932:
want people really making a choice in the matter. Honestly even the FSF isn't calling out producers of binary blobs on this one. nVidia would have been fried a long time ago, but the simple fact is that proprietary modules aren't derivative code and they aren't violating the GPL. If they were, the FSF would have called it a long time ago. binary blobs are not illegal in the GPL, and they're not evil, either. Binary blobs are what makes a great deal of hardware even work on Linux satisfactorily. The
Stallmanist agenda is to force everyone into using GPL-compatible code,even if it means using crippled software. I say this as an enthusiastic FOSSie. I just know what's really important about open source, and it's not truly an ethical issue like the Stallmanists want it to be.
345:
1065:
the kernel, are called 'blobs', and that's how we use the term. In BSD parlance, the term 'blob' means something else: a nonfree driver. OpenBSD and perhaps other BSD distributions (called 'projects' by BSD developers) have the policy of not including those. That is the right policy, as regards drivers; but when the developers say these distributions 'contain no blobs,' it causes a misunderstanding. They are not talking about firmware blobs. No BSD distribution has policies against proprietary binary-only firmware that might be loaded even by free drivers." --
727:
political, and only a very small group of FOSSies have any actual issue with it to boot. Even Linus
Torvalds has pretty well put his foot down on the "ethics" of binary blobs. And the only reason why he put in taint code in the kernel was to shut up the anti-proprietary whining that was going on at the time. He had shut down any discussion of allowing GPL-only modules in the kernel in a later discussion. No one's called out nVidia on violating the GPL because they very plainly didn't. Even the FSF isn't claiming they did, just the noisy zealots are.
253:
222:
321:
191:
408:
398:
377:
1045:
As if this explains anything about why it's pejorative. This article is going to have to explain it in layman's term. The average reader has absolutely no clue what this article means/is about. Unless I'm mistaken, pejorative means disparaging. So why is it used as a disparaging term, and why exactly
983:
I've tagged this for a rewrite. At the current state, it's a rambling, incoherent, and biased mess. To anyone who can help rewrite this article into a more appropriate one, please do. I'm not familiar with the topic, and an article's purpose should be to clearly inform readers on what the subject is,
589:
article does not (although maybe it should) cover the official policy/licensing of the Linux kernel, such as it is, it just notes that some Linux distributions are happy to distribute binary modules. Linux developers have generally not gone out of their way to encourage binary blobs, complaints about
931:
It's not a joke, it's simply bringing to light the typical overzealous misinterpretation of the GPL you'll find in the typical
Stallmanist following. There's truly no technical problems with binary blobs you wouldn't find on any other platform. The only reasont hey're making a big deal is they don't
532:
I know why there not considered a binary blob, but there is a project called openbios which replaces the bios (which is firmware?) with a open bios. I suppose in reality to exclude firmware completly would mean free open operating systems would take a lot longer to develop and many consider firmware
1064:
The BSD people and the GNU/Linux people use the term 'blob' differently: "Linux includes 'blobs': pieces of object code distributed without source, usually firmware to run some device. FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD kernels include nonfree firmware blobs. Nonfree firmware programs used with Linux,
848:
How could it possibly be a problem outside of the free software community? If you expect all vendors to provide source code in addition to compiled binaries, you are, ipso facto, a member of the free software community. It's kind of like asking if lactose intolerance is considered a problem outside
490:
I really don't think that is going to happen, noone outside the OpenBSD community really cares, just look at how many major operating systems even mention binaries as a problem? Hell, Scott Long of FreeBSD regularly mocks OpenBSD's efforts and claims their reverse engineered work is illegal, while
647:
I am not sure that i should do it - i am a mere
Slashdot reader and user of GNU/Linux who just happens to be curious about the goings-on of the community. This is not enough to write precise information. I really don't want to get into the trouble of writing something wrong about the management of
564:
According to the GPL, code licensed under GPL can only be merged and/or linked with code that is licensed under GPL or a compatible license. So how can a binary blob be legally distributed, if it is not "Accompan with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code", where "source code" is
936:
No it is not a joke. The choice of having a computing device with software you are legaly able to inspect. An extreme figure like Mr
Stallman drawing peoples attention to the real (? we can only guess) price for convenience. Your anger as an "enthusiastic FOSSie" may come from an inner tension of
726:
Actually, the GPL doesn't say anything about linking proprietary code, that was made up by a lot of people who hate binary blobs. The ONLY thing you can't do with proprietary code in the GPL is derivative works, which most proprietary drivers are not. The only true issues with binary blobs are
967:
binary blobs into its source tree" (emphasis mine) and the reference is a song (??), and then later it says "OpenBSD project accepts binary firmware images and will redistribute the images if the licence permits". Binary firmware images includes in the driver are binary blobs, so which part is
1105:
Probably not. It is guaranteed that a random bit of binary about which no serious public information exists will act in a random fashion, only coinciding with the wishes of the kernel developers for a short period. The unexpected is that it might conform to the wishes of the unfortunate user.
