253:
243:
222:
191:
728:
Why is the Laffer Curve characterized as "purporting to show the relationship between tax cuts and government income"? The connotation is that it doesn't show that relationship. Per dictionary.com, purport means "to present, especially deliberately, the appearance of being; profess or claim, often
476:
Well, it still strikes me as an unnecessary word - there's no need to cover every possibility in a sentence lik that; we wouldn't say "nearest available piece of paper, parchment or other material capable of holding ink or other writing substance" - but I'm sure we both agree it's not worth an edit
592:
Agreed... bote-calculations mean approximations, not everything you figure out on the back of a envelope or napkin. If that was teh case i could add Steven
Weinberg figured out the beginning of his work in QFT on a napkin, and I can source that too. However, It's not a bote-calculation.
744:
There is considerable debate about the reality and accuracy of the Laffer Curve. Describing it as de facto correct would be misleading. I'll change the verb to "claim" as "purport" carries more of a negative connotation, judging from that description. -
153:
729:
falsely". It feels like editorializing. I'm not an economics expert, but the Laffer Curve was taught to me in
Macroeconomics at the University I attended (mainstream, private--not some sort of agenda driven fringe school).
703:
I can imagine topics, e.g. music theory and psychology, respectively, where these might be rational anchors, but here they simply seem to make a slightly distracting joke about how computers can waste our time.
309:
147:
44:
661:? To design something on the back of an envelope also seems like a common engineering term...and there are some nice real-world examples of designs done on table napkins. (eg
680:
That would be a separate article, if it's deserving. This BOTE is very much an engineering/science concept and term - "calculation" is the key more than the napkin. -
372:
Most paper napkins I've seen have symmetric faces. What's the back of a napkin? Perhaps whoever wrote that article was thinking of "back-of-the-envelope".
774:
577:
None of the three examples actually seem like back of the envelope calculations. A sketch of a building or tool you want to invent is not a calculation.
299:
79:
334:
It's a valid term, that's often used (at least it is where I am). You can't dispute an article because you just don't like the phrase it's describing.
521:? I've never heard it, and it's incredibly clumsy. Unless it's regularly used, it shouldn't be in the article, and especially not in the lead. -
275:
168:
769:
707:
This, of course, makes one doubt the usefulness or wit of the whole entry, whether or not the author is actually responsible for the coding.
614:
135:
85:
326:
Why would an envelope so often be at hand? Shouldn't it be called something like napkin-face? Or did this term originate in offices?
547:
410:
would be a better title (removing the hyphen between "envelope" and "calculation", and dropping the plural "s" in accordance with the
578:
393:
266:
227:
466:
I restored "available". The nearest piece of paper may not be available. It may be an important document, not to be scribbled on.--
129:
407:
373:
24:
396:
as it deals with the same subject. I favour turning this article into the redirect, as people usually use the longer phrase. --
361:
There's an article (stub) talking about back of the napkin calculations. I think these should be put into one article somehow.
99:
30:
125:
104:
20:
74:
202:
175:
714:
65:
700:
Why are "envelope" and "guess" underlined, and in fact coded, as anchors to
Knowledge entries on these notions?
618:
141:
613:
Lincoln wrote his famous speech on the back of an envelople while on a train en route to give the address. M
551:
109:
734:
582:
750:
710:
685:
636:
526:
208:
362:
252:
730:
670:
543:
493:
377:
190:
430:
I agree with the above comment regarding "s" and hyphens, but otherwise it's catch-as-catch-can. -
161:
55:
274:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
258:
70:
662:
347:
If it's really due to Enrico Fermi, then it presumably originated in a university environment.--
242:
221:
754:
738:
718:
689:
674:
640:
622:
602:
586:
555:
530:
506:
496:
481:
470:
451:
434:
421:
400:
381:
365:
351:
746:
681:
632:
522:
503:
478:
431:
335:
51:
598:
418:
540:
What does this entry have to do with the Laffer Curve and why is it referenced from here?
666:
763:
411:
343:
It's because of all the junk mail you get, you always have a useless envelope around.
327:
467:
448:
397:
348:
594:
415:
271:
248:
566:
Although interesting,I don't see how it is relevant to the article.
184:
15:
663:
http://designmuseum.org/__entry/4733?style=design_image_popup
160:
406:
I don't have a strong opinion either way, but maybe
270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
492:The reference link for Fermi Questions is 404.
