656:
Q, then they would have the same features and performance. Can you give any good reason why WinTel should not be mentioned? Are you the final arbiter of which virtualization solutions get mention in wikipedia, so that you can exclude WinTel just because you don't like them? You're obviously biased against WinTel and toward Q. I don't use either, nor any other virtualization solution, and I don't see any reason why WinTel should not be mentioned in the article. And so far, all you seem to have come up with is that you don't like the WinTel developers because you think they ripped off Q. If there is some kind of dispute about that, it belongs in the Q or WinTel articles, not here. Merely deleting any reference to WinTel because you don't like them is called "censorship". I guess it's not possible to have even one NPOV article on wikipedia, even on a technical subject. wikipedia is such a sham; you can have it.
353:
256:
332:
235:
847:
421:
204:
577:"We have a commitment to understanding what VPC will look like on the Intel Mac. But until we have the final hardware we can't know what Virtual PC will look like on those machines," Lefebvre said. "There are dependencies with the OS and the hardware. Until we know what the final hardware is like, it's difficult to know how it will work," she concluded."
1022:
What sources can be found that it's called Apple-Intel architecture, and moreover "Mactel." I found a few publications referring to it as such, but never anything official from Apple. In fact, it seems Apple prefers to gloss over CPU architecture entirely, which makes sense given their status amongst
896:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
655:
No. You still haven't given any reason why WinTel should not be mentioned in this article. It is not "Q repackaged", but it is based off of some of the same code. Q has a different set of features than WinTel, while WinTel has superior performance. If WinTel was simply a commercial repackaging of
486:
article on whether the machine would run other operating systems than Mac OS X (like
Windows), such a discussion really belongs in a general article since both the new iMac and MacBook Pro share a very similar setup hardware wise, so anything running on one of them almost certanly can run to at least
1002:
The only difference is that Apple allows macOS itself to run as a guest on some hypervisors, such as VMware Fusion and
Parallels Workstation; other than that, it's pretty much the same type of virtualization you can get on Windows and Linux and, for some hypervisors, other OSes. I'm not sure why it
665:
I can see no reason to exclude a particular product, though
Knowledge (XXG) isn't a catalogue. One key point, however, is that this WinTel thing doesn't have a Knowledge (XXG) article, while Q does. References to things with articles are always preferable. Of course, that does lead to the suggestion
719:
There is nothing wrong with creating a GUI for an open source product. However some people think that if you take someone else's work and sell it, that you should give something back to the people who did the actual work. OpenOSX give nothing back, and they only credits the people whose work they
620:
OpenOSX WinTel and Q are both ports of QEMU. OpenOSX WinTel is sold under the GPL, according to their website. Since your assertion that "OpenOSX WinTel is just Q renamed" is false, I'm putting the mention back in the article. If you think that OpenOSX is doing something wrong in their marketing
829:
I wasn't very impressed by this article I was hoping to find something about Intel Macs but found an article largely about BootCamp - ie windows on macs Intel Macs and
Windows running on a Mac are not the same thing (Intel Macs came first btw) - they could even be separate articles as they're not
609:
Can you prove that? And even if it's true, does that mean that people reading the wikipedia article should not allowed to be aware of its existence? I'd bet that whoever owns OpenOSX probably would dispute your claim (I have no idea if it's true or not). It's a virtualization solution that's
682:
All they have done is create a GUI that configures and launches Qemu. Specifically the version of QEMU ported to Mac OS X, otherwise known as "Q", hence the line "Special thanks to Gwenolé Beauchesne for his excellent Intel port of
Fabrice Bellard's fast Qemu opensource virtual
518:
has Apple's computers running the WIndows version of
Photoshop better than 'designed for Windows' equivalent PC notebooks. I don't think a separate article is necessary. After all, there is no 'Linux on Mac hardware' article, even though there are
534:
I have been thinking of removing most of that section; seems to me that it can be replaced with something short like "By installing
Windows XP on a Macintosh, users who want/need to run both operating systems can do so using a single computer".
166:
705:
I may just be misattributing quotes, but didn't you say "not even credit for their work", and now you indicate that their web site gives two specific credits? And what is wrong with creating a GUI for an open source product?
921:
Discussion of BootCamp and Dont Steal Mac OS X.kext seems irrelevant to the computer architecture. The only relevant parts seem to be EFI and GUID tables, and even those are just subsets of standard Intel PC architecture.
940:
Removed most of the irrelevant fluff. If there's any salient technical differences between an Intel
Machintosh and a standard x86 PC, feel free to add. I figure OS X copy-protection should be discussed elsewhere.