869:
I think the problem section should also talk about potential license violation. As others stated as well, I don't feel myself to know enought about the matter to publish. I just feel, the 'Problems' section should talk not only about technical, but also about ethical problems.
560:
The current article says that blobs are accepted into the Linux kernel "as a fast route to the missing or enhanced functionality these blobs provide". And i wonder - how can it be legal? Who allowed this "fast route"? This must have been discussed somewhere, maybe at the LKML.
896:
Take a look from afar, imagining for a moment you aren't a fanatical linux user but a computer scientist. This topic discusses a pejorative term. According to it windows drivers are all 'blobs'. It's quite easy to extrapolate to that. This information should be included in a
543:
The difference is that the BIOS runs on the main CPU and is general-purpose, the firmware on specific cards do not and are not. That firmware is really part of the hardware. You want open hardware, it is important; open software, it's API is important but it itself is not.
1566:
354:
236:
916:
It does mention
Windows NVIDIA drivers as 'blobs' - not sure if that's accurate or not, but if Microsoft developers have no insight into these drivers then to them it would be a binary blob they can't do anything about.
491:
Mark
Shuttleworth of Ubuntu has said he will seek out more in order to give his users the "best" experience. Much like in the OpenBSD release 3.9 song, blob is taking over the world and the people are loving it.
153:
1561:
359:
581:
Closed-source binary drivers are allowed to be loaded into the kernel, although it does "taint" the kernel. There has of course been much discussion of the legality of this, Google should turn it up (
764:
Depends on who is talking, usually I use it as a blob, as in a pile of gunk, a load of garbage, a slimeball, a disgusting little mess, since if I were using an acronym, I'd be using BLOB, not blob.
838:
issue? Is the term used outside of the free software community, and is this problem an issue (is it considered a problem and are people working on it) outside of the free software community? --
1012:
It's a pejorative in the sense that "pig in a poke" is pejorative. It's a bill of goods. I'm not sure it should be necessary to underline that fact, but I could possible become convinced. --
1556:
1021:
Because it is a term unique to one community, which refers exclusively to products of those who are by definition not part of that community. Whaddaya' think “pejorative” means?
1546:
1571:
1464:
1460:
1446:
1316:
1312:
1298:
147:
1190:
that something is a soft, amorphous mass. Thus, "binary blob" isn't that much redundant, and it means something like "a binary object with unknown internals". —
311:
79:
1148:
Trying to avoid that competitors also use it? Afraid of patent issues if others can See (better) how your product is working? Just don't think/care about it?
1531:
301:
533:
less of a issue than drivers, as there not directly communicating with the operating system but with a driver. My point was a little food for thought..
1541:
335:
1090:
Shouldn't it be mentioned in the problems section, that due to Linux' unstable driver ABI a binary blob might not work with later kernel versions? --
568:
I am not a kernel driver developer, but clearly, an undocumented binary blob is not "the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it".
