Talk:Battle of Badon - Knowledge (XXG)

2559:

Romanized and borrowed many Latin words, but still maintained their native language and many native traditions, though by the 4th century AD, they abandoned their native religion for Christianity along with the rest of the Roman empire. Although the Roman governors, military officers, and civilians doing official business with the army in Britain came from all over the empire, many of the lower ranking Roman soldiers stationed in Britain during the empire were ethnic Gauls and Germans - there were even some Sarmatians introduced in the 2nd century AD. Some of these soldiers remained in Britain and intermarried with the locals. Others went home when their service ended, or they were transferred to other regions. Towards the end of Roman rule, most soldiers serving in Britain were local men and could be either purely British, or the descendants of foreign soldiers and local women. Still, this foreign element made up only a tiny percentage of the over all population in Britain; the vast majority remained ethnic Britons (with influxes of Irish in western and northern Britain, and Germanic Angles, Saxons and Jutes during the post-Roman period in the early 5th century).

1319:

claims, and he names no leader for that battle, as neither did Gildas. Bede was copying, almost word for word, Gildas's sixth century text; The Destruction and Conquest of Britain. If the Venerable Bede HAD made such a claim that Ambrosius had won Badon Hill, then there would be no great discussion as to who had won that battle today. The article writer has got their facts wrong on this account and it needs to be removed in order for it to be historically correct. The Venerable Bede did NOT claim this battle for Ambrosius Aurelianus. Knowledge (XXG) articles must be objective, with content based on evidence and fact if they are to have any value to researchers; or if Knowledge (XXG) itself is to have any value. The 'fact' of Ambrosius in this article is wrong.

1342:

Ecclesiastical History, ch. 64: 'Their leader at this time was Ambrosius Aurelianus... Under his leadership the British took up arms, challenged their conquerors to battle, and with God's help inflicted a defeat on them. Thenceforward victory swung first to one side and then the other, until the battle of Badon Hill, when the Britons made a considerable slaughter of their invaders.' Therefore it seems a reasonable assumption that Bede and Gildas meant to imply that he was there. At the moment, all the article says is 'More recently, scholars guessed that the Romano-British leader could have been Ambrosius Aurelianus'; it's hardly a recent assumption. I think Ambrosius needs to move up the page!

2565:

Britons and Germanics during this time period and the over all trend was for the British to lose their hold over much of the territory that was to become England. Those Britons who didn't die in battle either fled to western Britain (where they blended with the locals to became the Welsh, Cornish and Cumbric peoples), or to Armorica in Gaul (where they blended with the locals, but maintained their British language and culture, thus becoming the Bretons), or they surrendered themselves to living under Germanic rule, their descendants gradually becoming Germanicized and intermarrying with their new overlords, producing the English people.

793: 772: 987: 966: 2102:"Romano-Briton" is cultural, rather than taxonomical. It simply means a "Romanized Briton". Considering that Badon most likely occurred decades after any real Roman governance had ended in Britian, it's arguable that its victors should be referred to as "Romano-Britons". But they were certainly "Britons". That is the universally accepted term for the Celtic-speaking natives of Britain in this period. I'll clean up the article a little and see if it helps; it will need much more than I'm able to do today, but that's another matter.-- 243: 222: 2637:

countryside, but there were no more pagan priests (The Romans had already outlawed and destroyed the Druid class centuries earlier), the temples were left to rot (as vividly described by Gildas), and public pagan ceremonies that couldn't be Christianized were abolished. As far as my "blending in with the locals" line, there's really no other way to put it; Southwestern Britons who left Britain for Armorica did just that (as the archaeological and historical record affirms).

898: 253: 877: 599: 578: 533: 803: 688: 667: 549: 418: 2415:. There is an obvious reason that most of the world regards those two words as virtually synonymous, whether or not it's a reason you care for -- and even if, for some obscure reason, you regard people who are not well informed about this ancient period as dunces. Perhaps because you do not have any scholarly topics in which you are poorly informed, and wish to learn more, as our reader do? 1107: 1086: 698: 2622:

Britons were neither killed in battle nor fled for the hills, and the "blending with the locals" is a bit of a scream. After all, it was your Britons not killed in battle who had to find locals to blend with. The Britons who "surrendered themselves" to living under Germanic rule had to blend with themselves and with the Germanics. Never mind, this is not a serious dispute.

191: 2536:

first the Anglo-Saxon invasion? • Did they were call Welsh, by the invaders? • Does Welsh means foreign? • Do they live in Wales actually? • Are the Roman-Britons, a mix of roman empire people and native Briton Celts? Most of Italian students and I, have no form an exact idea about this subject, because many English and Italian history teachers, don’t work properly!

490: 479: 468: 457: 2279:

majority - is still a matter of debate. St. Patrick, for instance, though he and his parents had Latin names, complained in his writings of struggling with the Latin language, so it clearly wasn't his native tongue. The Britons who settled in Armorica spoke a dialect of Neo-Brittonic (soon to become Old Breton) - not Latin - as their first language.

358: 327: 446: 1297:

I've corrected the 'quotation' from Annales Cambriae. It has 'Bellum Badonis' for both battles, not Mount/mons or badonicus. The 'date' it gives has quite a wide range for an AD equivalent. I think the second battle of Badon is Bedanheafod of the ASC, which Plummer thought was a Great Bedwyn (covered

3259:

states against "result" that "this parameter may use one of two standard terms: "X victory" or "Inconclusive"." The infobox has been amended to reflect this. Please read the template "result" guidance in full before amending or reverting. It would probably be best to discuss any proposed change here

2535:

To discuss this subject more define and precisely: • Are the “British’ ”, the actual people who lives in the south of Great Britain Island? • Does it consist of German-Anglo-Saxon, Frisian and Jute people, mixed with Native and Roman-Britons? • Are the Native Britons, the ancient Celts in Britain,

2449:

I stand by "correct". There must be hundreds of thousands of scholarly topics on which every one of us is poorly informed, but it would be a bad idea to ask anyone writing about them to reinvent the names of things, supposedly for the benefit of 'beginners' in the topics. Beginners need to learn and

1914:

Sorry, but I find it very odd to suggest that we should change the terminology because the "average reader" might get confused! Knowledge (XXG) is already dumbed down enough, let's not make it any worse. Britons or British are the universally accepted English terms for the native, pre-English people

3114:

The early sources' account that the Saxons were thrown back around this time seems to be borne out by archaeological evidence. Studies of cemeteries (at this point, the Anglo-Saxons remained pagan while the Britons were Christianized) suggest the border shifted some time around 500. Afterwards, the

2585:

I'm not sure about "abandoned their native religion for Christianity along with the rest of the Roman empire", which suggests that Christianity became the only religion of Britain and the Empire! When it comes to "fled to western Britain (where they blended with the locals...)", that has a definite

2313:

Yes, again, "Romano-Briton" is a cultural label, not an ethonym. It simply means a Briton who is culturally Romanized. As it's unclear how "Romanized" the Britons were by 500 AD, the label is problematic. On the other hand, "Briton" is 100% accurate. We shouldn't be including potentially misleading

2230:

article itself says, " scholars ... believe that ... approximately from 410 AD when Roman legions withdrew, to 597 AD ... southern Britain preserved a sub-Roman society that was able to survive the attacks from the Anglo-Saxons and even use a vernacular Latin for an active culture." This completely

1481:

I would agree with GTN if I were sure "Badon Hill" was in fact the common name. But "Mount Badon" is common as well (perhaps even more so), and so is just Badon, and it is not as if Mons Badonicus is uncommon. I'm almost inclined to suggest we go with Battle of Mount Badon. We should also note that

1318:

Only one comment that needs serious consideration: this article has a blatant error in the beginning, where the writer states that the Venerable Bede claimed in his Ecclesiastical History of the English People that Ambrosius Aurelianus as the victor at Badon Hill. This is not so. Bede makes no such

2606:

Whether you are sure about it, or not, is immaterial; this is a matter of historical record - the Britons south of the Wall were thoroughly Christianized under Roman rule (of course, like everywhere else, traces of the old religion were absorbed into their version of Christianity). I have no idea

2564:

During the mid-5th century and continuing through much of the 6th century, there was a greater influx of Germanic peoples - how many people came over is still a subject of debate, but there were certainly enough to cause a great cultural disruption in Britain. Many wars were fought between native

2675:

However, it is true that the real established power was Christianity after that point, and I think the summary of what happened in the Anglo-Saxon settlement is pretty accurate. He's clearly talking about those Britons in the territories conquered by the Saxons being pushed west (to "blend" with

2666:

I believe Cagwinn was just attempting a simple narrative to answer the anon's questions generally. But yes, there could be more nuance. For starters, following the Roman takeover there was substantial syncretism between British and Roman (and other Continental) religious practice. Britain's most

2636:

You really need to brush up on your history - you seem to have some very warped ideas about Britain in late antiquity and the post-Roman period. For all intents and purposes, paganism was wiped out in Britain; sure, some much debased form of it was being kept alive among the peasant class in the

2621:

Then we agree that the pagan religions were not quite abandoned. I'm sorry, Cagwinn, it was just your image of those disappearing Britons (the ones who hadn't been killed in battle, that is) fleeing for the west or over the sea and then "blending with the locals". We now believe that most of the

2558:

Here is a very simple summary. Historically speaking, the British (Brittones in Latin) were the native population of Britain; by the first millennium BC (if not earlier) they spoke a Celtic language closely related to Gaulish. During the period of Roman rule, the southern British became heavily

2499:

Sorry to weigh back in on this after so long, but I still don't see what is wrong with Brython. It as correct a term as any, distinguishes from the modern usage of Briton and avoids the argument about precisely what portion of the population spoke Latin or how many had ever been to a caldarium.

2651:

I see, so a much debased form of paganism was being kept alive among the peasant class in the countryside, but that doesn't count, being much debased, and bearing in mind that the townspeople were so much more significant than the peasants, even if there were not very many of them. I think the

2278:

Yes, it's true that the Sub-Roman label is often applied by scholars to this period and people born in the early 5th century surely continued to identify themselves as Roman after the withdrawal, but I believe the extent of Romanization - especially among the general population, who were the

1658:

Celtic is a broad general term whose basic meaning is widely understood, so its use is somewhat convenient. "Brythonic" would be understood by fewer people, while "British" would be misunderstood by many. Anyway, the Byzantines didn't call themselves "Byzantine" etc., but such terminological

1341:

This is a bit odd. I'd hardly say such a claim would constitute a 'serious error'. Neither Bede nor Gildas say that Ambrosius Aurelianus led the British at Badon Hill, but they both name him as being the leader of the British resistance, a resistance that culminated in the victory at Badon.

2570:

The word "Welsh" did indeed mean "foreigner" or "slave" in English - but more specifically, it meant any "Romanized person"; it is an old Germanic word and originally was borrowed from the Gaulish ethnic name Uolcae, whom Germanic people on the Continent came into contact with in ancient

2652:

funniest thing about the blending was that it was the Britons not killed in battle (the actual chaps, you see, rather than the Britons collectively) who went off and found some locals to blend with. But no matter, Cagwinn, if you can't see the funny side of it, it's no big deal.

2176:

I really don't understand why you are so adamant about forcing anachronistic terminology into the article. The Britons of c. 500 AD, were no longer Romans (and hadn't been so for several generations), therefore, they can not be properly styled Romano-British. By your logic, my

2380:

Anyone who regards 'Anglo-Saxon' as virtually a synonym for 'British' would benefit from learning the difference between the two, but no one will learn such differences from Knowledge (XXG) if we change the correct names of things in the hope of suiting the world's dunces.

2667:

famous temple, at Bath, is essentially a Roman edifice dedicated to a heavily Romanized deity. And "paganism" was certainly not wiped out by 300 AD in either Britain or the Empire generally. In Britain alone temples continued to be used (on a much reduced scale) into the

2347:

Obviously the term "Briton" is ambiguous, but there's no alternative in wide use. We've pointed out that "Romano-Briton" is problematic at best and inaccurate at worst. So long as we're consistent and explain who we're talking about up front, the risk of confusion

2034:, who in my view speaks for the consensus here. I should just like to add that one of the beauties of Knowledge (XXG) is that by blue-linking a word to a suitable article we can overcome the quite minor problem of ambiguity which all old names have in them – thus, 1190:

I am nominating this as an act of unabashed vanity -- & I'm amazed, not having read it for several months, that it still fairly close to what I strive for. I admit it needs some pictures. (I have the photos somewhere, & will scan them when I find them.) --

3193:

Or BArdon Mill Northumberland near Ravenglass Roman Barracks Hadrians Wall, both places are within a mile of eACH OTHER. bARDON mILL IS 16TH cENTURY BUT PERHAPS THE NAME RELATES TO SOMETHING OLDER ESPECIALLY WITH A rOMAN bARRACKS AND bATH hOUSE IN THE VICINITY?

2007:

BTW, it occurs to me that we might have boxed ourselves in. Perhaps a simple recasting of the sentence would allow us to avoid the ambiguous words altogether? (I'm not up the job at this hour. But maybe that would just slice the Gordion knot, tiny as it is?)

2807:(76). (And that's at Google Books; general use is more lopsidedly non-random-Latin-name friendly.) Incoming links break down similarly evenly: 10-12-12. That ignores links to the current name. There's more of those, but only because kind editors pipe it in. Cf. 540: 337: 1396:

I'm all for the Gaelic, except that it is not best known by that name and this is not the Gaelic wiki, its the english, this article name should be Battle of Badon Hill, which is how it is referred to in most media. Google backs up this assertion as well.