759:
I agree with this Amit Singh is a respected researcher and have covered Mac OS X indepth. I've changed the article accordingly, if anyone has a good reference showing the TPM is used by Apple please provide it.
679:
Perhaps you could try reading their website, "WinTel is our popular Cocoa graphical user interface used to control the included powerful underlying open-source "Qemu" x86 virtualization/emulation software."
430:
1085:
552:
That whole section should go - there is a BootCamp page it links to with all the relevant information and a discussion about the benefits of multi-booting is important doesn't belong here either.
925:
Also most of the Google results for "Apple-Intel architecture" seem to point to copies of this page. Is there any proof that Apple ever actually used this as a term? Or is the whole premise OR?
893:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with
Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
160:
637:
people. OpenOSX do give credit. On their website "Special thanks to Gwenolé Beauchesne for his excellent Intel port of
Fabrice Bellard's fast Qemu opensource virtual machine."
57:
1080:
435:
457:
should there be some discussion of the branding of Intel on Apple computers? all Dells ship with Intel stickers on the case and box, do Apple computers now have the same?
732:
So is Knowledge (XXG) policy to only list free software, but not commercial packaging of that software we don't approve of? This discussion is full of moral judgements.
314:
411:
92:
1055:
304:
1075:
1070:
666:
that there be an article created for the other software; if there are properly sourced criticisms of its provenance, that is the place to document them.
401:
874:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
871:
814:, so they joined for reasons that are a consequence of switching to x86. I'm not sure it's all that strong an argument for its inclusion, however....
695:
They all agree that Wintel does NOT have superior performance. They all agree that Wintel is just Q repackaged (previously it was Bochs repackaged).
898:
890:
886:
863:
1060:
280:
98:
377:
810:
and 2) they did it either because you can run Windows on an Intel Mac (native or in emulation) or because the hardware is more comparable with
181:
902:
676:
Aranhamo, perhaps you should read up on the subject first. You said "It is not Q repackaged, but it is based off of some of the same code."
148:
488:
1050:
960:
774:
43:
501:"Being able to use software that is designed only for, works faster on, or is more intuitive on Mac OS X (for example, Adobe Photoshop)."
1065:
942:
926:
263:
240:
360:
337:
112:
606:"OpenOSX WinTel is just Q renamed and sold without giving anything back to the original developer, not even credit for their work."
621:
of WinTel, maybe you should add a mention to the Q article, or create a WinTel article (since it looks like there isn't one yet).
117:
33:
142:
750:
Amit Singh not only claims that the latest Mac models don't have a TPM chip, but that Apple never actually used it for anything.
87:
1090:
215:
773:
early on that TPM was used--as the article now states--does not appear to be dubious, as it was widely rumored and believed.
138:
78:
279:
and related topics on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
37:
188:
986:
122:
482:
I created this article to discuss the Apple-Intel architecture in general, there had been some discussion on the
778:
221:
154:
1032:
930:
946:
691:
508:
1. it is not designed only for osx 2. it does NOT work faster on osx 3. it is not any more intuitive on osx
1027:
I considered emailing Apple about this directly, but I cannot find an applicable address on their website.
882:
854:
373:
68:
983:
723:
696:
646:
376:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
859:
792:
Bapco (and un disambiguated link) is in See Also - what has this to do with Apple-Intel? Is it spam? --
83:
1008:
835:
858:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
203:
908:
174:
1028:
761:
516:
1036:
1012:
989:
950:
934:
911:
818:
796:
782:
764:
754:
736:
726:
710:
699:
670:
660:
649:
625:
614:
595:
585:
556:
543:
527:
511:
I would suggest putting Final Cut Pro or Logic in there instead, and have amended accordingly.
491:
471:
461:
998:
In what way is virtualization on a Mac different from virtualization on any other x86 machine?
811:
458:
64:
807:
733:
707:
667:
520:
693:
1004:
831:
815:
468:
875:
573:
stated that they will port Virtual PC to Intel Macs. The linked article actually says:
793:
769:
Perhaps the Dubious tag should be removed and the discuss tag left behind. That it was
540:
487:
some extent on the other (and this'll apply even more as more machines are released). —
272:
846:
1044:
657:
622:
611:
592:
582:
524:
581:
That's a long way from a commitment to release an Intel-Mac version of Virtual PC.
751:
748:
553:
689:
641:
483:
420:
352:
331:
255:
234:
591:
Microsoft made a commitment today - to no longer develop Virtual PC for Mac.
268:
721:
632:
688:
If you still don't believe me how about reading some reviews of the product.
536:
369:
966:
IMHO the article's existence is justified, but its lead sentence is not.
