418:
397:
293:
266:
218:
369:
533:
502:
428:
190:
629:
605:
303:
235:
543:
810:
says "The vessels convention does not apply to smaller conveyances such as cars, trucks, and buses, or to mission names. Also, most real-world spacecraft and rockets at this time are not given proper names, thus Apollo 11, Saturn V, Falcon 9, etc. are not appropriate." So is
Beresheet an exception to
953:
spacecraft. But the logic there is getting a little thin. The
Explorer spacecraft aren't italicized because they are a series of unrelated missions, and most of their own spacecraft have their own names. But a similar argument could be made for Pioneer. That's were I'd be guided by common usage. But
1050:
The early concept model of
Beresheet was used for public relations while lander configuration was still evolving. Lander that was eventually launched was visually completely different from conceptual render and most recent official images of lander before launch during integration activities or
989:
was essentially on autopilot at the time. We know something went wrong at about 2 km altitude, and signal was lost at about 0.7 km (I think those are the correct numbers.) Do we know it was actually under control or partial control at the time of impact?
1009:
I came to this article to see if life was spreading on the Moon. The question isn't answered here, even though it is answered in reference 26: "Spivack says there’s no reason to worry about water bears taking over the moon."
153:
919:
should also be italics? (or is that another thing, maybe just the "Beresheet" part of the name) By the way, I didn't mean to be "misleading" in the quote I used, it was just a misunderstanding.
638:
516:
378:
276:
1169:
676:
595:
769:
It was a proximate cause, but not the root cause; was definitely multi-causal. Read the WP article now, after it was updated with the post-crash investigation report today.
614:
512:
147:
359:
1194:
985:
What's the correct term for the end of mission event? I agree a crash landing is a reasonable term for a vehicle under partial control at the time of impact. But
643:
1129:
349:
79:
937:
Sorry about the "misleading" comment. I wrote that after seeing a fairly blatant quote taken out of context, so I wasn't feeling charitable. When it comes to
1096:
Summarized the
Weizmann Institute report in the article prose just now. Also, for those most interested, just read the report from the citation. Cheers.
807:
484:
1164:
585:
1149:
474:
1119:
1139:
325:
85:
1189:
1179:
1154:
1134:
619:
450:
1124:
758:
30:
316:
271:
1159:
1144:
789:
556:
507:
99:
1184:
695:
44:
441:
402:
104:
20:
1199:
727:
669:
74:
246:
1174:
712:. I do not have the technical ability to do this (at least quickly), but if someone else want to do it that would be great.
961:
Thanks, its fine. my fault for just using the quote without using the other one as well (next time I will be more careful).
65:
684:
168:
1070:
In the end, according to my source, the probe בראשית took a final selfie of itself. Attached is the article and photo
135:
1071:
217:
109:
752:
896:
is a proper name and therefore the spacecraft bearing that name should be italicized. Note the example of the
417:
396:
252:
1074:
793:
680:
715:
129:
954:
for a reflight or a pair of spacecraft, I'd definitely keep the italics. (By the way, I personally think
55:
1029:
1015:
748:
699:
449:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
324:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
945:
as an example of something which should be in italics. And that's also how we do it for the individual
70:
125:
1081:
723:
202:
234:
966:
924:
816:
161:
870:. Do not italicize a mission, series, or class except where it coincides with a craft's name: the
308:
175:
189:
51:
1025:
1011:
995:
905:
548:
1077:
719:
433:
665:
The following
Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
962:
920:
812:
709:
292:
265:
141:
1113:
1101:
774:
1045:
1072:
https://gizmodo.com/israels-beresheet-probe-crashes-on-the-moon-1833979818#replies
887:
881:
877:
871:
864:
856:
849:
842:
991:
916:
901:
368:
321:
1055:
538:
423:
298:
744:
561:
532:
501:
196:
24:
604:
1075:
https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/teswnxusyu89lx8g7rqk.png
1097:
770:
628:
1052:
446:
195:
A news item involving
Beresheet was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
958:
is a silly name. Wouldn't that translate as "second beginning"?)
837:
This is a mischaracterization of the Manual of Style, which says:
1105:
1085:
1060:
1033:
1019:
999:
970:
928:
909:
820:
797:
778:
763:
731:
703:
688:
661:
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
941:, I think it would be italicized. The Manual of Style does use
228:
184:
15:
1092:
Article is updated with the post-crash investigation results
627:
603:
367:
216:
829:
See Fcrary's comment. Trialpears 09:14, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
827:
Agreed, it seems like the title shouldn't be in italics.
749:
manual command likely caused
Israeli Moon lander's crash
209:
160:
694:
Removed the image until copyvio status is resolved.
445:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
320:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
708:I believe we could get a suitable replacement from
174:
981:Landing attempt versus crash landing versus crash
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
675:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
1170:B-Class Astronomy articles of High-importance
1024:No response, so I added that to the article.
8:
560:, which collaborates on articles related to
915:Thank you for clarifying the rule, okay so
713:
496:
391:
260:
498:
393:
334:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Spaceflight
262:
232:
841:Spacecraft (including fictional): the
1195:High-importance Solar System articles
570:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Astronomy
7:
1130:High-importance spaceflight articles
1120:Knowledge (XXG) In the news articles
554:This article is within the scope of
459:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Rocketry
439:This article is within the scope of
314:This article is within the scope of
1053:https://www.iai.co.il/p/moon-lander
900:spacecraft in the Manual of Style.
251:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1165:High-importance Astronomy articles
808:WP:Manual of Style/Text formatting
14:
1150:High-importance Rocketry articles
803:Article title (how its displayed)
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1140:WikiProject Spaceflight articles
541:
531:
500:
426:
416:
395:
337:Template:WikiProject Spaceflight
301:
291:
264:
233:
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1039:Lander image concept vs reality
590:This article has been rated as
479:This article has been rated as
354:This article has been rated as
1000:18:15, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
573:Template:WikiProject Astronomy
1:
1190:B-Class Solar System articles
1180:High-importance Moon articles
1155:WikiProject Rocketry articles
1135:SpaceX working group articles
636:This article is supported by
612:This article is supported by
462:Template:WikiProject Rocketry
453:and see a list of open tasks.
376:This article is supported by
328:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1125:B-Class spaceflight articles
1106:01:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
1086:00:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
1034:05:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
1020:02:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
886:was launched as part of the
779:01:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
1216:
1160:B-Class Astronomy articles
798:00:21, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
764:05:05, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
732:19:40, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
704:13:49, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
689:19:21, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
670:Beresheet Landing site.png
596:project's importance scale
485:project's importance scale
360:project's importance scale
1145:B-Class Rocketry articles
1051:testing can be referred.
635:
611:
589:
526:
478:
411:
375:
353:
286:
259:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1185:Moon task force articles
1061:22:43, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
971:22:30, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
929:20:27, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
910:18:29, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
821:05:51, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
785:Beware the Ides of April
1200:Solar System task force
639:Solar System task force
317:WikiProject Spaceflight
878:Apollo 11 lunar lander
632:
608:
372:
241:This article is rated
222:
75:avoid personal attacks
1175:B-Class Moon articles
631:
607:
557:WikiProject Astronomy
371:
245:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
220:
100:Neutral point of view
442:WikiProject Rocketry
379:SpaceX working group
340:spaceflight articles
277:SpaceX working group
105:No original research
564:on Knowledge (XXG).
681:Community Tech bot
633:
609:
576:Astronomy articles
373:
309:Spaceflight portal
247:content assessment
223:
86:dispute resolution
47:
734:
718:comment added by
658:
657:
654:
653:
650:
649:
495:
494:
491:
490:
465:Rocketry articles
390:
389:
386:
385:
227:
226:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1207:
1058:
1049:
889:
885:
879:
875:
869:
868:-class starships
862:
854:
847:
761:
755:
739:"Manual command"
578:
577:
574:
571:
568:
551:
549:Astronomy portal
546:
545:
544:
535:
528:
527:
522:
519:
504:
497:
467:
466:
463:
460:
457:
436:
431:
430:
429:
420:
413:
412:
407:
399:
392:
342:
341:
338:
335:
332:
311:
306:
305:
304:
295:
288:
287:
282:
279:
268:
261:
244:
238:
237:
229:
212:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1215:
1214:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1110:
1109:
1094:
1068:
1066:The final image
1056:
1043:
1041:
