392:
300:
269:
368:
207:
538:
517:
238:
445:
424:
931:
1032:
I have started converting the big features list to prose and in the process removed some run-of-the-mill stuff (such as: copy-paste and undo exists, multi-platform support as that's in the infobox anyway) and moved some other stuff down to the version history. However, in the process I stumbled a bit
730:
An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it. A corporation is not notable merely because it owns notable subsidiaries. The organization or corporation itself must have been discussed in reliable independent sources for it to be considered notable.
733:
Aside from these sort of theoretical or policy arguments, there is a very practical reason for this: if we don't have refs that specifically discuss the company, its staff, history, location and so on, than we have nothing on which to base an article. If all your refs are about its products only,
995:
This spawned several forks, most prominently among them
Tenacity and Audacium. The company reversed course, falling back to error/crash reporting and optional update checking instead. As a result, the developers of the forks lost interest and sent their forks into an indefinite
803:
because that article is deleted, and so no info about the company or all the things related to muse group, muse hub, tenacity, etc. is written down somewhere, i just had to waste 1 hour combing thru various websites to find out that:
401:
283:
1160:
153:
731:
Examples: If a notable person buys a restaurant, the restaurant does not "inherit" notability from its owner. If a notable person joins an organization, the organization does not "inherit" notability from its member.
190:
770:
You are missing the point. That company is notable because there are third party refs that describe it. If all we had were refs about its vacuum cleaners, then we would not have an article on the company itself,
876:
While
Audacium had a release, it barely had any attention from users and developers (~600 issues/PRs for Tenacity vs ~100 for Audacium, vs ~2900 for Audacity) and the changes it did make were mostly superficial.
588:
1195:
1155:
578:
406:
1011:
I believe there must be some third-party articles that mention some of the most notable forks, but my research has so far been unsuccessful. Can anybody help and find some sources for this passage?
1098:
991:
I noticed the section of the article regarding forks had primary sources, but lacked secondary and tertiary sources. I'd like to bring them to attention to add some secondary and tertiary sources.
913:
has been archived and is now read only. During its brief life it only made superficial changes. I don't think that it can be considered sufficiently "notable" for inclusion in an encyclopedia.
1200:
554:
852:
No. Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia and incorporates history, not just a project's current status. If these forks need updating then they should be updated, but we don't erase history. -
1190:
1150:
545:
522:
1140:
774:
What refs do you have on the Muse Group? Do we have enough to start an article? If there are none then we can close out this discussion, because there is nothing to discuss. -
147:
1165:
702:
If an author has multiple best sellers, or an artist has multiple hit records, or a film company produces multiple blockbusters,... then surely that illustrates that the
1054:
Even the non-destructive editing thing is fairly standard, and the only reason it's worth mentioning here IMHO is that
Audacity didn't have these features for so long.
738:
is really the key. If you have third party refs that provide info on the company itself then we can create an article, if not then we can't. What do we have for refs? -
1057:
NB, I can't promise I'll have the time to implement feedback on this myself, but I thought having this discussion is going to be helpful for the future anyway. --
44:
198:
499:
629:
358:
79:
1180:
489:
1125:
881:
I'll concede that
Tenacity in particular is a different league to Sneedacity though - let me try to incorporate the section into the other history bits.
348:
1135:
382:
1185:
465:
85:
324:
837:
All listed derivatives are now out of development, with none of them seeming to have done any significant releases. Can the section be removed?
194:
1175:
30:
1033:
into the question of which features of
Audacity are important, which aren't and what's run-of-the-mill. In particular, I'm unsure about:
1120:
838:
1102:
452:
429:
1130:
307:
274:
99:
1077:
168:
377:
279:
104:
20:
135:
550:
74:
1170:
613:
Does anyone know where the Muse Group
Knowledge (XXG) article went to or did the shady company get it to "disappear" somehow?
249:
1145:
1076:
muse are globohomo. audacity is dead. "protected groups"? BS. Yeah, I know, this comment will be removed by globohomo (you).
1037:
Individual effects (change tempo, noise reduction, vocal reduction are directly mentioned, but a lot more could be mentioned)
65:
129:
873:
While
Tenacity had a lot of press attention, it never had a release and thus very clearly never amounted to anything.
618:
206:
185:
1001:
125:
109:
661:
391:
217:
918:
761:
715:
651:
255:
842:
175:
24:
1081:
1005:
725:
320:
1000:
References 63, 64 and 67 in this passage point to the repositories of each project. While this helps for
914:
757:
711:
647:
55:
1062:
886:
614:
553:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
464:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
323:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
70:
807:
muse group is probably a fake american/international company but actually owned by a russian company.
1014:
237:
1018:
461:
161:
141:
707:
976:
753:
646:
Is it not notable that the company has THREE notable apps that have articles on Knowledge (XXG)?
222:
870:
for never amounting to anything. One could argue this is the case for the other forks as well:
968:
51:
927:
That makes sense to me. At this point in history, I think that whole section needs trimming.