464:
1186:
Beside "binary large object", "BLOB" can also mean "basic large object" as an abbreviation. At the same time, "blob" is an ordinary
English word,
85:
1586:
454:
1416:
277:
1394:
486:
This is still OpenBSD specific, even after I added a sentence about the FSF. Fans of other OSes are invited to expand this article! -- Joachim
1022:
877:
850:
776:
30:
815:
I updated the article to remove ATi's name as they have in fact made a significant amount of information on their cards' hardware public.
1591:
1526:
44:
430:
1536:
1172:
1149:
1071:
944:
732:
260:
227:
99:
1442:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1046:
is it disparaging? And I remember I first saw this term in a non-free-software context, which didn't use this term pejoratively. -
330:
232:
104:
20:
74:
1581:
1576:
512:
202:
1551:
421:
382:
65:
168:
1507:
1359:
1199:
135:
998:
Also, why exactly is this a pejorative? There is no explanation, and the introduction does not adequately explain. -
109:
1119:
Spoken like a true open-source advocate. :-) I wouldn't call a binary-only driver that's released by some vendor
1463:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1315:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1264:
1254:
1244:
608:
The article should state clearly what is decided at the kernel level and what is decided at the distro level. --
344:
1026:
1417:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060702163150/http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/06/21/79536_HNwifibreach_1.html
1168:
881:
854:
780:
208:
1426:
1234:
129:
1498:
1395:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060323022626/http://os.newsforge.com/os/05/06/09/2132233.shtml?tid=8&tid=2
1386:
1350:
1226:
1176:
1153:
1075:
835:
940:
873:
1107:
1013:
948:
736:
273:
55:
1482:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1470:
1334:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1322:
591:
429:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
276:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
125:
1385:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1225:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
674:
70:
1420:
1289:
1398:
1047:
999:
985:
190:
1051:
1003:
989:
922:
906:
898:
751:
673:
Not willing to spout your opinion as if definative, sheese, what kind of Slashdot reader are you?
175:
161:
1467:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1319:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
536:
1483:
1335:
816:
799:
1128:
1095:
571:
I've been wondering about this ever since i first read the first announcement of gNewSense. --
51:
1195:
590:
the tainting scheme and frequent ABI changes have basically met with "tough shit" (see, eg,
1490:
1342:
141:
1449:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1301:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
918:
902:
820:
1489:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1456:
1341:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1308:
1520:
973:
963:
The article is confusing - first it says that OpenBSD has a "policy of not accepting
765:
492:
937:
knowing you are using software that you are not allowed investigate for your self?
1124:
1091:
755:
706:
649:
609:
572:
413:
1067:
1378:
1218:
1191:
839:
586:
516:
24:
320:
252:
221:
1455:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1307:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
403:
1265:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071211025952/http://kerneltrap.org:80/node/6497
1255:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060620051155/http://kerneltrap.org:80/node/4118
1245:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071211025952/http://kerneltrap.org:80/node/6497
804:
626:
595:
545:
504:
269:
1427:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060603230511/http://kerneltrap.org/node/6650
1235:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060603230017/http://kerneltrap.org/node/6550
1121:"a random bit of binary about which no serious public information exists"
969:
265:
1187:
702:
I share my opinions on my blog and i try to avoid it on Knowledge (XXG).
625:
Sure, feel free to fix it, there seem to be quite a few suitable cites.
565:
defined as "the preferred form of the work for making modificatto it"?
592:
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/09/02/driver_ease.html
1167:
What does "Binary BLOB" mean? "Binary binary large object"? Did the
1512:
1421:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/06/21/79536_HNwifibreach_1.html
1364:
1203:
1180:
1157:
1132:
1110:
1099:
1079:
1055:
1030:
1016:
1007:
993:
977:
952:
926:
910:
885:
858:
842:
824:
810:
784:
768:
758:
740:
709:
677:
652:
629:
612:
598:
575:
548:
519:
495:
1436:
1430:
1410:
1404:
1268:
1258:
1248:
1238:
582:
508:
426:
407:
1567:
C-Class Free and open-source software articles of High-importance
1399:
http://os.newsforge.com/os/05/06/09/2132233.shtml?tid=8&tid=2
397:
376:
184:
15:
1068:'Explaining Why We Don't Endorse Other Systems,' from gnu.org
796:
1274:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
343:
319:
1145:
Why don't the companies release their code AS open source?