174:
8:
216:
517:Does anybody really use the abbreviation
218:
188:
631:is a key part of the term, however. -
7:
392:Clearly, this should be merged with
264:This article is within the scope of
657:What about back-of-envelope/napkin
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
775:Mid-priority mathematics articles
394:Back-of-the-envelope-calculations
284:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
408:Back-of-the-envelope calculation
287:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
251:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
25:Back-of-the-envelope calculation
304:This article has been rated as
1:
719:15:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
690:15:36, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
675:14:18, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
531:19:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
477:war, so I won't re-revert. -
462:Nearest and nearest available
366:14:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
278:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
770:C-Class mathematics articles
587:04:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
382:20:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
447:I agree with Wmahan too. --
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
791:
755:14:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
739:14:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
556:11:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
482:22:15, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
471:19:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
603:23:39, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
452:19:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
435:22:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
422:19:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
401:19:19, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
352:19:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
330:17:22, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
303:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
641:15:25, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
623:13:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
507:23:00, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
497:22:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
338:22:28, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
310:project's priority scale
267:WikiProject Mathematics
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
696:Humorous HTML Anchors
647:Back-of-the-envelope
100:Neutral point of view
290:mathematics articles
105:No original research
609:Gettysburg Address
562:Delete the picture
488:Reference link 404
357:Back of the Napkin
259:Mathematics portal
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
711:David Lloyd-Jones
558:
546:comment added by
502:I removed it. -
324:
323:
320:
319:
316:
315:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
782:
541:
292:
291:
288:
285:
282:
261:
256:
255:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
790:
789:
785:
784:
783:
781:
780:
779:
760:
759:
726:
698:
655:
615:199.197.135.217
611:
575:
564:
538:
515:
490:
464:
390:
359:
289:
286:
283:
280:
279:
257:
250:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
788:
786:
778:
777:
772:
762:
761:
758:
757:
725:
722:
697:
694:
693:
692:
654:
645:
644:
643:
610:
607:
606:
605:
574:
571:
569:
563:
560:
537:
534:
514:
511:
510:
509:
489:
486:
485:
484:
463:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
440:
439:
438:
437:
425:
424:
389:
386:
385:
384:
358:
355:
345:
344:
340:
339:
322:
321:
318:
317:
314:
313:
302:
296:
295:
293:
276:the discussion
263:
262:
246:
234:
233:
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
787:
776:
773:
771:
768:
767:
765:
756:
752:
748:
743:
742:
741:
740:
736:
732:
723:
721:
720:
716:
712:
708:
705:
701:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
678:
677:
676:
672:
668:
664:
660:
652:
651:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
627:
626:
625:
624:
620:
616:
608:
604:
600:
596:
591:
590:
589:
588:
584:
580:
572:
570:
567:
561:
559:
557:
553:
549:
545:
536:Laffer Curve?
535:
533:
532:
528:
524:
520:
512:
508:
505:
501:
500:
499:
498:
495:
487:
483:
480:
475:
474:
473:
472:
469:
461:
453:
450:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
436:
433:
429:
428:
427:
426:
423:
420:
417:
413:
409:
405:
404:
403:
402:
399:
395:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
370:
369:
367:
364:
356:
354:
353:
350:
342:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
329:
311:
307:
301:
298:
297:
294:
277:
273:
269:
268:
260:
254:
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
747:DavidWBrooks
727:
709:
706:
702:
699:
682:DavidWBrooks
658:
656:
649:
648:
633:DavidWBrooks
628:
612:
576:
568:
565:
548:66.24.36.195
539:
523:DavidWBrooks
518:
516:
513:Abbreviation
504:DavidWBrooks
491:
479:DavidWBrooks
465:
432:DavidWBrooks
391:
363:74.99.19.249
360:
346:
325:
306:Mid-priority
305:
265:
231:Mid‑priority
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
731:Gvandegrift
724:Purporting?
629:Calculation
579:72.53.95.60
542:—Preceding
281:Mathematics
272:mathematics
228:Mathematics
148:free images
31:not a forum
764:Categories
667:SteveBaker
494:PseudoEdit
374:135.11.3.4
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
573:Examples
544:unsigned
328:lysdexia
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
659:designs
468:Runcorn
449:Runcorn
398:Runcorn
349:Runcorn
308:on the
199:C-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
650:design
595:Gillis
416:Wmahan
388:Merge?
368:Chris
205:scale.
126:Google
519:BotEC
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
751:talk
735:talk
715:talk
686:talk
671:talk
637:talk
619:talk
599:talk
583:talk
552:talk
527:talk
378:talk
336:jguk
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
414:).
412:MOS
300:Mid
176:TWL
766::
753:)
737:)
717:)
688:)
673:)
665:)
639:)
621:)
601:)
585:)
554:)
529:)
380:)
156:)
54:;
749:(
733:(
713:(
684:(
669:(
653:?
635:(
617:(
597:(
581:(
550:(
525:(
419:.
376:(
312:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
