Knowledge

Talk:Borro Private Finance

Source 📝

910:. If someone says they work in retail today, it means a brick and mortar store, not an ecommerce site. It is not reasonable say BPF is a straight up "pawnbroker", because that implies a store where you bring the personal items to secure the loan. This is a new and innovative business model. It is of course understandable that people would call this an "online pawnbroker", because that describes the business in terms that people understand using common vernacular. When you say a company is a pawnbroker it has brick and mortar connotations that don't apply to BPF, such as walking into the store and seeing all the stuff people hocked that is now for sale. That aspect of pawnbroking isn't part of the BPF business. Also BPF will make loans with boats as collateral. That's why a Borro spokesperson said "We lend more than a pawnbroker". She is comparing their business to the pawnbroking industry. The problem is that with BPF, as with many new business models, the new nomenclature, doesn't take right away. In this case, BPF uses "personal asset lending", but people don't know what that means. It's appropriate to use "personal asset lender" to describe the new business model, even if BPF invented the term. They innovated in the market and named their new innovation. Eventually this may become the vernacular. At the same time, saying "online pawnbroker" makes sense to help readers understand the new business using older terminology. That's what the sources are doing. To me the right course is to use new terminology in the introductory sentence: "Borro Private Finance (previously known as Borro) is a UK-US-based personal asset lender that offers loans secured on luxury assets." The term "online pawnbroker" can be used later to describe the business in lay terms, as opposed to defining the business that way. To insist that BPF is inarguably a pawnbroker is in my view incorrect. 707:
company does, it makes loans based on taking goods as collateral. I suspect that the company does not want to use the term in its marketing because of its image but that does not change the what it does. If you have a good reason that pawnbroker is not suitable description please discuss it on the article talk page and try and get some consensus from other editors. Saying stop editing the page is not a good reason. I am not sure if you are in anyway associated with the company but if you are please also see
730:"In lending agreements, collateral is a borrower's pledge of specific property to a lender, to secure repayment of a loan. The collateral serves as a lender's protection against a borrower's default and so can be used to offset the loan if the borrower fails to pay the principal and interest satisfactorily under the terms of the lending agreement." I'd say that these two descriptions are even more pertinent than the Pawnbroker one. Thanks, looking forward to your reply. 464: 230: 282: 261: 375: 354: 201: 385: 906:
businesses want to differentiate themselves from the more traditional "old school" industry. The word "retailer" is appropriate for a brick and mortar store, and not for an online ecommerce site. When the business model of retail went online, such as with Amazon, people would say "online retailer", to convey a new business model. Then the term evolved to
929:
has said. The fact of the matter is that BPF uses an innovative business model and completely rebranded and changed the way the business operated last year. Look at the older references in the media, the company isn't called "Borro" anymore, and the business has completely changed the the way it does business. Companies are constantly innovating.
1149:
Came here in response to the RFC above but clearly cant understand what all the fluff and trivia, some of it unreferenced that is "In the Media" most has no relevance to understanding the company. Either delete or a serious cull is required but as a "drop by" user perhaps the regulars can perform the
928:
Quite frankly, I think that Coastside sums up the point I've been trying to make this whole time. While describing the company as an "online pawnbroker" may help the average person understand the company and how it operates better, saying defiantly that BPF is a pawnbroker is incorrect - as Coastside
767:
Hi Cedichee, I understand your rational and happy to have both terms linked in the opening line, but I still feel that pawnbroker is the better description. I appreciate that the company does not want to categorize itself as a pawnbroker because of the perceived negative connotations but this is not
706:
Please note that everybody is free to edit pages on Knowledge which is a key tenet of the Knowledge. Even your own explanation is exactly what a pawnbroker does. I see you keep removing the pawnbroker term from the article Borro. Having looked at the definition of Pawnbroker this is exactly what the
656:
and I have added this link a few times to this article. It is a clear from some of the references that the company does not like this term and there have been a number of attempts to remove this from the lead. It may be this is from users that have connection to the company. To make sure we keep a
1181:
I also concur, and would go as far as saying that the whole section should be deleted. Whilst I appreciate the effort it would have taken for this list to be put together, the reality is that it adds nothing of substance to the article. Any material which others deem should be preserved should be
905:
At first this debate reminded me of when ads for car dealerships started using the term "pre-owned" instead of "used". However, I think it's important to recognize that new business models and other innovations often introduce a change in nomenclature. And it's understandable that innovative
975:
is an ok term to me. At Knowledge we only follow what the sources are using, and until there is a newfangled name for this type of lending and the sources accept it, then let's just use the good 'ole term we have been using even clearly the article's subject PR department doesn't like it.
