Knowledge

Talk:Battle of Kinghorn/GA1

Source 📝

42: 546:
one might argue that Kinghorn was the first conflict of the Second War of Scottish Independence, assuming you're a historian who recognises such an entity - most don't - but at the time it was just argy bargy among the Scottish nobility. I could possibly cherry pick sources - especially the more
355:
Not really. Just that he was an experienced old soldier who dropped dead in June. One source (just one) mentions rumours that the English poisoned him, but there were rumours of poisoning around most royal and near-royal deaths from 3,000 BC to about
550:
So that's two reasons why I duck it. I agree that it leaves a minor hole - but only because Knowledge as an encyclopedia likes to pigeon hole things in neat categories, inventing them - or at least overstressing their importance - if necessary.
431:
Because there is a modern secondary RS which gives a figure for the Scottish numbers, but none that do so for their casualties - they all repeat what the contemporary sources say, so I have used them. (The repetition in the Rss, not the
517:
I guess just one more thing, the first war of independence is mentioned in the body, but the second war of independence is only in the infobox. Is there any context that can be added to place this battle into the second war?
541:
Ah, you would ask that. The RSs don't really go for the First/Second war thing. ORing a bit, Balliol's invasion was just a dynastic squabble. England didn't get involved until the next year, when Edward invaded Scotland.
281:
If you mean why did I not refer to it as the "Treaty of Edinburgh–Northampton" it is because none of my sources do so. Sumption, Ormrod, Rogers and DeFries all call it the "Treaty of Northampton".
47: 80: 547:
popular ones - to come up with a coherent sentence or so, but the consensus of RS scholars is the ignore the whole First/Second Wars of Independence altogether.
70: 126: 218:"Victory for the Disinherited" capitalises Disinherited, but that doesn't appear to be used anywhere else. Is there a link for such a "formal" grouping? 122: 246:"in the English disaster of the Weardale campaign." in the English's disastrous Weardale campaign? "the English disaster of" reads very odd to me. 52: 424:"variously as 4,000, 10,000, 14,000 and 24,000" these alts are not given in the infobox yet the casualty alt figures are. Any reason for that? 156: 107: 467:"Scotland at Scone – the traditional place" if you made this a comma-separated clause, you'd avoid that tragic reference space en-dash clash. 99: 75: 571: 524: 486: 328: 150: 389:
Oof. There's a complex question. Added "or regent" and linked it, which is about the closest short equivalent.
503:, many thanks for picking this up and for your usual high-quality review. Your comments all addressed above. 115: 17: 556: 508: 365: 566: 536: 519: 500: 481: 349: 323: 146: 204:
Is there a useful link for "king of Scotland" which could be deployed on its first mention in the lead?
352:, saved my work while I checked this and forgot that that would ping you. My edit clash response is: 92: 552: 504: 361: 319: 225:
Apologies. My poor proof reading. (I think. Or a "helpful" drive-by edit I missed.) Fixed.
232:"town of Berwick" for the benefit of our many non-UK readers, I would link this location. 274:"Treaty of Northampton" any reason you're not using Knowledge's common name for this? 576: 560: 529: 512: 491: 369: 333: 160: 211:
There is a list. I don't find it that useful, but I have added it.
190:"would come over to him" bit euphemistic, can you be more direct? 316:"but he died ten days before they sailed" any detail on that? 309:
They don't, they don't. Although I like that one. Changed.
382:"as the new guardian" what is "guardian" in this context? 396:"would come over to him" again, say what this really is. 302:"turned a blind eye" not sure encyclopedia's use idioms? 134: 103: 172:"A Scottish army, possibly 4,000... this sentence is 410:"by Duncan, Earl of Fife and" comma after Fife. 8: 30: 61: 33: 439:"Dunfermline, where" consider linking. 7: 176:bloated with factoids, can we split? 24: 1: 577:07:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC) 561:21:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC) 530:21:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC) 513:20:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC) 492:19:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC) 370:21:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC) 334:20:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC) 260:Suggest linking "regent" too. 161:12:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC) 453:"Rogers' estimate" Rogers's. 601: 322:anything on this point? 572:Keep wearing the mask... 565:Understood, no problem. 525:Keep wearing the mask... 487:Keep wearing the mask... 329:Keep wearing the mask... 18:Talk:Battle of Kinghorn 288:"was 5-year" five-year 575: 528: 490: 332: 253:Reworded. Better? 89: 88: 592: 569: 567:The Rambling Man 540: 537:The Rambling Man 522: 520:The Rambling Man 484: 482:The Rambling Man 326: 324:The Rambling Man 147:The Rambling Man 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 600: 599: 595: 594: 593: 591: 590: 589: 544:Retrospectively 534: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 598: 596: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 548: 480:Nice article. 478: 477: 476: 475: 469: 468: 464: 463: 462: 461: 455: 454: 450: 449: 448: 447: 441: 440: 436: 435: 434: 433: 426: 425: 421: 420: 419: 418: 412: 411: 407: 406: 405: 404: 398: 397: 393: 392: 391: 390: 384: 383: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 359: 358: 357: 339: 338: 337: 336: 313: 312: 311: 310: 304: 303: 299: 298: 297: 296: 290: 289: 285: 284: 283: 282: 276: 275: 271: 270: 269: 268: 262: 261: 257: 256: 255: 254: 248: 247: 243: 242: 241: 240: 234: 233: 229: 228: 227: 226: 220: 219: 215: 214: 213: 212: 206: 205: 201: 200: 199: 198: 192: 191: 187: 186: 185: 184: 178: 177: 165: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 597: 578: 573: 568: 564: 563: 562: 558: 554: 549: 545: 538: 533: 532: 531: 526: 521: 516: 515: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 488: 483: 473: 472: 471: 470: 466: 465: 459: 458: 457: 456: 452: 451: 445: 444: 443: 442: 438: 437: 430: 429: 428: 427: 423: 422: 416: 415: 414: 413: 409: 408: 402: 401: 400: 399: 395: 394: 388: 387: 386: 385: 381: 380: 371: 367: 363: 360: 354: 353: 351: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 335: 330: 325: 321: 318: 317: 315: 314: 308: 307: 306: 305: 301: 300: 294: 293: 292: 291: 287: 286: 280: 279: 278: 277: 273: 272: 266: 265: 264: 263: 259: 258: 252: 251: 250: 249: 245: 244: 238: 237: 236: 235: 231: 230: 224: 223: 222: 221: 217: 216: 210: 209: 208: 207: 203: 202: 196: 195: 194: 193: 189: 188: 182: 181: 180: 179: 175: 171: 170: 169: 168: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 553:Gog the Mild 543: 505:Gog the Mild 479: 432:chronicles.) 362:Gog the Mild 320:Gog the Mild 173: 166: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 104:visual edit 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 499:Evening 460:Changed. 403:Changed. 197:Changed. 167:Comments 157:contribs 76:Criteria 127:history 108:history 94:Article 348:Sorry 474:Done. 446:Done. 417:Done. 356:1700. 295:Done. 267:Done. 239:Done. 183:Done. 136:Watch 16:< 557:talk 509:talk 366:talk 174:very 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 501:TRM 350:TRM 559:) 511:) 368:) 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 574:) 570:( 555:( 539:: 535:@ 527:) 523:( 507:( 489:) 485:( 364:( 331:) 327:( 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:Battle of Kinghorn
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
The Rambling Man
talk
contribs
12:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Gog the Mild
The Rambling Man
Keep wearing the mask...
20:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
TRM
Gog the Mild
talk
21:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
The Rambling Man
Keep wearing the mask...
19:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.