71:
53:
275:", as you tell user:Wkwt above. For all we know, Labrinth may have been drunk when he replied on Twitter. IMO it's likely that he was just having fun with his followers/fans. I believe Labrinth knows perfectly well that "your" is indeed correct, and that he was just kidding when he wrote that it "was to annoy English teachers and grammar Nazis". The point is, however, that we're not supposed to include our own interpretations. The article now says that "fans asked Labrinth about the error" – I think that is in violation of
459:, it is actually sometimes permissible to use a direct reference from twitter as a source, particularly as Labrinth's page carries the verified official logo. That aside, I actually originally kept removing mentions of this because it was unsourced yet IPs kept adding it back. Then when the reference was added I've tried to make it more encyclopedic. Its only because several editors have added it back have I got involved in this discussion. —
22:
129:
saying: beneath, you are beautiful. The songwriter is actually saying, take off the artificial beautiful (the clothes, the make-up, etc), he/she wants to see beneath this layer of artificial beautiful ("let me see beneath your beautiful, see beneath your perfect, I want to see inside, let me see beneath your beautiful tonight... we ain't perfect.")
225:
about them. In the article, fans accuse
Labrinth of misspelling "you're" by using "your" in the song's title. Labrinth responded using the term "Grammar Nazis", and so whilst I accept that neither Labrinth nor the editor of the article use the term "grammar error", it doesn't change the fact that the
297:
I rephrased what was said per the article. The reference reads "many commented on his spelling of ‘your’ claiming his song title should be ‘Underneath You’re
Beautiful’" → which I've written on the page as → "The title of the song attracted attention from fans, some of whom questioned Labrinth about
161:
That is your personal opinion. The passage reads that some fans accused
Labrinth of writing a song with grammar errors. He replied via the article and reference given. Therefore the article is perfectly covering the subject and there is no issue with integrity. While your point above is sensible its
128:
I was the one who deleted the sentences about the "Beneath Your
Beautiful" song title containing a grammatical error. The reason for this is because this accusation (that it contains a grammatical error) is actually incorrect. The song uses "beautiful" as a noun, not a verb. The songwriter is not
428:, this whole mention about supposed grammatical errors being pointed out is not required in this article. There is no clear MOS for songs but the discussion is very much out of scope for this article (going by the articles I highlighted before). Moreover they fail
132:
As such, the accusations that it's grammatically incorrect has no basis given the context of the lyrics. To support the integrity of the article, these passages should either be removed, or the correct interpretation be placed.
302:
any more. For what its worth, having seen the lyrics I personally believe that
Labrinth uses the word "your" to describe "beautiful" as a noun rather than a description but that's not the purpose of including this reference
356:
That's not the sentence I was referring to in my previous comment – but the next one: "Upon reaching number one in several countries, fans asked
Labrinth via social networking website Twitter about the error". It violates
307:. This reference detailed hows some people think Labrinth has misspelled "your" and this is Labrinth's response. Its not upto us to decide whether he was drunk/having fun with his followers etc. That would be
455:
Its not actually a reference from
Twitter. Its an article from a local London new outlet that covered that fact that Labrinth has had a discussion with fans via his twitter page. Actually per
230:, but as it stands I don't accept that this is original research. Sometimes things need to be applied with a bit of logic, not every reference on every topic will explicitly say "X is Y". —
226:
fans accused
Labrinth of a grammar error. If he had misspelled the word then it would be a grammar error. If Labrinth hadn't mentioned grammar or spelling then I'd accept that it was
590:
580:
662:
658:
644:
298:
the spelling of the word "Your" within the song's title, believing that was a grammatical error and should have been spelt you're". I don't believe this is
267:
You're right that I should've chosen other words; I'm sorry for not writing for instance "Before this edit" instead. Regarding your last sentence: That is
591:
http://www.webcitation.org/6MRmHf8xS?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aria.com.au%2Fpages%2Faria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-100-singles-2013.htm
724:
581:
http://www.webcitation.org/6FRm3Uvas?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgaonchart.co.kr%2Fmain%2Fsection%2Fonline%2Fdownload%2Flist.gaon%3FnationGbn%3DE
304:
391:
87:
421:
531:
614:
705:
33:
594:
78:
58:
600:
70:
52:
149:
484:
Looks like a fine point about
Twitter but - to me - on the whole the issue has not recieved significant coverage (
661:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
21:
696:
584:
572:
564:
680:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
668:
539:
493:
475:
445:
387:
327:
246:
182:
39:
571:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
635:
379:
222:
137:
308:
86:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
608:
437:
311:. An encyclopedia reports on the facts... interpretation is what blogs and forums etc are for. —
665:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
681:
141:
518:
456:
366:
288:
212:
535:
489:
485:
460:
441:
429:
383:
312:
231:
167:
688:
279:, which states: "Even with well-sourced material, if you use it to advance a position not
615:
http://us.7digital.com/artist/labrinth-feat-emeli-sande-1/release/beneath-your-beautiful
199:, the article said: "The title of the song contains a grammatical error". That claim is
647:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
433:
145:
687:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
718:
595:
http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-100-singles-2013.htm
514:
362:
358:
299:
284:
276:
272:
227:
208:
200:
163:
710:
543:
522:
497:
479:
449:
395:
370:
331:
292:
250:
216:
186:
153:
601:
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/sitecomponent/a28814/singles-release-diary.html
654:
653:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
125:
Hey, I'm not sure how this works, it's my first time registering and talking.