3215:

A subheading entitled "Siege of Badon" describes two sources for the battle, one from the sixth century and one from the eighth. The next subheading, called "Battle of Badon" the describes three more sources, from the ninth, tenth and twelfth centuries.

1942:

I take your point, Cagwinn. But WP has become one of the major information resources in the world, and that mostly means "average readers". Let's not lower the overall level of understanding in the world by needlessly confusing people. The keyword is

2177:

great-great-grandfather, who was born in NYC in 1848, should be called a British-American, even though he was born 65 years after our revolution ended and (according to family tradition) was very proud to be an American (of the non-hyphenated variety).

2852: 1751:

It appears that "Romano-British" is not only the most accurate but also the most easily understood by the average reader. "Brythonic" will have a less obvious meaning to the average reader but may be equally accurate. "British" is merely sloppy.

2859:

common). While "Battle of Badon" also returns hits for "Battle of Badon Hill", "Badon" in its own right is quite common in the literature, and additionally splits the difference between "Mount" and "Hill", the two competing translations of

2980:

by other historians. If those dates are off, it's not necessarily the Annals' fault. In fact, the B & C text annals do have entries all the way back to the birth of Christ. If you just count forward from there, Badon occurred in

2828:

As far as why use "Badon" in preference to the other two: it's shorter; includes the others; and doesn't specify a height for the place. It's also the original name of the battle (even in Latin) in surviving Welsh sources like the

1625:

The C.S. Lewis quote could be kept (it's somewhat detailed, and the Battle of Badon actually resonates with some of the themes of the book), but the others seem to be mere passing mentions, and so probably aren't as significant..

1681:

is straightforward, and so far as there ever might have been a leader called Arthur or something like it he can be identified with them and not with any wider concept of Celticism. We need to keep 'Celtic' when it's referring to

1642:

The article makes several references to "Celtic names" and Arthur as a "Celtic Leader" this is anachronistic in the extreme as the term Celt did not enter the lexicon until the 19th Century. Surely the correct term is Briton or

2464:

Jmacwiki, we've already explained why "Romano-Briton" is not adequate here. There really isn't a better term for the people discussed. Since we appropriately explain which "Britons" we're talking about, and link to the article

1988:

Well, I suggested a couple of alternatives. But if R-B is not entirely accurate, why not? I'm not being challenging, just curious: My understanding is that R-B refers precisely to these people, in this place, at this time.

1846:

As for "R-B": We already use this term in several places in this article, to refer to the time period or persons involved (e.g., "Arthur")! Badon indeed took place after the Romans had left, but we have the statement from the

1440:, not Welsh... If "Badon Hill" were a modern name of a hill which was definitely known to be the place of the battle, then the article would be renamed as you suggest, but in reality no one knows where "Badon Hill" was. 2985:, not 517. The fly in the ointment is that the texts disagree with themselves: by the time the Dionysian-era dates start, they're off by about 30 entries. Where those 30 years got lost is a matter of scholarship. The 556: 341: 1821:. More precisely, its primary meaning is different from our use here. If "Brittonic" is a better term than "Brythonic", let's use it. It is certainly less misleading than "British" here, because of the ambiguity. 1782:

When Badon took place, the British were no longer Romans, so "Romano-British" is not that accurate. "British" or "Britons" are perfectly suitable terms for these people, "Brittonic" for their language and culture.

1268:

Not sure why "Events in the Anglo-Saxon invasion of Britain" is in this article. Theoretically that section could be in every article that is mentioned. Perhaps the thing to do is make a 'list of' article, call it

153: 1966:

What are the alternatives? The scholars use "Britons" and "British" to describe these people, so we follow what they use. "Romano-British" may serve to disambiguate, but to no real gain, because it's not entirely

1686:, because whether one likes it or not that is their collective name. Other than that, I don't see any problem with 'British' – like most such words it has a variety of meanings, but we have to live with them all. 1184: 2469:, which discusses them in detail, the risk of confusing readers is minimized. Some readers may get confused regardless, but lacking a better term, there's nothing else we as Knowledge (XXG) editors can do.-- 1458:

I apologize, I was confused. I thought the reference to the english and welsh versions of the name. I wasn't paying very good attention. Yeah, the actuall title should be changed, as most people don't speak

3343: 1419:

It's also given the English name, and that is used as the most common one. The Welsh is simply given as another name for it, as has been done on many other pages. There's no reason it should be removed.

1700:

Spot on. The forms "Briton"/"Brythonic"/"British" are preferable in most cases here; "Celtic" is absolutely fine in relation to the language group, but we should not be referring to Arthur as a "Celtic

1264:

I think the article has taken on the appearance of an outline with too many sections. Sections should try to be lengthy narratives, not one sentence long. Section headers should not be replacements for

1734:

when WP uses it in a secondary sense (indeed, tertiary, according to my dictionary!), we have an obligation to avoid it if we can: Just as "Celtic" is too broad to be appropriate here, so it "British".

3338: 1157: 2145:

OK. But if anyone seriously believes that only 7-year-old, non-native speakers of English would be confused, s/he should get out of the office more often. Try talking to people who work almost

3438: 1147: 3443: 1509:

I just wanted to add that the search for the location of Badon Hill was one of the plots in Anthony Price's ingenious espionage novel "Our Man in Camelot". ISBN and other details here:

309: 2607:

what you are trying to say with your second point it is established fact that some Britons were pushed into western Britain and Brittany due to the encroachments of the Anglo-Saxons.

1851:

page that R-B culture "survived the 5th century Roman departure from Britain." It appears to be not only the most precise term we have, but one we already use freely in the article.

1310:

in the section for popular media links. Since this is a combat recreation event named after the battle, I think it would fit in just as well as video games using the battle in them.

1123: 1298:

more in my 'The Reign of Arthur', Sutton 2004, between Wulfhere of Mercia and the West Saxons. Geoffrey of Monmouth does not specify Little Solsbury Hill, just Bath. Chris Gidlow

3323: 299: 2855:

for books published since 1960 shows "Battle of Badon" as easily the most common name over "Battle of Mount Badon", "Battle of Badon Hill", and "Battle of Mons Badonicus" (the

2058:... in this case, the context more or less does the trick, but if we are worried that a seven-year old who speaks English as a third language might be misled, then by linking " 431: 408: 370: 3433: 3328: 3222:

I think it would make more sense to merge these two sections under the heading "Historical Accounts" or "Mediaeval Sources" and then have five subheadings, one per source. --

2515:

Brython(ic) is dated and (being derived from the Welsh) a bit Cambo-centric - it is not often used by modern Celticists (for whom Briton/Brittonic is the preferred term).

1119: 1114: 1091: 275: 147: 2746: 1585:

is at least 100 years later than the battle of Badon and was made in Scandinavia. It is not a relevant illustration for this article. I suggest we remove it. Comments?

1032: 1026: 3378: 744: 417: 1118:, a group of contributors interested in Knowledge (XXG)'s articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our 1510: 859: 649: 3318: 1998:

As I say, if R-B isn't appropriate in this sentence, then we may need to clean up the article more generally, because "R-B" is used in several other places in it.

