286:
265:
1094:, a work which grossly mischaracterized several aspects of psychology in order to attempt to legitimize a link between race and intelligence which the mainstream of intelligence research had largely abandoned by that point. That same editor is the one you subsequently quote. The mainstream view of intelligence according to every reputable neurologist, psychologist, psychiatrist and cultural anthropologist I have ever spoken to or read the works of is that environmental factors play a role which overwhelms any hereditary role.
440:
598:
577:
493:
472:
719:
692:
608:
378:
354:
203:
234:
908:
503:
826:: Knowledge users are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously in their interactions with other users; to approach even difficult situations in a dignified fashion and with a constructive and collaborative outlook; and to avoid acting in a manner that brings the project into disrepute. Unseemly conduct, such as
806:. Accordingly, it is not the appropriate venue for advocacy or for advancing a specific point of view. While coverage of all significant points of view is a necessary part of balancing an article, striving to give exposure to minority viewpoints that are not significantly expressed in reliable secondary sources is not.
388:
1114:
Hmm, the quote pulled from the cited source says "The article itself became one of the most highly cited in the history of psychology, but many of the citations were rebuttals of Jensen's arguments or used the paper as an example of controversy." It sounds like we should use the word "rebuttals", but
1132:
to me, though I couldn't find any compiled list of these. The term seems to be fairly obscure and mainly used in philosophy of language. Is there a standard
Knowledge policy on dealing with success words when describing arguments back and forth on an issue without implicitly assuming who is right
955:
Im too lazy to correct it myself, but the page says "heritability measures the percentage of variation of a trait due to inheritance, within a population." This is not true. Heritability measures variance attributable to genes either within or between groups. The "criticism" here is that Jensen
1060:
I also strongly recommend that any student interested in pursuing a career in intelligence research using neuroscience or other approaches read Jensenâs 1969 article. It is often cited, often misrepresented, and in my view, a classic work of psychology that still suggests important ideas and
1176:
I agree, but it is safe to say that Jensen's views in the 1969 article were never debunked in that sense. Almost every point he put forward in the 1969 article is now mainstream opinion according to textbooks and expert surveys.
1035:
Which seems to me like a NPOV violation as well as being false. Jensen's views are well accepted according to multiple surveys of experts. Almost everything he argued for in the 1969 paper is now the mainstream opinion (see e.g.
1166:
Generally the policy is to fairly represent the reliable sources. I think it's OK to show that something has been "debunked" if we can show some kind of consensus of sources that says that. Otherwise I would avoid the word.
153:
1266:
454:
778:. In particular, analyses or conclusions not already published in reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy are not appropriate for inclusion in articles.
1181:: the mainstream moved to his positions. Only the hypothesis about genetic causation of the US Black-White gap remains contentious with authors rarely taking an affirmative stance in public,
1261:
1246:
326:
889:
738:
336:
843:
736:, along with other articles relating to the area of conflict (namely, the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, broadly construed), is currently subject to
970:
Why wouldn't it be? Given the controversial nature of Jensen's research and conclusions, I don't think it is beyond the pale to juxtapose it with criticism from a prominent source. --
1251:
449:
364:
302:
1241:
194:
1271:
1065:
The book contains 7 citations to Jensen's works, including the 1969 paper. Given the above, if not contested, I will revert to the NPOV wording again within a few days.
147:
986:
I believe that the source for this assertion is not from a very NPOV source, I wouldn't say Jensen ranks among the most eminent psychologists of the 20th century.
293:
270:
992:
You might what to find a third party source for support. Otherwise, it appears that you've done nothing but state your own 'point of view' - at least twice.
816:
are expected to contribute neutrally instead of following their own agenda and, in particular, should take care to avoid creating the impression that their
1301:
1286:
702:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, which is a contentious topic.
