directed verdict
998:summary judgment
952:devil's advocate
910:
880:
848:Court of Appeals
805:Court of Appeals
676:State's Attorney
626:of the State....
226:Politics of Iraq
205:
119:
118:
115:
112:
109:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1321:
1320:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1286:
1285:
1274:
1269:
1237:
1230:have permission
1220:
1184:this simple FaQ
1176:Appellate court
1169:
1114:
1092:
1068:
928:
904:
874:
869:
851:
836:Appellate court
828:
809:PullUpYourSocks
797:
759:Court of appeal
755:Court of appeal
753:, can backlink
744:appellate court
740:appellate court
738:, can backlink
729:appellate court
725:appellate court
723:, can backlink
714:appellate court
710:appellate court
708:, can backlink
699:appellate court
695:appellate court
693:, can backlink
684:appellate court
680:appellate court
678:, can backlink
669:appellate court
665:appellate court
663:, can backlink
654:appellate court
650:appellate court
648:, can backlink
639:Court of appeal
635:Court of appeal
633:, can backlink
624:appellate court
620:appellate court
618:, can backlink
609:Appellate Court
605:Appellate Court
603:, can backlink
594:appellate court
590:appellate court
588:, can backlink
579:appellate court
575:appellate court
573:, can backlink
564:Appellate Court
560:Appellate Court
558:, can backlink
549:Appellate Court
545:Appellate Court
543:, can backlink
534:appellate court
530:appellate court
528:, can backlink
519:appellate court
515:appellate court
513:, can backlink
504:Appellate Court
500:Appellate Court
498:, can backlink
489:appellate court
485:appellate court
483:, can backlink
474:Appellate Court
470:Appellate Court
468:, can backlink
459:appellate court
455:appellate court
453:, can backlink
444:appellate court
440:appellate court
438:, can backlink
429:Appellate Court
425:Appellate Court
423:, can backlink
414:appellate court
410:appellate court
408:, can backlink
399:appellate court
395:appellate court
393:, can backlink
384:Appellate Court
380:Appellate Court
378:, can backlink
369:appellate court
365:appellate court
363:, can backlink
354:Appellate Court
350:Appellate Court
348:, can backlink
339:appellate court
335:appellate court
333:, can backlink
324:appellate court
320:appellate court
318:, can backlink
309:appellate court
305:appellate court
303:, can backlink
288:, can backlink
279:appellate court
275:appellate court
273:, can backlink
264:appellate court
260:appellate court
258:, can backlink
249:appellate court
245:appellate court
243:, can backlink
234:appellate court
230:appellate court
228:, can backlink
199:
180:Appellate_court
156:
133:High-importance
116:
113:
110:
107:
106:
98:WikiProject Law
88:
81:
62:High‑importance
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1319:
1317:
1309:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1288:
1287:
1264:
1263:
1256:
1209:
1208:
1200:Added archive
1198:
1190:Added archive
1168:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1113:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1067:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1019:
932:Roman Polanski
927:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
868:
865:
850:
844:
827:
824:
823:
822:
796:
793:
769:
763:
762:
747:
732:
717:
702:
691:Danny Gardella
687:
672:
657:
642:
627:
612:
597:
582:
567:
556:Stanley Rogers
552:
537:
522:
511:Diamond Bessie
507:
492:
477:
462:
447:
432:
417:
402:
387:
372:
357:
342:
327:
312:
301:North Carolina
297:
282:
267:
252:
237:
218:
217:
216:
215:
155:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
141:
140:
129:
123:
122:
120:
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1318:
1307:
1304:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1293:
1291:
1284:
1283:
1278:
1273:
1272:
1261:
1257:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1241:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1217:
1212:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1172:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1145:does not lead
1142:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1111:
1107:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1097:
1096:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1073:
1065:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1024:habeas corpus
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1003:
999:
994:
990:
989:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
968:
967:
966:
962:
958:
953:
949:
948:
947:
946:
942:
938:
933:
925:
919:
916:
915:
911:
909:
908:
901:
900:
899:
896:
892:
891:
890:
889:
886:
885:
881:
879:
878:
866:
864:
863:
860:
856:
849:
845:
843:
841:
837:
833:
825:
821:
818:
814:
813:
812:
810:
806:
802:
801:Appeals court
794:
792:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
773:
767:
760:
756:
752:
751:Kenneth Hayne
748:
745:
741:
737:
733:
730:
726:
722:
718:
715:
711:
707:
703:
700:
696:
692:
688:
685:
681:
677:
673:
670:
666:
662:
658:
655:
651:
647:
643:
640:
636:
632:
628:
625:
621:
617:
613:
610:
606:
602:
598:
595:
591:
587:
583:
580:
576:
572:
568:
565:
561:
557:
553:
550:
546:
542:
538:
535:
531:
527:
523:
520:
516:
512:
508:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
486:
482:
478:
475:
471:
467:
463:
460:
456:
452:
448:
445:
441:
437:
433:
430:
426:
422:
418:
415:
411:
407:
403:
400:
396:
392:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
370:
366:
362:
358:
355:
351:
347:
343:
340:
336:
332:
328:
325:
321:
317:
313:
310:
306:
302:
298:
295:
291:
287:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
261:
257:
253:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
214:
211:
210:
206:
204:
203:
196:
195:
193:
189:
185:
184:
183:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
153:
138:
134:
128:
125:
124:
121:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1268:
1265:
1240:source check
1219:
1213:
1210:
1173:
1170:
1148:
1144:
1115:
1101:
1094:
1093:
1069:
1046:JohnClarknew
1014:
1001:
992:
979:JohnClarknew
974:
970:
937:JohnClarknew
929:
913:
906:
905:
883:
876:
875:
870:
852:
829:
798:
770:
765:
764:
754:
739:
724:
709:
694:
679:
664:
649:
634:
619:
604:
589:
574:
559:
544:
529:
514:
499:
484:
469:
454:
439:
424:
409:
394:
379:
364:
349:
334:
319:
304:
289:
274:
259:
244:
229:
219:
208:
201:
200:
187:
157:
132:
117:law articles
96:
40:WikiProjects
761:in 1995....
571:Brief (law)
376:Joseph Gary
103:legal field
30:Start-class
1290:Categories
1277:Report bug
1153:Coolcaesar
1028:Coolcaesar
957:Coolcaesar
895:Coolcaesar
859:Mathew5000
526:Sid McMath
406:Procedendo
90:Law portal
1260:this tool
1253:this tool
817:Ellsworth
781:I hate it
777:I like it
646:June 2004
294:APPELLATE
290:APPELLATE
256:Jack Ruby
192:one party
188:one party
186:Can link
182:article:
1266:Cheers.—
1042:Polanski
772:Feedback
391:Mandamus
1180:my edit
1118:appeals
1077:Tamsier
1007:nonsuit
930:In the
789:LinkBot
135:on the
1141:WP:NOR
1095:bd2412
907:bd2412
877:bd2412
832:Appeal
807:? --
795:Merge?
202:bd2412
164:Ntu129
36:scale.
1149:hears
1009:or a
975:prior
971:after
840:Surgo
766:Notes
716:. ...
160:India
1157:talk
1130:talk
1081:talk
1050:talk
1032:talk
983:talk
961:talk
941:talk
857:. --
803:and
671:....
596:....
341:....
168:talk
127:High
1234:RfC
1204:to
1194:to
749:In
734:In
719:In
704:In
689:In
674:In
659:In
644:In
629:In
614:In
611:...
599:In
584:In
569:In
554:In
539:In
524:In
509:In
494:In
479:In
464:In
449:In
434:In
419:In
404:In
389:In
374:In
359:In
344:In
329:In
314:In
299:In
284:In
269:In
254:In
239:In
224:In
174:An
108:Law
59:Law
1292::
1247:.
1242:}}
1238:{{
1159:)
1132:)
1083:)
1052:)
1034:)
1015:no
993:no
985:)
963:)
943:)
838:.
787:—
783:,
779:,
775::
170:)
1279:)
1275:(
1262:.
1255:.
1155:(
1128:(
1102:T
1079:(
1048:(
1030:(
981:(
959:(
939:(
914:T
884:T
209:T
166:(
139:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