2768:; further, arguments for current non-english, non-commonname unconvincing. Badon, Badon Hill, & Mount Badon are roughly equally common: Badon's shortest. — 3363: 3353: 639: 948: 266: 227: 79: 3393: 849: 2158:

And after you've done that, think about the fact that the 2nd group is far more representative of WP readers than the academics of those 2 departments are!

3413: 938: 1020: 754: 3403: 3348: 3333: 398: 2789: 1322: 3373: 3368: 2205:

inappropriate, I'm glad to see that, for consistency, Cuchullain has removed all the other R-B references that were sprinkled throughout the article.

2149:

outside English or History departments of higher education, for a change. Try it on a carpenter, or a software engineer, or even a PhD biochemist.

1068: 825: 615: 365: 332: 1180: 85: 1287:

The translations from the ASC have become irrelevant to the point of distracting. I've chopped all of this section out, per my comments above. --

44: 3294:

All indications are that the Saxons were repulsed, but at a high cost, and it doesn't seem to have made much difference over the very long term.

914: 3423: 1659:

discrepancies don't usually bother historians on grounds of being anachronistic (as opposed to interfering with accuracy of understanding). --

1058: 614:, the Arthurian era and related topics on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 3388: 3358: 2973:

The A text has none whatsoever (nil, nada, zippo); the B and C texts don't start dating their entries until well after the first millennium.

374: 720: 1404: 1270: 30: 816: 777: 606: 583: 3428: 3408: 3280: 3201: 2543: 1527: 1343: 1016: 3383: 3256: 905: 882: 99: 3398: 3136: 104: 20: 3051:

I'm loathe to keep the old "date" and "location" sections that just repeat text, but if anyone were interested enough to build a

3034: 2867: 2683: 2476: 2355: 2321: 2109: 1974: 1708: 1489: 1233: 1511:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Our-Man-Camelot-Anthony-Price/dp/0708821898/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1217911949&sr=8-1

711: 672: 74: 3418: 1334: 2377:

And most names which have been around for a few thousand years are just as ambiguous, but that does not force them out of use.

202: 168: 2812: 1464: 1425: 1012: 999: 971: 135: 65: 2801: 792: 771: 3219:

The distinction between the sections is not really the nature of warfare (siege vs battle) but simply one of chronology.

2989:

Badon date being off by 30 years isn't a point against the text – it's a sign the currently-accepted dating's lousy. —

2793: 2047: 1677:

One wouldn't necessarily wish to expunge all references to the Celts before the 19th century, but to me the name of the

3055:

for the dates and locations in the different sources, it'd be nice. They could just sit in the scholarship section. —

2941:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

2797: 2723:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

2671:

century, and less formal practices can be assumed to have continued well after the point there is evidence for them.

258: 2958:... preserve an entry for AD 665" and "The later Annales Cambriae offers the date 516" mean it's worth mentioning: 109: 2923: 1460: 1421: 129: 1212:

This occupies a chunk of space in this article, but this passage already appears in an annotated translation at

3160: 2753: 2067: 1408: 1381: 1366: 208: 3284: 3205: 2547: 2505: 1648: 1531: 1347: 986: 965: 369:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 125: 3197: 3075:

According to the Oxford Dictionary, the right pronunciation for Badon (Battle of Mount Badon) is /ˈbeɪdən/

2898: 2765: 2761: 2539: 1523: 1400: 3265: 1250: 2248:

And it makes me wonder why your flat assertion of inappropriateness does not carry any scholarly hedges.

1330: 55: 3241: 3227: 3152: 2501: 1644: 1610: 913:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

824:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

719:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

274:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

175: 70: 1199:

Oppose, for now. The content seems good, but the article needs to be broken up into 3 or 4 sections.

3148: 3076: 3056: 3031: 3027:

That may be worth adding if you have a source for it. In general this article could use a makeover.--

3012: 2990: 2919: 2906: 2864: 2834: 2769: 2680: 2473: 2466: 2455: 2386: 2352: 2318: 2106: 2079: 2063: 2059: 1971: 1705: 1691: 1678: 1486: 1230: 271: 1326: 190: 3083: 2885: 2657: 2627: 2597: 1377: 1362: 242: 221: 161: 3299: 2420: 2253: 2163: 2013: 1956: 1881: 1757: 1664: 1631: 1445: 808: 3052: 3261: 3098: 2815:: "King Arthur 2004 early 5th century the Roman withdrawal from Britain and the ] Or 2642: 2612: 2588: 2576: 2520: 2284: 2182: 2124: 2043: 1920: 1788: 1579: 1482:

Gildas actually uses the Latin phrase "obsessio Badonici montis", or "seige of Mount Badon".--

1213: 51: 1605:

Fair point that it shouldn't be included here. But it was made in England, not Scandinavia.

141: 3237: 3223: 2954: 2817: 2055: 1683: 1606: 1562: 897: 876: 3028: 2902: 2861: 2757: 2708: 2677: 2470: 2451: 2382: 2349: 2315: 2103: 2093: 2075: 2051: 2031: 1968: 1702: 1687: 1590: 1557:

of a martyrdom or other event was commemorated annually and less likely to be shiftable.--

1483: 1227: 993: 821: 802: 598: 577: 24: 3168: 3079: 2881: 2811:: "Their advance was contained for some decades after the Britons' victory at the ] Or 2780:

Coming back to the discussion above about this page being at the wrong name, this page

2653: 2623: 2593: 2227: 2071: 1848: 1278: 1008: 703: 532: 3312: 3295: 2800:(130) are equally much more common is not an argument for having it at a third, much 2737: 2416: 2249: 2159: 2009: 1952: 1877: 1753: 1660: 1627: 1441: 1200: 1361:

Is this the "Battle of Badon Hill" at which Brave Sir Robin personally wet himself?

1011:. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the 3094: 2638: 2608: 2572: 2516: 2280: 2178: 2120: 2039: 2035: 1916: 1876:

However, if you feel we are misusing R-B in the article, then we should fix that.

1784: 1288: 1217: 1192: 687: 666: 1216:. Should this be snipped out with a note to the user to refer to that article? -- 1015:, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the 2222:

Your unconditional assertion that "R-B" is not an appropriate label, however, is

3156: 1558: 1519: 1376:

Never mind. I guess it helps to read the article before I ask stupid questions.

611: 548: 1183:(Revision as of 17:47, 8 Apr 2004) -- somehow my nomination was never added to 3144: 2119:

Cuchullain has it right - can folks please stop trying to reinvent the wheel?