670:
660:
559:
549:
79:
1306:
1291:
1134:
1276:
406:
301:, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
888:
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the full
636:
525:
85:
44:
1296:
1281:
410:
1178:
1256:
1089:
414:
788:
and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources. Primary sources are permitted if used carefully. All interpretive claims, analyses, or
405:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
621:
582:
516:
477:
401:
359:
99:
30:
104:
20:
1048:). Reading mainstream textbooks on the topic also reveals that Jensen's work is well-cited and well-regarded. For instance,
168:
1182:
1031:
more NPOV wording (debunking is a success word, i.e. implies success of the action, whereas rebuttal or criticism does not)
1086:
is an almost-walled-garden of racialist (read: racist) thought and it's editor is well-known as one of the signatories of
827:
135:
74:
705:
699:
245:
190:
835:
65:
202:
185:
983:"Jensen is both among the most eminent psychologists of the twentieth century and a highly controversial figure."
820:
is non-neutral, which could strongly suggest that their editing is not compatible with the goals of this project.
213:
1103:
298:
129:
1138:
109:
1185:. This is also my experience with in talking to researchers in private. I will thus change the wording to
1081:
933:
285:
264:
125:
251:
1129:
956:
supposedly derives emperical conclusions about between-group heritability FROM within group h2 values.
1041:
1037:
839:
175:
233:
1096:
1012:
941:
881:
161:
55:
635:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
524:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
873:
831:
218:
70:
963:
439:
1023:
If academics do not accept Jensen's work (and they don't), then the debunkings WERE successful.
940:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
613:
508:
51:
1212:
1194:
1157:
1070:
1049:
971:
920:
393:
215:
768:) are not negotiable and cannot be overruled, even when apparent consensus to do so exists.
141:
892:. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first.
743:
described in a 2010 Arbitration
Committee case where the articulated principles included:
857:
853:
803:
785:
751:
1235:
1204:
1168:
1116:
877:
869:
865:
817:
813:
789:
733:
24:
691:
793:
764:
759:
776:"facts, allegations, ideas, and stories not already published by reliable sources"
597:
576:
1208:
1190:
1153:
1066:
861:
755:
492:
471:
792:
about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than to
377:
353:
631:
626:
603:
521:
498:
383:
1115:
not the word "debunking", if we're going to fairly represent the source. â
1080:
The frontiers publications are fringe publications, not accepted science.
297:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
217:
928:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
1216:
1198:
1171:
1161:
1119:
1109:
1074:
1045:
1183:
though anonymous surveys find that it too is quite mainstream belief
962:
Is the criticism section from Gould supposed to be in this article?-
1042:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608000305
413:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1038:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00399/full
902:
713:
686:
227:
219:
15:
717:
438:
1267:
Mid-importance biography (science and academia) articles
625:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
1016:
160:
1044:, as well as the special issue about Jensen in 1998
796:
of the primary-source material by
Knowledge editors.
520:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
868:); or to evade procedural restrictions such as the
1262:B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
1247:High-importance University of California articles
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1061:hypotheses to test with modern methods. (p. 74)
856:. Tag-team editing â to thwart core policies (
311:Knowledge:WikiProject University of California
1252:WikiProject University of California articles
1141:)? Other non-success and thus NPOV nouns are
314:Template:WikiProject University of California
174:
8:
774:: Knowledge defines "original research" as
728:Arbitration Ruling on Race and Intelligence
571:
466:
348:
259:
1242:B-Class University of California articles
1272:Science and academia work group articles
784:: Knowledge articles should be based on
880:over articles; or otherwise to prevent
573:
468:
350:
261:
231:
852:: Tag teams work in unison to push a
786:reliable, published secondary sources
7:
932:] The anchor (#Test bias) has been
619:This article is within the scope of
514:This article is within the scope of
399:This article is within the scope of
294:WikiProject University of California
291:This article is within the scope of
1046:http://arthurjensen.net/?page_id=11
872:or to violate behavioural norms by
450:the science and academia work group
250:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1302:Low-importance California articles
1287:Mid-importance psychology articles
1128:is better. It doesn't seem like a
1090:Mainstream Science on Intelligence
762:. Those founding principles (the
14:
317:University of California articles
1054:The Neuroscience of Intelligence
906:
690:
645:Knowledge:WikiProject California
606:
596:
575:
534:Knowledge:WikiProject Psychology
501:
491:
470:
386:
376:
352:
284:
263:
232:
201:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1307:WikiProject California articles
1292:WikiProject Psychology articles
1007:NPOV violation with "debunking"
665:This article has been rated as
648:Template:WikiProject California
554:This article has been rated as
537:Template:WikiProject Psychology
423:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
331:This article has been rated as
1277:WikiProject Biography articles
1052:wrote in his 2017 textbook on
802:: Knowledge strives towards a
426:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
1179:Jensen pointed it out in 1998
750:: Knowledge articles must be
639:and see a list of open tasks.