1057:
Asset-based lender - as used in this page - seems to be a branding or marketing phrase. The outline of the company's services qualifies it as pawnbroker. The term asset-based lender is also repeated in the body so once consensus is reached, they need modification for consistency.
949:
While I understand that businesses innovate and want to market their innovation with new nomenclature, it is not Knowledge's purpose to assist in promotion of its use. Instead Knowledge should reflect the terminology and language currently used in
679:
Please stop editing the page. The company does not operate like a pawn broker, it operates like a secure lender that uses collateral to determine the value of the loan. I ask you kindly to please stop editing the page and focus on another
997:
RS refers to the company as a pawnbroker, I would not use that in the lead, as the media at large in that case doesn't prefer the term. If there is just a tiny bit of support, mention it in the body of the page with context, such as
164: 768:
a criteria we need to consider. However, given we are at an impasse I think we need a third party involved to resolve this so have copied our conversation to the talk page and I will list it for comment.
726:
does. Taken from wikipedia: "Asset-based lending is any kind of lending secured by an asset. This means, if the loan is not repaid, the asset is taken." A 'Collateral Based Lender' also applies here.
482: 585: 722:
November 26, 2018: Hi Sargdub, I apologize for maybe handling this a bit inappropriately. When you say that my explanation is exactly what a pawnbroker does, I'd argue that it's exactly what an
1238: 336: 326: 1243: 1233: 158: 302: 806: 810: 55: 289: 266: 854: 521: 508: 441: 90: 1182:
integrated in the History or Services section(s): if it cannot be so integrated, then that is an indication that it is not relevant for the article.
1253: 431: 1258: 1248: 211: 96: 1003: 495: 407: 814: 515: 1210: 1080: 955: 826: 179: 146: 661:
it would be good other Knowledge editors could comment on whether this term describes this business and is fair in this context.
398: 359: 110: 41: 802: 842: 745: 708: 695: 576: 115: 31: 647:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1117:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
85: 489: 476: 241: 954:; and only adopt new terminology once it has entered general vernacular by being used by reliable sources, not before. 140: 502: 76: 858: 818: 136: 207: 850: 834: 1007: 830: 631: 229: 186: 1045: 120: 1214: 1084: 959: 548: 838: 1155: 1135: 893: 528: 247: 35: 1063: 981: 871: 733: 727: 683: 200: 930: 915: 737: 723: 687: 627: 172: 152: 66: 406:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
301:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1170: 1041: 1024: 934: 741: 691: 81: 1202: 793:- Pawnbroker is a term that describes this business and is fair in this context. We go by how 773: 666: 626:
Consensus that the RS support the term "pawnbroker" to describe the business of this company.
62: 1187: 1151: 1131: 1102: 889: 534: 390: 652:
I appears to me that the most accurate way to describe the business this company does is a
1059: 977: 862: 565: 1203:"Routine news reporting ... is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia." 911: 658: 541: 463: 1227: 1206: 1166: 1020: 1209:
covered by these media reports then they should be included in the History section.