735:
1058:
882:
219:
665:
964:
943:
900:
857:
779:
743:
673:
637:
1008:
and decide which forks (and which events) are worth mentioning and which ones are not.
822:
1114:
972:
1106:
1085:
1066:
1022:
980:
947:
922:
904:
890:
861:
846:
826:
783:
765:
747:
724:
Nope, not at all. An article on the company has to stand on its own, in particular
719:
677:
655:
641:
622:
221:
961:
367:
299:
268:
939:
896:
853:
775:
739:
734:
then all you get is "this is a company that makes the following products...."
669:
633:
818:
316:
910:
312:
537:
516:
691:
If an artist is notable does not mean that all their albums are notable
457:
694:
If an author is notable does not mean that all their books are notable
688:
If a radio station is notable does mean all their programs are notable
444:
423:
756:
that is known only by association with a brand of vacuum cleaner ;-)
1040:
Whether or not any individual file type or plugin type is supported
685:
If a poet is notable does not mean that all their poems are notable
1161:
C-Class Free and open-source software articles of Mid-importance
231:
223:
15:
456:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable
390:
366:
967:
last year and, as of this week, development of Tenacity is
563:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Professional sound production
867:
160:
1196:
Mid-importance Professional sound production articles
1156:
Mid-importance Free and open-source software articles
752:
and yet Knowledge (XXG) has a lengthy article about
549:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
311:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
628:It was deleted as a non-notable company in June at
174:
1201:WikiProject Professional sound production articles
566:Template:WikiProject Professional sound production
664:. Just because a company has products that meet
630:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Muse Group
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
987:Sections lacking secondary and tertiary sources
1191:C-Class Professional sound production articles
1151:C-Class Free and open-source software articles
1043:Audio analysis using FFT (what audio analysis
810:tenacity is probably not as good as audacity?
8:
1141:C-Class software articles of Mid-importance
1166:All Free and open-source software articles
668:, doesn't mean the company itself does. -
511:
418:
263:
546:WikiProject Professional sound production
1099:2600:1700:ACA0:2E60:9132:1563:8F2D:FFC8
609:What happened to the Muse Group article
513:
420:
265:
235:
813:using audacity is still probably safe?
729:
569:Professional sound production articles
474:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Podcasting
800:wikipedia bullshit and 0 logic again.
699:but the inverse seems rather unsound:
333:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
7:
1004:, it makes it difficult to evaluate
543:This article is within the scope of
450:This article is within the scope of
305:This article is within the scope of
254:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1181:Top-importance podcasting articles
14:
1126:Low-importance Computing articles
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1136:Mid-importance software articles
1050:UI Themes and waveform colorways
929:
551:sound recording and reproduction
536:
515:
443:
422:
298:
267:
236:
205:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1186:WikiProject Podcasting articles
583:This article has been rated as
494:This article has been rated as
477:Template:WikiProject Podcasting
353:This article has been rated as
948:12:13, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
923:11:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
336:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
1107:23:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1002:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability
827:10:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
560:Professional sound production
557:and see a list of open tasks.
523:Professional sound production
468:and see a list of open tasks.
402:Free and open-source software
399:This article is supported by
375:This article is supported by
327:and see a list of open tasks.
284:Free and open-source software
42:Put new text under old text.
1086:18:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
784:17:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
766:17:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
748:15:29, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
720:14:56, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
678:13:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
656:09:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
1176:C-Class podcasting articles
682:I agree with the examples:
462:podcast-related information
1217:
1121:C-Class Computing articles
1067:14:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
1006:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
589:project's importance scale
500:project's importance scale
359:project's importance scale
1131:C-Class software articles
1047:doing FFT at some stage?)