2089: 1586: 1003:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of the ancient 798: 693: 248: 3164: 910: 2821:: "Year 72 (c. AD 516) The ]..." No one, anywhere on this talk page, uses 1106: 1085: 3176: 2733: 3303: 3288: 3269: 3245: 3231: 3209: 3102: 3087: 3064: 3039: 3020: 2998: 2927: 2910: 2889: 2872: 2842: 2777: 2741: 2688: 2661: 2646: 2631: 2616: 2601: 2580: 2551: 2524: 2509: 2481: 2459: 2424: 2390: 2360: 2326: 2288: 2257: 2186: 2167: 2128: 2114: 2097: 2083: 2017: 1979: 1960: 1947:: We have alternatives that are both correct (as yours are, to be sure) 1924: 1885: 1792: 1761: 1713: 1695: 1668: 1652: 1614: 1594: 1566: 1535: 1494: 1468: 1449: 1429: 1412: 1385: 1370: 1351: 1291: 1281: 1253: 1238: 1220: 3128: 3124: 2808: 716: 3004:

Neither here nor there but, since English isn't Latin, it's properly "

1185:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/Index

3140: 3132: 3120: 2717:

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal.

2231:

covers the epoch of this article, with several decades in addition.

1915:

of Britain, and this is what we should continue to call them here.

357: 326: 3172: 3077:

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/badon_hill,_battle_of

2935:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.

1437: 1004: 1307: 3116: 3236:

No-one objected, so I have now made the suggested amendment. --

2880:: A well argued case, and the evidence is pretty convincing. 1273:

then link to it from all the other articles as a central place.

2314:

terminology when we have and accepted alternative available.--

2153:

all regard "Anglo-Saxon" as virtually a synonym for "British".

184: 15: 1187:(possibly because it gathered little interest at the time): 547: 531: 416: 3159:, then along the Trent to the Humber, then north along the 1122:. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our 1249:

Please state which bits of information needs references.

3344:

Roman and Byzantine military history task force articles

2450:

understand the use of language, not to have it changed.

1226:

Sounds fine to me, it seems to be more relavant there.--

3147:

in addition to everything west of a line running from

160: 3339:

C-Class Roman and Byzantine military history articles

2676:

other Britons there) or else becoming Germanicized.--

1553:. The year is often flexible or forgettable, but the 1271:

List of events in the Anglo-Saxon invasion of Britain

1132:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome

909:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 820:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 715:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 610:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 429:

This article has been checked against the following

270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 514: 428: 174: 3171:, dividing the invaders into pockets south of the 3439:Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles 2918:since we use English and common names, not Latin. 284:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 3444:All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages 541:Roman and Byzantine military history task force 1135:Template:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 3257:Template:Infobox military conflict#Parameters 8: 3324:Mid-importance Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles 3167:. The salients could then be supplied along 2976:The "dates" these sources discuss are those 383:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history 2411:Let's not get too careless with words like 1181:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates 3434:B-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles 3329:All WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms pages 3195: 2531:About the ancient ethnic groups in Britain 1080: 960: 871: 766: 661: 572: 511: 425: 321: 216: 287:Template:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms 1208:Quotation from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle 363:This article is within the scope of the 3379:Mid-importance England-related articles 3184:-- 12:34, 30 September 2018‎ SNAAAAKE!! 1082: 962: 873: 834:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Middle Ages 768: 663: 624:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject King Arthur 574: 323: 218: 188: 3135:. The Britons seem to have controlled 1306:I was thinking about adding a link to 373:. To use this banner, please see the 3319:B-Class Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles 2901:as explained by nom and Cuchullain.-- 1115:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 923:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wiltshire 386:Template:WikiProject Military history 7: 3364:High-importance King Arthur articles 3354:Medieval warfare task force articles 3275:WHAT HAPPENED IN THE BATTLE OF BADON 1621:"Portrayal in popular media" section 1112:This article is within the scope of 903:This article is within the scope of 814:This article is within the scope of 709:This article is within the scope of 604:This article is within the scope of 264:This article is within the scope of 3394:Mid-importance Middle Ages articles 3093:That is ahistorical and incorrect. 729:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject England 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 3414:High-importance Wiltshire articles 1817:As I said, "British" is ambiguous 1138:Classical Greece and Rome articles 14: 3404:All WikiProject Middle Ages pages 3349:C-Class Medieval warfare articles 3334:C-Class military history articles 3260:first to seek consensus. Thanks. 3189:Siege of Badon vs Battle of Badon 3115:pagans held the present areas of 2784:at the wrong name. The fact that 1043:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Celts 50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 3374:B-Class England-related articles 3369:WikiProject King Arthur articles 3109:Unsourced for at least 5.5 years 1730:When the term is ambiguous, and 1105: 1084: 985: 964: 896: 875: 837:Template:WikiProject Middle Ages 801: 791: 770: 696: 686: 665: 627:Template:WikiProject King Arthur 597: 576: 488: 477: 466: 455: 444: 356: 325: 267:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms 251: 241: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2728:The result of the proposal was 1152:This article has been rated as 1063:This article has been rated as 943:This article has been rated as 854:This article has been rated as 749:This article has been rated as 644:This article has been rated as 403:This article has been rated as 304:This article has been rated as 2825:to discuss the battle itself. 2813:List of historical drama films 1308:http://www.dagorhir.com/badon/ 926:Template:WikiProject Wiltshire 1: 3424:Mid-importance Celts articles 2742:19:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC) 1714:14:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC) 1696:05:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC) 1669:01:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC) 1653:22:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC) 1615:13:47, 5 September 2022 (UTC) 1436:"Mons Badonicus" is actually 917:and see a list of open tasks. 828:and see a list of open tasks. 723:and see a list of open tasks. 618:and see a list of open tasks. 290:Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles 278:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 3389:B-Class Middle Ages articles 3359:B-Class King Arthur articles 3210:23:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC) 3103:02:03, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 3088:00:52, 17 October 2017 (UTC) 3065:15:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC) 3040:14:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 3021:11:01, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 2999:11:01, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 2928:00:52, 9 February 2013 (UTC) 2911:10:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC) 2890:05:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC) 2873:14:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 2843:10:34, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 2778:10:34, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 2525:15:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC) 2510:14:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC) 732:Template:WikiProject England 366:Military history WikiProject 2963:The Annals of Cambria have 1567:18:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 557:Medieval warfare task force 3460: 3429:WikiProject Celts articles 3409:B-Class Wiltshire articles 3304:15:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC) 3289:08:38, 14 April 2024 (UTC) 3131:, and the area around the 2482:14:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 2460:12:22, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 2425:06:51, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 2327:13:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC) 2289:17:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 2258:06:51, 10 April 2011 (UTC) 2129:16:31, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 2115:13:01, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 2098:08:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 2084:07:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 2018:05:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 1980:15:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC) 1961:15:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC) 1925:23:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 1886:20:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 1793:17:43, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 1762:17:25, 12 March 2011 (UTC) 1595:12:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1572:Anachronistic Illustration 1536:04:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC) 1495:22:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC) 1413:15:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 1386:15:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 1371:15:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 1352:22:05, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 1158:project's importance scale 1069:project's importance scale 1046:Template:WikiProject Celts 949:project's importance scale 860:project's importance scale 755:project's importance scale 650:project's importance scale 449:Referencing and citation: 310:project's importance scale 259:Anglo-Saxon England portal 3384:WikiProject England pages 3270:12:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC) 3232:09:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC) 3139:to the north and west of 2391:09:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC) 2361:18:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC) 2226:universally shared. The 2187:16:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC) 2168:06:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC) 1505:Another popular reference 1469:23:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 1450:01:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 1430:17:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 1292:00:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 1282:12:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1254:06:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC) 1239:19:21, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 1221:19:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 1151: 1129:Classical Greece and Rome 1100: 1092:Classical Greece and Rome 1062: 980: 942: 891: 853: 786: 748: 681: 643: 592: 555: 539: 510: 402: 389:military history articles 351: 303: 236: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 3399:B-Class history articles 