1076: 1037: 951: 794: 769: 662: 1218: 1191: 1183: 1174: 1159: 1139: 1107: 1097: 1088: 1067: 1049: 1028: 1011: 985: 963: 938: 919: 897: 880: 798: 777: 749: 670: 635: 822: 653: 380: 298: 1205:
As such, this section should be deleted. If there are any events of enduring
846: 1002:
Otherwise, we have no place making up corporate classifications ourselves.
281: 260: 17: 293:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to 907: 403: 374: 353: 294: 711:
before making any edits. Sargdub (talk) 18:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
675:
Moved from individual talk page as more appropriate to discuss here:
993:
If a reliable source calls them a pawnbroker, so be it. If only
223: 195: 26: 483:
Knowledge:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
1000:
source A refers to the company as similar to a pawnbroker.
797:
describe this business and there are plenty of sources to
1127: 171: 402:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1075:use of term pawnbroker as it is well supported by 1019:as used by realiable sources cited by Isaidnoway. 1239:Low-importance Finance & Investment articles 44:for general discussion of the article's subject. 311:Knowledge:WikiProject Finance & Investment 1244:WikiProject Finance & Investment articles 1234:Start-Class Finance & Investment articles 314:Template:WikiProject Finance & Investment 185: 8: 522:Category:Company articles needing infoboxes 509:Category:Company articles needing attention 227: 731: 681: 471:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 449: 348: 255: 1130:; pls see edit summary for rationale. -- 350: 257: 210:on 11 April 2011 (UTC). The result of 547:Help expand stub articles located at 7: 888:as used by realiable sources above. 643:The following discussion is closed. 496:Category:Unassessed company articles 396:This article is within the scope of 290:WikiProject Finance & Investment 287:This article is within the scope of 246:It is of interest to the following 34:for discussing improvements to the 25: 317:Finance & Investment articles 1113:The discussion above is closed. 801:the description of pawnbroker - 573:Tag company talk pages with the 462: 383: 373: 352: 280: 259: 228: 199: 56:Click here to start a new topic. 1254:Low-importance company articles 436:This article has been rated as 416:Knowledge:WikiProject Companies 331:This article has been rated as 206:This article was nominated for 1259:WikiProject Companies articles 709:Knowledge:Conflict of interest 562:Tag company articles with the 419:Template:WikiProject Companies 1: 1160:11:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC) 1126:Preserving here by providing 1068:23:17, 2 September 2019 (UTC) 898:11:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC) 881:08:36, 13 December 2018 (UTC) 750:16:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC) 636:00:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC) 410:and see a list of open tasks. 305:and see a list of open tasks. 53:Put new text under old text. 1249:Start-Class company articles 1219:00:06, 11 October 2019 (UTC) 1108:20:54, 23 October 2019 (UTC) 1089:00:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC) 964:00:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC) 939:17:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC) 920:04:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC) 778:03:24, 1 December 2018 (UTC) 671:19:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC) 453:WikiProject Companies To-do: 1077:reliable, published sources 1050:07:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC) 61:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 1275: 442:project's importance scale 337:project's importance scale 1192:16:54, 18 July 2019 (UTC) 1175:17:26, 