1389:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1229:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1382:
1222:
1562:
High-importance Free and open-source software articles
160:
754:? (in which case "binary blob" would be a pleonasm).
425:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
264:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1459:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1311:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
731:Does the part on vista driver crashes belong here?
174:
775:Actually, that would be BLOb, but whatever. :-)
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
865:Problem section: focus only technical problems?
1557:C-Class Free and open-source software articles
1445:This message was posted before February 2018.
1297:This message was posted before February 2018.
1043:"Because it is a term unique to one community"
705:On /. i mostly RTFA, i hardly ever comment. --
795:Does this mandate an update to this article?
8:
1547:C-Class software articles of Mid-importance
594:which has some quotes from Linus on LKML).
1572:All Free and open-source software articles
938:
511:have a similar policy and I've heard that
371:
216:
1377:I have just modified 6 external links on
1217:I have just modified 4 external links on
556:Why is it accepted into the Linux kernel?
373:
218:
188:
1286:to let others know (documentation at
834:Is it accurate to say that this is a
648:the kernel and misrepresenting it. --
286:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computing
7:
419:This article is within the scope of
258:This article is within the scope of
1169:Department of Redundancy Department
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
1532:Low-importance Computing articles
1381:. Please take a moment to review
1221:. Please take a moment to review
515:are considering the same idea. --
439:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Linux
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1542:Mid-importance software articles
830:A free software community issue?
585:is one example). Note that this
406:
396:
375:
251:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1437:http://kerneltrap.org/node/6497
1435:Corrected formatting/usage for
1431:http://kerneltrap.org/node/6650
1411:http://kerneltrap.org/node/4118
1409:Corrected formatting/usage for
1405:http://kerneltrap.org/node/6497
1403:Corrected formatting/usage for
1269:http://kerneltrap.org/node/6497
1259:http://kerneltrap.org/node/4118
1249:http://kerneltrap.org/node/6497
1239:http://kerneltrap.org/node/6550
583:http://kerneltrap.org/node/1735
459:This article has been rated as
306:This article has been rated as
1587:High-importance Linux articles
1141:One important issue is missing
811:02:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
289:Template:WikiProject Computing
1:
825:03:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
769:19:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
759:17:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
539:Fri Oct 13 19:56:00 BST 2006
433:and see a list of open tasks.
355:Free and open-source software
352:This article is supported by
328:This article is supported by
280:and see a list of open tasks.
237:Free and open-source software
42:Put new text under old text.
1365:19:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
1056:07:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
953:03:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
843:22:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
750:Is this the same blob as in
549:19:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
520:22:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
507:cares pretty hard. I think
1031:07:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
791:AMD release ATI cards specs
1608:
1592:WikiProject Linux articles
1527:C-Class Computing articles
1476:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1374:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1328:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1214:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1086:Possible incompatibilities
1080:11:28, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
978:20:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
886:12:23, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
465:project's importance scale
442:Template:WikiProject Linux
312:project's importance scale
1537:C-Class software articles
1513:15:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
1158:18:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
1133:13:38, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
1111:00:07, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1100:00:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1017:00:04, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
1008:22:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
994:06:49, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
849:the mammalian community.
710:20:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
678:18:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
653:19:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
630:18:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
613:13:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
599:12:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
576:07:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
496:23:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
458:
391:
351:
327:
305:
246:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
959:OpenBSD stance confusing
927:22:22, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
911:23:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
859:08:56, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
785:09:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
741:00:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
1370:External links modified
1210:External links modified
1204:09:40, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
1181:14:02, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
984:and what it's about. -
836:free software community
1582:C-Class Linux articles
1577:All Computing articles
348:
324:
274:information technology
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1552:All Software articles
347:
323:
261:WikiProject Computing
201:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
1457:regular verification
1309:regular verification
892:Uhm, this is a joke?