365:
967:
974:
article mentioned "Apple-Intel architecture" but I think the term has
505:
I take issue with this, I think Photoshop is a bad example because:
635:
870:
Knowledge (XXG) article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
978:
become "an unofficial name". It would probably suffice just to
634:
BTW I was getting the WinTel people confused with the IEmulator
631:
The OpenOSX people are notorious for doing this kind of thing.
276:
197:
28:
15:
684:
680:
638:
845:
419:
806:
the theory is that 1) Apple is one of the members of the
717:
173:
1086:
C-Class Computer hardware articles of Mid-importance
364:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
267:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
901:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
187:
959:The deleted stuff was restored on 16 June 2010 by
569:Contrary to what the article says, Microsoft has
46:for general discussion of the article's subject.
497:Running operating systems other than Mac OS X
8:
891:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
842:Fair use rationale for Image:Core2duomac.jpg
720:sell because people complained repeatedly.
326:
229:
1081:Mid-importance Computer hardware articles
716:Yup I said that, then I corrected myself.
610:available, so it should be mentioned.
328:
231:
201:
289:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Apple Inc.
386:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
7:
358:This article is within the scope of
261:This article is within the scope of
1056:High-importance Apple Inc. articles
220:It is of interest to the following
36:for discussing improvements to the
1076:C-Class Computer hardware articles
14:
1071:Low-importance Computing articles
63:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
889:. Using one of the templates at
351:
330:
254:
233:
202:
58:Click here to start a new topic.
1061:WikiProject Apple Inc. articles
406:This article has been rated as
309:This article has been rated as
292:Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.
903:Media copyright questions page
640:Beauchesne's work went into Q.
389:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
872:boilerplate fair use template
755:17:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
428:This article is supported by
380:and see a list of open tasks.
283:and see a list of open tasks.
55:Put new text under old text.
1037:19:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
1003:deserves a discussion here.
917:Why does this article exist?
912:12:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
899:criteria for speedy deletion
737:10:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
492:16:06, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
431:Computer hardware task force
1051:C-Class Apple Inc. articles
963:and has since been revised.
951:05:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
727:21:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
711:18:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
700:17:59, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
671:10:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
661:07:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
650:22:25, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
626:19:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
615:19:36, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
1107:
1066:C-Class Computing articles
980:rewrite the lead paragraph
935:06:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
883:the image description page
783:14:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
596:21:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
586:19:09, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
557:14:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
544:08:10, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
528:01:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
412:project's importance scale
315:project's importance scale
885:and edit it to include a
472:01:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
462:22:41, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
427:
405:
346:
308:
249:
228:
93:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:Skip to table of contents
1013:01:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
990:16:24, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
864:explanation or rationale
765:22:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
521:commercial organizations
38:Apple–Intel architecture
21:
819:02:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
802:I disambiguated it. I
797:01:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
743:Trusted Platform Module
489:Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
1091:All Computing articles
850:
424:
374:information technology
264:WikiProject Apple Inc.
210:This article is rated
88:avoid personal attacks
866:as to why its use in
855:Image:Core2duomac.jpg
849:
423:
361:WikiProject Computing
214:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
113:Neutral point of view
1018:Sources for the name
830:technically related
747:In a recent article
523:that support this.
118:No original research
295:Apple Inc. articles
887:fair use rationale
851:
812:IBM PC compatibles
425:
392:Computing articles
216:content assessment
99:dispute resolution
60:
515:Heck, One report
450:
449:
446:
445:
442:
441:
325:
324:
321:
320:
196:
195:
79:Assume good faith
56:
27:
26:
1098:
862:but there is no
808:BAPCo consortium
724:AlistairMcMillan
697:AlistairMcMillan
647:AlistairMcMillan
467:No, they don't.
394:
393:
390:
387:
384:
355:
348:
347:
342:
334:
327:
297:
296:
293:
290:
287:
258:
251:
250:
245:
237:
230:
213:
207:
206:
198:
192:
191:
177:
108:Article policies
29:
16:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1041:
1040:
1023:the community.