17 June 2019 (UTC) 1029:17:19, 17 June 2019 (UTC) 1012:20:26, 11 June 2019 (UTC) 448: 435: 368: 330: 275: 254: 91:Be welcoming to newcomers 1140:03:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC) 1115:Please do not modify it. 1096:That term is applicable 645:Please do not modify it. 308:Finance & Investment 267:Finance & Investment 1165:Concur, trivia at best. 986:23:44, 6 May 2019 (UTC) 549:Category:Company stubs 236:This article is rated 86:avoid personal attacks 586:requests for comments 577:WikiProject Companies 399:WikiProject Companies 111:Neutral point of view 36:Borro Private Finance 728:Taken from wikipedia 116:No original research 991:Only if used in RS. 827:Wall Street Journal 619:The term pawnbroker 724:Asset Based Lender 646: 242:content assessment 97:dispute resolution 58: 752: 736:comment added by 699: 686:comment added by 644: 613: 612: 609: 608: 605: 604: 601: 600: 597: 596: 347: 346: 343: 342: 222: 221: 194: 193: 77:Assume good faith 54: 16:(Redirected from 1266: 1105: 1100: 952:reliable sources 903:Not so simple... 878: 869: 815:Business Insider 795:reliable sources 580: 569: 535:Portal:Companies 477:Article requests 466: 459: 458: 450: 424: 423: 422:company articles 420: 417: 414: 393: 391:Companies portal 388: 387: 386: 377: 370: 369: 364: 356: 349: 319: 318: 315: 312: 309: 284: 277: 276: 271: 263: 256: 239: 233: 232: 224: 203: 196: 190: 189: 175: 106:Article policies 27: 21: 1274: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1224: 1223: 1150:surgery on it. 1147: 1124: 1119: 1118: 1103: 1098: 872: 863: 649: 640: 639: 638: 621: 593: 590: 574: 563: 421: 418: 415: 412: 411: 389: 384: 382: 362: 316: 313: 310: 307: 306: 269: 240:on Knowledge's 237: 132: 127: 126: 125: 102: 72: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1272: 1270: 1262: 1261: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1236: 1226: 1225: 1222: 1221: 1195: 1194: 1178: 1177: 1146: 1143: 1123: 1120: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1091: 1070: 1052: 1031: 1014: 1004:68.129.252.188 988: 969: 968: 967: 966: 944: 943: 942: 941: 923: 922: 900: 883: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 715: 714: 713: 712: 701: 700: 650: 641: 628:Britishfinance 625: 624: 623: 622: 620: 617: 615: 611: 610: 607: 606: 603: 602: 599: 598: 595: 594: 592: 591: 589: 588: 582: 581:project banner 571: 559: 551: 537: 524: 511: 498: 485: 470: 468: 467: 455: 454: 446: 445: 438:Low-importance 434: 428: 427: 425: 408:the discussion 395: 394: 378: 366: 365: 363:Low‑importance 357: 345: 344: 341: 340: 333:Low-importance 329: 323: 322: 320: 303:the discussion 285: 273: 272: 270:Low‑importance 264: 252: 251: 245: 234: 220: 219: 212:the discussion 204: 192: 191: 129: 128: 124: 123: 118: 113: 104: 103: 101: 100: 93: 88: 79: 73: 71: 70: 59: 50: 49: 46: 45: 39: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1271: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1240: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1231: 1229: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1197: 1196: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1144: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1121: 1116: 1109: 1106: 1101: 1095: 1092: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1071: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1042:Adoring nanny 1039: 1035: 1032: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1015: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 996: 992: 989: 987: 983: 979: 974: 971: 970: 965: 961: 957: 953: 948: 947: 946: 945: 940: 936: 932: 927: 926: 925: 924: 921: 917: 913: 909: 904: 901: 899: 895: 891: 887: 884: 882: 879: 877: 876: 870: 868: 867: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 840: 839:New York Post 