3246:11:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC) 3175:in east Kent and around 2938:Please do not modify it. 2754:Battle of Mons Badonicus 2720:Please do not modify it. 2689:14:20, 23 May 2012 (UTC) 2662:19:08, 21 May 2012 (UTC) 2647:01:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC) 2632:01:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC) 2617:20:14, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 2602:18:20, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 2581:16:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 2552:01:15, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 2068:Kingdom of Great Britain 1551:"altered years of death" 1195:23:40, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC) 735:England-related articles 2074:, we are home and dry. 1542:"altered days of death" 1203:17:47, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC) 997:is within the scope of 817:WikiProject Middle Ages 607:WikiProject King Arthur 515:Associated task forces: 460:Coverage and accuracy: 3419:B-Class Celts articles 3181: 3071:Pronunciation of Badon 1547:"altered days of death 552: 536: 493:Supporting materials: 421: 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 3112: 1819:to the average reader 1325:comment was added by 906:WikiProject Wiltshire 551: 535: 420: 338:Roman & Byzantine 201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 100:Neutral point of view 3151:at the mouth of the 2467:Britons (historical) 2064:Britons (historical) 1549:". This should read 840:Middle Ages articles 630:King Arthur articles 281:Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms 272:Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms 228:Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms 105:No original research 3046:Further Improvement 2809:England#Middle Ages 2792:(132 actual uses), 2030:I still agree with 1007:and the modern day 712:WikiProject England 482:Grammar and style: 435:for B-class status: 2201:Well, if "R-B" is 1245:"Needs references" 929:Wiltshire articles 809:Middle Ages portal 559:(c. 500 – c. 1500) 553: 537: 422: 371:list of open tasks 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 3255:Please note that 3212: 3200:comment added by 3037: 2920:John Pack Lambert 2870: 2750: 2747:non-admin closure 2686: 2589:1066 and All That 2542:comment added by 2479: 2358: 2324: 2112: 2088:Make it so :-). 1977: 1711: 1538: 1526:comment added by 1492: 1415: 1403:comment added by 1357:Python reference? 1338: 1251:Anthony Appleyard 1236: 1214:Ceawlin of Wessex 1172: 1171: 1168: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1079: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1000:WikiProject Celts 959: 958: 955: 954: 870: 869: 866: 865: 765: 764: 761: 760: 660: 659: 656: 655: 571: 570: 567: 566: 563: 562: 506: 505: 451:criterion not met 407:on the project's 375:full instructions 320: 319: 316: 315: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 3451: 3251:Infobox "Result" 3062: 3061: 3035: 3018: 3017: 3009:Annales Cambriae 2996: 2995: 2955:Annales Cambriae 2948:Annales Cambriae 2940: 2868: 2840: 2839: 2818:Annales Cambriae 2775: 2774: 2744: 2722: 2684: 2554: 2477: 2356: 2322: 2110: 1975: 1709: 1684:Celtic languages 1587:Martin Rundkvist 1521: 1490: 1398: 1320: 1302:Additional Link? 1234: 1140: 1139: 1136: 1133: 1130: 1109: 1102: 1101: 1096: 1088: 1081: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1044: 1041: 989: 982: 981: 976: 968: 961: 931: 930: 927: 924: 921: 900: 893: 892: 887: 879: 872: 842: 841: 838: 835: 832: 811: 806: 805: 795: 788: 787: 782: 774: 767: 737: 736: 733: 730: 727: 706: 701: 700: 699: 690: 683: 682: 677: 669: 662: 632: 631: 628: 625: 622: 601: 594: 593: 588: 580: 573: 522: 512: 496: 492: 491: 485: 481: 480: 474: 470: 469: 463: 459: 458: 452: 448: 447: 426: 391: 390: 387: 384: 381: 380:Military history 360: 353: 352: 347: 344: 333:Military history 329: 322: 292: 291: 288: 285: 282: 261: 256: 255: 254: 245: 238: 237: 232: 224: 217: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 3459: 3458: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3309: 3308: 3277: 3253: 3191: 3111: 3073: 3059: 3057: 3048: 3015: 3013: 2993: 2991: 2971: 2950: 2945: 2936: 2837: 2835: 2772: 2770: 2758:Battle of Badon 2718: 2712: 2709:Battle of Badon 2537: 2533: 1640: 1623: 1602: 1574: 1544: 1507: 1394: 1359: 1321:—The preceding 1316: 1304: 1261: 1247: 1210: 1177: 1137: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1127: 1094: 1048: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1038: 994:Battle of Badon 974: 945:High-importance 928: 925: 922: 919: 918: 886:High‑importance 885: 839: 836: 833: 830: 829: 822:the Middle Ages 807: 800: 780: 734: 731: 728: 725: 724: 702: 697: 695: 675: 646:High-importance 629: 626: 623: 620: 619: 587:High‑importance 586: 520: 494: 489: 483: 478: 472: 467: 461: 456: 450: 445: 388: 385: 382: 379: 378: 345: 335: 289: 286: 283: 280: 279: 257: 252: 250: 230: 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 25:Battle of Badon 12: 11: 5: 3457: 3455: 3447: 3446: 3441: 3436: 3431: 3426: 3421: 3416: 3411: 3406: 3401: 3396: 3391: 3386: 3381: 3376: 3371: 3366: 3361: 3356: 3351: 3346: 3341: 3336: 3331: 3326: 3321: 3311: 3310: 3307: 3306: 3276: 3273: 3252: 3249: 3190: 3187: 3169:Watling Street 3153:Wiltshire Avon 3110: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3072: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3047: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3024: 3023: 2960: 2949: 2946: 2944: 2943: 2931: 2930: 2913: 2892: 2875: 2823:Mons Badonicus 2726: 2725: 2713: 2711: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2673: 2672: 2568: 2566: 2562: 2560: 2532: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2378: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2228:Romano-British 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2171: 2170: 2155: 2154: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2072:United Kingdom 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1983: 1982: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1849:Romano-British 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1672: 1671: 1639: 1636: 1622: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1601: 1598: 1573: 1570: 1543: 1540: 1506: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1453: 1452: 1433: 1432: 1405:24.137.207.191 1393: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1378:Applejuicefool 1363:Applejuicefool 1358: 1355: 1315: 1312: 1303: 1300: 1295: 1294: 1275: 1274: 1266: 1260: 1257: 1246: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1154:Low-importance 1150: 1144: 1143: 1141: 1110: 1098: 1097: 1095:Low‑importance 1089: 1077: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1065:Mid-importance 1061: 1055: 1054: 1052: 1049:Celts articles 1009:Celtic nations 990: 978: 977: 975:Mid‑importance 969: 957: 956: 953: 952: 941: 935: 934: 932: 915:the discussion 901: 889: 888: 880: 868: 867: 864: 863: 856:Mid-importance 852: 846: 845: 843: 826:the discussion 813: 812: 796: 784: 783: 781:Mid‑importance 775: 763: 762: 759: 758: 751:Mid-importance 747: 741: 740: 738: 721:the discussion 708: 707: 704:England portal 691: 679: 678: 676:Mid‑importance 670: 658: 657: 654: 653: 642: 636: 635: 633: 616:the discussion 602: 590: 589: 581: 569: 568: 565: 564: 561: 560: 554: 544: 543: 538: 528: 527: 525: 523: 517: 516: 508: 507: 504: 503: 501: 499: 498: 497: 486: 475: 464: 453: 439: 438: 436: 423: 413: 412: 401: 395: 394: 392: 361: 349: 348: 330: 318: 317: 314: 313: 306:Mid-importance 302: 296: 295: 293: 276:the discussion 263: 262: 246: 234: 233: 231:Mid‑importance 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3456: 3445: 3442: 3440: 3437: 3435: 3432: 3430: 3427: 3425: 3422: 3420: 3417: 3415: 3412: 3410: 3407: 3405: 3402: 3400: 3397: 3395: 3392: 3390: 3387: 3385: 3382: 3380: 3377: 3375: 3372: 3370: 3367: 3365: 3362: 3360: 3357: 3355: 3352: 3350: 3347: 3345: 3342: 3340: 3337: 3335: 3332: 3330: 3327: 3325: 3322: 3320: 3317: 3316: 3314: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3281:82.36.226.173 3274: 3272: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3258: 3250: 3248: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3234: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3220: 3217: 3213: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3202:84.69.163.131 3199: 3188: 3186: 3185: 3180: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3155:north to the 3154: 3150: 3146: 3143:and south of 3142: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3085: 3081: 3078: 3070: 3066: 3063: 3054: 3050: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3038: 3032: 3030: 3026: 3025: 3022: 3019: 3010: 3007: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2997: 2988: 2987:reconstructed 2984: 2979: 2978:reconstructed 2974: 2970: 2968: 2966: 2959: 2957: 2956: 2952:Quotes like " 2947: 2942: 2939: 2933: 2932: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2914: 2912: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2899:WP:COMMONNAME 2896: 2893: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2876: 2874: 2871: 2865: 2863: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2841: 2832: 2826: 2824: 2820: 2819: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2804: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2783: 2779: 2776: 2767: 2766:WP:COMMONNAME 2763: 2762:WP:USEENGLISH 2759: 2755: 2751: 2748: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2724: 2721: 2715: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2690: 2687: 2681: 2679: 2674: 2670: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2590: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2569: 2567: 2563: 2561: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2544:91.200.129.18 2541: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2483: 2480: 2474: 2472: 2468: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2379: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2362: 2359: 2353: 2351: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2328: 2325: 2319: 2317: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2169: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2143: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2113: 2107: 2105: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1981: 1978: 1972: 1970: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1951:unambiguous. 