528:and see a list of open tasks.
447:This article is supported by
305:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1019:with the following reason.:
999:References for removed image
411:contribute to the discussion
1297:B-Class California articles
1282:B-Class psychology articles
1207:has already made the edit.
884:prevailing â is prohibited.
739:active arbitration remedies
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1323:
1257:B-Class biography articles
1217:03:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
1199:03:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
1172:05:23, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
1162:04:13, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
1120:02:57, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
1110:22:18, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
1075:21:54, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
1027:My remark on my edit was:
966:06:04, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
671:project's importance scale
560:project's importance scale
337:project's importance scale
876:; or to attempt to exert
664:
591:
553:
486:
446:
371:
330:
279:
258:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
974:00:48, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
854:particular point of view
836:assumptions of bad faith
308:University of California
299:University of California
271:University of California
844:disruptive point-making
814:Single purpose accounts
810:Single purpose accounts
934:deleted by other users
782:Correct use of sources
722:
622:WikiProject California
517:WikiProject Psychology
443:
240:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1105:Tell me all about it.
890:arbitration case page
858:neutral point of view
804:neutral point of view
758:and must not contain
721:
442:
402:WikiProject Biography
195:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
1203:Oh, turned out that
866:no original research
365:Science and Academia
105:No original research
708:and edit carefully.
704:Please consult the
651:California articles
540:psychology articles
818:focus on one topic
723:
700:contentious topics
444:
429:biography articles
246:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1106:
948:
947:
923:in most browsers.
899:
898:
870:three revert rule
794:original analysis
772:Original research
760:original research
712:
711:
685:
684:
681:
680:
677:
676:
614:California portal
570:
569:
566:
565:
509:Psychology portal
465:
464:
461:
460:
347:
346:
343:
342:
226:
225:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1314:
1189:as agreed upon.
1108:
1104:
1101:
942:Reporting errors
910:
909:
903:
850:Tag-team editing
846:, is prohibited.
828:personal attacks
790:synthetic claims
720:
714:
694:
687:
653:
652:
649:
646:
643:
616:
611:
610:
609:
600:
593:
592:
587:
579:
572:
542:
541:
538:
535:
532:
511:
506:
505:
504:
495:
488:
487:
482:
474:
467:
431:
430:
427:
424:
421:
407:join the project
396:
394:Biography portal
391:
390:
389:
380:
373:
372:
367:
356:
349:
319:
318:
315:
312:
309:
288:
281:
280:
275:
267:
260:
243:
237:
236:
228:
220:
206:
205:
196:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1232:
1231:
1097:
1095:
1009:
1001:
981:
953:
944:
926:
925:
924:
907:
895:
894:
729:
718:
650:
647:
644:
641:
640:
612:
607:
605:
585:
539:
536:
533:
530:
529:
507:
502:
500:
480:
428:
425:
422:
419:
418:
392:
387:
385:
362:
333:High-importance
316:
313:
310:
307:
306:
274:Highâimportance
273:
244:on Knowledge's
241:
222:
221:
216:
193:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1320:
1318:
1310:
1309:
1304:
1299:
1294:
1289:
1284:
1279:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1259:
1254:
1249:
1244:
1234:
1233:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1063:
1062:
1033:
1032:
1025:
1024:
1013:MPants at work
1008:
1005:
1003:
1000:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
980:
977:
976:
975:
959:
952:
949:
946:
945:
939:
938:
937:
921:case-sensitive
915:
914:
913:
911:
897:
896:
886:
885:
847:
821:
807:
797:
779:
769:
730:
727:
726:
724:
710:
709:
695:
683:
682:
679:
678:
675:
674:
667:Low-importance
663:
657:
656:
654:
637:the discussion
618:
617:
601:
589:
588:
586:Lowâimportance
580:
568:
567:
564:
563:
556:Mid-importance
552:
546:
545:
543:
526:the discussion
513:
512:
496:
484:
483:
481:Midâimportance
475:
463:
462:
459:
458:
455:Mid-importance
445:
435:
434:
432:
398:
397:
381:
369:
368:
357:
345:
344:
341:
340:
329:
323:
322:
320:
303:the discussion
289:
277:
276:
268:
256:
255:
249:
238:
224:
223:
214:
212:
211:
208:
207:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1319:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1300:
1298:
1295:
1293:
1290:
1288:
1285:
1283:
1280:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1270:
1268:
1265:
1263:
1260:
1258:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1248:
1245:
1243:
1240:
1239:
1237:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1170:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1133:(not exactly
1131:
1127:
1124:I agree that
1123:
1122:
1121:
1118:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1102:
1100:
1093:
1091:
1085:
1084:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1055:
1051:
1050:Richard Haier
1047:
1043:
1039:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1018:
1014:
1006:
1004:
998:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
984:
978:
973:
969:
968:
967:
965:
960:
957:
950:
943:
935:
931:
930:
929:
922:
918:
912:
905:
904:
901:
893:
891:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
862:verifiability
859:
855:
851:
848:
845:
841:
837:
833:
829:
825:
822:
819:
815:
811:
808:
805:
801:
798:
795:
791:
787:
783:
780:
777:
773:
770:
767:
766:
761:
757:
753:
749:
746:
745:
744:
742:
740:
735:
734:Arthur Jensen
725:
716:
715:
707:
703:
701:
696:
693:
689:
688:
672:
668:
662:
659:
658:
655:
638:
634:
633:
628:
624:
623:
615:
604:
602:
599:
595:
594:
590:
584:
581:
578:
574:
561:
557:
551:
548:
547:
544:
527:
523:
519:
518:
510:
499:
497:
494:
490:
489:
485:
479:
476:
473:
469:
456:
453:(assessed as
452:
451:
441:
437:
436:
433:
416:
415:documentation
412:
408:
404:
403:
395:
384:
382:
379:
375:
374:
370:
366:
361:
358:
355:
351:
338:
334:
328:
325:
324:
321:
304:
300:
296:
295:
290:
287:
283:
282:
278:
272:
269:
266:
262:
257:
253:
247:
239:
235:
230:
229:
210:
209:
204:
200:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
25:Arthur Jensen
22:
18:
17:
1186:
1149:
1146:
1142:
1130:success word
1125:
1099:áááááŸáá±Pants
1098:
1087:
1083:Intelligence
1082:
1064:
1053:
1034:
1026:
1010:
1002:
985:
982:
961:
958:
954:
927:
919:Anchors are
916:
900:
887:
874:edit warring
849:
823:
809:
799:
781:
775:
771:
763:
747:
737:
732:The article
731:
697:
666:
630:
620:
555:
515:
448:
400:
332:
292:
252:WikiProjects
198:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1017:my revision
972:Fastfission
148:free images
31:not a forum
1236:Categories
840:harassment
832:incivility
756:verifiable
706:procedures
642:California
632:California
627:U.S. state
583:California
531:Psychology
522:Psychology
478:Psychology
1150:rejoinder
1143:criticism
1015:reversed
882:consensus
878:ownership
420:Biography
360:Biography
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1205:NPalgan2
1187:rebuttal
1169:Ashley Y
1147:response
1126:rebuttal
1117:Ashley Y
979:Eminent?
951:Untitled
800:Advocacy
199:200Â days
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
936:before.
824:Decorum
765:Pillars
752:neutral
748:Pillars
669:on the
558:on the
335:on the
242:B-class
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1209:Deleet
1191:Deleet
1154:Deleet
1067:Deleet
1056:that:
864:, and
248:scale.
126:Google
1011:User
964:Grick
842:, or
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1213:talk
1195:talk
1158:talk
1139:here
1135:here
1071:talk
1040:and
917:Tip:
698:The
409:and
327:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1137:or
661:Low
629:of
550:Mid
176:TWL
1238::
1215:)
1197:)
1160:)
1152:.
1145:,
1073:)
860:,
838:,
834:,
830:,
812::
754:,
457:).
363::
197::
156:)
54:;
1211:(
1193:(
1167:â
1156:(
1092:"
1088:"
1069:(
741:,
673:.
562:.
417:.
339:.
254::
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
