156:
80:
53:
364:
22:
90:
274:
needed for the article. Then, a couple of days later, I saw the little link in the reqphoto template box and thought, cool, maybe someone took a photo of the thing and licensed there photo to Flickr using a Wiki-compliant license. But I guess that's not enough. That's why I stay out of the photo/image part of
Knowledge.
273:
Well, I guess I'll never really understand the Wiki-photo policy. That's why I have generally deferred photo- and image-related article stuff to guys like you who have worked enough in the area to become facile with the rules and ins and outs. In this case, I started merely to note that a photo was
448:
This article is titled BA 2100. The first sentence starts out, "...is a conceptual design for a larger, heavier, and more capable expandable space station module, or interplanetary human transport module." There needs to be some rewording and either some redundant information from the other articles
321:
Yes, the licensing issues are very complex and, well, frustrating, even to those who have a grasp on it. Once I can deal with it, I'll simply nominate for deletion at
Commons and reupload here at en.wiki. There's no reason why it can't still be used...it simply can't be used under a free license
239:
to license it. The model, which is the focus on the image, is a copyrighted sculpture, thus the image is a derivative. U.S. law protects such things (just like you cannot take a freely-licensed photo of a modern sculpture in a museum). You may want to request deletion yourself, rather than have
188:
This article would clearly benefit from a photograph of the model built for and shown at the recent (October 2010) International
Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight (ISPCS) in New Mexico. Did anyone take a photo that they would be willing to release to Wikimedia under a commons
165:
63:
240:
someone else do it. Up to you. If a photo is to be included in the article, it will have to be used under fair-use restrictions, since it is not possible to obtain a free image at this time.
217:
template, and have loaded it into
Wikimedia. Give it a few days for someone to complete the image license review and I suspect we will have a photo that may be used on this page.
417:
371:
235:
N2e, I wanted to give you a heads up, but that image will have to be deleted off
Commons. Just because the photographer licensed it on Flickr, doesn't mean he has the
532:
527:
146:
136:
537:
487:
refers to it as
Olympus rather than BA 2100 apparently. I'd leave it alone for now until and unless more evidence of "B2100" being used comes about.
522:
112:
103:
58:
430:
155:
501:
336:
254:
33:
426:
498:
333:
251:
21:
416:
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant
406:
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
39:
392:
before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
473:
111:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
495:
330:
248:
95:
292:
211:
454:
469:
397:
79:
52:
516:
490:
410:
401:
389:
325:
300:
243:
222:
194:
287:
So like with everything else on
Knowledge, I will just relax, and let the result
450:
108:
363:
355:
File:Bigelow BA-2100 expandable space module.jpg
Nominated for speedy Deletion
85:
468:
Should this article be renamed to B2100 to match the new name for the B330?
423:
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image
288:
296:
218:
207:
I found a photo on Flickr, using the image-finding tool suggested by the
190:
484:
388:; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review
374:, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason:
376:
Knowledge files with no non-free use rationale as of 23 March 2012
507:
477:
458:
434:
342:
304:
260:
226:
198:
15:
418:
image page (File:Bigelow BA-2100 expandable space module.jpg)
154:
483:
Hmm. Is it actually being referred to as "B2100" anywhere?
409:
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
295:in the great socialsphere of Knowledge. Cheers.
372:File:Bigelow BA-2100 expandable space module.jpg
8:
47:
19:
49:
533:Space stations working group articles
7:
322:because it is a copyrighted object.
101:This article is within the scope of
528:Low-importance spaceflight articles
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
121:Knowledge:WikiProject Spaceflight
538:WikiProject Spaceflight articles
362:
166:the space stations working group
124:Template:WikiProject Spaceflight
88:
78:
51:
20:
523:Stub-Class spaceflight articles
400:then you may need to provide a
370:An image used in this article,
141:This article has been rated as
1:
343:15:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
305:13:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
261:04:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
227:01:11, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
199:20:29, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
163:This article is supported by
115:and see a list of open tasks.
459:21:52, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
554:
449:or these articles merged.
435:15:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
147:project's importance scale
162:
140:
73:
46:
508:01:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
478:15:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
104:WikiProject Spaceflight
427:CommonsNotificationBot
159:
28:This article is rated
485:Bigelow's own website
184:Article needs a photo
158:
127:spaceflight articles
390:deletion guidelines
402:fair use rationale
160:
96:Spaceflight portal
34:content assessment
505:
441:
440:
381:What should I do?
340:
293:spontaneous order
258:
181:
180:
177:
176:
173:
172:
545:
506:
493:
464:Rename to B2100?
396:If the image is
366:
359:
358:
341:
328:
259:
246:
216:
210:
129:
128:
125:
122:
119:
98:
93:
92:
91:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
553:
552:
548:
547:
546:
544:
543:
542:
513:
512:
488:
466:
446:
411:Deletion Review
357:
323:
241:
214:
208:
186:
126:
123:
120:
117:
116:
94:
89:
87:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
551:
549:
541:
540:
535:
530:
525:
515:
514:
511:
510:
465:
462:
445:
442:
439:
438:
414:
413:
407:
404:
383:
382:
367:
356:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
266:
265:
264:
263:
230:
229:
203:
185:
182:
179:
178:
175:
174:
171:
170:
161:
151:
150:
143:Low-importance
139:
133:
132:
130:
113:the discussion
100:
99:
83:
71:
70:
68:Low‑importance
64:Space stations
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
550:
539:
536:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
521:
520:
518:
509:
503:
500:
497:
492:
486:
482:
481:
480:
479:
475:
471:
463:
461:
460:
456:
452:
443:
437:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
419:
412:
408:
405:
403:
399:
395:
394:
393:
391:
387:
380:
379:
378:
377:
373:
368:
365:
361:
360:
354:
344:
338:
335:
332:
327:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
262:
256:
253:
250:
245:
238:
234:
233:
232:
231:
228:
224:
220:
213:
206:
205:
204:
201:
200:
196:
192:
183:
168:
167:
157:
153:
152:
148:
144:
138:
135:
134:
131:
114:
110:
106:
105:
97:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
467:
447:
422:
421:
415:
385:
384:
375:
369:
236:
202:
187:
164:
142:
102:
40:WikiProjects
386:Don't panic
118:Spaceflight
109:spaceflight
59:Spaceflight
517:Categories
444:Needs work
189:license?
30:Stub-class
470:Quadrplax
491:Huntster
398:non-free
326:Huntster
244:Huntster
212:reqphoto
145:on the
451:Otr500
289:emerge
36:scale.
291:as a
237:right
474:talk
455:talk
431:talk
301:talk
223:talk
195:talk
297:N2e
219:N2e
191:N2e
137:Low
519::
489:—
476:)
457:)
433:)
425:--
324:—
303:)
242:—
225:)
215:}}
209:{{
197:)
62::
504:)
502:c
499:@
496:t
494:(
472:(
453:(
429:(
339:)
337:c
334:@
331:t
329:(
299:(
257:)
255:c
252:@
249:t
247:(
221:(
193:(
169:.
149:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