1950: 1946: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1850: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1820: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1733: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1715: 1712: 1706: 1704: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1680: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1637: 1635: 1633: 1629: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1582: 1578: 1571: 1569: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1541: 1539: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1528:65.127.193.41 1525: 1520: 1516: 1513: 1512: 1504: 1496: 1493: 1487: 1485: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1434: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1356: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1344:131.111.195.8 1339: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1314:serious error 1313: 1311: 1309: 1301: 1299: 1293: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1280: 1272: 1267: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1256: 1255: 1252: 1244: 1240: 1237: 1231: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1219: 1215: 1207: 1202: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1194: 1188: 1186: 1182: 1174: 1159: 1155: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1111: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1099: 1093: 1090: 1087: 1083: 1070: 1066: 1060: 1057: 1056: 1053: 1036: 1035: 1030: 1029: 1024: 1023: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 1001: 996: 995: 991: 988: 984: 983: 979: 973: 970: 967: 963: 950: 946: 940: 937: 936: 933: 916: 912: 908: 907: 902: 899: 895: 894: 890: 884: 881: 878: 874: 861: 857: 851: 848: 847: 844: 827: 823: 819: 818: 810: 804: 799: 797: 794: 790: 789: 785: 779: 776: 773: 769: 756: 752: 746: 743: 742: 739: 722: 718: 714: 713: 705: 694: 692: 689: 685: 684: 680: 674: 671: 668: 664: 651: 647: 641: 638: 637: 634: 617: 613: 609: 608: 603: 600: 596: 595: 591: 585: 582: 579: 575: 558: 550: 546: 545: 542: 534: 530: 529: 526: 524: 519: 518: 513: 509: 502: 500: 495:criterion met 487: 484:criterion met 476: 473:criterion met 465: 462:criterion met 454: 443: 442: 441: 440: 437: 434: 433: 427: 424: 419: 415: 414: 410: 409:quality scale 406: 400: 397: 396: 393: 376: 372: 368: 367: 362: 359: 355: 354: 350: 343: 339: 334: 331: 328: 324: 311: 307: 301: 298: 297: 294: 277: 273: 269: 268: 260: 249: 247: 244: 240: 239: 235: 229: 226: 223: 219: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3278: 3262:Gog the Mild 3254: 3235: 3221: 3218: 3214: 3196:— Preceding 3192: 3183: 3182: 3149:Christchurch 3113: 3074: 3008: 3005: 2986: 2982: 2977: 2975: 2972: 2964: 2962: 2961: 2953: 2951: 2937: 2934: 2915: 2894: 2877: 2856: 2848: 2830: 2827: 2822: 2816: 2802: 2785: 2781: 2752: 2729: 2727: 2719: 2716: 2668: 2587: 2538:— Preceding 2534: 2498: 2412: 2348:decreases.-- 2223: 2202: 2150: 2146: 1948: 1944: 1941: 1818: 1731: 1641: 1624: 1580: 1576: 1575: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1545: 1518:Jim Wickham 1517: 1514: 1508: 1395: 1392:Article name 1360: 1340: 1317: 1305: 1296: 1276: 1248: 1211: 1189: 1178: 1153: 1120:project page 1113: 1064: 1033: 1027: 1021: 1013:project page 998: 992: 944: 904: 855: 815: 750: 710: 645: 605: 430: 404: 364: 305: 265: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2831:A. Cambriae 2805:common name 2796:(104), and 2794:Mount Badon 2066:and not to 1967:accurate.-- 1522:—Preceding 1459:Latin! :)-- 1399:—Preceding 831:Middle Ages 778:Middle Ages 621:King Arthur 612:King Arthur 584:King Arthur 471:Structure: 148:free images 31:not a forum 3313:Categories 3145:Verulamium 3029:Cúchullain 2903:Staberinde 2862:Cúchullain 2853:This ngram 2798:Badon Hill 2678:Cúchullain 2471:Cúchullain 2452:Moonraker2 2383:Moonraker2 2350:Cúchullain 2316:Cúchullain 2104:Cúchullain 2076:Moonraker2 2032:Cúchullain 1969:Cúchullain 1732:especially 1703:Cúchullain 1701:leader".-- 1688:Moonraker2 1581:Sutton Hoo 1484:Cúchullain 1228:Cúchullain 1017:discussion 3279:GVGVNH,, 3238:Bacon Man 3224:Bacon Man 3165:North Sea 3080:Hlnodovic 2882:Skinsmoke 2860:"Mons".-- 2786:all three 2654:Moonraker 2624:Moonraker 2594:Moonraker 1607:Bacon Man 1327:TwoRiders 1279:Stbalbach 1124:talk page 1019:. Please 920:Wiltshire 911:Wiltshire 883:Wiltshire 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3296:AnonMoos 3198:unsigned 3177:the Wash 3137:salients 3058:Llywelyn 3053:wp:table 3014:Llywelyn 2992:Llywelyn 2836:Llywelyn 2771:Llywelyn 2707:Move to 2586:ring of 2540:unsigned 2417:Jmacwiki 2250:Jmacwiki 2160:Jmacwiki 2147:anywhere 2010:Jmacwiki 1953:Jmacwiki 1945:needless 1878:Jmacwiki 1754:Jmacwiki 1661:AnonMoos 1643:Brython. 1628:AnonMoos 1524:unsigned 1515:Regards 1442:AnonMoos 1401:unsigned 1335:contribs 1323:unsigned 1259:Comments 1201:Gentgeen 1175:old talk 432:criteria 342:Medieval 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 3163:to the 3161:Derwent 3129:Suffolk 3125:Norfolk 3095:Cagwinn 2916:Support 2895:Support 2878:Support 2849:Support 2639:Cagwinn 2609:Cagwinn 2573:Cagwinn 2517:Cagwinn 2502:Scrooge 2413:correct 2281:Cagwinn 2179:Cagwinn 2121:Cagwinn 2060:British 1917:Cagwinn 1785:Cagwinn 1679:Britons 1645:Scrooge 1638:Celtic? 1461:-G.T.N. 1422:-G.T.N. 1289:llywrch 1218:llywrch 1193:llywrch 1156:on the 1067:on the 947:on the 858:on the 753:on the 726:England 717:England 673:England 648:on the 405:C-class 346:C‑class 308:on the 199:B-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 3141:London 3133:Humber 3121:Sussex 3011:". — 2764:& 2760:– Per 2571:times. 2203:indeed 1583:helmet 1559:Wetman 1265:prose. 1034:Assess 1031:, and 1028:Create 205:scale. 126:Google 3173:Weald 3157:Trent 2967:dates 2857:least 2790:Badon 2730:moved 2669:fifth 2090:quota 2062:" to 2056:Roman 2052:Roman 2048:Roman 2044:Roman 2040:Roman 2036:Roman 1438:Latin 1179:From 1040:Celts 1005:Celts 972:Celts 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 3300:talk 3285:talk 3266:talk 3242:talk 3228:talk 3206:talk 3127:and 3117:Kent 3099:talk 3084:talk 2924:talk 2907:talk 2897:per 2886:talk 2833:. — 2803:less 2738:talk 2732:. -- 2658:talk 2643:talk 2628:talk 2613:talk 2598:talk 2577:talk 2548:talk 2521:talk 2506:talk 2456:talk 2421:talk 2387:talk 2285:talk 2254:talk 2183:talk 2164:talk 2151:They 2125:talk 2094:talk 2080:talk 2014:talk 1957:talk 1921:talk 1882:talk 1789:talk 1758:talk 1692:talk 1665:talk 1649:talk 1632:talk 1611:talk 1600:2022 1591:talk 1563:talk 1532:talk 1465:talk 1446:talk 1426:talk 1409:talk 1382:talk 1367:talk 1348:talk 1331:talk 1022:Join 939:High 640:High 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 3006:the 2983:487 2788:of 2734:BDD 2224:not 2070:or 1989:No? 1949:and 1577:The 1555:day 1148:Low 1059:Mid 850:Mid 745:Mid 300:Mid 176:TWL 3315:: 3302:) 3287:) 3268:) 3244:) 3230:) 3208:) 3123:, 3119:, 3101:) 3086:) 3060:II 3016:II 2994:II 2965:no 2926:) 2909:) 2888:) 2851:. 2838:II 2782:is 2773:II 2756:→ 2740:) 2660:) 2645:) 2630:) 2615:) 2600:) 2592:. 2579:) 2550:) 2523:) 2508:) 2458:) 2423:) 2389:) 2287:) 2256:) 2185:) 2166:) 2127:) 2096:) 2082:) 2054:, 2050:, 2046:, 2042:, 2038:, 2016:) 1959:) 1923:) 1884:) 1791:) 1760:) 1694:) 1667:) 1651:) 1634:) 1613:) 1593:) 1565:) 1534:) 1467:) 1448:) 1428:) 1420:-- 1411:) 1384:) 1369:) 1350:) 1337:). 1333:• 1277:-- 1025:, 521:/ 340:/ 336:: 156:) 54:; 3298:( 3283:( 3264:( 3240:( 3226:( 3204:( 3179:. 3097:( 3082:( 3036:c 3033:/ 2969:. 2922:( 2905:( 2884:( 2869:c 2866:/ 2749:) 2745:( 2736:( 2685:c 2682:/ 2656:( 2641:( 2626:( 2611:( 2596:( 2575:( 2546:( 2519:( 2504:( 2478:c 2475:/ 2454:( 2419:( 2385:( 2357:c 2354:/ 2323:c 2320:/ 2283:( 2252:( 2181:( 2162:( 2123:( 2111:c 2108:/ 2092:( 2078:( 2012:( 1976:c 1973:/ 1955:( 1919:( 1880:( 1787:( 1756:( 1710:c 1707:/ 1690:( 1663:( 1647:( 1630:( 1609:( 1589:( 1561:( 1530:( 1491:c 1488:/ 1463:( 1444:( 1424:( 1407:( 1380:( 1365:( 1346:( 1329:( 1235:c 1232:/ 1160:. 1126:. 1071:. 1037:. 951:. 862:. 757:. 652:. 411:. 399:C 377:. 312:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.