1017:
search for the actual cause. Garnayev and his fellow test pilot put themselves at the very likely risk of death in order to replicate the cause of the crash; all in the name of safety to the aviation industry and the people who utilise this essential service. The investigation was conducted over a period of many months with many hours of tests required. This is standard in the aviation industry, and if the authorities did not conduct investigations properly they will soon be made to answer for it. On one hand we have an internationally recognised aviation authority which conducted an investigation into the crash, and we have a highly decorated
Russian test pilot replicating the conditions which caused the crash. On the other hand we have 2 people with an obvious axe to grind, who are not aviation experts, coming up with a multitude of conspiracy theories on the crash; and media who made all sorts of speculation within hours of the crash (as per the norm). Whilst there are conspiracy theories, they need to dealth with as per
963:. Unfortunately Garnayev was killed when the M-101T he was undertaking test flights on crashed; of course, this was also likely an assassination due to him knowing about Putin eating babies for breakfast. Not everything is a conspiracy Biophys, and Garnayev was successfully able to recreate the conditions which caused the Yak-40 crash at Sheremetyevo -- and the recreation of these conditions was in itself a high-risk venture for Garnayev. Additionally, I could easily introduce into the article a report by Izvestia that said that Borovik was in the cockpit during the fatal moments, and that he was responsible for the crash; but I won't do this, because I don't care for unproven speculation in an encyclopaedia, I prefer proven facts over anything else. --
576:
1181:
offered
Borovik a seat on the aircraft and the crew requested permission to start the engines at 8:28am. The crew did not ask for permission to enter the taxiway, which was done at too high a speed for the icy conditions, and the flaps were set to 11°, instead of 20°. The aircraft reached a speed of 165km/h, when the crew began to rotate the aircraft, at which stage it reached a 13° angle of attack, and stalled 8-10 metres off the ground, and reached a height of 63 metres, before crashing.
1098:
offered
Borovik a seat on the aircraft and the crew requested permission to start the engines at 8:28am. The crew did not ask for permission to enter the taxiway, which was done at too high a speed for the icy conditions, and the flaps were set to 11°, instead of 20°. The aircraft reached a speed of 165km/h, when the crew began to rotate the aircraft, at which stage it reached a 13° angle of attack, and stalled 8-10 metres off the ground, and reached a height of 63 metres, before crashing.
344:
467:
432:
334:
310:
240:
222:
191:
1298:отчёте по результатам исследования динамики взлёта самолёта Як-40Д RA-88170 отметил, что учитывая сходимость характеристик самолёта Як-40Д RA-88170, полученных в аварийном полёте, с характеристиками самолёта Як-40Д RA-98114, на котором проводились специальные лётные испытания, можно сделать вывод о том, что взлёт самолёта Як-40Д RA-88170 выполнялся при отсутствии льда на поверхности крыла."
477:
692:
I'll tell you what is the most likely result...the aircraft will stall, and due to not having enough speed, lift and altitude, it will crash into the ground. It's all covered in the reports. But you are inconveniently removing that information. We are to present information and let readers decide for themselves. You however, are making that decision for them. That's called
556:
596:
250:
1021:. Biophys, also, you have not answered many of the most pertinent questions which have been raised above, so in order for this to be discussion to progress, as I have answered your questions at every turn, you have not answered my valid concerns with the article, and I am requesting that this be done. --
1351:
Claiming that investigation results are contraversial just because official investigation contains dissenting opinion from one man who opines that crash was due to engine malfunction is nonsense. All US Supreme Court decision were also contraversial if they have dissenting opinions? Both main opinion
764:
We are discussing the article content, and the article content is not acceptable because it is yourself you who poisoning NPOV by presenting prominently only your POV. Unfortunately, we can't discuss the article content without discussing your actions, and your motives behind them. Whilst I know what
691:
Also, tell me, what happens if an aircraft is travelling at 165km/h, has flaps at 11° instead of 20° (20° being necessary to create the necessary amount of lift on the Yak-40 at the correct speed) and the pilots take off too early because they have not taken into account the incorrect flaps settings?