331:WikiProject Software
105:No original research
1447:After February 2018
1299:After February 2018
1278:parameter below to
752:Binary large object
1501:InternetArchiveBot
1452:InternetArchiveBot
1353:InternetArchiveBot
1304:InternetArchiveBot
1123:. Whatever... --
349:
325:
292:Computing articles
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1477:
1329:
955:
943:comment added by
876:comment added by
482:OpenBSD specific?
479:
478:
475:
474:
471:
470:
422:WikiProject Linux
370:
369:
366:
365:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1599:
1511:
1502:
1475:
1474:
1453:
1363:
1354:
1327:
1326:
1305:
1293:
1171:coin this term?
888:
809:
807:
800:Slashdot article
447:
446:
443:
440:
437:
416:
411:
410:
400:
393:
392:
387:
379:
372:
294:
293:
290:
287:
284:
255:
248:
247:
242:
239:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1607:
1606:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1517:
1516:
1505:
1500:
1468:
1461:have permission
1451:
1387:this simple FaQ
1372:
1357:
1352:
1320:
1313:have permission
1303:
1287:
1227:this simple FaQ
1212:
1165:
1143:
1088:
961:
894:
871:
867:
832:
805:
803:
793:
748:
707:Amir E. Aharoni
650:Amir E. Aharoni
610:Amir E. Aharoni
573:Amir E. Aharoni
558:
530:
484:
461:High-importance
444:
441:
438:
435:
434:
412:
405:
386:High‑importance
385:
360:High-importance
291:
288:
285:
282:
281:
240:
230:
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1605:
1603:
1595:
1594:
1589:
1584:
1579:
1574:
1569:
1564:
1559:
1554:
1549:
1544:
1539:
1534:
1529:
1519:
1518:
1495:
1494:
1487:
1440:
1439:
1433:
1425:Added archive
1423:
1415:Added archive
1413:
1407:
1401:
1393:Added archive
1371:
1368:
1347:
1346:
1339:
1272:
1271:
1263:Added archive
1261:
1253:Added archive
1251:
1243:Added archive
1241:
1233:Added archive
1211:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1164:
1161:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1114:
1113:
1087:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1044:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1023:72.235.213.232
1019:
996:
960:
957:
934:
933:
929:
893:
890:
878:78.227.100.250
866:
863:
862:
861:
851:76.126.134.152
831:
828:
797:Specs on X.org
792:
789:
788:
787:
777:76.126.134.152
772:
771:
747:
746:origin of word
744:
729:
728:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
703:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
618:
617:
616:
615:
603:
602:
557:
554:
553:
552:
529:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
499:
498:
483:
480:
477:
476:
473:
472:
469:
468:
457:
451:
450:
448:
445:Linux articles
431:the discussion
418:
417:
401:
389:
388:
380:
368:
367:
364:
363:
350:
340:
339:
336:Mid-importance
326:
316:
315:
308:Low-importance
304:
298:
297:
295:
278:the discussion
256:
244:
243:
241:Low‑importance
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1604:
1593:
1590:
1588:
1585:
1583:
1580:
1578:
1575:
1573:
1570:
1568:
1565:
1563:
1560:
1558:
1555:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1545:
1543:
1540:
1538:
1535:
1533:
1530:
1528:
1525:
1524:
1522:
1515:
1514:
1509:
1504:
1503:
1492:
1488:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1472:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1434:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1412:
1408:
1406:
1402:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1375:
1369:
1367:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1355:
1344:
1340:
1337:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1324:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1300:
1295:
1291:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1215:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1162:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1146:
1140:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1112:
1109:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1070:
1069:
1063:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
995:
991:
987:
982:
981:
980:
979:
975:
971:
966:
958:
956:
954:
950:
946:
942:
930:
928:
924:
920:
915:
914:
913:
912:
908:
904:
900:
899:Linux drivers
891:
889:
887:
883:
879:
875:
864:
860:
856:
852:
847:
846:
845:
844:
841:
837:
829:
827:
826:
822:
818:
813:
812:
808:
801:
798:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
773:
770:
767:
763:
762:
761:
760:
757:
753:
745:
743:
742:
738:
734:
725:
724:
711:
708:
704:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
679:
676:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
654:
651:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
631:
628:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
614:
611:
607:
606:
605:
604:
600:
597:
593:
588:
584:
580:
579:
578:
577:
574:
569:
566:
562:
555:
550:
547:
542:
541:
540:
538:
534:
527:
521:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
502:
501:
500:
497:
494:
489:
488:
487:
481:
466:
462:
456:
453:
452:
449:
432:
428:
424:
423:
415:
409:
404:
402:
399:
395:
394:
390:
384:
381:
378:
374:
361:
358:(assessed as
357:
356:
346:
342:
341:
337:
334:(assessed as
333:
332:
322:
318:
317:
313:
309:
303:
300:
299:
296:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:
257:
254:
250:
249:
245:
238:
234:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1499:
1496:
1471:source check
1450:
1444:
1441:
1376:
1373:
1351:
1348:
1323:source check
1302:
1296:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1273:
1216:
1213:
1173:129.69.215.1
1166:
1150:46.115.92.23
1147:
1144:
1120:
1089:
1072:12.218.76.10
1066:
964:
962:
945:1.125.48.142
939:— Preceding
935:
895:
868:
833:
814:
794:
749:
733:72.166.40.13
730:
675:74.13.46.118
570:
567:
563:
559:
535:
531:
485:
460:
420:
414:Linux portal
353:
329:
307:
259:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1379:Binary blob
1290:Sourcecheck
1219:Binary blob
968:correct? --
901:article. --
872:—Preceding
587:Binary blob
148:free images
31:not a forum
25:Binary blob
1521:Categories
1508:Report bug
1360:Report bug
1491:this tool
1484:this tool
1343:this tool
1336:this tool
1163:Etymology
1048:M0rphzone
1000:M0rphzone
986:M0rphzone
919:Joffeloff
903:AaThinker
505:GNewSense
283:Computing
270:computing
266:computers
228:Computing
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1497:Cheers.—
1349:Cheers.—
1200:contribs
941:unsigned
874:unsigned
766:Janizary
528:Firmware
493:Janizary
233:Software
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1383:my edit
1276:checked
1223:my edit
1188:meaning
1125:Berntie
1092:Berntie
756:Apokrif
463:on the
310:on the
199:C-class
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1284:failed
1192:Dsimic
840:Gronky
517:Gronky
513:Fedora
272:, and
205:scale.
126:Google
537:Allix
509:Ututo
436:Linux
427:Linux
383:Linux
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1280:true
1196:talk
1177:talk
1154:talk
1129:talk
1096:talk
1076:talk
1052:talk
1027:talk
1004:talk
990:talk
974:talk
970:Joy
949:talk
923:talk
907:talk
882:talk
855:talk
821:talk
817:Pgk1
806:Kl4m
781:talk
737:talk
627:NicM
596:NicM
546:NicM
455:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1465:RfC
1429:to
1419:to
1397:to
1317:RfC
1294:).
1282:or
1267:to
1257:to
1247:to
1237:to
965:any
802:--
302:Low
176:TWL
1523::
1478:.
1473:}}
1469:{{
1330:.
1325:}}
1321:{{
1292:}}
1288:{{
1202:)
1198:|
1179:)
1156:)
1131:)
1108:TS
1106:--
1098:)
1078:)
1054:)
1029:)
1014:TS
1006:)
992:)
976:)
951:)
925:)
917:--
909:)
884:)
857:)
823:)
783:)
739:)
362:).
338:).
268:,
235:/
231::
156:)
54:;
1510:)
1506:(
1493:.
1486:.
1362:)
1358:(
1345:.
1338:.
1194:(
1175:(
1152:(
1127:(
1094:(
1074:(
1050:(
1025:(
1002:(
988:(
972:(
947:(
921:(
905:(
880:(
853:(
819:(
779:(
735:(
632:.
601:.
551:.
467:.
314:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