1020:
1000:
982:accordingly. -
919:
844:
827:
825:Intel ≠ Windows
790:
745:
604:
567:
499:
480:
455:
391:
388:
385:
382:
381:
340:
311:High-importance
294:
291:
288:
285:
284:
244:High‑importance
243:
211:
134:
129:
128:
127:
104:
74:
12:
11:
5:
1104:
1102:
1094:
1093:
1088:
1083:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1043:
1042:
1026:
1019:
1016:
999:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
964:
961:192.102.209.29
954:
953:
918:
915:
909:BetacommandBot
843:
840:
826:
823:
822:
821:
789:
786:
775:24.117.141.119
744:
741:
740:
739:
714:
713:
674:
673:
663:
629:
628:
603:
600:
599:
598:
579:
578:
566:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
547:
546:
531:
530:
504:
498:
495:
479:
476:
475:
474:
454:
451:
448:
447:
444:
443:
440:
439:
436:Mid-importance
426:
416:
415:
408:Low-importance
404:
398:
397:
395:
378:the discussion
356:
344:
343:
341:Low‑importance
335:
323:
322:
319:
318:
307:
301:
300:
298:
281:the discussion
259:
247:
246:
238:
226:
225:
219:
208:
194:
193:
131:
130:
126:
125:
120:
115:
106:
105:
103:
102:
95:
90:
81:
75:
73:
72:
61:
52:
51:
48:
47:
41:
25:
24:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1103:
1092:
1089:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1048:
1046:
1039:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1029:Silvanathecat
1024:
1017:
1015:
1014:
1010:
1006:
997:
991:
988:
985:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
962:
958:
957:
956:
955:
952:
948:
944:
943:71.134.252.36
939:
938:
937:
936:
932:
928:
927:64.171.162.74
923:
916:
914:
913:
910:
906:
905:. Thank you.
904:
900:
894:
892:
888:
884:
881:Please go to
879:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
856:
848:
841:
839:
837:
833:
824:
820:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
800:
799:
798:
795:
787:
785:
784:
780:
776:
772:
767:
766:
763:
757:
756:
753:
749:
742:
738:
735:
731:
730:
729:
728:
725:
722:
718:
712:
709:
704:
703:
702:
701:
698:
694:
692:
690:
686:
685:
681:
677:
672:
669:
664:
662:
659:
654:
653:
652:
651:
648:
643:
642:
639:
636:
633:
627:
624:
619:
618:
617:
616:
613:
607:
601:
597:
594:
590:
589:
588:
587:
584:
576:
575:
574:
572:
564:
558:
555:
551:
550:
549:
548:
545:
542:
538:
533:
532:
529:
526:
522:
517:
514:
513:
512:
509:
506:
502:
496:
494:
493:
490:
485:
477:
473:
470:
466:
465:
464:
463:
460:
452:
437:
434:(assessed as
433:
432:
422:
418:
417:
413:
409:
403:
400:
399:
396:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
362:
357:
354:
350:
349:
345:
339:
336:
333:
329:
316:
312:
306:
303:
302:
299:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
265:
260:
257:
253:
252:
248:
242:
239:
236:
232:
227:
223:
217:
209:
205:
200:
199:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
133:
132:
124:
123:Verifiability
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
100:
96:
94:
91:
89:
85:
82:
80:
77:
76:
70:
66:
65:Learn to edit
62:
59:
54:
53:
50:
49:
45:
39:
35:
31:
30:
23:
20:
18:
17:
1025:
1021:
1001:
979:
975:
971:
924:
920:
907:
895:
880:
867:
853:
852:
828:
803:
791:
770:
768:
758:
746:
715:
687:
678:
675:
644:
630:
608:
605:
580:
570:
568:
510:
507:
503:
500:
481:
459:Romansanders
456:
429:
407:
359:
310:
262:
222:WikiProjects
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
107:
32:This is the
734:Notinasnaid
708:Notinasnaid
668:Notinasnaid
645:Happy now?
484:MacBook Pro
478:New article
161:free images
44:not a forum
1045:Categories
1005:Guy Harris
832:Stonysleep
816:Guy Harris
565:Virtual PC
469:Guy Harris
286:Apple Inc.
241:Apple Inc.
984:Fayenatic
972:Economist
794:LeedsKing
788:BapCo ??!
683:machine."
383:Computing
370:computing
366:computers
338:Computing
101:if needed
84:Be polite
34:talk page
876:fair use
860:fair use
658:Aranhamo
623:Aranhamo
612:Aranhamo
593:Aranhamo
583:Aranhamo
525:Ehurtley
453:Branding
69:get help
42:This is
40:article.
771:thought
752:Lars T.
602:OpenOSX
554:DamienG
410:on the
313:on the
212:C-class
167:WP refs
155:scholar
987:(talk)
804:assume
762:New299
372:, and
218:scale.
139:Google
970:2005
269:Apple
182:JSTOR
143:books
97:Seek
1033:talk
1009:talk
968:This
947:talk
931:talk
868:this
836:talk
779:talk
541:talk
537:Thue
305:High
175:FENS
149:news
86:and
976:not
571:not
402:Low
277:iOS
273:Mac
189:TWL
1047::
1035:)
1011:)
949:)
933:)
878:.
838:)
781:)
539:|
438:).
368:,
275:,
271:,
169:)
67:;
1031:(
1007:(
945:(
929:(
834:(
777:(
414:.
317:.
224::
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
71:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