1180:
The investigation into the crash by the
Interstate Aviation Committee revealed whilst snow was removed from the aircraft exterior, de-icing fluid was not applied. The aircraft was due to depart at 8:00am in the morning of 9 March 2000, however, due to Borovik's planned flight being delayed, Bazhayev
1097:
The investigation into the crash by the
Interstate Aviation Committee revealed whilst snow was removed from the aircraft exterior, de-icing fluid was not applied. The aircraft was due to depart at 8:00am in the morning of 9 March 2000, however, due to Borovik's planned flight being delayed, Bazhayev
734:
That is not how things are done
Biophys, and you know it. What is in the article is YOUR POV, with everyone else thrown in the footnotes; let's face it, a lot of people will only read the text in the article proper and not even look at footnotes; so what people don't see is that he was an unplanned
1336:
Agree. I will bring a secondary source (a book) later. You probably did not see recent documentary about
Borovik at Russian TV. Most of the people involved in the case agree that the crash was actually an assassination, but the opinions differed on the matter who was actually targeted (Borovik or
1297:
The results of official commission were controversial. Please see this: "Эту точку зрения разделяют не все члены комиссии. Один из членов комиссии приложил к окончательному отчёту особое мнение. Государственный центр "Безопасность полётов на воздушном транспорте" (ГЦ БП ВТ) в научно-техническом
1016:
In terms of aviation accidents, and a lot of things in general, official reports the majority of the time do not refer to conspiracy theories propagated by individuals with an axe to grind. Aviation accidents in particular work from possible theories and work to eliminate possible causes in the
735:
addition to the flight; which somewhat farts on the conspiracy theory that you have presented. What you are doing is a great disservice to this article, especially as only fringe conspiracy theories are allowed to shine thru. I'm not getting into an edit war with you on this, I will ask other
1185:
into the footnotes, instead of it being in the article proper? The external links were removed by myself as they are simply news articles written within 24 hours of the crash, which provide nothing to the article that isn't already in the referenced BBC news article - please refer to
986:
I have protected article for a week to facilitate dialogue on the talk page rather than edit war. IMHO the conspirological version should be mentioned but the official version of the aviation authorities should be given the most weight. Izvestia version could be mentioned as well
900:
on the grounds of the fringe conspiracy theories it presents. The newspaper publications were from within 24 hours after the crash, so one expects such things as purple aliens as being responsible to be printed (and they just fell short of blaming aliens). And I have added
654:
for a reason
Biophys), and your introduced sources on not needing de-icing fluids is not absolutely correct, as the requirements for such things is not only defined by the "apparent weather". You have provided 2 vehemently anti-Putin sources (in an attempt to
1352:
and dissenting opinion do not confirm that crash was provoked or organized. You have distorted original source meaning by stating it was contraversial and injected
Original research about de-icing. Sorry, but such wording cannot stand by any WP standarts.
677:
and present only fringe, tin foil hat theories in your drive to demonise whoever and whatever. Enough is enough. I will be seeking further comment on this from uninvolved editors....of course, I expect you to call them
585:
446:
153:
605:
450:
673:
paranoid theories, is impossible, because you seem to insist on hiding it. I am here to help build an encyclopaedia in a NPOV way, you however, as evident by your edits to this article are here to
1056:
You have not answered the question
Biophys; that being, why did you remove information from the article proper and hide it in footnotes, yet left only speculative nuttery in the article proper? --
750:
Sorry man, but instead of discussing this article subject, you accuse me personally of something that I never did. This is not the way to go. On the other hand, asking 3rd opinions is a good idea.
565:
442:
1390:
1237:
For example, "According to publication, Putin lived in Georgia between the ages of three and nine." (!!!) Very informative passage in the AB article. And more... Hence, WP:NEU and WP:NPOV
1440:
1435:
798:
OK, I separated facts/official conclusions in allegations to different sections. I also restored deleted references in the end of article. Now everything is included in NPOV fashion.
1420:
1450:
1445:
147:
1301:
Most important, we should not do our own analysis of primary sources, such as original Russian documents by aviation commissions. Please use reliable secondary sources.
905:
sources, and the information has been hidden into footnotes. Your NPOV edits need to be reverted. And I am also not sure about your sneaky introduction of potential
882:
This is published by two well known experts (both have WP article about them). If their version was disputed, you are welcome to include the corresponding materials.
1430:
1425:
769:. Information presented into the article does not belong in the footnotes, it belongs in the article proper. That is one of the BIG problems with this article. --
667:, not from journalists who couldn't tell a wing from flaps, flaps from ailerons, etc. But of course, for this information to be displayed as prominently as your
414:
79:
1400:
404:
546:
268:
1405:
856:
I don't think it's a "compromise" version, Biophys. You push gossips (ok, conspiracy theories) with making separate sections. This is unacceptable.