836: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 789: 788: 779: 775: 771: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 729: 725: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 710: 705: 704: 703: 702: 697: 693: 689: 685: 678: 677: 676: 673: 672: 668: 664: 660: 655: 648: 637: 633: 629: 618: 616: 587: 583: 578: 572: 567: 561: 560: 558: 556: 552: 550: 546: 544: 543: 538: 536: 533: 531: 530: 525: 523: 520: 518: 517: 512: 510: 507: 505: 504: 499: 497: 494: 492: 491: 486: 484: 481: 479: 478: 473: 472: 469: 465: 461: 460: 457: 456: 452: 451: 447: 443: 439: 433: 430: 429: 426: 409: 405: 401: 400: 392: 381: 379: 376: 372: 371: 367: 361: 358: 355: 351: 338: 334: 328: 325: 324: 321: 304: 300: 296: 292: 291: 286: 283: 279: 278: 274: 268: 265: 262: 258: 253: 249: 243: 235: 231: 226: 225: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 198: 197: 188: 184: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 138: 135: 134:Find sources: 131: 130: 122: 121:Verifiability 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 108: 107: 98: 94: 92: 89: 87: 83: 80: 78: 75: 74: 68: 64: 63:Learn to edit 60: 57: 52: 51: 48: 47: 43: 37: 33: 29: 28: 19: 1211:203.10.55.11 1198: 1148: 1145:In the Media 1125: 1114: 1093: 1081:203.10.55.11 1072: 1054: 1033: 1016: 999: 994: 990: 972: 956:203.10.55.11 902: 885: 874: 873: 865: 864: 851:Fox Business 835:The Guardian 823:Entrepreneur 790: 732:— Preceding 682:— Preceding 674: 651: 642: 614: 568:|Companies}} 554: 553: 540: 539: 527: 526: 514: 513: 501: 500: 488: 487: 475: 474: 437: 397: 332: 288: 248:WikiProjects 216:no consensus 215: 182: 176: 168: 161: 155: 149: 143: 133: 105: 30:This is the 1152:MilborneOne 1132:K.e.coffman 1122:Recent edit 890:MilborneOne 855:Independent 238:Start-class 159:free images 42:not a forum 1228:Categories 1207:notability 1060:Darwin Naz 978:Jtbobwaysf 973:Pawnbroker 866:Isaidnoway 654:pawnbroker 299:Investment 18:Talk:Borro 1128:this link 912:Coastside 819:Bloomberg 413:Companies 404:companies 360:Companies 99:if needed 82:Be polite 32:talk page 1167:Pincrete 1036:per the 1021:Pincrete 931:Cedichee 831:CBS News 746:contribs 738:Cedichee 734:unsigned 696:contribs 688:Cedichee 684:unsigned 570:template 529:Maintain 503:Copyedit 208:deletion 67:get help 40:This is 38:article. 1073:Support 1040:cited. 908:etailer 807:Reuters 770:Sargdub 663:Sargdub 659:WP:NPOV 584:Answer 516:Infobox 440:on the 335:on the 295:Finance 165:WP refs 153:scholar 1184:DMew92 875:(talk) 859:HuffPo 843:Crains 811:Forbes 799:verify 680:topic. 566:portal 490:Assess 244:scale. 137:Google 1199:Agree 1038:WP:RS 555:Other 542:Stubs 180:JSTOR 141:books 95:Seek 1215:talk 1188:talk 1171:talk 1156:talk 1136:talk 1085:talk 1064:talk 1046:talk 1025:talk 1008:talk 982:talk 960:talk 935:talk 916:talk 894:talk 803:CNBC 774:talk 742:talk 692:talk 667:talk 632:talk 297:and 214:was 173:FENS 147:news 84:and 1104:333 1099:HAL 1094:Yes 1055:Yes 1034:Yes 1017:Yes 995:one 886:Yes 847:BBC 791:Yes 432:Low 327:Low 187:TWL 1230:: 1217:) 1201:. 1190:) 1173:) 1158:) 1138:) 1087:) 1079:. 1066:) 1048:) 1027:) 1010:) 984:) 962:) 937:) 918:) 896:) 857:, 853:, 849:, 845:, 841:, 837:, 833:, 829:, 825:, 821:, 817:, 813:, 809:, 805:, 776:) 748:) 744:• 694:• 669:) 634:) 579:}} 575:{{ 564:{{ 167:) 65:; 1213:( 1186:( 1169:( 1154:( 1134:( 1083:( 1062:( 1044:( 1023:( 1006:( 980:( 958:( 933:( 914:( 892:( 861:. 772:( 740:( 698:) 690:( 665:( 630:( 557:: 545:: 532:: 519:: 506:: 493:: 480:: 444:. 339:. 250:: 218:. 183:· 177:· 169:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 139:( 69:. 20:)

Index

Talk:Borro
talk page
Borro Private Finance
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Articles for deletion
deletion
the discussion

content assessment
WikiProjects

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.