440:. I am not taking any action for now and await further comments about this -
221:
Your use of the words "socalled clarification" do not have have a sense of
585:
http://gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/online/download/list.gaon?nationGbn=E
510:
425:
488:)and I have not found sigficant coverage of this. So I am concerned -
207:
by the source – it's your interpretation of the reply on Twitter.
283:
supported by the source, you are engaging in original research".
83:
15:
620:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
575:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
361:
by (indirectly) stating that there is in fact an error.
568:
513:
is a disambiguation page – which article did you mean?
196:
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
657:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
643:This message was posted before February 2018.
436:. The Twitter reference is not allowed as per
271:logic. It's "your opinion, not supported by a
8:
19:
47:
563:I have just modified 3 external links on
49:
632:to let others know (documentation at
7:
76:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
420:After going through articles like
14:
567:. Please take a moment to review
162:your opinion, not supported by a
69:
51:
20:
599:Corrected formatting/usage for
422:Playing with Fire (Plan B song)
532:Teardrop (Massive Attack song)
166:. I've rewarded to clarify. —
1:
396:17:58, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
371:17:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
332:14:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
293:22:15, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
251:16:32, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
217:05:41, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
187:22:50, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
154:22:19, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
90:and see a list of open tasks.
711:20:35, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
544:13:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
523:01:00, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
498:00:40, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
480:14:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
450:06:57, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
273:reliable third party source
164:reliable third party source
96:Knowledge:WikiProject Songs
741:
674:(last update: 5 June 2024)
560:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
375:changed error → spelling.
99:Template:WikiProject Songs
725:Start-Class song articles
64:
46:
556:External links modified
281:directly and explicitly
565:Beneath Your Beautiful
197:socalled clarification
28:This article is rated
655:regular verification
645:After February 2018
624:parameter below to
699:InternetArchiveBot
650:InternetArchiveBot
205:directly supported
34:content assessment
675:
399:
382:comment added by
228:original research
201:original research
157:
140:comment added by
118:
117:
114:
113:
110:
109:
79:WikiProject Songs
732:
709:
700:
673:
672:
651:
639:
612:
472:
470:
466:
398:
376:
324:
322:
318:
243:
241:
237:
179:
177:
173:
156:
134:
104:
103:
100:
97:
94:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
740:
739:
735:
734:
733:
731:
730:
729:
715:
714:
703:
698:
666:
659:have permission
649:
633:
606:
573:this simple FaQ
558:
468:
464:
462:
418:
377:
320:
316:
314:
239:
235:
233:
203:, as it is not
175:
171:
169:
135:
123:
101:
98:
95:
92:
91:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
738:
736:
728:
727:
717:
716:
693:
692:
685:
618:
617:
603:
597:
589:Added archive
587:
579:Added archive
557:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
503:
502:
501:
500:
417:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
190:
189:
122:
119:
116:
115:
112:
111:
108:
107:
105:
88:the discussion
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
737:
726:
723:
722:
720:
713:
712:
707:
702:
701:
690:
686:
683:
679:
678:
677:
670:
664:
660:
656:
652:
646:
641:
637:
631:
627:
623:
616:
610:
604:
602:
598:
596:
592:
588:
586:
582:
578:
577:
576:
574:
570:
566:
561:
555:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
526:
525:
524:
520:
516:
512:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
482:
481:
478:
477:
474:
473:
458:
454:
453:
452:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
415:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
374:
373:
372:
368:
364:
360:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
333:
330:
329:
326:
325:
310:
306:
301:
296:
295:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
252:
249:
248:
245:
244:
229:
224:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
193:
192:
191:
188:
185:
184:
181:
180:
165:
160:
159:
158:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
130:
126:
121:Grammar error
120:
106:
102:song articles
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
697:
694:
669:source check
648:
642:
629:
625:
621:
619:
562:
559:
528:Correction:
527:
476:
461:
419:
416:Not Relevant
378:— Preceding
328:
313:
309:WP:SYNTHESIS
280:
268:
247:
232:
204:
195:Before your
183:
168:
136:— Preceding
131:
127:
124:
77:
40:WikiProjects
636:Sourcecheck
536:Wikishagnik
490:Wikishagnik
442:Wikishagnik
438:WP:RELIABLE
384:Lil-unique1
30:Start-class
706:Report bug
457:WP:TWITTER
223:good faith
689:this tool
682:this tool
609:dead link
486:WP:SIGCOV
430:WP:SIGCOV
719:Category
695:Cheers.—
530:I meant
511:Teardrop
426:Teardrop
392:contribs
380:unsigned
150:contribs
138:unsigned
622:checked
613:tag to
569:my edit
515:Nording
434:WP:NOTE
363:Nording
285:Nording
209:Nording
630:failed
605:Added
467:niquℇ
319:niquℇ
238:niquℇ
174:niquℇ
36:scale.
359:WP:OR
300:WP:OR
277:WP:OR
93:Songs
84:songs
59:Songs
626:true
540:talk
519:talk
494:talk
463:Lil_
446:talk
432:and
424:and
388:talk
367:talk
315:Lil_
305:here
289:talk
269:your
234:Lil_
213:talk
170:Lil_
146:talk
142:Wkwt
663:RfC
640:).
628:or
593:to
583:to
721::
676:.
671:}}
667:{{
638:}}
634:{{
611:}}
607:{{
542:)
521:)
496:)
448:)
394:)
390:•
369:)
291:)
215:)
152:)
148:•
708:)
704:(
691:.
684:.
538:(
534:-
517:(
492:(
471:1
469:№
465:℧
444:(
386:(
365:(
323:1
321:№
317:℧
287:(
242:1
240:№
236:℧
211:(
178:1
176:№
172:℧
144:(
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