366:
85:
1415:
1385:
1380:
536:
272:
44:
1455:
1410:
1395:
1223:
The problem is WP:NEU. Speculations only (with consequent speculations on third persons like yeh Puten) do not deserve a separate section.
955:. Garnayev being a decorated test pilot in the USSR and then Russia, whose expertise was widely acknowledged within aviation circles. Also
390:
30:
512:
267:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
357:
315:
276:
650:
information in the references, you have totally misconstrued proper aviation terminologies (and hence their meaning) (my name is Russ
263:
227:
99:
1208:
of his death and speculations about his death to separate sections. All information was kept. What's wrong with it? Please explain.
104:
20:
1034:
included, both in text and in footnotes. I also separated facts and accusations to separate sections, which is the way to go per
813:
What you have done is to have only conspiracy in the article and everything else thrown into footnotes which no-one reads. It is
74:
1042:
sources (a book published by notable experts) than anything else. No one ever disputed this "conspiracy theory" as you call it.
508:
490:
437:
202:
707:
I have reverted the changes made to the article in order to include ALL theories. This is the only way to balance out POV. --
168:
65:
135:
660:
1141:
it was you who repeatedly deleted the entire list of sources (external links), as anyone can see in the end of this diff
1316:
Stating that the results of the official commission is controversial, in the article, without a source saying so, is
109:
1256:
1242:
1228:
861:
129:
682:
members as you do me. Perhaps you need to step back a bit and look at your edits from others points of view. --
495:
208:
190:
1324:
992:
982:
None of these sources ever mentioned the version by Felshtinsky and Pribylovsky.05:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
125:
1357:
1190:
on what should and shouldn't be in that section. Anyway, I would like an answer to the question above. --
55:
365:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1342:
1306:
1278:
1213:
1148:
1070:
1047:
1007:
942:
887:
847:
803:
755:
725:
636:
70:
175:
1252:
1238:
1224:
857:
818:
694:
674:
656:
575:
161:
1338:
1302:
1274:
1209:
1144:
1066:
1043:
1003:
938:
883:
843:
838:(a book), and a couple of newspaper publications. If you want to balance this article, please add
799:
751:
721:
632:
1273:
Fixed. I removed this as separate section and placed the remotely relevant segment to a footnote.
988:
1018:
668:
1321:
1353:
349:
51:
1320:. Additionally, a reliable secondary source is already being used in the article, that being
1112:
from the article proper and hid it in the footnotes/references section. Why was this done? --
1035:
396:
255:
141:
906:
822:
766:
1317:
1187:
960:
24:
1217:
1374:
1328:
1191:
1113:
1057:
1022:
964:
910:
826:
770:
740:
708:
699:
683:
631:
What was the reason for deleting/reverting my perfectly sourced text? Please explain.
482:
679:
935:
Please provide at least one source that specifically disputes this "fringe theory"
466:
431:
952:
718:
All your materials have been included in the text: 11° instead of 20°, and so on
239:
221:
472:
362:
339:
333:
309:
245:
951:
Well the official investigation for a start. Then there's Aleksandr Garnayev
956:
817:
NPOV, and surely you have to see that. This is now getting to the stage of
1251:
Biophys, the best way for you to end the conflict is to make self-revert.
842:
sourced information, instead of removing something that you do not like.
555:
1361:
1346:
1331:
1310:
1282:
1260:
1246:
1232:
1194:
1152:
1116:
1074:
1060:
1051:
1025:
1011:
996:
967:
946:
913:
891:
865:
851:
829:
807:
773:
759:
743:
729:
711:
702:
686:
640:
595:
663:, MAA, Aviation-Safety.net, and can provide a heap more sources from
499:
507:
Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
275:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
399:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
395:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
184:
15:
1002:
Sure, I support to include any reliably sourced information.
594:
574:
554:
659:
against Putin....surprise, surprise), yet I have provided
720:. In addition, they have been also included in footnotes.
1168:
1164:
1160:
1137:
646:
It's yourself who has some explaining to do. You have
160:
361:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1136:. Please compare my and your version in this diff:
174:
825:, and I will continue to challenge you on this. --
1391:B-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
1038:. The "accusation section" was sourced to better
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1441:Politics and law of Russia task force articles
1436:Start-Class Russia (politics and law) articles
1337:Bazhaev) and who was behind the assassination.
937:. If you can not, this is not a fring theory.