1023:21:37, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
582:
531:
493:
438:
398:
374:
352:
293:
262:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
905:17:45, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
891:17:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
862:13:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
847:13:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
642:22:04, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
623:16:05, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
981:19:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
911:Tenacity fork on GitHub
25:Audacity (audio editor)
1171:All Computing articles
1095:Edit your own talking
453:WikiProject Podcasting
395:
371:
321:information technology
244:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1146:All Software articles
866:You yourself removed
706:subject has at least
394:
370:
308:WikiProject Computing
248:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
199:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
378:WikiProject Software
105:No original research
480:podcasting articles
754:The Hoover Company
396:
372:
339:Computing articles
250:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
603:
602:
599:
598:
595:
594:
510:
509:
506:
505:
417:
416:
413:
412:
230:
229:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1208:
937:
933:
932:
615:NantucketHistory
571:
570:
567:
564:
561:
540:
533:
532:
527:
519:
512:
482:
481:
478:
475:
472:
447:
440:
439:
434:
426:
419:
341:
340:
337:
334:
331:
302:
295:
294:
289:
286:
271:
264:
247:
241:
240:
232:
224:
210:
209:
200:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1216:
1215:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1111:
1110:
1093:
1074:
1030:
989:
962:Audacium merged
930:
928:
835:
662:WP:NOTINHERITED
611:
568:
565:
562:
559:
558:
525:
479:
476:
473:
470:
469:
432:
338:
335:
332:
329:
328:
287:
277:
245:
226:
225:
220:
197:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1214:
1212:
1204:
1203:
1198:
1193:
1188:
1183:
1178:
1173:
1168:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1128:
1123:
1113:
1112:
1092:
1089:
1073:
1070:
1052:
1051:
1048:
1041:
1038:
1029:
1026:
998:
997:
988:
985:
984:
983:
958:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
915:Stevethefiddle
879:
878:
877:
874:
834:
831:
830:
829:
816:
815:
814:
811:
808:
801:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
772:
758:Stevethefiddle
712:Stevethefiddle
700:
697:
696:
695:
692:
689:
686:
648:Stevethefiddle
610:
607:
605:
601:
600:
597:
596:
593:
592:
585:Mid-importance
581:
575:
574:
572:
555:the discussion
541:
529:
528:
526:Mid‑importance
520:
508:
507:
504:
503:
496:Top-importance
492:
486:
485:
483:
466:the discussion
448:
436:
435:
433:Top‑importance
427:
415:
414:
411:
410:
407:Mid-importance
397:
387:
386:
383:Mid-importance
373:
363:
362:
355:Low-importance
351:
345:
344:
342:
325:the discussion
303:
291:
290:
288:Low‑importance
272:
260:
259:
253:
242:
228:
227:
218:
216:
215:
212:
211:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1213:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1184:
1182:
1179:
1177:
1174:
1172:
1169:
1167:
1164:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1118:
1116:
1109:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1090:
1088:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1071:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1049:
1046:
1042:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1028:Features list
1027:
1025:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1003:
994:
993:
992:
986:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
965:with Tenacity
963:
959:
949:
945:
941:
936:
926:
925:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
907:
906:
902:
898:
894:
893:
892:
888:
884:
880:
875:
872:
871:
869:
865:
864:
863:
859:
855:
851:
850:
849:
848:
844:
840:
839:185.5.164.214
832:
828:
824:
820:
817:
812:
809:
806:
805:
802:
799:
785:
781:
777:
773:
769:
768:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
750:
749:
745:
741:
737:
732:
727:
726:WP:INHERITORG
723:
722:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
698:
693:
690:
687:
684:
683:
681:
680:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
658:
657:
653:
649:
645:
644:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
626:
625:
624:
620:
616:
608:
606:
590:
586:
580:
577:
576:
573:
556:
552:
548:
547:
542:
539:
535:
534:
530:
524:
521:
518:
514:
501:
497:
491:
488:
487:
484:
467:
463:
459:
455:
454:
449:
446:
442:
441:
437:
431:
428:
425:
421:
408:
405:(assessed as
404:
403:
393:
389:
388:
384:
381:(assessed as
380:
379:
369:
365:
364:
360:
356:
350:
347:
346:
343:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
309:
304:
301:
297:
296:
292:
285:
281:
276:
273:
270:
266:
261:
257:
251:
243:
239:
234:
233:
214:
213:
208:
204:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1097:
1094:
1075:
1056:
1053:
1044:
1031:
1013:
1010:
999:
990:
934:
836:
703:
612:
604:
584:
544:
495:
451:
400:
376:
354:
306:
256:WikiProjects
202:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1078:80.43.63.48
1059:LWinterberg
883:LWinterberg
833:Derivatives
148:free images
31:not a forum
1115:Categories
868:Sneedacity
728:explains:
471:Podcasting
430:Podcasting
1015:Skencer11
708:WP:SIGNIF
330:Computing
317:computing
313:computers
275:Computing
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
973:Aingotno
960:Update:
895:Okay. -
458:podcasts
280:Software
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1091:Talking
996:hiatus.
771:either.
736:WP:CORP
587:on the
498:on the
357:on the
246:C-class
203:90 days
154:WP refs
142:scholar
969:active
704:parent
666:WP:GNG
319:, and
252:scale.
126:Google
1045:isn't
940:Ahunt
897:Ahunt
854:Ahunt
776:Ahunt
740:Ahunt
670:Ahunt
634:Ahunt
191:Index
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1103:talk
1082:talk
1072:muse
1063:talk
1019:talk
977:talk
944:talk
938:. -
935:Done
919:talk
909:The
901:talk
887:talk
858:talk
843:talk
823:talk
819:RZuo
780:talk
762:talk
744:talk
716:talk
674:talk
660:See
652:talk
638:talk
632:. -
619:talk
460:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
579:Mid
490:Top
349:Low
176:TWL
1117::
1105:)
1084:)
1065:)
1021:)
979:)
971:.
946:)
921:)
903:)
889:)
860:)
845:)
825:)
782:)
764:)
746:)
718:)
710:?
676:)
654:)
640:)
621:)
409:).
385:).
315:,
282:/
278::
201::
193:,
156:)
54:;
1101:(
1080:(
1061:(
1017:(
975:(
942:(
917:(
899:(
885:(
856:(
841:(
821:(
778:(
760:(
742:(
714:(
672:(
650:(
636:(
617:(
591:.
502:.
361:.
258::
195:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