1007:
983:
888:Voyager program
835:Strongly Oppose
805:
787:
759:
753:
741:
677:nomination page
663:
644:High-importance
620:High-importance
615:Moon task force
592:High-importance
575:
572:
569:
566:
565:
547:
542:
540:
521:High‑importance
520:
510:
481:High-importance
464:
461:
458:
455:
454:
434:Rocketry portal
432:
427:
425:
406:High‑importance
405:
356:High-importance
339:
336:
333:
330:
329:
307:
302:
300:
281:High‑importance
280:
274:
242:
221:Knowledge (XXG)
208:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1213:
1211:
1203:
1202:
1197:
1192:
1187:
1182:
1177:
1172:
1167:
1162:
1157:
1152:
1147:
1142:
1137:
1132:
1127:
1122:
1112:
1111:
1093:
1090:
1067:
1064:
1040:
1037:
1006:
1005:Life spreading
1003:
982:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
932:
931:
843:Space Shuttle
839:
838:
831:
830:
811:this rule? :)
804:
801:
786:
783:
782:
781:
740:
737:
736:
735:
710:NASA WorldWind
706:
673:
672:
662:
659:
656:
655:
652:
651:
648:
647:
634:
624:
623:
610:
600:
599:
588:
582:
581:
579:
553:
552:
536:
524:
523:
505:
493:
492:
489:
488:
477:
471:
470:
468:
451:the discussion
438:
437:
421:
409:
408:
400:
388:
387:
384:
383:
374:
364:
363:
352:
346:
345:
343:
326:the discussion
313:
312:
296:
284:
283:
269:
257:
256:
250:
239:
225:
224:
214:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1212:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1193:
1191:
1188:
1186:
1183:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1173:
1171:
1168:
1166:
1163:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1141:
1138:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1117:
1115:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1091:
1089:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1065:
1063:
1062:
1059:
1054:
1047:
1038:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1004:
1002:
1001:
997:
993:
988:
980:
972:
968:
964:
960:
959:
957:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
935:
934:
933:
930:
926:
922:
918:
914:
913:
912:
911:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
884:
874:
867:
860:
852:
846:
836:
833:
832:
828:
825:
824:
823:
822:
818:
814:
809:
802:
800:
799:
795:
791:
784:
780:
776:
772:
768:
767:
766:
765:
762:
756:
750:
746:
743:According to
738:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
711:
707:
705:
701:
697:
693:
692:
691:
690:
686:
682:
678:
671:
668:
667:
666:
660:
645:
642:(assessed as
641:
640:
630:
626:
625:
621:
618:(assessed as
617:
616:
606:
602:
601:
597:
593:
587:
584:
583:
580:
563:
559:
558:
550:
539:
537:
534:
530:
529:
525:
518:
514:
509:
506:
503:
499:
486:
482:
476:
473:
472:
469:
452:
448:
444:
443:
435:
424:
422:
419:
415:
414:
410:
404:
401:
398:
394:
381:
380:
370:
366:
365:
361:
357:
351:
348:
347:
344:
327:
323:
319:
318:
310:
299:
297:
294:
290:
289:
285:
278:
273:
270:
267:
263:
258:
254:
248:
240:
236:
231:
230:
219:
215:
211:
210:16 April 2019
206:
205:
204:
198:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1095:
1069:
1042:
1023:
1008:
986:
984:
955:
950:
946:
942:
938:
897:
893:
892:
882:
872:
866:Constitution
865:
858:
850:
844:
840:
834:
826:
806:
790:51.9.225.162
788:
742:
714:— Preceding
674:
664:
637:
613:
591:
555:
517:Solar System
480:
440:
377:
355:
315:
253:WikiProjects
201:
200:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1088:Megabits13
1026:Art LaPella
1012:Art LaPella
956:Beresheet 2
939:Beresheet 2
917:Beresheet 2
696:66.85.41.75
331:Spaceflight
322:spaceflight
272:Spaceflight
207:section on
203:In the news
148:free images
31:not a forum
1114:Categories
1078:Megabits13
859:Enterprise
845:Challenger
720:Trialpears
987:Beresheet
963:OkayKenji
943:Voyager 2
921:OkayKenji
883:Voyager 2
853:satellite
813:OkayKenji
745:Space.com
567:Astronomy
562:Astronomy
508:Astronomy
197:Main Page
88:if needed
71:Be polite
25:Beresheet
21:talk page
894:Bereheet
876:was the
861:NCC-1701
728:contribs
716:unsigned
456:Rocketry
447:rocketry
403:Rocketry
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
947:Pioneer
751:". ---
594:on the
483:on the
358:on the
243:B-class
199:in the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1057:Ohsin
992:Fcrary
951:Viking
902:Fcrary
760:crumbs
754:Coffee
249:scale.
126:Google
873:Eagle
747:, a "
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1102:talk
1082:talk
1030:talk
1016:talk
996:talk
967:talk
949:and
925:talk
906:talk
898:Gaia
857:USS
851:Gaia
817:talk
794:talk
775:talk
724:talk
700:talk
685:talk
586:High
513:Moon
475:High
350:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1098:N2e
771:N2e
757:and
679:. —
176:TWL
1116::
1104:)
1084:)
1046:בר
1032:)
1018:)
998:)
969:)
927:)
908:)
890:.
880:;
863:,
855:,
848:,
819:)
796:)
777:)
730:)
726:•
702:)
687:)
646:).
622:).
515:/
511::
275::
156:)
54:;
1100:(
1080:(
1048::
1044:@
1028:(
1014:(
994:(
965:(
923:(
904:(
815:(
792:(
773:(
722:(
698:(
683:(
598:.
487:.
382:.
362:.
255::
213:.
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
-logo-v2.svg.png){kind=logo}