8:
188:
1421:Low-importance Start-Class Russia articles
426:
304:
216:
1171:. So I will now ask the question for the
586:the politics and law of Russia task force
1451:Mass media in Russia task force articles
1446:Start-Class Russia (mass media) articles
1030:All sourced information provided by you
765:your motives are, they are bordering on
428:
306:
218:
375:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Journalism
1431:Economy of Russia task force articles
1426:Start-Class Russia (economy) articles
1134:No, I did not remove this information
285:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography
7:
488:This article is within the scope of
355:This article is within the scope of
261:This article is within the scope of
606:the mass media in Russia task force
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1401:Low-importance Journalism articles
521:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Russia
397:project-independent quality rating
14:
1065:I did not remove any information.
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
566:the economy of Russia task force
475:
465:
430:
342:
332:
308:
248:
238:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1406:WikiProject Journalism articles
541:This article has been rated as
409:This article has been rated as
378:Template:WikiProject Journalism
1416:Low-importance Russia articles
1386:WikiProject Biography articles
1381:Start-Class biography articles
288:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
1283:00:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
1261:23:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
1247:22:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
1233:22:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
1218:22:21, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
739:editors for their opinion. --
661:Interstate Aviation Committee
603:This article is supported by
583:This article is supported by
563:This article is supported by
369:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1199:
1195:05:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
1153:04:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
1117:03:52, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
1075:03:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
1061:03:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
1052:20:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
1026:10:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
1012:06:00, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
997:05:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
968:19:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
947:16:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
914:05:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
892:05:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
866:05:08, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
852:05:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
830:05:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
808:04:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
774:01:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
760:17:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
744:17:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
730:16:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
712:12:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
703:17:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
687:17:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
641:16:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
273:contribute to the discussion
1456:WikiProject Russia articles
1411:Start-Class Russia articles
1396:B-Class Journalism articles
524:Template:WikiProject Russia
1472:
1362:04:29, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
1079:You removed the following:
737:members of the web brigade
547:project's importance scale
415:project's importance scale
1347:12:51, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
1332:06:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
1311:00:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
836:reliable secondary source
716:Please look at the text.
602:
582:
562:
540:
498:dedicated to coverage of
460:
408:
394:
327:
233:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1175:time. Why did you place:
1325:Aviation Safety Network
511:, or contribute to the
1183:
1083:
909:information either. --
665:aviation professionals
599:
579:
559:
358:WikiProject Journalism
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1178:
1082:
598:
578:
558:
264:WikiProject Biography
201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
502:on Knowledge (XXG).
105:No original research
1200:What's the problem?
1139:. To the contrary,
834:This is based on a
381:Journalism articles
896:I would challenge
794:Compromise version
600:
580:
560:
513:project discussion
491:WikiProject Russia
291:biography articles
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1318:original research
1167:was changed into
621:
620:
617:
616:
613:
612:
425:
424:
421:
420:
350:Journalism portal
303:
302:
299:
298:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1463:
529:
528:
525:
522:
519:
485:
480:
479:
478:
469:
462:
461:
456:
453:
447:Politics and law
434:
427:
383:
382:
379:
376:
373:
352:
347:
346:
345:
336:
329:
328:
323:
320:
312:
305:
293:
292:
289:
286:
283:
269:join the project
258:
256:Biography portal
253:
252:
251:
242:
235:
234:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1471:
1470:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1371:
1370:
1295:
1253:Beatle Fab Four
1239:Beatle Fab Four
1225:Beatle Fab Four
1202:
858:Beatle Fab Four
796:
629:
527:Russia articles
526:
523:
520:
517:
516:
505:To participate:
481:
476:
474:
454:
440:
380:
377:
374:
371:
370:
348:
343:
341:
321:
318:
290:
287:
284:
281:
280:
254:
249:
247:
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1469:
1467:
1459:
1458:
1453:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1373:
1372:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1294:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1235:
1201:
1198:
1177:
1176:
1156:
1155:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1080:
984:
983:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
894:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
795:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
628:
625:
623:
619:
618:
615:
614:
611:
610:
601:
591:
590:
581:
571:
570:
561:
551:
550:
543:Low-importance
539:
533:
532:
530:
503:
487:
486:
470:
458:
457:
455:Low‑importance
435:
423:
422:
419:
418:
411:Low-importance
407:
401:
400:
393:
387:
386:
384:
367:the discussion
354:
353:
337:
325:
324:
322:Low‑importance
313:
301:
300:
297:
296:
294:
260:
259:
243:
231:
230:
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
25:Artyom Borovik
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1468:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1379:
1378:
1376:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1319:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1299:
1292:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1189:
1182:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1135:
1132:
1131:
1118:
1115:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1024:
1020:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
994:
990:
989:Alex Bakharev
981:
969:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
949:
948:
944:
940:
936:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
915:
912:
908:
904:
899:
895:
893:
889:
885:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
867:
863:
859:
855:
854:
853:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
832:
831:
828:
824:
820:
816:
812:
811:
810:
809:
805:
801:
793:
775:
772:
768:
763:
762:
761:
757:
753:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
742:
738:
733:
732:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
714:
713:
710:
706:
705:
704:
701:
697:
696:
690:
689:
688:
685:
681:
676:
672:
671:
666:
662:
658:
653:
649:
645:
644:
643:
642:
638:
634:
626:
624:
608:
607:
597:
593:
592:
588:
587:
577:
573:
572:
568:
567:
557:
553:
552:
548:
544:
538:
535:
534:
531:
514:
510:
506:
501:
497:
493:
492:
484:
483:Russia portal
473:
471:
468:
464:
463:
459:
452:
448:
444:
439:
436:
433:
429:
416:
412:
406:
403:
402:
398:
392:
389:
388:
385:
368:
364:
360:
359:
351:
340:
338:
335:
331:
330:
326:
317:
314:
311:
307:
295:
278:
277:documentation
274:
270:
266:
265:
257:
246:
244:
241:
237:
236:
232:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1354:Vlad fedorov
1300:
1296:
1205:
1204:I separated
1203:
1184:
1179:
1172:
1140:
1133:
1096:
1039:
1031:
985:
934:
902:
897:
839:
835:
814:
797:
736:
717:
693:
669:
664:
651:
647:
630:
622:
604:
584:
564:
542:
509:project page
504:
489:
410:
356:
262:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
680:web brigade
496:WikiProject
199:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
1375:Categories
819:WP:SOAPBOX
695:soapboxing
675:WP:SOAPBOX
657:WP:SOAPBOX
627:A question
451:Mass media
372:Journalism
363:journalism
316:Journalism
1323:from the
1293:The crash
1163:in which
1161:this diff
1159:Refer to
1040:secondary
953:link here
282:Biography
228:Biography
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1329:Russavia
1192:Russavia
1114:Russavia
1058:Russavia
1032:has been
1023:Russavia
1019:WP:UNDUE
965:Russavia
911:Russavia
898:reliable
827:Russavia
771:Russavia
741:Russavia
709:Russavia
700:Russavia
684:Russavia
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1339:Biophys
1303:Biophys
1275:Biophys
1210:Biophys
1145:Biophys
1067:Biophys
1044:Biophys
1036:WP:NPOV
1004:Biophys
939:Biophys
884:Biophys
844:Biophys
800:Biophys
752:Biophys
722:Biophys
633:Biophys
545:on the
443:Economy
413:on the
319:B‑class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
907:WP:BLP
823:WP:OWN
767:WP:OWN
670:fringe
648:hidden
518:Russia
500:Russia
438:Russia
205:scale.
126:Google
1206:facts
1188:WP:EL
1173:third
903:THREE
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1358:talk
1343:talk
1327:. --
1307:talk
1279:talk
1257:talk
1243:talk
1229:talk
1214:talk
1169:this
1165:this
1149:talk
1071:talk
1048:talk
1008:talk
993:talk
961:this
959:and
957:this
943:talk
888:talk
862:talk
848:talk
840:more
821:and
804:talk
756:talk
726:talk
698:. --
652:avia
637:talk
494:, a
271:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
815:not
537:Low
405:Low
176:TWL
1377::
1360:)
1345:)
1309:)
1281:)
1259:)
1245:)
1231:)
1216:)
1151:)
1073:)
1050:)
1010:)
995:)
945:)
890:)
864:)
850:)
806:)
758:)
728:)
639:)
449:/
445:/
441::
156:)
54:;
1356:(
1341:(
1305:(
1277:(
1255:(
1241:(
1227:(
1212:(
1147:(
1143:.
1069:(
1046:(
1006:(
991:(
941:(
886:(
860:(
846:(
802:(
754:(
724:(
635:(
609:.
589:.
569:.
549:.
515:.
417:.
391:B
279:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
